Saturday, 2 February 2013

Lady Gaga’s Former Personal Assistant Tells Court; ‘I Slept With Her’


Lady-Gaga-Gives-Deposiiton-in-Ex-Assistant-Wage-Lawsuit
Lady Gaga’s former personal assistant, Jennifer O’Neill is suing the ‘Edge of Glory’ singer for unpaid overtime, news sources recently said.
New details have now emerged that Jennifer even went as far as sleeping in the same bed as the singer/songwriter.
According to radaronline.com, O’Neill claims that: “I was by her side virtually 24 hours a day, seven days a week.”
She continued: “That includes sleeping in the same bed with her. Because she did not sleep alone.”
Although, the two women were not s*xually involved, but O’Neill is highlighting the extent to which she was at the singer’s beck and call.
Radaronline.com found out the intimate details of this on-going court case from a deposition obtained by The New York Post.
The mother monster allegedly owes her former employee $393,000 plus damages for her work from 2009 to 2011.
O’Neill also stated: “Unlike anybody else on that tour, I did not have my own hotel room. I was not asked if I wanted my own hotel room.”
“I had no privacy, no chance to talk to any family, no chance to talk to any friends, no chance to have s*x if I wanted to have s*x. There was no chance to do anything,” the former assistant said under oath.
Lady Gaga is furious at her claims and has blasted her ex-PA, calling her “f*cking hood rat who is suing me for money that she didn’t earn.”
InformationNigeria

5 ways you’re accidentally making everyone hate you


by David Wongi_really_hate_you

See, there is an old saying: Hate is not the opposite of love. Apathy is. For many people, you’d be better off telling them to fuck off, because at least then you’re acknowledging that they matter.
Have you recently had friends, co-workers, or strangers suddenly get pissed off at you for what seemed like no reason at all? Maybe you told yourself that they were overreacting or being too sensitive, or that they had no right to be angry when you clearly didn’t mean to do whatever you did (and in fact aren’t even sure what it was). If you’re a socially inept type like me, I bet you’ve had this happen within the last month.
Well, I’m here to help. Fortunately, I am the nation’s foremost expert on social missteps, with more than 30 years of experience in the field (some of you know me as the best-selling author of I Couldn’t Help But Notice Your Father’s Corpse Had a Boner: The Psychology of the Socially Awkward Man, MacMillan, 2008), and I have found that the answer to “Why is everyone suddenly mad at me?” is usually one of the following.
Hint: It’s almost always about power.

#5. It’s Not What You Said, It’s What You Didn’t Say

For those of us who aren’t great with people, we figure that silence is always the safest bet. If you’re an introvert, you spend so much of your time wishing that other people would just shut the hell up that you figure you’re doing everyone a favor. So, you run into a co-worker at the mall and think it’s better to pass by in silence than do an awkward stop-and-chat that you’d probably screw up anyway.
Then, after you pass by this person, you hear them in the aisle behind you mutter, “Asshole.”
So What’s the Problem?
This is literally the most frequent social mistake I see in my day to day. You didn’t respond to the party invitation. You didn’t reply to their funny text with a smiley. You didn’t wish them a happy birthday. Now they’re bitter and you’re confused because, well, who would ever assume that silence is an insult?
Lots of people. In fact, to certain personality types, not speaking is the most bitter insult possible. Yes, worse than “shitblimp.”
If you’re confused, think of it this way: If you apply for a job, which is worse — a rejection letter, or no reply at all? The former is bad, but the latter is dismissive, and that’s a thousand times worse. (Note: By far the angriest reaction I get to hate mail is when I don’t reply at all.) That’s how some people take your failure to speak to them — like you didn’t even open their resume before tossing it in the trash.
See, there is an old saying: Hate is not the opposite of love. Apathy is. For many people, you’d be better off telling them to fuck off, because at least then you’re acknowledging that they matter.
So Keep in Mind …
This is about power. Everything is.
The offended parties are assuming that you think you’re so high and mighty that they don’t even rate a response, and that your silence is a kind of power play intended to let them know that. And if you think it’s weird that anyone would interpret a casual everyday interaction as a power play, well, hang on to your ass, because you’re about to discover something incredibly important about the world.
For instance, another way you’ve probably earned instant hatred from someone is …

#4. You Accidentally Asserted Power Over Them

Let’s take a really common situation: You get so drunk one weekend that, while having back seat sex with a stranger, you start uncontrollably shitting all over your car. You find out later that cleaning the stains from the upholstery will cost $200.
So you’re at work the following Monday and you’re telling your sex shit story to the guy in the next cubicle, because why not? It’s a funny story. But for some reason, the guy starts avoiding you after that. And no, it’s not because he was disgusted by the story — he tells worse stuff every day.
So What’s the Problem?
You just asserted your power over him. You didn’t do it on purpose. But you did it anyway, and it’s the sort of thing we accidentally do all the time.
In this particular example, you told a story that involved A) you having sex, B) doing it in a car, and C) an expensive clean-up bill. Meanwhile, the guy you told the story to is a single dad who A) hasn’t had sex in three years, B) can’t afford a car, and C) can’t waste $200 on drunken mistakes because he has a kid.
So in his eyes, you’re like that douchebag at your high school reunion who desperately tries to wedge a dozen stealth boasts into the conversation: “And then while I was in PARIS I found out my MAID accidentally broke a $5,000 VASE and my wife was late for her PHOTO SHOOT because SHE’S A MODEL and I had to hire a TAILOR because every pair of pants I buy is TOO TIGHT IN THE CROTCH.” That guy is a douchebag because he’s clearly trying to remind you that he is in a higher social and economic position than you — he has the kind of “problems” you would kill to have. He is, in other words, trying to assert his power over you. That’s why we hate people like him.
So Keep in Mind …
This unspoken power dynamic is always at play, whether you acknowledge it or not. In any conversation between two people, one person is going to be more successful than the other, or more attractive, or smarter, or physically stronger, etc. — there are all of these invisible “ranks” where one of you has risen over the other on society’s ladder. Both of you will be aware of them, but neither of you is allowed to mention them.
For many of us who are insecure about our “rank,” the subject is basically an open wound. So not only must the subject be avoided, but courtesy demands that the higher person has to pretend to be the lower. So, this leads to the absurd situation where you can be talking to the dude who won the Nobel Prize in astrophysics, but the second he looks at you and says, “I’m smarter than you,” you will hate him for life — even though both of you know it’s true. The boss who acts like your buddy and phrases his or her assignments as requests (“Hey, can you get that report over to accounts by the end of the day?”) is cool, while the boss who says, “Do what I say because I’m the boss and you’re just a minimum wage peon” is an asshole … even though nothing changed other than the phrasing.
This bizarre charade seems to go double for women — this is why pretty female comedians like Tina Fey pretend to be ugly and why Jennifer Lawrence has to make constant jokes about how gross and ugly she is, just minutes after posing for yet another magazine cover.
The trouble with us less-than-social types is that we assume we’re never the person in power, in any situation. That’s why it’s so easy for us to fall into this — if you were never one of the cool kids, you assume that everyone is confident but you, that they don’t have these open wounds you can accidentally touch. So, you freely tell a story about what a bitch your mom is being, and all the other guy can think is, “Really? Mine died of cancer a year ago.”
But the thing you have to remember — and this really goes for anything on this list — is that the fact that it was accidental really means nothing. Any interaction that results in other people feeling worse about themselves will still count against you in your “Why I don’t like talking to this person” score. I’m not saying it’s right, I’m just explaining why they don’t invite you to parties anymore.

#3. They Think You Owe Them

Have you ever broken up with somebody and had them bafflingly claim, “I can’t believe you would just leave me like that! After everything I’ve done for you!”
Or did you once refuse to do a favor for somebody for what seemed like a good reason (say, you couldn’t help them move because you had work that day), only to see them get really, really pissed off? Almost to the point that they’re acting like you were paid for the work in advance and then didn’t follow through? Like they thought you owed it to them?
Or maybe the other person has suddenly stopped speaking to you, making it clear that you’ve wronged them somehow and thus “owe” them an apology or some other form of restitution. This may even cause you to think they should apologize to you for overreacting, creating a stalemate that lasts until the day one of you refuses to attend the other’s funeral.
So What’s the Problem?
There’s a really good chance that the last person who got annoyed with you for seemingly no reason at all did it because you failed to pay a debt you didn’t even know you owed. There’s this weird thing where in most relationships, and maybe in every relationship at one point or another, both parties think the other side is in debt to them.
Most bad marriages work that way. The wife thinks, “This guy was a lonely mess before I came along, who knows where he’d be if it wasn’t for me rescuing him! Probably dead!” Meanwhile, the guy thinks, “I’m the breadwinner, I gave her this nice house, if not for me she could have wound up with some scumbag who beats her! Probably to death!” Both of them think they’re the martyr in the relationship, selflessly sacrificing while the other does nothing but take. Each is shocked and pissed off when they find out that the other person is working from a different balance sheet.
Your workplace is probably like this as well — everybody in your department thinks they heroically keep the place afloat with their tireless labor, while the boss thinks you’re a bunch of slackers for whom the company generously puts food on the table. You’re shocked and insulted when the company heartlessly announces layoffs (“Where’s the loyalty?!?”), and the boss is shocked and insulted when any of you quit without notice (“That ungrateful bastard!”).
Hey, do you remember that Simpsons ”Poochie” episode where Comic Book Guy is outraged about the declining quality of the show, and the following exchange happens?
Comic Book Guy: As a loyal viewer, I feel they owe me.
Bart: For what? They’re giving you thousands of hours of entertainment for free. What could they possibly owe you? If anything, you owe them.
Comic Book Guy: Worst episode ever.
Guess how many people have written to me saying that I “owe” them because I wrote a free article they didn’t like. It’s in the thousands.
So Keep in Mind …
The key is that in every case, the other person desperately wants you to be in debt to them. Because, you guessed it, that would give them power over you (who has the power, the bank or the borrower?).
But, again, they can’t be up front about how or why they perceive you to be in their debt — they just get angry when you fail to “pay.” And once again, you’re left with someone who’s pissed off at you for what to you seems like no reason at all.

#2. You Wasted Their Time

All you did was email your boss with a simple question or idle thought, and she jumped down your throat! What a bitch!
Then, later that night, you popped into your buddy’s house unannounced, and like one minute later he’s all acting annoyed, opening the door and saying, “Well, good to see you!” like he’s ushering you out! What a dick!
Or maybe you’re on the other end of the situation in the first entry — you messaged an acquaintance with a “happy birthday” and you got cold, dead silence in return. But you know they ain’t no goddamned introvert, they talk to a hundred people a day! What a hell-shitting cockhitler!
So What’s the Problem?
If you’ve been paying attention up to this point, you’re already trying to figure out how this ties in to the power thing. Well, in the first example, the boss was way too busy to put up with your bullshit. In the second, your friend clearly was too busy to watch you smoke a bong and talk about Breaking Bad for three hours. In the third, the dude got too many birthday wishes to reply to them all. But in each case, due to the complicated power dynamics at play, they weren’t allowed to openly say so.
After all, that would be effectively saying that they’ve prioritized some other interaction over yours. That would mean A) they have the power to dictate your interactions and B) other people have power to get in line ahead of you. “I’m important and busy, you are just one of the lesser peasants begging for my attention.”
Wait, it gets worse. Because at the exact same moment they made you feel powerless, they also feel like the powerless party, because they’re so besieged by people making demands on their time. That’s why they got pissed at you. Sure, you can say, “Well, being busy is no excuse to be a dick!” just as a billionaire could tell a homeless guy that losing a pair of shoes is nothing to get upset about. An extreme shortage is never something to get emotional about when you’re not the one suffering from it.
I’ll use myself as an example. The last article I wrote got about 6 million hits, and I swear that every one of those people messaged me four or five times each, many demanding that I personally debate them on the subject point by point. At the exact same time, the movie they made about my ridiculous book became available for download, which as you can imagine generated a whole second stream of messages that spilled across my personal email, my work email, my personal Facebook account, my two work Facebook accounts, Yahoo Instant Messenger, the Cracked forums, the Cracked forums private messaging system, Twitter, and my cellphone. Checking all of those channels is a frantic blur of sorting and prioritizing and deleting, knowing that at any given moment I’m causing disappointment and frustration to dozens of people who are waiting to hear from me, many of whom can’t do their jobs until they do.
Now, quick show of hands: How many of you actually feel sorry for me? OK, now how many of you were annoyed by the above paragraph and interpreted it as one of those stealth boasts we mentioned before (“Boohoo! I’m too famous! Waaah!”)? Yeah, that’s what I thought. And that’s the point — there’s no good way for a busy person to tell you they don’t have time for you. It always comes with the implication that they’re a bigger deal than you are. And as we established earlier, the only thing worse is to say nothing.
So Keep in Mind …
The person who is being terse with you, or who is clearly screening your calls, is often in an impossible situation. They’re coming off as flaunting their power to screen you, while from their point of view, they have no power at all — they spend all of their time seeing to the needs of the crowd. So, the most good-hearted of busy people just try to deal with your thing, quickly answering your question while silently gritting their teeth and thinking, “It would have taken him five seconds to Google this.”
If that sounds like they’re making you pay for someone else’s behavior, well, they are. That’s the way it works — prior offenses count, even when it was someone else who committed them. The cashier at Arby’s got annoyed when you pointed out that their logo looks like a dick because she hears that joke six times a day. Remember: You are nothing more than one link in somebody else’s chain of human interactions. A chain that occasionally rubs them raw.

#1. You Assumed That Because You Were OK With a Situation, Everybody Was

This is the one that is by far the most likely to sneak up on you. Also, it exists at all levels — between roommates, friends, spouses, ethnic groups, nations.
In the office, this usually turns up as some pointless new rule that seems to come out of the fucking blue — a memo says from now on nobody can adjust the thermostat without asking a supervisor. Another announces that the Christmas party is now the “winter holiday” party. In a relationship, it’s the partner suddenly deciding after several years that they no longer want Friday to be meatloaf night.
You get the idea — everything was going along absolutely perfectly fine, the system was running as intended, and suddenly they’re making these arbitrary demands. You then hear yourself saying things like:
“Why do they have to rock the boat just when things were going good?”
“Why complain now, when we’ve always done it this way?”
“I don’t have a problem, you’re the one who’s screaming!”
So What’s the Problem?
Let’s start small: In a previous article, we talked about the classic male/female conflict over not putting the toilet seat down. The reason it’s such a sore subject in some couples is that, as we explained, it demonstrates that the man simply isn’t factoring in the woman’s needs at all. It’s not that he intentionally wants to make her life worse, or that he hates her or feels any negative emotion whatsoever. Why would he? The seat is where he likes it, he has the power, everything is fine. It’s not even that he disagrees on the issue; it’s that he refuses to acknowledge it as an issue at all.
This will happen to you. You will be on one side of a conflict that does not feel like a conflict to you, because that is the conflict. Trust me, there’s a great chance you’ll be oblivious to it until it’s too late. Entire governments have fallen this way.
Let me use myself as an example again, so it doesn’t come off like I’m accusing anyone:
After being raised as an evangelical Christian, I for years assumed that Christianity was the default — there were Christians, and then there were weirdos. I was shocked when in college I found that some people get offended when you tell them, for instance, that their recovery from surgery was a “miracle.” “No,” they’d say, “it was actually the result of three months of excruciating rehab, incredibly expensive doctors, and a loving and supportive family who worked extra jobs to pay for it all.” I sneered and thought of them as overly sensitive PC hippie atheists, because I never considered how I would feel if, say, a Scientologist insisted that the ghost of L. Ron Hubbard wrote my books for me and that I owed all of my success to him. Enjoy your eternal hellfire, Zooey!
Now check the headlines — any controversy having to do with gay marriage, or school prayer, or any social hot-button issue involves the group who’s in control acting just like I did — baffled that any other groups are dissatisfied with the “normal” way of doing things (“Oh, so now we can’t keep the TEN COMMANDMENTS monument in the COURTHOUSE? But it’s ALWAYS BEEN THERE!”). And in many cases, the baffled people don’t feel any more malice than the guy did when he left the toilet seat up. My favorite blog in the world gives some great examples where opponents of desegregation or gay marriage have always insisted that they don’t hate the group whose rights they’re opposing. In many cases, they mean it honestly — “I’m not angry at anyone, I just want to leave things the way they are. Which incidentally involves me having all of the power.”
So Keep in Mind …
It’s easier than you think to find yourself on the wrong side of this in your everyday life. You like to stay in on weekends, your girlfriend/boyfriend likes to go out. After a year or so, they give up and stop trying to get you off the sofa every Saturday. You interpret this as the relationship settling in just how you like it; meanwhile, they’re so miserable that they’re rehearsing their breakup speech. “But, but … everything was going great!”
Sure it was. For you. You didn’t perceive yourself as being in a position of power because that is the main advantage of power – that you don’t have to think about it. You don’t think about money when you’re eating at a restaurant. But you sure as fuck think about it when you’re too poor to eat.
And out of all of the pitfalls on this list, this is by far the worst, because it means that you can absolutely make other people hate you without lifting a finger. Hell, you can do it without even knowing it. Which means that, unfortunately, avoiding it requires constant vigilance.
It’s exhausting, I know. But hey, at least you’ll have fewer people screaming at you.
YNaija.com

$67bn Controversy: FG Must Apologise To Ezekwesili, Explain To Nigerians – Utomi


Pat_UtomiPolitical economist, Prof. Pat Utomi, has waded into the war of words between the Federal Government and a former World Bank Vice President (Africa), Dr. Obiageli Ezekwesili asking the FG to immediately apologise to her.
Utomi said the FG must, as a matter of obligation, explain to Nigerians the accountability questions raised by Ezekwesili regarding the Excess Crude Account and $67bn (about N10.6trn) in foreign reserves.
Information Nigeria recalls that Ezekwesili had in a speech delivered at the 42nd convocation of the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, demanded accountability by the Federal Government on the issues of poor management of oil revenue, especially as it affects the Excess Crude Account and the Foreign Reserve Account inherited from the Obasanjo administration of which she was a kitchen cabinet member.
Utomi said rather than cash in on her request to enlighten Nigerians on the issue in question, the FG, on Sunday, described the allegation of mismanagement as “factually incorrect, outlandish and clearly fictitious.”
Utomi while lampooning the FG for attacking Ezekwesili rather than the critical posers she raised, said she had only performed her duty as a proper citizen of Nigeria, adding that she deserved a better answer from the FG.
He said the government owed it as an obligation to her and all Nigerians to explain how it spent the oil revenue.
“What she did was right. She deserves to know; that is why we have the Freedom of Information Act. Governments all over the world would take advantage of such challenges to explain things to their citizens.
“I wrote on my tweeter page that from its response so far on this issue, the FG is playing Abacha in mufti. The FG must apologise to Ezekwesili and explain to Nigerians what happened to the money,” he said.
InformationNigeria

Opinion: Yakubu Yusuf verdict – Justice Abubakar Talba is not guilty of anything

by Nana Nwachukwu

Even if the judge was present at the transaction that resulted in the crime, he/she cannot attempt to give evidence or add material except that which has been provided by the parties. A judge can only convict on the strength of the case and nothing more.
I have read with interest the opinions and emotions arising from the judgment delivered by Justice Abubakar Talba at the FCT High Court, Abuja on the 28th January 2013. Most Nigerians are calling for Talba’s head and demanding a re-trial or simply cursing him outright.
Did Justice Talba err in his judgment? I think not!
We have seen several prominent Nigerians get what we the laymen will call lighter sentences. The likes of Cecilia Ibru, Diepreye Alamiesegha, Bode George, Tafa Balogun and hief Lucky Igbinedion. Is the judiciary corrupt? Hmmnnnn maybe…
Though I am not holding brief for EFCC, NBA, NJC or Justice Talba himself, I wish to correct a few fallacies.
1. The judgment delivered by Justice Talba was the maximum sentence prescribed by the Penal Code for Criminal misappropriation which was the crime that the Pension Scam boss in the person of Mr. John Yusuf was charged for. The EFCC proffered a charge under Section 308 & 309 of the Penal Code (Northern States) Federal provisions Act Cap 345 LFN 1990. Section 309 being the punishment section clearly states
“Whoever commits a crime of misappropriation shall be punished with an imprisonment term which may be extended to two years or with fine or both”
The questions that are left to ask are the following;
a. Why did the EFCC bring a charge of criminal misappropriation? There are elements of fraud, conspiracy to defraud, obtaining by false pretences, administrative mismanagement, stealing and the list goes on that could have nailed the culprits in separate counts and push for consecutive sentences which would have been at the discretion of the judge.
b. Why did the EFCC go to the FCT High Court? The Federal High Court has the capacity to entertain the charges I have listed above firstly as a result of the charge and secondly as a result of the parties involved in the crime. By going to the Federal High Court, the Criminal Code would have been applicable and available for more offences to tie up the culprits with higher sentences.
2. There has been this fallacy that the EFCC Act provides 25 years for the crime that the culprits were charged for, this is a blatant lie. Section 14 through 18 of the EFCC Act does not make any such provisions. The maximum punishment in the EFCC Act is Three (3) Years.
3. There has been this fallacy that it is the duty of the Judge to mete out severe punishments to culprits. Let me put it this way, the burden of proof for any crime is ‘beyond reasonable doubt’. A prosecutor should not leave loopholes for an accused person to wriggle free. Make use of the allowed law with the maximum punishment available. It is trite law that a judge cannot descend into the court arena. Even if the judge was present at the transaction that resulted in the crime, he/she cannot attempt to give evidence or add material except that which has been provided by the parties. A judge can only convict on the strength of the case and nothing more. Where a judge chooses to give additional information at a trial, he becomes a witness and steps down from the bench while the case is transferred to another Judge. This is based on the principle of ‘nemo judex in causa sua’.
So pray, with the above information, what would the judge have done? The common idea in Nigeria is that once a case is ruined, it is the judge. I submit that we have corrupt judges but then let us not sacrifice reasoning on the altar of ignorance. The prosecution was either too lazy to nail the coffin of the culprits tightly or they exchanged the bodies in this coffin for cash.
If we really want to keep a lid on corruption, then we need our laws revised with stiffer sentences…and that is my humble submission folks.
YNaija.com

How family lost 4 kids to late night fire in Kaduna

by Maryam Ahmadu-Suka, Kaduna
In a tragic incident in Kaduna, four children were killed in a late night fire. Three of the children are of the same parent, and their mother was in the hospital to give birth to her sixth child when the incident happened.
Mrs. Maryam Mohammed left her house in Kakuri, a suburb of Kaduna South Local Government area to give birth to her sixth child through a Caesarean Section (CS). But a very devastating news awaits her. Three of her children, and that of her friend were consumed by a late night fire, which left the entire neighbourhood in mourning. The trouble, Weekly Trust heard from the neighbours, is how to convey the news to her.
Weekly Trust gathered that Maryam was on admission at the St Gerald’s Hospital where she gave birth while the husband Aminu Mohammed was with her to see her condition and that of the the new born baby when the incident happened.
 The fire burnt everything in the two-room apartment, including four of the children who were sleeping inside. Residents tried to force the door open as the children were screaming for help, but could not succeed because the door, made of steel, had melted from the heat of the fire.
 Weekly Trust gathered that the fire which started around 11pm on Thursday, threw residents of the area into pandemonium as they ran from one house to the other looking for water to put out the raging inferno.
 The fire claimed the lives of Sadiya, Ramatu and Mansir as well as that of Khalid, son of Maryam’s friend.
 A large crowd of sympathizers were helping out to salvage what was left of the family belongings.
 Comments such as “it has finished for this family”, “how can the woman cope with such a loss” and so on were heard from neighbours and symphatisers who gathered at the scene of the incident.
 Maryam’s sister, Aisha Kabiru,  was trying to explain what happened to Weekly Trust but was overwhelmed by tears and could not go on.
However, another sister to Maryam Mohammed, Zainab Mohammed Garba confirmed that four of her sister’s children died in the fire.
 “They were five inside the house when the fire started. One of them was not my sister’s child, he was her friend’s son, Khalid. The only one who survived among my sisters children is five-year-old Abdulrahman, but Sadiya, 13, Ramatu, 7, and Mansir all died in the fire.
 “My sister gave birth on Wednesday through Caesarian Section (CS) so the husband went to stay with her in the hospital that very night when the fire incident happened. I don’t know what caused the fire, because people living in the area said there was no light at that time,” she explained.
 She noted that her sister is a civil servant working with the Igabi Local government secretariat.
 A neighbour, Hannatu Terry, whose house was also affected by the fire, said she was woken up by the smoke emanating from the house around 11pm on Thursday night.
 “I normally take sleeping pills when am going to sleep so that I can sleep well, because I am hypertensive. So on that fateful Thursday, like always, I took my pills and went to bed around 9.30pm.
 “I was awoken from my bedroom by the smoke from the fire which engulfed my house; by the time I got to my sitting room; the whole place was on fire. At that time I did not know the fire was coming from my next door neighbour’s house.
 “I was confused and started shouting, that was when my two children who were in the house with me woke up and we all came out shouting, so as to alert other neighbors. People came out with buckets of water to help put out the fire,” she said.
 A crowd made up of mostly women who gathered at the entrance of the house told our correspondent that the mother of the children had not been told about what happened for fear that it will worsen her condition.
 They described the family who hailed from Kogi state as peace loving, saying that they were always ready to extend a helping hand to their neighbours.
 A Senior Secondary School student in the compound, who did not want her name in print told Weekly Trust that Sadiya, the oldest daughter of the family had gone to a nearby internet café to do her assignment for school.
 “Sadiya went to a café to do her school assignment; I want to believe that maybe when she came back and there was not light, she lit a candle to transfer the homework into her book which caused the fire. But I am only suspecting, I am not sure.
 “I was so devastated when I saw what their house had become; I even saw when Sadiya’s body was taken outside before their bodies were taken to the St. Gerald’s hospital. She was in SS1,” she stated.
 The Public Relations Officer (PRO) of the St. Gerald’s Hospital Kaduna Sunday John Ali confirmed that the hospital received corpses from the fire incident.
 “Yes, the corpses of the children from the Kakuri fire incident were brought here and the only survivor is lying in a critical condition in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the hospital, he has 80-85 degree burns but he is responding to treatment,” he said.
 He noted that a large crowd of members of the community came around 12pm on Friday to collect the bodies so that they can be buried according to Islamic rights.
Now the dilemma of Maryam’s relations and neighbours is how to break the bad news to her without putting her through agony.
WeeklyTrust

Brazil Nightclub Tragedy: Lessons For Nigeria


On Sunday, January 27, a fire swept through the packed, popular Kiss Nightclub in Santa Maria, Southern Brazil, killing over 230 people - enough to fill a large airliner. Brazilian authorities have said that of the 143 people still hospitalised, more than 70 are in a critical condition.

READ MORE: Brazil Declares 3 Days of Mourning Over Nightclub Tragedy
The Kiss Nightclub is popular with young people in Santa Maria, which is home to a number of universities and colleges, including the Federal University of Santa Maria. At least 80 of those killed were students from that University, Brazilian authorities disclosed.
Brazilian Police investigating the blaze have said that it likely started when a country music band performing at the Kiss Nightclub lit a flare which ignited flammable soundproofing foam on the ceiling. That initial error was compounded by the over-capacity crowd, near-total lack of emergency infrastructure such as fire alarms or sprinkler systems, the police further revealed and noted that the club also had only one working door and a faulty fire extinguisher.
Amid the shock of what has become the world’s deadliest nightclub fire in a decade, stricter safety measures in Brazil seem on the horizon. In Brasilia, the nation’s capital, lawmakers in the Lower House are working on a proposal that would require federal safety minimum standards across Brazil. States are expected to domesticate such laws when they come on stream. Significantly, the tragedy raises questions about the reliability of safety regulations in a nation set to host the World Cup and Olympic Games.
We believe that the Brazilian nightclub fire tragedy contains several important lessons for Nigeria and our laid-back approach to regulation of critical institutions and public spaces. In Nigeria currently, the Federal Capital Territory Abuja, Lagos, Port Harcourt, Asaba, Enugu and a few other towns represent active centres of night life. The tragic Brazil fire quickly puts these centres of vibrant night life on the spot.
Documents obtained by The Associated Press in the aftermath of the blaze, examining fire safety plan permits issued to the club, showed that the single exit, the foam insulation and other contributors to the tragedy didn’t violate existing laws in that city. This is strange. Our town/city councils, local regulators and parliament must update subsisting laws to decisively preempt such a tragedy in Nigeria.
Because of the apparent cheapness of life in the country, we can state that many of the nightclubs that currently operate in Nigeria may not have the minimum safety infrastructure to guarantee quick evacuation in case of fire and other emergencies.


It must not take a Brazil-type tragedy to wake us up to that possibility.
Many nightclubs currently operating are actually not designed for the purpose. Many are converted residential structures dressed up as grade-A night clubs as the regulators look the other way. Many of the entertainment centres may potentially be death traps. Town planning authorities, the national and state parliaments, law enforcement agencies, Non-governmental Organisations and other concerned groups must close ranks and insist that the rational course be followed.
In Abuja, many existing nightclubs were not originally built for the purpose. Yet their high-decibel nightly shindigs go on night after night.
While we are not against the existence of nightclubs or night-clubbing, we insist that such public spaces must be made safe for the public. While existing regulations should be updated, the police should ensure that all nightclubs, bars and other entertainment venues comply. Single exits do not serve public safety interest best. Overcrowding, appropriate fire control and all irregularities in night-club construction must be addressed.
Naij

Marines Survey: About 17 Percent Of Male Soldiers Would Leave If Women Move To Combat Roles


By JULIE WATSON, The ASSOCIATED PRESS
SAN DIEGO -- A Marine Corps survey found about 17 percent of male Marine respondents said they would likely leave the Corps if women move into combat positions.
That number jumped to 22 percent if women are assigned involuntarily to those jobs, according to the survey.
Male Marines also listed among their top concerns fears about being falsely accused of sexual harassment or assault, fraternization or some Marines getting preferential treatment. They also worried women would be limited because of pregnancy or personal issues that could affect the unit before they are sent to the battlefield.
Results of the survey of 53,000 Marines were released to The Associated Press on Friday.
The survey was conducted last summer and the results were given to Defense Secretary Leon Panetta before he opened thousands of combat jobs to female service members last week.
Both sexes surveyed mentioned intimate relationships between Marines and feeling obligated to protect female Marines among their top five concerns about allowing women into ground combat jobs.
Women Marines listed among their top three concerns enemies targeting women as POWs, the risk of sexual harassment or assault and hygiene requirements, according to the results which did not given specifics.
The survey asked female Marines if they would feel pressured to suppress their femininity, something equal rights activists found offensive.
About 4 percent of female Marines surveyed said they would consider leaving if the ban was lifted. Even more would drop out if women were put into those positions involuntarily with about 17 percent of female respondents expressing they would cut their careers short under those circumstances.
About 31 percent of female respondents say they would be interested in moving into a combat position.
The commandant of the Marine Corps said the infantry side of the most male of all military branches is skeptical about how women will perform in their units, and some positions may end up closed again if too few females meet the physically demanding standards of combat.
Gen. James Amos made the remarks to reporters Thursday at a defense conference in San Diego hosted by the U.S. Naval Institute and the defense trade group AFCEA.
Amos says most Marines support the policy change. He pointed out that over the past decade, many male service members already have been fighting alongside women in Iraq and Afghanistan. Women who serve in supply troops, as clerks and with military police have ended up on the unmarked front lines of modern warfare, blurring the distinction between combat and noncombat jobs. More than 150 women have been killed in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan while serving in support roles.
Many of the newly opened positions are in Army and Marine infantry units and in potentially elite commando jobs. It will be up to the military service chiefs to recommend and defend whether women should be excluded from any of those more demanding and deadly positions, such as Navy commandos or the Army's Delta Force.
The infantry units are smaller and spend more grueling time in battle.
"I think from the infantry side of the house, you know they're more skeptical," Amos said. "It's been an all-male organization throughout the history of the U.S. Marine Corps so I don't think that should be any surprise."
The Marine Corps is the most male of all the military branches. About 7 percent of Marines are female compared to about 14 percent overall for the armed forces.
HuffingtonPost