Friday, 21 December 2012

Money Laundering: You Are Not Above The Law, Court Tells Wale Babalakin



Wale Babalakin Money Laundering: You Are Not Above The Law, Court Tells Wale Babalakin

The embattled Chairman of Bi-Courtney Highway Services Limited, Wale Babalakin on Friday failed in a second attempt to stop the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) from prosecuting him on money laundering charges.
A Federal High Court sitting in Lagos and presided by Justice Ibrahim Buba dismissed Wale Babalakin’s suit seeking, among other reliefs, an order barring the police and the State Security Service from arresting him in connection with charges of money laundering.
Justice Buba said it was wrong for the applicant to approach the court to enforce his fundamental human right when there was a pending criminal charge against him at the state high court. He said the personal liberty of an individual was not absolute. He said it will not augur well for the peace and progress of the society if any person with a criminal charge in a court approaches another to enforce his fundamental human right; nothing that ”nobody is above the law, no matter the person’s position or status”.
He said Mr Wale Babalakin as a Senior Advocate of Nigeria should not be afraid to face the court and, therefore, dismissed his application as lacking in merit.
The Counsel to the EFCC, Rotimi Jacobs had told the court that the commission is vested with the power to investigate, arrest and prosecute persons for financial crimes. He also told the court that Mr Wale Babalakin did not abide by the terms of the administrative bail granted him by the anti-graft agency.
On the issue of Mr Wale Babalakin’s ill-health which his counsel, Wale Akoni made reference to, Mr Rotimi said that there was nothing before the court on the current state of the suspect’s health.
“It is not a case of denial of fundamental human rights but a case of non-compliance to enjoy that right. The suit is intended to gag the EFCC so that they will not take him to court”, Mr Rotimi said.
Before today’s ruling Justice Buba had on Monday December 17, 2012 refused to grant an ex-parte order restraining the EFCC from arresting or detaining Wale Babalakin without hearing from the respondents. Rather, the judge ordered the suspect to serve the respondents to enable them respond to the motion on notice.
Another court had on December 15, 2012 dismissed a similar application by Mr Wale Babalakin for an order of prohibition against the EFCC and the Attorney General of Federation from arraigning him before the Lagos High Court on the grounds that the application was defective as it failed to comply with Order 35 Rule 4 of the Federal High Court Civil Procedure Rules, which require the applicant to depose to an affidavit after serving the court papers on the parties in the suit.
The judge held that failure to depose to such affidavit and file same before the court had robbed the court of its jurisdiction to entertain the matter.
The court vacated the order it earlier granted the applicant permitting him to institute the prohibition suit against the EFCC and subsequently awarded N5, 000 cost against the applicant.
Wale Babalakin, alongside Alex Okoh, Stabilini Visioni Limited, Bi-Courtney Limited and Renix Nigeria Limited are scheduled to appear before an Ikeja High Court on January 17, 2013 to take his plea on a 27-count charge of offences bordering on money laundering preferred against him by the EFCC. The suspects allegedly transferred various sums of money on behalf of the former governor of Delta State, James Ibori, through third parties to some foreign accounts under the guise of purchasing a Challenger Jet Aircraft.
They were to be arraigned before Justice Adeniyi Onigbanjo of the Lagos High Court Ikeja on November 29, 2012. The arraignment was stalled as Mr Babalakin failed to show up, claiming sudden illness that necessitated his hospitalization at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital.
While his lawyers were pleading with Justice Onigbanjo to adjourn the arraignment to enable Wale Babalakin to recover from his illness, he was attempting to stop his trial before Justice Mohammed Idris of the Federal High Court.
The lead defence counsel to Mr Wale Babalakin, Ebun Sofunde has withdrawn from the case, citing personal reasons.
Naijaurban

The Texas School Where Teachers Carry Guns For Protection; Other Schools To Follow Suit


Teachers carry concealed guns here
Teachers carry concealed guns here
In Harrold, a tiny Texas town, children and their parents don’t give much thought to safety at the community’s lone school, mostly because some of the teachers are carrying concealed weapons. The teachers’ mandate is not only to educate the children, but also protect them.
In remote Harrold, the nearest sheriff’s office is 30 minutes away, and people tend to know and trust one another. So the school board voted to let teachers bring guns to school.
“We don’t have money for a security guard, but this is a better solution,” Superintendent David Thweatt said. “A shooter could take out a guard or officer with a visible, holstered weapon, but our teachers have master’s degrees, are older and have had extensive training. And their guns are hidden. We can protect our children.”
Following the unfortunate murder of children at the Connecticut elementary school shooting, lawmakers in a growing number of states including Oklahoma, Missouri, Minnesota, South Dakota and Oregon have said they will consider laws allowing teachers and school administrators to carry firearms at school.
Texas law bans guns in schools unless the school has given written authorisation. Arizona and six other states have similar laws with exceptions for people who have licenses to carry concealed weapons.
Harrold’s school board voted unanimously in 2007 to allow employees to carry weapons. After obtaining a state concealed-weapons permit, each employee who wants to carry a weapon must be approved by the board based on his or her personality and reaction to a crisis, Thweatt said.
Employees also must undergo training in crisis intervention and hostage situations. And they must use bullets that minimise the risk of ricochet, similar to those carried by air marshals on planes.
CaRae Reinisch, who lives in the nearby community of Elliott, said she took her children out of a larger school and enrolled them in Harrold two years ago, partly because she felt they would be safer in a building with armed teachers.
“I think it’s a great idea for trained teachers to carry weapons,” Reinisch said. “But I hate that it has come to this.”
The superintendent won’t disclose how many of the school’s 50 employees carry weapons, saying that revealing that number might jeopardise school security.
The school, about 241 kilometres northwest of Fort Worth near the Oklahoma border, has 103 students from kindergarten through 12th grade. Most of them rarely think about, or remember who is carrying a gun.
“This is the first time in a long time that I’ve thought about it,” said Matt Templeton, the principal’s 17-year-old son. “And that’s because of what happened” in Connecticut.
Thweatt said other Texas schools allow teachers to carry weapons, but he would not reveal their locations, saying they are afraid of negative publicity.
The Texas Education Agency however said it had not heard of any other schools with such a policy. And the Brady Centre to Prevent Gun Violence did not know of any other districts nationwide that allow school employees to carry concealed handguns.
InformationNigeria

22-year-old woman agrees to marry man who murdered her twin sister


A 22-year-old Argentine woman has agreed to marry the man convicted of killing her twin sister two years ago.
Edith Casas insists Victor Cingolani did not murder her sister, a model with whom he also had a relationship.
Cingolani was convicted of Johana Casas’ murder and is serving 13 years in prison in the town of Pico Truncado.
The couple have said they plan to wed on Friday at the prison in the southern province of Santa Cruz, to avoid media attention.
Cingolani is reported as telling Argentine media outlets that his relationship with Johana was “casual”, but that he was “in love” with Edith.
“We have lots of things in common and she isn’t jealous,” Argentine newspaper Clarin quoted him as saying.
“We always talk about Johana, about how she was,” he said.
Edith maintains that Cingolani was unjustly convicted, saying he is “a guy who would not hurt a fly”.
Their mother, Marcelina del Carmen Orellana, said it was clear to her that Edith was “psychologically ill”.
 DailyPost

Civil Society Groups Petition Senate on Demolition of Minanuel Estate, Abuja


By SaharaReporters, New York
Two major civil society groups have called on members of the National Assembly to protect the rights of the citizens of Nigeria in general and the subscribers to the Minanuel Housing estate in Abuja particular, in connection with the recent demolition of 500 housing units in that estate.
In a petition signed by the Chairman of HEDA Resource Centre, Olanrewaju Suraju, and the President of Campaign for Democracy and Women Arise, Joe Okei-Odumakin, the groups recalled that at the time the estate was demolished, it was valued at 10billion Naira.  Development of the estate, which started in 2005, had reached 80% completion.
They drew attention to a report in National Accord newspaper online on December 14 in which the spokesman for Minanuel Investments Ltd, Mr. Chukwuma Ogbuagu, stated that a few days to the demolition, the chairman of the Senate Committee on the FCT, Smart Adeyemi, accused the developer of trespassing into the land.  In a radio programme, the Senator described the land as having been allocated to Senators and called on the firm to liaise with the appropriate authorities.
The petitioners further stated that the developers of the estate claim that all the necessary allocation documents, approvals and permits had been obtained prior to development, and that the Minister of the FCT, Senator Bala Mohammed had issued no notices of a pending demolition.
“If these allegations are proven true, we are appalled that a minister in a democracy who is supposed to have the utmost respect for the rule of law and due process would act in such a contemptuous manner in breach of the fundamental rights of the citizens of the state,” the petition said.
Citing citizens’ rights deriving from the African Charter on Human and Peoples ‘Rights, the Universal Declaration of Human rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural rights, the groups asserted that access to safe and secure housing is one of the most basic human rights
The petition said: “Governments all over the world take the housing needs of their citizens seriously and put in place adequate measures to provide for it.
It is evident that the Nigerian government has not been able to meet this challenge with its ever growing population. In the recently held presidential retreat on housing it was reported that the country is currently having 17 million housing deficit. This single unguided action of an executive and government agencies does not reflect a government that is concerned about how to close this deficit or one that champions the cause of democratic values of due process and rule of law.”
The groups said that it is even more worrisome that an investment of over 10 billion Naira and involving over 500 families would be destroyed and the victims subjected to untold hardships to satisfy the thirst of lawmakers for land acquisition of lawmakers, as inferred from the comments made by Senator Smart Adeyemi and another by the minister that the land has been reallocated.
 

Good roads cause more accidents than bad ones – FRSC

The Federal Road Safety Commission (FRSC) said on Thursday in Abeokuta, Ogun State, that more auto accidents were being recorded on good roads than bad ones across the country.
The Zonal Commander in charge of Lagos and Ogun, Mr. Ademola Lawal made the observation at a meeting of stakeholders in the transportation sector.
“Accidents occur more on good roads than bad roads because drivers usually engage in over speeding to make up for the lost time they spent on bad roads.
Some people are not used to good roads, so we have to continue to educate roads users on constant basis on the need to be cautious while on good roads,” Mr. Ademola Lawal said.
He also said the organization had designed a programme tagged ‘Beyond the Road’ to check the health status of commercial drivers before they embark on any journey.
Lawal added that the FRSC would conduct compulsory test on blood pressure and sight of drivers in all the major parks in the zone to ensure that they were fit to drive.
We will use some agents in commercial buses to caution drivers when they are over speeding and when they refuse, they shall be handed over to the next available FRSC team,” he said.
He further said that health centres would be established in all the parks to check the sight of drivers, adding: “I have never seen a driver using recommended eyeglasses, does it mean they all have good sights?”
Also, the FRSC Sector Commander in Ogun, Ayobami Omiyale promised that the command “shall ensure effective traffic control and monitoring of motorists and provide prompt rescue operations to crash victims.”
Omiyale, who noted that festive seasons usually witness increased human and vehicular movement, advised motorists to obey road rules and regulations.
He particularly advised drivers to guard against over speeding, dangerous driving, overloading, wrongful over taking and driving under the influence of alcohol to prevent accidents.
The sector commander stressed the need for synergy among stakeholders in the transport sector to ensure hitch-free and accident free celebrations.
“Our toll free lines of 122 and 070022553772 could also be called in times of distress; our team will be there on time,” he said.
The Chief Vehicle Inspection Officer (VIO) in the state, Mr. Victor Otuyemi, said reducing road crashes was the collective responsibility of all stakeholders.
He advocated more education and enlightenment programmes for the motoring public to reduce carnage on the highways.
Responding, the NURTW Publicity Secretary in the state, Alhaji Akinwunmi Dauda, called for a review of the process of acquiring drivers’ licence to ensure that only qualified persons got the document.
He commended the FRSC for the proposed health centres, assuring that the project would not be abandoned mid-way.
Akinwunmi promised that drivers in the union would be effectively enlightened on traffic rules and regulations, adding that lessons learnt from the meeting would be transferred to them accordingly.
YNaija

Beyond Oronto Douglas: Irresponsibility As Statecraft By Pius Adesanmi


Pius Adesanmi
These are not the best of times to be an ordinary Nigerian citizen. Hardly a week passes these days without some half-witted douchebag in the rulership upbraiding us for expressing dissatisfaction with the way they are running and ruining our lives. We can ignore the habitual heehawing of ribalds like Doyin Okupe, Labaran Maku, and Reuben Abati and concentrate on some of the more interesting characters in the circles of rulership. There is the archi-corrupt Diezani Allison Madueke, who asked us to shove it with regard to our complaints about fuel subsidy before promptly jetting off to London on a medical safari at our expense. Then came the tragedy of Okoroba and insufferable presidential aides began to crawl out of the woodworks to upbraid Nigerians for asking questions. After tears, after mourning, after regrets, Nigerians began to ask those hard questions required of them by the civic imperative. Nigeria would be truly hopeless if no dissenting and dissentient voices were heard after a brazen, irresponsible privatization of the resources of the Nigerian state by a presidential aide led to the loss of the precious lives of a naval pilot, aides, and two members of the ruling class.

Okoroba has now morphed into its own afterlife of arrogant recrimination of Nigerians by woolly-headed Presidential aides and hangers-on, mostly truculent sidekicks of Oronto Douglas, the principal jamboreelizer and misuser of state resources and the current metaphor of everything that is wrong with the Nigerian presidency. Because of the continuous wetness of the geography behind his ears, Reno Omokri, the President’s Special Assistant for Facebook and Twitter, was the first to rush to town, sending his tongue on careless errands of recrimination. This young fellow, who lived in America and was exposed to the best traditions of civic questioning, has naturally forgotten that experience.
After reprimanding Nigerians for asking questions too soon, he was quick to remind us that the cavalcade of helicopters and other expensive modes of transportation to Okoroba were funded by the mourner and his family. If, down the road, Omokri ever manages to achieve the feat of getting dry behind the ears, he will have sufficient time to rue the silliness of inviting questions that are even more pertinent. With his $400,000 annual salary, President Obama is not in the league of those who could visit Nigeria and charter too many helicopters for his local commute. Nigeria is too damn expensive, way beyond Obama’s level. If he visits Nigeria and charters a harem of helicopters for a private jamboree (funeral, wedding, etc), he will face the dire prospect of returning to America to beg Senator Boehner and other obdurate Senate Republicans to approve an emergency salary increase for him. So, how much is Oronto Douglas’s annual salary that he is able to afford the orisirisi chartered air transportation scenario proposed by Omokri in his irresponsible social media outburst? Not to be outdone, one listserv twat, who claims to run “The Jonathan Project”, one of the numerous food-for-the-boys stunts of the Jonathan Presidency, is amok on Nigerian internet listservs, hounding patriotic citizens like Mr. Ibukunolu Alao Babajide and Dr. Valentine Ojo, while justifying the jejune and rationalizing the risible.
I do not mind the lies of these arrogant presidential aides. I mind the fact that outraged Nigerians in our community of conscience have plugged so deeply into their distraction that we are fast losing another occasion to reflect on the broader dimensions of Okoroba in terms of the tragedy’s implication for the struggle for meaning that is the Nigerian Presidency. The disgrace of Okoroba is the Jonathan Presidency – no, make that the Nigerian Presidency – writ large. Precisely because the Nigerian Presidency defines us all, we cannot abandon her meaning, the content of her character, and the stuff she’s made of to the latest group of buccaneers to hold her hostage under the chairmanship of Dr. Goodluck Jonathan. I emphasize the latest crop of buccaneers to underscore the fact that the current crop of irresponsible characters emptying the Nigerian Presidency of philosophical content in Aso Rock are merely the latest arrivistes in town. They are no originators of a culture of Presidential irresponsibility that has calcified throughout our postcolonial existence into the singular identity of the Nigerian Presidency.
I am saying in essence that irresponsibility is not just about the habitual demission of individual Presidency actors from the common good and the consequent privatization and diversion of the state and her resources to service their bacchanalian proclivities in any given presidential term in the life of the Nigerian state. I am saying that this has been the only building block of the Nigerian Presidency since her inception. I am saying that what every President and his team do is to strengthen the foundation before adding their own block to the edifice of Presidential irresponsibility. I am saying that irresponsibility is the singular framework from which the quotidian practices of the Nigerian state devolve. To the extent that the Presidency is the apex body of that state, irresponsibility is statecraft in the context of Nigeria’s political agency.
Notice that I called the Presidency the apex “body” of our state. If I were talking about other responsible presidencies, say in America, France, South Africa or Ghana, I would have used the word “institution”. The culture of irresponsibility has never allowed the Nigerian presidency to develop into an institution in the real sense of that word. When, for instance, we speak of the Kennedy White House, the Carter White House, the Bush White House, the Clinton White House, the Obama White House, we know that beyond party affiliation and deep-seated political differences, all of these ‘White Houses’ are connected by their subscription to certain transcendental attributes of American self-fashioning, reducible to the philosophical core of buzzwords like “freedom”, “promise”, “values”, “enterprise”, “can-do”, and the sacrosanct “American dream”. In over two hundred years of existence, the American Presidency has evolved as the first institution of state which immediately embodies these immutable attributes of the American being. The state evolves and behaves in such a way as to project and protect these transcendental values of American-ness. And the American Presidency is an institution because these values are greater and grander than any incumbent President and his team – cabinet and aides.
Contrary to these normative attributes of responsible presidencies, the Nigerian Presidency is a transient, ephemeral embodiment of the egomaniacal idiosyncrasies of the incumbent, his cabinet, his aides, and the political jobbers and hangers-on who constitute the President’s bubble. No philosophical core, no transcendental attribute of Nigerian self-fashioning links the Obasanjo Aso Rock, the Yar’Adua Aso Rock, and the Jonathan Aso Rock in the sense in which I have sketched out what connects successive American White Houses. In the absence of an enduring deontology of responsibility, every Nigerian President and his team approaches Aso Rock not from the perspective of being custodians of the sacred, great, and grand values of the Nigerian people but as guarantors of the immediate prebendal moment of their ilk and political benefactors – even if such benefactors are convicted criminals.
Once they invest the Presidency with this narrow vision, this baser instinct, the President and his aides become greater and grander than the collective will, vision, and aspirations of the Nigerian people. From here, it is open sesame to irresponsibility as statecraft and to crass personalization of the state and her resources. From here, it’s only a matter of time before we get to Okoroba. This is not just pure theoretical talk. When a Presidency is a genuine institution, she recognizes the power and value of symbolism. Presidential symbolism devolves mainly from the personal example of the incumbent. His style, his preferments, his priorities, when collectively adopted and projected by his team, become symbolic expressions of the character of the state. What sort of symbolism have President Jonathan and his team been sending out to the Nigerian people?
The answer is simple. It is the symbolism of galling irresponsibility. You wonder in whose brain the idea of a new Presidential banquet hall – with the attendant metaphors or gorging and bacchanals amidst and impoverished populace – germinated and how a President could have approved such an irresponsible project at this material time; you wonder in whose brain the idea of a brand new N16 billion mansion for the Vice President germinated and how a President could have approved such an irresponsible project at this material time; you wonder how a president comfortably lives with the idea of his weekly Federal Executive Council meetings being a “contract bazaar” (apologies to Sonala Olumhense) where mind-boggling contracts are irresponsibly parceled out to cronies week after week; you wonder what message, what symbolism the Vice President imagines he is putting out there when he marries off two daughters and allows flat screen television sets and laptops to be distributed as souvenirs to wedding guests.
Only yesterday, jamboree weddings of President Yar’Adua’s daughters were the talk of the town. Where are they today? Vanity of vanities, saith the preacher. Is Vice President Namadi Sambo aware of the transience of these things? Is he aware of the message of crass and repugnant materialism he is sending to our youth? Does he know that his wedding guests are the same people who were all groveling before Turai Yar’Adua at her daughters’ weddings but will not even greet the same Turai today? Does he know that these same wedding guests will consign those TV sets and laptops to the dustbin whenever they rush to the embrace of the next President and his Vice President? Does he remember that Ojo Maduekwe, an avowed Yar’Adua loyalist who, one could have sworn, would plead to be buried with his principal as the king’s horseman, was screaming and describing himself as a “little Jonathan” even before Yar’Adua’s bones had cooled down sufficiently in the grave? Does Vice President Sambo understand these things? Does he think?
This is what you get when the Presidency is no institution. It becomes a hollow bubble of baser instincts, effete materialism, and outsized egos elevated above the common good. Think of it this way: when was the last time you heard the name of any of President Obama’s immediate White House staff in the public domain? Hardly anything in French politics and culture escapes my radar. Yet, I don’t believe that I know the names of President Hollande’s immediate Elysée staff. I am not sure that any of my friends currently living in France - Yommi Oni, Tunde Biade, Dominic Okutue – can name President Holland’s immediate aides at the Elysée.  At the White House, at the Elysée, the President’s aides are just regular, self-effacing civil servants toiling quietly for the people of America and France at the behest of the President. It is highly unlikely that any of them would organize a wedding or a funeral for which the American state or the French state would stand still. It is not imaginable that any of them would organize a personal jamboree that would have State Governors, Ministers, Parliamentarians, etc, abandon their duty posts for the roll call at the venue of the jamboree. And it is absolutely impossible that the resources of the American or French military would be irresponsibly diverted for private purposes because a civilian, a mere aide in the Presidency, is throwing a party. Above all, it is not imaginable that presidential aides in France and America can become overnight billionaires dragooning the state into their private affairs.
Why has this happened in Nigeria? Our presidency not being an institution is only half of the explanation. The other half of the explanation is that once the private bubble of egos is consolidated around the president, the incumbent and those within that bubble become the most powerful custodians of the prebendal system we operate. In this sort of system, even an aide in the presidency becomes the custodian and guarantor of access to the ultimate spoils of office, to be courted like a demi-god by political office holders way beyond his level. This crazy system explains why Governors, Senators, and Ministers abandoned the Nigerian state and outpaced Usain Bolt to Okoroba at the behest of a mere aide of the president. It was never about the funeral of the faithful departed. It was all about nurturing their continuous access to the Presidency-as-guarantor of prebends. Before Oronto Douglas, there were Yar’Adua’s Tanimu Yakubu and Obasanjo’s Andy Uba.
So long as we, the people, fail to sustain the struggle for a redefinition of the Presidency and a constitutional redesigning of her role – she is currently too powerful, so absurdly powerful – Aso Rock will continue to throw up irresponsible presidential houseboys with whom Governors, Ministers, and Senators will have to play footsie in order to guarantee strategic access to the cookie jar. But for the fact that it would amount to asking him to entertain Abu with Abu’s money, I would have joined the calls for Oronto Douglas to be made to cough out the cost of replacing the naval helicopter that we lost before being summarily dismissed from office. But we know that he cannot afford this from his honest salary. It will only provide him with another opportunity to send his hands on an errand into the cookie jar.
All stakeholders in Nigeria’s community of conscience have an urgent struggle at hand. I hope Pastor Tunde Bakare and the Odumakins are listening to the need to place this struggle at the forefront of the preoccupations of the SNG; I hope CACOL, Campaign for Democracy and other genuine civil society groups are listening; I hope the collective children of anger are listening and are prepared to sustain the struggle to redefine the Nigerian presidency in their social media spheres; I hope Nigeria’s progressive columnists are listening; I hope Sahara Reporters, Premium Times, the Nigerian Village Square, and Punch are all listening. They must all listen and act because this phenomenon of irresponsibility as statecraft gives us a jamboree state which profoundly insults all of us in our sovereign Nigerian-ness. The time is now to make it clear to these misbehaving boys and girls in the political class that we are no longer going to tolerate the jamboree instinct which collectively holds them hostage like cocaine addiction insofar as they privatize the Nigerian state to service that instinct.
It’s just that they have no capacity for critical thought. Otherwise, they would be able to see the holistic picture of the Nigerian state which emerges from the following scenarios. When they travel abroad – as is always the case with President Jonathan – it’s a jamboree. When one of them returns from a medical safari abroad as was the case with David Mark, they all abandon their duty posts and troop to the airport for a reception jamboree. One week, they are in Uyo for Akpabio’s 50th birthday jamboree. The following week, they mass-migrated to Kaduna for Namadi Sambo’s TV and laptop wedding jamboree. One week later, they are all in Okoroba for Oronto Douglas’s jamboree. Next week, one of them could wake up and decide to “turn the back” of his great grandfather who died just after the second World War and the same set of characters will use the resources of state to charter helicopters and private jets, abandon the work of the Nigerian people, and head out to Ibadan or Abeokuta for yet another jamboree. It is time for us to make it clear that we’ve had enough of the jamboree state that is Abuja.
Saharareporters

INEC De-Registers IBB Party,Two Others



Despite the controversies surrounding the deregistration of 28 political parties in Nigeria by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) on Friday deregistered three more parties.
In a press statement signed by the Secretary of the commission, Abdullahi Kaugama, INEC said it drew its power from the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and the Electoral Act, 2010 (As amended).
The affected political parties according to the statement are: African Renaissance Party (ARP); National Democratic Party (NDP) linked with former Military Head of Syaye,Gen Ibrahim Babangida; National Transformation Party (NTP).
According to Mr Kaugama, the de-registration of both African Renaissance Party and National Democratic Party is premised on the allegations that the composition of National Executive Committee (NEC) of the parties fail to meet the requirements of Section 223(1) and (2) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (As Amended).
INEC also alleged that the parties have “no verifiable Headquarters office contrary to Section 222(f) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (As amended)” and have “not won a seat in the National and State Assemblies”
The statement said the National Transformation Party (NTP) was deregistered because the composition of National Executive Committee (NEC) of the party fails to meet the requirements of Section 223(1) and (2) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (As Amended) and the NTP has not won a seat in the National and State Assemblies.
CKNNigeria