Dec 18, 2012
PressTv- Days
later, the Sandy Hook Massacre, the iconic slaughter of twenty small
children, is now looking like a terrorist attack, not a “murder
suicide.” Was “lone gunman” Adam Lanza a “patsy,” the same word Lee
Harvey Oswald used to describe himself before being “silenced” in
November 1963?
Today, Michael Harris, former Republican candidate for governor of
Arizona and GOP campaign finance chairman, in an internationally
televised news broadcast, cited “Israeli revenge” in, what he called,
“the terrorist attack in Connecticut.”
Harris cited Israeli “rage” against the US and against President Barack Obama. By “Israel,” we mean “Netanyahu.”
The mission was to teach America a lesson, knowing that “America
would take the punishment, keep “quiet,” and let a ‘fall guy’ take the
blame.”
A “fall guy” is another word for “patsy.”
Harris, citing the flood of inconsistencies in the “cover story,”
pointed out the following, “The facts are now becoming obvious. This is
another case where Israel has chosen violence and terrorism where their
bullying in Washington has failed. Israel believes the US “threw them
under the bus,” particularly after the recent Gaza war, allowing Israel
to be humiliated in the United Nations. Their response was to stage a
terror attack, targeting America in the most hideous and brutal way
possible, in fact, an Israeli “signature attack,” one that butchers
children, one reminiscent of the attacks that killed so many children in
Gaza?”
Washington is terrified of Israel, their powerful lobby and its
relationship with organized crime. Now, a key former Senator, Chuck
Hagel, who has helped expose this fact, is likely to be nominated as the
secretary of defense, despite vocal protests from Israel.
Today, Israeli news gave further credence to Harris’ analysis when
they issued the following statements regarding the probable nomination
of Hegel:
“Chuck Hagel’s statements and actions regarding Israel have raised
serious concerns for many Americans who care about Israel,” said the
Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) Executive Director, Matt Brooks. “The
Jewish community and every American who supports a strong US-Israel
relationship have cause for alarm if the president taps Hagel for such
an important post.”
“The appointment of Chuck Hagel would be a slap in the face for every
American who is concerned about the safety of Israel,” he asserted
Citing a 2006 interview with Hegel, the news continued, “The
political reality is…that the Jewish lobby intimidates a lot of people
up here. I have always argued against some of the dumb things they do
because I don’t think it’s in the interest of Israel. I just don’t think
it’s smart for Israel.”
Hagel also said he didn’t think he had ever signed one of the letters
the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) regularly
circulates to demonstrate support for Israel or tough stands against
parties such as Iran.
“I didn’t sign the letter because it was a stupid letter…I’m not an Israeli senator, I’m a United States senator.”
During his interview today, Mike Harris explained his rationale for
looking to Israel as responsible for Sandy Hook, saying “This is exactly
what Israel did in Norway; the political party that voted sanctions
against Israel was retaliated against by a “lone gunman” who killed 77
children. This is what Israel always does, they go after the children.
It is what they do in Gaza every day. It is what was done in Norway. It
is what happened at Sandy Hook. Nobody buys the “lone gunman” story
anymore, not with the Gabby Giffords’ shooting, not with the Aurora
“Batman” shooting, certainly not with Breveik, and certainly not in
Connecticut.”
After Harris’ broadcast, key members of the military and law
enforcement community contacted Veterans Today in full support of
Harris’ analysis.
One three star general is quoted as saying, “Harris hit the nail right on the head and it is about time someone spoke up.”
As days have passed, key issues involving the Sandy Hook terror
attack have been cited as “debunking” the “lone gunman” cover story:
From a viral email that is growing every hour with more reasons to doubt
the official story: According to the official story, Adam Lanza was
found with his older brother’s ID, and it was not stolen. However, older
brother Ryan – whom officials say is very cooperative – claims not to
have even seen his brother since 2010. Where would Adam get this ID? And
why does such use not qualify as a theft?
According to the official story, Adam Lanza was wearing a black
outfit with a mask and bulletproof vest. Why would he want to hide his
identity, and why would he wear a bulletproof vest if he planned to kill
himself?
The medical examiner asserts that all wounds were caused by a rifle
or other long weapon, and police/FBI say that the school was littered
with 223 (rifle) casings. However, Adam Lanza was found dead at the
school with only handguns – a rifle was found in the trunk of his car.
Then he could not have possibly been firing the rifle, and could not
have committed the murders. Who did then?
According to the official story, the killings was tightly confined to
two classrooms. Then why were so many children told to close their eyes
while leaving the building?
Joanne Didonato, the principal’s secretary, called in sick on Friday –
something she rarely does. So presumably, she must have been awfully
ill. Yet she then felt well enough to give an interview. “Of all days,”
she said, emphasizing the strange coincidence.
Why were there such persistent reports that Mrs. Lanza was a
kindergarten teacher, and that she died at the school when the new
official story is that she was not connected to the school and was
killed at home?
What happened to the report that Adam Lanza’s girlfriend and another friend were missing in New Jersey?
What happened to the woodsman in a black jacket and camo pants who
was arrested and handcuffed outside the school? He actually shouted to
parents, “It wasn’t me.” Who was he and what was he doing there?
What happened to the dark van or SUV that the police surrounded in
the parking lot or the maroon sedan with a blown-out back window they
were on the lookout for?
The official story is that Nancy Lanza was a gun collector, who
obeyed the law. But since 20-year-olds are not permitted to buy guns or
ammo or carry guns in Connecticut, why would she give her “autistic” son
access to both guns and ammo?
A child asserts that he/she heard someone say, “Put your hands up,”
followed by the reply, “Don’t shoot.” This indicates that the police
took a suspect into custody inside the school. But if that was Adam
Lanza, how did he kill himself after that point?
Another child asserts that he/she saw a man pinned down to the ground
with handcuffs on. Again, this indicates that the police took a suspect
into custody. If that was Adam Lanza, how did he then kill himself?
Is it reasonable for a geeky 20-year-old to carry two pistols and
hundreds of rounds of ammunition while wearing a bulletproof vest and a
mask?
Did the school have one or more security cameras? What do they show?
Why did a police officer specifically mention on radio that “they’re
coming at me through this wood” followed by a fellow officer saying,
“This is it”?
One officer at the school said, “We’ve got one suspect down.” Who was
that? Down in this situation generally means in custody (on the ground
and cuffed) not dead.
Why is Adam Lanza reported to be a loner when a teenager said
(oxymoronically), “[Lanza and his friends] always gathered alone in a
corner in school”?
Why are Ryan Lanza and his roommates still in custody, and why are the police pretending that it is for their own benefit?
Is it a coincidence that Nancy Lanza’s brother is Kingston Police
Officer James Champion, who lives next door to the former Lanza home?
—
This is only a small percentage of the irregularities noted in what now seems to be more of a cover-up than investigation.
In truth, the public may well just be sick of hearing stories about
“lone gunmen.” Of all possible horrors, this one, even more than the
Benghazi killings, is loaded with political implication, not just “gun
control,” but a clear attack on the security of every American family.
The simplest thing would be to sit back and accept what we are told without examining who gains, who loses and “why now?”
Is Harris right? Would Israel order the deaths of twenty tiny children to make a political point? Have they done this before?
Is Harris right about that too?
Moments ago, Harris phoned me. I asked him if, hours later, he was still willing to back up his statements.
His answer was simple: “You murder children as part of ‘business as
usual,’ you shouldn’t be surprised that when children are murdered,
people look to you.”
News+Rescue
