Thursday, 14 February 2013

Nigerian Security Operatives Abduct Kaduna Journalist


Musa Awwal
By SaharaReporters, New York
A source close to Sheik Ibraheem Zazzaky, the leader of Islamic Movement of Nigeria has sent a distress call to SaharaReporters stating that security operatives  earlier today abducted Musa Muhammad Awwal, editor of the Shiite-based Hausa vernacular newspaper, Almizan around 4am this morning in Kaduna.
Awwal was arrested in his Rigasa, Kaduna home and taken to an unknown destination by a group of armed operatives of the Nigerian secret police.
It would be recalled that Awwal and his reporter Aliyu Saleh were arrested and detained starting from December 24 2012 for one week.

'Blade Runner' Oscar Pistorious Kills Girlfriend In South Africa


Oscar Pistorius and
By SR Sports
Renowned blade runner Oscar Pistorius has reportedly shot and killed his girlfriend apparently mistaking her for a burglar.
Police sources in South Africa states that the incident happened at his Silver Lakes home at around 4am on Thursday morning.
A police Captain Sarah Mcira confirmed that Pistorius’s girlfriend,  Reeva Steenkamp, was shot in the head and arm and died on the scene.
Pistorius has been taken into police custody and 9mm gun recovered from him. The paralympic star is expected to appear in the Pretoria Magistrate's Court later on Thursday.

Catalysts of Change



Abdul Mahmud.

Our politicians present an interesting spectacle one hardly finds elsewhere. The way they work the dynamics of power to their advantage, reduce other competing players caught up in the middle of the dynamics into mere spectators, proves that politics is a spectacle, a blood sport, driven by the desire to acquiring political power for self-serving ends.

That our politicians, as poor students of Harold Lasswell, define and shape politics in a manner different from the way the late cerebral scholar conceived it in his brilliant seminal, ‘Politics: who gets what, when and how ‘, offers little comfort to the ordinary people of our country who bear the predetermined and intended effects of power grab.

Last week, two epochal developments- the public presentation of my brother and friend, Nasir El-Rufai’s memoir, ‘The Accidental Public Servant’ and the birth of All Progressives Congress (APC)-harped on our public space and centred the subject of power and change in our public discourse. Both developments, much as they map out new perspectives to our understanding of power politics and shape the boundaries of party political engagements, are about public accountability, as is El-Rufai’s memoir, about questioning dominant understandings of what goes on in the corridors of power and changing our country for the better.

It must however be stated that the critical Nigerian public welcomed both epochal developments with applauds and knocks. Abubakar Atiku, in particular, described El-Rufai’s memoir as ‘’pass off fiction for self-gratification at the expense of truth… a collection of fiction, half-truths, exaggeration and reflection of selective memory’’.

But, before El-Rufai is slayed by some of his ardent critics, it is important to examine memoirs generally and what makes them what they are; and also examine El-Rufai’s contributions to public discourse. Quickly, let me make a point or two on Abubakar Atiku’s response which indicates a partial, if not substantial, admission of El-Rufai’s metanarratives. ‘’A collection of fiction, half-truths, exaggeration and reflection of selective memory’’ points to the fact that somewhere between fiction and exaggeration lies the other half of truth that El-Rufai selectively shied away from.

Here, Abubakar Atiku misses the essential nature of all memoirs. Through the ages memoirs have remained the selective rendering of the stories of lives, the past and events that make vivid and compelling reading. My emphasis, here, is on ‘selective’; the adjective that discerns prudent and careful presentation and representation of events of the past that fit into the memoirist’s own life. And, here, too, is the rediscovery of those striking moments of the memoirist’s life, meanings that overlay those moments. Simply put, memoirs are the memoirist’s account of their public exploits. Abubakar Atiku would serve truth and the Nigerian public better by rendering his own account of the events he alleges El-Rufai fictionalised in his memoir, even if to make up the whole that is greater, or truer, than the sum of El-Rufai’s parts.

From my reading (I must confess it is a slow read so far) of ‘The Accidental Public Servant’, I discern three significant contributions of El-Rufai. Firstly, he highlights the fact that governments must be open to public enquiries. The opening up of governance and public policy environments entails the transmission of transparent information to the public, public engagement (the kind that allows the public to have free and unfettered engagement with governance and policy processes and personages, in order to influence public policies and service delivery programmes) and, more importantly, accountability.

What El-Rufai has done is rip the lids off the whitewashed sepulchres of governments for us to glimpse rotted skeletons. El-Rufai holds himself out as the quintessential ‘medical examiner’ who exhumes reputations to cast and examine them in new lights. Secondly, El-Rufai extends the frontiers of our national discourse by placing in the public space his interpretation and reinterpretation of events with the sense of courage one finds among public intellectuals and in a manner that accentuates the truth Edward Said expressed in his now famous Reith Lectures, ‘Representation of Intellectuals’: ‘’the ultimate function of the public intellectual is to speak truth to power. Speaking truth to power is no Panglossian idealism.

It is carefully weighing the alternatives, picking the right one, and then intelligently representing it where it can do the most good and cause the right change’’. For Said as for El-Rufai, ‘’the public intellectual’s role is to present alternative narratives and other perspectives on history’’. Thirdly, El-Rufai invites us to understand our country better, think critically about our leaders (including him) and judge them for their actions and inactions.

Away from El-Rufai, I welcome the birth of the new party, the All Progressives Congress (APC). The All Progressives Congress provides a veritable political platform to challenge the ruling party, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). And beyond the challenge the new party provides, it lends itself as a platform for change.

It must be conceded that the new party remains one birthed in hope, hope that it can deliver on its promise of change, drive public service reform, establish new framework for social and political engagement, introduce a new governance environment founded on openness and accountability, re-dress the trust deficits that mark leadership and public service in our country, enthrone a new economic order that promotes inclusiveness and the wellbeing of every citizen, provides social and economic growths as shorthand for progress, in real term.

And with our polity, under-developed and undemocratic, with impunity showing itself off as the poor outward sign of our governance environment, our task is to insist on the foregoing as irreducible minimums and demand that politicians of the progressive hue sacralise the politics of issues, ideas and principles. Countries of the world that are today witnessing real leaps and human progress are ruled by men and women with vision, leaders who encounter the limits of power by helping citizens recover their role in fashioning the way forward.

Many sceptics who received the news of the birth of the All Progressives Congress flayed it as more of the same, as is the Peoples Democratic Party, lacking ideological verve, driven by the same set of politicians who have made our country what it is today. I make two quick responses to the sceptics, here: first of all, that modern politics is civilised by three distinct elements: personalities, parties and programmes. The progressive way the three elements act and interact on a routine basis invariably allows for the emergence of participatory politics.

The birth of the All Progressive Congress no doubt evidenced the presence of the other element: personalities. What is expected as the new party settles down to its mechanics, nuts and bolts’ dynamics is the fashioning of programmes, fleshed by ideology. And with the Peoples Democratic Party occupying the right of our politics, the All Progressives Congress would have no choice but to contest and occupy the centre left and steer an ideological, catalytic and nationalist course that seeks to promote the Nigerian state as the embodiment of the nation.

Secondly, for all the scepticisms, the contest for political power can only take place within the formal and mobilising structures of political parties; and it is only imperative we engage the new party in a way that enhances its capacity to achieve what is ordinarily the second nature of all political parties: acquiring political power. The All Progressives Congress isn’t a perfect party; but it is perhaps one of the many catalysts of the change we desire.

Wednesday, 13 February 2013

UNILAG student allegedly sells his kidney to graduate with first class

By

According to a report on DeeLinkage, a 24-year-old graduate of the University of Lagos, had to part with his kidney, just so he could graduate with a first class from the institution.
Here is the full story:

A University of Lagos (UNILAG) student who couldn’t swap kidneys to save his father’s life confessed in the hospital that he sold one of his kidney to graduate with a first class.
The 24 years old boy recollected how he sold one of his kidneys to the dean of his faculty a few days before his convocation. He says he was being threatened with the reality of having to spend an additional two years to his already prolonged eight years stay in the school.
He was nearly in tears while he explained why he couldn’t donate his last and only kidney to his father who is in desperate need of a kidney to survive.
Despite him graduating with a first class, it is sad to say he has never been able to secure an adequate job.
So with no kidney, no job, and no money, how does this young boy expect to save his dying father?
No job and not enough money…and now he needs a kidney to save his dad.

DailyPost

‘Presidential primary not necessary if incumbent is running’

 by Turaki A. Hassan & Abbas Jimoh
Chief Max Gbanite, Convener of Concerned PDP Democrats explains why he says the ruling party should dispense with presidential primary saying it is to avoid divisive internal politics. Excerpts:
You said the PDP should abolish the system of presidential primaries to adopt the American model, can you explain how this can work?
Party primaries are necessary to choose flag bearers for political parties before the main election. It is dubbed the election before the election. Sometimes, the real choice of the people may not emerge in party primaries especially when the delegates’ system of selection is involved and money plays a significant role in the choices made. At other times, the primaries become so acrimonious that cracks develop among party members leading to disaffection and defection to other parties.
It has also been established that even when a political party like the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) adopts the conclave system otherwise known as consensus in choosing their candidates, those dissatisfied almost always move against the preferred candidate. The case of Ondo in the last election when some ACN aspirants defected to Labour Party bears mention. What it means therefore is that a political party cannot be too careful in the management of its primaries so as to guard against dissension and anti-party activities.
 You sound as if the process of primaries is entirely flawed...
That was the scenario President Goodluck Jonathan referred to in his last presidential chat when he declared PDP primaries as battle fronts because of the perceived belief that whoever gets or picks the party tickets in a primary election is as good as the winner in the main election. As the ruling party in Nigeria, PDP has faced so many challenges in the management of its internal affairs that even outsiders had expressed concerns over its future. The opposition has in fact been praying for the implosion of PDP which had been in power since the return of Nigeria to democracy in 1999.
 Because of the obvious danger and threat to the continued dominance of PDP, it has become absolutely necessary for the party to take a second look at the rules governing the conduct of its presidential primary.
But sitting presidents have been challenged in primaries in the past....  
Those recurring errors are what should be avoided in the tortuous road of endorsing a candidate for future presidential elections in Nigeria. Yes, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, Dr. Alex Ekwueme and others have severally challenged the incumbent president without success even when they are certain of winning. The truth is that all organs and the processes of power in the ruling party are naturally skewed in favour of the incumbent president. For instance , he is the leader of the party , he contributes over 70 percent of the finances of the party , police , and other security apparatus are all under him as the Cin C , the Federal Executive Council , the economy , anti corruption agencies, just name it are all under his control . It’s near impossibility for an incumbent president to lose his party’s primary ticket. Every patriotic PDP member must look at this proposal purely on its merit and with the experiences of the past. PDP must decide now to realistically re engineer it’s self for the future.
In advanced democracies of the world, especially United States of America whose presidential model we seek to chart, the incumbent President is not subjected to the indignity of primaries because he or she is the symbol or the strength and capacity of the party. He is always given the right of first refusal. In other words, except he declines to re contest, the road is cleared for him to pick the party’s ticket effortlessly.
How does your position square with the presidential aspiration of Ndigbo in 2015?
 Who are their partners in pursuit of such ventures? After President Goodluck Jonathan has done a second term then such matters can be visited. An Igbo president for Nigeria remains a noble, great and fantastic option for Nigeria.
 Is this idea specifically tied to the person of President Jonathan and 2015 or is it something that goes beyond Jonathan?
 Please, for the avoidance of doubt, let me stress that this proposal for the National Executive Committee of the party to amend the PDP constitution to abrogate primaries for our sitting president has nothing to do with President Goodluck Jonathan as a person or with 2015 in focus. It is a most patriotic and pragmatic suggestion on how to show leadership to the nation and ensure that we face any presidential election as a united front. Yes providence has put Jonathan as our president now, but this proposal is beyond him; anybody could be there tomorrow and such a person is bound to enjoy this privilege.
Bickering, animosities, blackmail, big-money-politics, and bad blood often associated with primaries will be spared PDP if it makes it mandatory that an incumbent President produced by the party must get an automatic party ticket for the general election. What is required for the party to do, to meet with the electoral guidelines, is to go through the motion of affirmation where the candidature of the incumbent president is endorsed at a National convention. This is the culture of democracy in America, be it Democrats or Republican Party, and indeed in all civilized democracy.
As earlier canvassed, if this system is adopted, the party will pool resources from all heavy weights to face the main election. It will also avoid the distractions of bitter rivalry. Most importantly, it will checkmate the threats of decampment by aggrieved aspirants, thereby depleting the needed arsenal for the main election.
DailyTrust

Woman special constable, 23, escapes all charges despite driving while using mobile phone which 'likely contributed to' crash which killed motorcyclist


  • Collette Carpenter had phone on loud speaker in her lap at time of collision
  • Motorcyclist David Bartholomew died after colliding with the side of her car, inquest heard
  • CPS said there was not enough evidence to charge her with causing death by careless or dangerous driving
  • Miss Carpenter has been a special constable for three years
By James Rush
Special constable: Collette Carpenter, pictured here arriving at Bournemouth Coroner's Court, was using her mobile when she was involved in a fatal crash
Special constable: Collette Carpenter, pictured here arriving at Bournemouth Coroner's Court, was using her mobile when she was involved in a fatal crash
A woman police officer responsible for issuing fines to drivers for talking on their phone was using her own mobile when she was involved in a fatal crash, an inquest heard yesterday.
Collette Carpenter had the device on loud speaker and rested on her lap to have a conversation with her partner when she pulled out into the path of motorcyclist David Bartholomew.
The 54-year-old father-of-two collided with the side of Miss Carpenter's Peugeot 206, was catapulted into the road at Ferndown, Dorset, and died of horrific injuries hours later on March 20 last year.
When she was interviewed by fellow police officers, Miss Carpenter, 23, lied and claimed she hadn't been using her mobile phone at the time.
The special constable later said she had briefly taken an incoming call before changing her story again and admitted that she had been on the phone for her entire journey with the mobile on loud speaker on her lap.
She claimed that talking on loud speaker with a phone on her lap was 'the same as having a passenger in the car'.
A police accident investigator told the inquest that by using her phone, the off-duty officer had 'very likely' contributed to the crash.
Despite this, the Crown Prosecution Service has not brought any charges against Miss Carpenter over Mr Bartholomew's death.
After the inquest at which a coroner recorded a verdict of accidental death, Mr Bartholomew's family said they had been let down by the justice system.
Lindsey Witcombe, his partner of 12 years, said: 'She (Miss Carpenter) was on a mobile phone and is a special constable who has issued tickets for that.
 
'He wasn't speeding - he wasn't doing anything. I was hoping for justice for him.'
Mr Bartholomew's daughter Charlotte added: 'We are all disappointed and feel very let down.
'She is someone who should have known better and I feel that she has taken no responsibility for what has happened.'
Scene: Motorcyclist David Bartholomew collided into the side of Miss Carpenter's Peugeot 206, was catapulted into the road and died of horrific injuries hours later
Scene: Motorcyclist David Bartholomew collided into the side of Miss Carpenter's Peugeot 206, was catapulted into the road and died of horrific injuries hours later
Mr Bartholomew's son James said: 'She has admitted to changing her story and has shown disrespect to us.'
The inquest heard that Mr Bartholomew was riding a Honda CBF 1,000 bike east along the A31 at Ferndown, Dorset, at the time of the crash at 7.20am on March 20 last year.
Miss Carpenter was talking to partner Rosemary Bonny on the phone when she went to turn right onto the westbound A31 from a side road.
Motorists who were travelling along the road at the time said nobody was breaking the speed limit.
PC John Hayward, the accident investigator for Dorset police, said: 'The use of her mobile phone can only have been a distraction and has very likely contributed to her not seeing the motorcyclist.'
Motorcyclist: The family of David Bartholomew (pictured) have said they have been let down by the justice system
Motorcyclist: The family of David Bartholomew (pictured) have said they have been let down by the justice system
Miss Carpenter, frome Colehill, Wimborne, said she did not see Mr Bartholomew until the collision on the A-road.
When asked about changing her story, she said: 'In the time of the first interview I just panicked and said what I said which I know is not the truth.
'I don't know why I didn't say about the phone. I was in shock, maybe I didn't think it was relevant at the time. I was not distracted.'
Mr Sheriff Payne, the coroner for Bournemouth, Poole and East Dorset, described Miss Carpenter's account of the incoming call as 'total rubbish'.
He added: 'She came up with misleading accounts of what happened.'
The inquest heard Miss Carpenter had completed a driving course for the special constabulary and had dished out six fixed penalties to drivers for using mobile phones during her three years as a special constable.
Mr Bartholomew, from Bere Regis, Dorset, died of a severe brain injury and multiple traumatic fractures.
An off-duty police sergeant carried out CPR on him at the scene but he died later in Poole Hospital.
Miss Witcombe said: 'He was a highly intelligent and talented man. He had two children, James and Charlotte, and the death of their father has been devastating.
'His life was his children and they were absolutely his number one priority.'
She added that he was a 'skilled and careful rider' and said he would never have ridden stupidly.
Mr Bartholomew, who was known as 'Barty', had been a popular figure in Dorset Motorcycle Club at Wareham.
He was a works manager at a metal fabrication firm. His children are James, 27 and Charlotte 25.
Collision: The inquest heard Mr Bartholomew was riding a Honda CBF 1,000 bike east along the A31 at Ferndown, Dorset, at the time of the crash
Collision: The inquest heard Mr Bartholomew was riding a Honda CBF 1,000 bike east along the A31 at Ferndown, Dorset, at the time of the crash
His partner Miss Witcombe today claimed the investigating police officers had urged the CPS to prosecute Collette Carpenter over David Bartholomew but their appeals had no affect.
She said: 'The investigating officers who presented this case to the Crown Prosecution Service and then subsequently appealed the decision not to prosecute, have tried their utmost to get justice for David and get this heard in a court of law.
'The CPS seem to have appointed themselves both judge and jury and disallowed its progress.'
Since 2010 Dorset police has staged a hard-hitting campaign to combat bad driving habits.
Up until December 2011, its 'No Excuse' campaign had caught and fined nearly 30,000 motorists, with nearly half of those stopped for driving without a seatbealt or using a mobile phone.
One motorist who has been penalised in the past wrote on a local internet forum in response to the inquest: 'So much for Dorset Police's 'No Excuses campaign.
'I received three points for having my phone on my lap whilst on loud speaker so it must be an offence.'

CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE: 'INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO PROVIDE A REALISTIC PROSPECT OF CONVICTION'

A spokeswoman for the CPS explained there was not enough evidence to charge Miss Carpenter with causing death by careless or dangerous driving.
She said: 'We were asked in September by Dorset police to review a file of evidence following the death of David Bartholomew.
'The CPS carefully reviewed the file and decided there was insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction.
'In order to charge Ms Carpenter with an offence of death by careless driving or death by dangerous driving we had to prove that her driving fell below or far below the standard required at the time of the collision.
'Two drivers who were the closest to the collision stated that when Ms Carpenter pulled out her manoeuvre was safe and did not inconvenience them.
'This supported Ms Carpenter's account, which stated that she checked both ways before pulling out.
'The evidence showed that Ms Carpenter was using her phone whilst driving but Ms Carpenter stated that her phone was positioned on her lap on loud speaker.
'We also took into consideration that there was no evidence to support that Ms Carpenter was holding her phone at the time of the collision.
'Having considered all the available evidence, we decided that there was insuficient evidence to prove that Ms Carpenter's driving fell below or far below the standard required.
'We fully understand how distressing this is for Mr Bartholomew's family.' 
MailOnline

Schoolboy, 12, hanged himself in bedroom after mother confiscated his mobile phone following two days of arguing

Cain Westcarr, of Gloucester, had been rowing with mother Veronica Lee

  • 'Well respected' pupil pronounced dead at Gloucestershire Royal Hospital
  • Cain was found by brother 40 mins after saying he was going to his room
By Mark Duell
A popular 12-year-old schoolboy nicknamed ‘little Superman’ was found hanging in his bedroom by his brother after his mother confiscated his mobile phone, an inquest heard today.
Cain Westcarr, of Gloucester, had spent two days arguing with his mother Veronica Lee, and was discovered just 40 minutes after saying he was going to his room to listen to music.
Beaufort School student Cain was later pronounced dead at Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, but the inquest heard his act may have been a cry for help and he had not intended to take his life.
Tragic schoolboy: Cain Westcarr, of Gloucester, had spent two days arguing with his mother Veronica Lee, and was discovered just 40 minutes after saying he was going to his room to listen to music
Tragic schoolboy: Cain Westcarr, of Gloucester, had spent two days arguing with his mother Veronica Lee, and was discovered just 40 minutes after saying he was going to his room to listen to music
The coroner said it was a tragic case and children sometimes don’t understand the consequences of their actions. Miss Lee had taken his phone from him one morning in June last year at their home.
She tearfully told the inquest: ‘I don't think he actually wanted to kill himself. I don't think he wanted to live the life he had any more but I don't think he wanted to die. I think it was a cry for help.’
Detective Sergeant Mark Steinhouse, of Gloucestershire Police, said there were no suspicious circumstances and explained that Miss Lee had told his colleagues of the incident with the phone.
 
‘It was officers at the hospital who spoke to Veronica and they relayed back to myself at the address as to where the phone was,’ Detective Sergeant Steinhouse told Gloucestershire Coroners’ Court.
‘We recovered the phone and had (it) examined and didn't find anything on there of any relevance.’
The hearing was also read extracts of Cain's school report, which praised the youngster for being a ‘well respected and popular pupil’ who was ‘respectful’ and an ‘avid reader’.
Home: Cain was found hanging on this road in Gloucester just 40 minutes after saying he was going to his room
Home: Cain was found hanging on this road in Gloucester just 40 minutes after saying he was going to his room
The inquest heard evidence from Jackie Geatches, a family support worker at St Paul's Primary School, who knew Cain and his siblings.
'I don't think he actually wanted to kill himself. I don't think he wanted to live the life he had any more but I don't think he wanted to die. I think it was a cry for help'
Veronica Lee, mother of Cain Westcarr
Assistant Deputy Coroner Tom Osborne asked her: ‘In an incident which must happen probably hundreds and thousands of times every day throughout the country, a parent takes the mobile phone away for a short period or even if it's only until such time as you've cleaned and tidied your room or until you've done your homework, how would Cain react to that?’
She replied: ‘He probably would have been angry with his mum for taking it and perhaps sulked about it.’
Describing how she heard the news of Cain's death, Mrs Geatches said: ‘I didn't believe it at first when I heard. For one minute I don't believe Cain wanted to take his life.
‘I actually think he wanted to inflict pain upon himself. That's how I interpret it. He wanted to see how much pain he could stand and unfortunately it ended in his death.’
A post-mortem examination found Cain had died from hanging. The coroner recorded a verdict of accidental death and said he could not be satisfied that Cain had intended to take his own life.
Treatment: The 12-year-old schoolboy was pronounced dead at Gloucestershire Royal Hospital last June
Treatment: The 12-year-old schoolboy was pronounced dead at Gloucestershire Royal Hospital last June
‘I hear that he is a young man with attitude, not a bad thing,’ Mr Osborne said. ‘In my own school reports I can remember people saying “attitude retarding progress” and it didn't seem to do me any harm.
'He obviously wanted to inflict pain upon himself or indeed pain upon his mother... "I'll show you" sort of attitude... "you've taken my phone away"'
Assistant Deputy Coroner Tom Osborne
‘Part of that was mum taking his phone away from him in order to tidy his room or do something he needed to do.'
Mr Osborne said he did not think Cain understood that 'if you are dead today, you are dead tomorrow'.
He added: ‘They (some children) don't realise, perhaps sometimes it's not a question of re-booting the computer and they all come back to life.
‘He obviously wanted to inflict pain upon himself or indeed pain upon his mother... "I'll show you" sort of attitude... "you've taken my phone away”.
Education: Cain had attended Beaufort School in Gloucester and was described as a 'well respected' pupil
Education: Cain had attended Beaufort School in Gloucester and was described as a 'well respected' pupil
‘I think if one considers the nature of this young man and the nature of his personality, I think it is more than likely than not this was a cry for help or a cry of punishment to his mum or to scare people and so led to an unfortunate turn of events.’
'He probably would have been angry with his mum for taking it and perhaps sulked about it'
Jackie Geatches, family support worker
Mr Osborne urged Miss Lee to remember the good things in Cain's life and not the tragedy of his death.
‘All I would say to you Veronica, as his mum, is that while Cain may have been a difficult lad during his 12 years, I am sure there were many moments during his life where he brought great joy, fun and everything else you do in your family,’ he said.
‘What I would urge you and the rest of your family to do is when you wake up tomorrow morning and remember Cain, remember those occasions rather than the circumstances resulting in his death.
‘If you want to remember him, go back to that school report because there is a lot there you and your family can be mightily proud of.’  Miss Lee did not wish to comment as she left the hearing.
MailOnline