As The Church Slept… (7)   This call was proved fruitful in Kano and Bauchi States in the heavily and violently rigged 2007 general elections. This is the reason the P.D.P. was jittery in the build up to the 2011 elections concerning this call and attempted to do all they could to stop the protection of votes, because they cannot win any free and fair elections even if they stoke religious sentiments like they always do, and therefore the P.D.P. and their supporters criticizing Buhari’s call for votes protection would rather we escort PDP thugs with cheers, claps, flowers, love songs and poems when they come snatching ballot boxes or when they are rewriting election results usually with active connivance of security forces who probably see themselves as the armed security wing of the PDP and making it worse is an unpredictable judiciary that could “arrest” certain judgments that seem not to favour the party. They had an elaborate scheme to secure 25 per cent of the presidential election votes in states they considered to be General Buhari’s strongholds. In their flawed analysis or thinking they thought outright rigging was going to bring violence because of the evident determination of the people not to have a repeat of the 2007 farce called elections, more so they know very well that the teeming masses respect and listen to General Buhari more than them, hence the resort to padding the votes to generate the much sought 25 per cent. But they failed to consider one thing, that is, if General Buhari was so unpopular in any of the south-south or south-east states such that he could win only about 5, 000 votes in one state how popular was Goodluck Jonathan in Buhari’s strongholds for him to win hundreds of thousands of votes in, say Kano for example or Sokoto, more so considering the seething anger and frustration over Goodluck Jonathan’s usurpation of the rightful turn of the north to contest the election in his party. In this context, was it logical that the mass of northern voters would love Goodluck Jonathan more than his southern voters or supporters would love General Buhari? Or is it a case of the new definition of national unity now gaining ground, that at a political party convention southern delegates are entitled to give their bloc vote to a southern presidential aspirant contesting against a northern aspirant with northern delegates expected to do same and those northern delegates or states that did not toe that pattern labeled as not believing in national unity? The same attitude was expected and exhibited in the general presidential election. All of a sudden it is conveniently being forgotten that the north overwhelmingly dumped their own, Alhaji Othman Bashir Tofa for Chief M.K.O. Abiola in the 1993 elections and massively repeated the same for General Obasanjo in 1999. Some commentators are now labeling the north that voted Buhari as anti unity or as sectionalists. Are historical voting records, which will showcase who the real sectionalists and tribalists are, missing even before rapture? Therefore without doubt, the responsibility of the post-election violence should be and must be placed on the shoulders of the P.D.P. They raised a very large army of unemployed, frustrated and angry youth through their corrupt practices and then capped it by dishonestly resolving their zoning brouhaha and then wanted 25 per cent from the region cheated why wouldn’t there be such backlash. So, you see clearly that General Buhari became a victim of the backfiring of the PDP’s long term mischief. The national youth corps members that were killed were also victims of this mischief. In the elections preceding the presidential vote there were media reports of youth corps members working as ad-hoc staff caught aiding and abetting vote rigging in favour of the PDP in most northern states, then came the presidential vote and its complications. Complications because southern and Church going national youth service corps members working as INEC ad-hoc staff got caught in the web of corrupt and thieving P.D.P. governors who were determined to secure 25 per cent of the votes for a desperate southern presidential candidate of the thieving party, and these ad-hoc staff probably heard in Church to “vote according to faith”, and so, what coincidence! They became victims of this notorious coincidence. I have heard people say why did the riots break out in places the General won, and why did the riots start even before the final result tally was made. It all boils down to this 25 per cent stuff. Reports were of course filtering in that General Buhari was winning mere 5, 000 votes in southern states, the vote tally expressing how much they love him as a Muslim Hausa/Fulani northerner and then here was Goodluck Jonathan whom they had every reason to be angry with polling hundreds of thousands in their own domain. It just doesn’t add up. Whatever factor they thought made Goodluck Jonathan very popular in the south and correspondingly made General Buhari unpopular there could also be the same factor that made General Buhari popular in the north and correspondingly made Goodluck Jonathan unpopular there, except of course, I know that, that factor cannot be anti-corruption or patriotism, for on these the General stood and still stands in good stead. In the case of Goodluck Jonathan, logically speaking, he stood and still stands more unpopular in the north for cheating them of their rightful turn at the presidency. I have read suggestions from hitherto reasonable analysts and columnists suggesting that General Buhari couldn’t have expected to win the elections because he had no structures in the south. For example, Eddy Odivwri who writes for This Day newspaper, in his column (polscope) on page 56 of their edition of Saturday, April 30, 2011 titled, Buhari: If the Truth Be Told said, “Buhari is popular in the north, not in the south. Yet, he made no effort to specially court the south. He took the south for granted…” Somewhere in the same article he contradicted this claim by saying, “The widespread acceptance of Buhari’s nascent Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) should have even gladdened him, rather than give him a false status of a political conquistador. Here was a political party that is less than 20 months old. And within such a short time had had such flaming spread across the country, with a good following. ” Did you notice the sudden transition? From “not popular in the south” to “flaming spread across the country, with a good following” and “widespread acceptance.” This gave me more evidence that sentiments rather than capability was whipped up by the PDP in collaboration with some Christian clergy to defeat the General. On the Hausa service of the Voice of America broadcast at 6am on Wednesday, May 11, 2011, Hon. Usman Bugaje, the erstwhile National Secretary of the A.C.N. was asked why his party seemed to have delivered for the PDP in their strong hold, the south-west. He answered that President Goodluck Jonathan came and held several meetings with several groups in Lagos, and he consistently impressed on them that he was the only Christian and ethnic minority in the contest among the major contenders. This can be true; for the president had no selling point other than sentiments, including the false claim to niceness, meekness and humility as if these were not the uniform the devil wore to be able to deceive Eve in the Garden of Eden. Such a president! This is the “structures” his supporters and handlers are trumpeting he has nationwide and of which General Buhari doesn’t have. Eddy Odivwri again: “What is more, the rave of revolution supposedly sparked by Buhari derives strongly from his military portraiture as a no-nonsense man. He is generally believed to be a firm, honest, and disciplined man. Yes! But anyone who will lead such a complex country like Nigeria, will require far more than these threesome virtues. Under a democracy, most of the tough image associated with Buhari would have been weakened or diluted.” Can you imagine that? Mr. Eddy Odivwri conceded that the General is generally considered to be a man of integrity, but that the sum of the virtues that make integrity are not enough, that he should have weakened or diluted his character because of democracy, meaning he should have been a little bit of a thief, a little bit of a liar, a little bit of a womanizer, a little bit of a drunk, a little bit of a disco freak, a little bit of D’Banj interviews, a little bit of a homosexual, a little bit of a ritualist, a little bit an occult and a little bit corrupt to gain acceptance. Was this what the clergy wanted? Was this the requirement to win in the south? Was this the much vaunted structures Buhari was and is being lampooned of not having nationwide? |
Monday, 5 December 2011
As The Church Slept… (6)
The Nation newspaper, on page 19 of their Wednesday, May 18, 2011 second editorial captioned A cleric’s inconsistency, lamented the curious relationship between some Christian clergy (The Right Rev. Olusina Fape) and the P.D.P. thus: “We would have been at ease to place where the cleric truly belongs, except that he is inconsistent. And that is a big problem with many of our clerics; they seem to be talking from both sides of their mouths. Clerics ought not to be praise- singers but, as representatives of God on earth, they should tell the truth whatever the situation, and damn the consequence. They need not be fair-weather friends.” Hmmmm…, I shiver and I shudder. The clergy are being watched, and the purpose of their calling is being reminded them by a newspaper! If the P.D.P., the institution of plunder, roguery and savagery is the ID of the Church then one can only exclaim, “Lord have mercy!” Sure, the huge marketing trick worked as lots of people, mostly Christians, said after the elections, “I voted for Goodluck Jonathan and not the party, the PDP”, and you just sigh in wonderment, thinking how possible it was to distinguish between the party and her candidate. It was as if the candidate just emerged from the moon without testimony of involvement in the series of the party’s malfeasance of which he was deeply involved as deputy governor, governor, vice president, acting president and then as President. It was and is still the dumbest statement I have ever heard. These gods of Janus certainly can market almost anything unmarketable under the sun. Dr. Okey Ndibe, a Columnist with the Daily Sun newspaper, marveled at this development in his article, For Jonathan, Obasanjo as parable, on page 55 of the edition of Tuesday, May 3, 2011.
He wrote: “One of the bizarre developments in the presidential election was the refrain by many voters that they chose Mr. Jonathan despite their grave misgivings about his People’s Democratic Party (PDP). That sentiment is curious precisely because Mr. Jonathan’s political career, in style and substance, stipulates that here’s a man who, by conviction and temperament, is wedded to the PDP.” This is true; you cannot separate Mr. Jonathan from the PDP. I have heard people say he struck them as a nice guy, someone different from the style of the party, but they should have known, had it been they cared to mine the archive of information, that he couldn’t have risen through to the top without him being an active participant in the party’s putrid way of doing things. It shocked me, because it sounded like someone just collected the mark of the beast, and when asked why he collected it justified it by saying he received it because the guy stamping the mark looked clean, decent and handsome. I blame this on the poor reading culture of Nigerians, particularly Christians. They seem content in just reading the Bible and inspirational books written by anointed men of God while hugely ignoring newspapers and news magazines, which will inform them of the character of the people governing them and the things happening in the society. In fact, such information will help the believer know the positive effect or otherwise of their prayer for the nation and will help in no small way in shaping their decision during election seasons. God’s lamentation in Hosea 4:6 that “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge” should not be mistaken to mean only Biblical knowledge; it includes the knowledge of and happenings in and around your environment. Investment in knowledge and information is not, and will never ever be a waste.The biased involvement of the Church in these elections has left the nation disunited like never before. And the Church leadership, apparently having not realized that under them the Church has wavered from her salt of the nation calling with the attendant unpleasant consequence of the Church being trodden under foot of men have attempted to worsen an already worst case by calling for the arrest of the CPC presidential candidate, Gen. Buhari over the riots in parts of the north that greeted the presidential elections. They failed to realize that their publicized endorsement of Goodluck Jonathan to win the election, instead of demanding him to go and honour his party’s power sharing agreement engendered the riots, with Churches burnt and Christians killed. Why? Because the Church was seen to be an accomplice in perpetrating injustice, the denial of the north’s rightful turn at the presidency, coming at the heels of the death of a northerner who barely spent a little over two years in that office in a potential eight year turn. In fact, immediately after the presidential election and after Goodluck Jonathan was declared “winner”, his handlers resorted to blackmailing the nation by serially publishing in various news media the photograph of Goodluck Jonathan kneeling down and being prayed for by Pastor E.A. Adeboye, typically expressing their usual mantra, “God gives power to whomsoever He wishes.” The Church became afflicted with Compassion Deficiency Disease (CDD) just like most of the politicians in Nigeria, apologies to Chi-Chi Okonjo (back page of This day newspaper, Thursday, April 21, 2011.) It was Pope Paul VI (1897 – 1978) who said, “If you want peace, work for justice.” Yes, justice breeds peace. I have read some puerile arguments like, why did the north not break out in riots after the heavily rigged 2007 presidential election. The answer is, based on the power sharing deal a northerner “won” the heavily flawed poll. It didn’t matter whether it was Buhari or Yar’Adua that won, the issue at stake then was, yes, the deal was “respected”, a northerner was “elected”. There was a sense of justice among them, no matter whether the justice was a flawed one considering the blatantly rigged election.
That is why CAN has lost the moral right to call for the arrest of Gen. Buhari, for they have taken sides with the PDP and therefore have become, wittingly or not, the spokespersons of the party. Calling for his arrest suggests the PDP, on whose behalf CAN was making the call for, has conducted an investigation and found the General and his party culpable, and therefore also suggests there was no need again for President Jonathan to commission the Panel of Inquiry he inaugurated to investigate the usual “immediate and remote” causes of the violence.
True, there were pictures of the rampaging youth displaying posters of the General, but it should be seen in the context of him being seen by the pitiable and frustrated youth in the north as the symbol, or more appropriately the agent that will bring positive change to their lives. Those youth were and are obviously tired of the uninspiring and condemned life the corrupt elite in Nigeria have subjected them to over the years, and they have an inner knowing that their lives could be better if compassionate and purposeful leadership had been in place. This should be understood in the context that God created each person with a sense of self dignity and honour, and so there will always be that drive to break out of any wall or barrier that tends to stifle the projection of one’s dignity and honour, which is what corrupt leaders have always been – barriers and walls against the common good. History has revealed that all successful revolutions, including the new ones sweeping through the Middle East now, have always been fought on the quest against such barriers that stood against the promotion of human dignity and honour.
The poor man in Nigeria knows very well that part of the reasons for his poverty is corruption, which has become the way of life of the ruling elite. So, in spite of the observed subservience and obeisance which the poor treat the wealthy there’s always a suppressed tinge of envy and anger and frustration patiently waiting for a catalyst to burst forth. They always look out for an inspiration – something that will crystallize them into liberating themselves – a leader they can identify with and can trust. This is the context in which General Buhari is seen by the poor and the well informed, decent, honourable and truthful middle class and the few honest and truth loving wealthy people. They see him remarkably different from the other elite all around them who, even after a short spell in the corridors of power, have amassed sudden and questionable wealth, knowing that the General has been a military governor, a G.O.C., a petroleum minister, a military head of state and chaired the P.T.F. with his integrity intact. When rounding up his presidential campaign on 13th April 2011 he said this: “I have had the fortune and privilege of managing national resources in various capacities – as a military commander, as a state governor, as a minister, as head of the Petroleum Trust Fund, and as the head of state of this great country. And in all that I have been and done, I have never touched a kobo of public funds.
“I say this without pride and with all sense of responsibility and humility; but I challenge anyone in the race for the leadership of this country then or now to dare make the same claim.” It was a challenge that went unanswered. And that challenge is still echoing in Nigeria’s air space and landscape, and will continue to echo until Nigerians opt to free themselves from the vice grip of vagabonds in power. It is this desire to break out from penury imposed by corruption that caused the teeming mass in the north to heed General Buhari’s popular call, “a katsa, a tsare, a raka, a fada”, meaning, vote, protect your vote, escort your vote until it is announced. This is sound voter education. If you are a decent politician like Buhari and you are politicking in a notoriously corrupt country like Nigeria, where the ruling or ruining party has violated and polluted every means of lawful advancement of justice, including the security forces and the judiciary, and because of your avowed commitment to stick to your integrity you have no option than to be revolutionary by calling on oppressed voters to protect their votes and make sure they count. Is this not the same type of call that liberated most nations from oppressive colonialists? If the Jews had not heeded Moses’ revolutionary call to defy Pharaoh’s oppression and leave they would have remained in bondage. This call was proved fruitful in Kano and Bauchi States in the heavily and violently rigged 2007 general elections. This is the reason the P.D.P. was jittery in the build up to the 2011 elections concerning this call and attempted to do all they could to stop the protection of votes, because they cannot win any free and fair elections even if they stoke religious sentiments like they always do, and therefore the P.D.P. and their supporters criticizing Buhari’s call for votes protection would rather we escort P.D.P. thugs with cheers, claps, flowers, love songs and poems when they come snatching ballot boxes or when they are rewriting election results usually with active connivance of security forces who probably see themselves as the armed security wing of the P.D.P., and making it worse is an unpredictable judiciary that could “arrest” certain judgments that seem not to favour the party. They had an elaborate scheme to secure 25% of the presidential election votes in states they considered to be General Buhari’s strongholds. In their flawed analysis or thinking they thought outright rigging was going to bring violence because of the evident determination of the people not to have a repeat of the 2007 farce called elections, more so they know very well that the teeming masses respect and listen to General Buhari more than them, hence the resort to padding the votes to generate the much sought 25%. But they failed to consider one thing, that is, if General Buhari was so unpopular in any of the south-south or south-east states such that he could win only about 5, 000 votes in one state how popular was Goodluck Jonathan in Buhari’s strongholds for him to win hundreds of thousands of votes in, say Kano for example or Sokoto, more so considering the seething anger and frustration over Goodluck Jonathan’s usurpation of the rightful turn of the north to contest the election in his party. In this context, was it logical that the mass of northern voters would love Goodluck Jonathan more than his southern voters or supporters would love General Buhari? Or is it a case of the new definition of national unity now gaining ground, that at a political party convention southern delegates are entitled to give their bloc vote to a southern presidential aspirant contesting against a northern aspirant with northern delegates expected to do same and those northern delegates or states that did not toe that pattern labeled as not believing in national unity? The same attitude was expected and exhibited in the general presidential election. All of a sudden it is conveniently being forgotten that the north overwhelmingly dumped their own, Alhaji Othman Bashir Tofa for Chief M.K.O. Abiola in the 1993 elections and massively repeated the same for General Obasanjo in 1999. Some commentators are now labeling the north that voted Buhari as anti unity or as sectionalists. Are historical voting records, which will showcase who the real sectionalists and tribalists are, missing even before rapture? Therefore without doubt, the responsibility of the post-election violence should be and must be placed on the shoulders of the P.D.P. They raised a very large army of unemployed, frustrated and angry youth through their corrupt practices and then capped it by dishonestly resolving their zoning brouhaha and then wanted 25% from the region cheated why wouldn’t there be such backlash.
So, you see clearly General Buhari became a victim of the backfiring of the P.D.P.’s long term mischief. The national youth corps members that were killed were also victims of this mischief. In the elections preceding the presidential vote there were media reports of youth corps members working as ad-hoc staff caught aiding and abetting vote rigging in favour of the P.D.P. in most northern states, then came the presidential vote and its complications. Complications because southern and Church going national youth service corps members working as INEC ad-hoc staff got caught in the web of corrupt and thieving P.D.P. governors who were determined to secure 25% of the votes for a desperate southern presidential candidate of the thieving party, and these ad-hoc staff probably heard in Church to “vote according to faith”, and so, what coincidence! They became victims of this notorious coincidence. I have heard people say why did the riots break out in places the General won, and why did the riots start even before the final result tally was made. It all boils down to this 25% stuff. Reports were of course filtering in that General Buhari was winning mere 5, 000 votes in southern states, the vote tally expressing how much they love him as a Muslim Hausa/Fulani northerner and then here was Goodluck Jonathan whom they had every reason to be angry with polling hundreds of thousands in their own domain. It just doesn’t add up. Whatever factor they thought made Goodluck Jonathan very popular in the south and correspondingly made General Buhari unpopular there could also be the same factor that made General Buhari popular in the north and correspondingly made Goodluck Jonathan unpopular there, except of course, I know that, that factor cannot be anti-corruption or patriotism, for on these the General stood and still stands in good stead. In the case of Goodluck Jonathan, logically speaking, he stood and still stands more unpopular in the north for cheating them of their rightful turn at the presidency. I have read suggestions from hitherto reasonable analysts and columnists suggesting that General Buhari couldn’t have expected to win the elections because he had no structures in the south. For example, Eddy Odivwri who writes for This Day newspaper, in his column (polscope) on page 56 of their edition of Saturday, April 30, 2011 titled, Buhari: If the Truth Be Told said, “Buhari is popular in the north, not in the south. Yet, he made no effort to specially court the south. He took the south for granted…” Somewhere in the same article he contradicted this claim by saying, “The widespread acceptance of Buhari’s nascent Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) should have even gladdened him, rather than give him a false status of a political conquistador. Here was a political party that is less than 20 months old. And within such a short time had had such flaming spread across the country, with a good following.” Did you notice the sudden transition? From “not popular in the south” to “flaming spread across the country, with a good following” and “widespread acceptance.” This gave me more evidence that sentiments rather than capability was whipped up by the P.D.P. in collaboration with some Christian clergy to defeat the General. On the Hausa service of the Voice of America broadcast at 6am on Wednesday, May 11, 2011, Hon. Usman Bugaje, the erstwhile National Secretary of the A.C.N. was asked why his party seemed to have delivered for the P.D.P. in their strong hold, the south-west. He answered that President Goodluck Jonathan came and held several meetings with several groups in Lagos, and he consistently impressed on them that he was the only Christian and ethnic minority in the contest among the major contenders. This can be true; for the president had no selling point other than sentiments, including the false claim to niceness, meekness and humility as if these were not the uniform the devil wore to be able to deceive Eve in the Garden of Eden. Such a president! This is the “structures” his supporters and handlers are trumpeting he has nationwide and of which General Buhari doesn’t have. Eddy Odivwri again: “What is more, the rave of revolution supposedly sparked by Buhari derives strongly from his military portraiture as a no-nonsense man. He is generally believed to be a firm, honest, and disciplined man. Yes! But anyone who will lead such a complex country like Nigeria, will require far more than these threesome virtues. Under a democracy, most of the tough image associated with Buhari would have been weakened or diluted.” Can you imagine that? Mr. Eddy Odivwri conceded that the General is generally considered to be a man of integrity, but that the sum of the virtues that make integrity are not enough, that he should have weakened or diluted his character because of democracy, meaning he should have been a little bit of a thief, a little bit of a liar, a little bit of a womanizer, a little bit of a drunk, a little bit of a disco freak, a little bit of D’Banj interviews, a little bit of a homosexual, a little bit of a ritualist, a little bit an occult and a little bit corrupt to gain acceptance. Was this what the clergy wanted? Was this the requirement to win in the south? Was this the much vaunted structures Buhari was and is being lampooned of not having nationwide? So these are the structures the P.D.P. has been using to “win” elections – diluted integrity? I use to think that the structures a political party should use for winning elections are roads, electricity, jobs, water supply, healthcare, medicare, transportation, good salaries, education and security, I didn’t know that the global standards have changed and that the new structures are a gang of party thugs ready for a dime to snatch ballot papers and boxes and to kill if need be, a gang of criminals wearing clean clothes masquerading as party officials and loads of cash originally meant for public works and services. Well, the General can rest assured that even his detractors know that he has unimpeachable character, which the people want. But the corrupt elite and the beneficiaries of corruption have deployed the entire arsenal at their disposal, including co-opting uninformed clergy whom they know the people revere to abuse the minds of the voters against him. The General can rest knowing that no one in Nigeria can point a finger at him and say “you are a thief”, whereas the criminals in power cannot have this singular honour. Even their supporters know they are thieves.
Somehow, I think deep down among the P.D.P. elite circle they know, and will not admit publicly, that those youth corps members gruesomely murdered were murdered because of them, hence the guilt-driven gift of five million Naira to each of their surviving families. Otherwise, youth corps members have been killed in national service before, why was such gesture not done to them before? And come to think of it; a life is a life, so what happens to the several other victims of the violence? It is even more irritating and annoying that the thieving P.D.P. seemed to have benefitted even more from the riots, because several of their corrupt governors that were set to lose the gubernatorial elections capitalized on the curfew they imposed with glee to snatch, stuff and rig the ballot because the voters could no longer monitor and protect their votes. A case of eating your cake and having it! Well, a wise man said somewhere that you can only keep a man down only if you are sure he will not rise again. The P.D.P.’s mischief will crystallize into their final consumption by the inferno they have stoked all over the country. That is why I find these so cheap for hire funny characters like Yunana Shibkau and his newly created and equally so cheap for hire organization who are calling for the arrest of General Buhari and even calling for the deregistration of the General’s party, the C.P.C. on the laughable claim that the party is a terrorist organization as people lacking in sound values and can be conveniently described as, morally bankrupt and therefore shameless. Pray, if any organization in Nigeria qualifies to be called a terror organization in reference to Shibkau’s context is there any one that will snatch that inglorious name or title from the P.D.P.? Who are the politicians that have been importing arms since 2003 to rig elections? Who are the politicians that have been recruiting our able bodied youth to be party thugs since before 2003 elections? Who are the politicians that have been murdering political opponents since before 2003 elections? Who are the politicians that have been stealing the nation’s wealth since 1999? Who are the politicians that created the national monster called, the Niger Delta militants? Who are the politicians that officially migrated a hitherto street and motor park phrase, “do – or – die” into our political lexicon and way of life? In case he and his ilk don’t know let me quote a part of the post 2011 elections report of the Human Rights Watch: “… Human Rights Watch documented how ruling party politicians in the oil-rich Niger Delta mobilized and funded armed groups to help rig elections. That led to a sustained increase in violence and criminality in the region.” So, between the C.P.C. which is just a little over one year old and the P.D.P., which one of them is the terrorist organization, considering this available evidence by the Human Rights Watch? By this evidence, all the kidnappings, oil bunkering, armed robberies and all other crimes that got their roots from the Niger Delta and which have spread like wild fire to other parts of the country are the handcraft of the P.D.P. So, shouldn’t the P.D.P. be reported to the United Nations and World Criminal Court of Justice at The Hague for corrupting and criminalizing our country? That’s why I find it strange that the Church should be found supporting any one in the P.D.P. Is President Goodluck Jonathan not among the P.D.P. elite in the Niger Delta indicted by this Human Rights Watch report? Could he have come this far without being part and parcel of them?
Greed, selfishness, lack of compassion and lack of sense of sacrifice and justice have polarized the nation now as evidenced by the aftermath of the presidential elections. Before the death of President Yar’Adua there was some relative peace and national unity, but all that have been frittered away by opportunism. There are screaming voices from southern Nigeria, including some Christian clergy for the review or the scrapping of the N.Y.S.C. scheme, a subtle way of asking southerners to avoid the north. And what about the Churches in the north, mostly attended by southerners doing business or working for federal agencies? Do we review their existence in the north also? If yes, then what happens to evangelism? So, who bails the nation out of this? Who will unite the nation for national peace and harmony? Evidently, President Jonathan cannot, for the north, excluding his fans in the middle belt, views him with contempt. The traditional rulers in the north have lost credibility; therefore they cannot be a uniting force. You cannot even try it with any P.D.P. big wig in the north for obvious reasons. So, who then?
The only group that can successfully unite this nation and make it work now is the Church. Yes, the Church. The Church has taken sides in the cantankerous elections, which makes her an interested party but she has what it takes to restore the peace and unity of the nation. How? By simply making sure there is accountability and integrity in governance in Nigeria, for when the Church is seen, not just heard, taking steps and making sure governance works to the benefit of the majority and not a few the Church will not only recover her public prestige before men but also before God. A simple case of turning the Salt which has lost its savour from good for nothing to good for something, and then the Lord, the Owner of the Salt will cause her not to be trodden under foot of men. Dr. Francis Bola Akin-John, the founder and president of Church Growth Ministries International and the International Centre for Church Health, Lagos in an interview published on page 40 of the Nation newspaper of Saturday, April 30, 2011 said, “The Church should stand for the oppressed and pray for leaders. If there is failure in government and there is also failure of the Church, we are finished as a nation.” This is scary – the possibility of government and the Church failing at the same time. But we have been having failed governments for a long time, and this is why the Church cannot afford to fail. She must step up to the plate to ensure governments do not fail; to make sure governments provide high quality services to the public. God buttressed this mandate thus: “Son of man, I have made thee a watchman unto the house of Israel: therefore hear the word at my mouth, and give them warning from me.” Ezekiel 3:17. This is a prophetic call to accountability given the Church, which the Church must not fail in. Remember, “For the time is come that judgement must begin at the house of God…..” The only hope or remedy out of the fierce judgement of God is for the Church to restore her mandate, which is ensuring accountability in the society. And what a perfect way to start, she can start with the Goodluck Jonathan government which is her baby. And here is how:
1. On the eve of the presidential election there were media reports that President Goodluck Jonathan spent N250 billion to influence the election his way. This sum excludes the N100 million per day, which Prof. Pat Utomi alleged that the President spent per day during his campaign tour. The President has not denied these allegations up till now. The electoral law requests that presidential aspirants or candidates are not expected to spend more than N1 billion in campaigns. Therefore the Church leadership should demand the President and all other presidential candidates and gubernatorial candidates to disclose to the public how much they spent, and what were the sources of their funding. The Church must not relent on this, even if it means calling on the entire congregation on the streets.
2. Where anyone of the candidates has been found wanting in breach of the electoral finance law the Church should ensure such a one is dealt with as the law requires.
3. The Church should send a bill to the National Assembly requesting for the removal of the immunity clause from our constitution. This clause has not helped Nigeria and Nigerians one bit, rather it has been serially abused and used to steal public funds massively. We have seen recently how a serving governor was arrested in the U.S.A. for committing a crime. President Jonathan will not and cannot canvass for the removal of this clause; it was never in his campaign promises, for it has helped him and his party to plunder this nation. Rather it was General Buhari and the other candidates that have made it one of their priorities. So, the Church must vigorously pursue this as a goal even if it means marching on the streets for days, weeks and months non-stop.
4. The Church should actively canvass for a law that will make it a crime against the three tiers of government for any village, town or city to be found without well asphalted roads, pipe borne water, electricity, well equipped hospitals, schools and sanitary facilities.
5. The Church should also actively canvass for the removal of the privilege of Governors and Presidents enjoying unaccountable funds called “security vote”, with such funds channeled to the budget of security agencies, since they are the bodies saddled with security of lives and property.
6. The Church should march massively and severally non-stop to the National Assembly demanding them to revert to the genuine salaries and allowances lawfully prescribed them by the Revenue Mobilization and Fiscal Commission, demand the abolition of them doing or collecting funds for “constituency projects” which is clearly the job of the executive arm and to also demand a drastic cut in the budget of the parliament, for even with their hefty allowances they have turned their “oversight functions” into money spinners for themselves, otherwise why are the very places they do “oversight” on full of corruption and other sharp practices?
7. The Church should canvass for the adequate funding of the education sector in both the federal and states level.
8. The Church should canvass for the institutionalization of a social service welfare scheme where the aged and the jobless can be catered for.
9. Finally, the Church must continue to exert her influence in demanding accountability and good governance irrespective of who is in government.
2. Where anyone of the candidates has been found wanting in breach of the electoral finance law the Church should ensure such a one is dealt with as the law requires.
3. The Church should send a bill to the National Assembly requesting for the removal of the immunity clause from our constitution. This clause has not helped Nigeria and Nigerians one bit, rather it has been serially abused and used to steal public funds massively. We have seen recently how a serving governor was arrested in the U.S.A. for committing a crime. President Jonathan will not and cannot canvass for the removal of this clause; it was never in his campaign promises, for it has helped him and his party to plunder this nation. Rather it was General Buhari and the other candidates that have made it one of their priorities. So, the Church must vigorously pursue this as a goal even if it means marching on the streets for days, weeks and months non-stop.
4. The Church should actively canvass for a law that will make it a crime against the three tiers of government for any village, town or city to be found without well asphalted roads, pipe borne water, electricity, well equipped hospitals, schools and sanitary facilities.
5. The Church should also actively canvass for the removal of the privilege of Governors and Presidents enjoying unaccountable funds called “security vote”, with such funds channeled to the budget of security agencies, since they are the bodies saddled with security of lives and property.
6. The Church should march massively and severally non-stop to the National Assembly demanding them to revert to the genuine salaries and allowances lawfully prescribed them by the Revenue Mobilization and Fiscal Commission, demand the abolition of them doing or collecting funds for “constituency projects” which is clearly the job of the executive arm and to also demand a drastic cut in the budget of the parliament, for even with their hefty allowances they have turned their “oversight functions” into money spinners for themselves, otherwise why are the very places they do “oversight” on full of corruption and other sharp practices?
7. The Church should canvass for the adequate funding of the education sector in both the federal and states level.
8. The Church should canvass for the institutionalization of a social service welfare scheme where the aged and the jobless can be catered for.
9. Finally, the Church must continue to exert her influence in demanding accountability and good governance irrespective of who is in government.
The Church can do all of the above and more by engaging the services of the abundant lawyers in her midst and her members in the parliament. That way the Church will be reckoned with, and any government or a part of it or any agency that wants to misbehave will reckon that the Church will come after her. This is where and how the Church will have dominion and real power over the affairs of the nation, but not in merely endorsing questionable politicians. In engaging government to be accountable the Church must expect reactionary forces and the beneficiaries of corruption to begin to say the usual nonsense like, “the Church should leave politics alone”, “the Clergy have no business with governance”, “there should be a separation of the State and religion”, blah, blah, blah. But we know this is false. Religion is best placed to serve the purpose of regulation and moderation of human conduct. A nation with active religious presence and influence is well placed to avoid being a banana republic, which Nigeria seems headed to, and we cannot afford to be a banana republic. A wise man, Peter Kay said humorously of such a republic that, “You never know where to look when eating a banana.”
I know the Church can force a positive turn around for our nation for one reason. In the heat of the rage over the killing of the ten youth service corps members in Bauchi, the Bishop, Diocese of Lagos West Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion), Dr. Peter Awelewa Adebiyi was reported on page 55 of the Nation newspaper of Friday, May 13, 2011 in a story captioned Bishop threatens showdown on NYSC reform and written by Dada Aladelokun (Assistant Editor) saying, “We will continue to harp on it and I enjoin every member of this Church and all well-meaning Nigerians to support us in this crusade. And I make bold to say that if the government will not heed our call, I will lead this congregation on a march on the National Assembly. We can no longer condone this wanton killing of our future leaders.” The Bishop was making a case for the review of the N.Y.S.C. scheme where possibly graduates could be posted to their states or regions to serve. But what struck me was the realization that the clergy knew they could bring out their congregation to march on the street or march on any arm of government to demand for change and yet, all this while that government upon government were serially raping and plundering our resources they kept mute. Don’t tell me that they have been speaking to rulers privately, for the Bible says in Proverbs 27:5 that “Open rebuke is better than secret love.” I was excited that at least the Church has jerked back to life and to her calling. So, let us move on.
In the thick of the dilly dally by the National Assembly and late President Yar’Adua’s cabinet last year over whether to pass a resolution declaring the then sick President incapacitated in order to make way for then Vice President Goodluck Jonathan to become Acting President, Pastor Mrs. Sarah Amakwu, Senior Pastor, Family Worship Centre, Abuja pulled her Church congregation to join the march organized by the Save Nigeria Group led by Pastor Tunde Bakare, Mr. Femi Falana (SAN), Mrs. Naja’atu Mohammed, Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, Prof. Wole Soyinka and other leaders of Civil Society Organizations calling on the National Assembly and the cabinet to declare the sick President incapacitated. The unrelenting pressure they mounted caused the dithering Senate to do the right thing, and Vice President Goodluck Jonathan was declared Acting President. I have observed with amusement how shady politicians and some media people are now attributing that feat to Senate President David Mark in order for him to retain the senate presidency, conveniently forgetting that he led the most over paid, underperforming and most corrupt parliament in the world. The same pressure was exerted by the same individuals and organizations to compel an also dithering President Goodluck Jonathan to send Prof. Maurice Iwu to an inglorious retirement, for it seemed he and his party were intent on retaining Prof. Iwu’s injurious services which had served them well at the expense of the nation. The same pressure by the same persons and groups caused government to look outside some suggested questionable characters that were being bandied about as possible replacement for Prof. Iwu. President Jonathan is now being cleverly credited with that feat also; in fact it was part of his campaigns songs. As time flies, if you are not careful, it will carry your memory along its wings into mental recession. That’s my quote.
The point here is the Church can take the lead in organizing marches, walks or sit-ins against cases of injustice, corruption and sit-tight rulers. Great man of God, Pastor Enoch Adeboye, the G.O. of the Redeemed Christian Church of God was widely reported last year to have said he will lead his Church in protest if the 2011 elections were fraudulent. This is commendable. The presidential elections, and even the other elections could not be said to have been fair; the rigging commenced when the ruling party rigged out a zone that was supposed to produce the candidate for the election, and the rigging continued up to the presidential primaries where delegates had their status changed to dollargates, and it went through to the general elections where money and incumbency proved decisive. This much was also testified by Rev. Moses Iloh, the Shepherd-in-charge of Soul-Winning Ministries, Lagos. The man of God was quoted by Gabriel Dike, a Sun newspaper reporter on page 13 of their Tuesday, May 17, 2011 edition in a story titled 2011 polls, most sophisticated electoral fraud – Rev Moses Iloh as saying, “the secret agendum was to ensure victory at all costs for Mr. President at the polls in the full consciousness that Nigeria parades the most disreputable, conscienceless and despicable judiciary when it comes to election tribunals…..there was no control limit placed on funds to be expended on the election campaign. There was no question that it was government’s scarce funds that were irresponsibly wasted on campaign funding by the incumbents.” Earlier in the story the reporter said the man of God referred to the election as the most expensive, sophisticated, highly educated and well-mannered electoral fraud in the history of the country despite the determination of Nigerians to protect their votes. On the consequence of the Church’s bias in the elections the man of God said, “The polity was violently raped and now pregnant with two dangerous bastards: religion and tribalism. When the pregnancy matured and these monsters are delivered, they will at birth, show up with 32 fully matured teeth.” Scary situation Nigeria has been walked into, you might agree. Well, the protest marches as proposed by God’s servant Pastor Adeboye should not be limited to elections issues alone; it should be commenced and sustained for good governance. This is one of the ways in which the Spirit of the Church will be felt in society compelling positive change. It is this attitude that fuelled and is still fuelling the mass uprisings in almost all the Arab States, whose living standards are far beyond those of Nigerians. Yet, they are determined to create a better society for themselves. Some Christians may be scoffing at them, even assuming that it could be a divine confusion set among them, but the Lord has a Word for them thus: “And the lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely: for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.” Luke 16:8. So, the children of light (the Church) watch idly and even endorse corrupt politicians to be plundering the resources of God and as they are plundering they will be praying for them in Church for “wisdom and divine guidance” while others elsewhere are determined that such plunder cannot be. So, who is wiser? That Scripture has given the answer clearly.
The Church must rise up to her calling of societal accountability, so that thievery in government will stop, for no society can afford to have people with inherent inclination to stealing public funds as leaders because of the spiritual implication of this negative inclination: “….This is the curse that goeth forth over the face of the whole earth: for every one that stealeth shall be cut off…. I will bring it forth, saith the LORD of hosts, and it shall enter into the house of the thief, and into the house of him that sweareth falsely by my name: and it shall remain in the midst of his house, and shall consume it with the timber thereof and the stones thereof.” Zechariah 5:3 & 4. So, the penalty for a thief and those who use God’s name fraudulently is shared with their household without exemption. Little wonder Nigeria has not been doing well in spite of prayers like, “O’ Lord, bless our leaders with wisdom and guide them.” If the Church leads the way in the fight against mis-governance she would of course be joined by the rest of society, bringing healing and unity of purpose in the society and ultimately restoring the honour of the Church. Do I even have to say the Church will be feared by evil forces?
The book of Acts of the Apostles does not read Prayers of the Apostles. No, it showed the Apostles engaging in civil disobediences against what was wrong. While they were praying they were also acting. Good example of faith without works being dead. Nigeria must rank as the most praying nation in the world, but it should not stop there. There must be physical involvement. God will not come down in Person to remove evil from society, no. He works with us and through us. There should be no reason why Nigeria with plenty of Churches should not be better off than churchless nations like Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, China, Indonesia, etc.
The Lord Jesus Christ said a parable about the sleeping Church and the consequence thus: “…..The Kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field: But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way.” Matthew 13:24 & 25. So, as the Church slept, the devil came and sowed the tares of corruption, kidnappings, thefts, robberies and all manner of violence and evil, and Nigerians are in tears caused by these tares! As the Church slept, the devil anointed political leaders for the nation and masterfully, characteristically and deceptively presented them to the Church for their signature. This sleep should end!
Ironically, a Nigerian pastor, Sunday Adelaja was used mightily by God to bring a revolutionary change in Ukraine in 2005 by pulling out his large congregation unto the streets of the capital, Kiev. He detailed his story in his book CHURCH SHIFT. In Nigeria, we have pastors that pull large crowds in miracle or healing conventions. The congregations revere them to the point of total adoration and submission. Can they now harness this gift to change this nation radically in order to escape God’s imminent judgement? It is called Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR. It is time.
| Presidential polls: CPC asks Tribunal to declare Buhari winner From GODWIN TSA Abuja Friday, August 12, 2011
The Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) has asked the Presidential Election Tribunal to enter judgment in favour of its presidential candidate, General Muhammadu Buhari on the grounds that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has flouted the order of the tribunal directing it to allow the party to inspect the materials used for the April 16 presidential election. The action of the party was contained in a motion on notice brought pursuant to paragraphs 18 (11) of the 1st schedule to the Electoral Act 2010 (as amended), section 145 (d) of the Evidence Act and under the inherent powers of the Tribunal. In a statement in Abuja by its National Publicity Secretary, Rotimi Fashakin and entitled, “Aftermath of INEC’S intransigence: CPC files motion for judgment” the party specifically said it is seeking the following reliefs: *An order of this Honourable Court entering Judgment in favor of the Petitioner in Petition No. CA/A/EPT/PRES/1/2011 under Paragraph 18 (11) of the 1st Schedule to the Electoral Act, 2010 as amended and Section 149 of the Evidence Act on the ground that the order for inspection granted by this Honourable Court on the 24th day of May, 2011 is refusal or failure or neglect of the Respondent s to comply with the terms contained in the said order. *And for such further or other orders as this Honourable Tribunal may deem fit to make in the circumstances. The grounds upon which the application is based are: *That the Petitioner was one of the registered political parties that contested the Presidential Election held on the 16th day of April, 2011 and had in consequence thereof demanded for election materials from the 1st Respondent vide series of letters written to that effect before, during and at the conclusion of the election. *That 1st and 2nd Respondents denied the Petitioner’s request by failing to make copies of the requested election materials available to the Applicant and the Applicant was as a result forced to file an application dated the 15th May, 2011 for an order directing the 1st and 2nd Respondents to produce for the inspection of the Applicants and permitting it to take copies of the election material used in the conduct of the election. *That this Honourable Court had on the 24th day of May, 2011 granted an order pursuant to the application referred to in paragraph 2 above in the following terms: *An order that INEC shall grant the Petitioner and any other party in the petition their counsel agents or experts access to the biometric Data Base created by the DDC machines for register of voters, used at the Presidential Election held on 16th April, 2011. INEC shall give notice to parties as to time, date and place for such exercise provided that the absence of a party duly notified shall not delay such exercise. * AN ORDER that INEC shall grant access to the Petitioner and any other party to the petition, their counsel and their experts, to inspect and take certified True Copy (CTC) of election materials i.e. a) Register of Voters used in all the Polling Units at Presidential Election held on 16/04/2011. b) Electoral Forms EC8 A, B, C, D & E c) Manual for the Election d) List of Officials of INEC including adhoc staff who participated in the conduct of the election. e) Records of Ballot papers distribution throughout the Federation. f) Ballot papers used in the Presidential Election held on 16/04/2011. B. Access for inspection and taking of copies of the election materials shall be at the statutory location of such election materials i.e. (i) Custody of Resident Electoral Commissioners in various states. (ii) Custody Chairman of INEC Provided all necessary official fees for such certification are paid. *That the Respondents have colluded to frustrate the execution of the Order and contended, among others, that they would not allow access to the database which they claimed is not necessary for the proof of the Petitioner’s case. *That even though the order for inspection was granted early enough in the proceeding, the Applicants’ efforts to take advantage of the order was met with series of frustrations evidenced by exhibits 1 – 12. The Tribunal had adjourned proceedings on the main appeal to August 15, 2011 at the instance of the party. |
Jonathan, Buhari in fresh rowBy 8 hours 36 minutes ago  President Goodluck Jonathan / Buhari -Ripples over alleged plot to disallow CPC access to April poll materials -I have no cause to conspire with INEC to frustrate Buhari, says Jonathan -INEC says court will decide the truth THERE are fresh ripples over alleged plot to disallow the former presidential candidate of the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC), Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, from having access to election materials used for the April presidential election. President Goodluck Jonathan, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) are alleged to be behind the plot. But counsel to the President, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN) said Jonathan has no cause to conspire with anybody to prevent Buhari from conducting forensic analysis. Also, INEC said although it has done its best to satisfy the request of all litigants before election tribunals, it will amount to subjudice to respond to Buhari's application before the Presidential Election Tribunal. A top source in CPC said: “Our party is suspecting that there is pressure on INEC from the presidency and the PDP to frustrate our plans to have access to electoral materials to conduct forensic analysis. “They are aware that elections did not hold in some areas and they cannot produce poll materials to add up. “We cannot understand why INEC which had earlier accepted to allow us access to poll documents, based on the order of the tribunal, has suddenly changed its tune. “The uncovering of the plot informed why our candidate filed a fresh application before the court specifically to ask the tribunal to declare him as the validly elected presidential candidate for April general elections. “The application was brought pursuant to Paragraph 18(11) of the 1st Schedule to the Electoral Act, 2010 as amended, Section 149 (d) of the Evidence Act.” In a swift reaction, Jonathan’s lead counsel, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN) said Buhari was crying wolf where there is none. He said: “It is only unfortunate that rather than the CPC concentrating on their petition they are busy prosecuting their case on the pages of newspapers. “Let me tell you my dear, we have no reason to conspire with INEC or anybody to stop Buhari and CPC from having access to election materials. I don’t believe that Jonathan has any cause to do that. Instead, the President has been prosecuting his case through his counsel diligently. “Since this case started, we have never for one day asked for an adjournment. It was the CPC that asked for extension of time for pre-hearing. And instead of asking for three days, they asked for 14 days. The court wanted to give a specific date for hearing, they asked for 14 days to extend the time for pre-hearing. “If they have not had access to election materials as they claimed, Nigerians should ask them what of oral witnesses, why don’t they start with that? We have not asked for a single adjournment but they have done that. “For a case that will be statute barred in November, we are still at the pre-hearing case because of the attitude of the CPC. Yet, it is only when pre-hearing closes that the court will now adjourn and write a report that will regulate the trial. “They sought some reliefs from the Court of Appeal but the court struck out two of these reliefs including their plea that the tribunal should order a re-run of the presidential poll. They have now appealed against the ruling of the Court of Appeal. As I am talking to you we have also filed an application before the Supreme Court that since their main prayer for a re-run poll has been struck out by the Court of Appeal, there is nothing to determine again by the Presidential Election Tribunal “Nigerians should appreciate what is at stake. The CPC is not saying that Buhari should be declared the winner of the last presidential election, they are asking for a re-run. And their major prayer for re-run has been rejected by the tribunal. What is left of their application at the tribunal will be a mere academic exercise. “Nobody is frustrating CPC but they are preoccupied with adjournment and trial on the pages of newspapers.” On his part, the Chief Press Secretary to INEC Chairman, Mr. Kayode Idowu, said: “Since the matter is still in court, it is subjudice to make any comment. But I know that we have been fair to all parties.” Notwithstanding, Buhari is insisting that he should be declared the winner of the poll since INEC has denied him access to election materials for forensic analysis. In a document obtained last night, the CPC’s candidate gave the details of what transpired. He said: “The Applicant was not satisfied with the declared result and in consequence notified the 1st and 2nd Respondent of its decision to contest the declaration and reiterated its demand for election materials by its letter dated the 20th day of April, 2011, among others, a copy of which is shown to me and attached hereto as Exhibit 4 “That 1st and 2nd Respondents denied the Petitioner’s request by failing to make copies of the requested election materials available to the Applicant and the Applicant was as a result forced to file an application dated the 15th May, 2011 for an order directing the 1st and 2nd Respondents to produce for the inspection of the Applicants and permitting it to take copies of the election material used in the conduct of the election. “That series of objections were filed by the Respondents by which the competence of the Petitioner’s petition was challenged after the grant of the order and exchange of petition and respective replies to the petition filed by the Respondents. “That the 3rd and 4th Respondents, the 5th Respondents and lastly the 1st, 2nd, 6th -42nd Respondents filed applications for preliminary objections to the Applicants petition on 23rd, June, 2011, 15th June, 2011 and 23rd June, 2011 respectively “That so much time was wasted in the cause of hearing the objections before they were eventually taken on the 6th day of July, 2011 save for the objection filed on behalf of the 1st, 2nd, 6th -42nd Respondents that was withdrawn and struck out. “That on the 14th day of July, 2011 this Honourable Tribunal adjudged the Applicant’s petition competent in a considered ruling. “That even though the order for inspection was granted early enough in the proceeding, the Applicants’ efforts to take advantage of the order was met with series of frustrations notwithstanding the ruling of the 14th day of July, 2011 by which the competence of the Applicant’s petition was sustained. “That the Petitioner was as a result not accorded access to the election materials and data base and a resolution was eventually passed that parties should have further recourse to this Honorable Court for the interpretation of the word access as used in the order of the Court dated the 24th day of May, 2011. “Meanwhile parties met on the 26th day of July 2011 with a view to commence the forensic exercise in the restricted manner convenient to Respondent while the broader interpretation of the word ‘access” was to be sought from Court, only for the Counsel for the (Counsel for the 4th and 5th Respondents) to demand for the further postponement of the exercise on the ground that the 4th and 5th “Respondent’s team of expert were not available for the meeting and they could not concede to the progress of the exercise in their absence “That a further postponement of the meeting was reluctantly conceded to by the Applicant and the meeting was in consequence adjourned to the 8th day of August, 2011 to enable the 5th Respondent assembled its team of experts for the exercise. “That I was informed by Sama’ila Alasa Esq. one of the Applicant’s Counsel in this petition at about 12.30pm on Monday, the 8th day of August, 2011 at the National Headquarters of the Applicant of Plot 1132, Festus Okotie Eboh Crescent, Utako District, Abuja and I verily believe him to be true and correct that the forensic exercise meeting of the 8th day of August 2011 was aborted largely by the Respondents and an affidavit of facts narrating the events that led to the abortion of the meeting of the 8th August, 2011 as deposed to by him is shown to me and attached hereto as Exhibit 14 “That I was informed by Mr. Ocholi James (SAN) one of the Applicant’s lead Counsel in this petition at about 3 p.m on Thursday, the 4th day of August, 2011 at his office at No. 108, Idris Gidado Street, Wuye District, Abuja and I verily believe him to be true and correct as follows: “That the Respondents have manipulated the word access as used in the order of this Honorable Court to frustrate the inspection of the election materials. “That the order for inspection granted by this Honourable Court on the 24th day of May, 2011 is not being complied with by the Respondents. “That this Honourable Court can enter Judgment in favour of the Petitioner in the circumstances of the frustrations of the Court order by the Respondents |
Why I won’t reject calls to be PDP chairman -TukurWritten by Idowu Samuel, Editor, North-East /North Central Bureau, in Abuja Wednesday, 13 July 2011  Alhaji Bamanga Tukur You seem to have withdrawn to the background politically for some time until recently when you were touted as a possible chairman of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). Why was your interest that low in politics? That is not true. I am an experienced politician and you know politicians do not retire, but you don’t expect me at my age to be running up and down looking for political patronage. If I begin to do that, where lies the fate of young men and women like you who still have the energy to serve. You have not been seeing me in the open playing politics, but people like me do not relent in ensuring that things work well in this country. I am an elderstatesman and I can speak with any body in power, either at the state or federal level and say this is what he or she can do to make things better and I don’t need to shout on top of may voice to do that. I have been playing good roles in making this country to move forward and there is no need to make noise about it. As an elder statesman, what is the state of the nation to you, now? We have not been doing badly, no matter what critics say. It is through a democratic process that the present government was formed. We are happy about that and it is because the last elections were well acknowledged. There is nothing perfect in human endeavour. We will make mistakes and we will correct the mistakes by our own wisdom, so we are learning, and this is not a bad beginning. Secondly, we are lucky to have a young president who is equally educated and eager to work. He does not have any baggage to worry about. He made many promises during campaigns and now is the time to sit down to work out how to fulfil those promises. He has started appointing his ministers and we hope that that will drive the process and draw him close to fulfilling the promises he had made. I am encouraged because the rest of the world can now begin to look up to Nigeria for leadership. Our job by now is to support the President, package him and make him the focal point of leadership not only in Nigeria, but also in Africa. By doing this, we hope to see the emergence of United States of Africa one day. That is my own dream. It can only happen if we begin to build the foundation, and we are already building the foundation. What needs to be done now is to mobilise Nigerians in support of the present administration to address the challenges confronting it so that there will be less crisis and rancour and for the government to address our immediate areas of needs, including Infrastructure, agriculture, health, power, youth development, employment and others. Now that a new cabinet is evolving, we pray that the President will give a matching order to the ministers to focus keen attention on these areas of needs. They are all critical portfolios and again the expectation is that the ministers would not look back in performing their duties so that they will give the kind of results that the President and the rest of Nigeria have been expecting. The state of national economy seems to be bothering most Nigerians. Are you also worried and what to you is the way forward? Yes, the present moment is difficult for Nigeria. But Nigeria is not the only country passing through economic stress. It cuts across the whole world, most especially, the so called developed countries. If you talk about Nigeria, just take a look at Greece, the old Greece. See what is happening there. The same thing is happening in the United States and of course you can see that the British government has been grappling with protests from the labour unions. France is also affected in a way, so it is a global phenomenon. It is a new era in the global economy and the reason is that people have developed to a certain stage and their expectations are getting higher and almost difficult to meet and so people take to agitation. That is the problem. So how do we get out of this problem in Nigeria? We do that by a proper re-orientation. The government must insist on this and then drive the populace to work harder, get more focussed and committed to a growth process for the national economy. Most importantly, we Nigerians should learn how to accommodate one another and to allow peace to reign. Nigeria is facing a stiff security challenge at the moment with the unrest in some parts of the North at the instance of a religious sect. what do you think is the way out? The reason we are facing these kinds of problems is because we allow our young population to stay idle and so they would be restive. The starting point for us is to start planning for the youth. We have to go back to the drawing board to fashion out the ways and means of making the Nigerian youth get more engaged. It is important for the government to get the statistics of enrolment in schools from primary level up to tertiary and the number of them that are graduating annually so that special programmes could be designed for them. The problem we have in this country is that we do not seem to have realised the potentialities in the Nigerian youth and how they could be used to turn things around. If you look at it critically, we always have a young population which means that if the bulk of the people who constitute the population are somewhat engaged, there would be a limit to youth restiveness and agitation in Nigeria. We have to address the problem of youth unemployment before it gets too late. That is the idea. Corruption seems to be another major problem confronting Nigeria. How do we tackle that? Yes, the problem is getting more alarming and endemic. So how do we tackle that? It is simply by making sure that those found to be guilty of acts of corruption with strong proofs are not allowed to escape justice. If people are suspected to be plundering the public sector or demanding things that do not belong to them, they should be sanctioned, and the sanction must be correct and firm. The political relationship between the North and the South turned sour over the issue of zoning during the last general election. What are you elders doing to tackle the problem? It is all political and I believe with time we will overcome it. Now, there have been reports that Bamanga has been tipped for PDP national chairmanship. If that is the case what can people like us do if not to unite this federation with such an opportunity? For me I do not see any sacrifice as too great or too little for this country to remain united, indivisible and indissoluble. There is every need to cement the divide between the North and South in terms of political harmony in order to heal the bruises. Mechanism must be put in place for us to call people to a round table to see that we resolve and document popular agreement on zoning so that the suspicion that exists between the North and South would be a thing of the past. It is a question of appealing to everybody to come on board so that we can collectively rebuild the foundation of our national unity. Your interest in the chairmanship position of PDP still remains in the realm of speculations. Are you actually nursing the ambition to be? This is not a question of ambition. The truth is that some people feel that I can do it. I have been reading about it on the pages of newspapers, and I know that some people have been talking to me too. So, if eventually they ask me to be the National Chairman of PDP, why not? I will take it. If I do, then, for me, it is pay back time to my country. It is pay back because there is nothing the position of chairman of PDP would give me that I don’t have today. There is nothing special I will be expecting from the post at this point in my life other than to use the God given resources in me to serve the party and my country. Today, I earn respect from across the globe and I thank God that he has blessed me tremendously. The chairmanship of PDP cannot give me the recognition that I command today from across the world. If I can go up to the United Nations and address the entire world on crucial global issues and then continue to play relevant roles at that level, you can then understand what I am talking about. At the level of African Union, it is the same, in West Africa; it is the same in terms of recognition. If you head the African Business Round Table (ABR) and everybody looks up to you, that is something to me. You know, people outside the country used to call me a president without a country. They say I am a borderless President and then we will all laugh. But then, that is recognition from very high quarters at global level. So, there is nothing I cannot do to make PDP flourish if asked to be chairman, it is the party and Nigeria that will stand to gain. As the chairman ABR, what level of economic patronage have you won for Nigeria? African Business Round Table is to bring investments from any part of the world into African countries. It is also to forge business partnership among African businessmen. That is why I am also Chairman NEPAD Business Group Africa, Private Sector. What we are to ensure is a seamless partnership between the public and private sectors across Africa. It is not something you can easily measure, because our efforts are on-going. And you can see the responses in the attempts by some African countries to legislate for good laws, good government and socially responsible investment opportunities in their respective countries. Lastly, can you suggest to President Jonathan the next immediate steps he should take now that he has constituted his government? Let him direct the attention of his government immediately to the issue of security. I am aware of efforts being made already to stem the tide of crisis in some parts of the federation, but then we all need a pro-active security system to be put in place to nip in the bud any plan for breakdown of law and order wherever they may be coming from. I believe also that the President should intensify efforts on power with a view to increasing electricity supply in the country. |
Northern grandmasters, governance and 2015
Written by Idowu Samuel Wednesday, 27 July 2011
From left, Ibrahim Babangida, Aliyu Gusau, Atiku Abubakar
The contemporary politics of Nigeria has thrown up apprehensions now characterised by perceived uncanny reticent and malice by northern political grandmasters, who seem contented staying aloof, as government activities run haphazardly. From indications, the 2011 presidential election had succeeded in raising more posers, while leaving room for suspicion among major players in a manner that makes future politics more endangered.
Nigeria did not just find itself in this cul-de-sac. The failure of political elites to find a common ground on the issue of zoning actually complicated matters such that President Goodluck Jonathan appears alienated from a major section of the country, the North, which never wanted him in the saddle for obvious reasons.
Close to four months after the 2011 presidential election, the North has been in turmoil with a seeming unending bloodletting which is occurring more like an unstated protest against the political status-quo ante in the country.
Northern grandmasters after presidential poll
Before the last general election, the North, indeed, relied on its presidential candidates, represented by General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida, General Aliyu Gusau, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar and Bukola Saraki, all on the platform of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), to regain the presidential power it lost due to the death of the late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua. It also counted on the experiences of General Muhammadu Buhari of the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) to make a difference with the election. It fought to actualise its desire to reclaim the presidential power while it made very strident advocacy on return of the power through zoning. The northern political elite, led by Mallam Adamu Ciroma, added an impetus by forging a consensus among all the aspirants. It eventually narrowed down its choice of presidential candidate to Atiku who contested the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) presidential primary against President Jonathan.
Before the last general election, the North, indeed, relied on its presidential candidates, represented by General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida, General Aliyu Gusau, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar and Bukola Saraki, all on the platform of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), to regain the presidential power it lost due to the death of the late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua. It also counted on the experiences of General Muhammadu Buhari of the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) to make a difference with the election. It fought to actualise its desire to reclaim the presidential power while it made very strident advocacy on return of the power through zoning. The northern political elite, led by Mallam Adamu Ciroma, added an impetus by forging a consensus among all the aspirants. It eventually narrowed down its choice of presidential candidate to Atiku who contested the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) presidential primary against President Jonathan.
The failure by the North to get the presidential power seemed to constitute an anathema to governance at the centre today. Ciroma, who heads the Northern Political Leaders Forum, had severally decried the manner the ruling PDP addressed the issue of zoning and then ended up adopting a wait-and-see attitude to subsequent political events in the country.
In the same vein, each of the presidential aspirants had voiced dissention to the election that produced Jonathan, as they expressed reservations to his government which they believed merely usurped the slot due to the North through alleged political subterfuges. Although, the spate of unrest in some parts of the North has never been linked to any of the presidential aspirants, there is a general belief that, had the political juggernauts rallied round President Jonathan in the present critical moments in Nigeria, the activities of Boko Haram, which have been occasioning killings and destruction of properties in some parts of the North, would not have got to the peak. Worst still, since President Jonathan took the oath of office on May 29, none of the northern presidential aspirants had been seen around the corridors of power, courting the president in any form. Their resolve to stay aloof appears very conspiratorial in a manner that suggests that they are only keen in watching the outcome of their distaste with the present government.
Although the presidential election, held in April, had been lost and won, there are reasons why eyes cannot go off the northern presidential aspirants, given the tendency of each one of them to bounce back to make more statements in the politics of immediate future of Nigeria.
Ibrahim Babangida
The Minna-born General has been consistent in sticking to the standpoint of the northern elders on zoning of political offices. He had surprised Nigerians, most especially his supporters, when he backed out of the 2011 presidential race in support of the consensus candidate by the North.
The Minna-born General has been consistent in sticking to the standpoint of the northern elders on zoning of political offices. He had surprised Nigerians, most especially his supporters, when he backed out of the 2011 presidential race in support of the consensus candidate by the North.
There were times Babangida went out of his way raise voice against the manner the ruling PDP swept the issue of zoning under the carpet.
Not too long ago, when members of the House of Representatives jettisoned the zoning principle by the PDP to elect Aminu Waziri Tambuwal as Speaker, Babangida came out of his shell immediately to offer a congratulatory message and took a step further to lampoon PDP for creating chances for such rebellious tendency demonstrated by Tambuwal and his supporters.
Babangida has since been keeping to himself, while cutting short his usual vivacious movements around power. Although there were reports that Babangida had said goodbye to presidential contest in the future, yet, given his unassuming nature, it is not clear whether or not Nigerians could hold him to that.
Aliyu Gusau
Gusau, among the northern presidential aspirants, presents the most interesting story, given his present attitude to the government of President Jonathan. He was obviously the closest to Jonathan, having served as the National Security Adviser (NSA) in his government. Yet, he was the first to pull away the moment he declared his ambition to be president through the 2011 presidential election.
Gusau, among the northern presidential aspirants, presents the most interesting story, given his present attitude to the government of President Jonathan. He was obviously the closest to Jonathan, having served as the National Security Adviser (NSA) in his government. Yet, he was the first to pull away the moment he declared his ambition to be president through the 2011 presidential election.
Gusau believes in the northern cause and did everything possible to support it by suspending his aspiration to support the Northern consensus candidate. But unlike IBB, Gusau has been most taciturn since the end of the presidential election, and had not been seen, not even once, around the corridors of power where he had work for most part of his service years. It is doubtful whether Gusau, referred to in security circles as the Spy Master, had made contributions to the myriads of security challenges confronting the Jonathan government of late. Gusau is never known as a man of speeches, neither is he known as a man who loves the klieg lights, yet, the former NSA is unpredictable too. Gusau has sufficient time to make up his mind whether to make his third shots at the presidency or not by 2015, that is if age would allow him to do so by then.
Atiku Abubakar
It is not in doubt that Atiku Abubakar spearheaded the fight for the North to regain power in 2011. His past and present political antecedents have depicted him as a fighter, starting with when he confronted his former boss, Olusegun Obasanjo, on the question of ambition. It was by sheer political wizardry that Atiku outsmarted other northern presidential aspirants to emerge as the consensus candidate for the North during the April presidential election. He made no pretences about his preparedness to take over the presidential power from Jonathan in April, even up to the manifesto night when he carpeted the president vigorously. Since he lost the primary, Atiku has wound down his vibrant campaign organisation to keep a low profile. He only comments on political matters, just any time he felt the necessity. There is no underrating the former vice-president when the game of politics is involved. A foxy politician, Atiku fought valiantly from the zone of political relegation before the April presidential election to regain fame and form. He made a dramatic entry into the presidential race after re-aligning with PDP and eventually picked the nomination form.
It is not in doubt that Atiku Abubakar spearheaded the fight for the North to regain power in 2011. His past and present political antecedents have depicted him as a fighter, starting with when he confronted his former boss, Olusegun Obasanjo, on the question of ambition. It was by sheer political wizardry that Atiku outsmarted other northern presidential aspirants to emerge as the consensus candidate for the North during the April presidential election. He made no pretences about his preparedness to take over the presidential power from Jonathan in April, even up to the manifesto night when he carpeted the president vigorously. Since he lost the primary, Atiku has wound down his vibrant campaign organisation to keep a low profile. He only comments on political matters, just any time he felt the necessity. There is no underrating the former vice-president when the game of politics is involved. A foxy politician, Atiku fought valiantly from the zone of political relegation before the April presidential election to regain fame and form. He made a dramatic entry into the presidential race after re-aligning with PDP and eventually picked the nomination form.
The incumbent president and his supporters had to deploy state arts and guile in politics to subdue him in the process. The antics by Jonathan and his spin doctors really destabilised Atiku during the election. Given the advantage of age, Atiku holds a great prospect in taking another shot at the presidential seat in 2015.
Bukola Saraki
With a successful stint in government after eight years as governor of Kwara State, Bukola Saraki took a shot at the presidency in 2011. It was the best option available to him. He had mounted a robust campaign to actualise his presidential dreams, as he deployed tact and wits all the way. At a time it was difficult for the North to pick a consensus candidate, Saraki came with a proposal that he should be considered as the best option, flaunting age advantage, sound education and youthfulness as his strong points. Yet, he aligned with the decision of the northern elders to pick a consensus candidate.
With a successful stint in government after eight years as governor of Kwara State, Bukola Saraki took a shot at the presidency in 2011. It was the best option available to him. He had mounted a robust campaign to actualise his presidential dreams, as he deployed tact and wits all the way. At a time it was difficult for the North to pick a consensus candidate, Saraki came with a proposal that he should be considered as the best option, flaunting age advantage, sound education and youthfulness as his strong points. Yet, he aligned with the decision of the northern elders to pick a consensus candidate.
After the presidential election, Saraki contested and won election into the Senate. That has afforded him the scope to widen his political horizon and also the time to re-strategise politically. If he resolves, at the end of the day, to take another shot at the presidency in 2015, Saraki really has age to count on. His disposition to political issues in the Senate will determine the mileage he will gain in the future politics of Nigeria. He is one politician that the North
Kebbi Central: Tribunal Declares Aliero Winner17 Aug 2011  Senator Adamu Aliero, former FCT Minister The National and State Elections Petition Tribunal sitting in Birnin Kebbi, Kebbi State Tuesday, nullified the election of the Senator representing Kebbi Central senatorial district, Senator Abubakar Atiku Bagudu, and declared former governor of the state, Senator Adamu Aliero, as the winner of the election. The tribunal also ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to withdraw the Certificate of Return from Bagudu and issue it to Aliero as the lawful winner of the election. Aliero was former Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). Chairman of the tribunal, Justice Alero Edodo Eruaga, along with Justice Muhammad Inuwa Ali, and Justice Adedotun Grace Onibokun, in their 19-page ruling, said the application brought by Bagudu, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and INEC for the tribunal to set aside the July 30 invocation of paragraph 18(11) lacked merit. Before Tuesday’s ruling, the tribunal had on July 30, this year, invoked paragraph 18(11) of the Electoral Act on Bagudu, PDP and INEC for their failure to produce the report of their inspection of polling materials before the tribunal whereas Aliero and the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) complied.According to him, the argument of the respondents as regards the issue on report of inspection material had been contradicted, thereby compelling the tribunal to dismiss it. “Election petitions are distinct from the ordinary civil proceedings. It is such that in certain circumstances that slightest default in complying with a procedural step which otherwise could either be cured or waived in ordinary civil proceedings could result in fatal consequences to the parties, these averment were neither contradicted and/or controverted nor was there an opposition to the written addresses. “It is trite that were depositions in a counter affidavit are not specifically denied by way of a further affidavit in support of an application such evidence or deposition in the counter affidavit will be deemed as the truth of the matter and the court can act on it,” he said. “That a lack of reaction contrarily to the submission of counsel is deemed to be a concession to the point of being made. Based on the above principles of law we hereby affirmed our judgment of July 30, this year, and order the 3rd respondent to withdraw the certificate of return issued to the 1st respondent, Senator Abubakar Atiku Bagudu, of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and issue a Certificate of Return to the 1st petitioner, Senator Muhammad Adamu Aliero of the congress for progressive change as the lawful person to represent Kebbi Central Senatorial District of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,” Eruaga averred. The judge reminded the parties that the jurisdiction of an Election Tribunal to deal with election petition was a very special nature different from that of an ordinary civil case, adding that: “It is plain that the proceedings are special for which special provisions are made under the constitution.” |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)