Friday, 16 August 2013

Bianca Onoh: Fani-Kayode backtracks, expresses “deep regrets over indiscretion” (READ)



femi fani-kayode...
by Isi Esene
Former minister of aviation, Femi Fani-Kayode has been in the eye of the storm following his mention of certain individuals who he purportedly had “long-standing intimate relationship” with. Those mentioned include the widow of the late Biafran warlord, Emeka Odumegwu Ojukwu; Chioma Anasoh and Adaobi Uchegbu.
[READ: Femi Fani-Kayode: The bitter truth about the Igbo]
Fani-Kayode who has written several articles to buttress his point over the undue encroachment of the Igbos into the South-west region of the country defended his stance saying he could not have been an ethnic bigot if he, at a time in his life, had engaged in intimate relationships with these women.
[READ: Femi Fani-Kayode: Lagos, the Igbo and the servants of truth]
In a statement signed by Bisi Lawal, Fani-Kayode’s Press Secretary, the former minister “expressed deep regrets for mentioning the names of three distinguished Nigerian ladies that he was once associated with” stating that he meant no harm.
[READ: A rejoinder: On the Igbos – Of Femi Fani-Kayode’s ignorance and a proud display of it]
Read the full statement below:
Chief Femi Fani-Kayode hereby expresses his deepest regrets for mentioning the names of three distinguished Nigerian ladies that he was once associated with in his last article titled ”A Word For Those Who Say I am A Tribalist’‘.
He meant no harm by doing so and neither did he at any point make references to having had any sexual relations with any of these ladies when they were associated with him as is being suggested by some members of the public. He was simply trying to emphasise the fact that he has nothing against the Igbo people and that his friendship with these three ladies in particular over the years provided some evidence of that.
[READ: Elnathan John: About Femi Fani-Kayode’s ‘bitter truth’]
For the record he has not seen Madame Chioma Anasoh, Chief Adaobi Kate Uchegbu and Ambassador Bianca Onoh in many years and he admits that it was inappropiate for him to have mentioned their names in the essay, to use them as a point of reference in a public discussion or to make any references whatsoever to the nature of their past association. All references to them have been erased from the updated version of the essay.
[READ: Opinion: Femi Fani-Kayode attended the best schools but lacks class]
Chief Fani-Kayode has reached two of the ladies concerned and he has personally conveyed his unreserved apology to them both and to their families for his indiscretion. He shall endeavour to reach the third lady to do the same in the next few days. Chief Fani-Kayode has nothing more to say on this matter and would prefer to remain focused on issues of national importance and not of a personal nature.
 

Opinion: No! Pastor Adeboye, your approach is wrong

by Peniel Plus
adeboye
“We need N1 Billion from ten (10) people, If you are one of them, please see my personal Secretary after we finish today. We also need N100million from those who can afford it, if you are in that category, please see my personal Secretary as well….
Let’s put our minds into any gad***n church, any gad***n mosque, any gad***n Celestical (Celestial), including Sera-FUM (Seraphim) and Cheru-BUM (Cherubim). And you non-Christians, listen to me with open mind”NO
Two nights ago, I took a break from research work, decided to watch news on local television and catch up with goings-on in the polity. After the news, I was not quite enjoying an old movie flick, ‘Broken Arrow’ featuring John Travolta and Christian Slater, being shown on one of the stations and decided to flip to another station. My remote control took me to the 61st Annual Convention of the Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG) and I was just too happy to catch up with the Convention in my living room. Anointing can be anywhere, if faith is exuded like the Centurion.
Then before sermon, General Overseer of RCCG, Pastor Adeboye made a special announcement. The church is to build a new auditorium, stretching 3km in length and width, and four times the size of the present auditorium, to accommodate many more parishioners, before next year’s convention. Everyone was naturally excited, particularly those who get to camp ground late and cannot  be seated in the present auditorium. Then Pastor Adeboye shocked me with the following pronouncement:
“We need N1 Billion from ten (10) people, If you are one of them, please see my personal Secretary after we finish today. We also need N100million from those who can afford it, if you are in that category, please see my personal Secretary as well. Nonetheless, we need everyone’s involvement. If you can afford N50million, N20million, N5million, N1million to as low as N100, kindly make sure you participate. How many of you will build for the Lord?” All hands naturally went up in delirium.
I could not believe my eyes. I should not bother myself with how a church raises money to finance projects but a dangerous trend is being set and we are made to believe if we cannot ‘donate’ a certain amount of money, we cannot see Daddy G.O.’s personal Secretary. Such ‘privilege’ is for those that can donate handsomely for the work of God. Assuming a rich man in the Convention donates N1Billion effortlessly and a widow, whose next source of meal is unsure, donates her last N100; who among the two should see Pastor Adeboye’s personal Secretary? Well the answer lies in Luke 21:1-4 and Mark 12:41-44, where Jesus Christ acknowledged the poor widow who donated two copper coins (mite) over the rich donors and said “Truly I tell you, this poor widow has put more into the treasury than all the others. They all gave out of their wealth; but she, out of her poverty, put in everything—all she had to live on”.
How do we begin to justify asking members of a congregation to donate such a huge amount of money when poverty is smiling at most of the country’s citizens? The last time they were told to donate generously for the Lord towards a University project, as ordained by God, they all gladly did. The sad thing is atN510,000 per session for College of Humanities (100L & 200L), N520 for Management Science students and N550 for Natural Sciences students; Redeemer’s University is not for a Redeemer whose minimum wage is around N18,000. So they have contributed to a project, believing they are sowing for God, yet cannot send their wards/kids to such schools. Interestingly, many of the Pastors (and church leaders) running private Universities today, all enjoyed free education (absolutely free, including free lunch of Rice and Chicken – every Sunday) under Awolowo’s magnanimity. Education is now for rich members only but poor members are not exempt from donations. Hmmmm!
If the project was for research on AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, I would not bat an eyelid. If it was for national fight against Polio eradication in Nigeria like the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation in Africa, we would see the immediate benefits. If it was some sort of entrepreneurial aid to jobless youths, we would feel the impact as a nation. In spite of Bill and Melinda Gates contributions to Polio eradication, Nigeria remains the only African country (not Rwanda, not Mali, not Somalia or Sudan) where Polio is endemic and she shares this feat with Pakistan  and Afghanistan. Interestingly, Pakistan reduced the number of polio cases from 198 in 2011 to 56 in 2012; Afghanistan saw a decrease from 80 to 35 during the same period, however, Nigeria increased from 62 in 2011 to 119 in 2012.
In 2013, The Gates foundation committed a fresh $1.8 Billion to the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) out of the $5.5 Billion required. Britain contributed $457 million, Canada donated $250 million while $240 million came from Norway. Even the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahayan donated $120 million. Remarkably, these donations from foreign countries are geared towards solving the Polio scourge in 3 countries, Nigeria included. Foreigners help us to fight major health challenges while our idea of development is in gigantic buildings to be used once or twice a month for religious purposes. Our own priority in Nigeria isowning jets, breaking heads with mace, fighting for 2015 elections and building bigger auditoriums. Is it not clear why we are not developing as a country?
The message I got from the pulpit was clear, concise and profound. It does not matter where the N1 Billion comes from, provided it is donated for God’s work. Ever wonder why it is difficult for Pastors and General Overseers to condemn those who have looted our treasury? Recall when Cecelia Ibru and Erastus Akingbola had front row seats at major religious conventions in Nigeria? Did any Pastor speak against their deeds, like Nathan confronted and condemned King David in 2 Samuel 12? The subtle message is clear: “we need your money for the work of God and it does not matter how you get it”. Those who have sincerely worked hard for their wealth will only donate to worthy causes such as Aliko Dangote did when he announced a relief fund contribution of N2.5 Billion to the relief effort of flood victims in 2012.
So many churches in Nigeria have big auditoriums, yet the level of violence, ethnic hatred, treasury looting and corruption alarmingly increases in a directly proportionate way to the number of churches/mosques available. As a country, we do not need larger auditoriums but men with larger hearts (including me) with genuine love for his/her neighbour. I have been taught to obey and respect authority, more so clergy (that’s why Pastors are ‘gods’ here). I will never say Pastor Adeboye is wrong but in my honest opinion, he chose a wrong approach.
The opening quote is an expression in one of Fela’s songs. If only we can all have open minds, we may yet realise that what we need in Nigeria are religious leaders who can speak out against evil without mincing words. Excuse me please, I have to find my own N1 Billion now, so I can have pastoral access. Shalom!

YNaija

Thursday, 15 August 2013

Why-President-Jonathan-is-not-eligible-to-contest-in-2015 - Okoi Obono-Obla

Why-President-Jonathan-is-not-eligible-to-contest-in-2015
 
In a seminal thought-provoking analysis, Okoi Obono-Obla, a lawyer and chieftain of the APC who was Deputy National Secretary of the defunct CPC, makes a case against President Jonathan’s re-election bid in 2015…

It is a notorious fact that on the 6th May, 2010, in a solemn but sober ceremony in the Office of the then Chief Justice of Niger...
ia, Honourable Justice Aloysius Katsina-Alu administered the Oath of Office and Oath of Allegiance as enjoined by the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, on the then

Acting-President Goodluck Jonathan as the 5th President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria following the death of then President Umaru Musa Yar’adua.

It is well settled that by virtue the provisions of Section 146 (1) of the Constitution the Vice-President shall hold the office of President if the office of the President becomes vacant by reason of death or resignation or impeachment, permanent incapacity or the removal of the President from office for any reason in accordance with the provisions of Section 143 of the Constitution. It was obvious that it was Section 146 (1) of the Constitution that was invoked to give legitimacy and constitutionality to President Jonathan’s swearing in as President on the 6th May, 2010.

On the 29th May, 2011, President Jonathan was sworn in as the 6th President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria after he was declared the winner of the Presidential Election held on the 16th April, 2011, by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). Accordingly, President Jonathan took the Oath of Office and Oath of Allegiance as enjoined by the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (supra) for the second time.

It goes without saying that President Jonathan has taken the Oath of Office and Oath of Allegiance twice, thus: on the 6/5/2010 & 29/5/2011 respectively. The pertinent question is: What is the constitutional implication or consequences of the taking of the Oath of Office and Oath of Allegiance twice by President Jonathan?

By the provisions of Section 135 (1) & (2) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, no President can take the Oath of Office more than twice. President Jonathan first took the Oath of Office on the 6th May, 2010, as President after the death of late President Umaru Musa Yaradua. President Jonathan then took another Oath of Office on the 29th May, 2011, after INEC had declared him the winner of the Presidential Election held on the 16th April, 2011.

Section 135 (1) & (2) of the Constitution provide thus:

“(1) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, a person shall hold the office of President until – (a) his successor in office takes the oath of office; (b) he dies whilst holding such office; or (c) the date when his resignation from office takes effect; or (d) he otherwise ceases to hold office in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution. (2) Subject to the provisions of subsection (1) of this section, the President shall vacate his office at the expiration of a period of four years commencing from the date, when – (a) in the case of a person first elected as President under this Constitution, he took the Oath of Allegiance and the Oath of office; and (b) in any case, the person last elected to that office under this Constitution took the Oath of Allegiance and the Oath of office but for his death, have taken such oaths”.

President Jonathan was elected Vice-President in 2007. However became President on the 6th May, 2010, to complete the tenure of President Umaru Musa Yar’adua which would have expired on the 28th May, 2011. It goes without saying that President Jonathan inherited the tenure of President Yaradua. After President Jonathan became President on the 6th May, 2010, he is deemed to have been “First elected” to come under the contemplation of Section 135 (1) (b) of the Constitution. Ordinarily President Jonathan would have been deemed “First elected” on the 29th May, 2011, if he had not become President on the 6th May, 2010. President Jonathan did not become Vice President by selection. He was elected Vice President. He contested the Presidential Election of 2007 alongside the then President Yar’adua. He was then regarded as an associate of President Yar’adua. He cannot extricate himself from President Yaradua’s tenure. After he took over as President on the 6th May, 2010 he was deemed to have continued with the term or tenure of President Yaradua. That tenure ended on the 29th May, 2011. The relevant provisions of the Constitution especially Sections 130, 132, 134, 137, 141, 142, 143, 144 and 146 thereof must be interpreted or construed holistically not in isolation from one another.

In ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE FEDERATION vs. ATIKU ABUBAKAR (2007) 10 NWLR (Pt.1041) 1, Sunday Akinola Akintan, J.S.C. (reading the Lead Judgment) said thus: “ … As I have already stated above, the office of the Vice President is created by the Constitution. His appointment and removal from office are also provided for in the Constitution. Although the President had to nominate him as at the time he wanted to contest for the office of the President, and the Constitution also requires that the person nominated should be from the same political party as the President, I believe that the Constitution assumes that the President and the Vice President should maintain the same relationship throughout their term in office.

The Nigeria Constitution, like the American Presidential System, envisages single executive power for which the President is the head and in whom the executive powers are vested. Article 11 of the Constitution of the United States, just like section 5(1) of our Constitution, provides that “the executive power shall be vested in a President of the United State.” The principle implies the preclusion of a current vesting of the executive powers in two or more persons of equal authority. The Principle also has the effect that the legislative organ cannot take away from the President or confer on others, functions of a strictly executive nature: See Myers v. United States 272. US 52; Nowak And Rotunde, Constitutional Law, 6th edition paragraph 7.14, page 298; and Nwabueze, Constitutional Democracy in Africa, (Vol. 4) Forms of Government, page 76. One of the implications of the principles of a single executive, as relates to the Vice President, is that although the office of Vice President is, unlike that of a minister under the system, an elective one, he is not voted in a separate election, but by the very same votes by which the President is elected. This is because, as already shown above, a Presidential candidate is required to nominate another candidate to run with him on the same ticket as mate or associate” for the office of Vice President. I believe that the unity contemplated by the arrangement transcends the election. I also believe and hold that their relationship should be throughout their joint term.

The position is as aptly described by Prof. Nwabueze at pages 78 to 79 of his book, cited supra, where he stated as follows:“It is not intended to suggest that the union (between the President and Vice President) demands of the Vice that he should be a slave to the President, with no will or opinion of his own. It does not submerge his personality or individuality in that of the President or make them two-in-one …. As the President’s chief adviser, it is his prerogative and duty to discuss freely with him the policies and actions of the government, to point out any defects or errors in them, and the dangers to which they may expose the government. Nevertheless, having done this, the principle of collective responsibility binds him to all government decisions or actions, whether they emanated from the President alone or from the Executive Council. So long as he remains in office as Vice President, he is not free to oppose in public decisions or actions of the President or of the Executive Council, no matter that he personally disagrees with them. His freedom to disagree and to criticize can only be exercised privately in a meeting with the President alone or in the Executive Council. Freedom on the part of a Vice President to criticize his President publicly for mismanagement or corruption is certainly not consistent with the loyalty required of him as a member of the President’s team. It is worse still that a Vice President should make mismanagement or corruption by the President a reason for seeking openly to contest the office against him. Continued faith in the President should be the only reason for continuing to serve under him. More importantly, it is the only explanation for an interpretation of a Vice President’s continued stay that the electorate can grasp and identify with…”
The interpretation of Section 135 (1) of the Constitution would surely be different from the interpretation which has been given to Sections 180 subsections (1) & (2) of the Constitution by the Court in the celebrated case of Brig-Gen Mohammed Marwa vs. Admiral Murtala Nyako, that no Governor can take Oath of Allegiance and Oath of Office more than twice. This is because Sections 135 (1) and 180 (1)(b) of the Constitution are identical in all material particulars. It is necessary to reproduce Section 180 (1) of the Constitution which provides thus:
“(1) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, a person shall hold the office of Governor of a State until:-
(a) when his successor in office takes the oath of that office; or
(b) he dies whilst holding such office; or
(c) the date when his resignation from office takes effect; or
(d) he otherwise ceases to hold office in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution.
(2) Subject to the provisions of subsection (1) of this section, the Governor shall vacate his office at the expiration of a period of four years commencing from the date when -
(a) in the case of a person first elected as Governor under this Constitution, he took the Oath of Allegiance and Oath of Office; and
(b) the person last elected to that office took the Oath of Allegiance and Oath of Office or would, but for his death, have taken such oaths”.
The Supreme Court in interpreting and construing Section 180 (1) (b) of the Constitution in the case of Marawa vs Nyako (supra) held that tenure elongation under any guise is not envisaged by the framers of the Constitution. The Governors of Adamawa, Bayelsa, Cross River, Kogi and Sokoto States in the Marawa’s case had sought interpretation of when their tenure would start to run having taken Oath of Allegiance and Oath of Office twice after they won elections ordered by the Court arising from the nullification of previous ones won by them. The Supreme Court said that the Oaths after they won the elections ordered by the Court were a nullity. The proper oath is the one they first took even though the election was eventually cancelled by the Court it does not cancel the Oath taken. Onnoghen, JSC illuminated thus:
“The fact that there was an election in 2007 as a result of which the 1st respondents (Governors) took their Oaths of Allegiance and of Office are facts which cannot be wished away, just as the acts they performed while occupying the seat. The said governors may not have been de jure governors following the nullification of their elections, which is not supported by the acceptance of their acts in that office as legal and binding on all and sundry, they were certainly governors de facto during the period they operated ostensibly in accordance with the provisions of the constitution and Electoral Act and as such the period they so operated has to be taken into consideration in determining the terminal date of their tenure following, what I may call, their second missionary journey vide a re-run election particularly as the constitution unequivocally grants a tenure of four years to a person elected governor of a state calculated from the date he took the Oaths of Allegiance and of Office which was the 29th day of May, 2007. It is settled law that the time fixed by the constitution for the doing of anything cannot be extended. It is immutable, fixed like the rock of Gibraltar. It cannot be extended, elongated, expanded, or stretched beyond what it states. To calculate the tenure of office of the governors from the date of their second Oaths of Allegiance and of Office while ignoring the period from 29th May, 2007, when they took the first oaths is to extend the four years tenure constitutionally granted the governors to occupy and act in that office which would be unconstitutional. It is therefore clear and I hereby hold that the second Oaths of Allegiance and of Office taken in 2008, though necessary to enable them continue to function in that office, were clearly superfluous in the determination of the four years tenure under Section 180(2) of the 1999 Constitution.” Per ONNOGHEN, J.S.C (Pp. 64-65, paras. B-C).
It is clear as the crystal that Section 135 subsections (1) and (2) of the Constitution is identical (pari materia) with Section 180 subsections (1) and (2) of the Constitution. The truth of the matter is that President Jonathan has taken the Oath of Allegiance and Oath of Office twice. Jonathan took Oath on 6/5/2010. He took another Oath on 29/5/2011. If President Jonathan contests the Presidential Election in 2015 and he wins and is inaugurated by taking the Oath of Office and Oath of Allegiance on the 29th May, 2015, he would have taken such Oath of Office and Oath of Allegiance thrice. This will be contrary to the intention of the framers of Section 135 (1) (b) of the Constitution. It would also mean that President Jonathan would have been in office as President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria for Nine (9) years.
The apposite question will be: Does the Constitution contemplate that a President would be in office for more than eight (8) years?   The answer to the question is clearly in the negative.  The Constitution only contemplates that a President must be in office for eight years at most. The Constitution does not envisage tenure elongation under any guise or camouflage.  As soon as President Jonathan became President on the 6th May, 2010, he was deemed to have been first elected as President. There is no gain saying that President Jonathan had been elected twice. President Jonathan is therefore undoubtedly caught up by the provisions of Section 135 (1) (b) of the Constitution and the principle laid down by the Supreme Court in the Governors tenure elongation case.
Those (including CHIEF EDWIN Clark, a long standing lawyer) who have been insisting that President Jonathan should run for elections in 2015 should read the Constitution objectively and leave politics and sentiments out of it. It is well settled that politics and sentiments have no place in the interpretation of the Law. It is what the Law says not how it ought to be that counts. The Constitution does not contemplate that a President should enjoy an extra day outside his four year tenure. Jonathan has four year tenure, 2011-2015. Jonathan had served for one year before he took Oath on winning the 2011 election. If we add this one year together with four years of his present term, it means that at the end of his present tenure he would have been President for five years. Assuming Jonathan contest and wins in 2015, the implication is that he would be serving as President for nine years.
“It is settled law that the time fixed by the constitution for the doing of anything cannot be extended. It is immutable, fixed like the rock of Gibraltar. It cannot be extended, elongated, expanded, or stretched beyond what it states. To calculate the tenure of office of the governors from the date of their second oaths of Allegiance and of office while ignoring the period from 29th May, 2007, when they took the first oaths is to extend the four years tenure constitutionally granted the governors to occupy and act in that office which would be unconstitutional. It is therefore clear and I hereby hold that the second Oaths of Allegiance and of office taken in 2008, though necessary to enable them continue in office, were clearly superfluous in the determination of the four years tenure under Section 180 (2) of the 1999 Constitution”.
President Jonathan shall be enjoying tenure extension if he contest and wins the 2015 election because he would have stayed for nine years by the time that tenures expires by 2019. This will constitute a breach of Section 135 subsections 1, 2 & 3 of the Constitution.
This is more than the eight years prescribed for a President who has won election twice. It is unconstitutional and illegal for a President to be in office more than what is prescribed by the Constitution. The Constitution does not contemplate that a President will be in office more than eight years at most. There is no tenure elongation under any guise.  It is well settled that the Supreme Court except under extraordinary circumstances will never depart from the principle it has laid down in the governors’ case. Jonathan has obviously found himself in a legal quagmire which only the Court will unravel come 2015. Jonathan cannot have his cake and eat it. The only legacy he can leave is to carry out comprehensive and far reaching electoral reform to usher in a free, fair and transparent election in 2015.
He should shun the advice and advocacy of sycophants and ethnic champions such as Edwin Clark. When Clark is talking about Niger Delta or South/South he is only thinking about his Ijaw ethnic nationality!

DailyIndependent

Saturday, 10 August 2013

APC is Awo’s idea – Fasanmi


APC is Awo’s idea – Fasanmi

■  Says, the political master had always wanted a party of all progressives
Elder statesman and leader of the pan Yoruba Socio-cultural organization, Afenifere, Chief Ayo Fasanmi has declared that with the registration of the All Progressive Congress (APC) by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) justifies Chief Obafemi Awolowo’s quest for a party of progressives. The former senator also believes that the end will soon come for the reign of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) at the national level, saying that the new party would provide solution to the various problems confronting the nation. He spoke to BAMIGBOLAGBOLAGUNTE in Osogbo.
Excerpts:
The All Progressive Congress (APC) has just been registered. What is the hope of this new political party?
One day during the days of the late sage, the only political hero that Yorubas worship and that we shall continue to worship, Chief Jeremiah Obafemi Awolowo, we were at the leaders conference in his home town, Ikene, Ogun state and it was agreed that all progressive folks in the country must come together if this country must progress.
Today, we are doing similar thing. The progressive elements must come together to salvage this country from political marauders. That is the best way to take over the government of this country from the PDP.
As the largest country in Africa, everyone in this continent looks forward to seeing this country setting the pace for others and that can only take place when the progressives take over. Those who love this country should pray for APC to win elections in 2015. Those who prefer darkness to light are those who do not want APC in power, but we are so sure that the APC will rule this country from 2015, and no force will stop it. That is the only way to save Nigeria from destruction of the PDP.
I am happy that the leadership of the new political party (APC) is made up of men of integrity. They are principled men who cannot sell their conscience for a plate of porridge. Now that the party has been registered the revolution in the South West can also now happen in all parts of the country.

Do you think this new party has any hope to take over from the PDP?
With the present situation of things and with the efforts being put together by the leaders of this new party, the APC has hope and it is the only party that can send the PDP packing from Aso Rock. Let’s wait and see what will happen in 2015. I’m sure APC will, by the grace of God, take over from the PDP.

The Pan Yoruba Socio-Cultural organization, Afenifere, has been divided. What is the cause of the division and what are you doing to unite the organization in order to regain its lost recognition in the country?
The situation in Afenifere actually touches my heart. As a matter of fact, we all have to come together in the interest of the Yoruba nation. The major cause of the division in Afenifere is personal ambition. There is the Afenifere under the leadership of Reuben Fashoranti and there is also the Afenifere Renewal group under the leadership of Wale Oshun. The division in Afenifere occurred as a result of personal interest and ambition.
Fashoranti has been my friend for nearly 60 years now, Ayo Adebanjo is also a very good friend and most of the members of the Afenifere under Fashoranti are my very good friends and I wonder why we cannot come together. It is important for Yorubas to come together now for the interest of the Yoruba nation to be properly handled. The Afenifere Renewal Group is made of young, energetic Yorubas who are very active and I know most of them very well.
In those good old days, those who were chosen were young individuals. For instance, Matthew Mbu was a minister at a young age; Kola Balogun was just over 30 when he was made the minister and Gen Yakubu Gowon was equally young when he took over as Military Head of State. So, I have no doubt that these young men and women who are in the Afenifere Renewal Group will perform creditably with the advice and support of the elders. So, I am appealing to my colleagues on the either sides to come together.
Although, some of them are supporting the PDP, and of course Afenifere members can be in any political party, but we need to come together under one umbrella. The hero we worship in politics in Yoruba land, Chief Awolowo, will be happy in heaven if we all come together. Let us forget our differences and come together, so as for the spirit of Awolowo to bless all of us.

What will you identify as the cause(s) of the problems confronting the country?
The simple answer is leadership problem. The major cause of Nigeria’s problem is poor leadership. Once the leadership is corrupt and those at the top cannot do what is right, then there will be problem. Our leaders lack transparency and they are not ready to serve the people but they are in office to enrich themselves, they only want to pocket what is meant for the generality of the people.

Also, the presidential system of government, being practiced in the Country, cannot help us. We should also ask ourselves if truly we are operating a federal system of government. There are certain things the Federal Government should not look into if we are operating a true federal system of government. The Federal Government should only be concerned with the concurrent list. Must we continue to make police a federal agency in a federal system of government that we claim to operate and deny the states the opportunity to have their own police force? The system has to be re-examined. We take so much prominence on money in Nigeria and people don’t care where you get the money. This is too bad. What do you expect from a country that gives state pardon to a criminally-minded person? Honesty and dedication do not matter again in Nigeria. You will see people in Party ‘A’ today, tomorrow they are in Party ‘B’ because they want to make money.

This country has to be redeemed, especially at this crucial time when we want to mark our centenary anniversary. Also, the different ethnic
nationalities need to come together to address the problems of this country and think of ways to progress. The different ethnic groups should express their feelings and also chart a way forward.

Insecurity is a great challenge confronting the nation, what do you think was responsible for this and what is the solution?
The insecurity in this country has affected our economy as a nation because it has driven investors away from the country. Nigeria would have been better than this, economically, but for the problem of insecurity. Nigeria is a very beautiful country and we need to maintain our beauty and return to God as the prodigal son did.

How would you describe the administration of President Goodluck Jonathan?
Jonathan is not performing at all. He is just behaving like a lame duck. Look at what is happening in the PDP. The National Chairman of the Party does not agree with the party’s governors. Look at what is happening even in Ogun State where they have a former president.
Even in Adamawa State where Tukur hails from, there is problem. PDP cannot put its house in order and Jonathan cannot manage it. The President has not done anything for those involved in the petroleum subsidy scandal. Jonathan is a young man and I would have expected him to perform better. A man who became governor without any election should have performed better. Jonathan is more interested in his second term ambition than governance. His focus is in 2015 election and not in governance. He has just two more years to go. Jonathan will be shown the red card in 2015 and he should prepare to go now. He has less than two years to go and everyone will be glad when the APC takes over from him. What I can see is that Jonathan is on the way out.
Nigeria will be 100 years next year as a nation. As an elder
Statesman, how would you describe the journey so far?
We thank God for the journey of Nigeria from the date of its amalgamation to date. Nigeria has been a blessed nation but our leaders have been its major problem. The situation of things in the country in recent times calls for sober reflection by those who believe in Nigeria. If you look at various aspects of our national life, especially economy and politics, you will feel very much disappointed. Talk of education, employment, security, social infrastructures, they are all comatose.
The most worrisome of all the aspects of our national life is security. There is insecurity in the country, especially the northern part. Any leader or political party that cannot guarantee the security of the nationals is not fit to be in power. Our infrastructures have gone into ruins and our educational system is nothing to write home about. We many universities, over a hundred, but the education standard is falling by the day. The standard of education is very low now compared with what it used to be. Now, a graduate cannot speak or write correct English. If you ask a graduate of Accountancy to multiply seven by five, he would be silent for a long time before he gives a wrong answer.
However, with the development in the South West geopolitical zone by the coming on board of those I will describe as Political Daniels, one feel elated. I’m saying this, not because I am a member of the defunct Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), but because the governors in the South West are revolutionists who have come to give us hope and also tell us that the country still has hope. Look at what is happening in Lagos State. Anyone who gets to Lagos now will see the wonders Governor Babatunde Fashola is performing. The governors of Ogun, Oyo, Osun and Ekiti states are also doing similar thing. They are performing wonders and there is a wonderful transformation in these states, hence the need to commend them. One thing that gladdens my heart since the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) was funded is that there is no governor of the CAN that has been prosecuted by this anti-graft agency. This is because of their transparency and accountability.
What are your dreams and hopes for Nigeria?
My dreams for this country are to see a country that is united, where there is love, peace, unity and security. A country where there is no shedding of blood and a country where there is no corruption. I also pray to see a country where its leaders will serve the people with dedication, commitment and fear of God. My wish is to see a country where the wishes of the masses will be supreme to the wishes of the leaders.
What is your major desire now?
To thank God and seek the face of the Lord daily for His guidance. Also, my desire is to see a better Nigeria that will bring the dreams of the founding fathers to fulfillment.
TheSun


No Rift Between Buhari and Tinubu, APC Insists


2502N1.Asiwaju-Bola-Tinubu.jpg - 2502N1.Asiwaju-Bola-Tinubu.jpg

Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu

By Onyebuchi Ezigbo in Abuja                                          
The All Progressives Congress (APC) has said there are no ill-feelings between the two former leaders of the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) and Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), General Muhammadu Buhari and Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

Speaking in an interview with THISDAY,  the Interim national publicity secretary of APC, Alhaji Lai Muhammed, described stories about misunderstanding between Buhari and Tinubu as erroneous and mischievous.

Against the background of reports of a possible clash of interests among the leaders of APC, the party's spokesman said under the new dispensation everyone will be made to abide by the constitution of the party.

"The alleged frosty relationship between the two former leaders of CPC and ACN Senator Bola Ahmed Tinubu and General Muhammadu Buhari exists only in the imagination of the peddlers of the rumour. Absolutely, their relationship cannot be more cordial as it is at present, " he said.

Buhari's believed ambition to run for president is said to be at variance with an earlier understanding that he and the former Lagos State governor, regarded as principal promoters of the merger arrangement that gave birth to the APC, would forgo elective office in order to give the new party what an APC source called a "semblance of a new beginning".

It was reasoned that their quest for office could polarise the party. But Buhari a few days ago said he would abide by whatever decision the party takes with regard to his suspected presidential bid. “My decision will be tied to the constitution of the APC. If the party chooses me as its candidate, I will contest; if they do not consider me, I will not contest but I will still support the party.
"My decision to run for 2015 will solely be the party’s decision,” he said.

Despite the non-committal nature of Buhari's statement, it offers yet an implicit indication that he will run in 2015.
He offered a similarly vague response some months back when he said he would forgo his ambition to run for a record fourth time if a better candidate emerged in APC. “I am willing to step down if there is a formidable and better candidate than me. It is not about me but for the survival of the party.

"APC is about ensuring internal democracy, whoever emerges is the person I will support. Yes, I will be ready to step down,” he said in Minna at the maiden edition of the Sam Nda-Isaiah Annual Lecture Series.
But despite the apparent discomfiture the yet unconfirmed bid is stirring, there is no doubt that Buhari remains the candidate to beat in APC.

"Our earlier thinking was that the two leaders, (referring to Buhari and Tinubu should provide leadership for the new party and groom an acceptable candidate that will beat PDP’s Goodluck Jonathan, because from all indications, the PDP will present him," the source told THISDAY.

The APC spokesman dismissed the impression that the two opposition leaders are in disagreement, insisting that their relationship remained cordial and that the issue of who emerges the APC flag bearer has yet to be decided.

" They are euphoric, they speak to one another and they are working together but in the imagination of some people there is war, that is what they thrive on," he said.
On when the party will elect substantive leaders, Muhammed said the process will begin "with the mobilization and registration of members which will lead to congresses at the ward, local government and state levels culminating in the holding of a national convention where leaders of APC will emerge".

He said there will be no imposition of candidates or any short-cut for any aspirant in the contest.
According to Muhammed, contestants aspiring for positions in the party must be ready to go through the internal democratic structures of the party to emerge as a candidate.

"Clearly the issue of mobilization of membership and preparations for the governorship elections in Anambra state will be uppermost in the agenda of the party. Also the senatorial bye-election in Delta will be in the front  burner of discussions at the meetings of the party, " he added.
 
ThisDay

A country so corrupt it would be better to burn our aid money



Nigeria is not quite the most corrupt country on earth. But according to Transparency International, which monitors international financial corruption, it is not far off — coming a shameful 172nd worst among the 215 nations surveyed.

Only countries as dysfunctional, derelict and downright dangerous as Haiti or the Congo are more corrupt.

In theory, Nigeria’s 170 million-strong population should be prospering in a country that in recent years has launched four satellites into space and now has a burgeoning space programme.


Frankly, we might as well flush our cash away or burn it for all the good it's doing for ordinary Nigerians
Frankly, we might as well flush our cash away or burn it for all the good it's doing for ordinary Nigerians

Moreover, Nigeria is sitting on crude oil reserves estimated at 35 billion barrels (enough to fuel the entire world for more than a year), not to mention 100 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.

It also manages to pay its legislators the highest salaries in the world, with a basic wage of £122,000, nearly double what British MPs earn and many hundreds of times that of the country’s ordinary citizens.


The oil industry is highly corrupt, with 136 million barrels of crude oil worth $11¿billion (£7.79 billion) were illegally siphoned off in just two years from 2009 to 2011
The oil industry is highly corrupt, with 136 million barrels of crude oil worth $11¿billion (£7.79 billion) were illegally siphoned off in just two years from 2009 to 2011

No wonder the ruling elite can afford luxury homes in London or Paris, and top-end cars that, across West Africa, have led to the sobriquet ‘Wabenzi’, or people of the Mercedes-Benz.

Yet 70 per cent of Nigerians live below the poverty line of £1.29 a day, struggling with a failing infrastructure and chronic fuel shortages because of a lack of petrol refining capacity, even though their country produces more crude oil than Texas.

And that poverty is not for want of assistance from the wider world.


Poverty: Millions of Nigerians are living in poverty, despite the country earning huge profits from its oil deposits
70 per cent of Nigerians live below the poverty line of £1.29 a day, struggling with a failing infrastructure and chronic fuel shortages

Since gaining its independence in 1960, Nigeria has received  $400 billion (£257 billion) in aid —  six times what the U.S. pumped into reconstructing the whole of Western Europe after World War II.

Nigeria suffers from what economists call the ‘resource curse’ — the paradox that developing countries with an abundance of natural reserves tend to enjoy worse economic growth than countries without minerals and fuels.

The huge flow of oil wealth means the government does not rely on taxpayers for its income, so does not have to answer to the people — a situation that fosters rampant corruption and economic sclerosis because there is no investment in infrastructure as the country’s leaders cream off its wealth.


Nigerian police can be easily bribed to look the other way in a country where corruption in Nigeria is endemic
Nigerian police can often be easily bribed to look the other way in a country where corruption in Nigeria is endemic

Corruption in Nigeria is endemic — from parents bribing teachers to get hold of exam papers for their children through clerks handed ‘dash’ money to get round the country’s stifling bureaucracy to policemen taking money for turning a blind eye.

It is at its most blatant, perhaps, in the oil industry, where 136 million barrels of crude oil worth $11 billion (£7.79 billion) were illegally siphoned off in just two years from 2009 to 2011, while hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies were given to fuel merchants to deliver petrol that never materialised.

Whether the country is ruled by civilians or soldiers, who invariably proclaim their burning desire to eradicate civilian corruption, it makes absolutely no difference.


The huge flow of oil wealth means the government does not rely on taxpayers for its income, so does not have to answer to the people
The huge flow of oil wealth means the government does not rely on taxpayers for its income, so does not have to answer to the people

The military ruled Nigeria between 1966 and 1979 and from 1983 to 1999, but if anything, corruption was worse when they were in charge since they had a habit of killing anyone threatening to expose them.

It is estimated that since 1960, about $380 billion  (£245 billion) of government money has been stolen — almost the total sum Nigeria has received in foreign aid.

And that even when successive governments attempt to recover the stolen money, much of this is looted again.


President Sani Abacha, a military dictator who ruled in the Nineties, had accrued a staggering $4¿billion (£2.58¿billion) fortune by the time he died
President Sani Abacha, a military dictator who ruled in the Nineties, had accrued a staggering $4¿billion (£2.58¿billion) fortune by the time he died

In essence, 80 per cent of the country’s substantial oil revenues go to the government, which disburses cash to  individual governors and hundreds of their cronies, so  effectively these huge sums  remain in the hands of a  mere 1 per cent of the Nigerian population.

Political power is universally regarded as a chance to reap  the fortunes of office by the ruling elite and its families and tribes.

The most egregious example was President Sani Abacha, a military dictator who ruled in the Nineties and accrued a staggering $4 billion (£2.58 billion) fortune by the time he died of a heart attack while in bed with two Indian prostitutes at his palace in the nation’s capital, Abuja, in 1998. Abacha’s business associates did nicely, too — one of them deposited £122 million in a Jersey offshore account after selling Nigerian army trucks for five times their worth.

Public office is so lucrative that people will kill to get it. Nigeria has 36 state governors, 31 of whom are under federal investigation for corruption.

In one of the smallest states, a candidate for the governorship occupied by one Ayo Fayose received texts signed by the ‘Fayose M Squad’ — and it was clear the ‘M’ was for ‘Murder’ when they stabbed and bludgeoned a third candidate to death in his own bed.

By the end of its term of office, the British Government will have handed over £1 billion in aid to Nigeria.

Given the appalling levels of  corruption in that nation, this largesse is utterly sickening — for the money will only  be recycled into bank accounts in the Channel Islands or Switzerland.

Frankly, we might as well flush our cash away or burn it for all the good it’s doing for ordinary Nigerians.

MailOnLine

Friday, 9 August 2013

I do my talking on the pitch Cristiano Ronaldo replies Mourinho

 


RONALDOThe Portuguese striker, who scored two goals in Real Madrid’s 3-1 victory over Chelsea, says he has refused to let former boss Jose Mourinho’s comments affect his game
Real Madrid forward Cristiano Ronaldo has stressed that events taking place off the pitch do not affect him as he prefers to let his football do the talking for him.
Chelsea manager Jose Mourinho’s jibe earlier this week that the Portugal star is not ‘the real Ronaldo’ led to controversy ahead of Wednesday’s International Champions Cup final between both sides, but the 28-year-old has remained unperturbed by his former boss’ taunts.
Ronaldo already stated on Monday that Mourinho’s comments did not deserve a reply and remained calm again on Wednesday after helping Madrid to a 3-1 win over Chelsea with two goals.
“I do my talking on the pitch. Things that happen off of it do not affect me,” the Portugal international told reporters.
“I just aim to help Real Madrid to achieve its objectives and what happens away from there does not hurt me.”
Ronaldo then went on to discuss Madrid’s Champions League ambitions this season and stressed that they still have plenty to do before they can think about an historic 10th European crown.
He added: “There is a long way to go, we will try to do our best. We have a good team and the new players are very good and hopefully the Decima will come this year.”
GOAL.COM