Monday, 4 February 2013

$67b row turns dirty

$67b row turns dirty
by: Augustine Ehikioya  More missiles were hurled at the weekend by the associates of former-President Olusegun Obasanjo and President Goodluck Jonathan’s aides, who have been bickering over the running of the government.
A former Education Minister and one-time Vice President (Africa) at the World Bank, Dr. Oby Ezekwesili, ignited the fire.
She alleged at the convocation lecture she delivered at the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN) that the administration of the late Umaru Musa Yar’Adua and Dr. Jonathan frittered away $67 billion in foreign reserves and Excess Crude Account (ECA) left behind by Obasanjo.
Former ministers Nasir el-Rufai and Femi Fani-Kayode joined the fray in defence of Mrs. Ezekwesili, who came under attack from Information Minister Labaran Maku and presidential aide Dr. Doyin Okupe.
Maku asked Mrs. Ezekwesili to account for the over N40 billion voted for education when she was in charge between 2006 and 2007.
Obasanjo has been unrelenting in his criticism of the Jonathan administration, especially its handling of the Boko Haram crisis.
Presidential spokesman Reuben Abati, in an article entitled “Hypocrisy of yesterday’s men”, published in major newspapers yesterday, took on Mrs. Ezekwesili and other ministers in the Obasanjo cabinet. He also attacked Obasanjo for failing to deliver in the power sector.
“They managed to leave the country in darkness, with less than 2,000 MW; abandoned Independent Power Projects, mismanaged power stations… a better conceived power sector road map is running apace, and the administration is determined to make it better,” Abati wrote.
But yesterday, Mrs. Ezekwesili and el-Rufai took to the twitter to fire back at the presidential spokesman.
Fani-Kayode, in a statement, also attacked Abati and defended himself against the allegation of failure as the Aviation minister, who shut down the Port Harcourt Airport which the Jonathan government has now refurbished.
Mrs. Ezekwesili twitted yesterday: “Those of you that are hungry to smear me better find other jobs to do.
“This woman has never hungered for ignoble wealth.”
In another twit, she wrote: “Comprehension is the act or action of grasping with the intellect. Again, where is the accountability for the use of our resources?”
She twitted: “Lying that my husband – a pastor of Redeemed – owns a church is like saying Father (Matthew) Kukah owns his Catholic (church) parish”
el-Rufai twitted: “The fools of today don’t recall that social media and broadband became prevalent in Nigeria after 2007 due to efforts of the men of yesterday.”
Former House of Representatives member Dino Melaye, who has taken up opposition role against the government through his non-governmental organisation, also twitted yesterday.
“Writing articles about me, el-Rufai and others without our names is an act of cowardice, fear and respect.”
But a twist to the quarrel came with Obasanjo’s surprise appearance at the Presidential Villa yesterday.
The former-President, who has been a thorn in the flesh of the government, worshipped together with President Jonathan at the Aso Rock Chapel.
Abati twitted yesterday: “Former President Olusegun Obasanjo and President Goodluk Jonathan worshipped together today at the Aso Rock Villa Chapel; and had lunch.”
Obasanjo was accompanied to the Villa by two of his children and a businessman, Mr. Femi Otedola.
The service was also attended by President Jonathan’s wife, Patience, his mother, Madam Eunice and other dignitaries.
Obasanjo, according to sources, gave a very short notice before turning up for the service. He read the second lesson and led a prayer session.
The former President was also said to have visited the Children’s Church with President Jonathan at the end of the service. He prayed for the children.
Obasanjo thereafter followed President Jonathan to his official residence where they had lunch.
Details of their discussion were not known.
TheNation

Dangote, others set up Jonathan, OBJ talk –Investigation

 by Niyi Odebode, Fidelis Soriwei and Olusola Fabiyi 
Obasanjo and Jonathan
DETAILS emerged on Monday how ex-president Olusegun Obasanjo’s loyalists facilitated his fence-mending visit to the Aso Rock Villa on Sunday.
At the core of the arrangement that led to the visit and closed-door talk between Obasanjo and President Goodluck Jonathan were business mogul, Aliko Dangote; oil marketer, Femi Otedola; court-sacked National Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party, Olagunsoye Oyinlola; and a former Chief Executive Officer of the United Bank of Africa, Mr. Tony Elumelu, among others.
Dangote, Oyinlola, Otedola and Elumelu are all said to be the loyalists of the ex-President.
These Obasanjo’s men who are also said to have the ears of Jonathan were said to have impressed it upon the former President that the lingering feud between him and the current occupier of Aso Rock was inimical to the interest of the ruling PDP, especially with the justling for the 2015 poll already picking up.
Dangote and others were however, said to have received the blessing of Jonathan before they approached Obasanjo for a possible settlement.
In spite of denials by the Presidency, both Jonathan and Obasanjo had been at loggerheads for some time with each side taking a sharp jab at the other.
Barely 24 hours before Obasanjo’s sudden visit to the villa in Abuja, the Presidency had railed at the ex-President, whom Jonathan’s aides said was “confused” in his assessment of the Boko Haram issue.
“If Obasanjo said what he said, we will just tolerate him because the other time, he said force should be used and he turned back to say dialogue must be used. Now, he is saying another thing. He is becoming confusing. I think the old man is becoming confused. The fact is that the insecurity issue started even during Obasanjo’s regime. It did not start with Jonathan’s regime,” Special Adviser to the President on Political Matters, Ahmed Gulak, had said in an interview with The PUNCH on Saturday.
Alarmed at the statement from the Presidency and knowing what would be Obasanjo’s response, Dangote, Otedola, Elumelu and co were said to have rushed down to Abeokuta to meet the ex-President at his Presidential mansion and begged him to give peace a chance.
Indeed, Obasanjo, according to a source, had planned a “befitting” acerbic line to drop on his way out of the country on Sunday but for the quick intervention by the “men of peace”.
The peacemakers were also said to have been propelled by Jonathan’s known aversion to pick quarrels with Obasanjo who was said to have facilitated the President’s rise to power, though a fresh revelation by another Obasanjo loyalist and former Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Mallam Nasir el-Rufai, in his yet-to-be-released book is said to have indicated that the ex-President really wanted to ditch Jonathan because of his “weak character”.
It is said to have been the prevailing view among those managing the President that his major concern should be the provision of effective leadership for the party under his leadership as President and not to be seen to be fighting.
But there are said to be some in Obasanjo’s camp who did not want the rift between their principal and Jonathan to come to an end.
Recounting the circumstances that led to Obasanjo’s Sunday’s fence-mending visit to Aso Rock, a source in the know said, “You see, the Obasanjo camp is divided between its loyalists who wanted a fight and those who wanted settlement.
“You can see that while people like Oby Ezekwesili wanted a fight, people like Femi Fani-Kayode were not in support of such a fight, although they would defend Obasanjo in all situations no matter what.
“However, some of Obasanjo’s allies like Oyinlola, Dangote, Otedola and Elumelu initiated the move to bring the two men together. With what has happened, it is clear that those who didn’t want a fight are the ones winning. But don’t lose sight of the fact that the other camp would not go to sleep.
“The challenge, however, is that the President’s men and those on the side of peace from the Obasanjo camp have to work hard to nurture it.
“The President is the leader of the party. It is his responsibility to lead the party. He cannot be fighting his people; he has to lead them.”
Meanwhile, Jonathan has reportedly ordered his aides to cease fire on the dispute between him and Obasanjo in tandem with the truce agreed upon by the duo on Sunday.
Obasanjo was accompanied to the Villa by two of his daughters; a son, identified as Juwon; and Otedola.
A top chieftain of the PDP, who pleaded anonymity, said, “You will observe that Jonathan has not engaged in any direct verbal war with Obasanjo. He has been looking for ways to restore the peaceful relationship between them.”
Punch

2015: Merger plan ’ll make PDP smallest party – Hanga


2015: Merger plan ’ll make PDP smallest party – Hanga
Senator Rufai Hanga represented Kano Central Senatorial District in the National Assembly from 2003 to 2007 on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). He later decamped to the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) where he emerged the first national chairman of the party. He speaks with CHINELO OBOGO on the planned merger of the opposition parties and other national issues.

I may still make it to the Senate
It is not the end of me yet; so, anything can happen. I may still go back to the Senate. After all, I am still in politics. I will never be tired of contributing my quota to issues of national development. Tomorrow is still pregnant and we cannot tell what it will bring. But for now, I am the National Chairman of the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC).
Between Tony Momoh and I
I am currently in court, challenging the legality of their purported convention, which they claimed they held. I am asking the court to decide the legitimacy of the status of the leadership of the CPC.
I recall that INEC wrote to say they should not have held the convention because they did not conduct the congresses of the party. You and I know that congresses produce the delegates to the convention. The rule says you must hold congresses in not less than 20 states of the federation. But this was not the case. So, where did they get the delegates to the convention?
We told them that as far as they did not hold the congresses to produce delegates to the convention, there was no way that the outcome of the convention would be deemed to be legal.
I was the national chairman and I am still the National Chairman of the CPC. They only appointed a caretaker chairman to act on my behalf briefly when I was away then. I came back to find someone on my chair as the national chairman.
I really do not want to cause any havoc for the party. But if I am not wanted as the national chairman, I will be ready to go, but not until a congress is held to elect delegates for a convention. They have refused to hold a congress. What they did was to go out on the streets and recruit people as party delegates. That is what I am challenging in court.
Following what they said was a convention, INEC wrote them that they had not held congresses in 20 states and, therefore, they could not possibly claim to have held a convention.
The Tony Momoh-led exco is not proper because there were no congresses to produce the delegates to elect them. They picked the delegates from the streets to the convention. That is why I am telling you that we remain the authentic leaders of the party. As we speak, my vice national chairman is still in office as well as the national secretary. All other principal officers of the party are in office. So, what does that tell you about who the party recognises?
We are in court, challenging them and as law-abiding citizens, we cannot afford to go on the street and protest or cause any havoc.  As a person, I am not going to impose myself on the party but what I want to see done is to ensure that the proper thing is done. I am not desperate for office.
How to achieve merger with  other parties
I am strongly in support of our proposed merger with other parties and I want to see it materialise because we want a change in the country.
Between other parties in the merger talks and both factions of CPC
I have tried to tell the ACN, the ANPP and, in fact, APGA, that they may be discussing with the wrong people because it is my sincere desire to see the merger process materialise. But what we want and request to see is the merger exercise to be consistent with the Electoral Act and within the existing legal parameters. So, if the other parties are sincere, they should see that the right thing is done, after all, there are legal procedures to a merger and we can only wait and see if they will comply with them.
I am optimistic about the merger plans
I will tell you what happened in 2011, because I was directly involved as the National Chairman in the alliance discussion with the ACN and others. We (the members of the executive) agreed in principle that we were coming together and we almost sealed it but along the line, some people, who surrounded General Muhammadu Buhari, manipulated him and told him that we were not the ones to be discussing with the ACN leaders and others. They said they would conclude the discussion and bring it to us for our approval.
I really could not understand what they meant. We had already agreed in principle that Buhari would stand as the presidential candidate while Asiwaju Bola Tinubu’s group would produce the running mate. They later went behind to say that Buhari would contest and there was nothing to discuss further and if any group wanted to join, they should say so. They became so arrogant as if they had already won the election.
At the end, they went outside what was discussed to appoint someone outside the ACN as Buhari’s running mate. That was how the process collapsed and CPC was not any better for it. Again, these same people are still going round Buhari, trying to manipulate him.
That is why true leaders of the party want to get involved in the merger discussion and make it a reality. Those angling to be part of the discussion are not sincere. So, if we allow them to continue in their deceit, the merger talks will not work because they do not mean well for the arrangement. We have the instrument to the merger and we want to merge and we are determined to see the merger succeed.
So, I am highly optimistic because all the parties to the merger are ready to surrender their certificates to INEC and fuse into one party. The ANPP is willing to surrender its certificate, same as the ACN, the CPC as well as the APGA.
It is just a matter of time and we will all surrender our certificates and come out on one platform and as a new party. The last time the alliance did not work because we were in the eve of an election and also because some people were selfish. But it is not going to be like that again as we are going to collapse into one big party.
Nothing is going to stop me from surrendering the certificate of CPC to INEC in a bid to forge a successful merger. As I speak, the certificate is deposited in a bank and I have written a Will stating that if I die, my children should collect it and hand it over to INEC for the purpose of a merger.
In Nigeria today, we know that the strongest opposition party is the ACN, which is why I told my son that if I die any moment, he should give the certificate to Asiwaju Bola Tinubu to surrender to INEC for the purpose of forming a merger. The merger is already a reality and nobody can stop it now, not even the PDP.
What surrendering certificates of registration by the merging parties mean
We are going to have a single candidate as soon as we fuse into one party. And what that means is that all the supporters of the three or four political parties will yield their votes and support to a single candidate to emerge from the merger exercise. There will be a strong synergy as all the different candidates that hitherto contested on their individual platform will pool their followers for a single and strong candidate.
The whole North will never vote for the PDP this time around. When the entire South-west, South-east vote for a single candidate, you can only imagine the kind of landslide that will be witnessed. Come 2015, the PDP will become the smallest minority party in Nigeria, you just wait and see. From their claim of being the biggest party in Africa, they will become the smallest party in Nigeria.
With most of the parties being deregistered, PDP will crash from being the biggest to the smallest party in Nigeria.
Why the North is opposed to state creation
On state creation, the argument has been that you just do not create state for the sake of it or on the basis of regions or zones simply because you want to satisfy some people.
There must be standards for creating these states such as population and land mass. Let me give you an instance, while you can traverse the entire South-east and South South in just one day, you cannot traverse one state in the North-west in one day.
Secondly, a state like Akwa Ibom has 31 council areas, yet the entire population of the state is not more than two million people. And if you put the population of the entire South-south zone together, it is not up to that of Kano State. Again, the entire land mass is not up to Kano State. That is just the simple argument and so, you cannot go about creating states on the basis of regions, ethnicity or zones.
You will also agree with me that it is grossly unfair to have one Senator representing just two local governments, while one Senator will represent about 16 local governments in the North. The same also holds for one Senator representing one million people while elsewhere, five million people have one Senator representing them.
TheSun

Alleged ethnic cleansing: COAS postpones explanation till Monday

 by  Chris Agbambu- Abuj
Major-General Bolaji Koleosho (left), handing over to the new Director, Army Public Relations, Brigadier-General Ibrahim Attahiru, at the Army Headquarters on Monday. PHOTO/SUNDAY OSUNRAYI  THE Chief of the Army Staff, Lieutenant-General Azubuike Ihejirika, will, next week, address the issue of lopsided promotions and retirements in the Army, as being sponsored by some disgruntled elements.

The army chief, who has registered his disappointment with the alleged ethnic cleansing and victimisation in the Army had promised to address the issue next week, on the occasion of the first quarter of the Chief of Army Staff Conference.

A section of the media raised the alarm, accusing the Army Chief of giving his kinsmen juicy appointments and violating the Army Council‘s directives since his emergence as the Chief of Army Staff, although the army authorities had faulted the allegation and on Monday, disclosed that Ihejirika would address the issue next Monday.

The new Director, Army Public Relations Department, Brigadier-General Ibrahim Attahiru, made the disclosure while taking over from Major-General Bolaji Koleosho, who himself later resumed work as the Chief of the Civil-Military Affairs.

Attahiru, who acknowledged  media reports, said “my answer for now is that the Chief of the Army Staff would address members of the press on February 11 and this issue would properly be addressed.”

At the handing-over ceremony, Major-General Koleosho acknowledged the support, understanding that characterised the relationship between the media and the army while his tenure lasted and urged the media professionals to extend the same gesture to his successor.

The new army spokesman appealed to the media to crosscheck their facts from his office on any story that had to do with the army before going to the press and  promised to operate an open door policy.

Until the new appointment,  Attahiru was the Assistant Director at the Plans Department at the Defence Headquarters.
NigerianTribune

FG uncovers secrets of new islamic sect •Why it broke away from Boko Haram •Govt weighs options on Boko Haram peace deal

 by  Taiwo Adisa- Abuja
From left, deputy governor of Kaduna State, Alhaji Nuhu Bajoga; Vice-President Namadi Sambo; president Goodluck Jonathan and governor Mukhtar Yero during a visit to the president in Abuja, on Monday.FOLLOWING the resolve of a section of the radical Islamic sect, Boko Haram, to embrace dialogue with the Federal Government, it has emerged that the administration has mandated security agencies to unravel the new sect, known as Jamatul Ansaril Muslima fi Biladis Sudan (JAMBS) which translates to Vanguard for the Aid of Muslims in Black Africa.

The sect had claimed responsibility for the attack on some Mali-bound Nigerian soldiers, in Kogi State earlier in the year.

Sources told the Nigerians Tribune that the government was being careful not to enter into a blind negotiation with Boko Haram leaders, while the JAMBS elements would remain potent.

Administration sources also declared that initial investigations had confirmed that JAMBS is a breakaway sect of Boko Haram and that most of its commanders were erstwhile commanders of Boko Haram, who were said to have got disenchanted with the leadership style of Boko Haram leader, Mallam Abubakar Shekau.

An administration source said that government had discovered that “JAMBS is affiliated to Alqaeda in Islamic Maghreb (AQIM and that it was formed by former commanders of Boko Haram who disagreed with the leadership style of Abubakar Shekau.”

Sources further stated that JAMBS is led by Mallam Abu Usamatul Aansari, who is known as the Supreme Leader or (Amir JAMBS).

According to information in official circles, the movement recruits youths between ages 16 and 22.

The targeted youths, according to information, are therefore sent for training in armed and unarmed combats as well as terrorist support trainings.

“JAMBS capitalised on this to source for funding and training needed for commencement of terrorism acts in the country,” an official communication read.

Information pieced together also indicated that the JAMBS leadership fell out with Mallam Shekau due to a number of allegations they levelled against him.

It was further confirmed that government had decided to watch the peace offer by Boko Haram carefully, so as not to create further problems for the peace process.

“The Federal Government is committed to ensuring peace and harmonious relationship among Nigerians but it should not be seen to be rushing to embrace peace deals in a way that would not last. We will check out the history of the splinter groups to ensure no stone is left unturned,” a source said on Monday.
NigerianTribune

Elites and the Nigerian Project


0101 SK-backpagex.jpg - 0101 SK-backpagex.jpg
Simon Kolawole Live!: Emailsimon.kolawole@thisdaylive.com

This story fascinates but saddens me. Reacting to one of my articles, a young, wealthy Nigerian said: “To be honest, I am making a lot of money in Nigeria. I have friends in government. I get juicy contracts and make handsome margins. I have houses in Lekki, London and New York. My house in Lekki has a high fence, security gates, security doors, security wires and security guards on duty 24/7. My house in London has no fence, no security doors, no guards. Yet I feel more secure in my London home than in my Lekki house.” He said the inequalities in Nigeria are such that “the wealthy live like prisoners… the rest of the society resents them”.
And that brings me to the topic of discussion today – the grave mistake our elites make when they think it is fun owning mansions and private jets, at our expense, in the face of the demeaning poverty in the land. This myopic mindset propels them to continually milk the system and feed their greed. By elites, I refer to the politicians, the technocrats and the business moguls who collude to plunder our resources. They know themselves. We know them. They know that we know them. By the way, I am not saying it is wrong to own yachts and jets and mansions. I am not saying it is a sin to be rich. I am not suggesting that to be poor is to be righteous. The key phrase here is accumulating wealth “at our expense”.
Last week, I highlighted the twin evil of “outright looting” (no attempt to execute projects at all) and “hyperinflation of contracts” (including padding of budgets by lawmakers). Resources that would otherwise have been freed up and utilised to accelerate infrastructural development are mindlessly pilfered. Definitely, there is a reason the streets of London, Dubai and Singapore are relatively safe today. There is a reason you feel secure there without a fence around your house. Long ago, their elites understood the Yoruba proverb: “Irorun igi ni irorun eye” (“The bird needs a comfortable tree to perch at ease”). You cannot be at ease when the society where you’re flaunting your wealth is not at ease.
The elites in developed countries have long understood that true wealth, true prosperity is that which reflects not just in their private accounts but in the larger society. That is why in the UK, for instance, agriculture is subsidised to make food cheap and affordable. No matter how poor you are, you should be able to feed. There is an understanding that you should not be homeless. So councils build flats and make them cheap or free for the poor. They understand the need for affordable and efficient transport system. You don’t have to own a car. They understand that a society ravaged by poverty and crippling inequalities is a doomed society. The rich can never live at ease in such a society.
In Nigeria, our political elites and their money launderers in the private sector do not appreciate this basic fact. The money for fuel subsidy gets stolen. The fertilizer subsidy meant to make food affordable is stolen. Housing schemes are never for those who truly need them. Budgets for education and health are looted, and you find private hospitals and private schools springing up everywhere, charging fees that can be afforded only by the wealthy, most of whom probably participated in the looting in the first place. Budgets for roads are stolen and the potholes keep swallowing innocent lives. The next thing you see is private jets everywhere, at the expense of the common wealth.
No wonder you sleep at ease in your London home, where there is no fence, than in your fortified Nigerian house where soldiers and police are on guard. It is quite easy to understand why: our elites have created and are sustaining a society filled with outrageous inequalities. Millions of people are jobless and poor and resentful of the rich. They read the stories of sleaze in the newspapers every day. They read how someone steals billions of naira from police pensions and is fined N750, 000 only! They are bitter and angry. They are desperate. They resort to violent robberies, kidnappings and other crimes. That, in a nutshell, should explain why the elites still feel insecure in their maximum-prison mansions.
A wealthy Nigerian told me years ago: “I have a feeling that one day, I may have to take a chopper from my house (in Victoria Island) to get to Murtala Muhammed airport for the fear of being attacked. The anger I see on the faces of the people scares me. There is an air of hostility.” Good talk - but this sort of reality should propel the elites to think deeper and change their ways. They need to come to a consensus that things cannot continue like this. If not, they or their children will be kings in a society where they are too scared to peep out of the window of their mansions.
Here is my suggestion: the plundering has to be drastically reduced and the resources freed to redress the colossal imbalance in the society. Trust me, it is in the interest of the elites – both political and business. As the budgets get spent on what they are meant for, as the right investments are made to generate jobs, it is just a matter of time for unemployment, poverty and crime to reduce. It is not rocket science. The right investments in education, healthcare, roads, power, transportation and industry can only lead to one outcome: a productive and prosperous country, an empowered citizenry. Everybody benefits that way! But this will never happen as long as this conspiracy to plunder goes unchecked.
I hear people argue that South Korea (and many other Asian countries) developed in spite of corruption. There is frequent reference to Daewoo, Hyundai, Samsung and LG being products of corruption that have now gone on to dominate the world. I think there is some confusion here. The corruption that bred the Korean Chaebol is cronyism or favouritism, not looting. Korea’s budgets for subsidies and infrastructure were not looted! If that was the case, South Korea would not have good roads, good schools and good hospitals today. Let us get that clearly before we propagate fake theories here. It will take centuries for a society that is run like ours, where the elites grab and grub every naira in sight, to smell development. No wonder we are still virtually stuck in underdevelopment – in spite of all the petrodollars.

And Four Other Things...


JOKE OF THE YEAR
Those who know me very well can testify that I like jokes a lot – I give and receive in equal measure. But in my joking career, I have never come across a more rib-cracking one like the N750,000 fine handed over to John Yakubu Yesufu for stealing N23.3 billion or so from police pensions. That was fun, right? I am at all loss as to why the EFCC would try Yesufu under a lighter law, thereby putting Justice Abdulsalam Talba in a tight corner. Was that a plea-bargain arrangement to prevent lengthy prosecution? We need answers.
AUTHORITY STEALING
Meanwhile, a Magistrate Court in Ikare, Ondo State, has sentenced 23-year-old Adepoju Jamiu to three years in prison for stealing a mobile phone valued at N17,000 only. Chief Magistrate Sunday Adeniyan did not give him an option of fine. Angry Nigerians were quick to compare the crimes and the punishments, but is that not the real Nigeria? Our prisons are overflowing with petty thieves. There is no single former commissioner, former governor, former minister, former lawmaker or former president in jail for corruption in Nigeria. That sums up the kind of society we are living in, where the elites always get away with murder.
EL-RUFAI AND JESUS
Malam Nasir el-Rufai walked into another controversy recently when he re-tweeted a blasphemous post on Jesus Christ (I will not repeat it here). A lot of political capital is being made out of this, but I am very glad Christians’ response has been rational and measured. I shiver to think what would have happened in Northern Nigeria if the tweet or re-tweet was about Islam. For me, there is a lot of lesson to be learnt about restrain when it comes to religious provocations. This message goes specifically to those who make political capital out of religion.
CAN EAGLES FLY?
The Super Eagles face the Elephants of Cote d’Ivoire today in the quarter-finals of the African Cup of Nations. I’ll be honest and admit that I am not expecting much from them. I have been appalled by their performance so far. But we cannot afford to give up. Football remains our opium in Nigeria in face of bad news coming from every corner. At least, we forget our troubles for the time being. I therefore wish the Super Eagles well today. I will not shed a tear, though, if we are eliminated.
ThisDay

INCREDIBLE! NFF booked Eagles return tickets before q/final match

 
Long before the first ball was kicked in the 2013 Africa Cup of Nations quarter final match between the Super Eagles of Nigeria and the Elephants of Ivory Coast, many had written off the Eagles and given the tie to the Ivorians.
At the sports ministry and even the Nigeria Football Federation, there were lots of undercurrents that pointed to drastic measures that may have culminated in the sack of the Super Eagles technical crew, headed by Coach Stephen Keshi.
Nigeria's Team Photo Front Row: L-R: Midfielder Victor Moses, Forward Sunday Mba, Goalkeeper Vincent Enyeama,  Forward Ikechukwu Uche,  Defender Godfrey Oboabona. Back row L-R: Midfielder John Obi Mikel, Defender Kenneth Omeruo,Defender Efe Ambrose,  Forward Emmanuel Emenike, Defender Elderson Echiejile, Forward Emmanuel Emenike,   during a 2013 African Cup of Nations Group C match in Rustenburg on January 29, 2013 at Royal Bafokeng Stadium. AFP PHOTO
Nigeria’s Team Photo Front Row: L-R: Midfielder Victor Moses, Forward Sunday Mba, Goalkeeper Vincent Enyeama, Forward Ikechukwu Uche, Defender Godfrey Oboabona. Back row L-R: Midfielder John Obi Mikel, Defender Kenneth Omeruo,Defender Efe Ambrose, Forward Emmanuel Emenike, Defender Elderson Echiejile, Forward Emmanuel Emenike, during a 2013 African Cup of Nations Group C match in Rustenburg on January 29, 2013 at Royal Bafokeng Stadium. AFP PHOTO
The degree of doubt in the team and the technical crew by officials reached a crescendo soon after the team’s final group match against Ethiopia in Nelspruit, when it was openly suggested that a foreign coach would be sought to replace Keshi, once the team made its expected early exit from the tournament.
Although the spokesman for the NFF, Chief Emeka Inyamah made a public denial over the search for a foreign coach, he did not dismiss its possibility. Addressing the press after the Ethiopia match, Inyamah said, “that to me is a distraction.
Rather, we will come together at the end of the tournament to review everything. If he is worthy to continue, he will continue and if we think that there is need to bring in a white or black man to assist, then we bring one.”
But events that transpired after that press conference pointed to the fact that the NFF did not believe the Coach Stephen Keshi team could beat Ivory Coast.
NFF officials would not have been taken by surprise if the Super Eagles had crashed against the Elephants on Sunday.
Sports Vanguard gathered in Abuja that the football house had already booked for the team’s return flight to Nigeria soon after the match.
A source told Sports Vanguard that all the money relating to the flight arrangements had been concluded.
Vanguard