Saturday, 10 November 2012

Why doctors misdiagnose patients in Nigeria, By Muhammad Jameel Yusha’u


Our columnist, Muhammad Yusha’u, invites Jaliya Braimah, a medical doctor, to discuss the reasons doctors misdiagnose patients in Nigeria
After writing a piece in this column entitled “new hospitals, new corruption, new challenges”, the article elicited one of the highest responses, and many of the readers shared their experiences with me via email. One of the key issues they drew my attention to was the issue of misdiagnosing the illnesses of patients. Once they travel to either Egypt, India or UK, they are told that they had been wrongly diagnosed, and within a week or so after treatment they become normal. To address the reasons behind this problem, I have invited Dr Jaliya Braimah (jaliyaadda@hotmail.co.uk), a highly experienced medical doctor in Manchester with a comparative understanding of Nigerian and UK healthcare systems as a guest columnist. The original title of his article was “Reasons behind Misdiagnosis of Patients’ illnesses in the Healthcare systems of Nigeria”. Enjoy. Jameel
By Jaliya Braimah
It is universally accepted that no healthcare (HC) sector in the world is spared the unfortunate issue of making a wrong diagnosis of diseases afflicting patients under its care. Although this article is on Nigeria, it should not be seen as purely an issue peculiar to the Nigerian health care system alone. However in developed countries at least, such events are the exceptions and whenever they occur, they are thoroughly investigated, lessons learnt from the mistakes and recompense given to victims where appropriate. There is no evidence at the moment that such investigations are a normal practice in Nigeria.
The main reason for writing this article is to highlight a few of the important reasons behind our doctors’ inability to make the correct diagnosis of diseases in Nigeria. For ease of discussion, I’ll like to separate this under three sections i.e. the ‘Doctors factors’, the ‘facilities factors’ and the ‘Patients factors’ although these three do overlap extensively.
Doctors’ factors
Nigerian universities have historically produced and still continue to produce some of the best medical graduates in the world. However, the recent economic/political climate has meant that the standard of training has become progressively worse. Overcrowding in our medical schools leading to very low teacher student ratio has resulted in sub-optimal training in most places. This has a direct impact on the quality of the graduates with increasing numbers becoming less able to attain the minimum standard required to cope with life as doctors. This phenomenon is true for both the undergraduate and post-graduate trainings. As a consequence the patients suffer. For example every case of fever is then treated as typhoid/malaria despite evidence to the contrary.
The second most important reason for misdiagnosis is what I call the ‘I know it all syndrome’ where doctors find it impossible to simply say to a patient “I’m sorry I just do not know what is wrong with you”. Hence there is a failure to suggest referral to a colleague who may be better able to help. The old medical dictum of ‘First do no harm’ will remain relevant till the end of times! In fact, patients are better left alone with their illnesses than putting them through an intervention which may cause them more harm. In this regard the behaviour of this group of doctors is not any different from that of our traditional native ones (the Babalawos).
In addition, the art of making a correct diagnosis in Nigerian Hospitals depends largely only on physical examination of the patients at bed side because of limited lab/imaging support. No matter how well trained a doctor may be, if they find themselves in a hospital with little/no access to experienced colleagues, they will struggle to make correct diagnosis. This is the experience of many NYSC doctors who work (especially) in rural areas where cases often come in late and are therefore more complex to manage.
‘Facilities factors’
There is no doubting the fact that modern technological development has made a big impact on the tools available for investigating diseases more accurately. Except for a few centres, most of these tools are lacking in Nigerian hospitals. This is the reason why experience of using them is lacking which means doctors do not get trained to use them, hence the patient suffers as a consequence. It is also true that even in the few hospitals with these facilities, when patients undergo such investigations, the results are sometimes not interpreted correctly, thus emphasising the need to ask for help from more experienced colleagues.
Patients factors’
The fundamental reason why issues of poor diagnosis will persist for a long time is due to the largely uneducated nature of our population. This means that patients are not able to challenge any decisions made on their behalf because they perceive seeing a doctor as a privilege/favour rather than as a matter of constitutional rights! Doctors are seen as demi-gods who are to be worshipped as they can do no wrong.
Another factor to consider is the fact that the Nigerian society is one of the most unbalanced in the world in terms of the haves and the have-nots. This means that while our leaders are suffering from diseases of gluttony (like in Europe/US), the masses are still dying of essentially old fashioned largely preventable diseases of poverty. This is an area that needs to be remembered when treating patients from differing social classes.
Even among the elites, there is another problem which we need to be aware of. For example, how many of them will be happy (content) to be sent home only on paracetamol and the advice to drink lots of fluids and take some rest following a trivial (often viral) chest infection (such as flu) which by its very nature is self limiting? ‘Haba man no antibiotics and no injection(s) for oga?  chineke god’. The expectation to ‘do something’ sometimes adds to the pressure on doctors leading them to make diagnosis which will not stake up to scrutiny. Sometimes doing nothing is best medicine but a number of the “shakers and movers” of our society prefer to be given a medical label. The fear of some doctors losing their customers can be overwhelming. The overall effect of it all is that the Nigerian healthcare system is defined by the over medicalisation of the rich and powerful, and a lack of even the most basic care for the many more!
Finally in this short article, I’ve tried to highlight areas that I think many who work and use the health sector in Nigeria will recognise, but this is by no means an exhaustive discussion. What is also clear is that I’ve done the easy bit i.e. identifying some of the reasons for this phenomenon without delving into the more difficult area of proffering possible solutions. Perhaps this is best left for another day? Let me know what you think.
PremiumTimes

When Williams’ sisters held Lagos captive

by Nkarenyi Ukonu 
Venus and Serena
After a two day ‘breaking the mould’ tour Venus and Serena Williams were hosted to a dinner party on November 2, 2012 at the banquet hall of the Federal Palace Hotel, Victoria Island. The party was  the climax of a two-day visit that included a tennis clinic, visits to important dignitaries, and an exhibition match where the two sisters played against each other.
 Snippets
Question and answer session
Right after the event took off, the two sisters were placed on a podium from where they responded to questions on how they were able to break out of the mould to become world champions in a sport that is both male and white dominated.
 Unveiling the Williams’s mother
Even though she is also an American tennis coach, Oracene Price is best known as the mother of the two sisters. All through the dinner, Oracene kept an eagle eye on her daughters. She was never out of eye shot from them and more or less played the role of mother hen to them.
 The award presentation
The dinner party also afforded the organisers the opportunity to honour two Nigerian women who have distinguished themselves in their chosen fields. Both Nike Okundaye of Nike arts gallery and Dr Ola Orekunrin, CEO, Flying Doctors, were singled out for award presentations.
 Molade Okoya-Thomas, a rallying point
The chairman of CFAO who is very passionate about the uplift of tennis was very much available all through the stay of the Williams sisters. He was not only a fulcrum of support to the organisers; he was seen as a rallying point between the old and the new generation of tennis players.
 Musical performances
There were musical performances by one of the Nigerian Idol judges, Yinka Davies and Timi Dakolo. Though they performed separately, they later did a duet in honour of the sisters.
Punch

Jonathan’s govt lacks will to fight corruption –Reps

 by JOHN AMEH, OLUWOLE JOSIAH, CHUKWUDI AKASIKE and OLALEKAN ADETAYO 

Spokesman for the Senate, Senator Enyinnaya Abaribe
The House of Representatives has excoriated the Federal Government for its subtle moves to bury the Mallam Nuhu Ribadu-led Petroleum Special Task Force report.
Consequently, it said President Goodluck Jonathan’s government lacked the political will to fight corruption, especially in the oil and gas industry.
Its position came in the wake of criticisms of the report by the Presidency. The Special Assistant to President Goodluck Jonathan, Dr. Doyin Okupe, had on Thursday, disparaged it as “containing loopholes.”
The House, however, said it was not surprised by the way the Executive handled Ribadu’s report because probes conducted into the oil sector since 1999 had turned in damning reports, which the Presidency could not act on.
The Chairman, House Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Mr. Zakari Mohammed, told SUNDAY PUNCH in Abuja that there was “a deliberate attempt not to implement the Ribadu report.”
Mohammed noted that the investigation was “calculated to fail from the beginning,” considering the controversies and intrigues, which surrounded the work of the Ribadu committee.
He added, “So, what we have seen is the lack of political will to prosecute.
“The House, for instance, conducted several probes in the past and made recommendations, but how have we fared?
“We did the Farouk Lawan probe, it was politicised; now there is Ribadu probe and the same drama is playing out.
“What this tells us is that there is no political will to prosecute those who have been indicted.”
The lawmaker stated that though the National Assembly had enormous constitutional powers to ask questions on the management of public resources and recommend penalties where necessary, it was not the duty of the legislature to enforce the penalties.
“We have our limits under the constitution.
“The constitution does not give us the power to prosecute; that is the job of the Executive.
“We have asked all the questions and made relevant recommendations, but there is failure of prosecution, which is not our role as legislators,” he added.
Mohammed gave the assurance that the House would continue to perform its constitutional responsibility of exposing corruption.
But The Presidency on Friday, said it was unfortunate that there had been “ignorant carping and unintelligent tittle-tattle” about Ribadu’s report.
Presidential spokesman, Dr. Reuben Abati, made the position of the Presidency known in an interview with one of our correspondents.
According to Abati, those talking about “political will” are beneficiaries of the Federal Government’s commitment to the rule of law and fair play.
Taking on Zakari, he said, “Zakari Mohammed of the House of Representatives talks absent-mindedly about “lack of political will” to fight corruption.
“He should know, if he has been reading the newspapers, that on the basis of both the report of the House of Representatives and the Aig-Imokhuede committee reports, persons are currently being prosecuted in the law courts by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.”
The presidential spokesman added that the committees in question and the probes into the petroleum sector were initiated by Jonathan to ensure transparency in the extractive industry.
He added, “The Federal Government has not done anything to stop or discourage the prosecution of indicted persons. We have made the point, again and again, that in this ongoing fight against corruption, there will be no “cover-ups”; and no “sacred cows,” and that President Jonathan’s only interest is the people’s interest.
“The President is already taking steps to address some of the issues raised in the reports. I had in the last 48 hours drawn attention to the fact that the President gave clear directives on the state of the refineries and that at least one meeting has been held since the presentation of the Report on Refineries, to act specifically on the recommendations made. President Jonathan has directed that he wants the refineries fixed and steps are already being taken; deadlines have been set.”
Meanwhile, the Senate has said it will commence the strengthening and passage of relevant legislation to ensure transparency in the oil sector.
This is coming amid the furore generated by the Ribadu report and lack of transparency in the sector highlighted in the reports of different probes.
Leader of the Senate, Victor Ndoma-Egba (SAN), said on Friday that the Senate through its committees had been carrying out oversights by way of investigations; some revelations had been made.
He said, “We have continued to expose corruption and the weaknesses in the sector. We will need to strengthen certain legislation that will make the industry transparent and accountable to the public.
“But at the end of the day, it will be the duty of the public to hold public officers accountable using the Freedom of Information Act.”
When asked what specific laws would be strengthened or enacted, Ndoma-Egba mentioned the expeditious consideration of the Petroleum Industry Bill, which he said was aimed at cleaning up the petroleum sector.
He noted that the Senate would also be looking at the Money Laundering Act for ways of dealing with corruption in the oil sector.
According to him, the Senate would also strengthen the Anti-Terrorism Law which has some finance components that could be applied to unwholesome activities in the sector.
He said, “There is an improvement in our oversight of the agencies in the oil sector, because now we are discussing issues in the sector.
“Before now, it was seen as a no-go-area. But we discussing them in details. That shows a relative improvement in the legislative oversight of the sector,” he said.
Also speaking on the issue, Senate Spokesman, Sen. Enyinnaya Abaribe, denied that there was any failure in oversight, arguing that the relevant committees had been given the responsibility to oversee the agencies in the sector well.
He said, “We are yet to get a copy of the Ribadu report to know exactly the recommendations and its contents. Such will guide further response from the Senate.”
Meanwhile, the Concerned Advocates for Good Governance has attributed the criticism of the Ribadu’s probe report by the Presidency to the President’s interest in the 2015 presidential election.
National Coordinator of the CAGG, Mr. Olusegun Bamgbose, described the Presidency’s position on the report as a political gimmick and deliberate attempt to rubbish the person of Ribadu.
Bamgbose, who spoke in a telephone interview with SUNDAY PUNCH on Friday, explained that the former EFCC czar was well known to Nigerians as a man whose image could not be destroyed overnight.
Bamgbose said, “What we have seen is an attempt to smear the image of Ribadu. It is a deliberate attempt to remove all opposition from the way. It is obvious that this is all about 2015 presidency.
“He (Ribadu) is a man of integrity, who believes in transparency and honesty. You cannot destroy his image overnight.
“Ribadu made a grave mistake by accepting to be part of the Petroleum Special Task Force. The Ribadu we know is a trusted and reliable person. How do you expect him to mess up when he knows that Nigerians are watching?”
On the criticism from Okupe, the CAGG national coordinator said Jonathan’s aide painted a wrong picture of Ribadu in order to gain a political point.
Bamgbose urged Ribadu to clear his name immediately and resign from the task force because the current administration might not share in his beliefs and goals for the country.
He said Nigerians would soon realise that government’s disapproval of the report was politically motivated.
In the wake of Janaury 2012 uprising against the removal of fuel subsidy, the Senate had conducted investigation into the oil and gas sector, which revealed that NNPC could not explain the schedule and utilisation of the 450,000 crude barrels per day.
Also, the agency failed to explain the 75,000 barrels per day allocated for swarp with a foreign refinery company, just as underpayments of royalties by oil companies and sundry financial abuses were dictated in a similar report from a probe, which the House of Representatives carried out in 2008.
The Senate has yet to consider the report. Just as the NNPC faulted the Ribadu report, so it did to all Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative reports, which chronicled abuses in the oil sector.
The Central Bank of Nigeria, Minister of Finance, Federal Inland Revenue Service and Accountant-General of the Federation, the Minister of Petroleum, among others, constitute the board of NEITI.
Punch

‘Buhari’s Boko Haram rejection, correct political decision’

 by ALLWELL OKPI 

Former Head of State, Maj.-Gen. Muhammadu Buhari (retd),
Some political analysts have described Gen. Muhammadu Buhari’s rejection of the mediatory role offered him in a proposed peace talk between the Federal Government and the Boko Haram as a right political decision.
The analysts, who spoke with SUNDAY PUNCH, said the offer had put Buhari in a political dilemma but that the former presidential candidate of the Congress for Progressive Change took the better of the two options he had.
A senior political science lecturer at the University of Abuja, Prof. Dauda Saleh, said Buhari’s rejection of the offer to serve as mediator was the right thing to do, but noted that it was a tough political choice he made.
“It was really a dilemma. On one hand, if he had accepted the offer, there was the possibility that he would have been linked to the group and that would have been a serious liability and could have ended his political career. This is more so because some people seem to have the impression that he is an Islamic fundamentalist, who had a religious agenda. 
“But on the other hand, rejecting the offer, some people would say he turned down an opportunity to help solve a major national problem. So, both options had the potential of hurting his political career one way or another. But, I think he made the right choice.”
Similarly, the Head of the Department of Political Science and International Relations, University of Lagos, Prof. Solomon Akinboye, said Buhari’s decision could have been acceptance or rejection, with uncertain political implications.
He said, “The man (Buhari) said he does not know them (Boko Haram), so, he cannot mediate for them. It was his decision to make and I think he was right in taking that decision. Whether his decision would affect his political career is another issue.
“However, if he had accepted and was able to help curb the insecurity in the country, it would have been a plus for him. It was really a political dilemma. Now, some people might see him as running away from an important national service.”
In the same vein, the National President of the Arewa Youth Consultative Forum, Yerima Shettima, said Buhari’s rejection of the offer was a welcome development.
Shettima said the proposed peace talk was likely to fail, adding that the nomination of Buhari might be a trap to discredit him.
He said, “Buhari’s rejection of the offer of the mediatory role is a welcome development and that is because I don’t see anything coming out of the so-called dialogue.
“I believe there are still sign that the whole negotiation will not hold water and it is not proper for Buhari, with the reputation he has built over the years, to get involved in such activity.
“Buhari said he did not know these people called Boko Haram and you cannot expect him to stand for people he has not met. They should have chosen clerics or some other prominent people in the North, not Buhari who is leading an opposition party. Whether you like it or not, this move has a political undertone. It is either a booby trap set by the government of the day to mess Buhari up, or those people behind Boko Haram want to mess him up.”
Shettima added that Buhari’s rejection of the offer had also shown that the insurgency had nothing to do with Buhari’s loss at the 2011 presidential election or the North’s ambition to regain power at the centre.
“No real northerner is happy with what is happening, because we are losing more,” he said.
Punch

No Good Luck in Obama’s Re-election, He Worked for It, Says House Member Eziuche Ubani


111112F.Ubani.jpg - 111112F.Ubani.jpg
Hon. Eziuche Ubani
The just-concluded general elections in the United States of America offered Nigerians an opportunity to assess the political system in that country vis-a-vis what obtains here at home. In this interview with Onwuka Nzeshi, Chairman House Committee on Climate Change, Hon. Eziuche Ubani, says there is no basis for comparison as the presidential system practiced in the two countries are poles apart
The United States of America has just concluded its presidential elections and achieved a smooth transition and this has been greeted by popular acclaim of the American democracy across the world. What lessons can Nigeria learn from that exercise?

The lesson lies in the presence in the United States of a democratic structure and political culture where the power to elect anybody resides in the people. There were no manipulations and no underhand deals; there was nothing but very scientific process that places power in the hands of the electorate who make their decisions and those decisions are respected by the system. There is something it says about the foundation of democracy that they have - that at the end of the day, it is the people who should be at the centre of every process. The people are supposed to elect their leaders; they are supposed to select them by whatever criteria or sentiments and also remove them as they please because that is the essence of democracy. But in our own case here, it is not the same. The parameters by which our leaders emerge are very different, convoluted and sometimes convoluted such that sometimes those who are not supposed to emerge as leaders do emerge as political leaders. Sometimes those who are reluctant and unprepared are chosen as leaders. There was no good luck in the Obama thing (re-election), rather it was scientific; he worked for it; he made himself available; the people assessed him and he was prepared to accept the verdict of the people because at the end of the day the people are at the centre of every governance process. Governance is about the welfare and well being of the people. It is what they want that should happen so that is why the American people put their sentiments and preferences in the choice of their leaders. Unless we have that kind of foundation, the proper leaders will never emerge here.

Nigeria claims to have copied its presidential system of government from the United States model but with the differences you have seen in both systems, do you think we can still lay claim to that position?

We didn’t copy anything from America. It is just a claim, which we make because it soothes our ego and fancy to say that we copied from America as if that is the only licence for best practice.  We didn’t copy anything from them because if you look at the American Constitution, they are running a federal system of government where powers are devolved; where the arms of government are properly separated and where states are independent as proper federating units. This kind of system puts people at the centre of the electoral process and decides what they want at any point in time. As you saw during the campaigns, they were dominated by issues relating to the people such as abortion, job creation, taxation, etc. The people made their decision based on what the candidates had to offer on these issues but we don’t have anything in our process and procedure that really gives the people the power to decide who governs them. Here a leader is elected on an empty platform and thereafter he just stands up to make a pronouncement and it becomes a policy. We didn’t copy anything from America rather we are running a parody of the American system. The truth is that what we have here is a caricature of the system we claim to have copied.

If what we have is not the right model would you advocate that we go for the US model system in full now that Nigeria is embarking on a review of the 1999 Constitution?
No, I will not borrow the American system even though it has worked for them for over two hundred years now. I will recommend that we run a parliamentary system. The parliamentary system is much more accountable. We do not have the temperament to be able to run the American system. Remember that the decision to unite and form one country called the United States of America was fought for and the people wrote their Constitution to suit their particular circumstance. It wasn’t the case here. What can put us back on track is to return to the parliamentary system we had where ministers are members of the parliament and have to win elections before they become ministers so that there is a proper government. For instance, in the National Assembly here, you don’t know which party is in opposition and which is the majority or the ruling party. Everything is so mixed up and convoluted to the extent that the individual ends up serving himself. You are not involved in what your party is doing and your representation here does not translate to your party’s ideology or manifesto and yet you can win elections. I prefer a situation where we have a parliamentary system; ministers will win elections and there is an ordered process of succession of party leadership so that the parties will become stronger not in the sense of a party being the largest in Africa but by what they in terms of the programmes they sell to the public.  I don’t particularly like the idea of transplanting the presidential system to our shores. Over the years, I have learnt that you don’t give a black man so much discretion.
The presidential system gives room for so much discretion that people when they get elected become emperors and monarchs. But in the parliamentary system, it is easy to pass a vote of no confidence on a head of government that is not alive to its responsibilities. If the Prime Minister fails, the government falls and they form another one so at the end of the day it puts government on its toes and puts the party in the right frame of things. Here governance is personalised and you often hear things like “my government, my administration” but in the parliamentary system you don’t hear such things because governance is a collective responsibility. I think it will make us much more accountable. That is also what would have helped South Africa but if you look at what people like Zuma are doing there you will see that tendency of the black man to turn an otherwise good and democratic system into something else. When we were running the parliamentary system our democracy was much more stable; everybody was accountable because you come to parliament and answer questions.
If we want to do a public hearing here and we ask a minister to provide some documents, he will not. That does not happen in a parliamentary system because the minister sits in parliament and if any question arises in his area of mandate, he will have to answer it. It is much more accountable, much more manageable and much more easy for the party to regulate the conduct of its members and ensure that a government run by them does not derail from its mandate.

Now that the National Assembly is working towards amending the 1999 Constitution, are we expecting major changes such as going back to the parliamentary system?

I don’t know; I can’t say... I am just a member of the Constitution Review Committee but I can’t say that now because I don’t know in which direction the process would eventually go. It depends on what Nigerians want and how far reaching we are willing to go.  So I can’t make that kind of prediction until we start the process and see what Nigerian really want and how we can manage it without creating chaos and anarchy. But I think that if we want to make any structural change in the polity, what we need is the parliamentary system. Look at the way the present system is being run- there is a provision in the law for a State and Local Government Joint Account and we said the states should also put ten per cent in the account of the local government but what has happened is that even the allocations from the federal government to the local governments have disappeared into the coffers of the states. That is not the way to go and achieve the goals of development in a country.

The whole world is jubilating over the successful conclusion of the elections in the United States but what is it that Africa and Nigeria stand to gain from the re-election of Obama?

Well, in the electioneering campaigns and debates, Africa didn’t feature at all. Also, the majority of Asia too did not feature in those debates. It was largely their domestic economy and the conflicts in the Arab world. So that is to tell you something about the shift in the focus of the American government, which was again determined by what their people want. It was Israel, Palestine and other flash points in the Middle East such as Iran and Syria.
So the point is that Africa doesn’t quite feature in some of these things except something happens. If we go by the election debates, Africa didn’t quite feature even though Obama is of African descent. I know he has visited one or two places in Africa since he became President but since Africa didn’t feature in the debate it is difficult to know what we in Africa should expect in his second term. We want to see a programme that involves Africa and puts the continent in focus because there are problems in Africa. Many countries in sub-Saharan Africa have become emerging markets and the United States need to have some engagement with some of these countries.
There are also some security issues like in Mali and Somalia where you have Al- Qaeda and its affiliates operating and terrorising the people. This kind of conflict situations also has something to do with the global war on terror and should have featured in the US election debates. I know that the United Nations has given a nod to a military intervention led by ECOWAS to flush out the rebels in Mali but the fact is that this is something that will benefit the global war on terror if America steps in by providing resources and training to the troops. The mission in Mali is important so that the security and development interests of countries such Nigeria, Mauritania, Niger, Chad, Libya  and even Algeria are not compromised.

In the early days of Obama’s first term, he talked a lot about the US switching to the green economy and the need to mitigate the impacts of climate change but these issues were also not captured in the campaigns. Are you surprised about this silence?

Yes, it didn’t feature and I am not surprised because the Republicans deny climate change and do not want to be engaged on the issue. There is a bill that has been sitting in the US Congress for a very long time on climate change and nobody has touched it because the Republicans are in control there. But you can see how the issue of climate change was injected into the campaigns by an act of God very close to the elections.  Hurricane Sandy blew across the United States and the people’s eyes were opened and became convinced that this may have been caused by climate change. I can tell you that Obama will do more to put climate change on the front burner in this second coming. But nonetheless there are so many things he did about energy independence and investment in clean energy during the first term and he should be able to expand them in this fresh term. I think that the issues of climate change and global warming will be ignited again particularly now when he will not be encumbered by the need to seek another term. However, I urge Obama to use the opportunity of the Doha Climate Change Conference coming up in December to re-inject America into the process. If he does that it will also rub off on African countries.
If America embraces green energy and dumps fossil fuel does that not spell doom for economies such as ours that is solely dependent on oil?

I don’t think so. Everybody and every country must begin to think about life after oil. We must deliberately wean ourselves from oil. That is what some of these Middle East countries namely Saudi Arabia, Qatar and United Arab Emirates are doing. Brazil too. These countries even when they have oil are moving away from oil. They now sell their oil and use the proceeds to augment market investments and develop alternative sources of energy such as solar and wind energy. But in our own case, we don’t even mention it here and that is what we all should be concerned about as citizens of Nigeria.

In the course of the debates preceding the elections, Obama came under heavy criticisms by the Republicans who felt his government was weak and soft on some regimes perceived to be pro-terrorism and a threat to world peace. Now with this renewed mandate given to him, do you think the world would be safer than before?
There is something they don’t understand. They think Obama is a weak President but they are wrong. The American system is abiding and its interests are still the same but the point is that Romney was making those statements because he wanted to win. The Republicans don’t seem to understand what has changed about the world and why the US cannot just wake up now and attack a country like Iran or North Korea. They talk about using America’s strength to lead but they don’t know that the new world order calls for partnership among countries rather than the leadership of one country.
Every country has become autonomous and very strong and the issues of conflict in international politics have undergone some form of metamorphosis. The current dynamic of international politics is such that you don’t dictate to countries but you consult with them to build consensus on how to tackle conflicts.
After several years of war, Americans do not want to go into another war and that was why Romney had problems in his campaigns, which many saw as a harbinger of another war. Obama understands the true situation that the way out is not to embark on wars at the slightest excuse but to engage the various countries that may be inter connected with a conflict and see how it can be resolved without deploying troops.
We just hope that with Obama’s deep understanding of how the world has changed militarily and how countries are intertwined economically, conflicts will be minimised. It is now more of consultation and cooperation rather than dictation and confrontation.
ThisDay

Swearing-in of justices: CJN may lose powers to presidency

by Lanre Adewole
Following the controversy generated by the decision of the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Aloma Mukthar, not to admit Justice Ifeoma Jombo-Ofo to oath of office as a justice of the Court of Appeal, a move has reportedly commenced by stakeholders to revert the full appointing power to the president which constitutionally includes the swearing-in of justices confirmed by the Senate.
Governors, the appointing authority at the state level, conduct the swearing-in of judges.
Saturday Tribune was told that it was former President Olusegun Obasanjo that began the delegation of the oath ceremony to the head of the judiciary, during the tenure of former CJN, Justice Mohammed Lawal Uwais, just to reduce the stress of combining presidential duties with the swearing in of  justices.
The current push might see President Goodluck Jonathan conducting the swearing in of the embattled judge in the face of the decision of the CJN to stick to her decision not to so do.
An indication that she might not be shifting ground emerged on Thursday evening after a visit by the Senate Committee on Judiciary to her failed to engender any compromise.
She reportedly told the senators that they erred in taking a position on the matter by passing a resolution asking her to admit Jombo-Ofo to oath of office without hearing her own side of the story.
Meanwhile, the judiciary is roiling in another round of crisis over the issue which could lead to another possible collision course with both the presidency and the legislature.
Saturday Tribune was informed on Friday by  sources that strong indications were emerging, suggestive of the possibility of President Jonathan admitting the oath of office on Jombo-Ofo in the course of next week.
An unconfirmed report also disclosed that the acting President of the Court of Appeal, Justice Dalhatu Adamu, allegedly added another dimension to the crisis by issuing appointment letter to the embattled judge as a justice of the intermediate court on Thursday, though she might not be resuming duties yet.
A source, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria who is of the embattled judge’s camp, told the Saturday Tribune that swearing in the judges was just a ceremonial norm, which if not conducted, would not detract from the fact that the elevation of the said judicial officer had taken place.
It was further learnt that Jombo-Ofo’s camp had already taken her case to the presidency, where an argument on the institution with the requisite constitutional power to conduct swearing in had been reportedly tabled.
“The president of Nigeria can swear her (Jombo-Ofo) in and he is going to do that soon because the power to swear judges in was just delegated to the CJN,” the source claimed.
Saturday Tribune equally learnt that pro-Jombo-Ofo forces were already gathering information on other judges caught in the web of the alleged opportunistic venture of the embattled judge, but granted waiver by successive leadership of the judiciary, including the incumbent CJN.
Topping the list, according to an insider, was Justice Wilson who was sworn-in on the day Jombo-Ofo was dropped,  representing Edo State, though she was originally from Ekiti State and allegedly had both states on different service documents even after her marriage to an Edo indigene.
Also mentioned was Justice Mary Peter-Odili who was reportedly elevated to the Court of Appeal using the South-South slot, only for an available South-East slot vacated by the retired Justice Ogbuagu to be used in elevating her to the Supreme Court.
Those behind the “intelligence gathering” claimed that Odili was to take retired Justice Niki Tobi’s vacant slot, but allegedly moved to the South-East where she originally hailed before being married to a South-South man, to pave the way for another candidate.
Another justice of the apex court which retired recently, Justice Olufunmilola Adekeye, who hailed from Osun State but used Ekiti state slot to the highest court in the land due to her marriage to an Ekiti indigene, was equally mentioned in the dossier.
Saturday Tribune was told that rules on state of origin of married female judges had changed in the last two years to accommodate the kind of switch that Jombo-Ofo did.
SaturdayTribune

PDP, ACN, AP challenge Mimiko’s victory at tribunal

by Yinka Oladoyinbo
THE Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Accord Party (AP) and the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), on Friday, approached the Election Petition Tribunal in Akure to challenge the result of the October 20 governorship election in the state.
The three political parties filed different petitions against the outcome of the election won by the Ondo State governorship candidate of Labour Party (LP), Dr Olusegun Mimiko.
The PDP’s candidate, Olusola Oke, candidate of the ACN, Oluwarotimi Akeredolu and his counterpart in AP, Olawale Ojo, said the conduct of the election did not follow the provisions of the 2010 Electoral Act.
They argued that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) ought not to have declared Mimiko as the winner of the election, which many people adjudged as free and fair.
The petition filed by the AP and its candidate alleged that the electoral umpire unlawfully excluded its candidate’s name and logo from the ballot papers meant for the election.
In the petition submitted to the tribunal secretary, Mr Yusuf Musa,  the AP argued that INEC omitted its log on the ballot paper used for the Oct 20 governorship poll in the state, contrary to the 2010 electoral act.
The petitioners insisted that INEC sent three of its officials to monitor its primary held on August 1, 2012 but still excluded its candidate’s name from the list of contestants.
The Accord Party prayed the tribunal to order INEC to conduct fresh poll that would allow its candidate participate.
The PDP and its candidate in their petition alleged irregularities, manipulation of votes and outright falsification of results in some areas of the state.
In the petition filed by his lead counsel, Mr Kayode Olatoke, the PDP’s candidate prayed for the nullification of the election and the conduct of another one.
Alternatively, he asked the tribunal to declare him as the winner of the election.
In the same vein, the ACN and its candidate filed a 190-paragraph, 403 pages petition at the tribunal, praying for the nullification of the election as Mimiko was  not duly elected by a majority of lawful votes.
SundayTribune