Wednesday, 7 December 2011

Nonsense Talk About Subsidy.

Monday, December 5, 
Amene Terh
I listened this evening, 11/11/11 to one of the presidential aides in an interview about the much talked about fuel subsidy removal on political platform and I felt like I should have been close enough to give him a quality knock on the forehead.
As you continue you will see the source of my annoyance.

This guy, for obvious reasons, think subsidy should go. He is part of the government, it will be suicidal for him to say otherwise. Below are his reasons why subsidy should go. You will find also why I believe his, and by inference government's argument doesn't amount to much.

1. There is a cabal in the oil industry that fraudulently claims subsidy for volumes of supply the government cannot proof, so subsidy has to go to sanitize the industry.

So the government knows there is a cabal, and they know them? Then go after them but no, to him, the subsidy law has handicapped the government to prosecute these people. Fine, who is responsible in ascertaining the quantity of oil brought in? If the government cannot proof the quantity brought in, that man is not doing his job he should go. On the other hand how do government know there are sharp practices? It is because the volume quoted on paper by the suppliers is not same with the physical volume seeing. Isn't this enough ground to prosecute these criminals called the oil cabal? This is a classical criminal breach of trust and contract (the learned ones, please tell me I am right). So in the end, the government has no reason whatsoever to remove subsidy and leave these people to roam free. Not dealing with them appropriately is a clear signal that the government only makes noise about fighting corruption, it is not fighting it. Also it shows how weak, ball-less and spineless the government is, shown by her fear to prosecute her own citizens. Most annoying is she has no nerve to even touch the lazy officials she pays to help her ensure the subsidy benefits the entire Nigerian populace when there is enough evidence they are not doing their job, and even conniving with the oil importers to defraud her.

2. When GSM came it was costly but due to competition it is now so cheap cattle rearers in the bush have it.

What nonsense talk! How can you compare fuel to GSM? How many Nigerians depend in one way or the other on telecommunication (GSM) for day to day survival? When GSM was costly, the poor masses could afford to patiently wait because it wasn't a necessity (and still isn't) and couldn't in anyway affect their daily lives no matter how much it was sold. But look at fuel; we must travel. Granted most commercial buses that travel long distances use diesel, but how about those short distance trips made by cars that run on fuel. In my village, we have only motorcycles and small cars that run on fuel. If the price of fuel goes up as a result of subsidy removal, the cost of transportation will definitely go up. There is no hospital in my village, so when one is sick, the cost of transportation alone will be enough to make the relatives shelf the idea of taking the sick person to the hospital. Besides we all know how the market people can use anything that affects the economy to hike prices, not minding whether it has a direct effect on the product they are selling. We are aware of upward reviews in price following every increase in the salary of civil servants. In fact, I have had an encounter with a trader who claimed the price of her garri has to go up because the dollar is now very costly. Can you beat that?

When this special aide was asked if subsidy removal will not lead to an increase in the cost of transportation he answered: how many vehicles used for transportation use fuel? He went ahead to say BRT buses don't use fuel, El Rufai buses don't use fuel, Ekene Dili Chukwu don't. He even asked rhetorically; how many of the so called masses living in Abuja use taxis (sic) and not El Rufai buses? So Nigeria revolves around Abuja and Abuja alone? No wonder when Boko Haram struck in Abuja, the security there was made water-tight, but the other states were left without adequate security resulting in a free reign for the group to give the nation a sallah gift in death of innocent and promising Nigerians in Yobe and Borno states. Mr Adviser, if you are not aware then be informed; if you have decided to forget then be reminded that, Nigeria is beyond Abuja. We have other towns and cities in Nigeria too; and it will interest you to note that some have a transportation system based purely on fuel. In Makurdi for instance, we have only small cars and 16 seater buses (in rare instances 18 seater) as the means of commuting with the town. The same goes for inter-town commuting. These run on fuel and not diesel. Fuel subsidy removal will double their fare, but I know you don't care because anything outside Abuja is not Nigeria.

3. He reacted to the sceptism that the money realised will go down the drain by echoing what all pro-subsidy removal prophets have been saying: credible and independent Nigerians will be appointed to manage the funds! Interesting but not in any way plausible. Let's look at the two words; credible and independent.

By saying credible Nigerians will be brought to manage the funds realised is an indicting statement on all serving and past leaders. The purposes for which the funds realised from the removal will be used for yearly budgetary allocations without anything tangible happening. If there has been no tangible improvement despite huge budgetary allocations it must mean the people saddled with the responsibility of implementing the budget are not credible.The question then is, why not bring in the credible people to manage the budget to give us results in the first instance to proof if you have more you will do more. Why must you remove fuel subsidy to give them to manage? But I suppose these credible Nigerians were taught how to manage proceeds from subsidy removal only so they wouldn't be able to manage money from other sources. If you are not able to bring credible people to manange what you have now for you and the nation, I doubt if when you have the subsidy money you will get them to manage it.

Independent: does that word sound familiar? We have an independent judiciary; is it independent? The legislature is supposed to be independent, is it? Worst of all, we have INDEPENDENT National Electoral Commission (INEC), how independent is it? Go fool someone else! It is not by saying a body is Independent that makes it independent.These credible men and women will be appointed and paid. Who will do this? If your answer is the executive, then let's forget about independence. It is not just in the character of the Nigerian government to have independent agencies.
The local governments depend on the states which in turn depend on the federal government. Where is the independence? Even though we are continually told these are different levels (tiers) of government.

4. When he was questioned on what the money from the subsidy will do, Mr Adviser said the money is very small, so it won't be changing our lives overnight. Wait a minute! Either this man isn't part of this government or I didn't hear him right. Oga Presido is saying to continue with subsidy will cripple the economy, but here is his aide saying the money is small. Is Nigeria so broke that spending that small amount yearly will cripple the economy? Please tell me something better. This one is too fake. I see this as a pre-emptive move. When the so called subsidy is gone and the development it was to be put to is not seeing, it will be easily explained that the money wasn't that big, so it must accumulate for you to see the changes. I don't buy it. No way!

5. Refineries are not working and the government is not talking of making them work. The government's reason is that the turn around maintenance have become a drain pipe. Incredible! Why can't the government plug that pipe so that the refineries work? Better still, arrest and prosecute those who were awarded the turn around maintenance contracts that got the money but didn't deliver. Is the government afraid of its own citizens? Besides, I don't agree with the argument that government can't run businesses. Shenzhen Zhijun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd in China is owned by the Chinese government. This company has grown to a point it manufactures pharmaceuticals on behalf of several companies across the globe. What's more, it is the only Chinese pharmaceutical company with EU certification for cephalosporin antibiotics manufacture. There are several other government owned companies that are growing giving proof that it is not the involvement of government in business that is the problem, but the way it is run. It is the manner the individuals saddled with the responsibility of managing these government companies that ruin them. Government on her part shows no interest in bringing to book those individuals that run her companies aground.

I am yet to hear one, just one good reason why the subsidy has to go. All I have heard is so disappointing I have lost confidence in this government's ability to change for the better the life of the citizenry.

The government has no reason whatsoever to withdraw subsidy. Remove subsidy for what?

Monday, 5 December 2011

As The Church Slept… (8)

Leadership Editors's picture
Wed, 10/08/2011 - | SHARON FALLYA CHAM
President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan
So these are the structures the PDP has been using to “win” elections – diluted integrity? I use to think that the structures a political party should use for winning elections are roads, electricity, jobs, water supply, healthcare, medicare, transportation, good salaries, education and security,
I didn’t know that the global standards have changed and that the new structures are a gang of party thugs ready for a dime to snatch ballot papers and boxes and to kill if need be, a gang of criminals wearing clean clothes masquerading as party officials and loads of cash originally meant for public works and services. Well, the General can rest assured that even his detractors know that he has unimpeachable character, which the people want. But the corrupt elite and the beneficiaries of corruption have deployed the entire arsenal at their disposal, including co-opting uninformed clergy whom they know the people revere to abuse the minds of the voters against him. The General can rest knowing that no one in Nigeria can point a finger at him and say “you are a thief”, whereas the criminals in power cannot have this singular honour. Even their supporters know they are thieves.
Somehow, I think deep down among the PDP elite circle they know, and will not admit publicly, that those youth corps members gruesomely murdered were murdered because of them, hence the guilt-driven gift of five million Naira to each of their surviving families. Otherwise, youth corps members have been killed in national service before, why was such gesture not done to them before?
And come to think of it; a life is a life, so what happens to the several other victims of the violence? It is even more irritating and annoying that the thieving PDP seemed to have benefitted even more from the riots, because several of their corrupt governors that were set to lose the gubernatorial elections capitalised on the curfew they imposed with glee to snatch, stuff and rig the ballot because the voters could no longer monitor and protect their votes. A case of eating your cake and having it! Well, a wise man said somewhere that you can only keep a man down only if you are sure he will not rise again. The PDP’s mischief will crystallise into their final consumption by the inferno they have stoked all over the country. That is why I find these so cheap for hire funny characters like Yunana
Shibkau and his newly created and equally so cheap for hire organisation who are calling for the arrest of General Buhari and even calling for the deregistration of the General’s party, the CPC on the laughable claim that the party is a terrorist organisation as people lacking in sound values and can be conveniently described as, morally bankrupt and therefore shameless. Pray, if any organisation in Nigeria qualifies to be called a terror organisation in reference to Shibkau’s context is there any one that will snatch that inglorious name or title from the PDP? Who are the politicians that have been importing arms since 2003 to rig elections? Who are the politicians that have been recruiting our able bodied youth to be party thugs since before 2003 elections? Who are the politicians that have been murdering political opponents since before 2003 elections? Who are the politicians that have been stealing the nation’s wealth since 1999?
Who are the politicians that created the national monster called, the Niger Delta militants? Who are the politicians that officially migrated a hitherto street and motor park phrase, “do–or–die” into our political lexicon and way of life? In case he and his ilk don’t know let me quote a part of the post 2011 elections report of the Human Rights Watch: “… Human Rights Watch documented how ruling party politicians in the oil-rich Niger Delta mobilised and funded armed groups to help rig elections. That led to a sustained increase in violence and criminality in the region.”
So, between the CPC which is just a little over one year old and the PDP, which one of them is the terrorist organisation, considering this available evidence by the Human Rights Watch? By this evidence, all the kidnappings, oil bunkering, armed robberies and all other crimes that got their roots from the Niger Delta and which have spread like wild fire to other parts of the country are the handcraft of the PDP. So, shouldn’t the PDP be reported to the United Nations and World Criminal Court of Justice at The Hague for corrupting and criminalising our country?
That’s why I find it strange that the Church should be found supporting any one in the PDP. Is President Goodluck Jonathan not among the PDP elite in the Niger Delta indicted by this Human Rights Watch report? Could he have come this far without being part and parcel of them?
Greed, selfishness, lack of compassion and lack of sense of sacrifice and justice have polarised the nation now as evidenced by the aftermath of the presidential elections. Before the death of President Yar’Adua there was some relative peace and national unity, but all that have been frittered away by opportunism.
There are screaming voices from southern Nigeria, including some Christian clergy for the review or the scrapping of the NYSC scheme, a subtle way of asking southerners to avoid the north. And what about the Churches in the north, mostly attended by southerners doing business or working for federal agencies?
Do we review their existence in the north also? If yes, then what happens to evangelism? So, who bails the nation out of this? Who will unite the nation for national peace and harmony? Evidently, President Jonathan cannot, for the north, excluding his fans in the middle belt, views him with contempt. The traditional rulers in the north have lost credibility; therefore they cannot be a uniting force. You cannot even try it with any PDP big wig in the north for obvious reasons. So, who then?
The only group that can successfully unite this nation and make it work now is the Church. Yes, the Church. The Church has taken sides in the cantankerous elections, which makes her an interested party but she has what it takes to restore the peace and unity of the nation. How? By simply making sure there is accountability and integrity in governance in Nigeria, for when the Church is seen, not just heard, taking steps and making sure governance works to the benefit of the majority and not a few the Church will not only recover her public prestige before men but also before God.
A simple case of turning the Salt which has lost its savour from good for nothing to good for something, and then the Lord, the Owner of the Salt will cause her not to be trodden under foot of men. Dr. Francis Bola Akin-John, the founder and president of Church Growth Ministries International and the International Centre for Church Health, Lagos in an interview published on page 40 of The Nation newspaper of Saturday, April 30, 2011 said, “The Church should stand for the oppressed and pray for leaders.
If there is failure in government and there is also failure of the Church, we are finished as a nation.” This is scary – the possibility of government and the Church failing at the same time. But we have been having failed governments for a long time, and this is why the Church cannot afford to fail. She must step up to the plate to ensure governments do not fail; to make sure governments provide high quality services to the public.
God buttressed this mandate thus: “Son of man, I have made thee a watchman unto the house of Israel: therefore hear the word at my mouth, and give them warning from me.” Ezekiel 3:17. This is a prophetic call to accountability given the Church, which the Church must not fail in. Remember, “For the time is come that judgement must begin at the house of God…..” The only hope or remedy out of the fierce judgement of God is for the Church to restore her mandate, which is ensuring accountability in the society. And what a perfect way to start, she can start with the Goodluck Jonathan government which is her baby. And here is how:
1. On the eve of the presidential election there were media reports that President Goodluck Jonathan spent N250 billion to influence the election his way. This sum excludes the N100 million per day, which Prof. Pat Utomi alleged that the president spent per day during his campaign tour. The President has not denied these allegations up till now. The electoral law requests that presidential aspirants or candidates are not expected to spend more than N1 billion in campaigns. Therefore the Church leadership should demand the President and all other presidential candidates and gubernatorial candidates to disclose to the public how much they spent, and what were the sources of their funding. The Church must not relent on this, even if it means calling on the entire congregation on the streets.
 
2. Where anyone of the candidates has been found wanting in breach of the electoral finance law the Church should ensure such a one
is dealt with as the law requires.
3. The Church should send a bill to the National Assembly requesting for the removal of the immunity clause from our constitution. This clause has not helped Nigeria and Nigerians one bit, rather it has been serially abused and used to steal public funds massively.
We have seen recently how a serving governor was arrested in the U.S.A. for committing a crime. President Jonathan will not and cannot canvass for the removal of this clause; it was never in his campaign promises, for it has helped him and his party to plunder this nation. Rather it was General Buhari and the other candidates that have made it one of their priorities. So, the Church must vigorously pursue this as a goal even if it means marching on the streets for days, weeks and months non-stop.
4. The Church should actively canvass for a law that will make it a crime against the three tiers of government for any village, town or city to be found without well asphalted roads, pipe borne water, electricity, well equipped hospitals, schools and sanitary facilities.
5. The Church should also actively canvass for the removal of the privilege of Governors and Presidents enjoying unaccountable funds called “security vote”, with such funds channeled to the budget of security agencies, since they are the bodies saddled with security of lives and property.
6. The Church should march massively and severally non-stop to the National Assembly demanding them to revert to the genuine salaries and allowances lawfully prescribed them by the Revenue Mobilization and Fiscal Commission, demand the abolition of them doing or collecting funds for “constituency projects” which is clearly the job of the executive arm and to also demand a drastic cut in the budget of the parliament, for even with their hefty allowances they have turned their “oversight functions” into money spinners for themselves, otherwise why are the very places they do “oversight” on full of corruption and other sharp practices?
7. The Church should canvass for the adequate funding of the education sector in both the federal and states level.
8. The Church should canvass for the institutionalization of a social service welfare scheme where the aged and the jobless can be catered for.
9. Finally, the Church must continue to exert her influence in demanding accountability and good governance irrespective of who is in government.
 
The Church can do all of the above and more by engaging the services of the abundant lawyers in her midst and her members in the parliament. That way the Church will be reckoned with, and any government or a part of it or any agency that wants to misbehave will reckon that the Church will come after her. This is where and how the Church will have dominion and real power over the affairs of the nation, but not in merely endorsing questionable politicians.
In engaging government to be accountable the Church must expect reactionary forces and the beneficiaries of corruption to begin to say the usual nonsense like, “the Church should leave politics alone”, “the Clergy have no business with governance”, “there should be a separation of the State and religion”, blah, blah, blah. But we know this is false. Religion is best placed to serve the purpose of regulation and moderation of human conduct.
A nation with active religious presence and influence is well placed to avoid being a banana republic, which Nigeria seems headed to, and we cannot afford to be a banana republic. A wise man, Peter Kay said humorously of such a republic that, “You never know where to look when eating a banana.”
I know the Church can force a positive turn around for our nation for one reason. In the heat of the rage over the killing of the ten youth service corps members in Bauchi, the Bishop, Diocese of Lagos West Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion), Dr. Peter Awelewa Adebiyi was reported on page 55 of the Nation newspaper of Friday, May 13, 2011 in a story captioned Bishop threatens showdown on NYSC reform and written by Dada Aladelokun (Assistant Editor) saying, “We will continue to harp on it and I enjoin every member of this Church and all well-meaning Nigerians to support us in this crusade. And I make bold to say that if the government will not heed our call,
I will lead this congregation on a march on the National Assembly. We can no longer condone this wanton killing of our future leaders.” The Bishop was making a case for the review of the N.Y.S.C. scheme where possibly graduates could be posted to their states or regions to serve.
But what struck me was the realization that the clergy knew they could bring out their congregation to march on the street or march on any arm of government to demand for change and yet, all this while that government upon government were serially raping and plundering our resources they kept mute. Don’t tell me that they have been speaking to rulers privately, for the Bible says in Proverbs 27:5 that “Open rebuke is better than secret love.” I was excited that at least the Church has jerked back to life and to her calling. So, let us move on.
In the thick of the dilly dally by the National Assembly and late President Yar’Adua’s cabinet last year over whether to pass a resolution declaring the then sick President incapacitated in order to make way for then Vice President Goodluck Jonathan to become Acting President, Pastor Mrs. Sarah Amakwu, Senior Pastor, Family Worship Centre, Abuja pulled her Church congregation to join the march organized by the Save Nigeria Group led by Pastor Tunde Bakare, Mr. Femi Falana (SAN), Mrs. Naja’atu Mohammed, Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, Prof. Wole Soyinka and other leaders of Civil Society Organizations calling on the National Assembly and the cabinet to declare the sick President incapacitated.
The unrelenting pressure they mounted caused the dithering Senate to do the right thing, and Vice President Goodluck Jonathan was declared Acting President. I have observed with amusement how shady politicians and some media people are now attributing that feat to Senate President David Mark in order for him to retain the senate presidency, conveniently forgetting that he led the most over paid, underperforming and most corrupt parliament in the world.
The same pressure was exerted by the same individuals and organizations to compel an also dithering President Goodluck Jonathan to send Prof. Maurice Iwu to an inglorious retirement, for it seemed he and his party were intent on retaining Prof. Iwu’s injurious services which had served them well at the expense of the nation. The same pressure by the same persons and groups caused government to look outside some suggested questionable characters that were being bandied about as possible replacement for Prof. Iwu. President Jonathan is now being cleverly credited with that feat also; in fact it was part of his campaigns songs. As time flies, if you are not careful, it will carry your memory along its wings into mental recession. That’s my quote.
 
The point here is the Church can take the lead in organizing marches, walks or sit-ins against cases of injustice, corruption and sit-tight rulers. Great man of God, Pastor Enoch Adeboye, the G.O. of the Redeemed Christian Church of God was widely reported last year to have said he will lead his Church in protest if the 2011 elections were fraudulent.
This is commendable. The presidential elections, and even the other elections could not be said to have been fair; the rigging commenced when the ruling party rigged out a zone that was supposed to produce the candidate for the election, and the rigging continued up to the presidential primaries where delegates had their status changed to dollargates, and it went through to the general elections where money and incumbency proved decisive.
This much was also testified by Rev. Moses Iloh, the Shepherd-in-charge of Soul-Winning Ministries, Lagos. The man of God was quoted by Gabriel Dike, a Sun newspaper reporter on page 13 of their Tuesday, May 17, 2011 edition in a story titled 2011 polls, most sophisticated electoral fraud – Rev Moses Iloh as saying, “the secret agendum was to ensure victory at all costs for Mr. President at the polls in the full consciousness that Nigeria parades the most disreputable, conscienceless and despicable judiciary when it comes to election tribunals…..there was no control limit placed on funds to be expended on the election campaign.
There was no question that it was government’s scarce funds that were irresponsibly wasted on campaign funding by the incumbents.” Earlier in the story the reporter said the man of God referred to the election as the most expensive, sophisticated, highly educated and well-mannered electoral fraud in the history of the country despite the determination of Nigerians to protect their votes.
On the consequence of the Church’s bias in the elections the man of God said, “The polity was violently raped and now pregnant with two dangerous bastards: religion and tribalism. When the pregnancy matured and these monsters are delivered, they will at birth, show up with 32 fully matured teeth.” Scary situation Nigeria has been walked into, you might agree.
Well, the protest marches as proposed by God’s servant Pastor Adeboye should not be limited to elections issues alone; it should be commenced and sustained for good governance. This is one of the ways in which the Spirit of the Church will be felt in society compelling positive change. It is this attitude that fuelled and is still fuelling the mass uprisings in almost all the Arab States, whose living standards are far beyond those of Nigerians.
Yet, they are determined to create a better society for themselves. Some Christians may be scoffing at them, even assuming that it could be a divine confusion set among them, but the Lord has a Word for them thus: “And the lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely: for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.” Luke 16:8. So, the children of light (the Church) watch idly and even endorse corrupt politicians to be plundering the resources of God and as they are plundering they will be praying for them in Church for “wisdom and divine guidance” while others elsewhere are determined that such plunder cannot be. So, who is wiser? That Scripture has given the answer clearly.
The Church must rise up to her calling of societal accountability, so that thievery in government will stop, for no society can afford to have people with inherent inclination to stealing public funds as leaders because of the spiritual implication of this negative inclination: “….This is the curse that goeth forth over the face of the whole earth: for every one that stealeth shall be cut off…. I will bring it forth, saith the LORD of hosts, and it shall enter into the house of the thief, and into the house of him that sweareth falsely by my name: and it shall remain in the midst of his house, and shall consume it with the timber thereof and the stones thereof.” Zechariah 5:3 & 4. So, the penalty for a thief and those who use God’s name fraudulently is shared with their household without exemption. Little wonder Nigeria has not been doing well in spite of prayers like, “O’ Lord, bless our leaders with wisdom and guide them.” If the Church leads the way in the fight against mis-governance she would of course be joined by the rest of society, bringing healing and unity of purpose in the society and ultimately restoring the honour of the Church. Do I even have to say the Church will be feared by evil forces?
The book of Acts of the Apostles does not read Prayers of the Apostles. No, it showed the Apostles engaging in civil disobediences against what was wrong. While they were praying they were also acting. Good example of faith without works being dead. Nigeria must rank as the most praying nation in the world, but it should not stop there. There must be physical involvement. God will not come down in Person to remove evil from society, no. He works with us and through us. There should be no reason why Nigeria with plenty of Churches should not be better off than churchless nations like Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, China, Indonesia, etc.
The Lord Jesus Christ said a parable about the sleeping Church and the consequence thus: “…..The Kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field: But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way.” Matthew 13:24 & 25. So, as the Church slept, the devil came and sowed the tares of corruption, kidnappings, thefts, robberies and all manner of violence and evil, and Nigerians are in tears caused by these tares! As the Church slept, the devil anointed political leaders for the nation and masterfully, characteristically and deceptively presented them to the Church for their signature. This sleep should end!
Ironically, a Nigerian pastor, Sunday Adelaja was used mightily by God to bring a revolutionary change in Ukraine in 2005 by pulling out his large congregation unto the streets of the capital, Kiev. He detailed his story in his book CHURCH SHIFT. In Nigeria, we have pastors that pull large crowds in miracle or healing conventions. The congregations revere them to the point of total adoration and submission. Can they now harness this gift to change this nation radically in order to escape God’s imminent judgement? It is called Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR. It is time.
    

As The Church Slept… (7)

Isah Ramat's picture
Tue, 09/08/2011 -  | SHARON FALIYA CHAM
This call was proved fruitful in Kano and Bauchi States in the heavily and violently rigged 2007 general elections. This is the reason the P.D.P. was jittery in the build up to the 2011 elections concerning this call and attempted to do all they could to stop the protection of votes, because they cannot win any free and fair elections even if they stoke religious sentiments like they always do, and therefore the P.D.P. and their supporters criticizing Buhari’s call for votes protection would rather we escort PDP thugs with cheers, claps, flowers, love songs and poems when they come snatching ballot boxes or when they are rewriting election results usually with active connivance of security forces who probably see themselves as the armed security wing of the PDP and making it worse is an unpredictable judiciary that could “arrest” certain judgments that seem not to favour the party. They had an elaborate scheme to secure 25 per cent of the presidential election votes in states they considered to be General Buhari’s strongholds. In their flawed analysis or thinking they thought outright rigging was going to bring violence because of the evident determination of the people not to have a repeat of the 2007 farce called elections, more so they know very well that the teeming masses respect and listen to General Buhari more than them, hence the resort to padding the votes to generate the much sought 25 per cent. But they failed to consider one thing, that is, if General Buhari was so unpopular in any of the south-south or south-east states such that he could win only about 5, 000 votes in one state how popular was Goodluck Jonathan in Buhari’s strongholds for him to win hundreds of thousands of votes in, say Kano for example or Sokoto, more so considering the seething anger and frustration over Goodluck Jonathan’s usurpation of the rightful turn of the north to contest the election in his party. In this context, was it logical that the mass of northern voters would love Goodluck Jonathan more than his southern voters or supporters would love General Buhari? Or is it a case of the new definition of national unity now gaining ground, that at a political party convention southern delegates are entitled to give their bloc vote to a southern presidential aspirant contesting against a northern aspirant with northern delegates expected to do same and those northern delegates or states that did not toe that pattern labeled as not believing in national unity? The same attitude was expected and exhibited in the general presidential election. All of a sudden it is conveniently being forgotten that the north overwhelmingly dumped their own, Alhaji Othman Bashir Tofa for Chief M.K.O. Abiola in the 1993 elections and massively repeated the same for General Obasanjo in 1999. Some commentators are now labeling the north that voted Buhari as anti unity or as sectionalists. Are historical voting records, which will showcase who the real sectionalists and tribalists are, missing even before rapture? Therefore without doubt, the responsibility of the post-election violence should be and must be placed on the shoulders of the P.D.P. They raised a very large army of unemployed, frustrated and angry youth through their corrupt practices and then capped it by dishonestly resolving their zoning brouhaha and then wanted 25 per cent from the region cheated why wouldn’t there be such backlash.
So, you see clearly that General Buhari became a victim of the backfiring of the PDP’s long term mischief. The national youth corps members that were killed were also victims of this mischief. In the elections preceding the presidential vote there were media reports of youth corps members working as ad-hoc staff caught aiding and abetting vote rigging in favour of the PDP in most northern states, then came the presidential vote and its complications. Complications because southern and Church going national youth service corps members working as INEC ad-hoc staff got caught in the web of corrupt and thieving P.D.P. governors who were determined to secure 25 per cent of the votes for a desperate southern presidential candidate of the thieving party, and these ad-hoc staff probably heard in Church to “vote according to faith”, and so, what coincidence! They became victims of this notorious coincidence. I have heard people say why did the riots break out in places the General won, and why did the riots start even before the final result tally was made. It all boils down to this 25 per cent stuff. Reports were of course filtering in that General Buhari was winning mere 5, 000 votes in southern states, the vote tally expressing how much they love him as a Muslim Hausa/Fulani northerner and then here was Goodluck Jonathan whom they had every reason to be angry with polling hundreds of thousands in their own domain. It just doesn’t add up. Whatever factor they thought made Goodluck Jonathan very popular in the south and correspondingly made General Buhari unpopular there could also be the same factor that made General Buhari popular in the north and correspondingly made Goodluck Jonathan unpopular there, except of course, I know that, that factor cannot be anti-corruption or patriotism, for on these the General stood and still stands in good stead. In the case of Goodluck Jonathan, logically speaking, he stood and still stands more unpopular in the north for cheating them of their rightful turn at the presidency. I have read suggestions from hitherto reasonable analysts and columnists suggesting that General Buhari couldn’t have expected to win the elections because he had no structures in the south. For example, Eddy Odivwri who writes for This Day newspaper, in his column (polscope) on page 56 of their edition of Saturday, April 30, 2011 titled, Buhari: If the Truth Be Told said, “Buhari is popular in the north, not in the south. Yet, he made no effort to specially court the south. He took the south for granted…” Somewhere in the same article he contradicted this claim by saying, “The widespread acceptance of Buhari’s nascent Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) should have even gladdened him, rather than give him a false status of a political conquistador. Here was a political party that is less than 20 months old. And within such a short time had had such flaming spread across the country, with a good following.
” Did you notice the sudden transition? From “not popular in the south” to “flaming spread across the country, with a good following” and “widespread acceptance.” This gave me more evidence that sentiments rather than capability was whipped up by the PDP in collaboration with some Christian clergy to defeat the General. On the Hausa service of the Voice of America broadcast at 6am on Wednesday, May 11, 2011, Hon. Usman Bugaje, the erstwhile National Secretary of the A.C.N. was asked why his party seemed to have delivered for the PDP in their strong hold, the south-west. He answered that President Goodluck Jonathan came and held several meetings with several groups in Lagos, and he consistently impressed on them that he was the only Christian and ethnic minority in the contest among the major contenders. This can be true; for the president had no selling point other than sentiments, including the false claim to niceness, meekness and humility as if these were not the uniform the devil wore to be able to deceive Eve in the Garden of Eden. Such a president! This is the “structures” his supporters and handlers are trumpeting he has nationwide and of which General Buhari doesn’t have. Eddy Odivwri again: “What is more, the rave of revolution supposedly sparked by Buhari derives strongly from his military portraiture as a no-nonsense man. He is generally believed to be a firm, honest, and disciplined man. Yes! But anyone who will lead such a complex country like Nigeria, will require far more than these threesome virtues. Under a democracy, most of the tough image associated with Buhari would have been weakened or diluted.” Can you imagine that? Mr. Eddy Odivwri conceded that the General is generally considered to be a man of integrity, but that the sum of the virtues that make integrity are not enough, that he should have weakened or diluted his character because of democracy, meaning he should have been a little bit of a thief, a little bit of a liar, a little bit of a womanizer, a little bit of a drunk, a little bit of a disco freak, a little bit of D’Banj interviews, a little bit of a homosexual, a little bit of a ritualist, a little bit an occult and a little bit corrupt to gain acceptance. Was this what the clergy wanted? Was this the requirement to win in the south? Was this the much vaunted structures Buhari was and is being lampooned of not having nationwide? 

As The Church Slept… (6)

Isah Ramat's picture
Mon, 08/08/2011.| SHARON FALIYA CHAM
The Nation newspaper, on page 19 of their Wednesday, May 18, 2011 second editorial captioned A cleric’s inconsistency, lamented the curious relationship between some Christian clergy (The Right Rev. Olusina Fape) and the P.D.P. thus: “We would have been at ease to place where the cleric truly belongs, except that he is inconsistent. And that is a big problem with many of our clerics; they seem to be talking from both sides of their mouths. Clerics ought not to be praise- singers but, as representatives of God on earth, they should tell the truth whatever the situation, and damn the consequence. They need not be fair-weather friends.” Hmmmm…, I shiver and I shudder. The clergy are being watched, and the purpose of their calling is being reminded them by a newspaper! If the P.D.P., the institution of plunder, roguery and savagery is the ID of the Church then one can only exclaim, “Lord have mercy!” Sure, the huge marketing trick worked as lots of people, mostly Christians, said after the elections, “I voted for Goodluck Jonathan and not the party, the PDP”, and you just sigh in wonderment, thinking how possible it was to distinguish between the party and her candidate. It was as if the candidate just emerged from the moon without testimony of involvement in the series of the party’s malfeasance of which he was deeply involved as deputy governor, governor, vice president, acting president and then as President. It was and is still the dumbest statement I have ever heard. These gods of Janus certainly can market almost anything unmarketable under the sun. Dr. Okey Ndibe, a Columnist with the Daily Sun newspaper, marveled at this development in his article, For Jonathan, Obasanjo as parable, on page 55 of the edition of Tuesday, May 3, 2011.
He wrote: “One of the bizarre developments in the presidential election was the refrain by many voters that they chose Mr. Jonathan despite their grave misgivings about his People’s Democratic Party (PDP). That sentiment is curious precisely because Mr. Jonathan’s political career, in style and substance, stipulates that here’s a man who, by conviction and temperament, is wedded to the PDP.” This is true; you cannot separate Mr. Jonathan from the PDP. I have heard people say he struck them as a nice guy, someone different from the style of the party, but they should have known, had it been they cared to mine the archive of information, that he couldn’t have risen through to the top without him being an active participant in the party’s putrid way of doing things. It shocked me, because it sounded like someone just collected the mark of the beast, and when asked why he collected it justified it by saying he received it because the guy stamping the mark looked clean, decent and handsome. I blame this on the poor reading culture of Nigerians, particularly Christians. They seem content in just reading the Bible and inspirational books written by anointed men of God while hugely ignoring newspapers and news magazines, which will inform them of the character of the people governing them and the things happening in the society. In fact, such information will help the believer know the positive effect or otherwise of their prayer for the nation and will help in no small way in shaping their decision during election seasons. God’s lamentation in Hosea 4:6 that “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge” should not be mistaken to mean only Biblical knowledge; it includes the knowledge of and happenings in and around your environment. Investment in knowledge and information is not, and will never ever be a waste.
The biased involvement of the Church in these elections has left the nation disunited like never before. And the Church leadership, apparently having not realized that under them the Church has wavered from her salt of the nation calling with the attendant unpleasant consequence of the Church being trodden under foot of men have attempted to worsen an already worst case by calling for the arrest of the CPC presidential candidate, Gen. Buhari over the riots in parts of the north that greeted the presidential elections. They failed to realize that their publicized endorsement of Goodluck Jonathan to win the election, instead of demanding him to go and honour his party’s power sharing agreement engendered the riots, with Churches burnt and Christians killed. Why? Because the Church was seen to be an accomplice in perpetrating injustice, the denial of the north’s rightful turn at the presidency, coming at the heels of the death of a northerner who barely spent a little over two years in that office in a potential eight year turn. In fact, immediately after the presidential election and after Goodluck Jonathan was declared “winner”, his handlers resorted to blackmailing the nation by serially publishing in various news media the photograph of Goodluck Jonathan kneeling down and being prayed for by Pastor E.A. Adeboye, typically expressing their usual mantra, “God gives power to whomsoever He wishes.” The Church became afflicted with Compassion Deficiency Disease (CDD) just like most of the politicians in Nigeria, apologies to Chi-Chi Okonjo (back page of This day newspaper, Thursday, April 21, 2011.) It was Pope Paul VI (1897 – 1978) who said, “If you want peace, work for justice.” Yes, justice breeds peace. I have read some puerile arguments like, why did the north not break out in riots after the heavily rigged 2007 presidential election. The answer is, based on the power sharing deal a northerner “won” the heavily flawed poll. It didn’t matter whether it was Buhari or Yar’Adua that won, the issue at stake then was, yes, the deal was “respected”, a northerner was “elected”. There was a sense of justice among them, no matter whether the justice was a flawed one considering the blatantly rigged election.
That is why CAN has lost the moral right to call for the arrest of Gen. Buhari, for they have taken sides with the PDP and therefore have become, wittingly or not, the spokespersons of the party. Calling for his arrest suggests the PDP, on whose behalf CAN was making the call for, has conducted an investigation and found the General and his party culpable, and therefore also suggests there was no need again for President Jonathan to commission the Panel of Inquiry he inaugurated to investigate the usual “immediate and remote” causes of the violence.
True, there were pictures of the rampaging youth displaying posters of the General, but it should be seen in the context of him being seen by the pitiable and frustrated youth in the north as the symbol, or more appropriately the agent that will bring positive change to their lives. Those youth were and are obviously tired of the uninspiring and condemned life the corrupt elite in Nigeria have subjected them to over the years, and they have an inner knowing that their lives could be better if compassionate and purposeful leadership had been in place. This should be understood in the context that God created each person with a sense of self dignity and honour, and so there will always be that drive to break out of any wall or barrier that tends to stifle the projection of one’s dignity and honour, which is what corrupt leaders have always been – barriers and walls against the common good. History has revealed that all successful revolutions, including the new ones sweeping through the Middle East now, have always been fought on the quest against such barriers that stood against the promotion of human dignity and honour.
The poor man in Nigeria knows very well that part of the reasons for his poverty is corruption, which has become the way of life of the ruling elite. So, in spite of the observed subservience and obeisance which the poor treat the wealthy there’s always a suppressed tinge of envy and anger and frustration patiently waiting for a catalyst to burst forth. They always look out for an inspiration – something that will crystallize them into liberating themselves – a leader they can identify with and can trust. This is the context in which General Buhari is seen by the poor and the well informed, decent, honourable and truthful middle class and the few honest and truth loving wealthy people. They see him remarkably different from the other elite all around them who, even after a short spell in the corridors of power, have amassed sudden and questionable wealth, knowing that the General has been a military governor, a G.O.C., a petroleum minister, a military head of state and chaired the P.T.F. with his integrity intact. When rounding up his presidential campaign on 13th April 2011 he said this: “I have had the fortune and privilege of managing national resources in various capacities – as a military commander, as a state governor, as a minister, as head of the Petroleum Trust Fund, and as the head of state of this great country. And in all that I have been and done, I have never touched a kobo of public funds.
“I say this without pride and with all sense of responsibility and humility; but I challenge anyone in the race for the leadership of this country then or now to dare make the same claim.” It was a challenge that went unanswered. And that challenge is still echoing in Nigeria’s air space and landscape, and will continue to echo until Nigerians opt to free themselves from the vice grip of vagabonds in power. It is this desire to break out from penury imposed by corruption that caused the teeming mass in the north to heed General Buhari’s popular call, “a katsa, a tsare, a raka, a fada”, meaning, vote, protect your vote, escort your vote until it is announced. This is sound voter education. If you are a decent politician like Buhari and you are politicking in a notoriously corrupt country like Nigeria, where the ruling or ruining party has violated and polluted every means of lawful advancement of justice, including the security forces and the judiciary, and because of your avowed commitment to stick to your integrity you have no option than to be revolutionary by calling on oppressed voters to protect their votes and make sure they count. Is this not the same type of call that liberated most nations from oppressive colonialists? If the Jews had not heeded Moses’ revolutionary call to defy Pharaoh’s oppression and leave they would have remained in bondage. This call was proved fruitful in Kano and Bauchi States in the heavily and violently rigged 2007 general elections. This is the reason the P.D.P. was jittery in the build up to the 2011 elections concerning this call and attempted to do all they could to stop the protection of votes, because they cannot win any free and fair elections even if they stoke religious sentiments like they always do, and therefore the P.D.P. and their supporters criticizing Buhari’s call for votes protection would rather we escort P.D.P. thugs with cheers, claps, flowers, love songs and poems when they come snatching ballot boxes or when they are rewriting election results usually with active connivance of security forces who probably see themselves as the armed security wing of the P.D.P., and making it worse is an unpredictable judiciary that could “arrest” certain judgments that seem not to favour the party. They had an elaborate scheme to secure 25% of the presidential election votes in states they considered to be General Buhari’s strongholds. In their flawed analysis or thinking they thought outright rigging was going to bring violence because of the evident determination of the people not to have a repeat of the 2007 farce called elections, more so they know very well that the teeming masses respect and listen to General Buhari more than them, hence the resort to padding the votes to generate the much sought 25%. But they failed to consider one thing, that is, if General Buhari was so unpopular in any of the south-south or south-east states such that he could win only about 5, 000 votes in one state how popular was Goodluck Jonathan in Buhari’s strongholds for him to win hundreds of thousands of votes in, say Kano for example or Sokoto, more so considering the seething anger and frustration over Goodluck Jonathan’s usurpation of the rightful turn of the north to contest the election in his party. In this context, was it logical that the mass of northern voters would love Goodluck Jonathan more than his southern voters or supporters would love General Buhari? Or is it a case of the new definition of national unity now gaining ground, that at a political party convention southern delegates are entitled to give their bloc vote to a southern presidential aspirant contesting against a northern aspirant with northern delegates expected to do same and those northern delegates or states that did not toe that pattern labeled as not believing in national unity? The same attitude was expected and exhibited in the general presidential election. All of a sudden it is conveniently being forgotten that the north overwhelmingly dumped their own, Alhaji Othman Bashir Tofa for Chief M.K.O. Abiola in the 1993 elections and massively repeated the same for General Obasanjo in 1999. Some commentators are now labeling the north that voted Buhari as anti unity or as sectionalists. Are historical voting records, which will showcase who the real sectionalists and tribalists are, missing even before rapture? Therefore without doubt, the responsibility of the post-election violence should be and must be placed on the shoulders of the P.D.P. They raised a very large army of unemployed, frustrated and angry youth through their corrupt practices and then capped it by dishonestly resolving their zoning brouhaha and then wanted 25% from the region cheated why wouldn’t there be such backlash.
So, you see clearly General Buhari became a victim of the backfiring of the P.D.P.’s long term mischief. The national youth corps members that were killed were also victims of this mischief. In the elections preceding the presidential vote there were media reports of youth corps members working as ad-hoc staff caught aiding and abetting vote rigging in favour of the P.D.P. in most northern states, then came the presidential vote and its complications. Complications because southern and Church going national youth service corps members working as INEC ad-hoc staff got caught in the web of corrupt and thieving P.D.P. governors who were determined to secure 25% of the votes for a desperate southern presidential candidate of the thieving party, and these ad-hoc staff probably heard in Church to “vote according to faith”, and so, what coincidence! They became victims of this notorious coincidence. I have heard people say why did the riots break out in places the General won, and why did the riots start even before the final result tally was made. It all boils down to this 25% stuff. Reports were of course filtering in that General Buhari was winning mere 5, 000 votes in southern states, the vote tally expressing how much they love him as a Muslim Hausa/Fulani northerner and then here was Goodluck Jonathan whom they had every reason to be angry with polling hundreds of thousands in their own domain. It just doesn’t add up. Whatever factor they thought made Goodluck Jonathan very popular in the south and correspondingly made General Buhari unpopular there could also be the same factor that made General Buhari popular in the north and correspondingly made Goodluck Jonathan unpopular there, except of course, I know that, that factor cannot be anti-corruption or patriotism, for on these the General stood and still stands in good stead. In the case of Goodluck Jonathan, logically speaking, he stood and still stands more unpopular in the north for cheating them of their rightful turn at the presidency. I have read suggestions from hitherto reasonable analysts and columnists suggesting that General Buhari couldn’t have expected to win the elections because he had no structures in the south. For example, Eddy Odivwri who writes for This Day newspaper, in his column (polscope) on page 56 of their edition of Saturday, April 30, 2011 titled, Buhari: If the Truth Be Told said, “Buhari is popular in the north, not in the south. Yet, he made no effort to specially court the south. He took the south for granted…” Somewhere in the same article he contradicted this claim by saying, “The widespread acceptance of Buhari’s nascent Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) should have even gladdened him, rather than give him a false status of a political conquistador. Here was a political party that is less than 20 months old. And within such a short time had had such flaming spread across the country, with a good following.” Did you notice the sudden transition? From “not popular in the south” to “flaming spread across the country, with a good following” and “widespread acceptance.” This gave me more evidence that sentiments rather than capability was whipped up by the P.D.P. in collaboration with some Christian clergy to defeat the General. On the Hausa service of the Voice of America broadcast at 6am on Wednesday, May 11, 2011, Hon. Usman Bugaje, the erstwhile National Secretary of the A.C.N. was asked why his party seemed to have delivered for the P.D.P. in their strong hold, the south-west. He answered that President Goodluck Jonathan came and held several meetings with several groups in Lagos, and he consistently impressed on them that he was the only Christian and ethnic minority in the contest among the major contenders. This can be true; for the president had no selling point other than sentiments, including the false claim to niceness, meekness and humility as if these were not the uniform the devil wore to be able to deceive Eve in the Garden of Eden. Such a president! This is the “structures” his supporters and handlers are trumpeting he has nationwide and of which General Buhari doesn’t have. Eddy Odivwri again: “What is more, the rave of revolution supposedly sparked by Buhari derives strongly from his military portraiture as a no-nonsense man. He is generally believed to be a firm, honest, and disciplined man. Yes! But anyone who will lead such a complex country like Nigeria, will require far more than these threesome virtues. Under a democracy, most of the tough image associated with Buhari would have been weakened or diluted.” Can you imagine that? Mr. Eddy Odivwri conceded that the General is generally considered to be a man of integrity, but that the sum of the virtues that make integrity are not enough, that he should have weakened or diluted his character because of democracy, meaning he should have been a little bit of a thief, a little bit of a liar, a little bit of a womanizer, a little bit of a drunk, a little bit of a disco freak, a little bit of D’Banj interviews, a little bit of a homosexual, a little bit of a ritualist, a little bit an occult and a little bit corrupt to gain acceptance. Was this what the clergy wanted? Was this the requirement to win in the south? Was this the much vaunted structures Buhari was and is being lampooned of not having nationwide? So these are the structures the P.D.P. has been using to “win” elections – diluted integrity? I use to think that the structures a political party should use for winning elections are roads, electricity, jobs, water supply, healthcare, medicare, transportation, good salaries, education and security, I didn’t know that the global standards have changed and that the new structures are a gang of party thugs ready for a dime to snatch ballot papers and boxes and to kill if need be, a gang of criminals wearing clean clothes masquerading as party officials and loads of cash originally meant for public works and services. Well, the General can rest assured that even his detractors know that he has unimpeachable character, which the people want. But the corrupt elite and the beneficiaries of corruption have deployed the entire arsenal at their disposal, including co-opting uninformed clergy whom they know the people revere to abuse the minds of the voters against him. The General can rest knowing that no one in Nigeria can point a finger at him and say “you are a thief”, whereas the criminals in power cannot have this singular honour. Even their supporters know they are thieves.
Somehow, I think deep down among the P.D.P. elite circle they know, and will not admit publicly, that those youth corps members gruesomely murdered were murdered because of them, hence the guilt-driven gift of five million Naira to each of their surviving families. Otherwise, youth corps members have been killed in national service before, why was such gesture not done to them before? And come to think of it; a life is a life, so what happens to the several other victims of the violence? It is even more irritating and annoying that the thieving P.D.P. seemed to have benefitted even more from the riots, because several of their corrupt governors that were set to lose the gubernatorial elections capitalized on the curfew they imposed with glee to snatch, stuff and rig the ballot because the voters could no longer monitor and protect their votes. A case of eating your cake and having it! Well, a wise man said somewhere that you can only keep a man down only if you are sure he will not rise again. The P.D.P.’s mischief will crystallize into their final consumption by the inferno they have stoked all over the country. That is why I find these so cheap for hire funny characters like Yunana Shibkau and his newly created and equally so cheap for hire organization who are calling for the arrest of General Buhari and even calling for the deregistration of the General’s party, the C.P.C. on the laughable claim that the party is a terrorist organization as people lacking in sound values and can be conveniently described as, morally bankrupt and therefore shameless. Pray, if any organization in Nigeria qualifies to be called a terror organization in reference to Shibkau’s context is there any one that will snatch that inglorious name or title from the P.D.P.? Who are the politicians that have been importing arms since 2003 to rig elections? Who are the politicians that have been recruiting our able bodied youth to be party thugs since before 2003 elections? Who are the politicians that have been murdering political opponents since before 2003 elections? Who are the politicians that have been stealing the nation’s wealth since 1999? Who are the politicians that created the national monster called, the Niger Delta militants? Who are the politicians that officially migrated a hitherto street and motor park phrase, “do – or – die” into our political lexicon and way of life? In case he and his ilk don’t know let me quote a part of the post 2011 elections report of the Human Rights Watch: “… Human Rights Watch documented how ruling party politicians in the oil-rich Niger Delta mobilized and funded armed groups to help rig elections. That led to a sustained increase in violence and criminality in the region.” So, between the C.P.C. which is just a little over one year old and the P.D.P., which one of them is the terrorist organization, considering this available evidence by the Human Rights Watch? By this evidence, all the kidnappings, oil bunkering, armed robberies and all other crimes that got their roots from the Niger Delta and which have spread like wild fire to other parts of the country are the handcraft of the P.D.P. So, shouldn’t the P.D.P. be reported to the United Nations and World Criminal Court of Justice at The Hague for corrupting and criminalizing our country? That’s why I find it strange that the Church should be found supporting any one in the P.D.P. Is President Goodluck Jonathan not among the P.D.P. elite in the Niger Delta indicted by this Human Rights Watch report? Could he have come this far without being part and parcel of them?
Greed, selfishness, lack of compassion and lack of sense of sacrifice and justice have polarized the nation now as evidenced by the aftermath of the presidential elections. Before the death of President Yar’Adua there was some relative peace and national unity, but all that have been frittered away by opportunism. There are screaming voices from southern Nigeria, including some Christian clergy for the review or the scrapping of the N.Y.S.C. scheme, a subtle way of asking southerners to avoid the north. And what about the Churches in the north, mostly attended by southerners doing business or working for federal agencies? Do we review their existence in the north also? If yes, then what happens to evangelism? So, who bails the nation out of this? Who will unite the nation for national peace and harmony? Evidently, President Jonathan cannot, for the north, excluding his fans in the middle belt, views him with contempt. The traditional rulers in the north have lost credibility; therefore they cannot be a uniting force. You cannot even try it with any P.D.P. big wig in the north for obvious reasons. So, who then?
The only group that can successfully unite this nation and make it work now is the Church. Yes, the Church. The Church has taken sides in the cantankerous elections, which makes her an interested party but she has what it takes to restore the peace and unity of the nation. How? By simply making sure there is accountability and integrity in governance in Nigeria, for when the Church is seen, not just heard, taking steps and making sure governance works to the benefit of the majority and not a few the Church will not only recover her public prestige before men but also before God. A simple case of turning the Salt which has lost its savour from good for nothing to good for something, and then the Lord, the Owner of the Salt will cause her not to be trodden under foot of men. Dr. Francis Bola Akin-John, the founder and president of Church Growth Ministries International and the International Centre for Church Health, Lagos in an interview published on page 40 of the Nation newspaper of Saturday, April 30, 2011 said, “The Church should stand for the oppressed and pray for leaders. If there is failure in government and there is also failure of the Church, we are finished as a nation.” This is scary – the possibility of government and the Church failing at the same time. But we have been having failed governments for a long time, and this is why the Church cannot afford to fail. She must step up to the plate to ensure governments do not fail; to make sure governments provide high quality services to the public. God buttressed this mandate thus: “Son of man, I have made thee a watchman unto the house of Israel: therefore hear the word at my mouth, and give them warning from me.” Ezekiel 3:17. This is a prophetic call to accountability given the Church, which the Church must not fail in. Remember, “For the time is come that judgement must begin at the house of God…..” The only hope or remedy out of the fierce judgement of God is for the Church to restore her mandate, which is ensuring accountability in the society. And what a perfect way to start, she can start with the Goodluck Jonathan government which is her baby. And here is how:
1. On the eve of the presidential election there were media reports that President Goodluck Jonathan spent N250 billion to influence the election his way. This sum excludes the N100 million per day, which Prof. Pat Utomi alleged that the President spent per day during his campaign tour. The President has not denied these allegations up till now. The electoral law requests that presidential aspirants or candidates are not expected to spend more than N1 billion in campaigns. Therefore the Church leadership should demand the President and all other presidential candidates and gubernatorial candidates to disclose to the public how much they spent, and what were the sources of their funding. The Church must not relent on this, even if it means calling on the entire congregation on the streets.
2. Where anyone of the candidates has been found wanting in breach of the electoral finance law the Church should ensure such a one is dealt with as the law requires.
3. The Church should send a bill to the National Assembly requesting for the removal of the immunity clause from our constitution. This clause has not helped Nigeria and Nigerians one bit, rather it has been serially abused and used to steal public funds massively. We have seen recently how a serving governor was arrested in the U.S.A. for committing a crime. President Jonathan will not and cannot canvass for the removal of this clause; it was never in his campaign promises, for it has helped him and his party to plunder this nation. Rather it was General Buhari and the other candidates that have made it one of their priorities. So, the Church must vigorously pursue this as a goal even if it means marching on the streets for days, weeks and months non-stop.
4. The Church should actively canvass for a law that will make it a crime against the three tiers of government for any village, town or city to be found without well asphalted roads, pipe borne water, electricity, well equipped hospitals, schools and sanitary facilities.
5. The Church should also actively canvass for the removal of the privilege of Governors and Presidents enjoying unaccountable funds called “security vote”, with such funds channeled to the budget of security agencies, since they are the bodies saddled with security of lives and property.
6. The Church should march massively and severally non-stop to the National Assembly demanding them to revert to the genuine salaries and allowances lawfully prescribed them by the Revenue Mobilization and Fiscal Commission, demand the abolition of them doing or collecting funds for “constituency projects” which is clearly the job of the executive arm and to also demand a drastic cut in the budget of the parliament, for even with their hefty allowances they have turned their “oversight functions” into money spinners for themselves, otherwise why are the very places they do “oversight” on full of corruption and other sharp practices?
7. The Church should canvass for the adequate funding of the education sector in both the federal and states level.
8. The Church should canvass for the institutionalization of a social service welfare scheme where the aged and the jobless can be catered for.
9. Finally, the Church must continue to exert her influence in demanding accountability and good governance irrespective of who is in government.
The Church can do all of the above and more by engaging the services of the abundant lawyers in her midst and her members in the parliament. That way the Church will be reckoned with, and any government or a part of it or any agency that wants to misbehave will reckon that the Church will come after her. This is where and how the Church will have dominion and real power over the affairs of the nation, but not in merely endorsing questionable politicians. In engaging government to be accountable the Church must expect reactionary forces and the beneficiaries of corruption to begin to say the usual nonsense like, “the Church should leave politics alone”, “the Clergy have no business with governance”, “there should be a separation of the State and religion”, blah, blah, blah. But we know this is false. Religion is best placed to serve the purpose of regulation and moderation of human conduct. A nation with active religious presence and influence is well placed to avoid being a banana republic, which Nigeria seems headed to, and we cannot afford to be a banana republic. A wise man, Peter Kay said humorously of such a republic that, “You never know where to look when eating a banana.”
I know the Church can force a positive turn around for our nation for one reason. In the heat of the rage over the killing of the ten youth service corps members in Bauchi, the Bishop, Diocese of Lagos West Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion), Dr. Peter Awelewa Adebiyi was reported on page 55 of the Nation newspaper of Friday, May 13, 2011 in a story captioned Bishop threatens showdown on NYSC reform and written by Dada Aladelokun (Assistant Editor) saying, “We will continue to harp on it and I enjoin every member of this Church and all well-meaning Nigerians to support us in this crusade. And I make bold to say that if the government will not heed our call, I will lead this congregation on a march on the National Assembly. We can no longer condone this wanton killing of our future leaders.” The Bishop was making a case for the review of the N.Y.S.C. scheme where possibly graduates could be posted to their states or regions to serve. But what struck me was the realization that the clergy knew they could bring out their congregation to march on the street or march on any arm of government to demand for change and yet, all this while that government upon government were serially raping and plundering our resources they kept mute. Don’t tell me that they have been speaking to rulers privately, for the Bible says in Proverbs 27:5 that “Open rebuke is better than secret love.” I was excited that at least the Church has jerked back to life and to her calling. So, let us move on.
In the thick of the dilly dally by the National Assembly and late President Yar’Adua’s cabinet last year over whether to pass a resolution declaring the then sick President incapacitated in order to make way for then Vice President Goodluck Jonathan to become Acting President, Pastor Mrs. Sarah Amakwu, Senior Pastor, Family Worship Centre, Abuja pulled her Church congregation to join the march organized by the Save Nigeria Group led by Pastor Tunde Bakare, Mr. Femi Falana (SAN), Mrs. Naja’atu Mohammed, Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, Prof. Wole Soyinka and other leaders of Civil Society Organizations calling on the National Assembly and the cabinet to declare the sick President incapacitated. The unrelenting pressure they mounted caused the dithering Senate to do the right thing, and Vice President Goodluck Jonathan was declared Acting President. I have observed with amusement how shady politicians and some media people are now attributing that feat to Senate President David Mark in order for him to retain the senate presidency, conveniently forgetting that he led the most over paid, underperforming and most corrupt parliament in the world. The same pressure was exerted by the same individuals and organizations to compel an also dithering President Goodluck Jonathan to send Prof. Maurice Iwu to an inglorious retirement, for it seemed he and his party were intent on retaining Prof. Iwu’s injurious services which had served them well at the expense of the nation. The same pressure by the same persons and groups caused government to look outside some suggested questionable characters that were being bandied about as possible replacement for Prof. Iwu. President Jonathan is now being cleverly credited with that feat also; in fact it was part of his campaigns songs. As time flies, if you are not careful, it will carry your memory along its wings into mental recession. That’s my quote.
The point here is the Church can take the lead in organizing marches, walks or sit-ins against cases of injustice, corruption and sit-tight rulers. Great man of God, Pastor Enoch Adeboye, the G.O. of the Redeemed Christian Church of God was widely reported last year to have said he will lead his Church in protest if the 2011 elections were fraudulent. This is commendable. The presidential elections, and even the other elections could not be said to have been fair; the rigging commenced when the ruling party rigged out a zone that was supposed to produce the candidate for the election, and the rigging continued up to the presidential primaries where delegates had their status changed to dollargates, and it went through to the general elections where money and incumbency proved decisive. This much was also testified by Rev. Moses Iloh, the Shepherd-in-charge of Soul-Winning Ministries, Lagos. The man of God was quoted by Gabriel Dike, a Sun newspaper reporter on page 13 of their Tuesday, May 17, 2011 edition in a story titled 2011 polls, most sophisticated electoral fraud – Rev Moses Iloh as saying, “the secret agendum was to ensure victory at all costs for Mr. President at the polls in the full consciousness that Nigeria parades the most disreputable, conscienceless and despicable judiciary when it comes to election tribunals…..there was no control limit placed on funds to be expended on the election campaign. There was no question that it was government’s scarce funds that were irresponsibly wasted on campaign funding by the incumbents.” Earlier in the story the reporter said the man of God referred to the election as the most expensive, sophisticated, highly educated and well-mannered electoral fraud in the history of the country despite the determination of Nigerians to protect their votes. On the consequence of the Church’s bias in the elections the man of God said, “The polity was violently raped and now pregnant with two dangerous bastards: religion and tribalism. When the pregnancy matured and these monsters are delivered, they will at birth, show up with 32 fully matured teeth.” Scary situation Nigeria has been walked into, you might agree. Well, the protest marches as proposed by God’s servant Pastor Adeboye should not be limited to elections issues alone; it should be commenced and sustained for good governance. This is one of the ways in which the Spirit of the Church will be felt in society compelling positive change. It is this attitude that fuelled and is still fuelling the mass uprisings in almost all the Arab States, whose living standards are far beyond those of Nigerians. Yet, they are determined to create a better society for themselves. Some Christians may be scoffing at them, even assuming that it could be a divine confusion set among them, but the Lord has a Word for them thus: “And the lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely: for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.” Luke 16:8. So, the children of light (the Church) watch idly and even endorse corrupt politicians to be plundering the resources of God and as they are plundering they will be praying for them in Church for “wisdom and divine guidance” while others elsewhere are determined that such plunder cannot be. So, who is wiser? That Scripture has given the answer clearly.
The Church must rise up to her calling of societal accountability, so that thievery in government will stop, for no society can afford to have people with inherent inclination to stealing public funds as leaders because of the spiritual implication of this negative inclination: “….This is the curse that goeth forth over the face of the whole earth: for every one that stealeth shall be cut off…. I will bring it forth, saith the LORD of hosts, and it shall enter into the house of the thief, and into the house of him that sweareth falsely by my name: and it shall remain in the midst of his house, and shall consume it with the timber thereof and the stones thereof.” Zechariah 5:3 & 4. So, the penalty for a thief and those who use God’s name fraudulently is shared with their household without exemption. Little wonder Nigeria has not been doing well in spite of prayers like, “O’ Lord, bless our leaders with wisdom and guide them.” If the Church leads the way in the fight against mis-governance she would of course be joined by the rest of society, bringing healing and unity of purpose in the society and ultimately restoring the honour of the Church. Do I even have to say the Church will be feared by evil forces?
The book of Acts of the Apostles does not read Prayers of the Apostles. No, it showed the Apostles engaging in civil disobediences against what was wrong. While they were praying they were also acting. Good example of faith without works being dead. Nigeria must rank as the most praying nation in the world, but it should not stop there. There must be physical involvement. God will not come down in Person to remove evil from society, no. He works with us and through us. There should be no reason why Nigeria with plenty of Churches should not be better off than churchless nations like Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, China, Indonesia, etc.
The Lord Jesus Christ said a parable about the sleeping Church and the consequence thus: “…..The Kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field: But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way.” Matthew 13:24 & 25. So, as the Church slept, the devil came and sowed the tares of corruption, kidnappings, thefts, robberies and all manner of violence and evil, and Nigerians are in tears caused by these tares! As the Church slept, the devil anointed political leaders for the nation and masterfully, characteristically and deceptively presented them to the Church for their signature. This sleep should end!
Ironically, a Nigerian pastor, Sunday Adelaja was used mightily by God to bring a revolutionary change in Ukraine in 2005 by pulling out his large congregation unto the streets of the capital, Kiev. He detailed his story in his book CHURCH SHIFT. In Nigeria, we have pastors that pull large crowds in miracle or healing conventions. The congregations revere them to the point of total adoration and submission. Can they now harness this gift to change this nation radically in order to escape God’s imminent judgement? It is called Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR. It is time.