Monday 1 July 2013

The Country of Laughter and Forgetting By Okey Ndibe


Okey Ndibe
Many lovers of contemporary fiction would quickly recognize that my title is a nod to Milan Kundera’s intriguing novel, The Book of Laughter and Forgetting. In Kundera’s title I have found something of a perfect handle for what I suggest is a particular Nigerian fact: the tendency to laugh harder as life proves direr, and the haste to forget what most deserves to be remembered. We laugh so easily – and so spiritedly – because we have found the strange magic of forgetting how twisted out of shape our country is. For Nigerians, amnesia (or even willed forgetfulness) is a hope, a shield, a panacea and a disease all rolled into one.
Some years ago, Abdulkareem Adisa, a retired Nigerian general, provided an anecdote that was as fitting an illustration of the matter as any. By way of background: in the days of the Ibrahim Babangida dictatorship, Mr. Adisa presided as a military governor of Oyo State. Then, under the regime of the bespectacled General Sani Abacha, Mr. Adisa’s profile rose, not so much in affect as in notoriety. He became Nigeria’s Minister of Works and a self-aggrandizing member of the powerful inner circle of the Abacha despotism. His ministerial tenure was marked by what some critics regarded as an era of inflated contracts, mediocre work, and abandoned projects. Nobody could fairly accuse him, for example, of rising to the challenge of maintaining the country’s highways much less overseeing the building of new, durable ones.
If Mr. Adisa exhibited mastery in any sector at all, it was in the sheer accumulation of wealth. By the time he left office, swept away by the gale of a disesteeming melodrama, he’d become a preening, self-satisfied man of means. Yet, all that wealth did not spare him the humiliation of a ridiculous fall from grace, if men like him could ever be said to be possessed of grace. He was named in an apparently phantom plot to overthrow Mr. Abacha, his erstwhile pal and benefactor. The regime, which seemingly orchestrated the plot in order to test the loyalty of some insiders, let it be known that Mr. Adisa – once summoned by Mr. Abacha and confronted with evidence of his disloyalty – had buckled, hastened to his knees, and let out a torrent of tears and wails in a ludicrous gesture of contrition.
Had Mr. Abacha not died quite suddenly, as the absurd drama of the so-called coup had yet to reach its finale, many believed that Mr. Adisa and his cast of “disloyal” cohorts, would have been killed. Thanks to the dictator’s death, Mr. Adisa emerged from detention and soon after slipped into the role of kingmaker. In the prelude to the 2003 presidential election, he became one of the most visible ex-generals and government functionaries championing Mr. Babangida’s presidential ambitions. Parlaying his financial fortune into political “muscle,” he was not shy to let it be known that he was a veritable, Nigerian-made stakeholder. He was cross with reporters and Nigerians who brought up the questions of Mr. Babangida’s overwhelming unpopularity. At every turn, he underscored that it was the place of his ilk – and not really up to voters – to decide who was to rule us. In the rare moments when he remembered that there were millions of other Nigerians, it was to remind us that these millions were his – and other stakeholders’ – “people.”
Then, in an interview he gave to a Nigerian publication, Mr. Adisa offered a telling anecdote. Asked if it was true that he, a general, had reduced himself to tears before Mr. Abacha, Mr. Adisa offered no apologies. Who would feed and take care of “my people,” he asked the reporter, if he had allowed himself to get executed. When the interviewer stated that posterity would record that he became a wheedling, spineless caricature at a critical moment, Mr. Adisa reached for an easily translatable metaphor. He reminded the interview that the oyibo – white people – invented both the pencil and the eraser. The implication was clear: that the inscriptions of history were easily erasable.
Mr. Adisa was in an automobile accident in 2005, on a stretch of road he might have maintained in his ministerial days. Gravely injured, he was flown to the UK, one of the locations where Nigerian “stakeholders” go for medical care. His eraser was unable to hold off death.
In the particular context of Nigeria, that Adisaian argument about the eraser often appears irrefutable. It often seems that memory – an abiding awareness of events and experiences – is untenable in Nigeria. A friend of mine even once suggested that Nigerians are, on the whole, allergic to memory, hostile to the human enterprise of remembering. The price of this allergy is, of course, that (Chinua Achebe memorably reminded us), we no longer know when the rain began to beat us. That gap, I suggest, accounts for a great deal of national inertia, our incapacity to do anything to shield ourselves from the buffeting storms.
Still, I have the sneaking feeling that Nigerians are not altogether as bereft of memory as it is fashionable to suggest. Instead, it is more the case that our lives have become such a relentless cascade of absurd events that the psyche would simply come apart if it did not find a mechanism for deflecting the incessant, stormy shock. Think about the parade of horrors that’s become part and parcel of Nigerians’ everyday experience: gruesome road accidents; police shootings of innocent people, sometimes on account of disputes over N20 bribes; death by Boko Haram explosives; lecturers who demand sex or cash in exchange for good grades; students who offer sex or cash in lieu of hard work; civil servants who pocket billions in public funds entrusted in their care; National Assembly members who won’t give a straight answer about their entitlements (for the reason that these payments are both excessive and bear no relationship to output); local government officials, governors and the president who stow away hundreds of millions each month in “security votes” – and then pocket huge contract sums as well; highways daubed with a thin film of tar and declared “constructed”; neighborhoods swallowed by flood water; civil servants and private sector employees who go for months without pay; civil servants and private sector employers who go for months without putting in a decent day’s job; daily traffic jams that seem choreographed from hell; hospitals stripped of equipment; hospitals where high bills and death are the only guarantees; school buildings in such dismal shape that class conscious rodents abandon them for classless cockroaches; urban shanties surrounded by clogged, brackish gutters; visitations by armed robbers and kidnappers – and so on.
The mind is capacious, sure. Yet, the sheer challenge of processing and holding in the traumas of daily life in Nigeria is a recipe for disaster. It may well be the case, then, that Nigerians remember and remember sharply those who misshape their lives. Even so, they must feign forgetfulness and laughter in order to go from one day to the next. The question that should trouble the Adisas of Nigeria – with their pencil and eraser metaphor – is this: what happens when the people realize that laughter and (seeming) forgetting have not served them? What happens when, inevitably, there’s fire on the mountain?
Saharareporters.com

SR Speaks: Finance Minister Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala’s Economy of Lies


Federal minister of finance, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala
By SaharaReporters, New York
SaharaReporters received a statement signed by Paul C. Nwabuikwu, a senior aide to Nigeria’s Finance Minister, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, in response to our recent report on the dire financial crisis in Nigeria.

Instead of addressing our factual reporting of the declining fortune of the Nigerian economy, the minister resorted to her accustomed pettiness and name-calling.
She recently exhibited the same trait when she got Yushau Shuiab, a spokesperson for the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA), fired from his job after he wrote an article questioning her lopsided appointments and accusing her of abuse of office.

Ms. Okonjo-Iweala comes across as intolerant of facts, blinded by an ambition to be hailed in foreign circles as the answer to Nigeria’s economic woes, and driven by an excessive opportunism that disdains stark reality. 

We affirm that our recent report, like others in the past focusing on the Nigerian economy, was the product of painstaking investigation, undertaken to expose corruption, lies and deceit perpetrated by Nigerian officials to hoodwink unsuspecting Nigerians that a transformation was taking place in their lives. This website speaks to numerous knowledgeable and reliable sources, in government and out, within Nigeria and abroad.
Their conclusion is that the so-called transformation trumpeted by Ms. Okonjo-Iweala and other functionaries of the Goodluck Jonathan administration is phony. Using their insight into the policies and actions of the government, they insist that Nigerians are materially worse off today than at any time in the recent past as a result of economic mismanagement and large scale graft, the hallmarks of the Jonathan regime.

During Ms. Okonjo-Iweala first tour of duty as finance minister under ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo, she pursued an aggressive debt repayment agenda, handing over more than $12 billion of Nigeria’s scarce funds to repay debts of doubtful origin. To justify that scam against the Nigerian people, Ms. Okonjo-Iweala boasted that, with the debt payment accomplished, Nigeria was in a position to save $1 billion per year, pledging that the monies would be invested in developing infrastructure.
Nigerians now wonder: Where are the $1 billion annual savings Ms. Okonjo-Iweala promised Nigerians in 2006? Where are the roads? Where are the new hospitals? Where are the significant improvements in the state of maternity care she promised Nigerians in 2006?
In 2007, when Ms. Okonjo-Iweala was giving esoteric speeches about the economic magic she and her colleagues were achieving for Nigerians, the exchange rate of the naira to the US dollar was 120 to one; today it is 160 naira to a dollar.
At a 2007 TED conference, Ms. Okonjo-Iweala disclosed that Nigeria had 40 billion in foreign reserves. Today, with rising oil prices in the international market, she admits that Nigeria only has $48 billion in the reserve.

Ms. Okonjo-Iweala has stepped into the role of chief obfuscator on the economy, encouraged no doubt by her ability to get away for so long with deception on and misrepresentation of the true condition of the Nigerian economy. We, however, refuse to be impressed by her steady string of fictional claims about a supposedly vibrant Nigerian economy.

It ought to be recorded that Ms. Okonjo-Iweala oversaw an era of some of the most reckless acts of corruption and heists of the Nigerian commonwealth in her first four years as finance minister under Mr. Obasanjo’s hypocritical administration. Under her watch, Nigeria attained bogus economic progress where numbers, charts and fake stats were frequently displayed and deployed to fool the unwary and the gullible. 
 
Meanwhile, under Mr. Obasanjo’s and her noses, billions of dollars of public funds were stolen in the name of “investments” to upgrade Nigeria’s electric grid. She helped to dispense import waivers to dubious businessmen and churches, an exercise that cost Nigeria a fortune.
 
Since Ms. Okonjo-Iweala’s second coming as minister, complete with the bizarre title of “coordinating” minister she crafted for herself, Nigeria’s economic condition has worsened.

Tell, where is the evidence of economic growth and buoyancy when almost six states of the Nigerian federation have been paralyzed by Islamist insurgency? Where is the sign of economic vitality when half of Nigeria’s oil production is stolen by crude robbers, most of them elements close to President Jonathan? Which foreign investors are pouring money into a country where the electrical grid has  nearly collapsed and at a time when the few local industries are moving to countries like Ghana and Benin?

Does Ms. Okonjo-Iweala calculate that most of the “vulture capital” operations run by some of her former colleagues that are selling bonds to Nigeria at cut throat prices can be considered investors even when they are already pulling out their funds and ripping Nigeria apart?

Where else in the world would an economy grow at 6.5% and yet fail to provide jobs for more than half of its youths? How is the economy working when Nigerian soldiers participating in peacekeeping operations in neighboring countries have to beg locals for food? If the Nigerian economy is “sound,” how come workers are being owed salaries? Why have many pensioners not been paid their entitlements after retirement? What explains the fact that ministries and parastatals have lately not received their allocations? 

If the economy is sparkling, why are Nigerian roads so bad? Why were they not fixed in the years Ms. Okonjo-Iweala has been practicing her economic wizardry? Which economy can survive the greed of a President Jonathan and his inner circle?
Today, Mr. Jonathan has pardoned corrupt former governors and other officials that Ms. Okonjo-Iweala condemned in 2007; the pardoned men now sit across the table from the president and his cabinet to further destroy Nigeria.

Which economy can survive such full-throttle promotion of corruption?

The questions for Ms. Okonjo-Iweala are many, but we are content to ask her to provide to the public a profile of the last four years of Nigeria’s so-called foreign reserves? If Nigeria has $48 billion in such reserves and it is a sign that our economy is buoyant, why does Nigeria have to borrow, even if interest-free loans?

Why does the minister designate the foreign reserve in US dollars but the so-called “Excess Crude” account in naira? And if the excess crude account was N5 billion, what was it when Ms. Okonjo-Iweala became finance minister?
 
We are surprised that it took Ms. Okonjo-Iweala several years to understand that Saharareporters is “activist media,” a tag we wear as a badge of honor.
Our mode of reporting scrutinizes official versions of events; we question the actions and policies of government officials; we have developed an ever-growing network of sources who avail us of the innermost secrets and deals of those in power because they trust us to report fearlessly and to protect their identity; we believe in speaking truth to power; and we always crosscheck statements made by sources before publishing accounts. We continue to demand openness and transparency in the conduct of governmental affairs; and we demand that Nigerians be allowed to feel the impact of any so-called economic growth, not in carefully manipulated press statements, bar charts and economic ratings and projections, but in the manner it impacts positively on their daily lives.

Ms. Okonjo-Iweala may lash out all she wants and choose to operate as an economic hit-woman, but we are not fazed. We will continue to beam a searchlight on her handling of the economy, including calling attention to her hypocritical role in empowering a cartel in the fuel import business, a cartel whose depredations she criticizes in the media when it suits her agenda.


Full Text Of Mrs. Okonjo Iweala's Response to SaharaReporters Report on the Nigerian economy: ECONOMY: THE LIES OF SAHARAREPORTERS


We have received several enquiries about a story titled “Nigerian Government broke; targets pension savings” posted on the website of Saharareporters.

The story, like many other recent articles by Saharareporters purporting to be exclusive stories on various aspects of the Nigerian economy, is a complete fabrication.


As Nigerians know, the administration of President Goodluck Jonathan recently presented its mid-term report which is a forthright account of the achievements as well as challenges facing the economy.

The country has $48 billion in reserves, including N5 billion in the Excess Crude Account to help shore up the economy. So the idea that the country is broke is alarmist.

It is true that the country is experiencing some revenue shortfalls that everyone knows about due to oil theft for which the President is taking some serious measures.


Also, contrary to the claim in the story that the country has borrowed from local and international banks to finance recurrent spending, the Jonathan administration has in fact reversed the tendency of borrowing to finance recurrent as was the practice in the past.

Also untrue is the claim that the country has been downgraded by international ratings agencies. In fact the truth is the exact opposite; ratings agencies and international investors have consistently stated, through various platforms, that the Nigerian economy is a well-managed one with good prospects in the medium and long term.


Regarding the country’s debt situation, the overall picture is positive as the Coordinating Minister showed clearly in her recent well publicized statement. The multi-dimensional strategy adopted by the Jonathan administration is leading to positive outcomes.

The level of borrowing has been brought down, bonds are being paid off through a sinking fund and the country is not taking the kind of high interest loans that led to the debt burden which existed before the historic Paris Club debt deal. The Borrowing Plan which was approved by State Governors and the National Assembly is focused on financing power transmission projects, inter and intra city rail projects, dams and other key infrastructure.


The notion that the Jonathan government is “eyeing” the N3.4 trillion pension funds to finance deficits underscores the desperation of this “activist” medium and its sponsors. It is a total invention. In fact, the government is currently engaged in strengthening institutions and critical processes in the sector to enhance security and stability of the funds.


With this latest outing, Saharareporters has reinforced its well-earned reputation as a discredited purveyor of falsehood.


Paul C. Nwabuikwu
Special Adviser to the Coordinating Minister

Prophets and Men of God


0101Okey Ikechukwu backpagex - AKIN-OSUNTOKUN-Back-Pg-New.jpg

By Okey Ikechukwu, Email: okey.ikechukwu@thisdaylive.com

Several reactions have trailed the article “The Catholic I Was”, which appeared in this column last week. There was also a strong online debate on the matter, an aspect of which needs to be clarified here. Because one of the chief protagonists in the online debate has the same first name, ‘Okey,’ as the author, some of the commentators assumed that they were still having the exchanges with the author of the article. This is incorrect. Besides the published article, which conveys my personal views about the issues under reference, I have not made any other contribution on the matter. It is in the public domain and we are all at liberty to take various positions on it.
But the circumstance made me feel the need to share the following thoughts, given that the issues in contention in the aforementioned article are largely of a spiritual nature; with snatches of non-spiritual considerations filtering in here and there. Today’s further discussion has nothing whatsoever to do with the Ahiara matter, but takes up the more serious question of how teeming humanity must begin to itself think in earnest about the growing epidemic of “Men of God”. In the following dialogue, a perplexed young man, John, takes up issues with his uncle on the role of prophets and their purpose in the life of man.
John: From what you said during our last discussion, I want to know what makes a prophet different from other human beings. Is it education, or what?
Uncle: No one becomes a prophet simply because of learning, or any honours conferred by men. All true prophets are messengers of the Almighty and they come to this earth as teachers, moderators of values and agents of spiritual enlightenment.
John: Does it then mean that everyone with any type of spiritual insight is thereby a prophet?
Uncle: Of course not! No one can become a prophet simply by calling himself one.
John: But someone can become a prophet by attending a school of theology, for instance, or by undergoing religious and priesthood training.
Uncle: There is no true prophet anywhere in the world who became a prophet simply because he was trained by men. There is always something extra. Even where a prophet is known to have passed through some of the teachings of his society before awakening to his calling, this is only in order for him to know the limit of their knowledge and their way of life; so that he can give them comprehensive spiritual help, for a new level of consciousness.
John: If a prophet does not get his knowledge from the schools and people of his time, can we then say that he is the source of that knowledge himself?
Uncle: No, he is only a messenger and not necessarily the source of the knowledge he brings. He merely serves as a transmitter of what sometimes lies far above him. But because he has the calling and blessing of the Lord, he can teach and reveal much to his people. Meanwhile, what he is revealing is new knowledge mediated to him to transmit for their benefit. It has to be first mediated to him, before he can pass it on; unless he is a false prophet.
John: So a prophet is only a transmitter and not an originator, so to say?
Uncle: As it concerns what is mediated to mankind, yes. A prophet’s ‘knowledge’ and wisdom do not come from learning, or research. But they still come from a Source other than the prophet himself. It is given to him; and sometimes after supplication.
John: I see. Can you now explain in some detail why we need prophets on earth?
Uncle: Since prophets are teachers of new spiritual knowledge, it follows that the reason we need them is for us to be on the right path spiritually.
John: So what does that add to our life on earth?
Uncle: The answer must be linked with why we are here on earth in the first place.
John: Yes, why are we in this world?
Uncle: Let us first say that we are more than flesh and blood. . .
John: But what have prophets got to do with it all?
Uncle: As messengers of the Creator, prophets are sent from time to time to teach and guide the different races and human societies, depending on their level of development at the particular time. It is the spirit inside the physical body, and which lives after physical death, that is the target of spiritual enlightenment.
John: So the body is like a garment the soul wears when it is here in the world of matter?
Uncle: Yes, and the putting aside of the body when it is old or damaged is what we call death. … Just as earthly food and drink nourish and strengthen the physical body, so does spiritual knowledge serve as food for the spirit of man.
John: You are saying that it is prophets who bring this spiritual nourishment for man?
Uncle: Yes…but not always. It may come in the form of prophets or wise leaders who incarnate to guide a group of human beings to new levels of spiritual understanding … to bridge the knowledge-gap of the people.
John: Is that why there is always some story about special wise men or women in almost all known cultures, at one time or another?
Uncle: Yes! They bring new knowledge, or rise to warn at great turning points in a people’s existence. They are not appointed, or proclaimed, by men. They also do not need anyone’s approval to be what the Lord has appointed them to be.
John: But why is it that we human beings cannot decide on our own whether someone is a prophet or not?
Uncle: Because it is not the place of kindergarten students to draw up a curriculum to assess (and approve) the credentials of their teachers! It is also not the place of a creature to be the approving authority for what comes from its Creator. The messengers and wise ones we mentioned earlier would still be what they are whether men said so or not. That is why men’s opinion and consistent rejection of true prophets over the years does not affect the status of such prophets. Their acceptance of false prophets also ends with the collapse of the false teachings.
John: But there are historical records of prophets who held earthly positions and even served as leaders of their nations!
Uncle: Yes, but their style of leadership was always different. They tried in everything to guide men onto paths that would make them live according to the laws of the Almighty, in the course of their daily lives.
John: So what is the essential difference between a real prophet and a false one?
Uncle: A prophet is a messenger of God and a false prophet is someone who says he is the Lord’s messenger when he is not. It is as simple as that! Even if all men believe such a false prophet and proclaim him from their rooftops, he is no prophet.
John: How about some of the prophets of old who deviated from their task and were condemned for it? We can infer from this that a genuine prophet can become a false one over time.
Uncle: Yes, that can happen. The life of a prophet on earth is often a trying one and he may even be endowed with special grace for the purpose if his task. But he must remain spiritually alert, open to guidance and unconditionally loyal to the Divine Will if he is to remain on course. Once he fails in these regards, he puts everything in jeopardy.
John: So a man who is born a prophet is actually given a special talent from birth.
Uncle: Yes or, more appropriately, he is equipped for the mission and endowed before his birth on earth. But he must fulfil the purpose of the gift, or the calling...
John: Really?
Uncle: Yes … a person endowed with grace who does not fulfil his mission ceases to get any help from the Almighty; because he has closed himself to it. With that he gets no guidance and goes about pretending to know everything by himself. He is finished.
John: Ah, that explains the cases of prophets who were even later cursed because they had forsaken their mission. But what do we make of people who call themselves prophets all over the world today? Most of them have undergone some training in the scriptures and can speak well in public. Should some kind of skill not be used by the public to determine who is a prophet?
Uncle: What proof did John the Baptist give to those who did not believe him? What proof did Prophet Mohammed tender to the doubters at the beginning of his mission? The Lord has no earthly schools created to award prophetic certification, or degrees, to His messengers. They come prepared! The ability to speak well in public, or to quote the scriptures, does not make anyone a prophet, because we are told that even the devil can quote scripture.
John: How about the ability to perform miracles?
Uncle: That is no evidence that the people who perform such miracles are servants of the Almighty. They may not even believe in God. Should we call every magician a prophet simply because he can manipulate certain laws of nature in a way most people do not know? Did Simon the magician not perform almost the same miracles as the Disciples of Christ, before he was cursed, in the Bible?
John: So where does a prophetic call come from?
Uncle: It comes from the Almighty. Whoever is not sent by Him, but who nevertheless calls himself a prophet, takes the Lord’s name in vain. He will mislead the people, just like those who preach whatever they like, and call themselves ‘free thinkers’.

The foregoing are excerpts from the book “Come Let Us Reason Together”, which just came out of the press. It is the first in an on-going series known as THE DIALOGUES series. Like Dialogue series 1, from which this excerpt was taken, each edition of THE DIALOGUES consists of several chapters and each chapter, or stanza deals with some peculiar question of life. The book is out and will be available in bookshops all over the country by Tuesday next week.
 ThisDay

Why Obasanjo is Unhappy with Jonathan


By Olawale Olaleye
More facts have emerged on why former President Olusegun Obasanjo may
have assumed an anti-President Goodluck Jonathan stance, even as the
2015 intrigues continue to gather steam.
A source privy to a recent meeting where Obasanjo had expressed his
displeasure to some close allies on how President Jonathan has been
relating with him, said it all started when Obasanjo indicated his
intention to resign as the chairman, Board of Trustees (BoT) of the
Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in April last year, a situation
President Jonathan  allegedly handled poorly.
According to the source, the former president had expected the
president to engage him in order to seek clarification on why he was
leaving the office beyond the excuses he had advanced.
Commenting on the Obasanjo/Jonathan grudge, the source said the former
president was shocked when about a week after serving the notice of
his intention to resign, he received a letter from Jonathan, accepting
his resignation without either an attempt to persuade him against it
or give personal attention to the plan. Obasanjo was said to have
described President Jonathan's action as both insensitive and a
display of poor understanding of the nuances of power.
"Baba had expected that given his place in the party and especially
the role he played in his emergence, the President would have
prevailed on him not to go but stay back and help moderate things at
the highest level in the party," the source said.
Another source, however, said such a stance by Jonathan should not
have been taken seriously because he probably didn't understand that
an Obasanjo quitting as BoT chair would come with any implication and
so, "he just acted naively."
But the THISDAY source, who gave a rundown of Jonathan's alleged many
infractions against Obasanjo confirmed that a presidential emissary
had been constantly dispatched to him (Jonathan) and added that the
former president was also not happy with the way the Jonathan groups
were going about his re-election bid.
According to him, he (Obasanjo) had put a lot at stake by brokering a
one-term deal that is now being vehemently denied, adding that even if
there was plan to seek re-election, the brazen approach is certainly
counter-productive in the light of the prevailing political
developments in the country.
Obasanjo was also said to have frowned at the electioneering deal
Jonathan allegedly struck  with the opposition party in the 2011
election in the South-west,  a move he believes  could undermine the
chances of the remaining PDP governors in the South-west states.
Also, by moving against him at the party level, both at the state and
national levels, was considered a clear move by President Jonathan to
tell Obasanjo that he was no longer needed at whatever capacity,
either in the government or party.
The source recalled that apart from easing out former governor
Olagunsoye Oyinlola of Osun State as national secretary, Bode
Mustapha, as auditor-general and former Ekiti State governor, Segun
Oni, as vice-chairman of the party in the South-west zone, the PDP in
his Ogun State had also been taken away from him and handed over to
someone regarded as "unrepentantly anti-Obasanjo", Mr. Buruji Kashamu.
Worthy of note, the source mentioned, was that Obasanjo didn't take
kindly, the way Jonathan took his position on the issue of insecurity,
especially when the President was reported as saying he would not
handle the issue of terrorism the military way, alluding to Obasanjo's
invasion of Odi and Zaki Biam.
Another instance deemed condescending, according to the source, was
that Obasanjo sometime ago visited one of his farms in Cross River
State and observed that the road to the farm was in deplorable state
and immediately moved to address it.
"So, Baba expressed his disappointment to the Cross River State
governor on the state of the road but the man replied and said it was
the President that had not approved of it being a federal road.
"Right there, Baba called the president and narrated his encounter
with the governor and told the president that he had appealed to the
governor to go ahead with the road and that he'll be reimbursed by the
president, to which Jonathan was said to have replied in the
affirmative.
"But Baba was later shocked to hear that the president had sent for
the governor and dressed him down for what he considered 'reporting
him to Baba'. So, these are some of the things that people do not know
that are annoying Baba.
"It is important to note that Baba had thought that as a former
president, he would have been given the honour of nominating a
successor as BoT chairman even if he was not going to reverse his
position. But he was technically edged out.  But for  these
infractions, the source said, “Baba was not and never would have been
against the president because of the role he played in his emergence.
"It is therefore depressing for Baba that those who opposed his choice
as vice-president to the late President Yar'Adua but craved for Dr.
Peter Odili and even frustrated his coming onboard as acting president
are now the ones he relies on.
“At what point can you say Baba has gone wrong?",  he asked, adding:
"The degree of Baba's bitterness is so high now and he has decided to
keep quiet and watch."
ThisDay

Nelson Mandela: A Walk Well Walked, By Hannatu Musawa


Hannatu Musawa
Nelson Mandela is ageing and his ‘spirit and sparkle’ is fading, his wife has said, as it is disclosed that South Africa’s former president is hospitalized on life support, suffering from a recurring lung infection. Millions all over the world yet again hold their breath at the news that the Madiba, one of the greatest moral and political international heroes of our time, is ill and fighting for his life.
Nelson Mandela feels more like a father than a famous figure to the likes of myself, who throughout our lives recognize him as the central persona in one of the most gripping and moving political dramas in the world. His story has been one of strife, great effort, obstacle, new hope, and the ultimate achievement. And even in the midst of his darkest days, he demonstrated with vigour the task of a great leader, by leading his country from the shallow hole it was in, to the elevated heights of freedom. He did this with the spirit of a saint and a perception of strength, bravery, generosity, courage and forgiveness. Nelson Mandela is a true freedom fighter whose love for his people has no end and whose life and personal success will be remembered long after the world has forgotten the evils of the oppression that once engulfed his people. He is a star who has brightened the lives of many and set the ultimate example for all leaders in Africa, because he is one who will not compromise his people’s cause for self-interest. The radiance of his personality has touched the lives of many over the years and we hope to continue drinking from his river of humanity as we pray he pulls through.
In a role seldom witnessed in Africa, he selflessly dedicated his life to fight against one of the most powerful systems of oppression ever conceived, and today he stands as a decisive testimony to the victory of nobility and hope over desolation and odium, of forgiveness and love over revenge and hate. His life personifies what a true patriot should do and how they should behave under the most trying of circumstances. The spirits of all the revolutionaries and freedom fighters of this world, past and present, surely would smile blessings upon him because he always stood fair against all kinds of domination and was willing to give his life for it. In his own words, Nelson Mandela once said, “I have fought against white domination and against black domination. I have cherished the ideal of a free society in which all live together in harmony, with equal opportunities. It is an ideal which I hope to live for and achieve. But if needs be, it is an ideal for which I am prepared to die”.
Growing up in South Africa as a young black boy in the first half of the last century must have been a real ordeal as a result of apartheid. Blacks were segregated, abused, persecuted and treated little better than animals. The apartheid regime enacted laws that regarded them accordingly. But despite such adversity, Nelson Mandela was always a fighter from a young age. Instead of accepting this unreasonable system of government, he made the decision to resist and began his lifelong journey to free South Africa from the shackles of repression. Little did he know that his resolve back then would lead to the demise of apartheid, pave the road to the presidency and the ultimate honor of a Nobel Peace Award. Today, thanks to the personal effort and sacrifice of men such as Mandela, South Africa is a free state with equal opportunities for all its citizens and the pride of Africa.
Of all his sacrifices, the most heart-wrenching is without a doubt the sacrifice of his private life and youth for his people. I once read an interview with one of his daughters in which she described the solitude of growing up with a father that was incarcerated and branded terrorist by the government, and the loneliness of having to share him with the whole of South Africa upon his release. But even before his incarceration, Mandela was forced to live apart from his family. In an attempt to survive and evade the authorities, Mandela moved from place to place and adopted a number of camouflages. He became so good at avoiding the authorities that were stationed in every nook and cranny that at a point he was labeled the ‘black pimpernel’.
His childhood and upbringing could not have been more apt for the life-role he was to play. He was born in the South African town of Qunu, Transkei in 1918. His father, Henry Mandela, was chief councillor to the acting paramount chief in his town. When his father died, Mandela became the chief’s ward and was groomed for the chieftainship. From a young age he and his lifelong friend and fellow freedom fighter Oliver Tambo were driven to participate in the fight to free their people. As a student he was said to both be extremely studious and ambitious and eventually ended up starting a BA degree. However in 1940, during the course of his degree, he was expelled from University for actively participating in a student strike. He went on to complete his degree by doing a correspondence course after which he enrolled to become a lawyer. After joining the ANC, he helped found the youth league of the party in 1944. He put in many years of dedication to his cause and eventually became head of the defiance-campaign of the party. This empowered him to travel across the country to organize a resistance to discriminatory legislation campaign. During this period he was arrested and confined a couple of times but that didn’t stop him from forming individual underground cells of the ANC upon his release.
In addition, he and Oliver Tambo proceeded to open the first black legal firm in the country and even though the Law Society was petitioned to strike Mandela off the roll of barristers, his law firm and career survived. In 1960, after the Sharpeville massacre and after his release from yet another detention, Mandela as leader of the military wing of the ANC went underground to lead a campaign for a new national convention. By 1962 he went to Algeria for military training and to build a militia but upon his return he was arrested. On a charge of leaving the country illegally and incitement to strike Mandela conducted his own defence but lost and was convicted for five years in November 1962. It was during the service of that sentence he and seven others, Walter Sisulu, Dennis Goldberg, Govan Mbeki, Raymond Mhlaba, Elias Mosoaledi, Andrew Mlangeni and Ahmed Kathrada, were charged with sabotage and sentenced to life imprisonment. During this trial Mandela’s resolve never faulted and he continuously told the court; “I do not deny that I planned sabotage. I did not plan it in a spirit of recklessness nor for the love of violence but as a result of a sober assessment of the political situation that had arisen after many years of tyranny, exploitation and oppression of my people by the whites.” But despite their defence the judge remained convinced that their behaviour was not borne out of a need for the attainment of equal rights for the African people but out of a warped desire for revolution and personal ambition. Luckily for the world he stopped short of imposing the supreme penalty of death and instead opted for life imprisonment. While in prison, Mandela never compromised his political principles and was always a source of strength for the other prisoners. The apartheid government numerously offered Mandela the reduction of his sentence as long as he abided by certain conditions, but every time they offered, Mandela would refuse on the notion that “prisoners were not able to enter into contracts, only free men could negotiate”.
Decades into his struggle for the liberation of black and colored people in South Africa, Mandela, together with Walter Sisulu, Dennis Goldberg, Govan Mbeki, Raymond Mhlaba, Elias Mosoaledi, Andrew Mlangeni and Ahmed Kathrada, was charged with sabotage and sentenced to life imprisonment. While in prison, Mandela never compromised his political principles. The apartheid government numerously offered Mandela the reduction of his sentence as long as he abided by certain conditions, but every time they offered, Mandela would refuse on the notion that ‘…only free men could negotiate.’
After decades of prison labor, Nelson Mandela and his colleagues were eventually released on February 11, 1990. On that bright day, at 4:14pm, almost an hour late, a jubilant Mandela, dressed in a light brown suit and tie and holding Winnie’s hand, appeared at the gates of his prison, smiled at the ecstatic crowds and punched the air in a victory salute before taking a silver BMW Sedan to freedom. With his tenacity unblemished, he went back to his life’s work, determined to end the struggle he and others had set out to do almost four decades earlier. In 1991, at the first national conference of the ANC held inside South Africa, Mandela was elected president of the party. On May 10, 1994, he won and became the first democratically elected president of South Africa. And, unlike most other African leaders, even though he was at the apex, he retired in June 1999 and relinquished power with no fuss after only one term in office.
Before being admitted to hospital, he was known to peacefully reside in his birth place with his third wife, Graca, where his most private moments were filled by his greatest pleasure: watching the sun set while listening to classical music and reading to his grandchildren. Accounts suggest he usually got up by 4:30am, exercised by 5am and took breakfast of plain porridge, fresh fruit and fresh milk by 6:30am while reading the days newspapers.
Despite severe provocation, Mandela never answered racism with racism but symbolized the triumph of the human spirit over man’s inhumanity to man. His life has been an inspiration to all who are oppressed and deprived and to all who are opposed to oppression and deprivation. He has never wavered in his devotion to democracy, equality and justice.
Words cannot describe how blessed this generation is to have lived during the times of a man like Mandela. I and millions of people around the world who love him dearly have learned so much from him and will continue to cherish him. If the world can have more people like him, it, indeed, would be a much better place to live in. He reminds me of a late woman named Hajia Wowo that I loved so much. But more than that, when I think of him, I do not see a person; I see an institution of goodness and a beacon of strength…I see my conscience!
In his autobiography, ‘Long Walk to Freedom,’ Mandela describes his struggle as a journey, and of that journey he says, “I have walked that long road to freedom. I have tried not to falter; I have made missteps along the way. But I have discovered the secret that after climbing a great hill, one only finds that there are many more hills to climb. I have taken a moment here to rest, to steal a view of the glorious vista that surrounds me, to look back on the distance I have come. But I can rest only for a moment, for with freedom comes responsibilities, and I dare not linger, for my long walk is not yet ended.”
And indeed, as we pray for his fast recovery or peaceful passing, for the great Madiba it has been, for the last nine decades, a walk well walked!
Nigeriaworld.com

PROLOGUE: POUNDED YAM FESTIVAL!


advertisement


"Though no checks to a new evil appear, the checks exist and will appear." ---Ralph Waldo Emerson.
BB let me commence this letter with an enlightenment dint-dose of metaphorical philosophia in man's mystical chemistry of existence and essence. Call this what you will, but be sprightly wheeled away from the weedily way-laying notion that it should boast its broad base in biology or theology. All doctrines and theories are its offspring; it requires no myths to be meaningful, no culture is needed for its instructive accuracy. Yet, all myths and cultures, from it have drawn their etymologies, scopes and functions. All books and schools, all skills and fields, with it they boast affiliations, and to it they owe their relevances. Stones and bones, sticks and spears, swords and guns, temples and caves, churches and mosques, all in its protection early minds had toiled. For it, ages were graded; powers were garnered, given and questioned. And that its beautiful substance might be our rules, laws and knowledge were made; and that their purposes may rob off well on the central man, policing professions and insightful institutions were created to identify its banes as taboos, crimes or illegalities. This, in my unique and most intellectually and spiritually consoling description I call Samaformism. And, Babangida, for this decent doctrine-ideology via which Humanity Day was annually begun for man on the 17th of March, 2007, for which healthcare and educational facilities are being explored to be freely used by all, for which movement ought to be restrictless or common joy ought to be shared by all, all lives, including mine and yours, have been evolved and empowered to be.

As a growing child in the eighties, let me tell you how hero-crazy, heroism-addicted I was on a piece of Nigerian earth. Admiring our excellent actors and actresses from their guissepuous representation of warriors or warlords in inspiring epic movies, their causes and courage pillared in my soul, the sole-strength of hope in wholesome degrees and pedigrees that marked me out as a move maker among my precocious peers. No evening passed me by without gathering my little friends, all gladly clad in our different wears but common mood, poetically inspired for battles our different parents always prevented or incessantly ended with strokes of their curious canes.

Oh remind me dear Lord, how many times mother's hands had been filled with blood because the sharp objects I, like a true warrior fortified against defeat, had hidden in the jungles of my small-sized shirts and shorts to house my passion in the childish illusion of heroism and victory mien of a mere child. And though I would feel bad that these blades and sharpened spears cut mother as she constantly washed for me, my sincere remorse never prevented me from converting more garbs into war rags, and from smuggling more 'weapons' into their corners, which always cut mother more. I loved knights and warriors, courage and freedom, their impacts and stories, a great deal!

In later years, this fraternity with nobility and freedom, courage and heroism snowballed from movie characters to real life's constitutionally constituted and professionally coordinated soldiers who vigilantly and valiantly man the security of man in this region. Your picture was frequently among those which filled my heart with hope, and I loved you as my first known image of national spartanism.

I would go to school, relaying some cock and bull stories about your physical and moral strengths. I told my more-trusting than gullible classmates how fine and dutiful you were, IBB; I said to them you could provide for Nigerians and fight any nation or international organization to a stand still, which oppressively attempted to engage the idea of ideal Nigeria with your mortal kicks and punches, guns and bombs. I unwittingly exaggerated our resources and argued the Nigerian soldier was invincible. These were my immature, yet true perception of all notable figures that I first knew in our nation's annals.

A fine story farmer that I was, my young friends believed these rare and virtuous plants were true and possible with the over-bloated agriculture in you. I never meant to lie; I completely believed you possessed all these and more. They were the expectations and hopes from the wholesome soul of a trusting child that most children are.

Then suddenly, a revolutionary realization of my misleading perception of your personality (like my maturely altered convictions of those movie stars of earlier years) in pharmacological scientia of cathartic psychological drugs, exposing some critical truth that my innocent infancy had mis-worshipped as noble feat, mutated my funny folly to phenomenal perspicacity that efficiently perceives and detects every smoke-screening moral and spiritual camouflages.

First I observed only the fine fools around our home and school, whose best judgment maggots of carcass might be too intelligent to trust, praised your deeds. I suspected your disguised insincerity through the published symbols of your fans' naked dauncehood. Second, I noticed some disciplined teachers and exemplary elders in cross-fire arguments against your worthlessness. I was gradually becoming convinced of your standard moral sub-standardness through the consistent verdicts of dignified Nigerians who were never identifiable with ethical kwashiorkor, or direct dishonour. Third I saw your vivid pictures as a cun instructor, fraud elaborator and the nation's historic inspiration of euphemistic corruption; I saw the flakily faked moral mien that masqueraded a mind that was motivated for courage-dismembered Mephistopheles, a heart acting for the upkeep of hell's large flame, and a soul sold out in unprofitable mortgage of the lachrymal anguish of broken Nigerians.

What class of an evil genius are you, IBB? Mortals who know not are innocent, but are inferior to the holders of things they don't. Those who know and still reign below the charms of the hope of what they know ought to be scolded at a rate untold. Noble and disciplined action, call it righteousness if you choose, is the only acceptable proof of whatever we believe and know. The man or woman is depraved and base, whom knowledgeable awareness befriends but elects to reign in the kingdom of the optional vanities of all that ignorance and sabotage provide. Besides, by burying evil actions unacted, no man ever ruined his own future. And, to learn before, or in anticipation of life's challenges is the best timing of knowledge. Those who learn in the face of challenges learn truly but at the expense of deadly personal sacrifices; those who learn after it already lose the fruits of the challenges their feeble power fall for. But no matter when we learn, and irrespective of the consequences of this season, we must learn still, and apply this learning to the noblest calling of knowledge-the well-being of the traumatized world.

You it was who banked on the indisciplined-tolerance of Nigerians of the time to overthrow the Buhari/Idiagbon's malediction-importing administration. Throughout your reign, governance dividends were lean, and as if for famine you forcefully lorded it over our sovereignty and explored our territories, you replaced several mighty errors with more pronounced epochal, epochal frauds. Several citizens were severely sacrificed to sustain the unpopular rituals of your demonic morals. Your countlessly eclipsed crimes and terror-reforms Babangidaized Abacha who willfully Abachanized Nigerians!

Through the gentle strokes of weakening hunger and spirit-diminishing hopelessness, thousands abandoned the Nigerian space for the grave, insanity, crimes or foreign places. I was nine in 1985, but my unnarrowable brain can never net-off the oven-effects of your maniacal policy via Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP), the landmark insincerity of your empty, supercilious unification projects, the implied indoctrination of theft and massive institutionalization of corruption, the depraved legalization of vandalization, the heroic looting of our integrity, resources and promises, and the robustly insane annulment of the freest and fairest election in all of our tortuous history.

IBB, you are a meretriciously imperious man. You told Nigerians you were stepping aside in the heat of the 1993 June twelve election crises as if you were so certain of coming back to power. Do you think of the possibility of Nigerians cornering you cheap wit, or of death, or even of the God you confess faith in at all?

All of the public interviews you had granted have been displays of your ignorance and arrogance. You would not apologize for the wrong done; contrary to what you said when you came to power as a youth, that power belongs to the young, you later held that Nigerian youths are foolish and irrelevant to the leadership of their fatherland. At what age did Gowon, Obasanjo, and you rule Nigeria? And I challenge you to prove to the world, how exactly you are better than the worst of the Nigerian youths. The leader who squanders chances of general survival at the ritual point of expedience and realism is worse than the supremely supine youth whom socio-economic despondency precludes from living an ethically excellent existence.

You are a fool of the first order. You are a betrayer per excellence. You must have been struck with a psychotic inanity of the most aggravated species! You are a hollow billow of nature's empty negations. You are the wreckless exception to heaven's outstanding beauty. Your spiritual worth dangles between zero and one percent on the Spiritometre of out joint essence. Taken out of your stolen material wealth, your head and heart, plus all other organs you boast as a human beast, serve no purpose attributed to an average mortal of logic. You are a waste to your kinsmen and race, and a major inspirer of hate in a convalescing age of joint aids and love. Being the leading logic of the devil, your essence is the fashionable immortalization of Nigeria and all that is good on the planet of man. Let it be recorded in the books of beauty-conscious historians that unless you change by revealing the sleazes and evils you had fostered in Nigeria and apologize for them, I who blunderously loved you as a child, now wholeheartedly detest you as an adult.

Why not? You were given the chance by fate to fan flat the lethiferous hurdles on the survival path of your people. It was a rare privilege that Nigerians heartily welcomed you in 1985 despite your coming to our revered throne through a process frowned against by our civilization and moral taste. You, along with Olusegun Obasanjo, Sani Abacha, Mohamadu Buhari, Abubakar Rimi, Earnest Shonekan, OluFalae, Arthur Nzeribe, Maurice Iwu, Bode George, Tafa Balogun, etc. etc., are the worst maledictional anathema in the long annals of Nigeria.

Your dignity-absent scholars have said that they defend you "…for the good reason a sane man would defend late Chief Obafemi Awolowo, Chief Anthony Enhahoro, and late Chief Ajibola Ige-whose infamous war doctrine of hunger and starvation are instruments of war" was well-articulated to General Yakubu Gowon during his prosecution of the civil war and which drove a million of Igbo children to their untimely grave. He understands the politics of Nigeria of yesterday, today, and probably tomorrow, and he would probably play very crucial roles in determining the political course of the country."

I have no doubt in my mind as well that the civil war was Nigeria's most horrible dance in naked moral and ideological cluelessness before the world (if this was what patriotically pains your accolades); and all those who have supported it with their planned theatre of mindless executions-Gowon, Awolowo, Obasanjo, Ojukwu, Enhahoro, etc. etc.,--no matter how unimpeachable they seem to us, shall have the columns of their guilts in our history. But note that a withdrawal of support for that war is not an express approval of secession. The Nigerian union is not a burdensome political phenomenon to be endured or preserved at all cost; it is a cherished redemption-temple to the construction of which every citizen submits a plan. However guilty these Nigerians are for the roles they played in the civil war, none of them, I boldly assert, was as meteor-devoid as you, who destroying the most beautiful electoral resolve of one of the most diverse nations of the world, insist they are foolish enough to deserve a worse political nightmare in your proposed accursed return. Neither Gowon nor Ojukwu ever insinuated a return to any of Nigeria's political thrones after the civil war.

Contrary to what your spiritually waned apostles of political come back say of you that, "So I say to detractors: hate him, dislike him, abuse him, disabuse him; one thing that is prevalent about him is his propensity to disarm your aggression with his gap-toothed smile and humility. This is unprecedented in a former president. The man is not an actor but a soldier's soldier", you are a man of fake frankness who neither says what he feels nor feel what he says. Your gap-toothed smile is a mere expression of some tragodia in unparalleled sadism. You are a deeply committed adherent of active arrogance showcased in passive form. You feign humility to disguise your cruelty and spit fire to appear courageous to the easily scared.

You represent for all the taught military theories and tactics in our strong army, a soldier of cowards. For, who but a cowardly soldier, neglecting the honour of ideal strength, wins by means of deception and lie, complicity and duplicity? The Athenians and the Spartans announced before they attacked any of their enemies, winning still; the English found it unethical to attack the defenceless. But all of your battles, because you have read the unpalatable likes of Greenian and Machiavellian theories of survival by deceits, you had waged through the weapons of pretences and empty smiles.

Your drafted-for-shame loyalists also cited some newspapers and Nigerian personalities as supporting and praising your all. The press praise (August 29th, 1985-The New Nigerian; August 30th, 1985-Daily Times and National Concord) was intellectually based on ill-judgment, blunderously based on trust. These newspapers and journalists, in their shallowness-blessed assessment, thought you were a rational man who had come to fill their nation's air with the perfume of freedom after their draconian, dictatorial handling by the duo of Buhari and Idiagbon. They believed you were in power to serve as the corner-stone of needed structures that would usher in the triumph of civilized human liberation over undemocratic democracy and iron and blood policies of the military adventurers before you.

Professor Wole Soyinka was quoted among those prominent Nigerians who believe in you: "I like Babanginda's personality, sense of honour and the sincerity in his ambition. He is a sincere leader with commendable listening capacity." I strongly suspect that these words are not Wole Soyinka's; they ought not to be. And if they are, they must have been created when the charm of your spiritual deceit had a strong hold on the loving laureate. My suspicion of that Soyinka might have sympathy for your fairly fastidious folly in 2004 occasioned my Letter to Professor Wole Soyinka published on Nigeriaworld.com that time. In any case, beauty, truth and justice are the reasons celebrities and personalities enjoy the respect of the masses; no Nigerian shall leave undishonoured by Nigerians, who offers any known form of intellectual, spiritual or political assistance that fosters the confident enthronement of any popularly despised corruption mogul, nation divider, or morality resenter as leaders in Nigeria.




While Wole Soyinka is yet to make a categorical disavowal of his support for the you we all know and see, Abubakar Umar(Ex Governor of Kaduna State) cannot be held down by "IBB had 99 percent of followersip in the military; he was the kind of General whom I could follow into battle blid-folded." This gallant soldier followed you when he thought you were worthy, and honourably withdrew his loyalty when he discovered you were evil. He did not only kick against your annulment of the June 12 election results, he was countlessly seen at critical scenes, fighting against your cohorts' social sins. This man of the people was not just mad at Shonekan, he dared the acrimonious Abacha in all that daring portends. To your disappointment I know, Abubakar Umar has been a regular fire-spiting commentator in the affairs of Nigeria since your historic derailment.

I laughed as I read from your plaudit publishers that you cried for having to cancel the June 12 election. You? Cry? Interesting1! For how long? And if your tears meant that you were to potentially regret that annulment, why, why did you go ahead to still annul? Just why did you not de-Rubicon that tear-inviting decision, even after execution? Or was it too late? Okay. And why not apologize to Nigerians, explaining the surrounding circumstances that warranted the inevitable annulment?

Why your "And even now, we make no apologies for the decision…"? IBB, you are a self-assuring fool that covets the impossible mask of a genius!

The youths whom you so eloquently debased and calumniated have resolved to abort, not just your atrocious political goals, but also your relevance in their nation's history, no matter how hard you try to inflate your place. Your uttered insult in the following words, "Young generation can't rule Nigeria because we have seen signs that they are not capable of leading this country and so we feel we should help them. May be they are not given the proper education. That is why" exposes to your political failure as well. "Your failure as son is my fault as a father", the far-sighted Roman Emperor tells Commodus, his son in a well scripted and professionally directed and acted epic movie titled Gladiator. The Nigerian youths would have been thoroughly educated if you had not replaced basic facilities of learning with the Advanced Fee Fraud (419)! There would have been more sages among them if you had not wielded our political power for the astronomical enrichment of yourself and your criminal cabal. Learning more from their deeds than from their speeches, a nation's youths are always a reflection of what their leaders are. These youths too-and this is why the ones in your Fans Clubs now pretend to believing in you-see and like the idea of a 50-room, hilltop palatial mansion. They love to ride on the best fleet of cars and jets, they want to steal (like you and Obasanjo) with pious impunity, they love immunity against pretty justice. The leaders so far, part of which you are, have historically left them with no nobler choices! You who were freely fed, clothed, housed and instructed with Nigerian resources and will had the stinking gut to blockade their survival that you might dance on their mass grave of failure? Does this make sense to your so-called genius? Even despite these, few Nigerian youths manage enough to intellectually develop themselves to see the level of rots your moral aridity, hundreds of baboonish men and women in your unenviable category, had designed as legacies.

I can see you have begun the shameless, crazy course of spending the stolen wealth and the vampirous will on your clearly hated candidacy: you have created groups on facebook, twitter, tagged, and yahoo websites; you are taking the advantages of their diplomatic insincerity and the moral and material poverty of unconscientous countries, columnists, and youths to make the world feel that Nigerians believe in you. You are forging alliances with nephews and cousins of the devil who prefer to sacrifice their future to satisfy their present. The political future that you and other myopic and ungodly few had lubricated with the grease of greed and deceits now rolls for your unprincipled patronage, and you have no internal strength with which to resist the perniciously saturating temptations. You now wish to resume your demented duties of properly plundering and further vandalizing Nigeria!

Even in their graves, MKO Abiola, Kudirat Abiola, Gani Fawehinmi, Fela Anikulapo, Dele Giwa, Pa Alfred Rewane, Ken Saro-Wiwa, etc., detest your return; Okey Ndibe, Omoyele Sowore and Malcolm Fabiyi campaign that you may fail; Bamidele Aturu, Tunde Bakare and Balarebe Musa believe you are a fool; Abubakar Umar, Kennedy Emetulu and Akin Iwilade see you as an object of farce. Have you read "I am not quite sure that Nigerians can stop him from exposing himself to ridicule. He has been lucky that he is not in jail now. His coming out to contest will provide an opportunity for Nigerians to deal with him squarely…" from Femi Falana?

Now listen to me: from Kano to Maiduguri, Zaria to Calabar, Kano to Ile-Ife, Port-Harcourt to Sokoto, Ibadan to Bauchi, Ikire to Jega, Nnewi to Benin, in all nooks and cranies of our tiny largeness, Nigerians abhor the idea of your return as their president. And I would not need to inform you of this if the electoral process is sane enough to relinquish the last say to us electorate. The man whom the foolish and the undisciplined respect, he is not great; the mortal whose life and logic appeal to the simplicity of the common and the complexity of the highly placed, he is our hero. Your name and deeds are ruinous relics of the devil's hold, be told. You are a genius of some special folly incomprehensible to all that is beautiful in our world. Genius makes proud when it is useful; the enigmatism advertises itself, which is committed to the demystification of a nation's befuddling troubles. IBB, you are an unspecial specialty of all negative varieties, a farcical human spirituality, and a one-man battalion buffoon and a bestial bully!

In any promising war of words, conjunctions first betray the ambition of rhetoric. But with the lasting loyalty of verbs and adverbs, adjectives, nouns and pronouns, the joint tears and disapproval of Nigerians against your return to Aso Rock will fly these curses to the abode of absolute fructification in case you refuse to give it up in all that giving it up implies to logical reasoning: IBB, may your life's joy jilt your end with no remorse! May your best qualities cater to the needs of your disgraceful exit! May all columnists, sociologists and historians hit you harder than Samuel Doe, Idi Amin, and Adolf Hitler! May the invisible drums of innocent Nigerians' blood you have needlessly spilled fill your spiritual well at the detriment of the required water of spiritual comfort! May your dishonest mien turn a toxically mesmerizing mess that maims your greatest aims! May your glory nauseate at the arrival of the seat you so shamelessly hope to occupy! May the bone and muscles of millions whom you have mercilessly murdered with your military tactics and political evils pile up into unbreakable pillars that barricade your stolen honour at the most critical moments of your soaring! May your soldierly courage be at the mercy of the most cowardly cowards! May you and your cash-won supporters die in stinking gutters! May all of your spiritual, intellectual and political strategists and accolades (within and outside Nigeria) have their bread of honour maximally buttered by indignity! May any politician-believer in Babangidaism and Obasanjoism (here or in any part of the globe) perish in fatal losses! May your evil ploys against them never diminish the elegant spirits of all Samaformistic anatagonists! May all your exhibited metaphysical immunity and psychological pretence against Nigerians' collective protests, tears and curses sponsor your tragic death! May Aso Rock be eternally disquieted until Nigerians, and not any unpopular, immoral clique, decide through the power of the ballot, those brave and moral leaders that rule Nigeria! And unless justice and universal harmony that enhance survival and dignity of all earthlings are not the essence of Samaformists and prophets, these trailer of curses shall locate and determine your tear-filled existence for as long as you breathe God's air, within the furious flash of our planet's numerous eyes!


---- A Nigerian living in Nigeria, Mankind Olawale Oyewumi is a philosopher, teacher, writer, humanist, activist and Samaformist. The acclaimed writer of SONGS OF THE LAW and IMMORTAL INSTRUCTIONS, LETTER TO IBRAHIM BADAMOSI BABANGIDA was first published in 2010 and was included in the creatively written chapters of A GIFT TO NIGERIA AT FIFTY edited by him. Here is the link to the whole book:
 
This piece was published today in commemoration of the June 12, 1993 Presidential Election won by MKO Abiola.


Nigeriaworld.com

THE FAILURE OF JONATHAN AND THE HOPE BUHARI CAN RESTORE



advertisement
"You cannot compare one hundred Jonathans to one Buhari. I will always give my support to Buhari. He is the finest man I have ever known. Negative things that they say about him are not factual. I will continue to work for Buhari. "Corruption is the bane of Nigeria. Buhari is against corruption. Buhari is not corrupt. He is very clean and disciplined. Election rigging is worse than armed robbery. Buhari wants free, fair and credible elections in Nigeria." -Professor Tamunoemi Sokari David-West
he situation in Nigeria today is worse than it was when Goodluck Jonathan came into the picture, but the only pictures and images we have been seeing since Jonathan came are those of hunger, unemployment, kidnapping, horrific road accidents, ill-equipped hospitals, horrific roads, grand-standing and looting. Looting has been the champion of all of these images combined. It is the pillar of the transformation agenda of today's Aso Rock and the plank upon which Jonathan has built his kingdom. It is the sum total of this that has made an erudite scholar and nationalist Professor Tamunoemi Sokari David-West to insist that a hundred Jonathan cannot be compared to one Buhari. Professor David-West will be 77 come August 26, 2013 and he has seen it all. He served as Petroleum minister with integrity and honour; straightforward in his dealings, and he brought order, stability and transparency to the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), the same national oil corporation whose accounts are today in disarray, in the red, held in secret and held unaccountable to the Nigerian people by Jonathan and his Bayelsa rough-riders who are looting the nation, men and women who think they have the right to loot the nation with the excuse that at least the oil is theirs. These are merely a few people who delude themselves and are using their sickening "transformation agenda," which is clearly pseudonym for looting and corruption, to do as they please and to mismanage the nation and steal her funds. Since corruption is very much alive and well - in fact well positioned in Aso Rock and occupying the throne of state - in the land, there is absolutely no hope for change in the lives of the people.
Professor David-West worked with Buhari and it is not difficult for him to openly declare that Buhari towers above Goodluck more than a hundred times. Anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear will easily spot the difference between a time of national discipline, transparency and openness when order was enforced and compare it to the current season where looters are on the prowl and thieves occupy ministerial positions and hold sway right inside Aso Rock. The last time there was decency and order in Nigeria was during the time of Buhari and Idiagbon. NNPC was well managed, audited annually, and its audit reports made available to the public when Buhari was petroleum minister and also when he was head of government. His petroleum minister between 1984 and 1985 was Professor David-West and Dr. Onaolapo Soleye was his finance minister. Integrity still counted for something then and good names were still regarded and protected. Jonathan and his band of looters are not interested in good names or in service to the people; they are where they are for their own personal gains and for the opportunity to help themselves. Professor David-West will never support such people, notwithstanding the fact that most of the members of the greedy group are from his section of the South-South. Nationalists rise above local and ethnic politics' preferring instead to focus on issues, national interests, and service to the people. It is no surprise that Professor David-West is on the side of good governance, integrity, fairness, transparency, service to the people, and he just could not condescend to the low level of Goodluck Jonathan, who has wasted a rare and unusual opportunity to make a difference, preferring instead the opportunity for filthy lucre and personal gains.
Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Jonathan's Minister of Finance and pseudo-prime minister told the world this week that N58 billion revenue of government that was long overdue for remittance has not been remitted, but rather held in various banks and bank accounts. She considered the funds 'hidden' by unscrupulous bank managers and their 'collaborators' in various federal ministries and departments. She threatened heavy sanctions against the banks and the criminals in the government departments and ministries who are using state funds to earn interests and probably with the hope of stealing the funds out-rightly. But is that the way things should be? Should departments and ministries be threatened or pleaded with to follow established due process? Do these people need reminders to conduct government business responsibly and with integrity? Integrity is lacking at the very top and the rot just roll down the ladder; Aso Rock stinks and looting is alive and well, otherwise the criminal-minded in the various departments and ministries would have been jail-bound as we write. Aso Rock in collaboration with ministers is raking interests from government funds held for long periods of time in banks, and some of the funds just disappear altogether and eventually end up in the bank accounts of fronts and proxies of the ministers and their master-looter. Mercenaries are in control and poverty has badly twisted their heads and they are so small-minded and greedy that they will do anything and steal anything within their reach. The only thing that draws the attention and interest of mercenaries are stuff they can loot and plunder.
Why is it a problem for the Coordinating Minister for the Economy and Minister of Finance to provide a list of the government departments and agencies of government who failed to comply with standard process of government when it is abundantly clear to her that a few are making huge interest income off government's money? It is because that is how this government is and that is the way they do things - making money for themselves at the expense of the people, abusing their positions for their own greedy gains and ends: the name is corruption and looting, and public execution should be the price. If the finance ministry is weak, intimidated and/or unwilling to hold departments, agencies and ministries responsible for the way the nation's funds are managed, then we have a lot of problems. The nation deserve to know and possess the right to have a full list of the 'collaborators' and their ministries. If the Coordinating Minister for the Economy and Minister of Finance can refer to these people as miscreants who are colluding with banks to cheat the nation, she should be able to expose them, and call them by their names. Such men and women should not be occupying any responsible office in any decent society. You cannot afford to put thieves in departments and government agencies, and the Finance minister has a duty to make sure not all ministers and heads of departments are painted with the same brush in the matter of unremitted government revenue that is as huge as N58 billion. I have no doubt this will not happen under Muhammudu Buhari; this can only happen in a very corrupt and criminal environment as we have it now. These people should have been handed over to the police (forget Jonathan's play-station called the EFCC) and prosecuted. It is certain that nothing will happen if the grandfather of corruption and looting is right inside Aso Rock, and no one will ever be charged because these ministers and top political functionaries are acting on instruction from their master, which is why the Ministry of Petroleum stinks and the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) is easily being looted and has no audited accounts.
Some of the major issues relating to the corrupt activities going on in Africa, and in Nigeria in particular, were addressed by former Ghanaian president Jerry John Rawlings recently during a visit to Nigeria. Who else is very qualified to address issues relating to corruption than JJ Rawlings? Rawlings insisted that "we cannot continue to pay lip service" to corruption against the backdrop of the fact that petty thieves are sentenced to long prison terms while whose who embezzle millions and billions of state funds and those who dodge millions in taxes go unpunished. JJ Rawlings spoke directly to Jonathan in this respect. JJ Rawlings was the leader who brought sanity (during his housecleaning exercise) into the corrupt and rotten government in Ghana in the late 1970s and 1980s. Ghana is today the envy of other African nations since JJ Rawlings dealt firmly and decisively with the monster that was corruption in Ghana. And how did he do it? By example, by action and by strangling the monster and ridding the nation of the top thieves, which made the small thieves to quickly realize that no one is above the law. As Rawlings said in Awka, if the big thieves and top looters are held accountable and severely punished the small thieves will quickly put their dirty, filthy hands right back inside their agbada and trousers. Rawlings noted that "corrupt politicians in Nigeria escape punishment. We cannot continue to pay lip service to the strengthening, empowerment and independent management of our multiple anti-corruption institutions," like we do in Nigeria.
It is impossible for someone like Goodluck Jonathan who did not even declare his assets (probably too much and now bloated since the declaration he made when he was vice president) and has people fronting for him and with close ties to contractors and businessmen, to deal with corruption. But Muhammadu Buhari is capable of dealing with the corrupt elements in Nigeria, a major problem confronting the nation today. Buhari will get the support of the Nigerian people to rid the nation of the few who are looting money earmarked for development, healthcare and social services. No clean candidate can emerge from the PDP and this is also true of most of the political parties in Nigeria, but this is the time to support this one candidate Muhammadu Buhari who has the reputation, integrity and ferocious desire to rid our nation of thieves and looters. If we fail to deal with this problem now the nation will deteriorate to a level way beyond what we are seeing today. Nigeria needs a disciplined leader today than ever before - someone who is clean, a decent leader, an untainted and bold father of the nation. We need someone who can straighten things out, lead by example, deploy decent and competent people, and ensure ethical standards of behaviour are introduced and followed. Nigeria needs Muhammudu Buhari today.
Nigeriaworld.com