Nigeria needs more rebels to move forward – Obasanjo By Ernest Nwokolo

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has said that Nigeria requires honest people as rebels to move her forward. Obasanjo said people who live life of honesty and integrity have to also be rebels, explaining that life of honesty and integrity embolden one to speak truth to power, not caring a hoot whose ox is gored. The elder statesman spoke yesterday in Abeokuta, Ogun State capital, at the unveiling of the autobiography of the Babanla Adinni of Egbaland, Chief Tayo Sowunmi, as part of the celebration of his(Sowunmi) 80th birthday. The autobiography titled “Footprints Of A Rebel,” was reviewed by Hafsat Abiola – Costello, daughter of the late politician, MKO Abiola, and founder of Kudirat Initiative for Democracy. According to Obasanjo, having honest people as rebels remained one of the greatest assets for rebuilding a nation. He lauded the octogenarian and former activist for living an exemplary life worthy of emulation by the younger generation. “Looking at the title of the book, I ask myself, why would someone call himself a rebel? But it is good. “But the truth is that if you have to leave a life of honesty and integrity, you have to become a rebel. There would be some time you would be asked to do something, but you would say no, this is not right. And when you say that, you will become a rebel. You may even become a persona non grata. “There is no country that we can call our own except Nigeria. Our country, Nigeria, needs more rebels. Those who would look at things straight in the face and say ‘this is not good for Nigeria,” Obasanjo said. Speaking earlier, Pastor Tunde Bakare of Citadel Global Community Church, seeks inter-generational reintegration between older and younger ones as part of efforts to regenerate the country.

The blame game over toxic petrol import continues By MUYIWA LUCAS

The controversy rages on over the importation of toxic petrol. In what has suddenly turned into blame game, a revelation of past atrocities committed by the supplier, Litasco, exposes the level of due diligence that the sole importer of petrol conducts on its suppliers and vendors. As authorities and stakeholders are trying to get to the root of this crisis, it has been a blame trading episode across board. But what really are the issues? MUYIWA LUCAS asks. ONE week after, the country has continued to groan from the effects of the “Off Spec” premium motor spirit (PMS) or petrol that found its way into the market. However, the controversy has continued to trail the entire saga, with accusations and counter accusations enveloping the air. The more the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC) Limited tries to exonerate itself from the scandal, the more it keeps sinking deeper. For instance, it took an advertorial in national newspapers by MRS, a major oil marketer, before the NNPC could offer any tangible explanation, and in the process, exposing other culprits involved. For instance, the “Off Spec” fuel was shipped into the country from Antwerp, Belgium, by Litasco, a Geneva, Switzerland-based oil firm. A quick check on Litasco’s website paints an impressive image of this Geneva-based firm with over 450 workforce. Litasco, a firm founded in 2000 in Switzerland, is the exclusive international marketing and trading company of Lukoil Oil Company, a Russian firm. Litasco describes itself as one of the world’s major traders of crude oil and refined petroleum products. However, beyond these glorifying eulogies of this Swiss commodities trader, a deeper check unearths the “dirty” side of the firm. The company may not be new to sending substandard petroleum products to West Africa, if a report of the Dutch entitled: “Human Environment and Transport Inspectorate” (ILT) is anything to go by. This is because a 2016 report indicted Litasco as one of the European companies that “deliberately and systematically” use toxic blend stocks in mixing fuels. ILT, according to a report dated July 10, 2018, presented a report to parliament about the composition and hazardousness of fuels exported to West Africa from Amsterdam and Rotterdam. The investigation highlighted the decisive role played by commodities trading firms that maximise profits by taking advantage of lax West African fuel standards. In contrast to Holland, neither the Swiss firms named in the report – Vitol, Gunvor and Litasco –  nor the Swiss authorities recognise their responsibility for this scandal that harms the health of millions of people. Stakeholders said if this report is anything to go by, then it raised further questions on the extent of due diligence done by business owners or even the NNPC in their choice of partners for engagements. The report, entitled: Dirty Diesel: Dutch Environment Inspectors Confirm Dodgy Business of Swiss Commodities Traders, was published on July 10, 2018. In September 2016, Public Eye’s Dirty Diesel investigation uncovered the business model of sending low-quality and harmful fuels to Africa. The Dutch government was forced to promise the legislature a report in which the environment inspectors confirmed the role played by Swiss commodities trading firms: Vitol, Gunvor, Litasco as well as other companies, deliberately and systematically use toxic “blend stocks” in the mixing of fuels. Starting in 2017, ILT researched the loading of 44 tankers destined for West Africa. It found diesel with 300 times more sulfur and twice as many cancer-causing hydrocarbons as are allowed in Europe. Gasoline contained elements high in sulfur as well as cancer-causing substances like manganese, in concentrations up to 30 times over the European limit. The report concluded that the concerned companies either ignored or were unaware of the European regulation for chemical substances (REACH) and the Dutch law. The environment inspector also investigated fuel oil for sea-going vessels and found products from two commodities trading firms that are categorised as illegal waste. These results show that West African countries like Nigeria, where the implementation of stricter gasoline standards has been blocked for months, must urgently enact the standards, to protect their people from such toxic cocktails. The United Nations Environment Director Erik Solheim, in his response to the report, called out the corporations profiting from this political indecisiveness: “Substandard products should not be sold even if they meet national standards,” he said. With this investigation, the Netherlands has taken responsibility as a location for the production and export of hazardous fuels. A further investigation is in progress to determine if “Dirty Diesel” companies are violating the OECD guidelines for multinational corporations. Meanwhile, in Switzerland, where the concerned corporations have their headquarters, there has so far been no political response to the scandal, not to mention an investigation. This inaction by the authorities on a flagrant violation of the right to health of people in Africa is another example why the Swiss Responsible Business Initiative is necessary. The spirited efforts of the NNPC to absolve itself of complacency in the importation saga also seems not to be holding waters given that some firms fingered by the company in the deal have come out with proof to absolve themselves of any involvement in the importation of the 50, 000 metric tons or 100 million litres of petrol. NNPC, for some years, has being the sole importer of PMS. This, the company, does by awarding contracts to its vendors for the shipment of the commodity. The vendors in turn, depending on their partnership with several oil merchants, subcontracts them for shipment of the commodity into the country.But for those with a discerning and critical mind, the question is: at what point was there a slip in the supply chain for this product to get into the market? This is because a look at the importation process of fuel shows that for every country, there are specifications for their PMS requirements. Usually, before a fuel laden vessel leaves its port of embarkation, tests are carried out on the contents to be sure it meets the correct specification. Further tests are carried out on the high sea on the content and upon the arrival of the consignment in Atlas Cove jetty- which is off the coast of Lagos, the Nigerian Midstream Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) moves in to the vessel to test the conformity of the product with the Nigerian standard before it is released into the market. The highest methanol level for Nigeria is just about two per cent. The controversial fuel has a 20 per cent methanol level. Once the product meets the required standard, it is then sent to the depots for onward discharge to marketers through the various means of transportation available, including through the pipelines. But the question on stakeholders’ mind is: At what point could the product have been contaminated? For some, what happened might not have been contamination of the product in the real sense of it. This is because the vendor contracted to import the fuel already knows the standard requirement of the country. Therefore, bringing in something contrary from means it is an “off Spec”. Yet, others believe that there could have been a compromise in the supply chain. Reason: Inspectors from the NMDPRA are expected to check the quality of the fuel upon landing at Atlas Cove before it is released into the various markets. Insiders in the oil sector posit the following as specifications for standard petrol for the market: The erstwhile DPR (now NMDPRA) and SON specifications state that petrol must be clear and bright; whereas the appearance of the controversial petrol was clearly hazy; SON/NMDPRA specifications states clearly that petrol range must be between 0.7200and 0.7800g/ml; whereas the imported product has a density of 0.7865g/ml; SON/NMDPRA specification for petrol’s Full Boiling point (FBP) is 210 degC; whereas that of the controversial fuel 211 degC; The imported petrol’s solvent washed Gum content is 6.5mg/100ml; whereas SON specifies parameters of 4.0mg/100ml; The controversial petrol oxidation stability is 329 minutes, compared to the SON/NMDPRA specification of minimum 360 minutes levels. Another question is: Why did the NNPC appoint few petroleum products marketing companies (some of them portfolio companies) to import petrol leaving out other more competent marketing firms? Also, why did the NNPC cancel the PMS import intervention scheme that involved the NNPC, CBN, prequalified petroleum marketers and independent auditors, which a former NNPC GMD put in place? This process was adjudged to have been very transparent. Going by the sample of the fuel as seen in a viral video, it is evident that the fuel could not have met the parameters for the market. A reliable source in the Standards Organisation of Nigeria (SON) said since the organisation has been chased out of the ports, all sorts of substandard products enter into the country. And until an investigation is done, there will remain more questions than answers. Providing a graphic chronicle of the unfortunate incident, the NNPC CEO, Mallam Mele Kyari, said on January 20, 2022, that the company received a report from its quality inspector on the presence of emulsion particles in PMS cargoes shipped to Nigeria from Antwerp-Belgium. He explained that NNPC investigation revealed the presence of methanol in four PMS cargoes imported by the following Direct-Sale-Direct-Purchase (DSDP) suppliers as listed in the table below. He noted that cargoes quality certificates issued at loadport (Antwerp-Belgium) by AmSpec Belgium indicated that the gasoline complied with Nigerian Specification. “The NNPC quality inspectors, including GMO, SGS, GeoChem and G&G conducted tests before discharge also showed that the gasoline met Nigerian specification,’’ he said. Kyari noted that as a standard practice for PMS import to Nigeria, the said cargoes were certified by inspectors appointed by the NMDRA. “It is important to note that the usual quality inspection protocol employed in the load port in Belgium and our discharge ports in Nigeria do not include the test for per cent methanol content and, therefore, the additive was not detected by our quality inspectors,’’ he stated. However, to prevent the distribution of the petrol, the NNPC CEO said the company promptly ordered the quarantine of un-evacuated volumes and the holding back of the affected products in transit (truck & marine).

Toxic fuel: More questions than answers By Muyiwa Lucas

By last Thursday, the silence that enveloped the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC) Limited, over the importation of “Off Spec” petrol into the country, had given way. The spirited effort of the NNPC to absolve itself of complicity in the importation saga also seemed not to be holding water given that some of the firms fingered by the company have come out to absolve themselves of any involvement in the importation of the 50,000 metric tons or 100 million liters of petrol. NNPC, for some years now, has been the sole importer of PMS into the country. This the company does by awarding contracts to its vendors for shipment of the commodity. The vendors in turn depending on their partnership with several oil merchants, contract them for shipment of the commodity into the country. But for those with a discerning and critical mind the question is at what point was there a slip in the supply chain for this product to get into the Nigerian market? This is because a look at the importation process of fuel shows that for every country, there are specifications for their PMS requirements. Usually, before a fuel-laden vessel leaves its port of embarkation, tests are carried out on the contents to be sure it meets the correct specification. Further tests are carried out on the high sea on the content and upon the arrival of the consignment in Atlas Cove jetty- which is off the coast of Lagos, the Nigerian Midstream Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA), moves in to the vessel to test the conformity of the product with the Nigerian standard before it is released into the market. The highest methanol level for Nigeria is just about two percent. The controversial fuel has a 20 percent methanol level. Once the product meets the required standard, it is then sent to the depots for onward discharge to marketers through the various means of transportation available, including through the pipelines. But the question on stakeholders mind is at what point could the product have been contaminated? For some, what happened may not be contamination of the product in the real sense. This is because the vendor contracted to import the fuel already knows the standard requirement of the country. Therefore, bringing in something contrary from the requirement means it is “Off Spec”. Yet, others believe that there could have been compromise in the supply chain. Reason? Inspectors from the NMDPRA are expected to check the quality of the fuel upon landing in Atlas Cove before it is released into the various market. Insiders in the oil sector list the following as specifications for standard petrol for the Nigerian market: The erstwhile DPR now NMDPRA and Standard Organisation of Nigeria (SON) specifications state that petrol must be clear and bright; whereas the appearance of the controversial petrol was clearly hazy. SON/NMDPRA specifications state that petrol range must be between 0.7200-0.7800g/ml; whereas the imported product has a density of 0.7865g/ml. SON/NMDPRA specifications for petrol’s Full Boiling Point (FBP) is210 degC; whereas that of the controversial fuel is 211 degC. The imported petrol’s solvent washed gum content is 6.5mg/100ml; whereas SON specifies parameters of 4.0mg/100ml. The controversial petrol oxidation stability is 329 minutes, compared to the SON/NMDPRA specification of minimum 360 minutes levels. Another food for thought is why NNPC had to appoint few petroleum products marketing companies (some of them portfolio companies) to import petrol leaving out other more competent marketing firms? Also, why did NNPC cancel the PMS import intervention scheme process that involved NNPC, CBN, prequalified petroleum marketers and independent auditors, which former NNPC GMD, Dr. KachikwuIbe, put in place? This process was adjudged to have been very transparent. Going by the sample of the fuel as seen in a viral video, it is evident that the fuel could not have met all the parameters for the Nigerian market. A reliable source in SON said since the organisation has been chased out of the ports, all sorts of substandard products now enter into the country. Until an open investigation is done, there will remain more questions than answers.

Russian warship chases off US submarine near Pacific islands -Moscow Agency Report

A Russian anti-submarine destroyer chased off a US submarine near the Kuril Islands, forcing it to leave the country’s territorial waters, Moscow said on Saturday, amid rising tensions over Ukraine. The US military however denied the account. Russia’s defence ministry said that during planned military drills the Marshal Shaposhnikov destroyer had detected a US Navy Virginia-class submarine in Russian territorial waters near the Kuril Islands in the northern Pacific. When the submarine ignored demands to surface, the crew of the frigate “used appropriate means” and the US submarine left at full speed, the ministry said, without providing further details. The ministry said it had summoned the US defence attache in Moscow over the incident. “In connection with the violation by the US Navy submarine of the state border of the Russian Federation, the defence attache at the US embassy in Moscow was summoned to the Russian defence ministry”, the defence ministry said. The statement from the US military, however, said: “There is no truth to the Russian claims of our operations in their territorial waters.” Captain Kyle Raines, spokesman for the US Indo-Pacific Command, said he would not comment on the precise locations of US submarines. Read Also But he added: “We do fly, sail, and operate safely in international waters.” The Kurils, which lie north of Japan’s Hokkaido island, have been controlled by Moscow since they were seized by Soviet troops in the waning days of World War II. The alleged incident took place near the Kuril island of Urup, which is controlled by Russia. It comes amid rising tensions between Russia and the West that have seen Moscow surround Ukraine on three sides with more than 100,000 troops. Washington has warned that an all-out invasion could begin “any day”. Russian leader Vladimir Putin on Saturday condemned such claims as a “provocation”. AFP

PVC does not expire, says INEC By Steve Oko

INEC, 2023 presidential election …Takes voter registration campaign to Gregory varsity The Independent National Electoral Commission INEC, has explained that contrary to misconceptions in some quarters, the Permanent Voter’s Card, PVC, does not expire. Resident Electoral Commissioner, REC, in charge of Abia State, Dr. Joseph Iloh, who made the clarification while sensitising students at the 10th Matriculation ceremony of the Gregory University Uturu, said “PVC is as valid as the voter is alive”. He urged students of the university who were eligible for voting to arm themselves with PVC ahead of the 2023 general polls. INEC also advocated active participation of the university community in the electoral process since the electoral umpire usually recruits its ad-hoc staff from the university environment. Earlier in his address, the Vice Chancellor, Professor Augustine Uwakwe, tasked the 484 matriculants to focus on academic excellence and shun all forms of distractions associated with campus life. The VC who said the university had zero tolerance for cultism, drug abuse and internet fraud, charged the students to eschew all forms of vices as anyone caught indulging in such abnormality will be decisively dealt with. READ ALSO: INEC Appointment: CSO replies Prof Gumus’ legal team, we’re ready to meet in court The VC who said the university was poised to break global records in many fields urged the students to take advantage of the entrepreneurial Centre in the Institution to acquire vocational skills for self reliance in addition to their certificate. He said that the Institution had world-class facilities including library and laboratories with modern facilities comparable with those in any standard university in the world. In a remark, Gov. Okezie Ikpeazu, described Gregory university as the fasted-growing university in the South East region, saying he is proud that the founder is an Abian who had shown capacity in many fields. Ikpeazu who was represented by his Chief of Staff, Professor Anthony Agbazuere, urged the students to select their goal in life and pursue same with undivided single mindedness. The governor who commended the university management for its special attention to entrepreneurial studies urged the staff to complement the efforts of the Chancellor by putting in their best despite the challenges of working in the private sector. VANGUARD NEWS NIGERIA

Nigeria desires pragmatic legislative oversight By Tonnie Iredia

Whereas Nigerians are agreed that their nation is in dire need of several projects to arrive at some considerable level of development, there are by far too many views and counter views as well as actions blocking the way forward. For now, almost every topic has an opposite perspective that can confuse leadership. This includes even serious security issues bordering on terrorism and banditry. A few days ago, former Imo Governor, Rochas Okorocha argued that although he has never supported the activities of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) he did not agree with the appellation of terrorists given to them. Instead, he says “I see them as children who have not been properly educated on the happenings” they are reacting to. On his part, Islamic scholar, Ahmad Gumi had insisted that banditry was essentially a business because the “big weapons bandits were using could not have crossed the borders into the country if money was not exchanging hands.” Unfortunately, arguments such as these which appeal to the emotions and sentiments of some people cannot help the nation. A more substantive issue different from the allegation of money changing hands, is the other point made by Gumi that our military troops were colluding with the bandits. Perhaps because the military refuted the claim little was done about it. In other climes, the media would have on the basis of their mandate of holding those in authority accountable to the people followed up the subject. But in Nigeria, that is almost impossible because our media professionals are greatly hindered by several handicaps among them official policies, ownership control and poor media financing. How can the media hold government accountable in Nigeria when her leaders are enacting laws which in all respects have the same provisions as those of the obsolete law of sedition which imperialist agents used against activists during the colonial era? These days, every media report that is not exactly favourable to government is classified as hate speech capable of destabilizing the country or state as the case may be. Before the reporter can defend himself especially in states such as Ebonyi, he has already been traumatized by law enforcement agencies who are relying on some local laws on fake news. Thus, with government leaders using their offices to stop the media from holding those in authority accountable to the people, what other options are available to the nation? Why for example couldn’t the relevant committees of the legislature take up the allegations raised by Gumi and indeed any other allegation? We are encouraged to raise this poser following the report a few days back that the House of Representatives had resolved to investigate the on-going recruitment exercises into the Nigeria Social Insurance Trust Fund (NSITF) and other agencies under the Ministry of Labour and Productivity. The House allegedly found that only people from a particular part of the country were being recruited in breach of the federal character principle. The resolution of the House includes an appropriate sanction for anyone found culpable of undue favouritism in the exercise. The probe is to last four weeks. Any well-meaning Nigerian ought to commend the decision of the House of Representatives. However, how come it is only the Ministry of Labour and its agencies that are so selected for investigation? Is anyone suggesting that the House is unaware that the allegation which is the sing-song in today’s public service affects virtually all Ministries, Parastatals and Agencies (MDA)? When will the exercise be extended to such other bodies? Our point must not be misunderstood; we depart entirely from critics who oppose the checking of wrong doing at one location simply because all other culprits are spared the agony. We call on all committees to investigate MDAs in their spheres of oversight with respect to the same exercise which is to hold at the Ministry of labour shortly. We recommend that the terms of reference of the committees should include the identification of powerful citizens in government behind the trend of favouritism in personnel recruitment in Nigeria. I will be shocked if many legislators will not be indicted. It is our hope that the investigations would not take the pattern of previous exercises that were fitful and whose results were never made public. It will be recalled that in November last year, the Senate had raised an alarm that some officials of the federal civil service had engaged in secret recruitment while wrongly claiming that there was an official embargo on employment. Having discovered that some Nigerians who graduated some 15 years ago were yet to be employed we had thought the Senate would follow the subject through and reduce the tension of unemployment in the land. Painfully, we are yet to see any positive development. We hope the alarm raised by the Senate was not just a ploy to get spaces for their relations in some agencies and that this investigation into the Ministry of Labour and its agencies would be more transparently handled in the public interest. Indeed, the issue of adhering to the federal character principle should not be toyed with because it is high among the items creating disaffection in the land. It would do more harm if our top office holders continue to pay lip service to it. When the police announced recently that many applications were not received from some states in the South, many people expressed surprise. With the revelation two days ago by Governor Douye Diri of Bayelsa state that the police recruitment template was skewed, those in charge must return to the drawing table. As argued by Diri, “equitable recruitment into federal agencies can only be achieved if the process was in tandem with the federal character principle as enshrined in the Nigerian Constitution.” It is in truth a different ball game if the template used was based on number of local government areas in a state which is unjustifiable and lacks merit. The point Governor Diri is making is that there is a need for consistency in our understanding of the federal character principle. We cannot, as many politicians are doing now, pick and choose when to or not to adhere to it. Some presidential aspirants and other leaders have of recent made a strong case for merit which on its own has many advantages. But we cannot be seen to be describing rotational presidency as obsolete and unmeritorious while still hanging-on to our quota system and federal character principle which offer selective gains. If Nigeria has developed enough to have its president come from anywhere, our entire structure should be devoid of those lower and unimaginative prescriptive criteria. In fact, we cannot continue to operate a federal character principle when the body set up to ensure its observance is itself in breach. Among all agencies, the federal character commission cannot but have a federal character. Last year, two allegations were made against the commission. The first was that its tradition which from inception has been to ensure a chairman and a secretary are periodically sourced from North and South was breached as both offices are now held by appointees from same region. The second was that 20 out of the 37 commissioners had drawn attention in vain to the fact that the chairman had been engaged in secret recruitments in which 50% of those employed were sourced from her kinsmen. Nothing appears to have been done to these allegations. If, however, anything was done, it probably did not attract same publicity as the breach of the federal principle making it difficult for many people to know about it. But if nothing has been done since then, efforts must now be made to handle it simultaneously with that of NSITF so as to send the correct message that we are set to rebuild our nation without fear or favour. We must put our legislature into better use, rather than engaging them in bogus impeachment exercises such as the wind blowing currently in Zamfara state. Vanguard News