Thursday 29 November 2012

Blackout looms as Egbin power plant breaks down

by TUNDE DODONDAWA BLACK out looms in most part of the country as three out of the six turbines of 220 mega watts (MW) each in Egbin Hydro power plants collapsed on Thursday.
When the Nigerian Tribune visited the premises of Egbin power plant in Ijede, a suburb of Lagos State, on Thursday, it was learnt that two units of the largest hydro power plant in Lagos had collapsed.
Egbin power plant has capacity to generate 1320MW when operating at full capacity, but now it is generating below installed capacity at about 660MW.
The Chief Executive Officer of Egbin Hydro power plant, Mr Mike Uzoigwe, told Nigerian Tribune on telephone that he could not entertain calls because of an emergency at hand.
According to him, “there is an emergency that requires urgent attention. I am sorry I cannot attend to you now, but you can call me later.”
But a staff of the power plant who declined to give her name confirmed the incidents. According to her, “before now, we have five units working optimally, the sixth unit is undergoing some rehabilitation. Due to significant drop in water level at the dams, two units collapsed this morning, leaving only three working.”
However, when the Nigerian Tribune inquired from a source at the Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN) who preferred anonymity, he blamed the drop in power supply on drop in water level at the dams, system collapse, inadequate capacity and lack of needed infrastructure.
He explained that the problem is multifaceted.
According to him, “if you are familiar with the trend, you would have observed that during this period of each year, we usually experience this drop in power supply because of drop in water level.
“Unlike before when we had rainfall at its peak, you will experience greater output. So, power generation has dropped below 4000MW as we speak.
“There is breakdown of some TCN infrastructure as well which affects supply to distribution companies (Discos). The customers have direct interface with the Discos, but when they do not have enough supply from TCN to distribute to customers, then, there is a problem.
“We are not happy at the situation because it is affecting our image and we are suffering loss of revenue as well. But the engineers are working hard to resolve the problem at the TCN end. We are very sorry for this because we cannot give what we do not have,” he said.
NigerianTribune

2015: Jonathan, OBJ go to war over BoT chair


2015: Jonathan, OBJ go to war over BoT chair
•Anenih, Ali, others face election tonight
The PDP’s Bot election which will hold tonight at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, is expected to be a stormy session, as President Jonathan and Chief Obasanjo are expected to engage in a political duel to install a candidate to administer one of the sensitive organs of the party.
Former President Obasanjo had resigned his appointment as the BoT chairman, thus creating the vacuum that party leaders are expected to fill tonight. Whoever emerges, according to the party constitution, will serve a single term of five years. Main contenders for the office are former national chairman of the party, Dr Ahmadu Ali; former Works Minister, Chief Tony Anenih; former Senate President, Dr. Ken Nnamani and Chairman, Champion Newspapers, Chief Emmanuel Iwuanyanwu. Findings revealed that the Anenih’s candidature enjoys the support of President Jonathan and his foot soldiers had been impressing it on members of the BoT to support the former minister.
Anenih’s supporters flaunt his experience as former Chairman of the board and his ability to galvanise support for party position at critical moments. But party chieftains and members of the board from the North are opposed to Anenih. They frowned at an arrangement in the party which could throw up a stalwart from the South-South as the BoT chairman, against the backdrop of the body language of President Jonathan to contest the 2015 election. “It is the apprehension over 2015 that has made those who know what (Mr. Fix It as Anenih is called) can swing that has informed their vow that it could be anybody, but not Anenih.
A source revealed that it was not clear, if Chief Obasanjo has shifted his support for Dr Ali. “His proposal that the National Secretary of the board, Senator Walid Jubril should step down for Dr Ali, since both are from the North-Central would be resisted. Such a pleasant man who had been doing the job since Obasanjo left the office, would not be traded off like that, a source further submitted. “It is, however, not clear, if the former president would abandon Dr. Ali, for the candidature of Chief Iwuanyanwu, as it is being speculated. Recall that Anenih served as BoT chairman from 2003 to 2007 after Dr. Alex Ekwueme’s five years’ tenure as pioneer boss of the board.
Ekwueme, a former vice president in the Second Republic, and the founding protem National Chairman of the party, served as the BoT boss between 1998 and 2003. However, Anenih was displaced by Obasanjo in 2007 in what was akin to a palace coup, barely a month after the end of his second term as president. During his days as BoT boss, Anenih is known to have wielded great-influence in the affairs of the party especially in prosecuting its electoral wars nation-wide. On his part, Ali, a former minister of education, was national chairman of the party during the twilight of Obasanjo’s second term. Incidentally, he was the party boss at the same time Anenih was the BoT boss.
A key ally of the ex-president Obasanjo dating back to his regime as miliatry Head of State in the ‘70s, it is doubtful whether if the PDP former national chairman still enjoys the former leader’s confidence. According to the party’s constitution, about 120 members are qualified to vote for the BoT chairman. They include former presidents, vice presidents, former speakers, House of Representatives, ex-Senate presidents, former national chairmen and secretaries as well as serving ones.
TheSun

Much as President Jonathan can defend himself…


Much as President Jonathan can defend himself…
It is normal to assume that President Goodluck Jonathan can defend himself against unfair tactics by any of his predecessors. In a somber situation, there may also be not much wrong in occasional snipings by past leaders but to be appreciated, this can only be on two conditions. Such criticisms by past leaders must be openly well-meaning and must have historical value.
There lies the problem in the case of ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo, who is always there to pounce on any administrative problems of his successors as a military leader, predecessors as a supposedly elected leader, and now his successors as an elected leader. By the way, no matter the desperation, since everything in the fight-back by Jonathan’s aides is done in his name, nothing can excuse the cowardice in picking on Obasanjo by dragging in other innocent past leaders who so far have maintained the expected dignity by not publicly criticizing Jonathan.
Not even ex-head of state General Muhammadu Buhari could be faulted for publicly criticizing Jonathan. For some unknown reasons, a suspicious offer of dialogue/ceasefire purportedly from Boko Haram, mischievously mentioned General Buhari as an acceptable peace negotiator for Boko Haram. President Jonathan has not only discredited the genuineness of the group offering a negotiated settlement but also the very idea of peace offer at all. General Buhari was therefore correct by dismissing, earlier than Jonathan, the idea of ceasefire by an unknown group.
Neither should Jonathan (as portrayed by his aides) be upset because General Buhari pointed to Federal Government as comprising Boko Haram. Goodluck Jonathan himself was the first to give that indication when he (Jonathan) revealed to Nigerians that there are Boko Haram members in his cabinet, the Armed Forces and the police. Who therefore were the ex-heads of states Jonathan claimed were undermining his regime? Surely, as explained above, not General Buhari. And who among the rest – General Yakubu Gowon, Shehu Shagari, General Ibrahim Babangida and General Abdulsalami Abubakar? Sometime, someday, Jonathan himself would become ex-president and therefore would not consider it fair for his successor(s) to accuse him of sabotage without any evidence. Since Obasanjo left office in 1979, who succeeded or posed a threat to his record that he did not undermine?
He has this superiority complex and self-centredness that induce his idea that only he (among Nigerian leaders alive and dead) knows best. Everybody at one time or the other had been on Obasanjo’s list – Zik, Awo, Shagari, Buhari, Babangida, Abacha, Abdusalami Abubakar, the late Umaru Yar’Adua and now Goodluck Jonathan. Much as Jonathan can defend himself, there are aspects of such an exercise from which protocol might inhibit him. Such inhibition is therefore being brushed aside for the necessary critical assessment of Obasanjo’s latest multi-dimensional sting. First, Obasanjo went outside Nigeria in far away Senegal to warn that revolution by Nigerian youths was inevitable under Goodluck Jonathan unless the situation changed.
Two, Obasanjo ridiculed all efforts so far under the Jonathan regime to contain the Boko Haram insurgency. In the process, Obasanjo not only portrayed President Jonathan as weak but also prided himself (Obasanjo) with his crimes against humanity in Odi, (Bayelsa State) and Zaki Biam in Benue State. The third point on which Obasanjo, albeit indirectly, picked on Jonathan was that local governments should be granted complete fiscal autonomy from state government. In so doing, Obasanjo self-servingly created the impression that the political/constitutional anomaly between states and local governments was created by Goodluck Jonathan’s administration. On all these three issues, there is no way only Jonathan can be held responsible or that the controversies were not there unattended to throughout Obasanjo’s tenure from 1999 to 2007.
How much effort did Obasanjo make to solve any of the controversies on which he today pontificates? We must therefore go to the beginning of the story even if, for the purposes of argument, we concede that Jonathan is today in the saddle as the buck stops on his table. When Obasanjo was leaving office as a military ruler in 1979, his parting gift was that only a particular person would succeed him and another particular person would not succeed him. Since then, this particular strange mentality pervades our polity, such that even state governors now exhibit the same arrogance of insisting on who will succeed them, always a personal choice.
Such candidate is usually not necessarily the choice of the party and is always in defiance of the wishes of party members at state or federal level, even in states ruled by the opposition. Both the late President Umaru Yar’Adua and his running mate (now) President Goodluck Jonathan (earlier respectively as Governors of Katsina and Bayelsa states) never had further ambition but for Obasanjo who defied Nigeria and imposed both men on the country.
To worsen matters, when Yar’Adua was lying ill, the same Obasanjo callously at a public function in Abuja said Yar’Adua should know the honourable thing to do. In so doing, Obasanjo had ulterior motive but not in any way some love for Jonathan. Instead, Obasanjo was having it back at Yar’Adua who early in his regime, reversed some major decisions he inherited from Obasanjo. Equally when, on Yar’Adua’s death, Jonathan was weighing his options on whether to contest in 2011 or not, (as presidential candidate) the same Obasanjo forced Jonathan to contest, all with the hope of resuming his indirect rule of Nigeria through Jonathan.
Even early this year when Jonathan dared Nigerians by increasing fuel prices astronomically, protesters spread through Kaduna, Kano, Ibadan, PortHarcourt but most strategically in Lagos, and the nation came to a standstill. Jonathan was sweating virtually in regret of his decision. Eventually, who sabotaged Nigerian protesters? The same Obasanjo who in his notorious duplicity, employed his agents in a key media house to carry a report about him (Obasanjo) calling on Jonathan to save Nigeria. In actual fact, as protesters withdrew to refurbish their family with foodstuffs that weekend, it was Obasanjo who advised Jonathan to release heavily armed soldiers on venue of the peaceful protest. If therefore today, Jonathan merits criticism on his performance, such surely should not come from Obasanjo.
What is more, such criticisms are borne out of Obasanjo’s loss of influence and relevance in Jonathan’s administration. The impression should not be gained that Jonathan is necessarily being ungrateful to his benefactor. On the other hand, there is nothing in Obasanjo’s record to show him as ever grateful to any benefactor. Obasanjo’s inciting speech at Senegal on the prospects of revolution against Jonathan’s regime was the second time. He made the first speech, similar in content and purpose, at Geneva last time. No ex-head of state with unrestricted access to an incumbent should be seen in such posture.
A well-meaning Obasanjo should have given his critical observations to Jonathan in the privacy of Aso Rock. In another vein, portents of potential public revolt piled up under the rule of President Obasanjo with ministers and state governors reveling in the new atmosphere of impunity in stealing billions of naira and dollars of public funds. Till today, state governors and especially ministers who served under the Obasanjo regime are employing series of legal obstacles to escape jail terms for assets they cannot account. This is not to say such huge public funds are not being stolen by public office holders under the Jonathan regime. But such is a legacy from Obasanjo days.
Whatever is the situation today, why choose a foreign country to predict revolution in Nigeria? When they find themselves in that awkward situation, reputable world leaders sidestep the risk by requesting interests in such matters to be raised back in their home countries. Journalists did not even ask Obasanjo questions on situation in Nigeria. Rather, he went there to make a speech on the coming revolution in Nigeria. If any Nigerian journalist or civil rights activist had made such alarming statement, Nigerian secret police (SSS) would at best have stopped him on arrival back in Nigeria for some stupid interrogation or stop him at the airport when next he tries to travel out. Despite criticisms from many quarters, Jonathan should maintain the present carrot/stick policy of engaging the Boko Haram insurgents in possible dialogue while at the same time containing their violence.
No less insensitive was the attempt to play politics with the controversial issue of fiscal autonomy for local governments in the country. For the entire duration of his tenure of eight years as elected President, Obasanjo never thought of amending the constitution to provide for direct allocation of revenue to local councils from the Federation Account. Lately, the same Obasanjo was expressing his support for the financial autonomy of local governments. The impression was therefore wrongly created that either the Federal Government or President Goodluck Jonathan could unilaterally grant the autonomy to local governments. Towards that end, Obasanjo claimed that after all, the Federal Government does not withhold or tamper with revenue allocation to states.
How true from Obasanjo’s record as elected president? He withheld local government allocation from Lagos State government under Bola Tinubu as governor. Obasanjo’s grouse was that over 30 newly created local governments in Lagos State were unconstitutional. Lagos State government challenged Obasanjo’s unconstitutional act at the law courts up to Supreme Court, all of which ruled that Obasanjo had no right under the constitution to withhold any revenue allocation due to states or local governments. Notwithstanding those court rulings, Obasanjo refused to comply. When he left office in 2007, newly elected President Umaru Yar’Adua released the accumulated allocations to Lagos State government.
That is still the law till today and President Jonathan cannot unilaterally breach the constitution to by-pass state governments and release the revenue allocation to local governments. Should any revolution occur in Nigeria, nobody can predict the mode, magnitude, duration or potential victims/targets. But it must be noted that, for the umpteenth time, Obasanjo is in the forefront of prophets of doom and gloom.

Tussle Of The Dragons By Hannatu Musawa


Hannatu Musawa

All Nationals in a country are expected to look up to their Leaders as a source of guidance and inspiration. When there is an apparent rift in perceptions and ideals in ways to execute the mission and vision of a country’s agenda; there will be cracks in the harmony of national coexistence.
Former President Olusegun Obasanjo recently in Warri at a conference when a question was asked relating to the terrorist group Boko Haram, stated clearly that it was important for President Goodluck Jonathan to be decisive in tackling insecurity, as he himself did while tackling the militancy in Odi, Bayelsa State in 1999. After that statement was made the former Head of State, retired General Yakubu Gowon during the launch of a book, “Stay At The Top”, spoke against former President Obasanjo, saying he is “weak and highly irresponsible”. The book was written by a fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN), Omoniyi Komolafe. In what seems to be a war of words, former President Obasanjo fired on Saturday, 24th November, 2012 by stating through his spokesman, Malam Garba Deen Mohammed, “When did General Gowan become the spokesman of the Jonathan administration?” He further stated, “There’s nothing irresponsible about my comments on the insecurity in Nigeria. I was only interpreting the reality. I expressed an opinion on the way the Boko Haram crises is being handled and said if the current strategy is not working, then there has to be a change of strategy to achieve results. If the strategy were working, then there has to be a change of strategy to achieve results. If the strategy were working, Boko Haram would have become a thing of the past by now.”
For a country in desperate need of a decisive and positive anchor in leadership direction, both present and former leaders are expected to have common strategic objectives of fighting crime and corruption. The people expect distinctive competence while proficiently guiding them towards a more hopeful future. A highly educated society with ideals would be forced to eliminatepartiality of religion, ethnicity or regional diversity. Our leaders in Nigerian are no doubt Nigerians themselves, therefore our leaders are a reflection of what we ourselves are. A more objective assessment of our Nation’s public affairs would be more welcome in today’s society. The acclaimed writer, Chinua Achebe has said that Nigeria’s problems can be attributed to bad leadership. But can a country of 160 million claim to be pious and blame total corruption and insecurity on the government? The answer has to be no, for in us the people lies the solution to all our problems.
As leaders and followers we are collectively responsible for fairness, honesty and integrity. The laws of the land should be just and transparent. There should not be an encouragement of financial dictatorship by endorsing the powerful and wealthy to be even stronger; and this can be done with the imposition of an efficient tax system. Commendably, the Federal Inland Revenue Service has done a courageous job of collecting 3.5 trillion naira in 2012 alone. The law enforcement agencies need to be restructured. Instead of pointing accusing fingers at security forces for not doing their jobs properly, why not replace that criticism with a system that rewards officers for preventing any form of criminal activity taking place while they are on duty? Major changes and reforms should take place with a specific emphasis on economic activity while encouraging consumer demand and job creation. Essential infrastructures such as roads, ports, schools, hospitals, and information technology machinery should be prioritized. The rebranding and rebuilding of Nigeria’s seemingly lost glory should be achieved passionately, with a sense of great national pride. A solid legacy should be left for the future generation of Nigerians to come.
After the advent of the oil boom in the 1970’s, Nigeria’s ranking in the world has declined considerably. Nigeria is faced with numerous economic problems including a serious decline in its agricultural sector and a claustrophobic external debt situation; one that seems to be mounting. According to the World Bank Economic Review,“ While some decline in nonoil traded goods sector reflects efficient adjustment to the oil boom, policy with regards to public expenditure, exchange rates, pricing, and the trade regime could exacerbate such decline and impede readjustments as the boom subsides.”
Nigeria is the largest producer of oil in sub- Saharan Africa and a member of OPEC since 1971. Yet appallingly, Nigeria has the third highest number of poor people in the world, after China and India. We are plagued by low levels of human development (two out of five children are stunted in growth), regional, religious and social conflicts as well as environmental challenges. It has become apparent that the vast natural resources at Nigeria’s disposal have apparently not advanced human development at all. The discovery of crude should have afforded Nigeria an advantageous opportunity to generate national income and the living standards of its people much improved.
Leadership is a continually evolving responsibility that requires creativity and positive energy; with certain principals and techniques adopted as tools to manage people and the economy. The most valuable aspect of its economy are its human resources. These human resource capability factors relate to the possession and use of human resources especially specified skills that have a bearing on the economic capacity and ability to implement productive strategies. Relevant factors include extensive manpower planning, public corporate image, quality of public office holders and public/civil servants, union managements and relations, employment, and importantly the satisfaction and moral of the people.
My fellow Nigerians should be empowered and motivated to achieve common goals for the good of the country as a whole. Transparent leadership recognizes the strengths and weaknesses of their people. They strengthen the weaknesses and build on the strengths. The society must be educated enough to share information for the sake of nation building. We want to follow and trust our leaders to lead us on the right path to follow. Mistakes are made by all nations of the world but Nigeria desperately needs to acknowledge its short comings and highlight them in the most plausible way. The reality of the situation of Nigeria today is a far cry from the qualities listed above.
All past Heads of States and Presidents of this great nation have contributed various positive policies to build Nigeria. The passion of Nigerians should be engaged to deliver on the core values of our founding fathers. John Maxwell has defined leadership as influence. The trust in entirety of the past and present leaders by Nigerians is a burden they have to bear. There is no room for the breach of that trust, neglecting transparency or the compromise of integrity via a failure to act positively or the unwholesome practices of unethical violations.
The pride of our leaders should be ignored for innovative implementations to achieve success. We are ideally to be committed by one common goal: The security, economic strength and pride of national sovereignty of all Nigerians. But when the influential leaders of the giant of Africa are engaged in a caustic public display of accusatory words, it does little for the moral of a desperate society other than highlight the tussle of the dragons.
Saharareporters

Breaking News: Court dismisses suit seeking to know how Babangida spent $12.4bn Gulf oil windfall


By Nnenna Ibeh
Ibrahim BabangidaIbrahim Babangida
 The government said the Pius Okigbo report is missing.
A Federal High Court in Abuja has dismissed the suit filed by civil society groups against the Attorney General of the Federation, AGF, and the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN.
The judge, Gabriel Kolawole, delivered the ruling on Thursday in Abuja. He said the applicants lack the locus standi to institute the case.
Mr. Kolawole however said the plaintiffs should not be seen as busy bodies but patriotic citizens.
Six civil society groups, including the Socio-Economic and Accountability Project (SERAP), sued the Attorney- General of the Federation (AGF) and the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) over the much publicised $12.4 billion oil windfall, which the country recorded between 1988 and 1992, while former military dictator, Ibrahim Babangida, was in power.
The groups wanted the court to compel the government to release a report of a probe panel headed by Pius Okigbo which probed the spending of the money by the government.
The Federal Government raised many arguments against the suit including: that the report was missing, only the AGF could demand for such a report, and the court had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit.
LibertyReport

Babalakin Sells EFCC a Dummy, Obtains Court Order Stopping His Arraignment While Lawyer Fakes His “Illness” In Another Court


Lagos high court filled up by lawyers and journalist waiting in vain for Babalakin to arrive for arraignment
By SaharaReporters, New York
SaharaReporters has learned that while businessman Wale Babalakin’s lawyer was telling one court today that he was too ill to appear in court, he was in the Federal High Court in Lagos obtaining an administrative injunction to prevent the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) from laying a finger on him or infringing on his ‘fundamental’ rights.
A federal high court judge in Lagos granted Babalakin’s wishes, and coincidentally or conveniently adjourned further hearing in the case to coincide with the EFCC’s new adjourned date of arraignment of Babalakin for allegedly laundering of N2 billion for the former Delta State Governor, James Ibori, to December 12.
Earlier today at  a Lagos high court Babalakin, the embattled chairman of Bi-Courtney Construction Company, was to be charged with using such business associates as Stabilini Visinoni Limited, Alex Okoh and Renix Nigeria Limited, to launder funds for the former governor
Babalakin’s counsel, Bolaji Ayorinde SAN, who represented Stabilini Visinoni Limited and Bi-Courtney Limited respectively, gave the excuse that his client fell ill suddenly and was admitted in a hospital and was therefore unable to appear in court for his arraignment.   The second defendant, Alex Okoh, was however present in the court room.
In a 27-count charge, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) alleged that Mr. Babalakin and his associates, including Bi-Courtney construction group, Stabilini, Renix Nigeria Limited, and a certain Alex Okoh, expedited the fund transfers through Mauritius under the ploy that the funds were for a construction contract for Delta State.
The EFCC charged, among others, that between the months of May and December 2006, Wale Babalakin corruptly conferred over N1.3billion to the benefit of former Governor James Ibori through various third parties to Erin Aviation Account in Mauritius for the purchase of a Challenger Jet Aircraft.
In what suggests he is a front man for Ibori, Babalakin coordinated Stabilini Visioni and Bi-Courtney to separately launder huge funds for the former governor.
The anti-graft commission also said the sum of $500,000; $1million and $1.5m were laundered through Interactive Technologies Limited/ TN FOCUS.   Through SOPETROL OIL and GAS LIMITED, the sum of $1m was said to have also been transferred. Another HYUNDAI HEAVY INDUSTRIES was used to transfer a sum of $2m, where all stated transfers were made on behalf of Ibori to an Erin Aviation account in Mauritius. The EFCC alleged that Babalakin and his fingered associates were aware that those funds were as a result of criminal conduct on the part of Ibori.
SaharaReporters investigations show that there were communications between the EFCC and Mr. Babalakin on November 26th when he briefly showed up at the Abuja offices of the EFCC, he was then granted and administrative bail with the suspect assuring the commission of compliance to appear for arraignment today, and with no reference to any medical condition.
After the court session today, the EFCC counsel, Rotimi Jacobs, told journalists that although it was not abnormal for human beings to be sick, it was worrisome for one to fall ill ‘overnight’ without previous symptoms.
Mr. Jacobs promised that the anti-graft agency would find out what illness may have suddenly befallen the first defendant, Mr. Babalakin, in the case of fraud and collusion with Mr. Ibori, who is himself serving a jail term in the United Kingdom.
As it turns out, Babalakin was in another courtroom, manipulating Nigeria’s corrupt and convoluted legal system, which protects and provides for the wealthy, to protect and provide for himself.
Ten days ago, the federal government terminated its agreement with Mr. Babalakin’s Bi-Courtney for the construction of the Lagos-Ibadan expressway, which was given to the company in mid-2009, citing the failure of the company to fulfill its agreements on the construction.  The reconstruction was then divided between two companies: Julius Berger Plc and R.C.C Nigeria Limited.
 

Police Pension: Reps Threaten To Order Okonjo-Iweala’s Arrest

The House of Representatives, yesterday, threatened to issue a warrant of arrest against the Minister of Finance, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, over her refusal to honour invitations from its Committee on Pensions.
Laughing at the Reps?
Members of the committee also want the Finance Minister to explain her role in the take-over of Police Pension Fund and non-payment of pensions to retired officers and men of the Nigerian Police Force.
Chairman of the Committee on Pension, Ibrahim Kamba, read the decision of the committee after waiting for the minister for several hours without any apology for non-appearance.
He noted that it was obvious that the minister was not ready to appear to explain why the ministry took over Police Pension office without regard to Pension Reform Act.
“We have been inviting the Minister of Finance over the problems of police pension. She has been holding the police pension and several police pensioners have died due to non-payment despite the fact that the National Assembly appropriated money in the 2012 fiscal year.
“Following her refusal, the committee is going to issue a warrant of arrest against the minister if she fails to attend the next meeting.
“We are going to give her a last opportunity. She has no right to neglect the summons of the committee. Many former IGs have not been paid. Sunday Ehindero and Sunday Adewusi and DIG Akeredolu have not been listed due to the take-over by the minister.
“We want to make the reason for our action clear to Nigerians. We hate playing with peoples’ lives. We have received some petitions from the police that many police pensioners are not paid.”
InformationNigeria.org