By Soni Daniel
…Says ‘We documented OBJ’s anti-North actions’
In this concluding part of the interview with Prof. Ango Abdullahi, a
former Vice-Chancellor of Ahmadu Bello University (ABU) and spokesman
for Northern Elders Forum (NEF), a think thank for the 19 northern
states, he speaks on the relationship of President Goodluck Jonathan and
Chief Olusegun Obasanjo with the North.
What Alhaji Ahmadu Bello wanted was competetence. He showed this in
the civil service as well as in the politics of the North at the time.
The biggest story people will say about Sardauna’s attitude to good
people was when he saw Ibrahim Imam from Borno State going to lose a
seat in Borno to return to the Northern House of Assembly as an
opposition leader and he was afraid to offend his party-the NPC.
The NPC in Borno insisted that Ibrahim Imam must not come back to
represent them. But the Sardauna wanted Imam back and he had the problem
of either fighting his party for Imam and that would create a major
problem because the governor of the north came from Borno. So he called
Joseph Tarka from Benue State to come to Kaduna but the latter refused
to come initially wondering what he was calling an opposition leader to
come and do in Kaduna. He might have thought he wanted his head being an
opposition figure at the time.
He refused to come and then the Sardauna appealed to the Tor Tiv to
ask Tarka to come and see him in Kaduna and he eventually went to see
him. On arrival in Kaduna, the Sardauna explained to Tarka that he
wanted him to assist in getting Ibrahim Imam to be allowed to continue
in the House of Assembly as the opposition leader. Tarka was shocked.
Tarka told the Sardauna he could allow Imam to contest in Borno and not
in Benue and he said he did not also want any problem with his party.
So, he pleaded with Tarka to give Imam a seat in Benue and he
accepted to give him a constituency in Benue. He contested and won
election there. When Tarka went back to the Tor Tiv, he said he did not
know that the Sardauna was such a wonderful and selfless leader. He was
surprised that the Sardauna still found value in an opposition figure
who nonetheless had so much to offer to the generality of the people.
This is the kind of leader that he was. From that time on, Tarka was an
active contributor to northern unity.
But what actually happened about the divisive thing in the North is
that in our fathers’ days, there was really not much room for tribalism
and religious hatred. Awolowo respected Azikiwe and so on. But what
actually led to weakening the fabric of unity was the creation of states
and, before you realise it, elements of statetism began to creep
in-rivalry among leaders in the various states which was not there began
to creep in but the most potent division which was introduced from
outside was religion. And this was done very well by no other person
than former President Olusegun Obasanjo.
Buhari, IBB and OBJ
How did he do it?
He knocked heads, made pronouncements about the North demonizing the
region and its people and he did not hide it. He even wanted to recruit
Senator Joseph Waku into the demonic campaign of calumny against the
North. Not only did he want to demonise them but he also wanted to
cripple them. Waku was taken aback. He could not help but to remind him
that he was a northerner. He said, ‘No, I am not talking about your
kind. I am talking about Hausa-Fulani’. So whatever pretences Obasanjo
might have had, it is clear that he was a major instrument in the
introduction of divisive tendencies-tribal and religious that weakened
the North as a geopolitical entity.
But Obasanjo can defend himself since there is no concrete evidence to support what you are accusing him of…?
No, no no, there is evidence. For a sitting president to call
somebody to say that he wanted to destroy a certain section of the
country?
But what could the person do about it?
You mean Waku?
Yes.
Yes, he reported to us at a meeting what Obasanjo wanted him to do
against the north and how he reminded him that he was also a
northerner. In response, Obasanjo said he did not mean the Tiv people
but the Hausa-Fulani.
But what do you think Obasanjo would want to achieve by demonising the North and its people?
Obasanjo’s quarrel, I understand has to do with the fact that a
northerner sent him to jail. And that he could easily remove his garment
and show everyone the scars left on him by the beating he got from
northerners. So, all these actions have been properly documented by us.
You remember how he wickedly retired so many military officers from the
North on the grounds that they served as politicians whereas such
postings were purely military assignments. He retired all of them
without caring about their careers and future so that they would not
work against him and his government.
But the retirements affected all parts of the country and not the North alone.
But it affected the North most. The North had the largest number of
military officers retired by Obasanjo. Of course if he did not pronounce
it, he would have had a hiding place. But Obasanjo could not contain
himself. He called somebody-a northerner but nor Hausa-Fulani-to tell
him that he wanted to harm the North and its people and he reminded him
that he was one of them and he quickly said no, not your type but the
Hausa/Fulani people’.
And here is Obasanjo still running around, pretending that he is a
Nigerian leader and that he wants to still impose his wishes on us. But
just like we stopped him from imposing himself on Nigerians through a
third term, we will stop him from any of his imaginations. He succeeded
with imposing the late Umaru Musa Yar’Adua for a simple reason. Umaru
was not a popular northern candidate. He was Obasanjo’s candidate.
But Yar’Adua could have served the interest of the North and Nigeria if he had not died.
No, that is not the point. The reason is that Yar’Adua’s upbringing
is typical of northern leadership of the past, deeply rooted in
selflessness and humility. You can go to Shagari’s village and check
what is there and confirm if he kept anything there for his personal
gratification. He was president of Nigeria but did not do anything for
himself and his village. But he did for other places. This is the
leadership style of the North. We have this culture rooted in our
religious belief that you must do to others first before you do for
yourself.
If you saying Obasanjo weakened the North , why didn’t north confront him since then?
Yes, he did substantially. We did confront him otherwise we would not
have succeeded in stopping third term. He had already bought over the
Igbo into his programme. He was confident of the South West with Bode
George and the rest of them and had already cornered all the PDP
states. It took us a lot of effort outside ACF to stop him. We created
the Northern Union, with Olusola Saraki as the leader and myself as his
deputy to run around, canvassing for support to stop Obasanjo’s third
term and that was how we eventually worked together with people like
Edwin Clark. That was what brought us to Edwin Clark.
You know I wrote Edwin Clark an open letter while he was canvassing
for Jonathan to contest the 2011 election, reminding him of what we did
with him under an arrangement that Obasanjo was a beneficiary of zoning.
I sat with him in Otta and under the constitution he did his first four
years and asked for another term as allowed by law. Obasanjo accepted
it and signed. Audu Ogbe has the list of the 47 persons who attended the
meeting in Otta in 2003. Only four persons refused to sign the zoning
agreement. And Jonathan was there, representing his governor.
He signed as number 37 on behalf of his governor for Obasanjo to do
another four years-that is the North conceding eight years under the
zoning arrangement to the south so that it would take its eight years
after Obasanjo. Obasanjo even tried to exceed the two terms by trying a
third term. He may deny it but everyone knows that the man was working
for a third term by sidelining our constitution. Here is a man who was
the first to say that he was not aware of zoning in PDP.
That was what he said. He said he did not recognize zoning. But what
is most surprising was that when Jonathan was about the contest the 2011
election, he did not know about zoning the Presidency. What we were
quite willing to accept was that since Yar’adua had died prematurely, he
should serve out his remaining term as provided for in the
constitution.
But people running around Jonathan said no and that he is the
custodian of the mandate of Yar’Adua and he should be allowed to run as
if Yar’Adua was not a candidate representing northern interest under the
zoning arrangement reached with Obasanjo and other leaders of Nigeria
in Otta in 2003. So, how could Jonathan then represent us under the
zoning arrangement? He should have stopped at 2007 and for the North to
take on the remaining four years.
But Jonathan went ahead and got the support of some of these
northern lackeys who were running around to get either second term as
governors or ministerial appointments and the like to say that he could
run. They manipulated the congresses and the primaries to his advantage.
Each governor was given a box to return Jonathan otherwise they would
forfeit their four years with a threat that only the party has the power
to submit the names of candidates to the INEC. So the governors
struggled to return Jonathan.
President Jonathan
Could that be the reason why some people say that the North is angry with Jonathan?
Yes, it is true. It is true because Jonathan is untrustworthy; he cannot
keep a promise. There was a promise that the North would do eight years
after Obasanjo. Yar’Adua died midway and they reneged. We had expected
that the North would at least be given back power in 2011. But Jonathan
argued it in his own way and was supported by some northerners who sold
out and pretended that they are were out to protect the interest of the
North and we will expose them at the right time.
But the people you are referring to are top political leaders from
the North who are either governors or ministers and lawmakers who are
playing normal course of politics and I doubt if there is anything
anyone can do to them.
They are playing politics with the interest of their people and they
want the people to respect and support them? Is that what you mean? We
will expose them at the right time. We will. When we reach the point,
you will see their names in the paper.
There is controversy over the onshore/offshore dichotomy, which had
long been laid to rest. Why the renewed agitation by the North?
No, it has not been laid to rest. There is a constitution even though
some say it is not good enough. But it is still there serving the
people of Nigeria.
Under the law, there is a certain distance between land and the
continental shelf and this is what all other countries of the world
apply in the sharing of resource from the sea. They use that law to
decide what should go to the state and the entire country. This was the
case and this is what really should have been the basis upon which the
National Assembly should have based its decision. But the truth is that
what drove the process was corruption.
Who was corrupted?
The National Assembly was influenced by those who were interested in abrogating onshore/offshore dichotomy.
But northerners were also in the National Assembly and they could not
have been induced to work against their collective interest.
They were the ones who were induced and that is why I tell you that
their names will be in the papers very soon. Northern lawmakers sold
out. And this is costing the North at least N20 billion monthly. They
may have been induced but now their selfish action is costing the North
at least N20 billion every month. But where were the governors?
They were there. Where were the members of the North who were serving
in the National Economic Council and others? All the top persons in the
government of Obasanjo from the North are all guilty of selling out the
interest of the north as far as the onshore/offshore dichotomy is
concerned.
But Masari has argued that the action was a national compromise
position to save the country from protracted crisis since the oil
producing states were insisting on revenue for oil taken from as far as
500 feet isobaths.
No it is absolute nonsense because it is still against international
law. They could have adopted another approach and not violate the law.
So what does the North really want concerning the oil law?
Nigeria should comply strictly with the international law of the sea in
sharing oil revenue. That is the position of the North. We should be
able to decide what to do for the environmental degradation done to the
oil producing states by giving those states some level of compensation
above others but not to compromise international law the way we are
doing. But as long as this law is being distorted to serve an interest
that does not appear to be national, then it remains an area of
contention.
Given what you have said about the breach of zoning arrangement by
Jonathan in 2011, will the North want to support him to contest the 2015
election so as to complete his eight years?
Well I will answer that question by asking you to go and see those
governors who supported Jonathan in 2011 and find out whether they are
ready to support him in 2015. I never supported him in 2011 and I am not
going to do so in 2015. The North that I know and belong to did not
support Jonathan in 2011. It is governors who supported him on behalf of
the people of the North and I think that question should be directed to
them.
But what will the North do?
I can assure you that the North will not sit back for 2011 to repeat
itself. That is what I can say at this point in time. We cannot support
someone who reneged on a ‘gentleman agreement’ that disqualified him
from contesting in the election on purely moral grounds. Again, it is
left for Nigerians to judge whether the man has come close to being an
effective president for Nigeria since he took power, whether acting or
substantial. And even on the basis of that I thought that the man should
disqualify himself from seeking an office even if it is legally
feasible for him to do so.
Why should he disqualify himself from seeking office?
He should do so because even those who supported him initially have come
out to say that this is one of the most incompetent presidents that
this country has ever produced. Incompetence is the key word. What has
he done that this country wanted that he has done? Corruption is at its
peak under his leadership and that is why the country is reversing to
the debt trap.
Even Obasanjo left some substantial foreign reserves and virtually
cleared the debt burden of the country before leaving office. But now
the reserves are gone and we are back in debts. Subsidy is at the
forefront of corruption. Over N2.6 trillion gone in the name of oil
subsidy and it is evident that most people who fronted this scam did so
to return most of the money to the electioneering campaign of 2011. Many
of them are anxious to go to court to say so and that is why the
government is reluctant to prosecute them.
So, under this government, you can individualise cases of corruption
and they have not had the courage to convict one person for stealing
public wealth with impunity. And you have this cumulative exhibition of
incompetent president in his pronouncements. When he was in Anambra the
other day, he said, “I have come to my people”. So they are his people
and other states are not his people?
All these crises that have happened in Jos, Maiduguri, or Yobe where
hundreds of people have been killed, Jonathan never showed up even once.
And he is claiming to be president of Nigeria. He has made all manner
of statements that portray him as totally incompetent and totally
unsuitable for a nationalistic disposition. He cannot be the national
leader. And perhaps that is why Obasanjo his godfather has given up on
him and abandoned him to his fate.
Vanguard
