Sunday, 19 May 2013

Man Destroys N66.8million Car Just Because He Was Angry With Dealer (See Photos)



Man Destroyed a car 600x337 Man Destroys N66.8million Car Just Because He Was Angry With Dealer (See Photos)
A man in China hired three people to destroy his Maserati — worth almost half a million dollars — because he was angry with the car dealer last Tuesday.
The owner, identified only as Wang, paid the men to trash his $423,000 Maserati Quattroporte, worth N66.8million naira at the Qingdao International Auto Show.
According to Car News China, Wang claimed the dealer had replaced faulty parts in his vehicle with used parts; he also accused both the dealer and an insurance company of fraud.
The men hired to decimate the Maserati used sledgehammers to batter the windows and body. They wrecked the flashy vehicle in front of hordes of press and bystanders gathered outside the Auto Show
slide 297707 2454594 free Man Destroys N66.8million Car Just Because He Was Angry With Dealer (See Photos)
slide 297707 2454595 free Man Destroys N66.8million Car Just Because He Was Angry With Dealer (See Photos)
slide 297707 2454598 free Man Destroys N66.8million Car Just Because He Was Angry With Dealer (See Photos)
slide 297707 2454601 free Man Destroys N66.8million Car Just Because He Was Angry With Dealer (See Photos)
slide 297707 2454603 free Man Destroys N66.8million Car Just Because He Was Angry With Dealer (See Photos)
NaijaUrban

Bangladesh Factory Safety Accord: At Least 14 Major North American Retailers Decline To Sign



The deadline to sign onto the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh passed on Tuesday, and at least 14 major North American retailers declined to participate.
The agreement, which demands a five-year commitment from participating retailers to conduct independent safety inspections of factories and pay up to $500,000 per year toward safety improvements, has seen greater support abroad than in the U.S.
Major European retailers -- for example, Marks & Spencer and Carrefour -- have joined the agreement. Others who've signed on include companies recently involved with factory disasters in Bangladesh, such as Swedish retailer H&M and Italian fashion house Benetton. A 2010 factory fire at a facility that made cardigans for H&Mkilled 21 people, and Bennetton had a supplier in the Rana Plaza factory that collapsed last month, killing more than 1,100 people.
PVH, parent to Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger, signed the accord, along with Abercrombie & Fitch, which agreed just hours before the deadline. That leaves plenty of U.S. retailers absent from the agreement, according to the Worker Rights Consortium, an international labor monitoring group. However, some retailers, like Walmart, claim they are working on separate initiatives to improve conditions and workplace safety in Bangladesh.
Here are 14 North American retailers manufacturing goods in Bangladesh that have not signed the safety accord:
Companies That Haven't Signed Bangladesh Safety Accord
1 of 15
AP
  • Next
HuffingtonPost

How Jonathan indirectly Funds Terrorism, and Waste Public Funds, By Adeolu Ademoyo



Adeolu Ademoyo
Recently, the Nigerian state was forced to covertly admit that there was indeed a contractual relation of   $40 million with an Israeli firm, Elbit Security Systems, to monitor Internet and computer activities of Nigerians. However, President Jonathan’s retinue of official and unofficial spokespersons have maintained a covert duplicitous disposition on this. They first questioned the veracity of the news only to claim that the contract is justified! They must have been watching the body language of the presidency while hoping that the bad news would go away and perhaps the presidency would quietly continue with the treacherous and unpatriotic contract out of public glare. 
There are some questions Mr. Jonathan’s official and unofficial spokespersons and the Presidency did not answer. Those questions are:  Was $60 million dollars involved in the contract? If so, why did Elbit systems report $40 million? Why can’t President Jonathan hand this money over to the Nigerian Academy of Science and Nigerian Society of Engineers with the marching order to them to provide a Nigerian and an African-centered Cyber defense and intelligence mechanism within a year? I submit that to avoid these questions is to wrongly accept the dubious view that peoples of African descent are genetically inferior to other races; that they are incapable of any scientific endeavor. I challenge anyone who defends the Presidency on this unpatriotic contract to refute this submission.
Paradoxically, as if to justify the contract, something happened. Within the same time frame that Elbit, the Israeli firm was informing us of this contract, Mr. Kingsley Kuku, President Jonathan’s adviser on amnesty on Niger Delta creek terrorists, was informing the American audience that insecurity would return to the Niger Delta if President Jonathan is not re-elected in 2015. Insecurity means terrorism. In a normal republic, the president would have demanded the immediate resignation of Mr. Kingsley Kuku for such open subversion of the republic. But Kuku is still there being paid from the sweat of the taxpayers he threatened with insecurity and terrorism-which means President Jonathan is in full support of Mr. Kingsley Kuku’s statement. This is sad and unacceptable from a President.
Shortly, after Mr. Kuku’s public disclosure, one of the terrorists Mr. Kuku was supposed to have amnestied -Mr. Asari Dokubo –followed with an orchestrated video saying regardless of democratic process, if President Jonathan is not re-elected, insecurity would return to the land. With Dokubo’s video, the distinction between Kingsley Kuku, the President’s adviser and Asari Dokubo, the thug and terrorist became blurred! It did not cross the mind of this thug and terrorist Dokubo that in a democracy anyone-including an incumbent, his principal and mentor, President Jonathan, can be electorally defeated.  Both Dokubo and Kuku did not appeal to President Jonathan’s programs and manifesto. Rather, they both appealed to violence and insecurity-in other words terrorism- as the tool.
Strangely, our President is quiet. By keeping quiet, President Jonathan has acquiesced to the support of a terrorist like Asari Dokubo and by extension has become a candidate of a terrorist in the 2015 elections. Hence, in view of the fact that President Jonathan’s government is amnestying the creek terrorists to guard oil pipeline (as he is hoping to do with the OPC ethnic militia in the west) one is a bit confused about the meaning and value of President Jonathan’s amnesty program to the creek terrorists and Mr. Kuku’s job description.  While Mr. Kuku and Mr. Dokubo have   a right to their opinions on the return of terrorism to the land, the question for Mr. Kuku and Mr. Jonathan is: why will Mr. Dokubo who has been amnestied with public money bounce back as a renewed and re-invigorated terrorist? Did we waste public funds in amnestying Mr. Dokubo and his consortium and franchise of creek terrorists? Is the presidency by other means using amnesty money to fund terrorism? The proposed questionable oil pipeline security contract to OPC ethnic militia to “police” and “guard” south western oil pipelines is instructive here. These are serious and grievous considerations in the republic.
But Kuku and Dokubo are not alone in this threat to the republic.  Both Mr. Kuku and Mr. Dokubo’s comments only gave a creek face to Mr. Adamu Ciroma and Mr. Lawal Kaita’s prior comments from the savannah shortly after the 2011 elections.  Ciroma and Kaita savannah subversive proclamations are fillips to Kuku and Dokubo creek sabotaging response. The only difference is that Mr. Ciroma and Mr. Kaita are “old School”. They did not use video format the way Dokubo has done. But while the MEND and other creek terrorism franchise is cognate to Kuku and Dokubo, Boko Haram savannah terrorism franchise is cognate to Ciroma and Kaita.  However, even when Ciroma and Kaita may be “old fashioned”, Abubakar Shekau the video “leader” of Boko Haram is analogous to Asari Dokubo. Both are trendier and more contemporary. They now use YouTube for visual effect. I guess soon they will start using facebook and tweets to showcase their “trendy” terrorism franchise. More importantly, while Ciroma and Kaita are precursors to Kuku and Dokubo, Farouk Aliyu is a more recent entrant to the use of freedom of speech to give public face to terrorist threat to the republic.
And talking about funding, Boko Haram, which recently uploaded another YouTube to claim responsibility for the killings in Baga and Bama in Borno state, has not found time to upload YouTube to deny that it collected 500 million naira to free French hostages. At the ethical level, given Boko Haram’s claim to Islam and given that all   religions enjoin us to say the truth, and given that truth saying is an ethical issue, we are surprised that Boko Haram is running away from being “bold” and “courageous” as usual. It seems Boko Haram is not bold and courageous enough on question of simple ethics i.e. to say the truth about the alleged 500 million naira it reportedly collected. One wonders why a “religious” group will be “courageous” to kill but is not courageous to tell the truth and be ethical as taught by religions. Terrorists of all hues must have a funny notion of the virtue of courage and boldness. It may be that Boko Haram is finding it difficult to hold onto a righteous ground hence it is praying that the news go away.
However, in an open democratic republic, the news of the blood money may not go away so soon for if there is a collector of blood money, there is a payer. So who paid this money to Boko Haram? This may be one out of the numerous reasons the President of the Republic; President Jonathan is hiring Elbit, the Israeli firm for intelligence gathering even when the real question is whether   we need an Israeli firm to be able to see the connection between Boko Haram and MEND/ creek terrorist franchises, and the franchises’ public faces like Messers Kuku, Aliyu, Ciroma, Kaita and Dokubo who have used their freedom of speech to subvert the republic and the nation’s democracy? This is because if Asari Dokubo and, his sponsors are right that there is a connection between Ciroma, Kaita and Aliyu’s comments on one hand and Boko Haram’s terrorism on the other, by that same   Dokubo and sponsors’ logic, there is a connection between Kuku and Dokubo and their sponsors on one hand and the Niger Delta creek terrorism on the other hand.
Looking back, the president of the Republic, Mr. Jonathan once lend credence to all these when he confirmed   with his own mouth that there are members of Boko Haram terrorist group in his presidency. That also implies that there are members of the Niger Delta creek terrorist groups in the presidency.  This is a question for citizens in the republic to engage and not for a foreign company-Elbit- whose interest is legitimately and purely economic. Such economic interest will never be Nigerian nor will they be African. We citizens of the republic are the only ones that can make Nigerian and African interests the core center of our lives, not a foreign company.  Fellow citizens, what do you think?
PremiumTimes

Article of Faith: Coincidences Don’t Exist, By Femi Aribisala



Femi Aribisala
God is not a coincidental God.
My DVD player has a slow-motion application.  When you press it, you see the film you are watching in slow-motion.  That way, you are likely to notice things you would otherwise have overlooked.  When I first met the Lord, he set my life to slow-motion for the first two to three months so I could see things I had not noticed before.  Suddenly, I discovered that everything about my life followed an ordered pattern.  There was discernibly a guiding hand to all the things happening around me.
I would ask the Lord a question and wait for him to answer; and he answered every time.  But what was fascinating was the way he answered.  In some cases, he answered directly in my mind.  But more often than not, he used the things around me to answer.  I would turn on the television and he would use someone on the screen to speak to me.  Someone would come to visit me and would answer my question without my asking.  I would open my bible and the answer would speak to me from one of the pages.
On one occasion, I asked the Lord a question while driving.  When I looked up, the answer was there; boldly written on a billboard.  I then wondered whether the billboard was a vision or whether it was really there.  So I went back again on the same route.  When I got there, the billboard was right there, with the same message on it.  Apparently, it had been there for a while.  But why was it that the exact time I asked the Lord the question was the exact time I drove past the billboard?  Did I ask the question or did the Lord cause me to ask it at that particular time?  Your guess is as good as mine.
After some time, the Lord switched off the slow-motion and everything went back to normal speed.  But now I know it is up to me to be observant.  Accordingly, I now spend every day of my life on the look-out for God.  I make it my business to know what God is doing in the situations and circumstances of my life.  It is my business to know the purpose he has purposed for me.  Jesus says: “I must work the works of him who sent me while it is day; the night is coming when no one can work.” (John 9:4).
Finger of God
Once, the Police arrested my former Business Manager, Ernest Oboh, on trumped-up charges.  I had to go to the station to see what I could do.  Before I left, I said a short prayer asking God for help.  I asked him for the favour of God and the favour of man.
When I got to the Police Station, I spoke to the arresting officer.  The man listened to me intently for a few minutes and then directed that my Manager be released immediately.  Then he gave me his reasons.  He said to me: “I am releasing him for three reasons.  I am releasing him because I have a lot of respect for people who have grey hair, and you have a lot of it.  I am releasing him because I understand you have a doctorate, and I just have lots of respect for people who have doctorates.  I am releasing him because you are a pastor, and I just have a lot of respect for pastors.”
I told the officer: “I am sorry to disagree with you, Sir.  You are not releasing him because of any of those reasons.  You are releasing him because before I came here, I went down on my knees and prayed and asked God to give me favour.”
You see, right from the beginning of that episode, God brought the case to a man whose mind he had already prepared to be sympathetic to me.  All the issues about grey hairs and doctorates were simply the devices of God.  Somebody else could have hated me precisely because my hair was grey, and he could have hated me for having a doctorate.
Strategically-placed helpers
Many years ago, some Liberian refugee members of our fellowship were arrested for “loitering,” and we had to go to the police station to secure their release.  So we knelt down and asked God to take control.  When we got to the Station, we were directed to the office of the Divisional Commander.  Immediately I walked into his office, I saw the kingdom of God.  All over the walls were posters with slogans affirming the supremacy of Christ.
When I sat down, I said to the DCO: “I see, Sir, that you are a Christian.”  In answer to that question, he and I started sharing testimonies about the goodness of the Lord.  This went on for some thirty minutes, after which he suddenly said: “By the way, why have you come to see me?”
I told him some members of our fellowship were arrested for “loitering,” and I wanted to see if I could secure their release.  The policeman was angry.  “For loitering!” he exclaimed.  He not only directed they be released immediately, but that those who arrested them should be locked up.
Don’t panic
Joy Ogwu’s son was going back to the United States from Nigeria.  He had an American passport and a Nigerian passport simultaneously.  He came in with his Nigerian passport, which meant he did not have a Nigerian visa.  But if he tried to leave with his Nigerian passport, they would require him to show a visa for his destination.  That meant he would have to show his American passport.  But dual nationality had then been suspended in Nigeria.  If he only showed his American passport, they would ask him how he got into the country without a Nigerian visa.
It was a “Catch 22” situation.  Joy took the matter to God and asked for his help.  Then she went to the airport with her son.  But on getting there, she had a panic attack.  Perhaps there was someone she knew who could help her?  Perhaps if she spoke politely to the immigration official he would overlook the matter?  Perhaps; perhaps; perhaps.  Finally, the Holy Spirit spoke: “Did you not ask me for help?  So why are you still anxious?”
Remorseful, she stood there in the middle of the airport terminal apologising to God.  She had scarcely finished praying her apologies when someone called her name.  “Professor Ogwu is that you?”  She looked up to see this distinguished military officer standing in front of her with a big grin on his face.  “What are you doing here?” he asked.  “My son is travelling to the United States.”  “Where is he?” the man asked taking charge.  He took charge so completely he ushered him past immigration and literally on to the plane.  Problem solved.
When Joy told her husband what happened, he was unimpressed.  “It was just a coincidence,” he insisted.  Coincidence my foot!  Our God is not a coincidental God.
Femi Aribisala is the fellowship coordinator of Healing Wings. 
PremiumTimes

Article of Faith: God Does Not Forbid Bad Thing, By Femi Aribisala



Femi Aribisala
The report of the Lord is first and foremost a bad report. 
There is a misunderstanding prevalent among Christians, especially those weaned on the “prosperity gospel.”  It is assumed that when the Lord gives a report, he always gives a good report, and that the report of the devil is always bad.  Thus, we say repeatedly in “Naijanese:” “God forbid bad thing.”  However, this comes from fundamental lack of understanding of Jesus’ kingdom dynamics.
In the kingdom of God, the way up is down.  The Lord kills and makes alive.  He makes poor and makes rich.  He brings low and lifts up. (1 Samuel 2:6-7).  He wounds and he heals. (Deuteronomy 32:39).  Therefore, before the Lord gives a good report, he first gives a bad report.
God’s bad reports
If the report of the Lord were always good, as is commonly assumed, why would Isaiah ask: “Who has believed our report?” (Isaiah 53:1).  What is so difficult to believe about a good report?  If the report of the Lord were the same as the prosperity messages prevalent in the churches of today, why were the prophets of God in the bible often beaten up, jailed and killed?  Thus, Jesus lamented: “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you.” (Luke 13:34).
The truth is the report of the Lord is first and foremost a bad report.  Why else would Jeremiah bring charges against the Lord?  He complains: “O Lord, you deceived me when you promised me your help. I have to give them your messages because you are stronger than I am, but now I am the laughingstock of the city, mocked by all.  You have never once let me speak a word of kindness to them; always it is disaster and horror and destruction.” (Jeremiah 20:7-8).
Because this world is steeped in evil and corruption, the report of the Lord is often bad.  It is usually of God’s anger at the sins of men and of his impending judgment.  But inside that bad report is often buried the promise of a conditionally good report.  Thus, Noah gave the bad report that God would destroy mankind in a flood.  However, he also said those who took refuge in the ark would be saved.  It is the devil and his agents that give good reports which then turn out to be bad.  They are determined to give us a false sense of security.
Let us go back to Genesis to get a foundational understanding of this kingdom dynamic.  God told Adam at the dawn of creation: “Of every tree of the garden you may freely eat; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.” (Genesis 2:16-17).
This was a bad report and it came from God.  It was a report of certain death as a consequence of disobedience.  Who then gave the good report?  It was the devil.  “The serpent said to the woman, “You will not surely die.  For God knows that in the day you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” (Genesis 3:4-5).
Whose report did Eve believe?  She believed the good report of the devil and rejected the bad report of the Lord.  Therefore she ate the forbidden fruit and also gave it to Adam, her husband.  Immediately they ate the forbidden fruit, Adam and Eve died spiritually.  Their death was not forbidden by the Lord: their death was decreed by the Lord.
The tendency to reject the bad report of the Lord in favour of the good report of the devil is endemic.  In the case of Adam and Eve, it resulted in their being driven out of the Garden of Eden and denied access to the Tree of Life. (Genesis 3:24).  Today, it results in Christians being denied entry into the kingdom of heaven.
Double-edged sword
Why is God’s good news often hidden in his bad news?  The answer lies in the surgical nature of the word of God.  It is like a double-edged sword. (Hebrews 4:12).  Thus, the Lord asks Jeremiah: “Is not my word like a fire and like a hammer that breaks the rock in pieces?” (Jeremiah 23:29).  Fire consumes the chaff, so the word of God burns and consumes fake Christians.  But fire also purifies, so the word of God purifies true Christians.  The hammer, of course, is used both to destroy and to build.
The same pillar of cloud that brought darkness to the Egyptians provided light for the Israelites. (Exodus 14:19-20).  The same Red Sea which destroyed the Egyptians saved the Israelites.  Similarly, the gospel leads many to condemnation, even as it leads a few to salvation.  Jesus says: “the last will be first, and the first last. For many are called, but few chosen.” (Matthew 20:16).
Thus, the word of God is often bad news and good news simultaneously.  But it is usually bad news before it is good news.  Jesus, the word of God, would cause the bad to happen before the good would happen.  Indeed, his speciality would be in bringing the good out of the bad.  Accordingly, Simeon prophesied that Jesus will cause people to fall before causing them to rise: “This child is destined to cause the falling and rising of many in Israel.” (Luke 2:34).
Therefore, James counsels believers: “Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and he will lift you up.” (James 4:10).  Jesus himself also says: “Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted.” (Matthew 23:12).
Stumbling-stone
Couched in this manner, the greatest trap of all will be Jesus himself.  Isaiah warns: “He will be as a sanctuary, but a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense to both the houses of Israel, as a trap and a snare to the inhabitants of Jerusalem.  And many among them shall stumble; they shall fall and be broken, be snared and taken.” (Isaiah 8:14-15).  As we run from the bad that following Jesus entails, we miss the good he provides.  Jesus says: “You will be hated by all nations for my name’s sake… But he who endures to the end shall be saved.” (Matthew 24:9/13).
Accordingly, the gospel is bad news to those who reject its bad report.  But it turns out to be good news to those who accept its bad report.  What is the bad report before the good report of the gospel?  Jesus says: “Whoever loses his life will preserve it.” (Luke 17:33).  “In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world.” (John 16:33).  “Whoever of you does not forsake all that he has cannot be my disciple.” (Luke 14:33).
Don’t say to this: “God forbid bad thing.”  The rich young ruler came to Jesus seeking eternal life.  The gospel required him to sell all he had, give the proceeds to the poor and then follow Jesus.  But the man rejected the bad news of losing his wealth and, thereby, forfeited the good news of inheriting eternal life.
Even so, those who reject the bad news of the gospel forfeit its good news.
Femi Aribisala is the fellowship coordinator of Healing Wings. 
PremiumTimes

Democrats' Senate Campaigns Marked By Internal Wrangling



By BILL BARROW and THOMAS BEAUMONT
ATLANTA — Republicans aren't the only ones roiled by internal jostling and recruiting hiccups ahead of next year's midterm elections.
Two top-tier Democratic prospects recently bypassed running for Senate seats in Georgia and South Dakota, highlighting both divisions within the party and its challenge of finding candidates whose ideologies line up with voters in Republican-leaning states.
Democrats say they'll be fine even though Rep. John Barrow in Georgia and former Rep. Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin in South Dakota declined to seek seats left open by retirements. Both are moderate-to-conservative Democrats whose views would seemingly play well in their states, giving the party a chance to win on GOP turf as Democrats look to hang onto power in the Senate. But without them running, Democrats probably will be forced to back more liberal, less-tested nominees who would likely have tougher races.
The circumstances underscore a particular challenge for Democrats: They have a six-seat cushion, counting Vice President Joe Biden's ability to cast tie-breaking votes. That requires Republicans to nearly sweep the most competitive races to gain enough seats for control. But many of the contests are in states where President Barack Obama never won and remains unpopular.
Another hurdle for Democrats: Midterm electorates are generally older, whiter and more Republican than in presidential years.
Georgia Democrats are hoping to recruit Michelle Nunn, daughter of former Sen. Sam Nunn and a nonprofit executive in Atlanta. She's expected to announce a decision soon in the race to succeed retiring Republican Sen. Saxby Chambliss.
In the contest for retiring Democratic Sen. Tim Johnson's South Dakota seat, Democrats' preferred candidate now appears to be Rick Weiland, once a top aide to former Sen. Tom Daschle and twice an unsuccessful candidate for Congress. Weiland launched his bid, with Daschle's backing, amid clamoring about Herseth-Sandlin and Johnson's son, Brendan, a U.S. attorney. State Democrats now say the younger Johnson likely won't run.
"It's a recipe for a challenging campaign," said Steve Dick, a former Daschle aide. "It's a tough race, without a doubt. And it's getting more difficult. We're a red state. We just don't have these opportunities that often."
South Dakota is one of three states where a Democratic senator is retiring in a state Obama lost last November; the others are Montana and West Virginia. There also are Democratic retirements in the swing-voting states of Iowa and Michigan, which Obama won.
Republicans also are aiming at four Democratic incumbents in states Republican Mitt Romney won: Mark Begich of Alaska, Kay Hagan of North Carolina, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Mark Pryor of Arkansas. Georgia, which went for Romney by 8 percentage points over Obama, has one of two GOP seats opened by retirements; the other is in Nebraska, a virtual lock for Republicans.
Democrats say they can challenge Minority Leader Mitch McConnell in Kentucky, but they haven't yet recruited a top-tier candidate even though the Republican is unpopular at home.
At the National Republican Senatorial Committee, spokesman Brad Dayspring mocked Democrats for failing at a strategy he says was clear: Get conservative Democrats in Republican-leaning states. But Justin Barasky, spokesman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, dismissed the notion of an internal Democratic struggle or recruiting woes, and pointed to divisive primaries shaping up for Republicans in several states.
Clearly, Democrats are left with a tricky balance as they look for candidates with this criteria: Satisfy core Democratic voters, ensure successful fundraising and reach independents who voted for Romney and, before him, John McCain and George W. Bush.
Some Democrats thought Barrow and Herseth-Sandlin satisfied those standards.
Barrow is the Deep South's last white Democrat in the House, and he's beaten well-financed GOP nominees in a House district drawn to ensure his defeat. He's a gun owner who voted against the 2010 health care overhaul and voted to hold Obama's attorney general, Eric Holder, in contempt of Congress. He supported the so-called fiscal cliff deal between Obama and congressional Republicans, and successfully wooed thousands of Romney supporters in his last campaign.
But the way Barrow keeps his job could explain why he abandoned the possibility of a promotion.
"His profile is more appropriate to his congressional district than to a statewide run, particularly for metro Atlanta, where most of the votes are in the progressive base," said state Sen. Vincent Fort, a Democrat from the city.
Some Democrats had feared that Barrow would have drawn a primary opponent, and both national and state Democrats concede that the party's best chance for a Georgia upset is to avoid a divisive primary, while leaving a crowded GOP field to spend money and throw punches.
Fort said Nunn would be a compelling candidate. And Democrats, eager to dispute the notion that losing Barrow is a disappointment, point to polling commissioned by Senate Democrats that suggests Nunn would be the better candidate in a general election.
Former Rep. George "Buddy" Darden said Nunn's lack of experience could be an asset. She doesn't have a record to parse and can run as an outsider, he said, a particular upside if Republicans nominate one of the three sitting congressmen who are running.
GOP Reps. Paul Broun, Phil Gingrey and Jack Kingston are joined by Karen Handel, a former executive with the Susan G. Komen Foundation, the breast cancer organization, in a race that could draw additional, well-financed candidates. Georgia is just one of several states where Republicans face the prospect of divisive primaries.
In South Dakota, Herseth-Sandlin had been seen by national Democrats as a top-tier prospect because her profile fit the state, and they were aggressively courting her behind the scenes. The 42-year-old Sioux Falls lawyer was taking steps toward running, hoping to avoid a divisive primary in which her opposition to the health care bill in 2010 and support for a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage in 2004 would be used against her.
Weiland, meanwhile, quickly entered the race, in part to keep Herseth-Sandlin out, a sign of tension between the moderate and liberal wings. Weiland, who lost to Herseth-Sandlin in the 2004 House primary, is a close Daschle ally.
Brendan Johnson, also a Daschle ally, would not challenge Weiland, especially in a state where successful Democrats are rare and clubby. However, Weiland, while a seasoned party operative, would likely bow out, should the younger Johnson assess the race over the summer and decide to enter in the fall.
That scenario becomes more probable should the race for the Republican nomination become contested, South Dakota Democrats said.
Former Gov. Mike Rounds is running and his fellow Republicans view him as a solid candidate. Yet popular GOP newcomer Kristi Noem, elected to the House in 2010, hasn't ruled out a candidacy. She's popular with the tea party and is seen as a better fundraiser than Rounds.
HuffingtonPost

Gold Worth Millions Of Dollars Carted Away In Sharjah Gold Heist



COMMODITIES ROAR / Gold Bars
Sharjah Police are hunting for clues to two separate robberies which netted thieves a large quantity of gold.
In the first case, police are probing details of a daring robbery of Diplomat gold workshop in Sharjah on Wednesday around 8pm when a salesman was attacked in the premises and 4.5kg of gold, valued at millions of dirhams was stolen.
Police said the suspect tricked the salesmen, then slashed his face before fleeing the premises in the Al Suer area of Sharjah.
The Criminal Investigation Department discovered the man bleeding when they responded to the call for assistance at the shop.
Forensic experts swept the crime scene for fingerprints.
The injured salesman, meanwhile, was transferred to Al Kuwaiti Hospital for treatment where his condition was described as serious.
The workshop did not have surveillance cameras or an alarm system which made it an easy target for the robbers, police said.
InformationNigeria