Sunday, 9 September 2012

The Revelation of The Good Man Inside President Goodluck Jonathan ~ Japheth J Omojuwa.



The job of the Nigerian president could be the easiest. Nigerians of the current dominant generation – the one of my father – have very low expectations of public officers. Theirs is the generation that expects every project no matter how small, to be commissioned by often small minded political office holders. Little wonder then, that their generation permits a Governor who fixes public goods with public money stamp his face on same as though it were a private gift. In the case of Goodluck Jonathan, greatness was at his feet, fate had indeed set him up to be the next African great man. Jonathan is like a man who was offered a tool of greatness – that is power – but instead got consumed by the tool. For many, holding a public office is a dream come true, but for real men and women with a determination to make the world a better place, holding an office is the key to making dreams come true.
What took Jonathan from the heights of public goodwill as he had in the post Yar’ Adua Saudi Arabian mal-odyssey to the depths of arguably the most senseless thing ever done by a Nigerian president – stopping the music of the nation’s New Year festivities by halving the worth of each citizen in one fell swoop on the one day apart from Christmas and Sallah it should never be done? The last of Jonathan’s goodwill crashed like the pulverization of iodine never to be seen again because goodwill often times is like a mirror, once it hits the ground and crashes, fixing it is futile because like Humpty Dumpty it will not be the same again. If Nigerians were pulled into one flesh and made into one man, that man would be mostly swayed by emotional arguments than by mental ones. Nigerians are a hugely sentimental people. The makers of Jonathan saw that and banked on it. From arranged bomb blasts in Abuja on Independence Day 2010 to the carefully planned Bring Back the Book Campaign to adverts of the Jonathan who had no shoes as a pupil – pray tell, who amongst this generation had shoes growing up – the campaign found the right message mix and had a lot of oil money to work with and wow, didn’t they literally take over the airwaves. The nation was inundated and we were all shown why we needed to vote “one of our own.” Depending on who you were, the Jonathan makers had a “one of our own” message for you. Straight up, for the Niger Deltan “he is our son” sold out like freedom to enslaved men. To the southerner who was a Muslim, the message of “one of our own” sold in terms of “we must not let the north rule us again” and to the southerner without a Muslim background, “one of our own” came in form of “Northern Muslims must not be allowed to rule us again” because we need “one of our own” there now. To the Northern Christian, “one of our own” of course meant “you don’t want to vote for an Islamist over a Christian brother” and the message worked really well because the Jonathan campaign had carefully defined Gen. Buhari as an Islamist and sadly for his campaign team, the message though wrong, stuck on many a soul without the ability of rationalisation. For those who could not be swayed by the customised “one of our own” message, there was a one size fits all strategy of “Goodluck Jonathan used to be poor like you and a vote for this poor man is a vote for you and your future” which sold out too. In a country of mostly poor people, it was easy to identify with that.
We can then conclude that even though he was obviously helped by INEC, Jonathan in my opinion gathered more votes than anyone else in that election. Whether or not he gathered enough to win out rightly became a strong doubt when he somehow sacked Justice Ayo Salami. At least he became President without the drama of protests as we were forced to do to make him acting president. Like it or not, destiny apart, someone of Jonathan’s mental capacity should be never be found near the presidency except as a swimming pool manager. He rose to office on the sentiments of the poor and his policies as president helped to produce the highest number of poor people this country has ever known – 112 million poor people and counting. The seemingly good man Nigerians thought they voted for came out as his real self from the get go when the first thing he mooted was tenure elongation despite making pronouncements to spend a term and go his way. Soon after that, it was a series of contract awards to the donors of the Jonathan campaign. “At a period of generally high oil prices, about N1.6 trillion was paid as subsidy between January 2007 and June 2010, representing an annual average cost of N460 billion to the federation – i.e. FG and 36 state plus FCT! Why did it become N1.6 trillion (now over N2 trillion) in 2011 alone. What parameters changed? None.” Words off the KPMG report. Jonathan arguably got the poor people’s votes but he felt indebted to vultures in billionaires who funded his campaigns first against Atiku Abubakar, then Gen. Buhari. Was he ever the good man he posed himself to be? The answer is not farfetched; he left Bayelsa State with the same single road as he met it. He was under investigation by Nuhu Ribadu’s EFCC as his wife was apparently the money courier as she still is.
The Nigerian people and the economy paid the price of the Jonathan desperation like “the amount budgeted in 2007 for subsidizing ALL imported refined products (petrol, diesel, kerosene, and aviation fuel) was about N300 billion. In 2011 the amount earmarked was N240 billion – an average of N20 billion a month as FG’s contribution towards the import price subsidy deductions for petrol and kerosene. Diesel had been “deregulated” since 2008” but Dr. Jonathan could care less because as far he was concerned he had reached the peak of his life “President of my country” and it was a case of “Let us enjoy it while it lasts” instead of “Let me pay back this people” whether or not it took a lot of lies and propaganda to get him there, a Jonathan with an intent to serve the people of Nigeria would have become the great man off a sham perception. Deservingly though, the good man that Jonathan never was, never indeed lived beyond the elections. It was finally buried on the 1st of January 2012 and the body will never be found because Nigerians now love to hate Goodluck Jonathan. A Nigerian in discussion with an EU diplomat said President Jonathan was a Niger Deltan president, the EU diplomat corrected her thus “No. Jonathan is an Ijaw President. He is the president of the Ijaw people” and I leave you to make of that what you will. What happened to Jonathan? Nothing, a great First Lady only recently told us “being president does not change who you are. No, it reveals who you are.” Yes, Obama and Jonathan both have something in common, like every man who found wealth and power, these tools of greatness do not re-make you, they just reveal and amplify who you are. This is the revelation of Goodluck Jonathan, though it is sad and pitiful in our sight.

2015: Reviving Opposition Machine.


Even as the dormant Peoples Democratic Movement (PDM) is reportedly bestirring itself ahead of the 2015 polls, political opposition is coalescing or pretending to coalesce to generate sufficient synergy to unhorse the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). Ahead of the impending battle, opposition arrowheads – General Muhammadu Buhari of the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC), Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu of the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), and Dr. Ogbonnaya Onu of the All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP) – are working out an alliance that would probably see the parties presenting common candidates in the 2015 elections. LOUIS ACHI examines the unfolding build-up.
A major problem the opposition political parties have had to contend with since inception of the Fourth Republic is a curious inability to plan ahead and the propensity of shooting themselves on the leg. More often than not, they always waited until the last minute before opening talks for either alliances or mergers. This flawed footing had always played into the happy hands of the ruling party.
But currently, it appears that the leadership of the two main opposition parties, Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) and Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), have resolved to plan ahead of time. The other key opposition party, the All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP), is from all indications stepping up its new warm disposition for alliances or possible mergers.
Recently, the CPC leader and its presidential flag-bearer in the 2011 election, Muhammadu Buhari, visited the ACN leader, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, in Lagos to chart the way forward. That visit was significant in that it was the first of such after the breakdown of the merger talks in the run-up to the April 2011 general election.
Pundits knowledgeable in opposition politics in the country believe that given Buhari’s political trajectory, his early preparations for the 2015 elections is an indication that the opposition wants to get things right this time around. It is significant to note that Buhari did not wait to be courted by other opposition parties. Rather, he is the one who is reaching out to them, which analysts say, it is “a major breakthrough in the opposition’s quest to present a common bloc”.
Though the details of that meeting were not made public then, it nevertheless sends a strong signal to the ruling party that the 2015 elections will definitely not be a tea party. Confirming this position, a source at the meeting recalled some prior history to LEADERSHIP SUNDAY: “You may recall that both Buhari and Tinubu have repeatedly called on the opposition to commence early preparations with a view to forming a strong alliance that will wrest power from the PDP.
As you know, our past experience has shown that late commencement of talks of any sort, be it merger or alliance, adversely hampered the actualisation of a workable alliance among the opposition. Therefore, it is in line with this agenda and the need to actualise the formation of a formidable alliance that would defeat the PDP that the opposition leaders have started contacts among themselves.”
Hurdles Ahead…
Significantly, in the exercise of his right, a certain Prof. Cyriacus Njoku had approached an Abuja High Court, challenging the propriety of President Goodluck Jonathan contesting for the 2015 presidential election. A counter-affidavit filed by the counsel to President Jonathan in the suit pointedly deposed that his client (President Jonathan) was doing his first term in office, a confirmation that the president could still exercise his constitutional right in vying for the office in 2015.
“The 1st defendant (Jonathan) is currently doing his first term of four years in office as the President of Nigeria as provided by the 1999 Constitution as amended. The 1st defendant’s status and position is formidably backed by the 1999 Constitution. The Constitution of Nigeria only makes provisions for a President to contest for not more than two terms of four years each. The Constitution recognises the executive president’s tenure of office to be four years,” the counter-affidavit read in part.
In any case, the Abuja High Court fixed October 18 to determine whether or not President Goodluck Jonathan is eligible to contest the Presidency in 2015. Justice Mudashiru Oniyangi fixed the date of judgement after entertaining arguments from parties to the suit filed by Njoku. Arguing in court, counsel to Jonathan and that of the PDP, Mr. Christopher Paul and Mr. Kelechi Normeh, respectively, contended that the plaintiff failed to disclose any reasonable cause of action that precipitated the suit.
They argued that Jonathan was currently doing his first term of four years in office as the President of Nigeria as provided by the 1999 Constitution as amended.
For good measure, the PDP further maintained that Jonathan had not indicated or announced anywhere whether in words or in writing that he would contest the presidential election in 2015.
Consequently, they insisted that the plaintiff was bereft of the locus to seek such declarative orders against Jonathan.
Meanwhile, the plaintiff who argued through his counsel, Mr Ugochukwu Osuagwu, urged the court to discountenance the preliminary objections by the defendants and decide the case on its merit. Though the presidential spokesman, Dr. Reuben Abati, in a bid to diffuse the tension in the polity, had said that his principal was yet to give thought to 2015 elections, the opposition leaders appear to have read beyond the surface. For them, the cat had already been let out of the bag.
Let the battle begin
For Buhari, this continuous slide to anarchy, represented by the extreme security challenges,  should be contained by the opposition by offering an alternative government. The alleged rigging of the elections by the ruling party, he said, had robbed the polity of good leadership. He, therefore, warned the ruling party that any attempt to rig the 2015 polls, as had been done in the past elections, would lead to disastrous consequences.
His words: “We had decided, together with the party leaders, that by the year 2015, God willing, it’s either the government does justice in the conduct of the elections as always claimed by them or it will be a fierce bloody battle. The magnitude of corruption and insensitivity in Nigeria’s leadership is legendary, but there is a storm of awareness. God willing by 2015 something will happen. They either conduct a free and fair election or they go a very disgraceful way”. Speaking figuratively, the CPC leader had referred to the Federal Government as “the biggest Boko Haram”.
The level of corruption in the government circles, especially the petroleum industry, and the seeming inability of the President to bring the culprits to book, is of great concern also to the opposition. As a one-time Minister of Petroleum Resources, the CPC leader is of the conviction that only a corrupt leadership would watch its appointees commit such crimes without bringing such persons to book. Why the issue should be taken more seriously, the ex-general said, is because the petroleum industry is the live-wire of the nation.
“This kind of thing can only happen under the type of Nigeria’s current leadership. Nowhere in the world can such things happen now, and nowhere in the world can government increase the cost of petroleum product by more than 120 per cent. It is most insensitive. Besides, the air people breathe, the next important thing to them is petroleum products,” the CPC leader further noted.
The time, according to the ACN leader Ahmed Bola Tinubu, does not call for lamentation. Rather, it is time to brace up for action if the situation must change. “We fought for democracy, we won it, they gave it to us and, from 1999 till date, a particular political party is in power and what have we gotten? Lamentation, poverty, lack of motion, sorrow, excuses and lack of development. They should quit. We are tired of lamentation. We must stop complaining; let us come to a market square and confront this government if they are not ready for reform,” the ACN leader charged.
Former governor of Sokoto State, Alhaji Attahiru Bafarawa, a leading light in the opposition camp, is convinced that there is no justice and respect for human dignity in the PDP-controlled Federal Government. The party, he said, is using the agencies of the state to intimidate and force members of the opposition to either join them or abandon their cause.
The former two-time governor on the platform of the All Nigeria Peoples’ Party (ANPP) shares the same aspiration with his other colleagues in the opposition; that it is time the PDP behemoth was cut to size.
Enter the PDM
Even as opposition’s plot thickens, associates of late ex-Chief of Staff, Supreme Headquarters, Maj.-Gen Shehu Musa Yar’Adua, have intensified efforts to revamp his political machinery ahead of the 2015 general election. It can be recalled that the Peoples Democratic Movement (PDM), the political machinery of the late Yar’Adua, a frontline politician of the aborted Third Republic, is one of the political groupings that formed the ruling Peoples Democratic Party(PDP) in 1998.
According to reports, a reluctant former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar has declined open identification with moves to revamp the late Yar’Adua’s political group. But reports disclose that other members, including former Chairman, Board of Trustees (BoT) of the PDP, Chief Tony Anenih, met in Abuja last week to fine tune the new plot. Other top members of the group such as a former Minister of Women Affairs, Mrs. Titi Ajanaku; former governor of old Kaduna State, Alhaji Lawal Kaita, and Ambassador Yahaya Kwande reportedly attended. Still, other attendees were former Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Chief Dubem Onyia; Mrs. Zainab Boni Haruna, wife of former Adamawa State Governor, Mr. Boni Haruna; and A.A. Matawellen Hadeija.
LEADERSHIP SUNDAY further gleaned that although the invitation to attend the meeting was extended to Atiku, he chose to stay away. His reticence is being linked to the role members of the PDM played in 2011 during the PDP presidential primary where the late Yar’Adua’s political associates supported President Goodluck Jonathan against him. The former chairman of the group, Alhaji Farouk Abdulazzi, led the PDM members to support Jonathan’s presidential bid in 2011.  Since then, the group has been inactive.
However, ahead of the expected jostling for the 2015 general election, some PDM members had mooted the idea to revive the group to play an active role in the next elections.
At the group’s last meeting, which took place at the Yar’Adua Centre, a protem national steering committee, headed by Chief Bode Ajewole, was constituted with Mr. Godie Ikechi named secretary of the committee.
Other members of the committee include Senator Abubakar Mhadi, Yar’Adua’s son, Muritala; Dr. Etim Amba, Bashiru Yusuf Ibrahim, Tonye Princewill and Olupunle Ebo. According to a source, the meeting which was also attended by some political heavyweights from the six geo-political zones of the country, discussed issues bordering on politics.
The source further stated that the new PDM is being anchored on the vibrancy and resourcefulness of younger people within the group to enhance the movement’s reinvigoration, complete re-engineering and to make the movement acceptable to Nigerians.
According to a communiqué issued at the end of the meeting and signed by Ikechi, goodwill messages and tributes to the late Yar’Adua were received from members across the 36 states of the federation and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) for his efforts in bringing democracy to Nigeria.
According to the communiqué, members were taken round the bridge at the Yar’Adua Centre, which is a symbol of the uncompleted mission in ensuring unity as well as in bringing democracy and good governance to Nigerians. As part of plans to ensure the revival of the PDM, Ikechi said a national summit would be organised within the last quarter of the year on the theme: “State of the Nation”.
But according to some analysts reading between the lines, Atiku’s reluctance to be openly associated with the new movement is linked to the dangers of a presidency interested in 2015, reading any such move as a threat and moving totally against him.
As events unfold, the emerging consensus is that this is the opposition’s finest opportunity to form government at the centre.
The big question remains; Will the opposition parties agree to work for a common goal? Are they paying attention to grassroots mobilisation, instead of empty media braggadoccio? Will the appropriate candidates be fielded for the elections, instead of kiths and kins of party leaders who have little electoral value? Big questions!

Controversy trails Tinubu’s invitation to Obama party’s convention.


Controversy now trails the recent visit of the former Governor of Lagos State, Senator Bola Ahmed Tinubu to Washington D.C, USA where President Barrack Obama was given a re-run ticket at National Convention of the Democratic Party.
Tinubu was alleged by online newspaper not “Daily Post” that he purchased the invitation card for the event.
It will be recalled that the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) leader’s media aide, Mr. Sunday Dare made a statement earlier last week that Tinubu got a special invitation to attend the Democratic National Convention in the United States of America last Thursday, when President Barack Obama secured his second term ticket.
The statement said, “Tinubu will be at the ring side as the Democratic Party conducts activities that will culminate in the nomination of President Barack Obama as its candidate for the November 2012 presidential elections in the USA.
“Tinubu received a gold card invitation, which is prime; and with this, he will be joined by three other eminent personalities: Governor Kayode Fayemi of Ekiti State; Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly, Adeyemi Ikuforiji; and a former Commissioner for Information and Strategy in Lagos State, Mr Dele Alake.”
But, the online daily newspaper yesterday alleged that Tinubu  paid the sum of $5,000 to have obtained the invitation card.
The Online Publication that quoted a DNC source explained that the invite given to Tinubu was a generic type that similarly went to whoever donated more than $5,000 to the Obama campaign.
The publication further revealed that Tinubu’s invitation card did not come directly from the US President, Barack Obama.
According to the publication, “Obama did not personally extend “a gold card invitation” to Tinubu to attend the Democratic Party convention in Charlotte, North Carolina, in the US.
“The invitation card sent to Tinubu, the former senator from Nigeria, was generic; and it generally goes from the campaign organisation and not personally from President Obama,”
But, a top aide of the former Lagos State governor, who does not want his name to be mentioned, said the controversy was part of the work of critics who have nothing to say against the former governor.
He further affirmed that considering the number of appointments available for Tinubu to attend, he cannot pay just to attend a convention in the United States.
Daily Post.

2015: General Shehu Yar’adua, The Rejuvenation Of PDM Machine And Overview Of The Future Of Democracy In Nigeria.


PREAMBLE
Watching with sadness the sudden and the terrible nosedive our democratic practice has plummeted recently, that even the destiny of our nation as one indivisible nation is being threatened; as a concerned Nigerian who would have lost his life in 2005 due to the part I played in the struggle to thwart the undesired and undemocratic third term agenda of the powers that be at that period and having monitored the ongoing regrouping, re-engineering and realignment of our political structures all aimed at the general elections of 2015, the need to x-ray the ideals and vision of a man that willingly sacrificed his life for the deepening of our democratic values becomes imperative. This study therefore will attempt to unearth the vision of General Yar’Adua and the type of Nigeria he envisaged that made him to sacrificed his life and examine the current efforts that is being made by his erstwhile disciples to rejuvenate and reposition his political machine the Peoples Democratic Movement (PDM): to either reclaim the political soul of Nigeria that it once held in high esteem and guided jealously. As they do this, this study will also attempt to find out if this sudden revival of PDM at this period will lead to democratic emancipation of our country and to critically examine where we have gone wrong politically and proffer solutions where necessary. The study will also attempt the facts on the ongoing efforts to form political blocks visa-via the hope that it will assist Nigerians to chart a new democratic path and culture with a view to safe guarding the indivisibility of Nigeria as a nation which is very indeed is very sacrosanct in our journey to nationhood.
NIGERIA PECULIAR TYPE OF DEMOCRACY
Having said that, let me start with what actually is the meaning of democracy; according to Dictionary.com, democracy is defined as “government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system; a state of society characterized by formal equality of rights and privileges. Its system of democracy ensures that people have a direct say in the country’s affairs. In a democracy, nothing is supposed to matter more than the will of the people”. On the contrary, democracy in Nigeria, can be captured or defined in my own interpretation of our democratic practice as “the government of the corrupt cabal for the corrupt cabal by the corrupt cabal as those privileged to be in any particular government in Nigeria governs the country as if it is an occult society where only those in power are empowered to be the sole beneficiaries of whatever the Government in power can provide. In this regard, the contracts are shared amongst the National Executive Council members with their cohorts at the National level while at the State level, the Chief Executives (Governors) and members of the various State Executive Councils. This type of government which is exclusive in nature, those in power ensure that other common Nigerians that are not privileged to be associated with them are kept at bay by every means possible.
Not minding that we are the sixth largest oil producing country in the world but what do we get in return? Our highways has become dead traps, darkness the lots of our people, hospitals have become consulting centres, schools in a comatose state with half-baked unemployable graduates as its products not minding billions of Naira contracts assumed to be awarded weekly on pages of National Dailies at the National level and State levels without any sign of the execution of any contract or tangible project on the ground. This unfortunate state of our democracy notwithstanding, commendation should go to the Governments of Lagos, Akwa Ibom, Kwara, Rivers, Edo and few others States in the country where the dividends of democracy are delivered to their people.
THE CHALLENGES OF DEMOCRACY IN NIGERIA
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton supporting my definition of governance and democracy in Nigeria stated in one of her visits to Nigeria, “by blaming failed government for Nigeria’s huge poverty gap and urged Africa’s most populous nation to toughen up on corruption and fix a “flawed” electoral system. According to her, the continent’s biggest energy producer and its second biggest economy — should rank among the world’s most important developing nations but its reputation for graft undermined its international standing. “The most immediate source of the disconnect between Nigeria’s wealth and its poverty is a failure of governance at federal, state and local level, Nigeria should be in a position to be part of the G20 but — a big but — the corruption reputation … it is a problem,”.
Renowned social media outlet the Republic Reports in confirming the corrupt rate in the country gave statics how the country’s funds are shared amongst our leaders in its special report titled, “Bombshell: How Nigeria’s Trillions, $44B Public Debts Are Pocketed By 17,500 Top Public Officers & Political Criminals—Reports” to the detriment of over 167 million Nigerians supporting my definition of democracy in Nigeria as the government of the corrupt cabal for the corrupt cabal by the corrupt cabal.
According to recent report by the Central Bank of Nigeria Governor, Mallam Sanusi Sanusi the CBN economic report for the second quarter of 2012 shows that the sum of N988.36 billion was allocated to the 36 state governments and the 774 local government councils in April, May and June 2012, respectively as statutory allocations, VAT receipts and 13% derivation. The question in the minds of many Nigerians is where have all these funds gone to instead the report before many Nigerians is one woe or the other – lack of employment among our teeming graduates, our hospitals turned to mere consulting hospital without adequate equipment thereby making mockery of our nation.
It was said that by the 60s the families of the Royal dynasty of Saudi Arabia were coming to UCH Ibadan to be treated but our late President Musa Yar’Adua died in their hospital not minding what was brought back to the country then, today our first Lady, Dame Jonathan is in a German hospital recuperating, our leaders these days go to India to be treated for mere headache while we are told of billions of Naira been embezzled by public officers on provision of health facilities. On roads billions of Naira is spent almost on weekly basis, the Campaign for Democracy captured it aptly when in its recent report, it stated that South East roads alone claim 1,223 lives in two years as it decries the deplorable condition of Federal Highways within the South-East zone.“Statistics show that out of about 8,750km of federal roads in the country, the South-East has about 3,480km. And only about 980km are motorable, while over 2,500km are death traps and near-to-hell ditches. The bad roads claimed 82 lives in a day, which included 20 school children going on excursion on September 2010 when a fuel-laden tanker exploded at Odumodu-Umunya junction on the Onitsha-Awka-Enugu Road,”. Four quality Lecturers of Igbinedon University died as a trailer coming from Benin, in an attempt to avoid a failed portion on the road, drove on the lane of the oncoming Audi Car, which the lecturers were travelling, forcing it to swerve into Ovia River, near Ekiadolor on 5th September, 2012.
These are the sorrow state of Federal roads in all the regions of the country. Tens of thousands of Nigerians lose their lives and properties yearly due to the deplorable conditions of the roads, while trillions of naira is pocketed by the contractors and their collaborators in government. In every budget, the works ministry is allocated large sums of money and at the end of the year the minister in charge cannot point to how many kilometres of road was built or repaired
IS PDP THE PROBLEM OF DEMOCRACY IN NIGERIA?
According to the Conference of Nigerian Political Parties (CNPP); PDP is the major problem facing Nigeria. The group affirmed this while reacting to the 14 anniversary of the Peoples Democratic Party that the party has failed Nigerians. CNPP further noted said instead of giving excuses, a responsible, responsive and patriotic ruling political party, should have ceased the opportunity of the 14th anniversary for introspection and soul searching; in order to examine how come over 70% of Nigerians today live below poverty line, as against 40% in 1998 and how come Nigerians are not just restive, but are declaring for self- government, hoisting flags and coats of arms?
Whereas, we cannot belabor you with uncountable PDP’s theatre of absurd; it is our considered view that what the Peoples Democratic Party {PDP} is celebrating is its 14th anniversary of locus years. Accordingly, it is incumbent on the party to openly apologize to Nigerians for years of broken promises, failed leadership, and enthronement of corruption and culture of impunity.
To ACN the biggest opposition party in the country, PDP is the cause of all the woes in the country in its recent report. According to the party, “Is it the worrying takeover of the country by sundry armed gangs, killers of all sorts, suicide bombers who have brought Nigeria to the level of strife torn Somalia, as an eminent founder of PDP confessed recently? Is it the state of unemployment that has soared to the extent that tens of thousands of graduates apply for truck drivers post as shown in the Dangote drivers’ recruitment exercise going on at present? Is it in the total breakdown of infrastructures in every sector to the extent that the country has become decay that has made the country a morgue of decayed and obsolete infrastructures? Is it on corruption, which the PDP celebrates as a virtue and has elevated to such height that nothing works in Nigeria again? Is it in election rigging, which sustains the false strength of the PDP and which it had sworn never to depart from? Is it in the unending series of judicial manipulations and all manners of sly acts with which the PDP has defaced our constitution to make it amenable to its wiles and chicanery? Is it on the array of anti-people polices and governmental extortions that have driven Nigerians to the very edges of their existence while leaders of the PDP smile to the bank with stolen loot each passing day? Are Nigerians celebrating that PDP has turned Nigeria into a borderless land of unending misery, ethnic war fare, insecurity and torture?”
2015: THE CHALLENGES AND THREAT OF BREAKUP OF PDP
With threat with many major opposition parties in the country, including the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), All Nigeria People’s Party (ANPP), Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) and others finalising talks over the proposed alliance ahead of 2015 election, amid high expectations, Second Republic governor of Kaduna State, Alhaji Balarabe Musa, affirmed in a chat recently that principal actors in the alliance were more than eager to ensure the ouster of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) from power by the next general election. Musa said he was part of the actors who had been working to ensure a new government takes over power in 2015. “ACN is currently the largest opposition party in Nigeria at the moment. We count on the party to work in unison with other political parties for the good of the opposition.”
In another development it is reported that Chief Olusegun Obasanjo and the former military president, General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida, as well as some sitting governors on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) have perfected plans to float a new political party ahead of the 2015 elections. In the plot, driven mostly by some serving and former governors from the Northern part of the country, Obasanjo is expected to make a statement in mid-2013, stating reasons for power to return to the North in 2015.
REACTIONS
The PDP Publicity Secretary, Chief Metuh stated, “On the unconfirmed reports of possible formation of a break away party from the PDP, let us wait until that happens; we will wait to confirm such stories than react now”
In reaction against the background of alliance talks between the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) and the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) ahead of the 2015 election, a former national chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Senator Barnabas Gemade, has said any gang up against the ruling party will fail. Senator Gemade, who represents Benue State in the Senate, wondered why the PDP would be worried about opposition alliance when it had not worked out in the past, saying “the PDP should not be afraid of the gang up, it is not new.”
Chief Owolabi Salis who contested the office of the National Secretary of the party during its last congress cautions against breaking up PDP as that may crumble the country, “If PDP could break it would also lead to the disintegration of the country because of its weight in the country. It has become a national treasure that deserves careful and cautious management”
SOLUTIONS AS CANVASSED BY PRESIDENT GOODLUCK JONATHAN
In his reaction, President Jonathan told Nigerians that they should be able to utilise the power of the voter card to get rid of bad leaders in government, saying that it was with this in mind that his administration decided to sanitise the electoral process to ensure that the wish of the people prevailed at elections. Speaking during the inauguration of the second edition of the Youth Enterprise with Innovation in Nigeria (YouWin!) for women in the State House, Abuja, on Monday, he explained that it was necessary to reform the electoral process to make it relevant to the people’s aspirations. “We feel that for a political dispensation to be relevant to the people and to endure, the electoral process must be sanitised. The voter card of Nigerians must make them vote out the bad politicians. That is the only way we politicians will be committed and do what is right.“And for that we promised to change the electoral process. We have not reached where we want to go but Nigerians and, indeed, all people that have been monitoring our elections have observed that this is a different face of Nigeria and we will continue to improve on it.”
He expressed his administration’s commitment to tackling corruption even as he observed that those who shout about corruption in the country were some of the most corrupt in the country.
The president noted: “In this country, these days, people talk about corruption. Sometimes those who are corrupt even shout more about corruption but we are tackling it gradually. If you look at the agriculture sector where scandals of procurement of fertilisers and tractors and other scandals were going on, we have stopped that. In the oil sector, we are going to stop it. Gradually, this will thin down. We cannot change the society overnight but we have to take it step by step.”
GENERAL SHEHU YAR’ADUA, THE BEGINNING, ACCOMPLISHMENTS, VISION, MISSION AND DEATH
Having examined the fallacy of the type of democracy we practise in Nigeria, let me now seek for solutions by attending to the main subject of this treatise without hope that it will open our eyes to imbibe the patriotic disposition of this icon of democracy in his arts of bravery and sacrifice. Major General Shehu Musa Yar’Adua fondly called Tafida by his admirers was an accomplished force to reckon in the politics of Nigeria and in death his legacy remain a guide to those who hold and seek political power. He was born on March 5, 1943 to an aristocratic Fulani family in Katsina; his father, late Mallam Musa Yar’Adua, a former Minister for Lagos during the First republic, held the royal title of Mutawalli (custodian of the treasury) of the Katsina Emirate. Late Shehu Yar’Adua, Nigerian soldier, businessman and politician and was the older brother of former Nigerian President Late Umaru Yar’Adua. Trained at the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst in Sandhurst, England and returned from Sandhurst in 1964 as a young Second Lieutenant not long before the Nigerian Civil War broke out.
Major Yar’Adua’s capture of Onitsha in 1967 is regarded as the decisive battle which led to the end of the bloody conflict that consumed millions of lives.
The Civil War had a tremendous impact on Lt. Col. Shehu Yar’Adua. Disheartened by the devastation he witnessed, he recognised the futility of disunity based on ethnicity, region or religion. He understood that a united Nigeria was prerequisite for the nation’s growth and development.
Colonel Shehu Yar’Adua served as Federal Commissioner of Transport in 1976. As Commissioner, he was credited with establishing a blueprint for the development of Nigeria’s transport sector as well as the reorganisation and decongestion of the nation’s ports. Upon the assassination of the revered Head of State, Murtala Mohammed, in 1976, Shehu Yar’Adua was named Chief of Staff, Supreme Headquarters and promoted to the rank of Major-General in the Obasanjo Administration. At just 36 years of age, he was the youngest officer to hold that rank on the entire Continent.
Among his many accomplishments, perhaps most significant was the Administration’s successful conduct of an elections and historic hand over to a democratic rule in 1979. As the first military government to voluntarily hand over power in Africa, Generals Obasanjo and Yar’Adua recognized that the enthronement of democracy in Nigeria was the only way to ensure stability and social harmony in the country
Upon retirement, Yar’Adua joined the business world with emphasis on private sector driven economy and varying interests in publishing, agriculture, manufacturing, oil & Gas and shipping. He co-founded with the Late MKO Abiola Habib Nigeria Bank now KeyStone Bank. He established the Islam in Africa Organisation and served as Chairman of the National Mosque Committee where he oversaw the funding and building of the National Mosque, Abuja.
In April 1978 he was honoured by Katsina people and turbaned as Tafida, a traditional title he inherited from his father.
HIS POLITICS
According to Shehu Yar’Adua, “Public service is service to God. You serve God by serving his creatures”
But the return of a military regime without a firm commitment to handing over to a democratically elected government led General Yar’Adua to join politics. He was prepared to lead the political class through the familiar antics and obstacles set by his former colleagues in uniform. Shehu Yar’Adua was a gifted politician. His grassroots politics were void of ethnic bias and religious or regional sentiment, His organisation, whether PF or SDP or PDM, dominated the political landscape of the country, breaking what he dubbed the siege mentality which had dogged politics since 1914.
His aspiration to become the SDP Presidential flagbearer was inspired by a desire to give this nation the committed and responsible leadership the country so desperately desired and deserved. He advocated a new National Purpose which was designed to enrich lives, inspire patriotic pride and serve the common good of all.
As a Presidential candidate, Yar’Adua continued to break old barriers, beating formidable home-based political opponents and winning elections across the nation to become his party’s nominee. Just when he was poised to win his party’s presidential nomination, his election was annulled and he was banned from further participation.
Without bitterness or rancour, General Yar’Adua devoted himself to playing the role of advisor, mentor and counsellor through new rounds of elections. He continued to steer the country toward democracy as the single most influential politician in the country.
WHY HE DIED FOR NIGERIA -
Always a courageous leader, Yar’Adua stood in the forefront of those who demanded a timely and definite handover date to democratically elected government. Those who sought to perpetuate themselves in power plotted to arrest and jail him and others in order to remove any obstacles that stood on their path.
He was sentenced to life in prison by a military tribunal in 1995, after calling on the Nigerian military government of Gen. Sani Abacha and his Provisional Ruling Council to re-establish civilian rule. He died in captivity on 8 December 1997.
Even when his death sentence was passed, Shehu Yar’Adua’s spirit and determination were not broken. From Kirikiri Prison in 1995, he wrote; “don’t worry too much about me. It is the sacrifice some of us must make for our country to be free”. While in Abakaliki Prison in Ebonyi Statebased on the documentary on the uncompleted Bridge Builder, the famous letter he sent to then President of USA, President Bill Clinton becomes a reference of what a true leader should be, “Mr. President sir, It is becoming very obvious that I and General Olusegun Obasanjo may die in prison but we are not cowed as we are ready to sacrifice our lives for the greatness and future of our country but I plead with you Mr. President not to give up on Nigeria and her people as you must do everything humanly possible to help the country from the hands of the dictator ruling the country at this period to enable our people have freedom and democratise”. I just wonder who other leader was ready to do this for democracy in Nigeria. He died and the country lost a gentleman and a hero, but the structures he built could not be destroyed. The democracy we now enjoy is testimony to Shehu Yar’Adua’s courage and leadership. It is his courage and his leadership that we continue to celebrate.
COMMENTS ON HIM BY OTHER LEADERS
His wife Hajia Asabe Shehu Yar’Adua described her husband as one, who believed in truth, stood by it and died in the pursuant of it. He was a man with a golden heart and he stood and died for one thing: truth.
Governor Martins Elechi from Ebonyi State recalled that it was for the late Yar’Adua at the defunct constituent Assembly that made for the present 13% derivation revenue for the oil producing states. “I was never so close to him but the lives of people permeate the fabrics of the society through the words of those who stand close to them. The late general, founder of Social Democratic Party, (SDP), the party that was determined to make a clean break from the military dispensation, for the period the party was alive, we saw the difference in Nigeria politics.
To late Rt. Hon. Chuba Okadigbo, “Yar adua was a strategist whose strategy was to first of all identify the problem, think out a solution and attack the problem” while to Ambassador Carrington, “Yar adua was a patriot who loved his country and laid down his life for the good of his people and country”
To General Olusegun Obasanjo, “Yar adua was a master strategist of high standards with few words. When he told me he wanted to form a political party I knew something big and good wanted to happen to the country”.
PDM AND THE POLITICS OF NIGERIA
Like a General that he was, the late YarAdua commanded a strong following such, that even in death, he is still being celebrated. This contrasts sharply with our experience in recent history where the memories of some of our leaders are fast being consigned to the dustbin.
But political observers are quick to point at his leadership qualities. This quintessential politician, strategist and manger of men and resources founded a political group-the Peoples Democratic Movement (PDM). He brought his careful planning, organisational skill and adroitness to bear on the group such that in no time, the PDM become a force to be reckoned with politically.
It was, therefore, not much of a surprise to many that in the run up to the 1992 transition programme of the Ibrahim Babangida regime, the Tafida was coasting home to victory in the Social Democratic Party (SDP) primaries before the process was truncated. He, alongside other presidential aspirants, was banned from participating in the election.
Even at that, his PDM structure was instrumental to the emergence of the late Chief M.K.O Abiola as the flagbearer of the SDP. The late Abiola went on to contest the June 12, 1993 presidential election and was presumed to be coasting home to victory until the election was annulled by Gen. Ibrahim Babangida.
By then, the influence of the PDM had become very visible for any student of the politics and power not to note.
But even at that, his political structure-the PDM was reputed to have provided the platform upon which former president Olusegun Obasanjo rode to power in 1999. Indeed, most of the leading members of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) at inception were leading members of the PDM.
Political pundits are quick to point to this as the reason behind the prominent roles some PDM members played in the first term of the Obasanjo presidency. For instance, the former Vice President Atiku Abubakar emerged from the group. There were other members of the PDM who held strategic positions.
Though, it has been many years of his demise, many of his lieutenants still bestride the political space, pulling their own weight too. From North to South, East to West.
Some of them include the former Minister of Works, Chief Tony Anenih, former Lagos State Governor, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, former Presidential Adviser on Women Affairs, Chief (Mrs) Titi Ajanaku and former Chairman, Federal Airport Authority of Nigeria (FAAN).
Others are the former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Amb. Babagana Kingibe, former Minister of Special Duties, chief Yomi Edu and former Minister of State for foreign Affairs, Chief Duben Onyia, just to mention a few.
THE RECENT ATTEMPT TO REJUVENATE THE PDM POLITICAL MACHINE
The PDM a national “consciousness movement”, pioneered by Late General Shehu Musa Yar’adua for the promotion of core ideals of democracy; sustenance of and support for peaceful co-existence among the diverse groups in the country; bridge building among the diverse segments of the country; promotion of good governance and sustainable development of Nigeria though for some time now, it seems that PDM has lost its potency in the political affairs particularly after the first tenure of General Obasanjo Presidency. But on 29th August, 2012 at the Shehu Yar’Adua Centre, Central Business District, Abuja a rejuvenation Meeting of the PDM was held.
The purpose of the meeting according to the communiqué issued at the end of the meeting duly signed by Chief Engr, Godie Ikechi the Secretary of the new Group was to provide a forum for the reunion of old members of the Movement and also bring on-board new members. Delegates from all the 36 States of the Federation and FCT were in attendance. Also present at the meeting were key leaders of the Movement, among who were, Chief Tony Anenih, Alhaji Lawal Kaita, and Ambassador Yahaya Kwande.
The National Steering Committee, the organizers of the meeting was led by Hon. (Chief) Bode Ajewole, Engr. Godie Ikechi, Sen. Abubakar Mahdi, Murtala Shehu Yar’adua, Dr. Etim Amba, Alhaji A. A. Matawallen Hadeija, Chief Ejiofor Onyia, Hon. Dubem Onyia, Dame Titi Ajanoku, Alhaji Bashiru Yusuf Ibrahim, Prince Tonye Princewill and Otumba Olupounle Ebo.
During this meeting, Goodwill messages were presented by eminent members of the Movement from all the Geo-political zones. Representatives of Women and Youths also delivered goodwill messages at the meeting. Contributions from the floor were also received on the way to strengthen the Movement. Tributes were paid to the Late Shehu Musa Yar’adua, the founder of the movement, for the supreme sacrifice he made in furtherance of unity and democracy in Nigeria as well as to other departed leaders of the movement.
The meeting was given a tour of the uncompleted bridge which adorns the lawn of Yar’adua Centre as a testimony to the work that must be done to complete the hanging bridge by reuniting Nigeria and bringing democracy and good governance back to the country.
The Movement presented a road map for its immediate future activities, among which is a proposed National Summit on “The State of the Nation” scheduled to hold in the last quarter of 2012.
The Movement resolved to rekindle among its members the spirit of national unity, promotion of peace and good governance.
One unique feature of the new PDM that was so prominent is that it is the new PDM is being anchored on the vibrancy and resourcefulness of younger Turks within the group to enhance the movement’s reinvigoration, complete re-engineering and to make the movement more acceptable to Nigerians. Notable names said to be the brains behind the re-structuring and re-positioning of PDM are Abia State born master strategist, tactician and seasoned administrator of great repute, Chief Engr Goddie Ikechi who is the protem secretary, Chief Dubem Onyia, one time Foreign Affairs Minister of State and a PDP chieftain from Enugu State, Alhaji Murtala Yar’Adua, first son of the late Shehu Musa Yar’Adua and PDM founder, Mrs Zainab Boni Haruna, former first Lady of Adamawa State, Alhaji Bashir Yusuf, a very salient and lethal political operator and of course the very amiable and charismatic, young politician from Rivers State, Prince Tonye Princewill, fondly called the Prince of Niger Delta Politics.
The new PDM is chaired by Chief Bode whose main weapon and armoury is his infectious humility and readiness to listen attentively and allow a level playing ground for every participant. Alhaji Inuwa Baba, former Chief Protocol Officer under President Olusegun Obasanjo and late Shehu Musa Yar’Adua administrator is also said to be very involved in the process of restoring the PDM to its former enviable status.
This meeting is seen as the most vibrant effort to revive the one time political machine that determines who governs at the centre and the pivotal group that initiated the formation of PDP. It added that the meeting was given the task of re-uniting Nigeria and bringing democracy and good governance back to the country.
The Movement, according to the communiqué, presented a road map for its immediate future activities, among which is a proposed National Summit on “The State of the Nation” scheduled to hold in the last quarter of 2012.
The Movement resolved to rekindle, among its members, the spirit of national unity, promotion of peace and good governance.
ATIKU ABUBAKAR AND PDM
To Atiku Abubakar former Vice President of Nigeria, Shehu Yar’Adua was a Great Leader and the best political leader and thinker in post-independence Nigeria. “I am a good student of the late leader and that my on-going political activism was consistent with what Shehu taught me as he would have done the same things that I am doing. He hated injustice with passion and would have gone to court on these elections”.
The fact remains that Atiku ABUBAKAR in absence of the founder of the group is seen as the arrow head of the group having studied and acted as the Deputy of General Shehu Yar’Adua while alive but a lot insinuation is being read into his absence during this meeting. According to report by Chuks Okocha of ThisDay Newspapers, “Atiku was reportedly absent from the meeting as it was learnt that although the invitation to attend the meeting was extended to Atiku, who was said to be in town on that day, he chose to stay away. It was gathered that Atiku is not happy over the role members of the PDM played in 2011 during the PDP presidential primary where the late Yar’Adua’s political associates supported President Goodluck Jonathan against him. The former chairman of the group, Alhaji Farouk Abdulazzi, led the PDM members to support Jonathan’s presidential bid in 2011.
In the meeting; Alh. Lawal Kaita one time Governor of the old Kaduna State a famous and influential member of the group told members that Atiku could not make it to the meeting due to cold and apologised for his absence while pledging his unalloyed commitment to the group and supporting the view of this elder statesman, Mallam Shehu Garba the Spokesperson for Atiku Abubakar, confirmed to Daily Sun that his boss was aware of the move to revive the group and endorsed the parley. “He wasn’t present there, but he was aware of their meeting and he encouraged them. As you are aware without the PDM, there wouldn’t have been PDP. So, they want to re-invigorate the platform.” But he denied that it had anything to do with Atiku’s presidential ambition. It has nothing to do with his political ambition. PDM is a platform within PDP. My understanding is that they are just trying to resuscitate it to be relevant in PDP”.
Supporting this view, the PDP National Publicity Secretary, Chief Olisa Metuh in his defence of Chief Anenih’s presence at the PDM’s meeting, quoted Anenih as saying that he was there to re-emphasise the oneness of the PDP as a political party. “I have it on good authority that he told them that we don’t have division within the party.” He said the PDP would, this week, re-emphasise to its members the need to steer clear of politics of 2015 at this time in line with the position of the National Executive Committee (NEC) of the party.
THE NEW MISSION OF PDM DEFINED
Was this type of democracy as painted above that General Shehu Yar’Adua died for, of course no; this may be why the revival and rejuvenation of PDM at this time becomes imperative as being the major stakeholder in PDP, the onus lays on them to breathe life back to the party and make it more acceptable to Nigeria and Nigerians.
According to Hon.(Chief) Bode Ajewole Chairman National Steering Committee exposed the new mission of PDM while presenting his speech stated and I quote, “the uncompleted bridge outside this building tells the story and we are all part of that story. it is now our obligation to endeavour to complete the bridge of Nigerian unity finally, let me emphasize here that the Yaradua political family, by tradition can neither be used to antagonize a duly elected seating government, nor become a platform for unguarded and non- constructive criticisms. It is our duty to support, encourage good governance, genuine efforts towards the entrenchment of enduring democracy, transparency, corruption- free and egalitarian society. In the same vein, since PDM is one of the major founding stakeholders of PD, we are all obliged to continue to give maximum support to PDP as our party and its government both at the federal and state levels.
This notwithstanding, we would not hesitate at all times, to express our displeasure and disapproval of any government policy and programme, which in our considered opinion, are not in the best interest of all Nigerians. Above all, we shall promote ideals and policies that will engender national unity and at all times truly demonstrate our commitment to our belief and motto of one indivisible Nigeria as a united entity.
Let me conclude this treatise by quoting a great mind, President Bill Clinton while nominating President Obama as the next President of America on 6th September, 2012, “ To succeed as a leader, the story of your life and service records, your values and beliefs, your conviction and desperation for change must count and drive you beyond puerile partisanship. “And he believes that when you work hard and done well and walk through that doorway of opportunity, you do not slam it shut behind you. No, you reach back and you give other folks the same chances that help you succeed.” A word is enough for the wise!
Eze Chukwuemeka Eze is a Media Consultant based in Port Harcourt,  ezemediaconcept08@rocketmail.com, 08038199163

Saturday, 8 September 2012

Reforming electricity in Nigeria


A bright spark is extinguished

The president’s most vaunted reform is flagging but must be revived


Barth takes a bath
ALTHOUGH Nigeria has almost as many inhabitants as Brazil, it produces only 5% of the electricity. Many Nigerian leaders have tried to boost the state’s power supply, but many more have become rich by obstructing it, earning fees from private generation and stealing official funds meant for new power plants. When he was elected last year, President Goodluck Jonathan promised to make electricity reform his big thing, hoping to transform the lives of millions of Nigerians who have spent decades in the dark.
But the resignation of his power minister on August 28th over a conflict of interest has exposed the rot in a process that seemed to be running relatively smoothly. Bartholomew (“Barth”) Nnaji, a respected technocrat who had been minister of power since last year, was meant to sell six generating companies and 11 distribution companies. Months ago he declared that a firm in which he owns shares held in a trust was involved in the bidding. It is not unusual for Nigerian politicians to engage in business overseen by their office; what is unusual is for any of them to resign.
Mr Nnaji’s supporters say that opponents of privatisation belatedly and unfairly engineered his departure. “Nnaji was the best person for the job,” says an adviser at the presidential task-force on the reform of power. “But he was getting in the way of other interests.”
The minister had certainly made enemies. He took on trade unions opposed to mass job cuts. A key aspect of privatisation is unbundling the Power Holding Company of Nigeria, a bloated and ill-managed monopoly, with thousands of “ghost” workers on the payroll. Two-fifths of the staff are apparently listed as drivers. Mr Nnaji tried for months to negotiate redundancy terms, as otherwise serious investors are unlikely to bid. It remains to be seen whether the unions have won the battle. Privatisation may be delayed.
Mr Nnaji also warred with the vice-president, Namadi Sambo, who owns companies with interests in the public power sector, oversees the government’s national privatisation council and heads a programme to build ten new state power stations that Mr Nnaji hoped to privatise. This may have hastened his departure.
Worrying signs have also emerged over transparency. Watchdogs were at the last minute relegated from being active participants in evaluating bids to observers, says a consultant. Their role is important because firms may win bids with lofty promises but fail to get finance or honour their contracts. This has hampered past privatisations. The current list of bidders is longer than expected and includes many local firms. Preferred bidders may be announced next month.
According to the government, the power sector needs $10 billion of investment a year for at least a decade. Mr Nnaji’s resignation is troubling investors who feel he brought expertise to a process that had previously been paralysed by corruption. Watched by foreign development agencies, eligible bidders have so far been selected in a clean and efficient manner. When a bid from Nigeria’s richest tycoon, Aliko Dangote, arrived apparently minutes late, it was rejected.
Most important for investors, a new tariff system, which will see a gradual increase in electricity prices over the next two years, came into effect in June. It is meant to ensure profitability. President Jonathan imposed the new tariffs despite worries that they would spark mass protests. In January Nigeria came to a standstill when he removed fuel subsidies. He partially reinstated them. This time, taking no chances, he agreed to new electricity subsidies for the poorest households for at least two years. But he no longer has a high-profile power minister to hide behind.

The Economist.

Nigerian Military Moves In To Stop Niger Delta Oil Theft Terrorism: $15,000,000 / 150,000 Barrels Stolen Everyday


Defence authorities say they are matching their worries on growing oil theft in the Niger Delta, through which the nation losses about 150,000 barrels a day, by stepping up the fire power of the Joint Task Force to contain the economic crime.
Experts say the crime costs the nation not less than $4.5 billion annually.
The Chief of Defence Staff, Air Chief Marshal Oluseyi Petinrin, who handed in 10 new gunboats to the JTF, Friday in Port Harcourt, expressed these sentiments to JTF Commander, Brig.-Gen. Tukur Buratai, urging him to to use the boats effectively by ensuring that they were manned by capable hands.
Buratai said the gunboats would “boost the operations of JTF and marine security to fight oil theft in the Niger Delta, [and that] the oil thieves will certainly face rough times with this.”
Mr. Peterin said since the boats were locally built, it meant kudos to the national spirit which expressed faith in local technology and in the creation of job opportunities for citizens.
He did not disclose concrete numbers but said funds used for the purchase of the boats were initially meant for repairs of unserviceable, imported patrol craft in the JTF holding.
“During negotiations for the repairs, it was noted that the cost of repairing a patrol boat could be routed to acquiring locally built ones whose operational reliability would not be in doubt,” Mr. Peterin.
“Based on the foregoing and the express permission of the Commander in Chief, the DHQ decided that new boats were to be built.
“Today, we are commissioning these new boats for enhancing the security of our maritime environment. I urge Nigerians to be patriotic and desist from such acts that will be detrimental to the wellbeing of the nation.’’
Gov Chibuike Amaechi of Rivers State inaugurated the gunboats, and said they would relieve the operational problems faced by JTF.
“As you are aware, our beloved country is facing multiple security challenges, particularly in the maritime environment…have been a source of great concern to the Federal Government, especially the members of the armed forces, who have invested a lot of efforts in curbing this undesirable trend.’’ he said.
NAN


EXCLUSIVE: DANA LICENSE SUSPENSION – THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY By Ayobami Oyalowo


By Ayobami Oyalowo
On June 3rd 2012 at about 4 pm I got a BB message, that a plane came down in a residential area somewhere within a Lagos suburb, I initially dismissed it as another of the usual silly BB messages, especially as our dear NTA was busy showing us the wonders of cassava bread and how the vice president loves to wash down the bread with water from some miserable borehole. But try as I did to ignore the message, my soul was troubled and I had to call a few people and it was finally confirmed that one aircraft actually came down and after about an hour of frantic calls, I got pictures and messages confirming the crash of Dana Air MD 83 with 153 souls on board and yet to be determined number of people who perished while sitting in the homes, some have never been to an airport in their lives, let alone enter an airplane.
So began the horse trading and denials, anger, grieve etc I will not bother you with the history, health or otherwise of the ill fated aircraft, much has already been written about that, what I want to do is bring to your attention salient issues that have been ignored in the cacophony and outright misinformation being peddled by officials of the ministry of aviation and Dana Air.
Firstly experts all agreed that the two engines of an aircraft should not fail at the same time, especially since it has been claimed that the aircraft was in a good condition. The only reason that can be adduced for a double engine failure is problem associated to adulterated fuel. I have been reliably informed that through an informal arrangement, SPG is the main supplier of aviation fuel to local carriers who wish to remain in the good books of the minister for aviation.  Finding from NTSB also prove that the two engines can only fail at the same time if the fuel is adulterated or of low quality. Nigerians, draw your own conclusions.
Since 2002 we have had series of air crashes and if you start to count from the Sky power of Jan 5 2000 until the wing aviation crash of 2008, with six people on board and the plane was not found until about 6 months later, the number of people that died amount to 600, while the number of people that died between 2008 and 2012 was 200. So between 2002 (EAS crash) and 2012 (Dana crash), 800 people have died in the air. This number does not include those that died in the Skypower crash of 2000. There seems to be a spiritual dimension to it, but I will keep that for another day, what is peculiar about all these crashes is that we have been fed with lies, fake reports and deafening silence of complicity by Nigerian officials.
During the senate committee sitting that probed the Borisade and Fani-Kayode’s tenure on aviation, some interesting things were made public. It became a public knowledge that all of the previous air crash reports had been doctored and the only authentic report, usually carried out by NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board) were never made public. It was revealed that both the Sosoliso and ADC crashes were avoidable crashes, while the Bellview plane had a bomb on it. (Let the presidency disprove me and bring out the NTSB report on Bellview).
Also note that Femi Fani Kayode upon his appointment as the Aviation minister, discovered these problems of fake, doctored and inadequate reports on air accidents and that was why he created Accident Investigation Bureau, AIB, an independent accident investigation board, headed by Oduselu. This body had a direct reporting line to the presidency and the minister of aviation; therefore the NCAA cannot tamper with nor interfere with their job. But curiously, Oduselu, the head of the AIB was relieved of his duty six months before the ill fated Dana crash, while the AIB was completely sidelined in the investigation of the DANA crash, the minister; Stella Oduah constituted a kangaroo committee to look into the remote and immediate causes of the accident. How convenient?
It might also interest you, my readers, to know that Dana Air against all standard practice has not paid out compensations to most families of the bereaved as I write, 3 months after the ill fated accident; rather they are in court, actively conniving with the Federal Government of Nigeria to stop the coroner inquest into the accident. I am yet to be aware of any other place in the world where an airliner will be actively blocking an inquest into the cause of a crash of one of their aircraft.
Stella Oduah recently told us that in standard best practice, you don’t withdraw an airliner’s license due to accidents and my investigations agreed with her submission, but what she failed to tell us is that, those other countries have an efficient system, where officials are not bribed, nor do ministers force airlines to buy aviation fuel from their private companies. Standard best practice allows particular airline to continue working, even after an accident because all their fleet are properly managed and the records are made public. But in Nigeria where everything is shrouded in mystery, airlines are normally grounded until proper checks are conducted and investigations are concluded. This was why Sosoliso and ADC were never allowed to fly again in Nigeria. I therefore found it amusing that madam Oduah suddenly remembered standard best practice when the inquest and investigation to Dana crash hasn’t been completed. Standard best practice would have been to pay compensations to the families of the bereaved on time. I dare Madam Stella Oduah to make public the NTSB report if her hands are clean.
Another dangerous thing in our aviation industry is playing politics and giving patronage to a few people without regards to the welfare and safety of the majority. EAS airline was taken over by Jimoh Ibrahim another serial undertaker, but was found to be unsafe and the then minister of aviation, Femi Fani Kayode, withdrew its license and grounded the airline in 2007. Is it not curious that the same Jimoh Ibrahim was suddenly allowed, by the current regime, to take over the national carrier, Virgin Nigeria, later re-branded as Air Nigeria? We are all witnesses to the damage Mr. Ibrahim has wrought on that carrier in just a few years of his take over. How else do you define incompetence, unpatriotic selfishness, greed and official wickedness?
There have been too many crashes in Nigeria, from small planes, choppers to major airliners and we wonder what is happening but it is very clear that the Nigerian officials are as culpable as hell in all these problems. some people have even claimed that it is deliberate blood sacrifice by some powerful people, I can’t confirm that but what I can confirm is that most air accident reports are doctored and the NTSB report ,usually carried out by Americans are never implemented because it often implicated so many powerful people. My candid advice to air traveller is to pray and ask God for protection and avoid travelling on Saturday and Sunday as much as you can. The pattern of major accidents from ADC, Sosoliso, Dana etc has shown that there is a greater risk of an air crash on a weekend than on a weekday.
In conclusion, there is a deliberate cover up in high places on major air crashes in Nigeria and I will like Nigerians to ask Stella Oduah to tell us who supplied the aviation fuel to Dana Air on the fateful flight? Also let them refute the claim that adulterated fuel was responsible for the double engine failure of Dana Air MC Donnell Douglas MD 83 which crashed around Iju Ishaga on June 3 2012. I also want Mrs Oduah to refute the claim that there is an informal arrangement whereby airlines buy fuel mainly from her company, SPG oil. I also want her to tell us if all Nigerian airliners adhered to Global Standard Best Practices and if that was responsible for the following:
1. Delay in payments of compensations to the families of the bereaved.
2. Quashing the coroner inquest on the ill fated Dana Plane crash.
It is a shame to see how we are treated by those who have the oversight to watch over our lives, but some day we shall all appear before the judgement throne of God to be rewarded according to our works. None of us we live forever, but what will be written on your epitaph?
May the soul of the people KILLED by Dana Air plane rest in peace and may all those culpable for deliberately shielding the truth of that crash be haunted perpetually until they breathe their last.