Sunday, 2 December 2012

FG may fine telcos more for bad service


Telecommunication companies may have more fines levied on them if their services haven’t improved by the time service quality checks are made in December, Communications Technology Minister Omobola Johnson said.
The telecommunications regulator fined companies including MTN Group Ltd. (MTN) and Emirates Telecommunications Corp. (ETISALAT) a combined 1.17 billion naira ($7.4 million) in May for failing to meet minimum service standards. Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country with more than 160 million people, is targeting voice penetration of close to 100 percent by 2014-2015.
“Fining isn’t something we want to do every six months, so we’re working very closely with them,” Johnson said in a Nov. 26 interview in the southern city of Warri. “Many of the companies don’t want to get fined again, but if they do not meet those quality of service indicators, they will get fined,” the minister said, adding that most customers say the service hasn’t improved.
The Nigerian Communications Commission fined South Africa- based MTN and Abu Dhabi-based Emirates, or Etisalat, 360 million naira each for failing to meet the service standards. New Delhi- based Bharti Airtel Ltd. (BHARTI) was fined 270 million naira and domestic operator Globacom Ltd. 180 million naira.
The regulator threatened last year to stop operators from signing new customers unless they reduced the number of dropped calls and improved connections. MTN and Etisalat cited lack of power and sabotage as reasons for the poor service.
Power Cuts
While the companies need to increase their spending on infrastructure, the ministry is trying to “remove a lot of delays and bureaucratic bottlenecks that are in their way,” Johnson said. Power cuts are a daily occurrence in Nigeria, where demand for electricity is almost double the supply of about 4,000 megawatts.
MTN is investing $1.4 billion in Nigeria this year to improve infrastructure and capacity. Etisalat said after it was fined in May that it will spend more than $500 million on its network.
The ministry has banned some sales promotions, including lotteries for free minutes, because they added pressure to the system, Johnson said.
If the necessary infrastructure is put in place, voice penetration should reach almost 100 percent by 2014 - 2015, compared with about 70 percent now, she said. Data penetration should reach 30 percent by 2017 from 6 percent now.
Stock Exchange
Nigeria wants international companies operating in the country to list on the Nigerian Stock Exchange “to democratize the wealth and the revenue that they’ve generated in Nigeria,” Johnson said. While none of the main four telecommunications operators are listed on the exchange, the authorities have stopped short of compulsory listing “because that will be seen as targeting telecommunications companies, and really and truly, it wasn’t a requirement or a condition for when they were investing, particularly the international ones,” she said.
The government should encourage companies to list by standardizing regulatory requirements with global exchanges and removing barriers, the minister said.
“We’re looking at a lot of things that detract or discourage investors including some of the shareholder activism that we’ve seen in the recent past, again managing that much better than we’ve done,” she said.
BusinessNews

2015 face-off: President in fresh plot against Obasanjo

 by:
2015 face-off: President in  fresh plot against Obasanjo
Loyalists of former President Olusegun Obasanjo have raised alarm over alleged plans by the Presidency to discreetly ‘deal’ with him for allegedly launching a ‘cold war’ to discredit the administration of President Goodluck Jonathan.
According to sources, the Presidency is under pressure to revisit investigations into the $180m Halliburton scandal. They claim that some groups are being covertly sponsored to file petitions at the International Criminal Court (ICC) against the former president over the killing of innocent people in Odi and Zaki-Biam communities in Bayelsa and Benue States respectively.
The former president had during his tenure ordered troops to invade Odi over the killing of military men by militants. A similar infraction that provoked the same measure happened in Zaki-Biam.
The alleged counter-attack by the Presidency is coming against the backdrop of recent public criticism of President Goodluck Jonathan’s handling of the Boko Haram insurgency and other security challenges by Obasanjo.
Barely a week after the airing of the critical comments, Jonathan hit back during his presidential media chat saying that rather than stamp out militancy, the Odi invasion only killed innocent old people and children.
The spat between the president and his erstwhile godfather is seen in political circles as the latest evidence of increasingly tense 2015 power struggle within the ruling Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP). Obasanjo is said not to be favourably disposed towards backing a Jonathan second term. He is suspected to be one of the boosters of a potential presidential bid by the Jigawa State Governor, Sule Lamido with the Rivers State Governor, Rotimi Amaechi, as the undercard.
Investigations by our correspondent confirmed that the camp of the former President had been gripped with fear in the last one week over the alleged plot by certain forces in the presidency to launch a campaign of calumny against him.
It was learnt that the ex-President after receiving intelligence alert last weekend tried to stop some negative advertisements against him in some newspapers, but he only succeeded in convincing a South-West-based newspaper to grant him concession.
Apart from media attacks, loyalists of the ex-President are disturbed about moves to revisit investigations into the Halliburton scam, as well as plans by some influential groups to go to the ICC.
A highly reliable source in Obasanjo’s camp, who spoke in confidence yesterday, said: “They are planning to deal with Baba because they think he will not support the 2015 project. Already, they have started this plot with media attacks, including placement of indicting advertisements against Obasanjo.
“We have got intelligence report that some people are trying to prevail on the Presidency to revisit the $180m Halliburton scandal since Mr. Adeyanju Bodunde, a former Personal Assistant to Obasanjo, was implicated in the alleged scam.
“They are plotting to frame up the ex-President in the Halliburton scandal. It is sad that they are desperate; they want to hang something on Obasanjo’s neck in order to intimidate him to shelve any involvement in 2015 project. Yet, we are in a democracy. Obasanjo should be entitled to his opinion no matter how bitter it is.”
Bodunde was arraigned in 2010 alongside George Mark, Jeffrey Tesler (now at large), Hans George Christ, Heinrich J. Stockhausen, Julius Berger Nigeria Plc, and Bilfinger Berger GMBH.
George Mark, Jeffrey Tesler, Hans George Christ, Heinrich J. Stockhausen; Julius Berger Nigeria Plc, Bilfinger Berger GMBH were alleged to have sometime between 2002 and 2003 conspired to make several cash payments of $1million (five times) totalling in equivalent the sum of $5million to Bodunde. They were alleged to have committed the offence contrary to Section 16 of the Money Laundering Act 1995(as saved by Section 23(2) of the Money Laundering Act 2004) and punishable under Section 15(2) and (3) of the Money Laundering Act 1995(as saved by Section 23(2) of the Money Laundering Act, 2004). Julius Berger had engaged in plea bargain.
The source also admitted that if there is any worry at all in Obasanjo’s camp, it is the ICC dimension to the plot against the former President.
“They want to use some groups to write petitions to ICC on Odi military campaign in 1999 and the Zaki-Biam issue. Their plan is to put an obstacle before Obasanjo to distract him from serving as a rallying point for politicians of like minds seeking a fundamental change in 2015,” he said.
“At least a group from Bayelsa State has indicated interest in filing petition before the ICC. So, you can see what we are saying and why we have every cause to be concerned. Even at that, Obasanjo has not told any of his associates the direction he wants to go in 2015. I do not know what is behind this witch-hunt.”
When contacted, the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Public Affairs, Dr. Doyin Okupe, said: “What I can say is that this government is not witch-hunting anybody, it does not do so.
“Let me put it on record that it is not the style of President Goodluck Jonathan to witch-hunt or intimidate anybody. The President is an extremely liberal person, he does not believe in vengeance or oppressing anyone.”
Okupe also denied any crisis of confidence between the President and Obasanjo.
He added: “The media may present the situation as if there is a problem between the President and ex-President Obasanjo, but there is no truth in such insinuation. From inside, I do not see any issue or disagreement between the President and our former leader.
“Ex-President Obasanjo is an elder statesman and somebody that enjoys the love and respect of the Presidency.”
TheNation

Electricity in Nigeria: A disturbing dimension

By Tonnie Iredia
Each time Nigerians grumble over the failure of successive governments to provide them with electricity, government officials are quick at pointing out that Nigerians are impatient adding that ours is a nation seeking to enjoy within a few years in existence what the developed countries got after hundreds of years.
No one makes effort to verify the accuracy of such ‘official’ statistics. Instead, everyone tends to note the counseling by government with mixed feelings hoping for some change in the near future which has never come. Getting the true position is however not exactly as hard as we imagine in view of the ease with which this writer gathered from one journal a few days ago that electricity was first produced in Lagos, Nigeria in 1896 less than 15years after it happened in England. Thus, we have as a community been dealing with electricity in the last one hundred and sixteen years.
This revelation renders absurd, the charge that Nigerians are impatient about development and some level of improvement in their daily lives. Could it then be true that official deceit more than anything else, is our real dilemma concerning electricity? As we shall show shortly, a new trend in the disposition of elected office holders to the activities of the Power holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) tends to lend credence to the theory.
It would appear that because our leaders have ‘light’ most of the time, they hardly understand the common man’s unending pains of darkness. First, they are serviced by generators from our common purse. Second, virtually all of the little power the nation can produce is always given to those in the corridors of power.
It was so when the subject was handled by the Public Works Department (PWD) from the beginning of colonial times till 1950. There was no change from then till 1972 when it was under the Electricity Corporation of Nigeria (ECN) and it has remained so since 2005 when the PHCN was established.
Interestingly, the leaders have a tendency of not paying for services rendered to either their homes or offices. Whenever “there is a break in transmission” in their areas for a few minutes, a near war situation is declared on PHCN and their operatives are assaulted at will. This bizarre dimension is no doubt disturbing.
For example about a week ago, the management of the Kaduna Electricity Distribution Company, KEDC, a subsidiary of the PHCN, accused the Governor of Sokoto State, Aliyu Wamakko of personally assaulting its workers. According to the Acting Managing Director of the Company, Mohammed Adamu, Governor Wamakko, flogged a PHCN manager for failing to supply electricity to his community.  Adamu at a press conference on the subject described the assault which took place on Saturday, 20th October, 2012, as an unusual and unfortunate event which was beyond his company’s comprehension.
He explained that his business manager for Gwiwa Business Unit, Sokoto State, Moses Osigwe, was invited by the Governor to his personal residence, over the issue of lack of power supply to his hometown, Wamakko, as a result of a failed 2.5MVA transformer.
He added that as the business manager was trying to explain the problem, the governor brought out a horse whip (popularly known as bulala in Hausa language) and lashed him thoroughly. Two hefty mobile police men were allegedly ordered by the Governor to continue with the beating spree until the business manager fell on the ground and became unconscious. Two other PHCN operatives- namely, Isyaku Daura, Officer 2 (Electrical) and Nuruddeen Mohammed, Staff 1 (Lines) were similarly reportedly manhandled.
On its part, the government denied the allegation. According to the Senior Special Assistant to the Governor, Sani Umar, the Governor only demanded an explanation for the N17 million he gave to PHCN to install a new transformer in Wamakko which they failed to do.
We would have doubted the PHCN version of the story because it looked too barbaric and uncivilized to be credited to a Governor but for the fact that the allegations were made at an open Press Conference. In addition why should the lives of workers like Isyaku and Nuruddeen be in jeopardy on account of the PHCN’s alleged breaches?
This is the second time this year that a report of assault by state government officials on PHCN staff has been made public. The first time was when officials of the Ekiti State Government allegedly beat up PHCN managers operating in Ado Ekiti.
The Managers-Messrs, Julius Ige, in charge of Marketing and Ilori Kayode  Brown, Head of Public Relations were reportedly abducted in the night of Friday June 29 by aides to the state Governor and ‘brutally’ held till 1.15am of the next day because PHCN disconnected power supply to the Government House over repeatedly demanded but  unpaid electricity bills.  While there is nothing wrong in prodding PHCN to be proactive, to assault their staff in the process leaves the nation not just in the dark but indeed in the jungle.
Since no law permits government officials to manhandle fellow citizens, the above reports ought to draw attention to no less than 2 important issues. The first is the continued retention of immunity clause in our constitution which stops the common man from suing “Area-Boy” governors who unduly inflict pain on the less privileged.
Does the immunity clause empower elected executives to take the laws into their own hands and abridge the rule of law? The second issue is the vexed subject of State Police. State Governors in Nigeria only remember that they have no powers over the Police when they are accused of not tackling insecurity in their states.
They don’t tell us why in spite of their acclaimed disability, they are always able to use the same federal police to harass their real or imaginary opponents. Can anyone imagine what would have happened to the PHCN officials in Sokoto if the Governor had what is called State Police?
Vanguard

No plan to reconcile Jonathan, Obasanjo –PDP

 by ALLWELL OKPI 
Former president Olusegun Obasanjo and President Goodluck Jonathan
The Peoples Democratic Party has said it has no plans to wade into the rift between President Goodluck Jonathan and former President Olusegun Obasanjo, over the best way to tackle militancy and terrorism in the country.
The National Publicity Secretary of PDP, Olisa Metuh, told SUNDAY PUNCH that the party had not seen any reason to intervene in the argument.
He stated that though Jonathan and Obasanjo had expressed divergent opinions on the 1999 invasion of Odi, it did not amount to conflict between them.
Metuh said, “You only reconcile people who have a misunderstanding or are in a squabble. As far as the party is concerned, there is no quarrel between President Goodluck Jonathan and former President Olusegun Obasanjo, so there is no plan to reconcile them.
“Though both of them have expressed divergent opinions on some national issues, both of them are still working together towards deepening democracy in Nigeria and making sure that we deliver on our promises to the people.”
Earlier, the National Secretary of the PDP, Olagunsoye Oyinlola, had dispelled speculations that there were political differences between Jonathan and Obasanjo.
Oyinlola said, “Some individuals want to use the controversy surrounding the Odi killings to set the two leaders of the PDP against each other.
“There is no friction between the President and Obasanjo. The issue of Odi killings will not cause hostility between the two leaders of our party.”
The argument between the two PDP leaders ensued about three weeks ago in Warri, during the celebration of Pastor Ayo Oritsajefor’s 40 years in the ministry. Obasanjo told the gathering that Jonathan was guilty of allowing terrorism to fester, without taking a decisive action.
He used the invasion of Odi in Bayelsa State and Zaki Biam in Benue State as examples of his decisive actions against militancy while in government.
During the November 18 Presidential Media Chat, Jonathan replied Obasanjo, saying Odi invasion was a failed exercise, which resulted in the death of the aged and children, and not the militant youths.
Special Assistant on Public Affairs and subsequently Minister of Aviation during Obasanjo’s regime, Femi Fani-Kayode later said Jonathan got the facts of Odi invasion wrong and that the action of the Obasanjo-led government arrested the incessant killings of security operatives by militants in the Niger Delta.  
ThePunch

Unasked Questions About Corruption


Femi-Falana-Bkpage.jpg - Femi-Falana-Bkpage.jpg
Femi Falana
For most Nigerians, a discussion of corruption is often an opportunity to lambast the state and its managers. The media will continue to report cases of corruption. Sometimes corruption probe panels turn out to be the subject of probes themselves!  In other words, a demon calling the devil bad! It is based on the foregoing that the state has always received knuckles. But is blaming the state the only response that should guide our response to corruption? Why has public focus been limited to the activities of the state and its actors?  What happens to the individual and group levels of analysis in the corruption matrix? Is the state the only liable institution?
We should ask the unasked questions in our attempt at locating and fighting corruption. First, what are individuals doing wrongly in the fight against corruption? Secondly, how do groups in the society, some of which often claim to fight corruption, contribute to the flourishing of the menace?
In a society where corruption is centralised, monies stolen from the public purse is redistributed and used to create employment and infrastructure within the society. Thus, rather than send such monies to Swiss or British Banks as the late Gen. Sani Abacha and Mr. James Ibori did thereby creating employment in Switzerland and Britain, the organised corruption follows the methodology of Suharto of Indonesia. It is therefore argued that the Suharto regime did not condone the exportation of corruption largesse hence the development of Indonesia today! What would have happened if all the stolen funds from Nigeria were retained in the Nigerian economy?
The State and Graft punishment
However, a cursory examination of the ant-graft laws in Nigeria today will reveal that there are sufficient laws to deal with the issue of corruption. Sadly however, according to the perception index of Transparency International, Nigeria was ranked 144th out of the 146 countries, beating Bangladesh and Haiti to last position. The KPMG also recently released a report in which Nigeria was ranked as the most corrupt state in West Africa.
As stated above, it is not because Nigeria does not have sufficient laws to deal with the issue of corruption. In fact, there may be very few countries with more anti-graft laws, the problem however, is that there is no political will in addition to the fact that our system harbours sacred cows and the “untouchables”. We are all witnesses to the Halliburton scandal and how it was bungled by Nigeria in order to shield the powerful.
In other words, while accused persons may file interlocutory appeals, the EFCC should have enough courage to drag judges who grant orders staying proceedings to the National Judicial Council (NJC).  Similarly, lawyers who file such sham applications and other frivolous motions should be reported to the disciplinary committee of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) for gross misconduct.
Corruption in Nigeria, no doubt has assumed a dangerous dimension, which percolates all the strata of the society. The civil society is not spared in this menace. In fact, it has so much eaten deep into the fabrics of our society that the hitherto insulated places have now been taken over by corruption. Rather than being a conscience of the masses, the civil society has become a tool in the hands of corrupt people. Our NGOs have become corruption vessels and the effect is what we see today - a society without conscience.
Foreign aids meant for specific roles have been converted to personal use. Gone were the days when NGOs stood and spoke for the oppressed masses; now, they are agents of retrogressive, oppressive and corrupt personnel. The situation is even made worse due to the proliferation of NGOs where people just register organisations whimsically.
The roles of religious bodies in the fight against corruption have also become a source of worry. These bodies have become haven for corrupt individuals whose monies are used to sustain them.  Instead of speaking the truth, religious leaders have suddenly become appendages of the ruling class using their vantage position to enrich themselves at the expense of the poor members of their congregation who often see them as next to God.
Why is it that in spite of the stinking poverty in the country, religion is hastily becoming another source of psychological trauma for the ordinary Nigerian? A poor man goes to church or mosque and is greeted with SUVs and other flashy vehicles belonging to the cleric. Even when the congregation cannot afford to eat two balanced square meals in a day, some of our religious fathers deliberately or inadvertently display wealth? Do the religious fathers think about repercussion of some of their actions? How many religious leaders are so committed to feel for the poor families in their congregation to a point where they are touched to leave out some of the worldly things like gold wrist watches and of recent private jets? For a good number of youths, it is not therefore evangelism or the love of Christ that makes them heed the call, rather it is a bid to become like my pastor in materialistic wealth. Most especially, while industries are grounding, religious structures are rising.
Hence, a new source of wealth has arrived. It then becomes easy to understand why some of the most corrupt individuals in Nigeria find it easy to go to churches and mosques on Sunday and Friday without fearing that tough messages await them there.
You would recall that a few years ago, there was a move by a state government to impose taxes and levies on churches, mosques and other religious centres. All those who were opposed to the policy should be having a second thought in view of the growing opulence of some religious leaders. In the United Kingdom a Nigerian "bishopreneur" is currently being investigated for fraud by the police. Indeed, one of the issues being looked into is the propriety of collecting tithes from poor congregants only to channel the proceeds to acquire limousines and private jets.
Pastor Tunde Bakare of the Latter Rain Assembly was reported to have said that not until the religious leaders, including himself, were incarcerated, there wouldn't be sanity in the churches. He said churches have failed their congregations, as pastors have now become tyrants, oppressors and leaders without care for their followers.
In a swift reaction, President of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor, who  acquired his jet a couple of weeks ago, took a swipe at Bakare for condemning their crave for jets and opulent life. He said everything a pastor could get for evangelism should be acquired. Not minding the economic situation of the people, I think the statement credited to this leader is uncharitable knowing full well that many Christians today would fare well if the resources used in buying these jets are made available to them. Just like Bakare said, there is need for sanity also in the civil society. It is sad that poor members of the congregation cannot afford to put their children in the schools ‘owned’ by their churches or mosques because the tuition fees are colossal and beyond their reach. What a sad plight!
If this is the case, then, the tax authorities must extend their dragnets to all religious centres where substantial income is generated on a regular basis in the name God. A few months ago, a contractor donated a church worth several millions of naira to the Otuoke community in honour of President Goodluck Jonathan. Just last week, an ex-president raised N400 million to build a small mosque in the premises of a library. Such business ventures and schools including universities set up by religious institutions which charge exorbitant fees that the children of the poor members cannot afford should pay taxes to the state. The prosperity pastors who are buying jets to preach the gospel to those who wallow in abject poverty should be assessed according to their wealth and be made to pay commensurate taxes. After all, they pay appropriate fees for parking their jets at local and international airports at home and abroad.
In reaction to bias of the law in favour of the bourgeoisie there has been a popular demand by Nigerians for the introduction of the death penalty in corruption cases. Since armed robbers are sentenced to death for robbing individuals violently of a few thousands of naira, it is logical to argue that those who divert billions of naira budgeted for fixing of roads and equipping of hospitals which led to the loss of many innocent lives should face the death penalty.
Notwithstanding the horrendous effect of corruption in the society, we should not be frustrated to support the campaign for the brutalisation of humanity through the death penalty. Even in Nigeria, our experience with murder and armed robbery has proved that the death penalty is not a deterrent for violent crimes. A state that cannot enforce a law that prescribes a punishment of two years for money laundering will frustrate the trial of any member of the ruling class for corruption under a law that provides for the death penalty. While the Criminal Code has prescribed the death penalty for certain offences, the Lagos High Court has held that the execution of the death penalty by firing squad or hanging is illegal and unconstitutional as it violates the fundamental rights of convicts to dignity guaranteed by section 34 of the constitution.
Lest I forget, parents too are no longer the representation of exemplar behaviours. Thousands of parents know that their children are corrupt but won’t speak up. Rather they thank God for giving them “the opportunity”.  Children without any job buy cars and parents are not perturbed.  The role of the family as the first point of socialisation is being challenged by greed just as in some grandeur men of God.  Elite theorists, in spite of their criticisms have noted that the masses are gullible. Unfortunately, Nigerian masses seem to represent this gullibility. There was Occupy Nigeria for increase in fuel but what has happened with the multi-billion cases of corruption?  Nigerians as individuals are still waiting to hold their leaders accountable.
What is to be done?
My conclusion is simple: Nigerians must take their destiny in their own hands. Nigerians must know that corruption does not just happen but it survives on the level of morality at the individual and group levels. Youths must shake themselves out of the bondage of unscrupulous politicians who have nothing to offer but the bastardisation of values. Where are their children? Ask yourselves? Progressive religious leaders must take back religion from the business people that have hijacked it for materialistic gains.

House of Reps member in certificate scandal

 by:
House of Reps member in certificate scandal
CONCERNED citizens of Ningi/Warji constituency of Bauchi State have called on the Speaker of the House of Representatives to investigate allegation of certificate forgery against a member, Abdulrazak Nuhu Bature, by the University of Jos.
In a petition dated November 12th, and addressed to the Speaker, Aminu Tambuwal,124 constituents of Bature said; “we are particularly worried by the seeming insensitivity of the House of Representatives leadership to constitute a committee to investigate the damaging allegations which to our mind cast aspersion on the ethical reorientation and/ or transformation agenda of the federal government and the consequential effect of not having men and women of honour and proven integrity in positions of responsibility.” The petition was submitted at the office of the Speaker on Wednesday.
The University of Jos through its Registrar, Jilli-Dandam, Danjuma had in a letter dated September 7, 2012 urged the National Assembly to disregard Bature’s claim of attending the institution.
“While we draw your attention to this dishonourable act of one of your members, we wish to put you on notice that we have also lodged complaint to relevant government agencies for necessary action,” the university stressed.
Danjuma made good his threat by writing the Director-General, State Security Service, Inspector-General of Police Chairman, EFCC Chairman, ICPC Chairman, INEC and the National Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP.
According to Danjuma, the embattled member presented as part of his credentials, a testimonial and a certificate for Advance Diploma in Public Administration purported to have been issued by the Senate of the University of Jos at an election tribunal before it was referred to the university for verification.
According to the Registrar, the University’s Senate set up a committee which investigated the case and reported that the Bature did not attend the university and could therefore not lay claim to its certificates. The university immediately placed a disclaimer on him in a national newspaper.
He has also been invited by the State Commissioner of Police over alleged forgery but he is yet to honour the invitation.
One of the leaders of the constituency who spoke to The Nation from Bauchi yesterday said, Mr. Yunana Katanga said they are determined to make the member explain the forgery and if culpable, face the law.
Contacted for comments Bature said;”Let them forge ahead. They took me to court several times and failed. Let them go ahead with the recall process. I wish them well.”
The National Assembly has had a history of members with questionable credentials. The first Speaker of the House of Representatives, Salisu Buhari, was forced to step down when it was discovered that his Toronto University degree was forged. Another member of the National Assembly, Senator Evans Enwerem was also disgraced out of the nation’s highest legislative house.
TheNation

OKIRO: Why Security Agencies Can’t Tackle Terrorists


MIKE-OKIRO-0112.jpg - MIKE-OKIRO-0112.jpg
MIKE OKIRO 
JUST LIKE MANY NIGERIANS, MIKE OKIRO, FORMER INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE IS WORRIED ABOUT THE RECURRING SECURITY BREACHES ACROSS THE NATION. FOR OKIRO, THE SECURITY BREACHES MUST NOT BE TAKEN LIGHTLY TO PREVENT A LOOMING STATE OF ANARCHY. IN THIS INTERVIEW WITH YEMI ADEBOWALE, THE RETIRED IGP, WHO IS NOW A SECURITY CONSULTANT, X-RAYS THE CURRENT SECURITY CHALLENGES FACING THE NATION AND OFFERS TIPS ON HOW TO TACKLE THE MENACE.
Many Nigerians are worried by the recurring security breaches in the country. Just this week, the Special Anti-Robbery Squad headquarters in Abuja and the Command and Staff College in Jaji, Kaduna, were attacked by terrorists. What do you make of all these?

The attacks on these two high security areas are a sad note on the security situation in the country, taking into consideration that Jaji is a major military installation and the SARS is a high brow security establishment. We cannot take those breaches lightly. The situation is such that a lot needs to be done. The security agencies are doing their best within the purview of what they have and the environment in which they are working. One cannot presume that security agencies must do everything alone. They need the cooperation and collaboration of members of the public. You can’t sit down and expect security agencies to do everything alone. There must be cooperation from members of the public. The security of the country is not the responsibility of security agencies alone. The public must contribute and assist them to succeed. Every Nigerian should be involved. We should not just sit down and hope that security agencies will do everything.
Many Nigerians are of the opinion that the police and other security agencies are not well equipped to fight terrorism and other crimes in the country. Do you agree with this?

That is part of the point I was making. We have gone past the stage in our development where people use pen and thumb to do things. We now have computer-assisted mechanism to do whatever we want to do. Whatever anyone wants to do in this world now will be assisted by computers and other high tech gadgets. Our security agencies are not properly equipped yet to face the challenges of what we are having now. These criminals or terrorists or whatever you call them watch videos and visit the Internet to plan whatever they want to do. So, security agencies should be ahead of them, not behind. They must be ahead to succeed. Once this is not done, we will just be beating about the bush. For now, terrorist are ahead of security agencies. They don’t have the equipment and training to match these criminals.
Still talking about being ahead of criminals, it seems our security agencies are also behind in terms of existing laws for tackling and prosecuting terrorists. Just last week, the current IGP, Mohammed Dikko Abubakar, said he was not aware of the existence of an anti-terrorism law in Nigeria. Were you surprised?

Maybe he was not well briefed. I am aware of the passage of the law in 2011. I was invited to a television programme sometime last year to discuss the anti-terrorism law. We reviewed the act with Senator Umaru Dahiru and two other people. We talked about the flaws in the law and what security agencies should do with the law. That was after I left service. Probably he did not watch the programme or probably he was not briefed about the anti-terrorism law. We reviewed the law and one of the things I pointed out was that the law did not make provision for centrality of authority. It did not clearly state areas the National Security Adviser should take action or areas the police and other security agencies should take action. I pointed out that there should be a hierarchy or an overall authority. A situation where different security agencies are doing different things and reporting to different authorities does not make room for efficiency and effective operations.
Specifically, what do you think the government should be doing to assist the police in order to effectively tackle crimes in the country?
The government has been doing its best within what is available in its coffers.  For the police and any other organization to do well, there are three essentials things needed. They must be properly trained. Welfare of the personnel must be paramount and they must be properly equipped. So, if any of these three is missing, the organization will not be able to achieve it aims, objectives and mission. Be that as it may, the police is just one of the agencies of government. Security is also key in governance. So, considering our lean resources, you should not expect government to put all our resources into the police. We have challenges from education, roads, agriculture and so many things demanding for funds. We cannot say that because security is faulty, police should get everything. If we divert the entire budget of the country to the police, it will still not be enough. Usually, I give this example, whenever I want to do a security comparison between Nigeria and advanced countries.
A relation of mine was a mayor in the United States. He visited me when I was the IGP; called a press conference and gave me the key to the city. So, I asked him about equipment for the police in his territory of about 30,000 people. He said the police there operate with ten helicopters in a city of 30,000 people. If we want to buy helicopters for Nigerian police based on this calculation, the whole budget of Nigeria won’t be able to do it. In our country of about 167 million people, If we want to have a one police helicopter to 3000 people, then the entire budget of the country won’t be able to do it. The point I am trying to make with this example is that the government cannot put all its money into the police. But essentials things must be given. The essential things that will make the police function within the confines of what is available to the government – good training, equipment and welfare
Back to the failing war against terrorism; it seems that there is a disconnect among security agencies as they battle crime, leading to very low success rate?
Yes, there is a disconnect; when I was IGP, I made presentations on this and I have continued to hammer on this, each time I make presentations. I have always been saying this; that there is no cooperation among security agencies in Nigeria. There is no information sharing among our security agencies. This is very bad. A situation where one security agency thinks that it is superior to other security agencies is bad. It hinders progress. The security agencies are working towards one goal – to provide security for all Nigerians. Despite the fact that they wear different uniforms, they went through the same basic training and diversified to other areas. I always use this example and I will keep using it, when talking about this problem of disconnect among security agencies. A situation where a State State Security operative in a place like Gombe comes across security information, he will pass it on to his Director General in Abuja who will pass it on to the National Security Adviser. The NSA passes it to the IGP who will then pass it on to the police commissioner in Gombe State. A week on two will be lost in this process. I would want to see a situation where the SSS in Gombe gets an information and quickly pass it on to the DPO, and swiftly work together to contain the situation. They should take action immediately and later inform the headquarters. But this is not so now. There is no cooperation among the security agencies. This has been a major drawback on the war against crime and terrorism. Criminals will not wait for you to come after them. A minute means a lot. There should be cooperation in all the states. You don’t have to wait until there is a meeting between the commissioner of police and the SSS chief, before taking action. That cooperation should start right from the grassroots. I want a situation whereby a DPO and the SSS officer at the local government will work together.
You said the entire federal budget cannot fund the needs of the police. So, what should government do to meet the requirements of the police?
I have said it and I will continue to say it. The government should try as much as possible, within what is available, provide the police with the basic things I mentioned earlier.
Some people are not even happy that security took almost 25% of the proposed 2013 budget
It is not still enough. Though, as I said, government still has other areas of need apart from security. But we should prioritise security. If there is no security, will they be able to work? If you lose security, you lose respect. Just as we are talking now, if there is no security, you won’t be able to stay here. Nobody will be here. It is not that the whole budget should go to security agencies; but there should be priority for security.

Looking back at the police you left some years ago, would you say that there has been an improvement?
I think the force is picking up again. At the time I came on board as IGP, the force was a little bit in shambles and I tried to re-build and re-focus it. Some who came after me did not continue from there. That is one thing that is bad with our organisations in Nigeria. When somebody starts something, a successor will jettison it and start something new. He might not finish it; another person will come and start something new again. It continues just like that. Not that we human beings are perfect. We can make mistakes. When a successor comes, he should look at the things on ground and move forward. But to just throw everything, is not good. That was what happened to us. A lot of the things we started were not completed; some abandoned. IGPs can be changed. They can’t be there forever. But there should be continuity of policy.

You tried you hands on politics after retirement. At a point, you were a senatorial aspirant in Abuja under PDP. You lost at the primaries. Why did you go into politics? What was the experience like?
Let me first say that man is a political being. You have to be involved in everything around you. I went into politics for few reasons. First, I wanted to keep myself busy. Two, I wanted to know what it is like, being a politicians. I cannot criticize a system adequately, if I don’t know how it works. If you get into an organization, you will know more about it. Criticizing from outside might be faulty. I went into politics and found out that my fears were right. I could not fit into it. This is because I came from a background where everything has guidelines and rules and regulations to be followed. But in politics, there are no rules. It was there that I found out about all sorts of deceit in politics. In Nigerian politics, two people will sit down telling each other lies. They will be fully aware that they are telling each other lie and will still agree and laugh together. When one leaves, the other one will tell those around that ‘look don’t mind him.’  I was not brought up that way. I was not bruised. I contested for a senatorial seat and lost the primaries. I am still with the party. Some people ran away but I stayed. Some other parties invited but said I won’t go. Some said I should come and take their own senatorial ticket but I refused.
Do you have plans to re-contest for Abuja senatorial ticket?
No, no. I told you that I have had enough experience. Let me just be a simple party member. That is what I want.
I learnt that you now work as Special Adviser on security to the PDP national chairman. Is this true?
Yes, that is my area of specialty
You went into politics to keep yourself busy. Now, you are out of it. What are the things you now do to keep yourself busy?
I have since found out that I have more than enough to keep myself busy, if I had known what I now know. I am now into security consultancy. I am always travelling. They invite me for seminars and lectures on security. I deliver papers. Infarct, my family thinks that I travel too much.
ThisDay