A frontline pro-democracy activist and spokesperson of Save Nigeria Group (SNG), Yinka Odumakin, speaks with DAPO FALADE on issues affecting the development of the South-West, among other issues. Excerpts:

Yinka Odumakin
Given your association with the progressive camp, many people
were surprised by your recent declaration of support for the Labour
Party governorship candidate in the forthcoming election in Ondo State.
What informed your decision?
Well, nothing has changed. I have remained consistent on the progressive
side. It may just be that your definition of progressivism may not be
totally in sync with what progressivism is. A lot of people called
progressives have been going through all kinds of transformation.
First of all, I think there are three key issues involved in the
election coming up in Ondo State. I don’t think it is just about
electing a governor who will rule the state for the next four years. The
election is going to settle many issues in Yoruba politics and Nigeria
generally.
The first issue is that the time has come for the Yoruba
nation to make a choice on what makes you a progressive: is it
performance, label or party card that you carry?
The Yoruba nation also has to decide whether we want to operate on the
template Chief Obafemi Awolowo gave to us – where governance is about
the people taking decisions and leaders stepping forward to lead them in
the desired direction – or a caliphate politics, where the Caliph sits
down and appoints ajeles all over the place who are only answerable to
him.
The last issue about this election, and which concerns Governor
Olusegun Mimiko, is that I have gone round the state and seen what the
man has done in the last three and a half years. I believe that if
somebody has done those kinds of things and put himself forward for
re-election and he is not re-elected, then there is no incentive for
anybody to go to public office and perform again. Everybody can then
say, ‘let me just go there and steal’ and when they steal enough, they
can throw enough money at the people and the people would follow them.
Why are you so passionate about the issues you raised?
These are the cardinal issues that are involved in the Ondo governorship
election. And I am passionate about the caliphate politics which Yoruba
people must stop in its track. I am passionate about returning the
Yoruba nation to the path of development, which is what Mimiko is doing
in Ondo State. Look at the Abiye concept which, today, has become a
benchmark for WHO (World Health Organisation). Not only that; UCH
(University College Hospital), which was established several years back,
now understudies what goes on in Abiye.
I have known Mimiko since 1999 when he represented Ondo State in the
Afenifere political committee and I recalled that in 2003, when he said
he wanted to be governor on the ticket of the Alliance for Democracy
(AD), he gave me a pamphlet on the night of his fund-raising in Lagos.
In that document, he said that his paradigm of governance is not
top-bottom, but bottom-up. Three and a half years in the saddle, he has
proved that he is a governor who works for the people. The Ondo people
follow him because he has worked for them. This shows that people
appreciate those who work for them.
The governor of Lagos State between 1979 and 1983, Alhaji Lateef
Jakande, touched the lives of the people the way no other government
ever did. The effect is still felt even 29 years after he left office.
He did not name anything after himself, but there is no community in
Lagos today where you would not feel his touch. That shows that people
appreciate those who work for them, the way they appreciate Awolowo, who
transformed Yoruba nation into a pacesetter for the whole of Africa.
After Oduduwa, the most venerated individual in Yorubaland today is
Awolowo. Oduduwa is the founder of the Yoruba, but Awolowo is the
progenitor of modern Yoruba nation. That is what Lagos people are doing
to Jakande, 29 years after he left power and that is what Ondo people
are doing to Mimiko.
And that is why today, in spite of all odds, I am sticking out my neck for Mimiko.
But you were part of the system that produced the so-called
caliph in the build-up to the 1999 elections. At what point did you part
ways?
I know that in 1999, when my political leaders and I decided to move
beyond advocacy to engaging in governance and politics, we declared for
AD at Oworonsoki. There, we were received by Chief Ayo Adebanjo, the
late Alhaji Ganiyu Dawodu and many leaders of Afenifere and AD. When the
issue of who would be governor of Lagos State came up, I supported
Senator Bola Tinubu without having met him then. The closest I knew him
was in 1992 through a colleague of mine in the Daily Times who handled
his media campaign when he wanted to run for the Senate.
But when he came back from exile, those of us who played prominent
roles in democracy movement in the country at that time were told
stories of Tinubu’s involvement in NADECO abroad and we felt that a man
who stood up in such a time when most of our colleagues and leaders were
running to the late General Sani Abacha should vie for public office. I
can recall that the first television commercial that announced his
governorship ambition was my concept.
When the governorship primaries were to be held, Afenifere had
committees in each of the six South-West states to decide who was to be
governor. I was part of the committee that went to Ondo. We were the
ones that held the primaries that produced the late Chief Adebayo
Adefarati as AD governorship candidate in the state. By the time we came
back to Lagos, all that happened had happened. As we were coming back
from Ondo, we felt that we should go to the house of our chairman in
Lagos then, Alhaji Dawodu, as we bought some fruits for him as it was
during the Ramadan period.
By the time we got to his house, we didn’t meet him. Then we decided
to go to Ore Close where they normally held caucus meeting. On our way,
we saw him in traffic at Masha area with his friend, the late Mr Ferera.
We flashed and ran after him to give him the report from Ondo. But I
noticed that Alhaji Dawodu was agitated. He just told us to move on. It
was when we got to Ore Close that we learnt that there was a problem in
Lagos; that Alhaji Dawodu had forwarded the name of the late Engineer
Funso Williams to INEC and the leaders were waiting for him to reverse
that decision, but he had made himself unavailable. It was then the
leaders said that Chief Ayo Adebanjo should write to INEC to remove the
name of Williams and replace it with that of Bola Tinubu.
What happened in Lagos; the guideline that was given to us said that
anywhere there is fracas, the electoral panel reserves the right not to
accept the result from such area. Now, there were crises in some local
government areas where Funso Williams was the strongest and based on
that, the electoral panel that came from Oyo State said that it was
going to cancel the result of those areas. If we had accepted the
result, the late Williams won the Lagos primaries; but if you cancel
them, Bola Tinubu won.
That was why the leaders said, ‘well, we are the ones that gave the
guideline, if the people we appointed said they have rejected these
local government areas, we are upholding their verdict’ and this made
Tinubu the winner. It was years after that it was suggested that some
people were fast enough to create those crises in Funso Williams’
strongholds to fulfill that guideline which was a technical thing, but I
think the leaders acted in good faith in accordance with the guideline
and the decision of the panel.
Again, in 2003, when we were meeting in Ijebu-Igbo over the 60:40
thing; that the Tinubu group should take 60 and Dawodu group should take
40 and that was not going to work. Alhaji Dawodu indicated his
intention to form another party and I remember Alhaji Lam Adesina said
that it was unfortunate that we have found ourselves in a situation
where a Ganiyu Dawodu who had won elections for us in the past is now
somebody that is looking for a party to run for an election. What I am
saying in essence is that if Dawodu had insisted that he wanted to
contest governorship election, nothing would have stopped him.
So, when Tinubu became the governor of Lagos State because of his
participation in the struggle, it was a natural thing to continue to
support him. But within a year, by 2000, when the AD was split in two
and he was on Chief Bola Ige’s side and we had only Adefarati and Chief
Segun Osoba on the side of Papa Senator Abraham Adesanya. For some of
us, in spite of our closeness to Tinubu, we supported the leaders and we
were trying to promote efforts to ensure that the house of Afenifere
was not divided. We used our friendship with some members of the Tinubu
group to continue to try to build bridges.
In the course of time, we got to know that the Tinubu agenda was
personal. The first thing I noticed was that, around 2005/06 when Yoruba
were asked to leave Warri and I made a statement on behalf of Afenifere
that no force on earth can displace the Itsekiri from their homeland,
the following day, Tinubu came out to dismiss Afenifere, using some
words to the effect that we are scaremongers. Then, I had to come out to
say that Afenifere was disappointed in him to have made such a comment
when it was in the open that our people have been given seven days to
leave their homeland.
My second worry was when former President Olusegun Obasanjo set up
the Confab in 2005 and I was part of the committee to declare the Yoruba
agenda. We drafted an agenda which was a constellation of all the
positions that Yoruba people have, built up since 1994- parliamentary
system of government, fiscal federalism, regionalism etc- and we had
thought that the only progressive governor that we have who can champion
that agenda was Tinubu. But all of a sudden, he turned against the
Yoruba agenda and not only that, he went to prepare what he called Lagos
agenda and his points men started saying that Lagos is not part of
Yorubaland; that it signed a different treaty with the colonialists. It
was said that some of them were from the Tapa region. It was shocking
and we made all kinds of entreaties but our own man rejected our agenda.
Where we said we want parliamentary system, he said he wanted
presidential; everything Yoruba agreed on, the Tinubu agenda rejected.
It came to a point where Gbenga Daniel (former governor of Ogun
State), whom we had already casted away that he had joined the Peoples
Democratic Party (PDP), was now the one that was carrying the Yoruba
agenda on his head. That was when we realised that there was a gap.
On the issue of third term agenda, all kinds of things happened,
which I will not talk about now, but which also showed that there was a
gap between what he told the public and what he planned to do.
The final straw, for me, was in December 2006. I was part of the
Action Congress (AC) when it started; I went round the South-West to
mobilise for the party and based on that, I also participated in its
national summit. Chief Bisi Akande, Honourable Wale Osun and I drafted
most of what became the constitution, the guideline for elections, how
the delegates and candidates would emerge and the rest. Then, it was
time for primaries within the AD and Governor Tinubu from Lagos shredded
everything we had done and imposed his own. It was at that point that I
said ‘it is enough.’
So, you are now saying that there is nothing democratic in
the structure and operations of the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) led
by Senator Tinubu…
The party, today, is one of the undemocratic parties in the country, as
far as its leadership is concerned. I don’t have any problem with
members of the party, but the leadership is corrosive to our politics.
Don’t forget, the leadership came to Yorubaland under the PRIMROSE Group
under the leadership of the late General Shehu Yar’Adua in 1992 in the
Social Democratic Party (SDP). They were the ones that came and
introduced money politics to Lagos where they ensured that Jakande was
defeated in Lagos by Yar’Adua with illicit money. That was when politics
was destroyed in Yorubaland; before then what we had was politics of
service, development and ideas; members would go to meetings to
contribute to building the party and the party was run democratically.
Money was introduced by the PRIMROSE Group which metamorphosed into
the Dapo Sarumi Group and came back in 1999 to enter Afenifere and then
took over the platform, sidelining the patriarchs of the movement. It
now started to wear the Afenifere agbada, whereas underneath is the PDP
or the conservative politics it represents.
Today, there is a lot of deception going on in the South-West. The
people identified that party and its leadership as progressives, but
they are not. They pretend to be Awoists, but they are not. Until the
leadership of that party is checkmated, there cannot be true politics of
service and development in Yorubaland. It is politics of pockets and
nepotism. Go to the National Assembly and the state Houses of Assembly
and you will see the kind of characters that are there.
Liberty Report