Tuesday, 26 June 2012

Cleric expresses concern over state of the nation.


The Bishop, Remo Diocese (Anglican Communion), The Right Reverend (Dr) Michael Olusina Fape, has expressed concern over the state of the nation, calling on the federal government to rise to the challenges confronting it.
Bishop Fape said this in his presidential address delivered to the Second Session of the tenth synod of the Diocese on Friday, at the Holy Trinity Anglican Church, Ipara-Remo, Ogun State with the theme, “They (Christians) are not of the world.”
He urged Christians to be actively involved in the activities of their immediate environment by remaining in the Lord.
The cleric noted that the all social vices confronting the country had continued to increase on a daily basis, despite several calls to governments at all levels to checkmate those problems.
The  Bishop said, “ As Nigerians, we have no other country than this one. Therefore, we must make it as Nehemiah to seek the welfare of this nation. While so many social evils have been identified in the past year in our charge, there seems not to be respite yet for Nigerians.
“Kidnapping is still in place, the power sector is still in comatose, and corruption has become an established evil staring at us in the face as a nation in all the three tiers of government.
“Today, those who are supposed to bring succour to the masses have added to their plight. The Pension Fund that is supposed to bring succour to the retirees has been embezzled by the custodians!”
Bishop Fape noted that different probe panels investigating the corrupt practices of Nigeria’s political office holders and public servants was a pointer to the fact that the corruption was the bane of our national development.
“It now seems as if the primary assignment of the National Legislators is to probe, and revelations from the unending probes on Power sector, Petroleum subsidy, Nigerian Stock Exchange Council and Pension Fund make a mockery of our national leaders as bunch of hypocrites, who though know the truth, but cannot speak the truth because their hands are already soiled. Certainly, corruption is the bane of our development in this nation. But the question is,who will deliver us from this monster of corruption?”, he queried
On Ogun State, the Bishop commended the State Governor, Senator Ibikunle Amosun, who was represented at the ocassion by the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Mrs. Olayinka Kukoyi, on his administration approach to tackle insecurity in the state.
The Bishop advised Amosun to beware of political sychopants who are were only interested in deceiving him.
The cleric lauded the gesture of the Chief Executive Officer, Tanus Communication, Dr. Yemi Ogunbiyi, for sponsoring the Synod which was hosted last year by the matriach of the Awolowo dynasty, Chief (Mrs) HID Awolowo

Jonathan and the Buhari burden


Jonathan and Buhari
Is it time for President Goodluck Jonathan to bare his fangs against Gen. Muhammadu Buhari? OLALEKAN ADETAYO examines the feud between the duo which might be a long-drawn battle
One of the steps always taken by people who desire to do well in any position (political offices inclusive) is to keep in touch with their predecessors and tap from their wealth of experience. Such steps are aimed at learning from the successes and failures of such predecessors in order to avoid some pitfalls.
The position of the President is not an exception in this regard. Apart from the various advisory bodies, incumbent Presidents sometimes rely on their predecessors for advice on issues of national importance.
Interestingly, the nation’s constitution also recognises the importance of tapping into the experience of former presidents with its provision for the Nigeria Council of State as an organ of government. The council’s functions include advising the executive on policy making.
The Council of State consists of the incumbent President, who is the Chairman; Vice President, who is the Deputy Chairman; all former Presidents of the federation and all former Heads of the Government of the Federation; all former Chief Justices of Nigeria; President of the Senate; Speaker of the House of Representatives, all state governors and the Attorney-General of the Federation. Such is the importance attached to the wealth of experience of former Nigerian leaders.
 It will therefore naturally be a thing of concern for a sitting president to have one of those who he should ordinarily rely on for advice and support to be his number one public critic.
This is the scenario currently playing out between President Goodluck Jonathan and one of his predecessors, Gen. Muhammadu Buhari (retd).
The Daura, Katsina State-born general was the Head of State between December 31, 1983 and August 27, 1985. Since the return of democracy to Nigeria, Buhari has attempted to become a civilian president three times (in 2003, 2007 and 2011) without success.
In 2003, Buhari contested the presidential election as the candidate of All Nigeria Peoples Party.  The candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party in that election, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, Buhari was defeated with a margin of more than 11 million votes. He contested the result of the election up to the Supreme Court but lost. Till today, Buhari still holds the belief that he won that election but that he was short-changed by the Independent National Electoral Commission and the courts.
Buhari, as a candidate of the ANPP also contested the 2007 election which was won by his kinsman, late President Umar Yar’Adua of the PDP. In the election, Buhari polled 18 per cent of the votes cast against Yar’Adua’s 70 per cent. Like what happened during the previous election, the general rejected the result and again contested it to the Supreme Court but lost.
Yar’Adua’s admission that the election that brought him to office was largely flawed and a promise to carry out electoral reform, seemed to have confirmed Buhari’s fears that such polls since 2003 were anything but democratic.
In March 2010, Buhari left the ANPP for the Congress for Progressive Change, which he founded, with which he contested the 2011 presidency Jonathan won that election. Buhari polled 12,214,853 votes, coming second behind Jonathan of the PDP who polled 22,495,187 votes. He repeated the same ritual of approaching the courts and again lost.
Having lost three presidential elections in a row, Buhari became understandably critical of government.
Such criticism reached its crescendo last Monday, when Buhari reportedly threatened that there would be bloodbath in 2015 if its general elections do not reflect the will of the people. He thundered:  “God willing, by 2015, something will happen. They either conduct a free and fair election or they go a very disgraceful way. If what happened in 2011 (alleged rigging) should again happen in 2015, by the grace of God, the dog and the baboon would all be soaked in blood,” Buhari reportedly told the party members who paid him a courtesy visit in Kaduna last Monday.
He also blasted the Federal Government under Jonathan’s leadership as the real Boko Haram (Boko Haram is the Islamic sect that has claimed responsibility for most of the bombings in the North).
Not ready to allow him have a field day unchallenged, the presidency and the ruling PDP in separate reactions fired back at the general, describing him as a frustrated serial election loser and a sectional leader. While the presidency said the statement by Buhari was “saddening,” the PDP said it portrayed the ex-Head of State as a “blood-thirsty person who lacked democratic credentials.”
The presidency, in a statement by presidential spokesman, Dr. Reuben Abati, said it found it very sad that an elder statesman who once presided over the whole of Nigeria could reduce himself to a regional leader who spoke for only a part of the country.
National Publicity Secretary of the PDP, Olisa Metuh,  also said, “It is unfortunate that at this time of grave security challenge while Nigerians are burying their dead and counting their losses, Buhari, who wants to rule them, is further inflaming the orgy of violence. What a bloodthirsty leader in Buhari! If the retired general was suffering from combat withdrawal syndrome, then the Federal Government should allow him to lead the ECOWAS military contingent to Mali or Guinea Bissau to enable him have an opportunity to exorcise the bloodletting demons apparently haunting him.”
Metuh touched a sensitive area when he said that Nigeria has yet to recover from the huge losses it suffered due to such “reckless and provocative remarks” by Buhari before the 2011 general elections which led to a spate of bloody post-election violence across six states of the federation.
In making that assertion, Metuh apparently relied on the report of the Dr. Sheikh Lemu-led Federal Government Investigation Panel on the 2011 Election Violence and Civil Disturbances which was set up by Jonathan to probe the post-election violence recorded in some parts of the North.
While presenting the report to the President in October 2011, Lemu said the panel identified provocative utterances by many individuals and widespread charge by prominent politicians including Buhari to the electorate to guard their votes as possible cause of the post-election crisis.
Lemu said such charge by politicians appeared to have been misconstrued by many voters to include recourse to violence, which they did.
He however attempted to give Buhari a soft landing when he added that it was discovered during a long interactive session between the former Head of State  and a five-member delegation of the panel on September 14, 2011 that the CPC candidate himself was a victim of the violence as his property were reportedly destroyed.
Not a few Nigerians believe that Buhari’s latest outburst could also spark off another round of violence.
The Senator representing Oyo South, Senator Femi Lanlehin, urged the two gladiators in the face-off to sheathe their swords in the interest of the nation.
 He said, “We are in precarious times; there is insecurity everywhere. Anything that will aggravate the situation should be avoided. If Buhari had said what he was reported to have said, the President too should have ignored him.”
Also, a politician, Chief Olu Akerele, described the face-off between Buhari and Jonathan as unnecessary. The former Personal Assistant to late Chief MKO Abiola said it was unfortunate that people including the government were misinterpreting what Buhari said.
He said, “Is the FG and the PDP planning to rig in 2015? Why are they panicking, if they are not? They should even praise the retired general for speaking the truth. What he said was conditional: rig and get into trouble. The President should not divert attention from numerous problems confronting the nation which he has not been able to solve. To me, Buhari is not the reason why he has not been able to fix power, provide security, tar roads, provide jobs and other problems bedevilling the country.  Let him face governance and stop chasing shadows.”
The current rift between the two however, appears to be a long-drawn one as Buhari who has been backed by the Action Congress of Nigeria and Northern governors against the presidency, has alleged that Jonathan plans to arrest him.
A government source however, dismissed the idea of “doing anything with the army general will suggest a clampdown on opposition,” he said.

Gowon’s distortion of facts

 by AKUTA CHINEDU

This is in response to statements credited to ex-Head of State, Gen. Yakubu Gowon (retd), during a post-humous award ceremony for the tripod of Nigeria’s independence and First Republic leaders, Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe, Sir Ahmadu Bello and Chief Obafemi Awolowo.
According to a national newspaper, Gowon said Igbo leader and Biafran warlord, the late Gen. Chukwuemeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu would have succeeded in ruling the country if he had not been checkmated when he declared the Republic of Biafra and consequently triggered the civil war in 1967.
The former head of state, who came to power during the second military putsch on July 29, 1966 and ruled till July 29, 1975 when his regime was toppled in another coup that led to the installation of the late Gen. Murtala Muhammed, spoke against the background of a documentary on the fratricidal war shown at the ceremony.
Reliving some of the events of the civil war fought between July 6, 1967 and January 12, 1970, Gowon described it as a needless war and one never to be wished for again; adding that the war would not have arisen if Odumegwu-Ojukwu had not severed the eastern part from the rest of the country.
“If there was no secession by the late Odumegwu-Ojukwu, there would not have been war. We tried all we could to avoid going to war. At the Aburi meeting (held in Ghana in January to forestall the imminent war), all that was demanded by Ojukwu, including my position, were granted. But his secession bid led to the war. If Ojukwu had not done what he did, he would have been a Nigerian and not Biafran leader. Nigerians and, indeed, the children who suffered during the war, should forgive us,” Gowon said.
Since the death of Odumegwu-Ojukwu, Gowon has made two conflicting statements. In all, he tried to twist facts about the civil war, all in an attempt to portray Dim Odumegwu-Ojukwu as the aggressor. This is unacceptable.
First, I wonder why Gowon has chosen to make conflicting statements about the events that happened before and during the war, only after Odumegwu-Ojukwu had died. The question is, why didn’t he make these statements when Odumegwu-Ojukwu was alive, since both of them were the two principal actors?
Indeed, Gowon should have been kind enough to tell his audience the true reasons behind the war. The author, having gone through the Aburi meeting records, could not see where Odumegwu-Ojukwu asked for Gowon’s position; so, why would he say such things? Besides, who jettisoned the Aburi Accord – Gowon or Ojukwu? Nigerians cannot be deceived. Be it known to all Nigerians that part of our problems today is the non-implementation of the Aburi Accord by the Gowon administration. Gowon should publicly accept responsibilities for the civil war.
For the records, the war was imposed on the Igbo. Biafra was the only beacon of hope for all fleeing Igbo then. If Gowon was concerned, why didn’t he stop the pogrom in the North then? Why did he impose food blockade during the war and even after the war? What did he do about the abandoned properties? What about the policy/punishment of giving every Igbo person only 20 pounds, even if the person(s) had millions in bank accounts?
Someone should tell Gowon to stop twisting facts, if only not to reopen the wounds of the civil war.

2015: A damned bloody presidential prediction!

Gen. Muhammadu BuhariGen. Muhammadu Buhari, a former Head of State shoots from the hips and does not suffer fools gladly. For three consecutive terms, he has run for election with the hope of beating the ruling Peoples Democratic Party and for three times he had failed. Despite announcing recently and in the aftermath of the 2011 election that he is done with the race, Buhari has in the past few days stirred the Hornet's nest by predicted bloodshed in 2015 if, in his views, elections are rigged "again". Coming at a time Nigerians are still struggling with the general insecurity in the country, not a few are worried that the General may belaying the foundation for another round of bloodletting. EMMANUEL ENYINNAYA APPOLOS, reports.
"If what happened in 2011 should again happen in 2015, by the grace of God, the dog and the baboon will all be soa Red in blood."

With the above quote, former Head of State, Gen. Mohammadu Buhari, sounded a blood chilling warning about the conduct of the 2015 presidential election, which is three years away.

Buhari ran for the presidency in 2003 against former President Olusegun   Obasanjo   on   the platform of the All Nigeria eoples Party, ANPP and lost. He fought the battle from the Presidential Election Petitions Tribunal to the Supreme Court and lost. In 2007, he came out again on theplatform of the ANPP and ran against the late President Umaru Musa Yar'Adua. He lost again. He also fought up to the Supreme Court andlost by a split decision of four to three against Yar'Adua.

But that battle separated him from his then party, ANPP, following the party's decision not to follow him on the court journey. Thus, when he came out again in 2011, he ran against President Goodluck Jonathan, on his own platform, a special purpose vehicle called the Congress for Progressive Change, CPC, a party he founded himself.

In all the three elections, Buhari believed that the PDP rigged him out from winning the elections. He also believed that the courts' decisions which went against him were influenced by the PDP. He is angry. He appears frustrated by his inability to fulfill the dream of ruling Nigeria.

The last time he made such a comment, during the 2011 presidential election that he lost to Jonathan, Nigerians indeed, paid with their blood. At the flag off of his campaign in Kaduna in March 2011, Buhari had told his supporters to lynch anybody who attempted to rig the 2011 election. He had said, 'Tbu should never leave polling centres until votes are counted and the winner declared and you should lynch anybody that tries to tinker with the votes".

He went on to lampoon the PDP for misruling Nigeria since 1999. In his words, "We are internationally recognized for corruption, inefficiency, business uncertainty and infrastructural decay. For 12 years., the PDP government has failed to tackle all these problems in spite of the resources at their disposal. We can and we must reverse these trends." He said the first step to achieving that was for Nigerians to vote PDP out. "They are finished. They have passed their sell-by date1'

Soon after, the blood of scores of southerners flowed as the Independent National Electoral Commission announced Jonathan the winner of the election. A massive crisis erupted in major cities of the north, leaving in its wake death of thousands ofinnocent Nigerians, mostly from the southern part of the country with many of them being Youth Corps members, who were posted to serve on the compulsory one year national service. Their major sin was that they worked as ad hoc staffers of the INEC in the election. Since then, blood has continued to flow unabated in the north.

The latest being the bloody onslaught unleashed on churches, government establishments and public places in the north by Islamic insurgents, Boko Haram. As far as Nigerians can remember, two things stand out in the battle between Buhari and the PDP, which led to his latest outburst.

One: Jonathan defeated Buhari in 2011 through the massive votes of Nigerians. Two: Buhari said blood would flow if he didn't win. He lost and, as predicted, blood did flow. During the week, Buhari trod the beaten path and declared that 2015 would be bloody. He went further to identify three types of Boko Haram operating in Nigeria,   and  described  the Jonathan administration as the biggest Boko Haram in the country.

Buhari told members of his party who visited him in Kaduna, that "since the leaders do not listen to anybody but do whatever they wish, there is nothing the North can do".
He added: "I will like to quote Prof. Ango Abdullahi, who said there are three Boko Harams, including the original one, led by Muhammed Yusufu, who was killed and his supporters tried to take revenge in attacking the law enforcement agencies and politicians.

'There is another developed Boko Haram of criminals, who steal and kill. The biggest Boko Haram is the Federal Government." He went further to drum it into the ears of his followers, perhaps the same people who decoded his speech in 2011 that: "If what happens in 2011  should again happen in 2015, by the grace of God, the dog and the baboon will all be soaked in blood."

Jonathan, who failed to ensure that the masterminds of the post 2011 election crisis in the north, were brought to book, has decided to engage Buhari in media war this time, describing the Daura, Katsina State-born soldier-turned-politician's comments as 'unbecoming of a former head of state.' Jonathan's response to Buhari contained in a statement issued by his Special Adviser on Communications, Dr Reuben Abati, reads: "The attention of the Presidency has been drawn to unfortunate statements in the media made by former Head of State and presidential candidate of the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC), Major Gen. Muhammadu Buhari (rtd) in which he allegedly predicted bloodshed in 2015 and labeled the Federal Government-led by President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, as "the biggest Boko Haram".

"But perhaps the most unfortunate part of the statement was the portion in which Buhari said that, "Since the leaders now don't listen to anybody but do whatever they wish, there is nothing the north can do." "We find it very sad that an elder statesman, who once presided over the entirety of Nigeria? can reduce himself to a regional leader who speaks for only a part ofNigeria.

"We now understand what his protege and former Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Malam Nasir El'Rufai, meant when he wrote in a public letter in October of 2010, telling Nigerians that Buhari remains "perpetually unelectable" and that Buhan's "insensitivity to Nigeria's diversity and his parochial focus are already well-known."

"Who can know Buhari better than his own political associate? Come to think of it, as the CPC presidential candidate in the 2011 election, how many states in the Federation did he visit to campaign for votes? Buhari never bothered to campaign in the southern part of the country and consistently played up the North-South divide to the chagrin of patriotic and well-meaning Nigerians.

"As the results revealed, Nigerians will never vote for anyone who wants to divide the country. Is Buhari going to continue to be a sectional leader? "The Federal Government led by President Jonathan is not Boko Haram. Boko Haram means Western Education is sin. "That being the case, one wonders how a government that devoted the largest sectoral allocation in the 2D 12 budget to education could be said to be Boko Haram.

"Between 1983, when Buhari forcefully seized power from the democratically elected administration of President Shehu Usman Shagari, and 2012, no other administration has committed the same quantum of resources as the Jonathan administration to education in the part ofNigeria that has witnessed the most Boko Haram-related insecurity.

"Only on April 10,2012, President Jonathan commissioned the first of 400 Federal Government Model Almajiri Schools, equipped with modern facilities such as a Language Laboratory, Qur'an Recitation Hall, classrooms and dormitories as well as a clinic, vocational workshop, dining hall and quarters for the Mallams. "As Nigerians read this, more of such schools have been completed.

We now challenge Major General Buhari (rtd) to tell Nigerians what he has done, whether in his capacity as the head of a military junta or in his private capacity, to bring education to vulnerable children. If he cannot live up to this challenge, perhaps he has to reassess who really is Boko Haram.

"Buhari claims that the Federal Government does not listen. Such an accusation ought not to emanate from a man overthrown by his own hand- picked colleagues in the military for refusing to listen to advice and behaving as if he had a monopoly ofknowledge.

It is on record that the Federal Government led by President Jonathan is a listening administration hence its decision to pursue all means of resolving the Boko Haram insurgency including through dialogue. "When Buhari says that "if what happens in 2011 should again happen in 2015, by the grace of God, 'the dog and the baboon would all be soaked in blood", we hereby state that it is Buhari himself who does not listen. He has obviously refused to listen to the Nigerian People, the European Union, the Commonwealth Monitoring Group, the African Union and a multitude of independent electoral monitors who testified that the 2011 elections were free and fair and "the best elections since Nigeria returned to civil rule."

"Indeed, such a reaction from Buhari is not totally unexpected since he has become a serial election loser who has never taken his past election defeats graciously even when such elections were generally acknowledged to be free and fair. "Still on the issue of Boko Haram, we wonder what locus a man whose party's Secretary General, Buba Galadima, told the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) in December, 2010, that the Federal Government is underestimating the support base of Boko Haram, has to accuse a government that has been threatened on camera by the leaders of Boko Haram of itself being Boko Haram? "Major General Buhari (rtd) also boasts of his knowledge of the Petroleum Industry because of his time as Federal Commissioner for Petroleum. We wonder why he did not boast of the infamous scandal that occurred in that ministry where under his watch; billions of Naira (in the 1970s) were reported stolen, a matter which led to the setting up of the Justice Ayo Irikefe panel.

"Finally, we wish to make it known to Buhari that given his reference to "dogs and baboons", perhaps his best course of action would be to travel to the zoo of his imagination because President Goodluck Jonathan was elected by human beings to preside over human beings and it is human beings who will determine what happens in Nigeria at any material time not "dogs and baboons". If the president reserved any respect for Buhari, his party, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) did not. It toed the path of Mr. President in a statement signed by its National Publicity Secretary, Chief Oliseh Metu, where the party also described Buhari   as   a   'blood   thirsty Eolitician   who   relishes loodshed.'

"We condemn in no uncertain terms, this shameful call for the spill of blood of innocent Nigerians to acquire political power.

We need to remind ourselves that on April 21, 2012, Buhari was reported in the media as predicting a bloody revolution in 2015. The reports in the national dailies quoting the same retired General as repeating that blood will flow in 2015 is another build-up to Buhari's relish of funeral train.

"It is unfortunate that at this time of grave security challenge, while Nigerians are burying their dead and counting their losses, Gen. Buhari, who wants to rule them, is further inflaming the orgy of violence. What a blood thirsty leader in Buhari" "It is on record that Nigeria is yet to recover from the huge losses it suffered due to such reckless and
Erovocative remarks by Buhari efore the 2011 general elections which led to a spate of bloody post-election violence across six states of the federation," PDP said.

Meanwhile, it will be recalled that the report of a 22-man Sheikh Ahmed Lemu-led Presidential Committee on Post-Election Violence, set up by President Jonathan indicted Buhari.

According to reports of the panel, Buhari's provocative remarks played a role in the bloody violence that led to the death of 10 members of the National Youth Service Corps, (NYSC) and hundreds of others after last April's presidential polls. "Provocative utterances by many individuals and the widespread charge by prominent politicians including the CPC presidential candidate to the electorate 'to fuard their votes' appeared to ave been misconstrued by many voters to include recourse to violence which they did.

However, a long interactive session was held with the CPC presidential candidate and five member delegation of the panel, led by the chairman, in the office of the CPC presidential candidate in Kaduna on 14th September 2011. It was discovered that he himself was a victim of the violence and of the destruction of his property the photographs of which were given to the said delegation," the panel's report said.

Apart from Buhari's utterances, the panel also said that the government's failure to implement reports of past commissions and panels on ethno-religious and political crises also contributed to the postelection violence and urged the government to implement the reports.

However, Buhari, through his spokesman, Mr. Yinka Odumakin, denied making inciting utterances, saying that the panel and the Federal Government were executing a
Pre-determined agenda since the DP and President Jonathan had earlier accused the CPC of being responsible for the mayhem even before the panel was raised. "Before the panel was set up, President Jonathan and the PDP had accused the CPC of being responsible.

"They have to prove that Buhari's utterances ignited the violence. There was no comment that he made beyond that people should defend their votes. The Independent National Election Commission (INEC) said people should vote, wait and defend their votes. Buhari did not say anything than people should protect their votes. They have an agenda they are executing. They are working on a script, Odumakin said.

Though, Jonathan who received the report himself then, vowed to implement the recommendations of the panel no matter the individuals involved, insisting that "the culture of impunity would be erased by the government and heavens will not fall". Months after he made the vow, nothing has happened. The panel advised President Jonathan that "people indicted by the committees and commissions concerned should be prosecuted. These recommendations are based on what the panel observed from many victims of those previous disturbances who are nursing reprisals and have only been waiting for the slightest excuse to move into action which some of them did during the 2011 election violence and civil disturbances".

Responding, President Jonathan said: "I assure you, on our part, we will follow your recommendations. You did mention that one of the problem is that when recommendations are made   to   government, government hardly implements them.

They will make speeches, make pronouncements, then the media will carry it, then they lock them up, though some recommendations may be difficult for implementations".

However? it is obvious that Buhari might not be alone in this blood thirsty adventure as his party CPC, the Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) and the Conference of Nigerian Political Parties (CNPP) have all applauded Buhan. The National Publicity Secretary of CPC, Mr. Rotimi Fashakin said that Buhari only reiterating what, in their view, many Nigerians had been saying for long.

"They are merely talking balderdash; what General Buhan has said is what many Nigerians have expressed. Remember Professor Wole Soyinka had said election rigging is violence against people and that they have the right to confront violence with greater violence". PDP colluded with Professor Atahiru Jega's INEC to foist Jonathan on us. That's why we are battling with this clueless government. There must be sanctity of votes of Nigerian electorate.

"What Buhari was trying to say is that, it would not be business as usual. So, only the guilty should be afraid of retribution. It is certain that retribution is coming. So, why shouldPDPbe afraid"? On its part, the ACF responding through its national publicity secretary, Anthony Sani, said Buhari's comment was nothing new as he noted that many eminent Nigerians including former President Olusegun Obasanjo had also inferred as such.

"Buhari has not said anything that has not been said before. What people are saying is that he should not nave said it because he has mass appeal among the people." For CNPP's Mr. Osita Okechukwu, "The problem on ground now is due to the fact that many of those holding elective positions were not elected by the people, in actual fact. Therefore, they don't have any sense of accountability and responsibility towards the people." As expected, the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) also backed Buhan in the verbal fight. The party in a statement issued by its National Publicity Secretary, Alhaji Lai Mohammed in Osogbo, Osun State, reiterated that the 2011 general elections remain the most systematically-rigged polls in Nigeria's history, irrespective of the so-called endorsement by some visceral foreign election monitors.

"We hold no brief for anyone, but it is true that if elections are rigged, as they have been so shamelessly and brazenly done by the PDP since 1999? naturally, people will react, and in doing so, it is impossible for anyone to predict how far things can go. This is what, in our opinion, Gen. Buhari warned against. If the presidency and the PDP have no intention to rig in 2015, why are they so worried about the consequences of such action? "The 2011 elections also left Nigeria divided along ethnic and religious lines, more than at any other time in the history of Nigeria, hence no one should tell us about the polls being the best since Nigeria returned to civil rule, just because some self-acclaimed monitors said so!" ACN said.

Can the ACN be taken seriously in the talk about systematic rigging of the 2011 elections? If the 2011 election were systematically rigged, then the question should be: how did the Bola Tinubu controlled  party   systematically fot control of the southwest in the 011 election, yet its presidential candidate, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu lost in all the ACN states but for Osun State. Who systematically rigged the ACN presidential candidate out, even in Lagos State? For now though, Nigerians are waiting anxiously to know the next step that will be taken in the verbal war between Buhari, his supporters and the PDP.

How 1975 coup dragged Nigeria backwards, by Asiodu

FORMER Special Adviser to President Shehu Shagari on Economic Matters, Chief Philip Asiodu, at the weekend lamented the state of the nation and said the promoters of the 1975 military coup truncated Nigeria’s quest for true development and leap to a world power.
According to the retired permanent secretary who is now the chairman of the Council of Retired Federal Permanent Secretaries, if those who took over from the Gen. Yakubu Gowon’s administration had continued with the development plans, which the regime laid out in the 1975 to 1980 National Development plan and also did not indulge in mass sack of civil servants, the country would have been a developed nation now away from where majority of the population live in poverty.
Speaking at the 2012 yearly general meeting of the council in Lagos at the weekend, Asiodu, a former Economic Adviser to former president Olusegun Obasanjo, maintained that it was at that point Nigeria deviated from the road to development and has not recovered till date.
“The whole position is that when you have no plan, you cannot achieve anything. The coup against Gowon did two terrible things on the country, though the two leading members of that cabinet were members of Gowon cabinet, who approved the 75 to 80 National Development Plan. We were going into pulp and paper metallurgy as well as agro-allied to create a good base for our industrialisation and ensure job creation.
“But when we had that coup, not only the plan was abandoned, 10,000 civil servants were removed. And that destroyed the confidence, non-partisanship and courage in the civil service. In my time in the civil service, you can tell a minister sir, you want to do this, here are three options, and he knows you are advising him objectively, your commitment is to him and the country to succeed.
“That coup destroyed the leadership of the civil service, destroyed the people who could have been custodians of check and balances, who can say, you cannot do this or that. That was when Nigeria diverged, we were at par with Malaysia and Singapore. Today, we are 40 years behind them. We started assembling cars before South Korea, but today we are importing cars from South Korea. Should that be? But go abroad, in many universities or any institutions, Nigerians are there and on top. The coup truncated that plan.”
Asiodu called on politicians and bureaucrats to imbibe the value of responsiveness to what the people need and be always guided by the desire to want to help to lift Nigeria to a certain development platform for the benefit of the majority.
He recalled that “our founding fathers, Azikwe, Awolowo, and Balewa, the campaign then was, give us independence and we shall improve the condition of the people, and they showed it.
“As soon as we had regional government in the West and the East, there was tremendous increase in the number of farm settlement scheme, expansion in school, award of scholarship to competent deserving ones to go abroad and construction of dams as well as commitment to the drive to improve the condition of life of the ordinary man.
He called for better commitment to the state by elected officials and politicians, recalling that to accelerate development immediately after independence, Balewa and other elected officials cut their salaries by 10 per cent in order to save for developmental projects. He said it was ironical that now, about 74 per cent of the budget is spent on recurrent expenditure.
“At one time, education alone got more than 40 per cent of the budget of the Western and Eastern regions because that is the key to development. But what is it today? We are now spending 74 per cent of the resources on recurrent expenditure and overheads of, may be, 300,000 government officials and a paltry 24 per cent on education, health, manpower and power,” he lamented.
The elder statesman noted that in spite of the huge fund that had come into government coffers, no spectacular projects had been executed since 1975 when there were less fund. The government then executed most of the landmark projects in Nigeria today.
“We are saying the path we are following, this recurrent expenditure fueled by how much we are paying our officials is not sustainable. I believed the leadership should realise that what we are doing is not sustainable,” he said.
Asiodu maintained that what is being paid the elected officials cannot be justified, noting also that the current quality of the civil service is poor and no government can achieve result with a poor civil service, so the country must return to international norms in its civil service procedure.   According to Asiodu, the country does not need more than 18 ministries to drive its development plans. He said with that, Nigeria would be better coordinated and manage the level of waste in governance.

Your Aspiration for 2015 Is Ill-Adviced: Open Letter To Gen. Muhammadu Buhari


By Salihu Moh'd Luman
Sir, I am a citizen of Nigeria, from what is known geographically as the Northern part, and by my training and upbringing, I am taught the virtues of respect for the elder and obedience to responsible and accountable leaders. Coming from Zaria, I have grown up to understand that trust and honesty are important pillars for leadership and this, in cases of aberration, leads to dissent as a result of leadership failure, which always find legitimacy in the absence, or perceived weakening, of these pillars. This leads to the rise of injustice and descent to immorality and criminal conducts in society, giving rise to crisis of confidence and overall anarchy, as we have witnessed in Nigeria over the last few decades.
On December 31, 1983, when you spearheaded the overthrow of the Alh. Shehu Shagari led Second Republic, one of the justification for the coup was the ‘crisis of confidence afflicting our nation’. The reality before us since 1999, as Nigerians, is that we continue to face this crisis of confidence. In fact, if your coup speech is to be replayed, word for word, it will reflect present national conditions. And like in 1983, the yearning for change is evident in the conduct of our politicians which you so lucidly captured in your 1983 speech as follows:
“It is true that there is a worldwide economic recession. However, in the case of Nigeria, its impact was aggravated by mismanagement. We believe the appropriate government agencies have good advice but the leadership disregarded their advice. The situation could have been avoided if the legislators were alive to their constitutional responsibilities; Instead, the legislators were preoccupied with determining their salary scales, fringe benefit and unnecessary foreign travels, et. al ,which took no account of the state of the economy and the welfare of the people they represented. As a result of our inability to cultivate financial discipline and prudent management of the economy, we have come to depend largey on internal and external borrowing to execute government projects with attendant domestic pressure and soaring external debts, thus aggravating the propensity of the outgoing civilian administration to mismanage our financial resources. Nigeria was already condemned perpetually with the twin problem of heavy budget deficits and weak balance of payments position, with the prospect of building a virile and viable economy.
“The last general election was anything but free and fair. The only political parties that could complain of election rigging are those parties that lacked the resources to rig. There is ample evidence that rigging and thuggery were relative to the resources available to the parties. This conclusively proved to us that the parties have not developed confidence in the presidential system of government on which the nation invested so much material and human resources. While corruption and indiscipline have been associated with our state of underdevelopment, these two evils in our body politic have attained unprecedented height in the past few years. The corrupt, inept and insensitive leadership in the last four years has been the source of immorality and impropriety in our society.”
With very minor editing and emphasis, these would aptly describe our reality today. The only fundamental difference was that, unlike in December 1983, our political reality today is in spite of your active partisan involvement. Active partisan involvement to the extent that you were the strongest opposition Presidential candidate and one of the political parties that contested the last general elections (2011) was a party you organized, promoted and fielded candidates for the elections. The party today has a serving Governor for Nasarawa State, Senators, House of Representatives members and many members of House of Assembly in many states under the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC). The fact that, based on performance or conduct of these elected CPC representatives, I can not differentiate them with PDP representatives, is the source of my worry. I am therefore writing you this letter as a contribution to the process whereby we must critically evaluate our actions and honestly provide leadership to the process of moving our people and nation forward.
Let me quickly admit here, in the effort to move our people and nation forward, our primary task must be to develop the capacity to fight oppression and injustice. This requires a capacity to live above board, in other words, the capacity to live exemplary life as a source of moral authority, if you like discipline, which has today come to be strongly associated with your leadership qualities. To that extent therefore one would expect that the CPC state government of Nasarawa will be a model and a source inspiration for Nigerians. Alternatively, we should have a situation where CPC legislators would be “alive to their constitutional responsibilities” and would not be “preoccupied with determining their salary scales, fringe benefit and unnecessary foreign travels.” Unfortunately, we are not able to make this assertion. Perhaps, it is still very early since there is still three years ahead of us.
It is with these issues in mind that I believe it is important I write you. Your recent declaration as reported by News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) on April 13, 2012, to the effect that you will be contesting the 2015 elections compelled me to, not just write to you, but make my views open to the public. In making my views open the public, I am conscious of my limitations as an ordinary citizen and to that extent, therefore, my views will not enjoy the benefits of wide publicity and acceptability.
Consistent with my upbringing, I intend to state my views honestly, truthfully and with the utmost respect to your person. Also, consistent with the training of my parents and teachers, I will, with the best of intentions, convey to you my feelings with high sense of obedience to you as a 70 year old person, who has not just paid his dues but who has remained the only surviving leadership model for my generation. I say this with every sense of responsibility and conscious of the fact that I am not a member of your party and did not vote for you in the last general elections. In fact, I am a member of the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) and contested the 2011 elections as the Senatorial Candidate of the party for Kaduna North.
I am sure with this disclosure you may be tempted to dismiss my views. However, being the leader you are, I also expect that you will at least read the letter before you pass your final judgment. I will therefore proceed to state why I believe your declaration to contest the 2015 Presidential election will not lead us to the desired changes we all aspire to have for Nigeria.
First, as I inferred above, your party, Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) is not different from the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). In fact, the truth is that it has been taken over by what I can call the PDP virus based, on the fact that the only serving Governor of the party was a member of the PDP and only decamped to your party after being denied the opportunity to contest on the platform of the PDP. As a result, his team (Commissioners and members of the State House of Assembly) are predominantly PDP.
In addition, the representatives of the party in the National Assembly (Senators and House of Representatives) have not differentiated themselves from the dominant conduct of PDP members. They have in fact joined the PDP club of legislators to enjoy fat salaries and benefits. They are part and parcel of unaccountable and corrupt legislative order, whose business today is predominantly to resort to blackmails and intimidations with several reported allegations of corrupt practices. Arising from this, we have a national assembly that is unaccountable, whose budget is known only to its members. It is not only CPC representatives that are accomplices to this ugly reality. Representatives of ACN, Labour Party, All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) and all other opposition parties are equally guilty.
The second issue is the fact that the result we have today is a product of the way your party recruited its candidates for the 2011 elections. I am one of those who sincerely believed that you lost the party at the point of its formation, because you were not able to control the process that led to the emergence of leaders of the party. This gave rise to a situation where those who emerged as the leaders of the party at national, state, local government and ward levels are people with the same orientation of PDP, orientation driven by the greed and lust for money and power that has dotted our political landscape today.
On account of this, the party leadership openly courted and facilitated the emergence of known PDP members as candidates of the party for the 2011, people whose core value system is completely at variance with what you stand for and represented. There are of course other situations where people that may not be PDP but are known to have openly fought against you between 2007 and 2011 in your former party, All Nigeria People Party (ANPP), people who have undermined your leadership and sabotaged your cause, became the dominant players in CPC based on the opportunistic strategy of winning elections. Many have won the 2011 elections with your endorsement and are today as guilty as the PDP people you are spearheading the fight against.
The third issue relates to your inability to convert your mass followership into electoral victory in states and at other levels. I expect the response that this is on account of PDP rigging machine. I believe there is PDP rigging, but I also believe that the PDP rigging machine overpowered your popularity because of internal poor party administration, which led to cases of injustice. The case of Katsina and Kano states are good example. It is clear that your party lost the Governorship election in Katsina State because of mismanagement of the party primary. Otherwise, how do you account for a situation where the CPC won majority seats in the State House of Assembly and National Assembly but lost the Governorship election? If the party can defeat PDP at those levels, why was it not able to defeat the PDP at the level of Governorship?
The case of Kano is worse. Being a state where the CPC was very popular, it was a tragedy that the party only contested the Governorship and Presidential elections. This is because all the candidates for House of Assembly, House of Representatives and Senate virtually withdrew from the contest on account of perceived injustice to Alh. Mohammed Abacha who won the party primary but was asked by the party national leadership to withdraw for Col. Lawal Ja’afaru Isa.
Related to this, is the recent case of Kebbi State. Citizens of the state were shocked when after winning a court verdict from the electoral tribunal nullifying the 2011 gubernatorial elections and ordering re-run, the CPC leadership in the state, including the gubernatorial candidate decamped and withdraw from the re-run election. The ACN gubernatorial candidate also did the same. This was possible because the CPC leaders are in the first place PDP in content and substance but finds their way into CPC in order to pursue their greed and lust for power and money.
My fourth issue has to do with the failed attempt for the merger of opposition parties under the National Democratic Movement (NDM) initiative in 2009 and the alliance between the ACN and CPC in 2011. Without going into details, the accounts that is open to the public was that you opted out of the merger negotiations having succeeded in registering the CPC. With respect to the failed alliance of 2011, the account was that while the ACN was ready to withdraw its Presidential candidate, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu in favour of your candidature, the CPC refused to concede the position of Vice President to the ACN.
All these accounts have not been refuted by either you or the CPC leadership. If anything, they were rationalized. Now my worries have turned to fear. This is because I have so many questions that are bothering me. These are: now that you have declared to contest for the 2015 elections, will you have a new approach in the runoff to 2015 or it will be another repeat of the 2003, 2007 and 2011 elections – experience whereby ordinary citizens have very high expectations that you will be able to provide leadership for the electoral defeat of PDP? Will your campaign be driven by the same team of administratively incompetent and politically naïve and deceptive people who have failed to develop a national outlook and expand your support base to cover all parts of the country?
This leads me to my fifth point Sir. As a Northerner, to that extent do you intend to use your aspiration to first throw up credible contestants for political offices in the North, contestants that upon winning elections would spearhead the socio-economic, educational and political development and material transformation of the region for the benefit of the teeming Talakawas? Remember, your political presence alone is a determinant of who win and lose elections in most parts of the 19 states of Northern Nigeria. This will not be an issue at all if your party leadership, your campaign team and other candidates that would be fielded by your party are to have the same coloration or even minimal resemblance to your values. This way you will have a team that sings from the same page and are sensitive to the interests of the masses of the people of Nigeria at home and abroad who are hoping for a new day to dawn for the betterment of their country.  Unfortunately, this is most probably not going to be the case. The truth is that most of the members of your party’s leadership, your campaign team and party candidates are PDP in every respect – they are masquerades parading in borrowed garbs as they care not a whit for the people, but for their own selfish interests. Some of them are even worse than PDP. They will not only emerge as candidates of your party but they will be promoted by you and aided to win elections.
I make this argument with the benefit of experience. It has happened in 2003, 2007 and 2011. You will recall that in 2003, ANPP defeated PDP in Kano with your blessing. It is now history how the ANPP government in Kano between 2003 and 2011 mismanaged and squandered public resources to the point where the people had a sense of missing the PDP government of 1999 – 2003, which partly accounted for the second coming of Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, no thanks to the mismanagement of internal processes of your party, CPC. Similarly, Alh. Isa Yuguda won the 2007 governorship elections in Bauchi with your support. Again, it is now history how Isa Yuguda defected back to PDP shortly after the 2007 elections. Since the emergence of the CPC government in Nasarawa following the 2011 elections, there have been speculations around the Nasarawa governor, Tanko Al-Makura planning to go back to PDP. Although there has been constant denial by your party leadership at both state and national levels, this speculation has remained stubborn.
What this point out is your inadvertent contribution to the phenomenon of bad governance in Nigeria. This needs to be addressed. And looking at the simplistic, intellectually frail and reflectively naive ways you have announced announce your declaration to contest the 2011 elections, it is important we draw your attention to this fact. I call it simplistic, intellectually frail and reflectively naïve because the announcement does not come with critical evaluation of your experiences and a commitment to change the ways you played politics in 2003, 2007 and 2011. If that happens, the result is most likely to be the same – the PDP will again overpower all opposition, including your very humble self and our tragedies and woes will continue.
My sixth point, relates to the fact you will be 73 when the 2015 elections will be conducted. Looking at your personal life, I believe you are sincerely troubled by the absence of alternative leadership in the country and this is what propels you to continue, in good conscience and with good reason, to offer yourself. In evaluating this issue, I think it is really unfortunate that our national situation is almost pushing you to follow the inglorious path of the Robert Mugabe’s and Abdullai Wade’s of Africa. With the administratively incompetent and politically naive team that you have currently in place, based on my analysis above and if past experience is a guide to future possibilities, the probability that your Presidential candidature for 2015 will be overpowered internally by forces of reaction and retrogression and externally by the vampire PDP machinery is very high.
What do we do therefore? Do we simply just surrender to PDP without a fight and to that extent ask you to withdraw your interest in contesting for the 2015 Presidential elections? If we ask you to withdraw, would that not simply translate to abdication of our responsibility to our people? What then are the options before us?
Sir, these are not easy questions to answer, yet we must answer them convincingly. First, we must on no account surrender to the pestilence that is PDP – from 1999 to now, they have constituted the worst nightmare and disaster of Nigerians. On no account should we allow a situation where we inadvertently facilitate the continued rule of PDP in anyway. To that extent, therefore your aspiration to contest the 2015 Presidential elections must be discouraged because of two fundamental reasons:
a)    The first is that the same altruistic reasons driving your aspirations will not regulate the structures of your campaign and would not be able to fight against the emergence of greedy and corrupt politicians who will be embraced by you and supported to win the elections.
b)    The second reason is that your aspiration would blur our peoples’ vision as they will not be able to see beyond you.
Sad as it may seem, and probably unpalatable as it may seem, I must therefore submit that our society will benefit more without your aspirations for 2015. In the circumstance, it is my hope that you will consider changing your role to that of leading the negotiation process towards strengthening the capacity of opposition parties in Nigeria. Events in nearby Senegal should serve as a source of inspiration. To strengthen opposition parties in Nigeria would require a strategy that would throw up completely new candidates at all levels in 2015, including especially the Presidential elections. Your moral authority to serve as the facilitator of this will engrave your name in the sands of Nigerian history as one nationalist who sacrificed everything, including his personal aspirations and ambition to ensure that the monster called PDP is defeated.
I am convinced that members of CPC who are pushing you to contest don’t wish you well and you should not listen to them. In the event that you listen to them and contest the 2015 elections, in the manner you did in 2003, 2007 and 2011, history and future generations of Nigerians will be justified if they turned out not to be kind to you. In fact, for those of us in the North, we will be justified to be aggrieved with your decision, especially given the quality of leadership your aspirations has nurtured and imposed on our people at other lower levels.
My conclusion therefore is to remain a member of the ACN in spite of my respect for you. In remaining a member of the ACN, I am conscious of the challenges facing all of us in the North. Part of it includes the fact that arising from my inability to join your party, I will remain a political orphan in my constituency with greater probability that my candidature will not attract your support no matter his/her credential and therefore may not win election. Unfortunately, my party (ACN) leadership at national level appears to be operating in a comfort zone and as a result may only start prioritizing the development of my party structures in my constituency when it is too late.
Admittedly, I must recognize that the problem of administrative incompetence and political naivety, which define your party, CPC, also gets manifested in different ways in my party, the ACN. One of the ways it gets manifested is the inability to recruit new membership in other parts of the country outside South West and Edo. While it is a reflection of the failings of many of us from outside the South West and Edo to encourage and nurture positive disposition towards the development of party structures, it must be recognized that the dominant approach is to look in the direction of aggrieved politicians in PDP who may have resources to expend in the development of structures of the party.
This is a fundamental problem because what it means is that our opposition parties in Nigeria, inclusive of your CPC and my ACN, share the same political culture with the PDP, culture which you aptly describe in your 1983 coup speech as resulting in problems of indiscipline and mismanagement of resources thereby leading to loss of confidence. Therefore, at this stage, what should occupy our attention is not individual aspirations but that of doing the hard introspective, reflective and proactive work of sanitizing our parties, such that they are distinctively different from the PDP and in 2015, without you contesting for the Presidency, a credible Nigerian can be thrown up. In addition, with your towering charisma, you are the best person positioned by history to facilitate the unity of all opposition parties in the contest for 2015.
The element requiring the unity of opposition parties must not be taken for granted, especially with the experience of 2011 where information available to the public was that CPC/ACN failed because Pastor Tunde Bakare, your running mate, refused to accept to step down. I am convinced that it was your tacit prodding that encouraged Pastor Tunde Bakare to adopt a hard line stance and refused to consider making the much needed sacrifice. I am also tempted to argue that it was your towering charisma that gave Pastor Bakare the courage and cover to be able to undermine a patriotic national calling of the time.
Many would also emphasize the point that my ACN national leadership also undermined the patriotic national calling of that time by failing to forgo their demand for the substitution of Pastor Tunde Bakare with their nominee. These are all true but very convenient arguments. My position is that the alliance couldn’t have worked out because of two factors. I believe the parties negotiating the alliance (CPC/ACN) were not deeply committed to the negotiations and to that extent hardly see the negotiation in terms of defining the kind of government that would have taken over from the PDP. In other words, and this is the second issue, if there were discussions of governance programmes, they were only secondary. As a result, the main focus was just the 2011 elections.
This leads me to a more substantive issue, which informs my objection to your aspiration to contest for President. To the ordinary people, their belief is that if you win the Presidency you will be able to fight against corruption and injustice in the country. Given the configuration of your party CPC and all those directly driving your campaigns and aspirations, it is debatable if you can be able to fight any ill in the Nigerian society, not least corruption as a President. This is the crux of the matter and all those who are quick to cite your performance as Head of State between January 1984 and August 1985, should ask themselves the following questions: does your campaign team and current CPC leaders share your vision and have any commitment to fighting corruption? Do they even have any difference with the PDP you are fighting? Can you be able to replicate the same governance policies and approaches under the 1999 constitution as amended?
As my elder and leader, I will urge you to sincerely answer these questions. I am convinced that given your honestly will not allow your personal aspiration to influence your answer. I am also convinced that your aspiration is more challenging for those of us in the North. Therefore, I must admit that your aspiration also means a challenge for the political survival of many of us in the North. Without any doubt, it also raises question about the capacity of politicians in the North to assert their independence. Rather than follow the bandwagon, I draw inspiration from Mallam Aminu Kano’s 1950 Memo where he proclaimed that “I have seen the light in the far horizon and I intend to march into full cycle, either alone or with anybody.” The task, therefore, for many of us from the North who genuinely want to move our nation and society forward, is to be able to follow the direction of the far horizon and march towards the full cycle. Whether it is a journey we will make alone or with other fellow patriots, it is a task that is necessary and politically obligatory for our survival. I do hope you will reconsider your decision and give us leadership in this journey. Otherwise, as your loyal children, we have learned the appropriate lesson – go against the current in the service of fatherland!

Buhari/Tinubu On A Joint Ticket 2015 Election? By Sunday Njokede


Buhari and Tinubu
By Sunday Njokede
My crystal ball tells me that ex-president Buhari will contest the 2015 presidential election. The biggest puzzle for now is. Who would be his running mate? Would Mr Buhari’s choose Bola Tinubu the onetime governor of Lagos? Or, would Buhari still field his former running mate Pastor Tunde Bakare?

President Jonathan and PDP would be working tooth and claw. Fasting and praying. Making sure ex-president Buhari commits the blunder of nominating Bola Tinubu as his running mate for 2015 presidential election.

The onetime US president George Bush Jr. had done likewise in 2000 US presidential election. Mr Bush had prayed and hoped to have an “undisciplined” Howard Dean as challenger. Mr Dean was the former Democratic Party front-runner.

President Bush had described Mr Howard Dean the erstwhile governor of Vermont uncomplimentary like this - he: “... was loud, shrill and undisciplined.” I refer you to page 287 line 21 of Mr Bush’s book titled ‘Decision Points.’

The reason President George had wanted to have the former Democratic frontrunner was because he thought he was unmarketable to the people of USA during the 2000 presidential election. Plus, he opined he was a bad market for his Democratic Party as well. With such an opponent Mr Bush had calculated to beat him flat-out and hands down with cakewalk.

Immediately George Bush figured out that Mr Howard Dean was a fall man he could walk over on Election Day – the former president started working tireless for Howard Dean to be nominated by the Democrats. But reverse was the case. Wherefore John Kerry emerged as President Bush contender.

It is the tradition all over the world. Every candidate or political party who is going for election is looking out to have an opponent with questionable behaviours. Rivals with dirty characters are well sought after. In that.  You could beat them with baby-ease in any election before the cock crows.

It is on this ground that Mr Jonathan and PDP would be hustling day and night to make sure Mr Buhari picks Tinubu as his running mate for 2015 presidential election. Everyone is aware that the Lagos rascal is full of corruption and crap. The fisherman from Bayelsa knows as well that the Lagos rascal has more ills on his private account.  That is. The ex-governor from Lagos is a backstabber and a cheap betrayal.  For the avoidance of doubt, go and ask the erstwhile EFCC torchbearer Mr Ribadu. He will tell you how Bola Tinubu and the ACN brought him up and down during 2015 presidential election. Mr Tinubu had quickly turned Mr Ribadu’s boyish smile into a frown in the last minute of 2011 election.

The PDP knows that anything with Tinubu’s name would not fly Nigeria-wide in 2015. Mr Tinubu is no more than a local champion restricted to South West popularity alone. Mr Buhari would be robbing upon himself and sharing in Mr Tinubu’s curse if he goes with him in 2015.

For your information! We are hearing and reading from the grapevine. That ex-president Buhari and Bola Tinubu are readying to do a joint ticket in 2015 presidential election. The news reporting the duos 2015 joint ticket dotted the newspapers few weeks ago.

The question now agitating the minds of every concerned citizen is. Hail Mary! What is it that Buhari and Tinubu have in common that both would be on a joint ticket as president and vice-president respectively in 2015? Sanity and conventional wisdom dictates that. Before any duo agree to duet as running mate on the same platform in any election or contest. Both of them have to have plenty positive and socio-centric things in common going on for them.

To cut a long story short. President Bush’s example should be telling indication to President Buhari. With the caveat that such as Mr Tinubu who has a drag on him are unsalable to the Nigeria electorates. I more so would like to tell other opposition parties to steer off Tinubu however. As we move on closer by each day to 2015 election. The ‘Lagos rascal’ is up to no good. He has a thing with corruption and misdoing which is deeper than the ocean.

My only prayer is that Mr Buhari would not wake up one day. And proclaim that God mandated him in a dream to run with Tinubu in 2015.  The former president had once left us his fans disappointedly ice cold when. Out of nowhere, he told the world he divinely had left President Jonathan to God for cheating and rigging him out of 2015 election.  He had begged God to take revenge on President Jonathan just like that. We had hoped for and expected Buhari to go full hog slugging it out with Jonathan man-to-man in court. What has God got to do with rigged election? If not that man would take his destiny into his own hand.

If God would tell Mr Buhari to choose a running mate, let it be Pastor Tunde Bakare again. A combination of Mr Buhari and Pastor Tunde Bakare during last election drove Jonathan and PDP into panic attack. They are yet to recover from that shock and awe. There is nothing that scares the PDP more than the gathering of decently incorruptible people. And each time credible people are standing election against PDP operatives, they get heart attack. Now that president Buhari has said he is likely to contest 2015, the PDP would need a bypass to mend their broken hearts. Don Williams might be right after all that “some broken hearts never mend.” Mr Buhari should be upping the stake for 2015. So that PDP continue to have heart attack.