Monday 27 August 2012

Buhari Blasts IBB, Obasanjo, Jonathan For ‘Killing’ Nigeria’s Oil Industry.



By SaharaReporters, New York
Former Head of State and presidential candidate of the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) in the 2011 general election, General Muhammadu Buhari, today blamed President Goodluck Jonathan, as well as former rulers Ibrahim Babangida and Olusegun Obasanjo, for killing the nation’s oil industry.
He also heaped blame for the security challenges now besetting the nation on the insincerity of Nigerian leaders.
General Buhari was speaking in Kaduna while playing host to leaders and members of the CPC, led by the House of Representatives member from Funtua/Dandume Federal Constituency of Katsina State, Dr. Mansur Abdulkadir.  They were on a courtesy visit to the party leader ahead of the forthcoming local government elections in Katsina, Buhari's home state.

He said that the administration of General Ibrahim Babangida was responsible for the high level of corruption and destruction in the petroleum industry, and added that the corrupt practices in the oil sector during the eras of Babangida, Obasanjo and Jonathan was to enslave the masses.

Looking forward, he called on Nigerians to come up with trusted leaders to steer the affairs of the nation if she is to move forward and realize its quest for development.
"The biggest challenge of Nigeria is for adequate security to be in place and ways in which we can protect the riches of this country and provide job opportunities for the youths in the country, so that we can build more industries as it was before,” he said.  “Inability of these industries to work has brought mistrust and corruption to Nigeria. Therefore, our leaders have to be sincere and lead with the fear of God and carry all along for Nigeria to be a better place.”

He challenged the nation’s leaders to honour promises made to the people, stressing that Nigeria cannot move forward if things that are supposed to be put in place are not.
In that regard, he stressed that the money which was siphoned in the recent pension scam and the petroleum industry scam must be brought back into the government’s coffers for good leadership.

He warned that all those that want the masses to vote and be voted for should go to the masses and get their mandate, and that the era of using force or bribing the masses to get political office is gone.

"A leader that wants to be a good leader must [look at] the needs of the people, the suffering, and the humiliation, and proffer solution to those problems and together we shall achieve greatness," he said.

N5000 note: Governor Sanusi Lamido Sanusi’s Logic.


My timeline has since been inundated with cries of “we don’t want!” the new N5000 note. I even joined at intervals away from my #SaveDebbie crowd-sourcing efforts. I then read the document below. So, let us keep the emotional arguments away for a while and argue against his own reasons behind the the “CURE” project of the Central Bank…that is, rationally argue bereft of weak cliches we have come to be used to. See the text below and you can also download:
PRESS BRIEFING BY THE GOVERNOR, CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA, MALLAM SANUSI
LAMIDO SANUSI, CON, ON THE PROPOSED CURRENCY RESTRUCTURING EXERCISE,
“PROJECT CURE”

PROTOCOL
Gentlemen of the Press, I welcome you to the briefing on the currency restructuring
exercise being implemented by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).
Before I proceed, I would like to use this opportunity to express our gratitude to you all
for the support you have given to the Bank thus far, by helping in disseminating
information about our policies, programmes and activities. I urge you to continue
along this path of fruitful collaboration and support in the interest of our economy.
I am delighted to brief you today on the CBN’s proposed currency restructuring
exercise, which we have code-named “PROJECT CURE”. As you all know, one of the
core mandates of the CBN, like monetary authorities across the world, is the issuance
and management of the legal tender currency. This implies that the CBN is responsible
for the entire process of currency production and it includes the following elements:
design, production, storage, distribution and the disposal of unfit banknotes. An
important component of our responsibility is ensuring an optimal currency structure in
terms of efficiency, cost effectiveness and balanced mix of various denominations. It
entails the CBN being responsive to the changing needs of the economy and keeping
pace with evolving trends in contemporary currency technology-world.
In addition, in line with international best practices, monetary authorities are required to
review their nations’ currencies at intervals of between five (5) and eight (8) years. This
is done in order to address, among other factors, inevitable weaknesses and challenges 2
identified in the circulating banknotes and coins. These factors usually arise from
innovations in technology, aesthetics, security considerations and so on.
In the case of Nigeria’s currency, the following table clearly shows the period some
denominations have been circulating without any major review:

S/N Denomination Date Restructured No. of years

1. N100 December 1999 13
2. N200 November 2000 12
3. N500 April 2001 11
4. N1,000 October 2005 7
In Nigeria, the last comprehensive review of the currency was carried out in 2005. It
resulted in the introduction of the N20 polymer banknote followed by the varnishing of
the N5, N10 and N50 paper banknotes in 2007. These lower denomination notes were
eventually converted into polymer banknotes in 2009.
As a first step towards this routine exercise, the CBN carried out a review of the existing
currency series in 2010. The exercise threw up several revelations and challenges such
as the following:
? Public apathy towards the usage of the 50K, N1 and N2 coins, introduced in
February, 2007.
? The varnished lower denomination banknotes failed to adequately meet
expected longevity.
? Significant difficulties associated with the processing and destruction
(briquetting) of the polymer banknotes. It is important to add that this situation
has largely constrained the realisation of the benefits expected from polymer
banknotes over paper notes.
? The tactile feature for the visually impaired on the polymer notes has not been as
effective as desired.
In the light of the observed challenges, the CBN conducted several stakeholders’ fora
in 2011 on currency restructuring to gauge public and independent perspectives on the 3
existing banknotes and coin series. The issues raised and the subsequent findings and
decisions were summarised as follows:
? Due to inflationary pressures, the CBN should coin lower denominations of
currency up to N100. The relevant denominations in this category are N5, N10,
N20, N50 and N100;
? Need to encourage the usage of coins; and
? Enhancement of the quality of banknotes.
? The CBN should introduce higher denomination banknotes to discourage
dollarization, reduce the volume of banknotes as well as the overall cost of
currency management.
Gentlemen of the Press, we are now about to embark on another comprehensive
review of our national currency structure. The impending review exercise is aimed at
achieving the following objectives:
(i) Upgrading the design of the entire existing range of currency
denominations in order to enhance the quality and integrity of the
banknotes;
(ii) Incorporating a more effective feature for the visually challenged;
(iii) Introducing new security features on the redesigned banknotes. The
intention here is to enable us take ownership and control of the new
features on the series and eliminate payment of royalties on patented
security features;
(iv) Achieving an optimal currency structure that will ensure cost effectiveness
and balanced mix and utilization of all the currency denominations;
(v) Introducing new series of coins that would be generally acceptable for
purposes of transaction; and
(vi) Reducing the cost of production, distribution and disposal of banknotes
by introducing a higher bill that would reduce the volume and cost of
notes in circulation. The savings would be channeled to provide
incentives for the usage and acceptance of coins. 4
As a means of realising the above objectives, several entities have collaborated to
redesign the new currency series. These include the Currency Operations Department,
Nigerian Security Printing and Minting Company (NSPM) Plc, along with competent
international consultants.
On the 28
th of November, 2011, the CBN Board considered and approved the new
currency series. It subsequently sought and on the 19
th of December, 2011 obtained
the approval of His Excellency, the President, Dr. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, GCFR.
Under the new structure, the existing denominations of N50, N100, N200, N500 and
N1,000 will be redesigned with added new security features. It is our pleasure to inform
you that a new high currency denomination will also be introduced. It is the N5,000
note. In the same vein, the lower banknote denominations of N5, N10 and N20 will be
coined. Consequently, the Naira currency structure will now be twelve (12); these are
six (6) coins and six (6) banknote denominations. The details are as follows:
Coins Banknotes
50K N50
N1 N100
N2 N200
N5 N500
N10 N1,000
N20 N5,000
Presently, efforts are being put in place to ensure that the redesigned N50 and the new
N5,000 banknotes should be launched early in 2013.
It has been argued that the introduction of a higher denomination banknote could
exert inflationary pressures in the economy. Ladies and gentlemen, inflation in Nigeria is
a monetary phenomenon. Secondly, in some countries such as Singapore, Germany
and Japan the highest denominations are 10,000 SGD, €500 and Yen10,000
respectively. These denominations have relatively high dollar equivalent. The levels of
inflation are, however, low at 2.8, 1.1, and -0.7 as at 2010.
Furthermore, we believe that the introduction of a higher bill would complement the
Bank’s cash less policy as it would substantially reduce the volume of currency-incirculation particularly in the long term. 5
To encourage the usage of coins the CBN would liaise with relevant MDAs, DMBs, road
transport workers, market operators, small businesses, supermarkets, vendors, etc to
create avenues for the usage of the coins. We would ensure that coin collection is
convenient and the infrastructure readily assessable.
Please note that the introduction of the new currency series will be a gradual process,
as the banknotes will circulate simultaneously with the old series until they are fully
withdrawn from circulation. Therefore, there would be no urgent need for exchange of
the old for the new banknotes by the general public for as long as the old banknotes
are in circulation, they will remain legal tender.
Gentlemen of the Press, this is an overview of our currency restructuring exercise, known
as “PROJECT CURE”. I request that you join us in our effort to provide our country with a
befitting currency structure that will be an effective facilitator of economic activities.
Thank you for your kind attention.
Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, CON
Governor, CBN
23rd August, 2012

How to get Nigeria back on track, by Tinubu, Soyinka, others.


From left : Governor Abiola Ajimobi, Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, Rev. Jesse Jackson, Prof. Wole Soyinka, Mr. Brian Browne and Mr. Howard Jetter at the book launch on Saturday From left : Governor Abiola Ajimobi, Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, Rev. Jesse Jackson, Prof. Wole Soyinka, Mr. Brian Browne and Mr. Howard Jetter at the book launch on Saturday.
 
IT was meant to be a presentation of the book jointly written by Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) National Leader Asiwaju Bola Tinubu and United States former Consul-General in Niageria Brian Borwne in Chicago, the United States (US), but it became a forum where suggestions were offered on how to get Nigeria’s economy out of the woods.
Literary icon Prof Wole Soyinka, who wrote the foreward to “Financialism - Water from an Empty Well”,  and co-author Tinubu, warned of the consequences of leaving the dwindling economy in the hands of half-baked and inexperienced managers to fix.
 At the Rainbow Push Headquarters in Chicago, venue of the presentation on Saturday were civil rights activist Rev. Jesse Jackson Jnr, Borwne, many Nigerian professionals resident in Chicago and other parts of the US,  former American diplomats, and civil rights leaders. 
In the audience also were: Governors Rauf Aregbesola (Osun) and Abiola Ajimobi (Oyo), Nigerian lawmakers, council chairmen and youths. 
Soyinka warned that it was dangerous to allow leaders who lack the wherewithal to lead the country on the path of economic perdition. 
According to him, one of such leaders ruled Nigeria for about eight years recently and only succeeded in multiplying Nigeria’s economic woes. 
His words: “I have no qualms declaring that I am not fully economic literate. That is why I leave it to the experts to figure out. First, let it be clearly stated that I am not in the least embarrassed or ashamed to acknowledge myself as an economic illiterate. 
“This is quite unlike a former head of state, who was thus dubbed and never forgave his perceptive analyst, even after his death. That economist was my late friend, Prof Ojetunde Aboyade, the only ‘specialist’ from whom I received any insightful…”
 While presenting the book, Soyinka acknowledged Tinubu and Browne as key figures in the unfolding world where the book they have both written opens a new window of how the world’s financial system was designed to the disadvantage of many people.  
Soyinka said: “The skewed world of economics needs to be challenged. A world where the umbilical cord between produce and tally-card was slashed when no one was looking, and the latter has come to be a thing-in-itself, empowering a parasitic class of finance controllers who place the mere tally over and above the material goods – yet succeed in making the rest of the world fall in line! 
“The collapse of the dominating economies of Europe and America is a call for re-thinking, away from orthodox assumptions and givens, under which satellite economies in a distant continent like ours have taken a severe beating, whether or not their governments choose to admit it”. 
Rev. Jackson Jnr, who moderated the book presentation and signing, said the time has come for both Africa and African –American perspective to fuse into one because both are challenged by similar issues. 
He welcomed the fact that the exposition in the book raises fundamental issues.
He provided answers to why Africa and African –Americans live under a discriminatory economic system. 
Tinubu stated the rationale behind the book publication, saying he was provoked by the injustices of the economic system and how the contradictions eventually caught up with the players, who left the low level income earner and small businesses with the short end of the stick.
Tinubu said: “Productive capitalism relies on the discipline of the market place. What now occurs is that powerful actors exploit the licence the market place affords them. In doing so, they endanger the very economies from which they unduly profit. 
“In other words, they have emptied the well yet continue to seek to take water from it. These people practice a speculative brand of economics. My co-author and I, have given this mutation of capitalism the name of ‘financialism’. Financialism is capitalism so shorn of all restraint that it cannibalizses itself” 
The former Lagos State governor decried the wiping away of the earnings of the struggling segment of the society and demanded a new thinking and approach on how to deal with the problem. 
“Recurrent crises show that something is profoundly wrong with the global financial system. Unless we want to suffer these damaging jolts for the foreseeable future, we need to make systemic corrections. 
“Both developed and emergent nations have committed the similar sin of turning what should be productive economies into factories of financial speculation that generate more financial paper than they do material products that real people can use to improve their living conditions”. 
Giving Nigerian leaders food for thought, Tinubu said: “Nigeria needs to be put to work. We have a lot of catching up to do. Asian governments support the industrialisation of their economies. Wise European nations are starting to retool their industrial base. “Nigeria cannot hope to achieve prosperity simply by exporting exhaustible natural resources. We must follow the historic route that all large nations have followed in reaching national prosperity. We must make, create and export what we make and create”.
 Browne argued that recession has put black America into a structural recession. 
He said: “The financial system has become over inflated and incestuous to the point of killing the productive sector.”
Brian maintained that Africans cannot be orphans on their own land and the 21st Century story of Africa must be written by Africans. 
Ambassador Howard Jeter, who reviewed the book, stated that the two perspectives from Africa and the United States offer an invaluable insight into the global financial structure and offers practical solutions and challenges what we know as impositions.
 Aregbesola and Ajimobi also aligned with the call for a more global equitable financial order.

The Nation.

Show us Jonathan’s achievement, Junaid Mohammed blasts Gulak.

By SONI DANIEL
ABUJA—Second Republic lawmaker, Dr. Junaid Mohammed, has given a stern warning to the Political Adviser to President Goodluck Jonathan, Mr. Ahmed Gulak, to desist from hauling insults on Nigerians because of his selfish interest.
Besides, he has challenged the president’s aide to show to Nigerians what his boss has achieved so far in office to warrant celebration by the citizens.
Mohammed and former FCT minister, Nasir El-Rufai, apparently incurred the wrath of Gulak for recently criticising President Goodluck Jonathan for not doing enough to protect lives and property of Nigerians following rising insecurity in parts of the North.
The duo had recently asked the president to step aside if he could not solve the country’s raging insecurity.
Responding to the verbal assaults on the President in the media, Gulak described Mohammed has having ‘diarrhoea of the mouth’ and asked him to desist from talking as he was the leader of the North. He also described El-Rufai as a disappointment to Nigerians.
But in an interview with Vanguard, Mohammed warned the President’s aide to stop giving the impression that all was well in the country just because of what he was benefiting from the system while the majority of Nigerians were languishing in squalor.
Mohammed, who is the National Chairman of the Peoples Salvation Party, said, “I would not dignify Gulak with a response because he knows that what they are doing is not good for this country.
“The fact remains that no matter what he says Nigerians can see that this country is not on the right path.  I have gone too far in this game to waste my time on nonentities. I am a leader of the people. I have no personal interest in what I am doing.
“Even if it is President Jonathan’s father who is going to do an objective assessment of the administration, he would not claim that Jonathan’s Presidency is a success.
“Gulak should stop insulting well-meaning Nigerians who have seen it all and are selfless enough to advise the administration on how to make things better for the majority of the people. He should not use his office to attack innocent persons just because of his personal interest,” the PSP leader said.
On the alleged attempt by former President Olusegun Obasanjo to anoint the next president and vice president, Mohammed described the move as an act that could cause disaffection, if not well handled.
While advising the former president not to take delight in always presenting himself as a kingmaker, he however said that he would be the happiest man on earth if the crisis would degenerate further and lead to an implosion in PDP.
He said, “If this controversy generated by the alleged anointing of certain persons by Obasanjo or any other one will degenerate and lead to an implosion of the PDP and it disappears from the surface of the earth, I would be the happiest Nigerian on earth.”

The Jonathan We Know – A Response To The Antics Of Reuben Abati.


By Dr. Olusegun Fakoya
These are indeed precarious times for Reuben Abati. And like any sinking man, desperate to hold on to a fast dwindling job, Dr Abati has resorted to desperate measures. The flurry of articles from him in recent times speaks volumes about his desperation. For a man who hid under the “umblellah” (sorry, umbrella) of social activism for many years, the opportunity to partake in the sweetness of power has been a mesmerizing experience which he is in no hurry to willingly relinquish. Dr Abati desperation is such that he has even resorted to abusing and insulting Nigerians. His latest article titled “The Jonathan they don’t know” is just another wasteful enterprise aimed at refurbishing a bad product. It is rather too late in the day to attempt to turn an imbecile into a genius.

Reuben, in his desperate article created a strategic divide based on perceived loyalty or otherwise. A very unfortunate division was created based on activism or passivism. His battle line consists of the “They” and the loyalists. Loyalists, by his definition, being those benefitting from the potpourri. Those in the privileged league of the manipulators and beneficiaries of our commonwealth. Those who persistently deny the nation of deserved economic and material development. The thieves who roam the corridor of power and keeps the lock to same in their bulging pockets. These, to Reuben Abati, are the good Nigerians, those who have left Goodluck Jonathan in peace. The “They” according to Abati “refers to all the cynics, the pestle-wielding critics, the unrelenting, self-appointed activists, the idle and idling, twittering, collective children of anger, the distracted crowd of Facebook addicts, the BBM-pinging soap opera gossips of Nigeria, who seem to be in competition among themselves to pull down President Goodluck Jonathan” Obviously, to this exalted company belongs the likes of Sonala Olumhense, Pius Adesanmi, Okey Ndibe and a host of others. I must confess that my humble self also has company in this prestigious group. Reuben, however, belongs to that other group of “good Nigerians” those who sleep and wake up with scandals, those who keep corruption as comfortable bed fellows. We heard of the rumbles of the Abuja plots of land, even when Abati was pretending to be a social critic. This rumble had hardly abated when the opportunity to explore his true identity came by the way of the presidential appointment.
To Reuben, the group of “They” are a “bunch of unintelligent people repeating stupid clichés and too many intelligent persons wasting their talents lending relevance to thoughtless conclusions”. So, our exalted group of “They” consists of either plainly stupid people or naively intelligent people.  It is worth restating that Reuben Abati once belonged to this maligned group. Reuben’s insult to the intelligentsia and those Nigerians who have sacrificed so much to ensure that the Nigerian state assumes its true position in the comity of nations is unpardonable. It is bad enough for a hypocrite to denounce his initial constituency, it is criminal to turn around and lambast same for failing to see the sense in your sudden turncoat and imminent disintegration. It is so easy to castigate the same group of “They” who fought to ensure that the Jonathan Presidency becomes a reality. Has Reuben pondered on the causes of the massive evaporation of the uninhibited flow of affection and national support for candidate Jonathan?  What turned the almost hysterical Jonathan-mania into rabid Jonathan-phobia? Conscience, they say,  is an open wound…. Only truth can heal it.
Reuben’s effort to blow the trumpet of achievement for Goodluck Jonathan sounded very hollow, even on the pages on which they were written. For a previously “shoeless” President (Reuben can never stop us from making reference to this appropriate description) who promised heaven and earth on his campaign trips, the boast of 4,400 MW of electricity in a nation that is still in perpetual darkness went beyond the bounds of pardonable mischief. Reuben’s lukewarm reference to presidential concerns on corruption is nothing but laughable – “That is why he has directed the relevant agencies to get corrupt persons to answer for their misdeeds” Reuben, when the current charade on corruption is over, we hope that genuine convictions would indeed be possible. Farouk Lawan is still a free man, walking and enjoying free sunshine with millions of bribe money yet to be accounted for. Otedola’s cheeks are growing rosier every day while the nation’s Attorney-General is probably the richest Nigerian today courtesy of a lax regime that encourages graft. Furthermore, Reuben’s attempt to speak about his master’s inordinate love for the women folk smirks of nothing but jest. True, Jonathan has loads of females in his government compared to his predecessors. However, the concern of majority of Nigerians is with the innate penchant of this man to surround himself with the most corrupt and despicable Nigerians ever created, whether males or females.
Without wasting so many words like Reuben is fond of doing, the truth about Goodluck Jonathan stares at one in the face. It is not for nothing that he is viewed as clueless. This is a simple English expression within the grasp of even the barely literate. Jonathan has so far demonstrated his lack of understanding of the basic mechanism of governance, the constitutional and moral obligation of a government to the people and the fine etiquettes of Presidential approach. He is an opportunist who jumped at the ship of state without adequate preparation. His government is belligerent; an example is the latest crude and rude articles from Reuben Abati and the unpalatable appointment of Doyin Okupe as a frenzied attack dog. Jonathan is manifestly corrupt and he has no qualms in attempting to brush this under the carpet. It is beyond comprehension, that the President of over 150 million people, people who continue to excel in various spheres of human endeavour, would publicly declare on national television that he does not give a damn about declaring his assets. Reuben Abati is yet to address this sore point in his numerous essays.
Abati has my sympathy in his attempt to refurbish the morally tainted and structurally deformed presidency of Goodluck Jonathan. True, Jonathan is “nationalistic” in orientation in terms of federal appointments (to use the Nigerian phrase, he is a good disciple of national character), nevertheless, former criminals of the creeks are now handling sensitive national security apparatus. The old Ijaw Generals of the ill-famed creek wars are now multi-billionaires, smiling comfortably to the banks every month, courtesy of a truly national President. The likes of General Tompolo et al. Who cares whether Jonathan eats cassava or whole meal bread or even boiled plantain for that matter? The key thing is that in an austere environ when millions are out of jobs, when crime is blooming like the old Onitsha market and when terrorism is sweeping the land like a raging inferno, our belligerent President spends billions annually on food. This is an undisputable fact that Reuben failed to address. Abati has gone miles in his unfortunate academic odyssey of rationalising a bad product. He has thrown terms around, starting with Corporate Social Responsibility, a la the infamous Otuoke Church building, to the new “Saul Complex” in his latest tirade. Whether corporate responsibility or Saul Complex, a decaying product would always stink, no matter the intensity of the advertisement.
The Jonathan we know? The Jonathan we know is a President who promised so much and yet intent on delivering so little. The Jonathan we know is an opportunist. An over-ambitious man toying with the fate of millions. The Jonathan we know is a man who assumes a position of authority fully beyond his capability and comprehension. The Jonathan we know is a President who is so enwrapped in the loin clothes of his wife such that the country is actually confused as to who is in power.  He thus brought nothing but baggage into the act of governance. The Jonathan we know is a president who glorifies corruption and embraces its evil warmth – “if corruption does not kill Nigeria, Nigeria will kill corruption” The Jonathan we know is a non-performing President, a colossal failure. This is the verdict of the people, Reuben.
No Nigerian has any quarrel with any part of the country producing the leadership. What we care about is performance. We care less whether the President is an Itsekiri or Ibibio. We have no qualms with the Ijaws (whether the 4th most populous or 10th most populous) producing the President. All we desire is a leader intent on ridding our body polity of its various nuances. A leader committed to emancipating the fast dwindling lots of poor Nigerians. A leader committed to faithfully fighting the strangulating hold of corruption and the endless evils that have truncated our march to greater glory. We need a leader that can go beyond the pretences of party politics and truly be a leader indeed. Our complaints against the lacklustre performance of Jonathan have nothing to do with his ethnic origin, Reuben and mavericks like him do not need to confuse issues. We simply do not want the man because he is not performing. Period.
Yes, great minds like Abraham Lincoln, Mahtama Ghandi, Martin Luther King and Kwame Nkrumah made the world easier. Yet whatever they achieved was with plainness of approach, honesty and integrity. They were not achieved with the purchase of hundreds of porch cars for a frivolous and egomaniac meeting of wives of discredited heads of governments. They were not achieved on the lavish expenditure of state fortune on state banquets or meals. They were not attained with dourness and stupidity. They came out of a vibrant methodology and pragmatic visions. Jonathan lacks these qualities. Comparing the man Jonathan to these great minds is illusory and vain.
Reuben’s attempt is that of a sinking man desperately trying to catch a lifeline of straw.

Boko Haram Are Ignorant “Muslims” – MuslimsAgainstTerror Group Says.


Salam Alaikum
This is information for those who want to think that Boko Haram is fighting an Islamic cause.
Indeed, Boko Haram are simply very ignorant Muslims, even if we can call them Muslims.
We all know that it is haram and highly repudiated for Muslims to kill any innocent person, of any faith. But this is not what we will discuss here. We will simply put forth a few popular statements that Boko Haram use to brainwash the unfortunate, ignorant Muslims around them for support, that are very ignorant and un Islamic.

Firstly Boko Haram have said that the earth is flat.

It is very sad that the media publishes the nonsense that they say. Islam contributed immensely to the advancement of the human race and technology. We had the Islamic golden ages when Islam was advanced in medicine, engineering, economics, law and the like in Africa(Timbuktu empire), Geda in Kenya, etc,  as well as in the Middle East, great cities of knowledge like Baghdad.
These have been referred to as the Golden ages, when the Muslim world was in a technological revolution and the western world was in its dark ages of ignorance. Indeed many argue that Europe came and stole these advances from the Muslim world to spur their technological revolution.
Boko Haram are the most different and ignorant Muslims in the entire world. No other place can such ignorance be found, except with the Europeans in the dark ages when the plague overtook them due to their backwardness. Islam does not support such backwardness. Indeed Islam and the Holy Books of the Deen have been found to have a great deal of advanced scientific thinking.
So on the issue of the world being flat that Boko Haram are still so deluded to follow the European ignorant thinking about, indeed it is Boko Haram that is westernized in the sense of the western ignorance of the dark ages. Here is the Islamic position(Allahu Alim):
This is from the Rashad Khalifa translation of the Quranic verse, with the accurate meaning and translation for the Word “dahaha”:

Quran 79:30 He made the earth egg-shaped.

So, we see that Islamic thinking was actually correct, while the old day ignorant European who Boko Haram follow had it wrong. From this advanced knowledge, Islam is credited for having some of the greatest navigators, and for developing the compass. The Muslims developed great astronomical tools, including the Astrolabe, an astronomical computer, and these spurred todays technological advances in these fields.

The history of the astrolabe begins more than two thousand years ago. The principles of the astrolabe projection were known before 150 B.C., and true astrolabes were made before A.D. 400. The astrolabe was highly developed in the Islamic world by 800 and was introduced to Europe from Islamic Spain (al-Andalus) in the early 12th century. It was the most popular astronomical instrument until about 1650, when it was replaced by more specialized and accurate instruments. Astrolabes are still appreciated for their unique capabilities and their value for astronomy education. Link: http://www.astrolabes.org/
The Astrolabe works on the principle and knowledge of a round earth and round planets.
Boko Haram are a very annoying problem, and we wonder what they are and what dungeon they come from. It is hard to believe that they are Muslim, except that Abubakar Shekau guy that tries to speak as a Muslim, but from all indications and on the bases of their ignorance, they are not Muslim.

Boko Haram denies rain formation by evaporation

Again this is another most embarrassing and un Islamic statement. This is the misconception of ‘Allah Creates’, and people think that to ‘originate a creation’, is not the same as to create. They are so ignorant that they think in terms of our limited mind, that Allah just makes rain, and they do not understand that He makes rain indeed in a miracle of evaporation-condensation.
Noble Quran says:
 “ We (Allah) send down water from the sky in measure an lodged it in the ground and we certainly are able to withdraw it “ (Sura 23, 18-19 Verses) the above verses are explaining the complete water cycle i.e., water fall, penetration of water in the soil and evaporation phenomenon.
“ Allah is the one who sends forth the winds which rised up the clouds he spreads them in the sky as he wills and breaks them into the fragments then thou seest raindrops issuing from within them (Sura 30, Verse 48) “
The above verses clarify the processes of evaporation, condensation, fragmentation and rain-cycle.
   “ We send for the winds that fecundate. We cause the water to descend from the sky we provide you with the water you could not be the guardian of its reserves (Sura 15, 22 Verse)

Link: http://www.irfi.org/articles/articles_51_100/hydrology_or_water_cycle_in_qur.htm
We can go on and on on these grave errors and insults to Islam, to humanity and insults to the brain by Boko Haram. But what is the use? The ignorant people they brainwash need to read and learn more about Islam, they need to read print outs of this information, unfortunately, many can not even read Quran.
Boko Haram pays them as little as N7000 to kill for them. It is poverty of their minds and poverty of their religion that is affecting them. May Allah(S) help them and lead them to knowledge and the true religion of peace before it is too late for them and they enter hell eternally. Ameen.
Peace to everyone

Yoruba People: The Most Religious Tolerant People On Earth.




Are the Yoruba the number one in religious tolerance?

August 24, 2012 by Azuka Onwuka
When it comes to religion, are the Yoruba people of Nigeria the most tolerant race in the whole world? It may not be wise to say yes because of the absence of any endorsement of such a position by a global body like the United Nations. But having travelled to many parts of Nigeria and some parts of the world; having read books about several peoples of the world, I can comfortably say that I have not seen or heard of any country or people that tolerate one another on the issue of religion like the Yoruba of Nigeria.
As a child growing up in Igboland, I thought the Igbo were the most tolerant in matters of religion. For example, the only mosque in my hometown Nnewi was built right at the gate of the Diocesan Church Centre of the Anglican Church, which was the central church for Anglicans in the town when the head of the diocese was in Onitsha. The mosque was owned by the Hausa-Fulani community. Items like sugarcane, carrot and kulikuli were sold beside the mosque, and cobblers took care of people’s shoes there. I never missed the sugarcane and kulikuli any time I had cause to be at the church. Christians never bothered that Muslims (who were not sons and daughters of the community) situated their mosque by the gate of the central church of the Anglican Communion in the town.
There was no Muslim in my primary school; in my secondary school, there was a Muslim boy – a boy whose father was a policeman posted to the town. On Thursdays when we had our moral instruction classes, the chaplain of the school who was also the vice-principal, always announced that the Muslim boy was the only one exempted from participating in moral instruction classes because the school had no Islamic teacher. Other pupils must either be at the Roman Catholic section or the Protestant section. We all envied the boy for the preferential treatment he always got as the only Muslim boy in our school.
With this type of background, I grew up with the assumption that the Igbo must be the most tolerant in matters of religion in Nigeria. But there were events that made me have a rethink later in life. When I was growing up, my community had two major Christian denominations: Anglicans and Catholics. Almost all the schools in the town were founded by the two churches. Parents usually sent their children to these schools based on their Christian denominations, even after the state government took over the schools. At the close of school each day, there was usually a point where pupils of the Anglican Church-founded schools met pupils of the Catholic Church-founded school. Preachers, church teachers and parents had indoctrinated the children that only their denomination was the one endorsed by God. So at such meetings, taunting songs would be sung and a fight would ensue between Anglican and Catholic children.
But that was not all. Many young men and women could not marry one another because one was Anglican and the other was Catholic. Especially from the Catholic community, it was always an uphill task for a girl to be allowed to be married by an Anglican or a member of the Protestant Church. But one thing that was shared by all the Christian denominations was that no married woman was allowed to attend a church different from the one her husband attended. The few who insisted on continuing with the church of their birth while in their matrimonial homes either caused a deep rift in their marriage or even lost their marriage entirely.
Compare that with a typical Yoruba family. A couple with six children could have a family like this: the man is a Muslim; the wife attends the Celestial Church of Christ; the first child started as a Muslim but converted to Christianity and is now a member of a Pentecostal church; the second child is a devout Muslim; the third and fifth children are members of the Methodist or Baptist church; the fourth child attends no church or mosque but prefers the Yoruba gods whenever he has any spiritual needs; and the last child is an Anglican.
One would assume that with this seemingly cacophony of religions in this family, there would be constant religious tension, hatred, quarrels and fights in it. No. In Yorubaland, no one disturbs the other because of religion. Interestingly, during Islamic festivals, Christians join their Muslim relatives to celebrate. Also during Christian festivals, the Muslims join their relatives to celebrate. For example, the Governor of Lagos State, Mr. Babatunde Fashola, is a Muslim, while his wife is a Christian.
In the larger Yoruba society, the issue of religion is not a factor while considering a candidate for an elective post. For example, Bola Tinubu, a Muslim, did two terms as Lagos State governor and handed over to Fashola, a Muslim, who is doing his second tenure in office now.
Such high level of religious tolerance is not even obtainable in countries that are known for freedom and rights like the United States of America and the United Kingdom. In such countries, even though there is religious freedom, there are certain social and political positions that some people may never dream of.
This wonderful trait of the Yoruba needs to be publicised. If such a trait were from an American community, several documentaries, films and books would have been produced based on it. If the Federal Government would not publicise such, it behoves the Yoruba nation to sponsor the production of such materials.
In addition, the Yoruba nation should embark on a religious-tolerance campaign across the federation and even the world. That will offer them the opportunity through which they will teach other races how they have mastered the art of religious tolerance. There is no denying that religion is a major threat to world peace today. Nigeria is getting its share of violence. Therefore, any effort that will help to reduce the threat will be a welcome development.
•Onwuka, a brand management strategist in Lagos, wrote in via azonwuka@yahoo.com