Friday, 19 March 2021

Cancelling Diaspora Nigerians?

 

By  Segun Gbadegesin

 

Mobility is a natural feature that human beings share with animals. Our hunting and food-gathering ancestors didn’t have a settled living experience and, therefore, no attachment to a particular place. Home was wherever they found tools for survival, including food and shelter. With the discovery of farming, a semi-permanent living experience began and settled family life and the joy of community overcame the travails of solitude. With language and culture in the mix, a genuine sense of place developed.

Generational memories of common history, common struggles and achievements, and particularly, a sense of common identity, soon facilitated the transmission of communal values to younger members. With the success of cultural immersion and value transmission, individuals feel a sense of attachment that make it impossible to abandon their homeland even when they feel comfortable in a new place. This explains why diaspora communities in modern nations severally and collectively have a sense of obligation to their homeland and to the wellbeing of the family members left behind.

Think of Jewish exiles in Babylon as recorded in Psalm 137. And Prophet Nehemiah’s clarion call to his people, “Come, let us build the walls of Jerusalem, that we may no longer suffer disgrace”, typifies the anguish of diaspora communities about the embarrassment of a homeland in ruins. The Jewish Diaspora has been particularly unique and effective. With the horrific history of antisemitism that led to one of the outrageous horrors in human history, Jewish people everywhere, especially in the Anglo-American orbit, use their influence and access to benefit the state of Israel. And the Israeli government and people understand and appreciate the passion and consequential help of its diaspora.

The Middle Passage is just as terribly horrendous. The mindset of the perpetrators in both is hateful and the effect continues to be felt. With a common background of community, there is good reason for the African Diaspora to be as nostalgic and therefore as passionate and as effective on behalf of the African homeland. However, despite the laudable efforts of Pan-African pioneers like W. E. B. Du Bois, it is not until very recently that Africa has made the necessary effort to embrace her diaspora community. On the national level, Ghana has been a trail blazer in attracting African-American brothers and sisters back to the homeland, with Stevie Wonder as the latest to announce the move.

With the establishment of the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission (NIDCOM), Nigeria appeared to come on board in recognition of her diaspora community. The Act provides “for the engagement of Nigerians in Diaspora in the policies, projects and participation in the development of Nigeria and for the purpose of utilizing human capital and material resources of Nigerians in Diaspora towards the overall socio-economic, cultural and political development of Nigeria and for related matters.”

The purpose of the Commission couldn’t be clearer. The government has finally recognized the importance of harnessing the patriotic zeal of fellow Nigerians living outside the borders. They will be engaged in policies and projects and they will be encouraged to participate in the development of the country. No limit is indicated on the purpose of the Commission. It is inclusive of individuals, groups, professionals, and communities.

To its credit, the Commission has been a tireless promoter of Diaspora communities around the world. The Chairperson, Hon. Abike Dabiri, has been effective in leading the charge for the mobilization of the energy of Nigerians in the Diaspora, and channeling the resources of the Commission in cases that need attention.

Beside the government initiative, political parties of different orientations also acknowledge the potentials of the diaspora by establishing their branches in major foreign countries. Key members of the ruling party have made promises of electoral participation by the Nigerian diaspora.

On its part, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has paid close attention to the indispensability of diaspora remittances to the financial health of the nation. As PwC observes in a recent release, Nigeria accounts for more than one-third of remittances that flow into sub-Saharan Africa, with more than $23 billion in 2018 alone, accounting for 83% of the Federal Government budget that year, and 11 times over the amount of Foreign Direct Investment into the country. These remittances flow from individuals and groups to families and communities they left behind but don’t forget.

ADVERTISEMENT

Diaspora Nigerians also don’t forget the trauma of failed policies and insecurities that they experienced before they relocated, and from time to time they make their voices heard through messages, opinion articles, rallies and protests in their various locations, and direct contact with foreign governments and, yes, the United Nations. The Nigerian Diaspora played a vital role in the dark days of military dictatorship and their contribution to the return of civil rule cannot be wished away.

This aspect of the relationship of the Nigerian Diaspora to the homeland, this unrelenting engagement with polices and projects which NIDCOM Act so unambiguously invites, this incessant pursuit of good governance, this unabashed commitment to struggling for government’s respect for the humanity of citizens, is not always appreciated by the powers at the helm of national affairs. But Nigerians in Diaspora, having a sense of obligation to their kith and kin, have no apology for raising these issues and demanding accountability from government. If they can contribute financially, they must contribute ideas. And clash of ideals and conflict of practices are inevitable.

The latest such clash just occurred in an embarrassing videotaped encounter between an honorable member of the House of Representatives and the Deputy Speaker of the House.

Hon. Mark Gbillah representing Gwer East/Gwer West Federal Constituency of Benue State had sought permission to present a petition by Mzough U Tiv Amerika (MUTA). The petitioners are a Nigerian group based in the United States and are concerned about the security situation in their homeland.

As soon as Hon. Gbillah mentioned America along with MUTA, the organization’s name, the Deputy Speaker, Hon. Ahmed Idris Wase went on the attack. “Did you say Tivs in America? What do they know about Nigeria? What is their business? They can’t sit in their comfort zones and know what is happening in Nigeria?” as reported by People’s Gazette on March 14, 2021. These statements are also captured in the video image that accompanied the report.

Really? How does one even begin to comment on this position of a highly placed officer of the People’s House? Even when Hon. Gbillah tried to explain why Nigerians in Diaspora have good reasons to be concerned about the homeland and “should be able to file complaints because they have families residing in the state”, noting the government’s investment in the NIDCOM, Deputy Speaker Wase won’t budge. For him the functions of the Commission are “nothing relevant” to the petition and therefore can’t be taken. This is despite the clear relevance of the petition to the purpose spelled out in the Act establishing NIDCOM as stated above.

Perhaps, it is a partisan matter or a personality issue between Hon. Gbillah and Hon. Wase. Whatever it is does not justify this incomprehensible position on the part of the Deputy Speaker.

More troubling, however, was that not a single member of the House rose in defence of the rights of Nigerian Diaspora community. Not one uttered a word on behalf of reason. Yet, many members, including NASS leadership, moved back from their diaspora locations to vie for the positions they now hold. Do they forget so soon? Many of the House members are also aware of the role that Diaspora Nigerians played and continue to play in the political development of the country, since the days of the nationalist struggles for independence.

Whatever the urge is for partisan bickering and mutual disrespect, some issues are more important and must be kept outside partisan rancor. Foremost among this is the commitment to security which is the basic function of government. Next is respect for the right and obligation of citizens wherever they reside to express their views about the functioning of government and its agencies. Diaspora Nigerian communities are equal stakeholders in Project Nigeria. Canceling them portends a grave danger to that project.

Russian President, Putin responds after Biden called him a ‘killer’


Russian President Vladimir Putin has responded after U.S. President, Joe Biden called him a “killer” and promised that Moscow would “pay the price” for interfering in the 2020 US elections in favour of his opponent, Donald Trump.

Speaking on Thursday, Putin said he wished Biden well, but suggested that the US leader may be projecting; also noting that evaluating other countries “is like looking in a mirror.”

“When I was a kid, when we were arguing with each other in the playground, we used to say, ‘Whatever you say [about others] is what you are yourself,’” Putin added.

On Wednesday, Biden was asked by ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos whether he thought Putin was “a killer,” and replied in the affirmative. He also noted that he had warned the Russian president that Washington would react strongly if it discovered evidence of interference in the 2020 presidential election.

Later that day, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki refused to clarify whether Biden’s statement was a metaphor.
In response, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov described Biden’s statement as “very bad,” accusing the White House of not being serious about “establishing a relationship” with Moscow.

Earlier this week, a joint report by Washington’s spy agencies alleged that Moscow had run a campaign to “denigrate” Biden’s reputation during the US presidential election. This accusation has been denied by the Kremlin.

Biden’s latest statements represent a major escalation in the already deteriorating relationship between Russia and the US. On Wednesday evening, Moscow recalled its ambassador in Washington, Anatoly Antonov, to discuss the Kremlin’s next steps.


I Lied Against Gov Ortom, I’m Sorry — Oshiomhole


Published

  

on

 

Former National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Comrade Adams Oshiomhole, today retracted the comments he made on Governor Samuel Ortom, on 27th July, 2018.

NEWS DIRECT reports that the retraction has been published in national newspapers today, 18th March, 2021.
These include The Nation, full page, on page 29, Thisday and Vanguard, half pages on 41 and 7 respectively.

Below is the retraction:

RETRACTION OF PUBLICATION

On the 27th day of July, 2018 at the National Headquarters of the All Progressives Congress (APC) and particularly in my capacity then as the Chairman of the Party, I addressed different national issues as well as some events which occurred in Benue State, including the movement earlier that day of his Excellency, Dr. Samuel Ortom (Executive Governor of Benue State) from the All Progressives Congress (APC) to the Peoples Democratic Party.

In the course of the press conference, I made certain comments about Dr Ortom on the basis of information I have since found to be false and baseless.

His Excellency Dr Samuel Ortom felt embarrassed, defamed and deeply aggrieved by the comments I made at the said press conference, culminating in litigation.

That politics aside, Governor Samuel Ortom is a dear friend and brother with whom I have shared so much in common, including mutual respect.

That as former colleagues and one time members of the Nigerian Governors’ forum and most importantly as someone whom I am just a phone call away from, any ridicule, embarrassment, spite and insult caused Dr Samuel Ortom is regretted.

Owing to the relationship we share and in the larger interest of peace, harmony and brotherliness, I believe a complete retraction of my comments made on 27th July, 2018, and which Dr Samuel Ortom found offensive is proper and necessary.

In view of all the above, I hereby retract the comments made during the press conference on 27th July, 2018, as it relates to Dr Samuel Ortom.

Signed:

Adams Aliyu Oshiomhole

Thursday, 18 March 2021

Ex-JAMB Registrar, Ojerinde, arrested, detained over alleged N900 million fraud

The anti-corruption agency says Mr Ojerinde was arrested on Monday and will soon be charged to court.

The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has arrested a former Registrar of the Joint Admission and Matriculation Board (JAMB), Dibu Ojerinde.

A statement posted on the commission’s website on Wednesday said Mr Ojerinde was arrested on Monday and being held on a remand warrant for allegedly misappropriating N900 million.

It added that Mr Ojerinde allegedly perpetrated the fraud as JAMB registrar from April 10, 2012 to August 1, 2016 and the Registrar of the National Examination Council (NECO) between 1999 and 2007.

The commission said the suspect has, since his arrest, been answering questions on allegations of multiple identities, abuse of office, money laundering, tax evasion, making false statements, and awarding fraudulent contracts to untraceable shell companies.

The statement reads in part, “Professor Ojerinde, who was arrested on March 15, 2021, in Abuja, by operatives of ICPC, is alleged to have committed multiple frauds while heading JAMB and the National Examination Council (NECO).

“He has been detained by the commission for questioning over allegations of multiple identities, abuse of office, money laundering, tax evasion and making false statements to public officials.

“The former JAMB boss is also being questioned by the commission for allegedly awarding fraudulent contracts to shell companies which cannot be traced.

“He was alleged to have awarded contracts for the supply of pencil and eraser at the cost of N450 million each, to Double 07 Concept Limited and Pristine Global Concept Limited, respectively, between 2013 and 2014 while heading JAMB.

“There is no evidence to show that the items which are examination materials were supplied as the contractors cannot be found.”


Suspend 2023 general elections, 1999 Constitution – Yoruba leaders tell Buhari


Published

 

on

 

Some leaders of Yoruba ethnic group have urged President Muhammadu Buhari and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to with immediate effect, suspend the forthcoming 2023 general elections.

Those who addressed a press conference in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital Wednesday evening also called for the suspension of the 1999 constitution.

Spokesman of the group under the auspices of Nigerian Indigenous Nationalities Alliance for Self-Determination, (NINAS), Professor Banji Akintoye, noted that the call was necessary because Nigeria cannot progress under the current political structure.

Akintoye noted that the 1999 constitution was the cause of major problems the country was currently facing.

He said that the group was giving the federal government another 30 day ultimatum after the expiration of the 90-Day Notice of Grave Constitutional Grievances issued by NINAS to the Federal Government of Nigeria on December 16, 2020.

Akintoye, who addressed journalists on behalf of the group, insisted that the 1999 constitution was no doubt a collateral damage to the people of Nigeria, hence, the need for its suspension and suspension of future elections.

He also warned international money lenders not to lend Nigeria any money because Nigeria was now a disputed project.

Akintoye said, “A formal announcement by the Federal Government of Nigeria acknowledging the Constitutional Grievances and Sovereignty Dispute now declared by the peoples of South and Middle-Belt of Nigeria.

“A Formal Commitment by Federal Government of Nigeria to the wholesale Decommissioning and Jettisoning of the 1999 Constitution as the Basis of the Federation of Nigeria as was done by the Government of Apartheid-Era South Africa in 1990, to commence the process by which the Apartheid Constitution of the then South Africa was eased out.

“A Formal Announcement by the Federal Government of Nigeria suspending further General Elections under the Disputed 1999 Constitution since winners of such Elections will Swear to, and Govern by that Constitution.

“A Formal Invitation to the Peoples of the South and Middle-Belt of Nigeria to work out and emplace a Transitional Authority, which shall specify the Modalities for the Transitioning Process including the Composition and Mandate of the Transitional Authority as well as the Time-frame for the Transitioning and other Ancillary Matters.

“A Formal Initiation of a Time-Bound Transitioning Process to midwife the emergence of Fresh Constitutional Protocols by a Two-Stage Process in which the Constituent Regional Blocs will at the first stage, Distill and Ratify their various Constitutions by Referendums and Plebiscites and in the second stage, Negotiate the Terms of Federating afresh as may be dictated by the outcomes of Referendum and Plebiscites.

“Let it be known to all, including International Money Lenders, that Nigeria is now a Disputed Project and that while the Constituent Components commit to honouring existing International Debt Obligations.

“We caution that whatever Obligations that may arise from any Foreign Loans contracted by the Federal Government of Nigeria from the date of this Proclamation may come into controversy. Similarly, all Loans contracted by the Federal Government of Nigeria, containing any Clause that may Cede the Sovereignty of Nigeria or any part thereof in the event of Repayment Default shall be disputed as illicit, and in breach of the Sovereignty of the Federating Units.”


Vivacious Miriam Olusanya angles as new GTBank boss… as first ever female MD/CEO


 

Vivacious Miriam Olusanya angles as new GTBank boss… as first ever female MD/CEO

 

 

 

 

 

The succession tussle in one of Nigeria’s commercial banks is still taking a dramatic turn, with tongues wagging about who takes over eventually, at the expiration of the incumbent MD/CEO in few months’ time.

Just as speculations are becoming rife about her ascendancy as the next boss of Guaranty Trust Bank, in replacement of the outgoing MD/CEO of the bank, Segun Agbaje, Mrs. Miriam Olusanya is already ground-swelling to take over the mantle of leadership, all things being equal.

The internal bickering is so tough but enmeshed in cold tones that there are other contenders for the plum post. These stiff contenders, all directors of the bank, but not limited to Ademola Odeyemi, Bolaji Lawal, Haruna Musa, and Babajide Okuntola. Ab initio, the tussle had been between Miriam Olusanya and Bolaji Lawal; but recent developments are pointing in the direction of Mrs. Olusanya, who is believed to be the favourite of Agbaje.

Those in the know of happenings at the bank, say that if eventually Miriam succeeds Agbaje, it would have been a big conquest for Segun Agbaje, who is touted to be taking over the entire managerial dynasty from the original founders of the bank, Fola Adeola and late Tayo Aderionokun.

What makes the battle even more intense is that GTBank is currently without a substantive Deputy Managing Director, who would have easily stepped into the shoes of Agbaje. Banjo Adegboungbe, the former DMD, was appointed in February 2020 as the substantive MD/CEO of Coronation Merchant Bank, and he has not been replaced since then, which further threw the slot open to the executive directors.

The GTBank board is, however, said to be on the lookout for a candidate that possesses the grit, gut and genius of Agbaje, and never a lily-livered person. The board reportedly also wants an intrepid MD that can take on debtors without batting an eyelid or caring whose ox is gored. This is where Miriam comes in handy, given her sterling profile and credentials.

Regarded as a banker’s banker with a proactive and pragmatic approach to 21st Century banking, Mrs. Miriam Chidiebele Olusanya has over 20 years’ experience spanning Transaction Services, Treasury, Assets and Liability Management, Corporate Finance and Wholesale Banking. She joined GTBank in 1998 and has been in charge of managing its Naira and Foreign Currency Balance Sheet, Asset and Liability Position and Money Market, Foreign Currency and Bonds Trading. She holds a Bachelor of Pharmacy degree from the University of Ibadan (1995) and a Master of Business Administration (Finance and Accounting) from the University of Liverpool (2011). She has attended many executive management and banking-specific programs in leading educational institutions abroad.

Many of her colleagues believe that she stands in good stead to succeed Agbaje. She does too; and the argument is that with the new wave of women taking up leadership positions in many banks, Miriam’s ascendancy at GTBank would be perfect if GTBank looks the way of Mrs. Olusanya as the new GMD/CEO, and a record-breaking achievement as the first female MD/CEO of the bank.

Additional Information: Thecapital.ng

EFCC uncovers how FIRS director received over N700m cash payment

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, has uncovered how a former Coordinating Director of Federal Inland Revenue Service, Peter Hena, received over N700 million cash between January 2017 and December 2018.

The Commission had last Thursday arraigned Mr Hena on 42-count before Justice Ijeoma Ojukwu of the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja.

Also arraigned were the Director of Finance,Mohammed Auta; Amina Sidi (Finance and Account department); Umar Aduka (Internal Audit); Mbura Mustapha (Deputy Manager); Obi Malachy (Services Group); Obaje Adofu (Head of Budget); Udo-Inyang Alfred (Officer II) and Benjamin Jiya (Assistant Director).

According to the charge sheet obtained by The Punch, Mr Hena and eight others shared N4.5 billion in illegal estacodes and fraudulent Duty Tour Allowances.

The statement disclosed that while being FIRS coordinating director, Hena accepted N45m cash from Auta without going through a financial institution contrary to section 1(a) and punishable under section 16(2) (b) of the Money Laundering Prohibition Act,2011 as amended by Act No. 1 of 2012.

EFCC investigations also revealed that Mr Hena received another N75m cash payment from Mbura and N99m from Okeke.

Count six of the charge further stated, “That you, Peter Hena, while being Co-coordinating director in the Federal Inland Revenue Service between January 2017 and December 2018 in Abuja within the jurisdiction of this Honourable court did accept N127m from Benjamin Jiya which exceeded N5m without going through a financial institution contrary to section 1(a) and punishable under section 16(2) (b) of the Money Laundering Prohibition Act,2011 as amended by Act No. 1 of 2012.”

The first defendant was also said to have received N145m cash from Sidi of the FIRS Finance and Accounts department.

Detectives also discovered that Hena similarly received N92m cash from Aduku and another N128.6m from Auta who was said to have taken possession of N258.6m from other FIRS officials.

In addition, the EFCC stated that Auta while being finance director retained N85m “under the guise that the funds was for stakeholders” when he reasonably ought to have known that the fund formed proceeds of unlawful activities, fraud, corruption and criminal appropriation of public funds.

Mr Aduka was found to have transferred N200m to Mr Hena, and also paid N97.1m into his own GTB bank account number 0023004712 under the guise of duty tour allowances.