Monday, 4 August 2014

Nigeria Would Be In Turmoil If Buhari And Sheikh Dan Bauchi Were Killed, Says President Jonathan

Muslim leaders greet President Goodluck Jonathan at the State House on SundayPresident Goodluck Jonathan said calamity would have befallen Nigeria if former Head of State, Muhammadu Buhari and Islamic scholar, Sheik Dahiru Bauchi, were killed in the July 23 bomb attacks in Kaduna. The two leaders survived the attacks that killed more than 40 people.
Speaking when a delegation of the Muslim community, led by Vice President Namadi Sambo, paid him Sallah homage at his official residence, in Abuja on Sunday, President Jonathan appealed to clerics in the country to preach peace and unity to their followers “and not the gospel of hate”, saying that the country could not develop without peace.
He said, “Not too long ago we had these dastardly attacks in Kano and Kaduna. We stand to condemn these acts of terror on our people.
“And, we extend our condolence and sympathy to the bereaved and those who might have been injured.
“The recent attacks in Kaduna, especially where Sheik Dahiru Bauchi and Gen. Muhammadu Buhari were targets are quite instructive.
“You can imagine if these two people had died in the attacks.
“Sheik Bauchi is one of our top Islamic preachers; he has millions of followers. Buhari, a former Head of State and leading political figure, has massive supporters.
“On the same day, people wanted to kill them‎; those who planned the attacks are clearly sons of the devil, because if they had killed these two people, we wouldn’t have been here today; this country would have been in turmoil.
”We couldn’t have gathered here to celebrate.”
Sallah Homage Visit To President Jonathan Led By Vice-President Namadi Sambo
Mr. Jonathan thanked God for saving their lives and preventing “a major calamity” that would have befallen the country.
The president restated that the Federal Government was doing everything possible to end the activities of Boko Haram and other terrorist groups in the country.
He used the opportunity to renew his call on Nigerians to continue to
work with government in that regard.
“Government is looking on how to raise funds; in fact, we are launching the fund on Thursday.
“This is to ensure that the widows, orphans, those whose business premises have been vandalised and even our worship places, mosques and churches, that have been destroyed, we will rebuild.
“Government alone cannot do it because we will need huge sums of money. The Nigerian private sector is vibrant and willing if they see sincerity in government.
“We have demonstrated that very clearly and we are hopeful that on that day, reasonable amount of money will be raised.
“And, we will continue to raise money until we are able to cushion the effect of these excesses and at the same time, we are strengthening our security services so that they will be able to confront this menace,” he said.
Mr. Jonathan said that he was honoured by the visit of the Muslim community after the Ramadan and prayed God to listen to and answer their prayers.
Earlier, Mr. Sambo commended the president for fasting with Muslims during the Ramadan, and for welcoming the delegation to his residence.
He prayed God to continue to give the president wisdom and guidance to lead the country to greater prosperity.
The vice president also prayed for peace in Nigeria and for Allah to bring all evil, including Boko Haram, to an end.
He urged Nigerians to be their brother’s keepers “for peace, tranquility, total reconciliation and stability to reign in the country.”
During the visit, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Bala Mohammed, paid homage to the president on behalf of Abuja residents.
He said; “We have always enjoyed humane and civil disposition that is why you see Muslims and Christians coming to pay homage in line with your exemplary leadership.
“We pray that Allah will grant you courage and wisdom to continue to steer the ship of leadership despite the current security challenges.”
(NAN)

REVEALED: Jonathan Presidency Begged Buhari To Settle Abati “Ungovernable” Slander Libel Suit Out of Court


obanikoro-buhari-dog
Aug. 4, 2014
jonathan begs buhariNewsRescue- Very few Nigerians know that it was a single evil mastermind, Jonathan’s media man, Reuben Abati that concocted the deadly slanderous accusation against the person of ex-head of state, General Muhammadu Buhari, that claimed he made statements of making “Nigeria ungovernable,” in the event he lost the 2011 presidential elections. Abati cooked up the viral lies in a Guardian publication captioned “For the attention of General Buhari” published in April of 2011.
Buhari took him to court and as can be read below, under begging from the Presidency, Buhari agreed to settle out-of-court and Abati and the Guardian he used to be managing editor for published a public apology to Buhari on  11th July 2013. But truth never spread like the slander; and despite the presidency begging Buhari, the other than Abati, all the other media ‘dogs’ of the presidency continued promoting the same slander. Rather shocking to realize this. NewsRescue has opened a $1000 challenge for whoever can provide where Buhari ever said anything about making Nigeria ungovernable in 2011, just to dig out the truth once and for all; because this will be very unfair to the person of Buhari that we continue to peddle this evil slander.
An article we missed that was in all major dailies:

Presidency begs Buhari to settle slander case out of court

rescuedThe presidency has begged former Head of States and national leader of Congress for Progressive Change (CPC), General Muhammadu Buhari (rtd) to settle out of court the libel suit he filed against the Special Adviser to the President on Media and Publicity, Dr Reuben Abati.
It would be recalled that Abati had on page 51 of the April 22, 2011, edition of The Guardian newspaper, written an article entitled “For the attention of General Buhari,” where he claimed that Buhari made an unguarded statement which stirred the post-election violence that almost tore the nation apart.
The former Military General however, regarded the publication as libellous, aimed at denting his hard earned name and image.
However, in a copy of the Terms of Settlement filed before a Lagos High Court in Ikeja, the ‘warring’ parties have agreed to settle the matter out of court.
According to the terms of settlement, dated December 2012 and filed before the administrative judge of Lagos State, Justice Opeyemi Oke, the claimant (Buhari), Mr. Tope Adebayo ( lawyer to Buhari), Abati and Mr. Kunle Sanyaolu (lawyer to The Guardian) signed the terms of settlement. But the lawyer to the first defendant (Abati), Dame Carol Ajie, refused to sign the document. The refusal may not be unconnected to the conditions and terms of the agreement.
It was gathered that the parties further agreed that Abati and The Guardian should retract and apologise to Buhari in certain form and contents.
“The claimant and defendants have agreed and resolved that the retraction and apology shall take the following form and contents: ‘Re: For the attention of General Buhari’- On April 22, 2011, The Guardian Newspaper published an article on Page 51 titled ‘For the attention of General Buhari’ where certain allegations were made against General Muhammadu Buhari (rtd), GCFR, concerning the 2011 election and General Buhari’s alleged role in the violence emanating from the elections.
“The publication was based on information which we believed to be reliable at that time. Since the publication, however, we now have reason to believe that certain parts of the story were not verified to be correct before the publication.
“We assure General Muhammadu Buhari (rtd), GCFR, of our highest esteem and regret any distress or embarrassment which the said publication may have caused him.
“The claimant and defendants agree that on the execution of these Terms of Settlement, the defendants are discharged from all or any liabilities or obligations arising from the said publication.”

Buhari obliged: The out of court settlement

GUARDIAN  Re: For the attention of General Buhari
Thursday, 11 July 2013 00:00 Editor
SIR: “On April 22, 2011, The Guardian Newspaper published an article on page 51 titled “For the attention of General Buhari” wherein certain allegations were made against General Muhammadu Buhari’s alleged role in the violence emanating from the elections.
The publication was based on information which we believed to be reliable at that time. Since the publication, however, we now have reason to believe that certain parts of the story were not verified to be correct before the publication.
We assure General Muhammadu Buhari (rtd) GCFR of our highest esteem and regret any distress or embarrassment which the said publication may have caused him.”

The Whole Truth about the “Ungovernable” comment

It was a PDP politician, Alhaji Lawal Kaita that said:
“The North is determined if it happens, to make Nigeria ‘ungovernable’ for President Jonathan or any other Southerner who finds his way to the seat of power on the platform of the PDP against the principle of the party’s zoning policy.”
“Ungovernable” came within the PDP and was related to PDp zoning issues. Makes sense? Now recollect what NSA Andrew Azazi revealed before he was killed and it all adds up.
AZAZI-PDP


As Ebola Virus Spreads Alarm, Former INEC Chairman, Maurice Iwu, Dusts Up Fraudulent Claims About Cure

Maurice IwuMaurice Iwu, the controversial former chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), has capitalized on the outbreak of deadly and incurable Ebola in West Africa to restate his scientifically unproven and dubious claim that he had found a cure for the virus in a drug synthesized from kola nut.
More than 600 people have died in several West African countries in what is seen as the most serious outbreak of the Ebola virus. The former INEC chair, a pharmacist by training and a former professor at the University of Nigeria, appears determined to exploit the growing alarm over the virus to renew unfounded claims that he had achieved a breakthrough in the treatment of Ebola. But Mr. Iwu has a long history of fraudulent claims.
In 2007, SaharaReporters had written a series of investigative reports exposing gaps in Mr. Iwu's academic and professional background. Our extensive investigative reports ran weeks before the then INEC chief oversaw the 2007 general elections that local and foreign observers described as one of the most fraudulent elections in any part of the world. Among other revelations, our investigative team discovered that Mr. Iwu had forged his bachelor’s degree from Cameroon and fraudulently used the certificate to obtain admission to Bradford University in the UK where he undertook graduate studies.
Following our expose, Mr. Iwu lied to a Nigerian online blogger that he had also received his bachelor’s degree from Bradford University, a claim the institution denied. In an email dated Monday, January 22, 2007, Oliver Tipper, who was then Senior Press Officer for Marketing and Communications at the University of Bradford, stated: “Iwu did not do an undergraduate degree at Bradford. He was enrolled here in 1975 for the Masters degree in Pharmacy, but we have on our records that he studied Pharmacy in Cameroon during the late 1960s before coming to Bradford.”
Since those revelations, Mr. Iwu has never addressed the inconsistencies and discrepancies in his academic profile. A source close to then President Olusegun Obasanjo told SaharaReporters that Mr. Obasanjo was fully aware of Mr. Iwu's fraudulent background. “Andy Uba recommended Professor Iwu to chair INEC, and President Obasanjo decided to choose him because of his questionable background. Chief Obasanjo knew it would be easy to blackmail Iwu to rig elections for candidates handpicked by Obasanjo and his cronies,” said the source. 
Those declared winners in the fraudulent 2007 elections included the sickly and now deceased former President Umaru Yar’Adua, and Mr. Andy Uba. The latter was rigged into office as the Governor of Anambra State, but was in office for a mere 17 days before the Supreme Court kicked him out in a ruling that drew nation-wide celebration. SaharaReporters had also written a series of investigative reports that exposed Mr. Uba’s fraudulent certificate claims. We revealed that Mr. Uba’s claims that he earned degrees from Concordia University in Canada, California State University in the US, and a so-called “Buxton University” in the UK were mere concoctions. 
On his part, Mr. Iwu has a history of deception, misrepresentation and dishonesty with regard to claiming pharmaceutical breakthroughs similar to the latest one about Crofelemer drug invention. At the 16th International Botanical Conference in 1999, Mr. Iwu made the startling announcement that he had found the cure for the dreaded Ebola virus. He claimed that the cure resulted from groundbreaking research carried out under the auspices of his non-profit outfit, BDCP. He told participants that Garcinia kola extract stopped the replication of the Ebola virus. Mr. Iwu followed his proclamation with a call for more funds. “Our limiting factor is funds,” he declared. “If we have a sponsor, we can do it in no time.” 
The battle cry got Mr. Iwu a lot of attention. Soon, he received millions of dollars to fund the development of his ostensible cure. BDCP’s financial earnings outlined in Form 990 and obtained by SaharaReporters in 2007 show that Mr. Iwu received grants and donations in the amount of $425,947 in 1999, $367,870 in 2001, $640,917 in 2002 and $980,771 in 2003—a total of more than $2.4 million. 
Mr. Iwu reported in the form that all the monies were spent for the purpose of “medical research on the use of African herb for medicine.” However, till date there appears no mention of further development of Garcinia kolaextract to cure Ebola or any significant discoveries beyond some patents, one of which was an “Alkaloids of Picralima Nitida used for treatment of Protozoal diseases” invented by Maurice Iwu et al., and assigned to the U.S. Secretary of the Army, Washington, D.C. The patent, designated 5,290,553, was issued March 1, 1994, before Mr. Iwu’s claims on Ebola research.
Interestingly, no U.S. or European pharmaceutical companies has shown any interest in following Mr. Iwu’s much-touted leads.
In the Form 990 tax documents submitted to the United States Government, Mr. Iwu and his partners deliberately failed to list names of their Board of Trustees. But in the Article of Amendment of Bioresources Development and Conservation Program—completed in November 1994—the body listed five members of the Board of Directors: Professor Maurice Iwu, Dr. Lisa Messerole, Cosmas N. Obialor, Thomas F. Tata, and Dr. Chris Okunji.   
Mr. Iwu's questionable lifestyle did not start in 1999. In another 2007 investigative report by SaharaReporters, our reporters unearthed how Mr. Iwu contrived to steal thousands of dollars from Citibank in the US.
According to official documents obtained by SaharaReporters from the Circuit Court of Montgomery, on August 10, 1992, Mr. Iwu’s son deposited a bank check drawn on the United States Treasury Department in the amount of $5,000 payable into his father’s Citibank checking account (Acct. number XXXX2549). Instead of crediting Mr. Iwu’s checking account with a $5,000 deposit, Citibank erroneously credited his account with a $50,000 deposit on August 11, 1992, an excess of $45,000. Mr. Iwu, who noticed the error on August 17, 1992, acted immediately to transfer the sum of $20,000 into his savings account on the same day. Three days later, on August 21, 1992, he transferred the remaining $25,000 out of the checking account into the same savings account. On the same day of August 21, 1992, Mr. Iwu withdrew $35,000 from his savings account and converted it into a cashier’s check that was then transferred to London through Chevy Chase Bank in Maryland to National Westminster Bank in London. The $35,000 was then transferred to Bioresources Development and Conservation Program (BDCP) in Nigeria “to pay for expense connected with the International Congress being hosted by BDCP.”   
According to BDCP financial statement prepared for the event and signed by Dr. Chris Okunji, the conference treasurer, the transferred amount of $35,000 was recorded in the document as “donations from overseas through Prof. Iwu”. 
Prior to traveling to Enugu for the conference, Mr. Iwu was approached by the bank to repay the excess amount credited to his account. He told the bank that he had completely spent the money because he thought that the money came from one of the grants he had applied for. This was before Mr. Iwu testified in court that he brought the overage to Citibank’s attention immediately he noticed it.
Before Mr. Iwu was dragged to court, he and Citibank had reached an agreement on a repayment plan both verbally and in writing. In a letter dated December 23, 1992 and addressed to Mr. Iwu, Mr. Ruppert, a vice president of Citibank, acknowledged Iwu’s initial payment of $5,000 and outlined the agreed repayment plan. The plan required Mr. Iwu to repay $10,000 in January, 1993 and the balance of $30,000 in March 1993. But Mr. Iwu stopped repaying and left for Enugu to facilitate his BDCP conference.
Upon returning from Enugu, Mr. Iwu was informed by Citibank of the lapses in payments. A letter by Mr. Ruppert dated March 18, 1993 stated in part: “on February 3, 1993 you called and left a voice mail message indicating that you had just arrived home from an overseas trip and you would not be able to make the $10,000 payment until the end of February 1993. To date we have not received this payment.” Mr. Ruppert continued: “your unwillingness to commit to a satisfactory repayment schedule implies to us that you do not intend to repay your debt.” 
A defiant Iwu reacted by refusing to repay as agreed. On March 29, 1993, he wrote to Mr. Ruppert that “I was never indebted to you and that this whole transaction arose because Citibank messed up my project account which I operated at the bank.” In the same letter, Mr. Iwu stated, “I have been away to Europe and Africa since December 18, 1992 on previously scheduled travel in connection with my work. I returned to the USA briefly in the first week of February and promptly informed you of my inability to make any payments to you by the end of February and that I was traveling. I discussed with you during the meeting, I will pay $5,000 on or about November 15, and make subsequent payments in February, May, September and December 1993. If, however, I receive a reimbursement from UNIDO (based on the request I have submitted) then I will pay the entire amount in full by March 1993.”
Mr. Iwu made additional payments that totaled up to $17,000 before being dragged to court by Citibank seeking reimbursement of the remaining $28,000. 
Following nearly two years of litigation, both parties reached a settlement agreement and mutual release on February 22, 1995 that mandated Mr. Iwu to repay the said amount. The details of the agreement stipulated that Mr. Iwu would make a first repayment to Citibank in the amount $4,000 no later than March 10, 1995, and then a second repayment of $4,000 on April 15, 1995. The remaining $20,000 owed was to be repaid through monthly automatic debits of $750 into a new checking account that the court ordered Mr. Iwu to open no later than March 10, 1995. The debits were said to begin March 10, 1995 to be fully repaid in May 1997. 
SaharaReporters could not ascertain whether the amount was eventually repaid. Our correspondent placed calls to Mr. Iwu's son, Samuel Iwu, but he never responded.
In a separate development, SaharaReporters discovered from official documents obtained from the District Court of Maryland for Montgomery County that on October 19, 1998, Mr. Iwu and Mr. Okunji, serving as president and treasurer respectively to the BDCP, received a $25,000 loan on behalf of Bioresources Development and Conservation Program Inc. from Riggs National Bank. Mr. Iwu, who acted as the personal guarantor for BDCP, failed to repay the loan within the stipulated time, again leading the bank to file a lawsuit. 
Interestingly, on December 4, 2006, Mr. Iwu’s son, Samuel, presented a cashier’s check drawn on Chevy Chase Bank in Bethesda, Maryland in the amount $25,619.08 for repayment of the loan. It is curious that the loan was suddenly repaid after Mr. Iwu assumed office as chairman of INEC, raising questions about the source of the funds. 
Following the scandal of his term as INEC chairman, Mr. Iwu has sought every opportunity to shore up his battered image. One of his strategies appears to be to inflate or fabricate his role in developing new drugs for diseases, especially one as deadly and alarming as Ebola virus.
He has also tried to portray himself as a devout Christian. At the end of his tenure at the commission, Mr. Iwu had become so rich that he singlehandedly built and donated Saint Michael’s Catholic Church in Umakabia in Ehime Mbano Local Government Area of Imo State. The huge cost of the cathedral provoked condemnation of church officials who enthusiastically accepted the “gift” without asking how Mr. Iwu made the money. 
A professor of pharmacy told SaharaReporters that Mr. Iwu’s attempt to claim that he knows of a cure for Ebola was “a highly unusual practice.” He added: “Professor Iwu ought to know that before announcing that a drug can cure a disease, the drug should have gone through series of tests and lab trials, in this case, Prof. Iwu’s claims has not been through any test since he made a public claim about his so-called discovery in the 90s.”

WAS IT WRONG BUT NOW RIGHT?

Dateline 2012:
EVENT: The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) under the leadership of Sanusi Lamido Sanusi donated 125 million naira to VICTIMS OF "Boko Haram" ATTACKS in Kano and Abuja!
REACTIONS: All manner of insults and accusations of wastages of public funds and bias were levelled against Sanusi Lamido Sanusi!
TAKE A LITTLE REVERSE MOTION
Dateline 2011:
EVENT: The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) under the leadership of Sanusi Lamido Sanusi donated 500 million naira to the University of Benin to boost research and development!
REACTIONS: No noise! No accusations or insults of any kind against Sanusi Lamido Sanusi!
MY THINKING? Donate that side, and receive insults. But donate this side, and receive applause.
FAST FORWARD TO THE FUTURE
Dateline 2014
EVENT: The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) under the leadership of Sanusi Lamido Sanusi accuses the managers of Nigeria's public oil industry of not accounting for 20 billion dollars in 2013!
REACTIONS: Overwhelming support from the media and the discerning public, but insults and all manner of absurd accusations from thieves in high places and their supporters. Even godfathers of "Boko Haram" accused him of being among sponsors of "Boko Haram" as they always do to anyone who disagrees with their evil empire, particularly if the person is a Muslim, for it seems there is an open book with a list in which your name will be added as among the sponsors of terrorism once you are a Muslim and you criticise their corruption and brigandage!
Finally, the consumers of the stolen 20 billion dollars pushed him out of office, and even accused him of WASTEFUL DONATIONS with public funds!
Dateline June 2014:
EVENT: New Central Bank Governor, Mr. Godwin Emefiele assumes office!
Dateline Thursday, July 31, 2014:
EVENT: Just TWO MONTHS in office the new Central Bank Governor donates 15 billion naira to victims of "Boko Haram" attacks at a fund raiser organised by the country's President!
REACTIONS: Nothing! No insults and accusations of WASTEFUL DONATIONS!
SUMMARY: The Central Bank of Nigeria law permits the CBN to make donations of any sum within its ability at any time it deemed fit and necessary.
What's my point?
Well, we have double standards of accusing and judging people in Nigeria. We often deploy the narrow prism of ethnicity or religion in judging the same actions committed by our fellow Nigerians who are from a different tribe, region or religion, and that's why I have consistently said we are just a bunch of hypocrites!
It was wrong! It is right!
Hypocrites!
BUT MY MAJOR POINT IS THIS:
It is just not enough to keep pretending that you care about "victims of terrorism" so much that you hypocritically organise a fund raiser for them while behind the scenes you keep doing all you can to bomb and destroy all the towns and villages in a particular region for some morbid and selfish political calculation!
On the night of the so called fund raiser for "victims of terrorism" the town of Buni-Yadi in Yobe State, north-east Nigeria, was sacked by "Boko Haram"! Yes, the same town wherein soldiers vanished one night and "Boko Haram" came and destroyed a college and killed 58 students in February this year!
Remember that till date no soldier has been queried or punished for mysteriously vanishing from duty for "Boko Haram" to come and destroy that college and murder those 58 schoolboys!
We know the capability of the Nigerian armed forces, and, unless they are genuinely deployed to crush this fraud called "Boko Haram", every so called fund raiser for victims of a so called Boko Haram will just be mere distraction and deception to divert public attention from the financiers and promoters of the killing machine!
Hypocrites!

Jonathan’s Choice: Disintegration, Resignation or Death - Dr. Brimah

  1. Jonathan-hands-head 


    A different decision has to be made and it has to be made now. We must weigh our practical choices.

    Why do we have these available choices? It is the submission of Nigeria’s president. In the presidency’s words, as conveyed by him and all his spokesmen and ministers, certain elements who wish to make the nation ungovernable for him are behind Boko Haram terror. In essence, the president of the federal republic of Nigeria submits that BOKO HARAM IS A POLITICAL ASPIRATIONAL ORGANIZATION. It is important to highlight this line. Please refer – the recent submission by the minister of information that ‘Boko Haram terror activities coincide with political events.’ [Ref:http://www.vanguardngr.com/2014/07/terror-attacks-timed-frustrate-jonathan-fg/ ] This means, the motive and impetus of Boko Haram, according to the presidency, is not religious, territorial or poverty related, but political. This is FACT 1.

    I wrote earlier, in fact four months ago to be precise, that ‘now that Nigeria is ungovernable, what next?’ [Ref: http://ends.ng/?p=679] If it was true then, then we have veered off the edge now and are in free fall. With Boko Haram being a political organization as Jonathan adamantly posits, Jonathan bears the candy that the terrorists are chasing after. And as they chase after him they have been shooting at and killing us all one-by-one, pursuing Jonathan for the candy in his hand. This can clearly not go on any longer without us deciding that it is time to review the options.

    The images of my colleagues, students and graduates blown to bits in Kano Wednesday, hit a home run in my mind and I am sure, the minds of all Nigerians. This cannot remain the future of our next generation – being blown to bits by suicide bombers or used ad remote controlled bomb couriers. The same effect swarmed us when we witnessed the failed assassination attempt on Gen. Buhari that left 100 of us torn dead or torn crippled. Majority of us Nigerians do not have bomb-proof vehicles as do the fortunate cabal and it is us who die in this sick game.

    The obvious reality is that Nigeria is a deadly mess and has failed. If you disagree, take a look at the faces of the boys and girls whose friends died or whose limbs were torn off in the recent bombing and answer that question again.

    Quite clearly, terrorism and insurgency is not unique to Nigeria. But addressing it demands consideration of all decisions, sweet or sour that it may force upon us.

    There is no question that the Jonathan government cannot address this insecurity problem.

    The Jonathan government has failed to address and curb the terror crises for five straight years of governance.

    The Jonathan government cannot, has not been able to and will not arrest and sentence the political sponsors it accuses of being behind this terror. This is FACT 2. Relating this to FACT 1, we realize from FACT 1 that the Jonathan government’s available approach in ending this terror and what the administration has as top priority on its security table, is Boko Haram as a political organization. And if Boko Haram is a political organization as the Jonathan administration understands, and its aim is to replace President Jonathan with its own candidates, the ONLY WAY to address it totally and completely from the root will be to apprehend these political maniacs. Will Jonathan ever do so? No! So since he will not, it automatically means that so long as we choose to keep Jonathan, we choose to keep DEATH. It is important we recognize our choices and how we make/made them. This is FACT 3.

    At this juncture, it is important to acknowledge that Nigeria is a complex nation with strong political and ethnic interests. This cannot be put aside. Jonathan is up against a lot. If Jonathan proposes an amnesty for terrorists, one group will crucify him, if he does not, another will. If Jonathan goes hard on Boko Haram, the northern elders in the past have declared fire and brimstone – that ‘Jonathan has waged war on the north.’ These are our realities. In cognizance of this, for Jonathan to possibly defeat Boko Haram, he either needs to develop “balls” as FFK condemned him of not having and do what he must once and for all or he must allow a northern administration over the north, with either True Federal rule or DISINTEGRATION. This is FACT 4. Jonathan in particular, unlike some other president’s we have had who had balls and respect and influence across geo-politico-ethnic lines, cannot administer over northern Nigeria in general, which he clearly demonstrates disconnection from, and the Boko Haram security challenge in particular. If we continue to keep Jonathan in power over the genocidal crises impacting the north, we choose DEATH. Taking a look over our border at Cameroon, we see how the PM, Paul Biya immediately rose to the Boko Haram challenge with a spine. His gendarmes rescued the kidnapped deputy PM’s wife in a matter of hours and more importantly to show he understood the seriousness of an intact, responsible army, he publicly announced (on radio) the immediate dismissal of two of the nation’s top army officers. Jonathan will never do this. So FACT 4 is that we either Disintegrate or choose death because Jonathan cannot rule the north and southwest of Nigeria. With Jonathan, the polity is in flames, the perfect climate for insecurity and death.

    Based on the above considerations, a choice must be made. And the choice is Jonathan’s to make. Else, we continue to die.

    The choice is Jonathan’s to make and he has to make it fast. He either decides to resign and hands over to a care-taker interim administration constituted from all interest groups in Nigeria, market women, college professors, students, activists, traditional and religious leaders and the like, who will immediately take over administration as a crude parliament and determine the future of the nation(s).

    Or, he immediately embarks on a soft or hard disintegration of Nigeria to allow a regional approach to regional crises.

    Or he continues in his current line of choice, which is choosing DEATH for the people of Nigeria in the face of the realities and Facts considered above which he is confounded with and agreed, he cannot resolve.

    I do not see any other choice in this matter, other than keeping on folding our arms, praying and waiting for more of our loved ones to die. It is time that hard new choice is made; we can no longer bear this current choice of death.

    Dr. Peregrino Brimah

Now That Nigeria Is Ungovernable What Next?

Nigeria-pirates
Prelude
In 2002, when INEC denied the registration of some new political parties, late Gani Fawehinmi of the Conscience Party of Nigeria is quoted to have said, “We will make Nigeria ungovernable.” INEC budged and his Party got registered. [DailyChampion] It was one of the first popular instances of the use of the “ungovernable” threat.
The Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) in 2011 categorically denied that any of its members ever said they would make Nigeria ungovernable.
‘Usual suspect’ General Muhammadu Buhari’s lawyers threatened to sue the President of Nigeria’s spokesperson, Reuben Abati in a letter sent on the 11th of July, 2011 for “inventing libelous” allegations against the person of the ex-President, accusing him of instigating post-election violence. The letter was sent on behalf of General Buhari by Harrison Ogalagu for his lawyer, Tope Adebayo. The accusations had been made against him in Rueben’s Guardian newspaper publication. [See: Post Election Violence: Buhari Threatens To Sue Reuben Abati For Libel; SaharaReporters, Jul, 17 2011]
The one threat attached to Buhari was his prediction that if the rigging of 2011 repeated itself in 2015, there will be violence in the nation, ala, “the dog and baboon will be soaked in the same blood,” a crude translation of “kare Jini Biri Jini.” The northern governors stood by this warning. [2015: North’s governors back Buhari’s warning; TheNationOnline, May, 18, 2012]
A more accurate interpretation of the Hausa adage is: In the hunting game both the hunt dog and the hunted monkey will be in blood.
Update: Buhari did sue Abati and the Guardian and in an out of court settlement, a retraction was published in the Guardian of July 2013
GUARDIAN  Re: For the attention of General Buhari
Thursday, 11 July 2013 00:00 Editor
SIR: “On April 22, 2011, The Guardian Newspaper published an article on page 51 titled “For the attention of General Buhari” wherein certain allegations were made against General Muhammadu Buhari’s alleged role in the violence emanating from the elections.
The publication was based on information which we believed to be reliable at that time. Since the publication, however, we now have reason to believe that certain parts of the story were not verified to be correct before the publication.
We assure General Muhammadu Buhari (rtd) GCFR of our highest esteem and regret any distress or embarrassment which the said publication may have caused him.”
In my opinion, there has been no credible link of the person of Buhari to actionable threats relating to the current state of violence.
After a tiresome, fruitless internet search with no results, I found this question had been asked in April, 2013, on the popular Nigerian forum, Nairaland: ‘“Nigeria Will Be Made Ungovernable” – Who Said It?’ There were only three results in the thread. Two were linked; the first being that of Atiku Abubakar, who was discussing PDP zoning and challenging the PDP presidential primaries system at the time, and was quoted in December 2010 to have referenced a verse from late US President John F Kennedy, “Those who make peaceful change impossible will make violent change inevitable,” and the second was made by an Atiku associate, Alhaji Lawal Kaita, who is quoted to have said, “The North is determined if it happens, to make Nigeria ‘ungovernable’ for President Jonathan or any other Southerner who finds his way to the seat of power on the platform of the PDP against the principle of the party’s zoning policy.”
Malam Adamu Ciroma, 80, also PDP is the third reported to have towed the path and made headlines for recommending the impeachment of acting President Goodluck Jonathan.
In conclusion, from my investigation, it’s pretty much these three northerners that can be cited to have suggested making Nigeria ungovernable, and their statements were in reference to the PDP zoning system which according to them ‘should’ have delivered a northern party contestant to complete late Yar’Adua’s term. Are these the trouble makers and those behind the unrest from the north to the south of the nation? Is it of these three that the crisis Nigeria has faced owes its establishment?
What has the government done in regards to the much referenced threat/excuse that can only be found in these few instances, toward ensuring national sanity, peace and security? If there is any credible link of the few who are believed to have made statements that can and have been associated with political related terror, is it not the responsibility of the government to thoroughly quarantine such suspects? Is it not criminally irresponsible for the government to neither act nor assure the public that no action is necessary, these are not the culprits; than ’benefit’ from a nation in this and all other terror-related instances where the people dying daily believe terror sponsors are the government and their friends and above the law? Why has this government not arrested a single political terror sponsor? Why did killed Gen. Andrew Azazi accuse the PDP party of being responsible for the terror? What was done about that? What is the security department and the NSA doing? This are/were necessary questions… but now is it already too late for this government?
nigeria at war
Nigeria is Ungovernable
CORRUPTION: The nation’s treasury is wide open to administrative thieves; stealing at least a billion of whichever currency they savor every day, 365 days a year. Nigeria is corruption capital of the world. There is no harnessing this anymore. Today, the economy is being run as a dip-in and plunder all you can buffet. Confirming the ungovernability of the nation, there hasn’t been a single arrest of any top government looter despite the unprecedented level of theft of the commonwealth. The government is incapable of making such arrests.
DEFENSE: The defense department recently visibly joined the sequelae of things out-of-control, as the appointment of a new Minister of defense in the person of Lt. Gen Aliyu Mohammed Gusau (rtd) from the previous dictator regimes met stiff ‘opposition and rejection’ at the military level. The Chief of defense staff, rightly in abidance with the constitution, challenged the assumed authority of the President’s chosen Minister, a recycled NSA who was at the head of security affairs of the nation when all forms of terrorism evolved and successfully gained grip of the country. There is no possibility of reconciliation of this quagmire. Military functions on a strict code of respect and authority. Gusau is the minister, but he has been publicly stripped of all respect and authority. Pushed to the wall, the Minister who was chosen to supposedly assist in addressing the terror spate and ‘help win votes,’ was described to have thrown a major puerile tantrum.
DEVELOPMENT: With the degree of looting of the nation’s wealth, development eludes Nigeria. Privatization is the only activity of the government, but many question the credibility and capacity of this government to privatize; describing all privatization events as simply further looting opportunities. People are asking why the Presidency itself is not privatized, if they are so incapable of doing anything. Development is also impossible with stark poverty and the state of insecurity. Only the rich appear to be developing while the poor get poorer, more angry and easy to recruit into terror and criminality. This is why Boko Haram easily takes foot in the northeast and why kidnapping, a most lucrative ‘profession,’ is an official career in the South. The billion dollar MEND Amnesty programme trained youth have pretty much mostly resorted to either of the more promising ventures: kidnapping, oil bunkering, high sea piracy or armed robbery. In the Boko Haram plagued north, the years of unending terror with the state of emergency, curfews, the fear and deaths have virtually stalled all activity and rewound the hands of the clock. With the middle class wiped out, the rich are now so stupendously wealthy; they all have private jets and move secured in bomb-proof vehicles, miles apart from the poor. The poor are quite like domestic chickens in the yard, dispensable, valueless, their deaths in the prevalent climate of terror, no longer even recorded. Terror is a problem of the poor. But with this situation, development does not exist because there is no meaningful development in a state consummate insecurity.
So What Next?
Desperate politics and misbegotten tribalism pervades and drowns all logical conversation. Every single discussion on the pressing issues, the state of anarchy, the thousands of deaths, the hopelessness, the corruption, the rapaciousness of those in power. Virtually every attempt to analyze and address the critical state of desperation in Nigeria is thwarted fanatically by political activists, many of whom appear as though paid and employed to obscure and discombobulate. There is also an effort to force religious suspiciousness into the mix, though this has largely failed.
Accepted that Nigeria is now ungovernable, and the President is either eating peanuts and being a family man or preoccupied ‘campaigning’ for re-election, what do we do now? What is the end point or new beginning after those who promised it, or those who professed it to actualization have made Nigeria ungovernable so?
We were warned either in actuality or by our repeated unfounded attributions; either way, we all have heard and overheard that ‘Nigeria will be ungovernable.’ Well, now it is. What did we plan to do if and when it became so?
It is interesting and painful to realize that Gen. Buhari warned that Nigeria was already almost ungovernable in 2011 in his post election statement. A necessary read: Statement Of General Muhammadu Buhari Regarding The Verdict Of The Supreme Court On Jonathan’s ElectionSaharaReporters, Dec. 28, 2011. To think we were already at the nadir, it is a miracle we balanced this long. Those of us still alive, that is. But our less fortunate brothers and sisters, fathers and mothers and our children are now dying too fast, we cannot afford to balance in this blood any longer.
I have pondered this and will briefly summarize my suggestions as I leave it open for us all to decide what we do now that Nigeria has been certified ungovernable for most of the past 3 years.
Can we divide ourselves into regions? Seven, ten or more as needed. Those who wish can take/keep the President and perhaps the oil Minister as their Premiere and deputy respectively. A good leader might have saved Nigeria from this critical need to regionalize in the interest of safety, sanity and mutual respect, but we did not get that in 2011; ethnocentrism and the ‘fear of the north,’ made us choose this last straw and diehard mentee of the morbidly corrupt and inept dictators who got us here. We are yet unready, it appears to put all tribalism and paranoia aside, along with the old lizards and for our youth to step up, select people upon whom the future can have hope and work with these to forge a path of progress. Perhaps a leader like Madam due process, Obiageli Ezekwesili, who I am currently inclined to support for 2015, or someone you suggest might avert this need. But as unfortunately, the negative effects of $20-127 billion on-the-loose will not allow us see eye-to-eye, is it not time we rescue this ungoverned and ungovernable nation with true Federalism (with the possibility of later smooth disintegration as decided by the people)?
Let each region keep 90% of their resource earnings. The oil money has done nothing for my region. In fact I hate oil. I and my brothers and cousins will be happy if you keep the oil. We have a poverty level of 80% right now, 30 digits below Chad and Mali. Everywhere I turn I see poverty around me. People who really have no shoes, no story; they walk bare-foot or in tattered rubber flip-flop slippers. Without oil, we cannot really get much worse can we? But perhaps we can get better. My brothers in oily regions need a break where they can assert as much influence on the ownership of the wells and the commodity as they endure the ownership of the pollution and toxicity that has rendered their land worthless and their water cancerous. Like most of the governments before it, this government just does not care. Hopefully, each region can sort itself out and create hope and opportunity for the millions of hopeless and jobless youth, while also being able to at last control and ensure the security, safety and sanctity of life for itself, by itself. No more blaming others or pointing fingers at the top.
At the top, shall we make this a Parliamentary system and have a Prime minister? Hey, perhaps we can retain the current President as a ceremonial President under that re-established Parliamentary system and all his remaining 49,871 fans including Wendell Simlin will be delighted?
It is past time for a serious conversation, no holds barred. Nigeria is ungovernable. What next?
Dr. Peregrino Brimah