Saturday, 25 August 2012

General’s missing daughter strangled by students .

 by Eniola Akinkuotu.

Cynthia Osokogu
Cynthia Osokogu, the only daughter of Major General Frank Osokogu (retd), who reportedly went missing on July 22, 2012, was strangled in a hotel by students in FESTAC, Lagos, PUNCH Metro has learnt.
A senior police officer, who craved anonymity because he was not authorised to speak on the case, said the deceased was drugged, bound hand and foot and then strangled by her assailants.
Osokogu, who was a postgraduate student in Nasarawa, came to Lagos to purchase goods for her boutique.
The deceased was received at the Murtala Muhammed Airport by the students, who later took her to the hotel.
The deceased’s family is based in Jos but she went to her friend’s place in Abuja, where she parked her car before leaving for Lagos.
But the police source said on getting to the hotel, the students used a powerful drug to paralyse her and robbed her of her valuables, including an undisclosed sum of money.
The   source said, “According to the confession obtained from two of the suspects, they met the deceased on the internet and lured her to Lagos to purchase goods at a cheaper rate.
 “On getting to the airport in Lagos, the suspects took her to a hotel, drugged her, and bound her by hand and foot. They confessed to inflicting pains on her and strangling her before stealing her money, phone and identity card.
“The suspects confessed that their modus operandi is to lure young females to Lagos for such purpose. They said they had done it before.”
Our source said when Osokogu’s corpse was discovered by employees of the hotel, the matter was reported to the police but because her phones and identity card had been stolen, there was no way the police could ascertain her identity so her corpse was moved to Isolo General Hospital.
Our source said there were indications that an employee of the unnamed hotel was complicit and had been arrested.
He added that the pharmacist, who gave the rare drug which was used to paralyse the deceased, had been arrested as well and was suspected to be a member of the syndicate.
The police source said the case was reported at the Area E command a few weeks ago but the police only began to make headway recently when they received CCTV footage of the suspects entering the room with the victim.
The source said the police embarked on an undercover operation which led them to Ogun State to arrest one of the suspects.
“The last suspect was arrested at about 3am on Tuesday and we have almost completed investigations. However, only two of the suspects have confessed,” the source said.
When contacted, the spokesperson for the state police command, Ngozi Braide, said she could not comment on the issue.
She said, “The Commissioner of Police for the state Police command, Mr. Umar Manko, will hold a press briefing on Wednesday (today) on the issue.
“The girl was killed but all details will be disclosed during the briefing,” she said

‘Whither Igbo President In 2015, Hold Ohanaeze Responsible’ .


OKECHUKWU-PIX
NATIONAL Publicity Secretary of the Conference of Nigeria Political Parties (CNPP) and Enugu State governorship candidate of the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) in last year’s general election, Mr. Osita Okechukwu, spoke on the alleged pact between the leadership of Ohanaeze Ndigbo and President Goodluck Jonathan last year, the possibility of Igbo Presidency in 2015, the planned alliance between the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) and CPC ahead the 2015 elections and other topical issues.
As we approach the 2015 general elections, what are the chances of Ndigbo producing the president?
The chance of a president of Igbo extraction is very remote, for the Igbo have put all their eggs in one basket.
Don’t forget the old proverb that warned against putting all your eggs in one basket.
What do you mean by putting all their eggs in one basket?
I mean that in the run up to last year’s general elections, almost all Igbo politicians were canvassing for votes for Jonathan.
It was a heavy mobilisation, even members of All Progressive Grand Alliance (APGA), who are normally our allies, got involved, with Governor Peter Obi leading the squad.
I remember vividly how we made efforts to get Ndigbo to vote for Gen. Muhammadu Buhari. We narrated the impeccable qualities of Buhari, as a man of integrity, who will wage a relentless war against corruption and will revamp our decayed infrastructures.
The answer we received was that Ndigbo had decided to vote for Jonathan, who will in turn hand over to a president of Igbo extraction in 2015.
Are you saying that the President really made such promise to Ndigbo?
What I am saying is that the leadership of Ohanaeze Ndigbo told our people that it would be our turn after Jonathan. They made the assertion of a pact with Jonathan and his managers in private and public meeting.
Frankly, the leadership of Ohanaeze Ndigbo must answer this question. They are in a better position to know whether the deal they struck on our behalf is realisable.
I remember one town hall meeting at Presidential Hotel, Enugu in August 2010, organised by elder statesman and former Minister of Aviation, Chief Mbazulike Amechi, Chief Emmanuel Iwuanyanwu and others, where they repeatedly promised the audience that any Igbo man who wants to witness a president of Igbo extraction in 2015 should vote for Jonathan. It was a chorus in Igbo land.
We warned against the dosage of propaganda at the time.
Was the agreement cast in stone?
All agreement must not be written in black and white or as you said, cast in stone. It is like a gentleman’s agreement, but this does not mean it should be revoked, for the Igbos canvassed and voted massively for Jonathan.
One easily recalls how I was shouted down in a public debate of governorship candidates, organised by the Catholic Church at Holy Ghost Cathedral in Enugu when I called on them to vote for Buhari.
One man came up to me after the speech and advised me not to mention any other candidate except Jonathan in any other forum during my campaign.
But the President has not told anybody that he will be running in 2015, which does not forecloses the chances of Ndigbo?
The body language of the President shows that he is running. For example, during the Northwest Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) meeting late last year, a group of youths stormed the venue with posters depicting the Vice President Namadi Sambo as a presidential candidate.
The next day, the office of the Vice President did not only distanced their boss from the incident, but also they disowned the posters and dubbed the printers of the posters as jesters and evil men.
Secondly, in the suit instituted at the Federal High Court in Abuja by Chijioke Njoku challenging the validity of Jonathan to contest for president in 2015, the lawyers of the President are seriously defending his inalienable right to contest in 2015. The lawyers cannot be defending him for fun.
Chief Edwin Clark, former Minister of Information and elder statesman and one of the great supporters of Jonathan is already in an advanced stage of the campaign.
These are a few of the signposts that show that Jonathan is warming up seriously for 2015.
If he is running, can’t someone contest the primary against him?
Have you heard any member of PDP member declaring his/her intention to run, even former Vice President, Alhaji Abubakar Atiku?
There is no law that says that nobody can contest the primary against him. However, Nigerians are copycats and the argument will be that the incumbent doesn’t contest primary.
Conversely, it is not easy to defeat an incumbent in an intra-party election, more so when he is the leader of the party.
What are the options left for Ndigbo to actualise the long dream of producing a president of Igbo extraction in Nigeria?
The only viable option left for Ndigbo is to join forces with the move to form a granite coalition by progressive forces in the country represented by the ACN, CPC and other progressive elements in other political parties.
There will be level playing field in the coalition, unlike the PDP, where the candidate is already known.
Do you think Buhari and Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu would allow others to come in and pick up the ticket?
Buhari and Tinubu are more concerned about building a granite coalition to save Nigeria from the stranglehold and grip of the PDP. The leadership of the coalition is aware that Nigeria cannot claim to practise democracy if there is no regime change.
It is regime change, which Ghana and other countries are basking on. It is glorious to defeat the incumbent, and the world will jubilate with Nigeria.
They do not want the mistake we made last year to repeat itself. There will be no miscarriage this time.
Are you saying that our democracy is still fledgling?
Regime change is the spice of liberal democracy, as against one-party ruling for 60 years.
The day PDP will be defeated in a presidential election will be the day Nigeria will be said to have completed the transition to full democracy, not civil rule.
The defeat of PDP will usher in free and fair elections, transparency and accountability in governance and delivery of public good and safety net.
Is PDP not delivering these to Nigerians?
What I am saying is that if PDP is defeated in 2015, the party that comes to power must perform and must not repeat the culture of impunity, monumental corruption and abuse of power, which is the metaphor of the PDP.
Lets come back to the quest of Ndigbo to produce a president. With PDP producing most Igbo legislators, councilors and governors, how do you think the granite coalition would win in the Southeast?
An election in liberal democracy serves two fundamental purposes- it confers powers on the electorate to choose their leaders, especially if there is free and fair election, and it is a referendum on the incumbent.
Since after the civil war, I have never seen the Igbos unite for common purpose and jointly fight together, like they did in supporting Jonathan for president. They went out of their way and raked up votes from every available register, to the extent that a state like Imo, where Jonathan scored 1.3million votes, recorded below 800,000 from all the candidates for governorship, same in other Southeast states. It was bumper harvest.
One does not think Ndigbo will reward Jonathan with votes if he reneges from an agreement he had with them.
How would the Igbo be compensated for voting en masse for Jonathan?
Permit me to refer you back to Chief Ralph Uwechue and other leaders of the Ohanaeze Ndigbo, who were the ones that conveyed the promise of turn-by-turn in 2015.
They went ahead to list, not only the handover of the presidency to an Igbo in 2015, but also that other juicy promises, like the Second Niger Bridge, Coal-Fired Power Plant, etc would be realised.
Some Igbo leaders have denied knowledge of such promise. So, can anyone vouch for the sincerity of such pact?
This pact was made and proclaimed at several fora, sometimes in hush tones, reminding you that the deal should remain secret until an opportune time.
Some might deny the deal, especially now that it seems a pipe dream, as far as PDP is concerned. I mentioned to you a town hall meeting where this carrot was openly canvassed.
The Ohanaeze leadership should be held culpable, if at the end of the day nothing good comes out of the deal.
Outside who becomes president and who occupies other offices, what other tangibles differentiates the granite coalition you mentioned from PDP?
Ideologically, we are centre of the left. That is why we talk of progressives. We believe that government has business in business and we must invest our resources to revamp our decayed infrastructure. That is to say that public sector must invest in our infrastructure.
We cannot make the mistake of waiting for the private sector, until one of the busiest roads in the country collapsed, in this instance, the Benin-Lagos and Lagos-Sagamu.
What is the role of the private sector in the picture you painted?
We welcome the private sector. However, we are not going to wait for them, like PDP waited for the private sector. We are aware that 90 per cent of all those who call themselves captains of industry have no industry, even pure water factory. They are captains of industry without factories; their industry is the foreign exchange market.
Our economic landscape is primitive economy and the veritable growth must come from transparent state capitalism. Charity must begin at home. If you show seriousness, foreign investors will come.
Don’t forget that Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, as a President, going by the late Gani Fawehinmi records, made over 400 trips abroad looking for foreign investors and nothing commensurate came out of them, because he left everything in the hope.
We must also remind ourselves that all those tunnels and 10 line road lanes in Europe and North America were constructed by the public sector and up to date, they still subsidise agriculture and other essential items.

How Jonathan spoils Niger Delta Warlords.

PMnews.

America’s Wall Street Journal today revealed the mind-boggling million dollar sums that the Nigerian government has been paying Niger Delta warlords to keep them off the oil pipelines in the past 12 months.
Asari Dokubo
Mr. Dokubo Asari, the former warlord that first shot to national limelight collects $9million every year to keep his estimated 4000 soldiers at bay. ‘General’ Ateke Toms and ‘General‘ Ebikabowei Boyloaf Victor Ben collect $3.5million apiece while General Government Tompolo Ekpumopolo is the most priced of all: he gets $22.5 million yearly.The newspaper said the figures were gotten from senior officials of the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation, which makes the payment direct to these warlords.
While Dokubo shrugged off the huge payment he receives, about N1.44 billion, as nothing unusual, there is the belief that the selective payments have bred some jealousy among other militants, not so rewarded, who in reaction continue to pillage Nigeria’s crude oil pipelines. Nigeria loses no less than 10 per cent of its crude production to oil thieves on prowl in the Niger Delta, despite the programme of pacification called the Amnesty Programme.
By Shell’s account, no less than 150,000 barrels of Nigeria’s production are stolen daily, a very low estimate in the eyes of many Niger Delta watchers.
The Wall Street Journal said in its report that government plans to spend $450 million on the amnesty programme this year alone, despite the increasing theft of crude in the region.
Said the respected journal: The gilded pacification campaign is offered up by the government as a success story. But others say the program, including a 2009 amnesty, has sent young men in Nigeria’s turbulent delta a different message: that militancy promises more rewards than risks.

Why insecurity thrives in Nigeria, by Tinubu.


By .
Asiwaju Tinubu in Washington DC on Wednesday Asiwaju Tinubu in Washington DC on Wednesday

The National Leader of the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN),Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, yesterday in Chicago, USA, blamed the current spate of insecurity in the country on the reluctance of the Federal Government to share security responsibility with the nation’s constituent parts.
This monopolisation of security control, he said in a paper entitled ‘Nigerian and the Search for True Federalism,’ has turned Nigeria into “one of the most dangerous places on earth.”
Citing the Boko Haram menace, Asiwaju Tinubu said: “Because it wants to acquire power and not lose any, the national government has adamantly opposed any decentralisation of internal security. The result has been that Nigeria is becoming one of the most dangerous places on earth. Not only do we have Boko Haram, there is growing insecurity and blatant unchecked criminality in other parts of the nation.
“The roots of these security challenges have mostly local origins. A centralised structure, however, tends to deploy security officials and units with insufficient knowledge and understanding of local issues.
“ Instead of helping, the security personnel often worsen the situation because of their lack of knowledge. Community policing has proven effective in many different social conditions around the world. It is an idea whose time has come for Nigeria. However, it cannot be applied purposefully under the current security structure. Thus, our security apparatus remains big but uninformed.”
He said while Nigeria is supposed to be practising democracy the PDP-led Federal Government still exhibits military authoritarianism, hence “this slack adherence to good governance.”
“Nigeria has been unable to progress toward economic development or consolidation of democracy. Our dreams of a great and robust nation remain in the realm of sleep. The nation has been placed on indefinite hold. We are like the ambivalent person, standing half in the light, half in the shadows. Everyday, we hope her great potential will dawn in its fullness. What transpires is the opposite. Those entrusted with her governance connive to pull her back into the night.
“Nigeria has been run like a closely held private corporation with a revolving ownership. While the leaders have changed, one theme remains constant. Those who run the corporation do so for their sole benefit. We must replace this selfish dynamic with one of greater public purpose.” 
He cited the creation by the Federal Government of the Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF),  saying “ the federal government has taken the money belonging to states without the express or tacit consent of the states. The legislation passed by the National Assembly is a nullity and an ineffective cover for a blatant violation of the constitution. 
“ In other words, it is a fiscal brigandage, a daylight robbery. I have no qualms with the Federal Government using its money to establish an SWF.  I have no qualms with states volunteering to participate in such a venture like it obtains here in the United States. That is their prerogative. I sharply oppose federal seizure of funds from unwilling states for the seizure amounts to nothing more than an illegal taking. I fear this is a bitter foretaste of fiscal transgressions to come.  Should this be allowed to stand, what prevents the Federal government from concocting other schemes to siphon more monies from states and local governments?” He also alleged moves by the federal authorities to  undermine the states by proposing “ a proposed constitutional amendment severing the fiscal relationship between state and local government. The amendment would transfer the passage of funds to local governments from the states to the national government in Abuja.  As such, the amendment would make local government dependent on Abuja causing them to turn their backs on their state capitals.  Making local governments susceptible to Abuja’s financial control, the federal government increases its power at the expense of the states.” 
At an earlier town meeting  at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington DC, Asiwaju Tinubu  described the Federal Government  as a giant bureaucracy suffering from elephantiasis.
 “If you decentralise the power of the Federal Government, things will be better in Nigeria,” he said.
 “I suggested to the president to subsidise farming, especially in the North so that Boko Haram will stop recruiting those unemployed that are begging on the streets. If they have jobs, they won’t be going about killing people, and it will improve their nutrition value. Concerning Jos, all the Federal Government needs to do is create another local government for the people.
“You can’t fight corruption because the government itself is corrupt. Majority of the perpetrators made financial contributions to ensure the president wins the election, so he cannot prosecute them. Nigerians are not stupid, they want a change. People no longer believe in the government. Enough of PDP in our lives, they have been tagged as Poverty Development Party.”
Meanwhile, the book,    Financialism: Water from an empty well,  jointly written by Asiwaju Tinubu and Mr. Brian Browne, will be launched today in the USA.
The book details how the financial system drains the economy with emphasis on the recurrent crises, which show that something is profoundly wrong with the global financial system.
The authors say developed and emergent nations have committed the similar sin of turning what should be productive economies into factories of financial speculation that generate more financial paper than they do material  products that real people can use to improve their living conditions.
They are also of the view that the underlying problem is that many who call themselves capitalists have lost their way.

N5,000 Note: Nigerians say ‘No’.

By Michael Eboh
Plans by the Central Bank of Nigeria to restructure the country’s currencies, especially the introduction of N5,000 note, will facilitate corruption, promote money laundering and increase financing of terrorist activities, say stakeholders in the financial sector.
The stakeholders, who spoke to Saturday Vanguard, yesterday, said the introduction of the N5,000 note would adversely affect the economy and have a ripple effect on the populace.
“I hope the new N5000 note is NOT another policy somersault? With steps already taken by CBN itself to address money laundering in the country such as Know-Your-Customers, re-validation of banks’ customers and the on going cashless Lagos, one wonders if the proposed higher denomination of N5000 will not undermine that effort, coupled with our inability to discover and disrupt terrorism financing,” said Mr. Tunde Salman, a financial analyst.

He advised the CBN to delay the introduction of the higher note, until the year 2020, stating that, “What we needed now is how to replace the polymer notes (N5, N10, N20, and N50) that seemed not to have secondhand value in terms of durability
“If, however, they are desirous of introducing the N5000 note, I think the CBN can wait till year 2020 when we might have achieved that tall dream called 20/2020 for the introduction and elaborate launching.”
Also speaking, Mr. Eghes Eyieyien, Chief Executive Officer, Pharez Consulting, said, “It is clearly a wrong move; it signals the interment of all the currencies which are to be turned into coins and will no doubt induce inflation. The cash culture of Nigerians and our history with such actions point to these facts. The sad thing is that we never seem to learn from history.
”Sanusi is too fixated on being applauded as a ‘Reformer’ such that he would introduce any kind of change for its mere sake. That President Goodluck Jonathan cannot see the destructive impact of Sanusi’s many ill-conceived ideas is perplexing.”
In his own view, Mr. Bismarck Rewane, an economist and Chief Executive Officer, Financial Derivatives Company, FDC, Plc, said, there is no need for a redenomination of the currency, especially with the cashless policy.
He said, “With the cash-less policy, we do not need the high denomination notes as everybody is going cash-less.”
Also speaking, Dr. Samuel Nzekwe, immediate past president, Association of National Accountants of Nigeria, ANAN, said, “The introduction of high denomination would make it possible to carry large sums around. One of the reasons the local currency was depreciating was as a result of the inactive manufacturing sector and the import-oriented nature of the country.
“Most of the commodities consumed in the country were imported from abroad and this is making the currency to lose value.”
Mr Olumide Adegoke, General Manager, Standard Alliance Insurance, said, “The higher note could encourage corruption as it would be easy to carry huge sums within the system.CBN should also be looking at ways of checking inflation.”
Dr Solomon Nyagba, President of the Abuja Chamber of Commerce, Industry, Mines and Agriculture (ABUCCIMA), said, “It is clearly a wrong signal for the economy. Denomination is not the issue, the most important step is to encourage local production which will strengthen the currency and rev up the economy.
“Any economy that is dependent on importation will never be stable no matter the size of the denomination.”
Speaking in the same vein, Mr. Opeyemi Agbaje, Chief Executive Officer, Resource and Trust Company, RTC, Limited, said, “It will also cost money; a cost I find indefensible, given the quite recent notes (polymer etc) introduced by immediate past CBN governor, Soludo. It does seem that unclear motives and logic permeates this proposal.
“I, however, do not accept that there is scientific or econometric evidence to support the position that higher denomination currency automatically, without more, will necessarily result in inflation.
“The only positive argument may be the lower cash processing cost that may be incurred by banks with higher currency denominations. I do not consider this benefit sufficient justification for this seeming diversionary policy.”
However, Special Adviser to the President, National Assembly Matters, Senator Joy Emodi said that the image of three distinguished women on the proposed N5,000 note was an honour for women.
She said, “The move is historic for Nigerian women, as it marks the first time any government, will bestow them with this magnitude of recognition and respect.
“The remembrance of these great women long after their death shows that our roles in times of national challenge will eventually fish us out as heroes or villains.”
However, Mr. David Adonri, Chief Executive Officer, Lambeth Trust & Investment Company Limited, said, “The proposed introduction of higher denominated currencies may reduce the cost of producing currency notes. Fewer notes will be required for high volume transactions.
“Due to high velocity in use of lower denominated currencies, coins can withstand rougher usage and last longer, thus further reducing cost to the monetary authority. However, acceptability of use of coins in the country could pose a major challenge to its reintroduction.
“I am not convinced about the causal relationship between higher denominated currencies and increase in inflation as believed by some critics of the policy. I believe that structural deficiencies in the economy, exacerbated by fiscal indiscipline are the main factors fueling inflation in Nigeria.”
Commenting further, Eyieyien said, “Some examples of Sanusi’s many ill-conceived and inane ideas are: Stopping banks from having Automated Teller Machines, ATMs, in non-branch locations after their huge investments and later reversing the policy at more costs; The “Cash-lite” Lagos fiasco which has seen frequent adjustment of the minimum amounts for withdrawal.
“There is also the AMCON charade that has created an over N4 trillion liability (almost equal to the annual Federal Budget!) through ‘bonds’ that can never be repaid; illegal and unconstitutional Islamic Banking; huge margin of about 2500 basis points between average bank deposit rates and lending rates consequent of CBN’s failed monetary policies and its unwillingness to deal with it.
“Unnecessary confrontation with the National Assembly and failure to submit CBN budget to the law makers through the Minister of Finance, as all 31 government corporations (including the CBN) are required to do per provisions of the Fiscal Responsibility Act, because of Sanusi’s ego and arrogance.
”Derailment of the CBN’s focus by so called ‘interventions’ in non-core statutory functions such as its investment in multi-billion Naira hotel and conference centre projects like that being planned for UNIJOS and Abuja; CBN’s dabbling into issues of fiscal policy through “special funds” thereby usurping the role of Ministry of Finance
”These are just some examples of the very disappointing actions of the CBN under Sanusi which make one wonder why the President is unable to show him the door out of office.”

PRESS RELEASE. The planned restructuring of the Nigerian currency: Our stand!



The Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) has noted, with cautious optimism, the planned restructuring of the Nigerian currency by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). In the publicized announcement by the CBN governor, Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, the Apex Bank shall introduce 5,000 Naira note to the Nigerian polity from the beginning of 2013. In addition, N5, N10, and N20 that have hitherto been currency notes, shall thenceforth be converted to coins.

The CBN governor anchored his argument for a higher denomination on the need to complement the cashless economy policy, as it would drastically reduce the volume of currency in circulation. He opined that some countries, notably Japan, Singapore and Germany with higher denominations of currencies recorded 2.8, 1.1 and -0.7 inflation rates respectively in 2010.

We disagree with this position because, given Nigeria’s struggles with bribery and corruption, this new introduction of higher denomination is antithetical to the much-touted cashless economy. In fact, the era of ‘Ghana-must-go bags’ dwindled with the introduction of the N500 and N1000 notes in the past. It became easier to carry millions of Naira in moderately-sized brief cases and, inexorably, increasing the incidences of high-profile bribery scandals in the polity. Recently, we witnessed the allegations and counter-allegations of solicitation for and receipt of bribe money levied against certain highly influential politicians in the Country. It is axiomatic to infer that those transactions were opaque to the Banking system because of the facilitating ambience of high currency notes. We insist that the introduction of N5000 currency note shall further exacerbate the corruptive tendencies in the Nigerian polity.

Whilst we agree with the CBN that printing of notes is more expensive than minting coins, it is difficult to believe that the solution lies in converting the N5, N10 and N20 notes to coins. First, the cultural values of the Nigerian people do not favor use of coins. The question is: how did we fare with the previous conversion of 50k, N1 and N2 Naira notes to coins? In fact, those currencies tacitly went out of circulation as a result of disuse. Second, with an economy very susceptible to fragile macroeconomic distortions, the tendency is often for the price of goods and services to be at par with the currency notes in circulation. What will invariably happen is the spiraling inflation that may cause further macroeconomic distortions and unwittingly, bringing about political upheavals. Third, the existence of the foregoing scenarios may exacerbate the already polarized Nigerian polity of have’s and have-not’s, with the systematic break-down of the middle class.

The CBN governor was reported to have said that various segments of the Nigerian state shall be encouraged to create avenues for the usage of coins. As plausible as this may sound, the question is: what efforts have been made in the past to mobilize these segments of the State on the usage of coins and what has been the success rate? Furthermore, with the huge mobilization against the pasting of Naira notes on persons at get-together ceremonies, have we succeeded in stamping out this vice? Is it possible to extirpate deep seated cultural practices with hurriedly implemented policies as against allowing structured evolvement vis-à-vis modern realities?

As the enunciators of the Nation’s monetary policy, we are not unaware of the patriotic zeal of the CBN leadership in churning out this latest policy. However, we believe there is the sore need to consider different shades of opinion before making the final draft. In so doing, the matters of State shall not suffer insufficient perspicacity.

God bless Nigeria.

Rotimi Fashakin (Engr.)

National Publicity Secretary, CPC.

Datti Ahmed: The Only Man Who Can Stop Boko Haram .


Dr. Ahmed Datti
By Moyo Fabiyi
Renowned medical doctor and President of the Supreme Council of Sharia in Nigeria, Dr. Ibrahim Datti Ahmed is the only man who can stop Boko Haram hostilities, a Muslim organisation has revealed.
In a passionate letter of appeal to Ahmed, published by Daily Trust newspaper, the Muslim group called on the highly respected Northern leader to “call off the Boko Haram beasts,” adding that the Islamists have done nothing to further Ahmed’s objectives and his Sharia plan for Nigeria.
“Enough is enough. Boko Haram has done nothing to further your objectives and your Sharia plan for Nigeria. Indeed, Boko Haram with their devillish tactics have only painted our noble Deen in bad light,” the group wrote.
It recalled that Ahmed founded the Supreme Council for Sharia in Nigeria with the noble aim of implementing the Sharia Law while nothing that it has been implemented to a great extent in some Northern states, without shedding blood or killing innocent people.
According to the Muslims, before the advent of Boko Haram, the North was reported even in foreign editorials as “the best states for doing business in Nigeria” because of the peace existing in the states then.
The group noted with regret that since the menace of Boko Haram, with their killings, maiming and arson, they have frustrated Christians and Muslims from doing business in the North and they have turned the entire North to a hell on earth.
The Muslims said that Ahmed who has friends across Nigeria including Christians like former President Olusegun Obasanjo, will not be happy to see Boko Haram slaughter any of his friends.
They quoted a letter written by columnist Bala Muhammad published in the Saturday Weekly Trust of 05 May, 2012, “you have spoken. And Nigeria has heard you. Indeed, you have every right to be angry and frustrated. Your single-minded initiative to intervene in this ongoing national calamity was unprecedented.”
Muhammad recalled that some years back, a former Nigerian president said this of Ahmed: “Is it the same Dr. I. D. Ahmed that I know? That brilliant University of Ibadan-trained medical doctor, one of the North’s first? The Dr. Ahmed I know to be a core nationalist and patriot? What got into him to become a religious fanatic?” He acknowledge Ahmed as a Muslim leader who cannot be bribed or compromised.
Quoting several religious activities and utterances of Ahmed that made him a trustworthy Muslim leader, the group wrote: “please, we Nigerians, we Muslims, we beg you, call off Boko Haram.”
Meanwhile, the Leadership newspaper has reported the readiness of Boko Haram members to cease fire on two conditions after years of frequent bomb attacks on security formations, religious houses and killings of innocent citizens within the northern states.
The group has named the president of the Supreme Council for Sharia in Nigeria, Sheik Ahmed Datti, as their mediator. It said the choice of Datti was based on the fact that its former leader, the late Mohammed Yusuf, served as a member that represented Borno State in the council of Sharia in Nigeria, and that the cleric could be trusted not to betray the confidence reposed in him to speak for the Boko Haram sect, a source close to the group told LEADERSHIP yesterday.
The source added that Boko Haram was ever ready to stop the bombings in the next four weeks only if the Federal Government would release all its arrested members as well as guarantee the security and safety of all members whose names would be given to the federal government through Datti.
The source said: “What the boko haram sect is asking the Federal Government now is to give them the assurance that once they come to the public after the hostilities, their safety and security would be guaranteed.
“The sect members have also agreed that once the two conditions are met, within four weeks, they will put an end to the hostilities. I am afraid, the members of the Boko Haram sect may resume to more action should the Federal Government fail to heed the conditions.”