Saturday 22 February 2014

Nigeria’s Overhyped And Uncoordinated Minister Of The Economy By Samuel O. Oluyemi


Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala
  • 99
     
    Share
In 2011, I had the privilege of writing a letter to the recently returned Finance Minister, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, on behalf of my boss. Despite being meticulously prepared, the letter was returned back for corrections. Astonishingly, the new Minister was refusing to read any letter that was not addressed to the “Coordinating Minister of the Economy.” To me, it seemed more like a desperate power grab by a barely literate politician than the behaviour one would expect of a Harvard-trained, internationally acclaimed economist, although I was reluctant to make that judgement at the time. Yet, this claim has been confirmed over time and is now common knowledge to civil servants who have had any recent contact with the Nigerian Finance Ministry.
Without a doubt, Madam Okonjo-Iweala has been a source of pride to Nigeria. She has broken the glass ceiling for Africans in general and women in particular. She has inspired us, Nigerian professionals, to believe that with hard work, dedication and some luck it is possible to rise to the highest echelons of a global institution and to occupy coveted positions in our country. For that we are grateful.
However, since that incident in 2011, it has become evident that something has radically changed about the Ngozi of the 2004-2007 era – the effective technocrat who was instrumental in negotiating Nigeria’s debt relief and passionately pursued President Olusegun Obasanjo’s reform agenda. With each passing day, it appears that the hitherto respectable World Bank economist has stopped trying to beat the bad guys, but has joined them. Before our eyes, Ngozi’s metamorphosis into a frighteningly egocentric, corruption-condoning and limelight-hugging Nigerian politician is almost complete. She adds to these, a uniquely dark skill of hoodwinking the international media. While Nigerians groan, Ngozi is celebrated abroad, interviewed by international magazines and sits smug on the plush seats at Davos pontificating on her achievements in Nigeria.
It is high time the international agencies and the media see beyond the facade of Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala’s past glories for what she has now become. These are not unsubstantiated claims of some imaginary opponents, but a factual submission from one who used to passionately defend and support her actions. My submission is centred on four broad reasons which are: (1) Mismanagement of the Nigerian economy (2) Vindictiveness and intolerance of criticism (3) Emotional manipulation of the international media (4) Overambitious personalisation of Nigeria’s reform agenda.
ECONOMIC MISMANAGEMENT
The Control and Management of the public finances of the Federation is the broad mandate of the Finance Ministry. This mandate cut across all sectors of the Nigerian economy, including budget preparation, designing fiscal and monetary policies and monitoring the country’s oil and non-oil revenue among others. Given these already enormous responsibilities, the only justification to assume a title of Coordinating Minister of the Economy (CME) would be to intimidate fellow ministers and possibly take over the role of the Ministry of National Planning which Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala has effectively done.
Unfortunately, high sounding titles have not led to high quality delivery of her mandates. Take the national budget for example; this single most important policy document of government has become a source of national disgrace – tardily prepared, overbloated, and un-implementable. The current 2014 budget estimates signed off by Ngozi and submitted to the National Assembly include desktop computers for the Ministry of Education at N2 million each (over $13,000) and an allocation to Niger Delta militants of N54 billion, much higher than cumulative spending for Nigeria’s army, air force and navy.
One would assume the job description of a ‘coordinating minister’ includes providing a coherent and realistic budget for the government. Apparently not. Where budgets have passed, government Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) have been crippled by consistent lack of releases. Expenditure warrants are sent in with no cash backing hampering the abilities of MDAs to implement projects in a timely manner and government contractors become overdressed beggars in Ministries, chasing their own resources. Dr. Precious Gbeneol, Special Adviser to President Jonathan on the MDGs, in a presentation in 2013 identified haphazard releases of the Finance Ministry as most responsible for Nigeria’s inability to achieve the MDGs. The impact is worse at the state level, with frequent stalemates at the Federal Account Allocation Committee (FAAC). Frivolous charges, unaccounted drops in revenue and archaic accounting systems from key revenue generators make a mockery of the entire revenue sharing process.
Nigeria’s rising debt profile, declining foreign reserves and depleting Excess Crude Account (ECA) will puzzle any keen watcher of the nation’s finances. In a time of booming global oil prices, the country’s financial indicators point downwards. The ECA – an aberration to the constitution has been maintained by the Federal Government due to economic arguments put forth by Mrs. Iweala has become a slush fund for managing political tensions between the Presidency and State governments. With a balance of about $11.5 billion in December 2012, the ECA has now declined to less than $2.5 billion as at January 17, 2014! Indeed, Nigeria’s financial accounts have a direct inverse relationship to political upheavals. If you doubt this, pay close attention to the above three indicators next time Governor Amaechi calls a meeting of the Nigeria Governors Forum, or House Speaker Aminu Tambuwal is reportedly in a meeting with the opposition. That the Finance Minister could be blatantly dipping into the nation’s resources to support political interventions is unprofessional and unbecoming. For Dr. Okonjo-Iweala to claim no knowledge that this is happening would be admitting ineptitude.
The Minister, and her aides, are quick to point to the impressive growth rates of Nigeria’s economy as evidence of her economic prowess. However anyone bothering to do a month’s research at the National Bureau of Statistics would exercise caution in subscribing to these claims. The Nigerian economy has grown in spite of the actions of the Minister and not because of any targeted policy action resulting from the ‘brilliance’ of Mrs. CME. A deep analysis into the drivers of growth limits any attribution to policies of the Finance Ministry. The economy has grown because of the hard work of Nigerians who have developed a knack for succeeding against all odds despite the artificial obstacles frequently put in their way- a key example being Nollywood. The non-oil sectors seem to be rising faster than the oil sector due to a drop in oil production and rampant oil theft rather than any conscious diversification policy. In fact rather than provide growth generating policies, the Finance ministry has focused on protecting entrenched interests and de-industrialising key sectors. It is poignant to note that the Nigeria Customs Authority recently raised the alarm that the country had lost over N1.7 trillion ($10.3 billion) to the retrogressive waivers granted by the Finance Ministry. Waivers have been granted for frivolous items including bullet proof luxury cars, religious books and kitchen utensils signed off by Minister Okonjo-Iweala disregarding the real sectors that require them.
Perhaps the most damning indication of Ngozi’s uncoordinated incompetence is the ongoing saga of an unaccounted $20 billion oil revenues from the oil corporation, the NNPC. That the Finance minister can go to bed at night knowing that this heist happened under her watch and she has still not resigned or been jailed is a uniquely Nigerian anomaly. Ngozi’s culpability has drawn ire even from former close friends. Past World Bank Vice President and member of Nigeria’s economic team during the Obasanjo years, Madam Oby Ezekwesili has publicly criticized Madam Iweala’s role in the unremitted funds. As a Minister of Finance, Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala is mandated to “monitor the oil and non-oil revenue of the country” for which she has failed woefully. Her added role as coordinating Minister surely goes even further! That a coordinating Minister would be unaware of such colossal losses reeks of incompetence. And surely Ngozi is not incompetent, or is she? Well she is either incapable of her job or was in the know and thus culpable.
VINDICTIVENESS AND INTOLERANCE OF CRITICISM
Over the course of her work, Dr. Okonjo Iweala has gained a notorious reputation for taking no prisoners. She ferociously hunts anyone who questions her methods or sincerity. In 2013, after writing a less than flattering article on the Minister, Yushau Shuaibu got an unexpected call from the Ngozi herself- a rare honour on the wrong issue- she proceeded to dress him down. A few weeks later, Mr. Shuaibu was summarily dismissed from a 25 year civil service career, for daring to speak out on the all-powerful Minister, he is currently in court challenging this Sicilian style retribution. In-country journalists have subsequently gotten the hint, with only a few brave reporters still going down this path. Similarly, several Nigerians who dared ask her probing questions at international events have reported receiving a scathing tongue-lashing from her.
EMOTIONAL MANIPULATION
So intolerant is she about critical reports by Nigerian newspapers that in a recent TEDx talk delivered in London, rather than the inspirational speech participants were expecting, Dr.  Iweala dragged the young audience to the gutters of Nigerian politics. She went off on a tangent ranting against the Nigerian media, particularly The Punch for attacking her personally and for being opposed to reform because the media dared to question her questionable waivers. For theatrical effect, she reminded listeners that even her mother was kidnapped by powerful anti-reform vested interests although the kidnappers as widely reported were her father’s former staff. Alas this was quintessential Ngozi at her Nollywood best, playing the victim yet again!
In a recent parliamentary inquiry at Nigeria’s energetic House of Representatives, Ngozi’s acting skills were in full display as she tried to emotionally blackmail the committee, accusing them of being disrespectful, to the extent of releasing a doctored clip of the proceedings. Were it not for the original longer clip available from Premium Times, what really happened would have been obscured. Her propaganda machinery even went as far as playing the gender-discrimination card against the all-male committee. Thankfully, most Nigerians who followed the incident refused to fall for the trickery.
An effective manipulation strategy perfected by Ngozi is a pre-emptive mentioning of corruption in order to project the image of one who identifies the problem first. She does this when she senses a growing momentum by the public against corruption acts which she otherwise condones. This has happened on at least three occasions including the fuel subsidy corruption saga, ongoing oil theft and most recently at the TEDx talk in London, she alluded to corruption in elections financing. By mentioning such an issue to the press, for instance, giving estimates of 400,000 barrels of crude oil stolen daily, Ngozi cleverly distances herself from acts she deliberately overlooks, while creating an erroneous public perception that she is the lone and ‘brave reformer’ swimming against the tide of rancid venality.
One wonders why Dr. Okonjo-Iweala is so ruthless about projecting this squeaky clean super hero image to the detriment of free speech. The answer lies in who Dr. Okonjo-Iweala actually considers her constituents. With growing disdain for the ordinary Nigerians, professionals and even her ministerial colleagues, Ngozi has always found it easier to mingle and profess her ‘love’ for Nigeria, with the international community. She spares no time or resources in attending any conference at Harvard, New York, Davos or Oxford explaining her lone efforts to ‘reform’ Nigeria. Yet, she is hardly seen communicating her policies at the University of Ibadan, Ahmadu Bello University, and the Lagos Business School not to mention everyday Nigerians.
Consequently, Ngozi has invested significant resources ruthlessly suppressing any adverse news reports that could be seen by the international community. A well-oiled and cunning propaganda machinery run with her media assistant, Paul Nwabuikwu as the front, and a network of highly paid international media consultants at the back room, assures that the true picture of Madam Okonjo-Iweala is hardly seen.
OVERAMBITIOUS PERSONALISATION OF NIGERIA’S REFORM AGENDA
With a consistent knack for wanting to outshine the master, Ngozi seems to have forgotten Robert Greene’s first law of power. This is perhaps the single reason why former President Obasanjo summarily dispatched her to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in 2006. With the current administration, she has carved a niche for being first to claim the glory on any positive initiatives at the expense of other hardworking colleagues and quickly distancing herself from any negatives. This personal policy of fair-weathered friendship leaves the President vulnerable to consistent scorn from Nigerians and the international community while Ngozi scoops up all accolades.
Even more indicative of Ngozi’s crass opportunism is the recent revelation in a book by former FCT Minister Nasir El-rufai in which he details how Dr. Okonjo-Iweala flew into Abuja all the way from Washington DC hoping to become General Buhari’s running mate in the 2011 elections- to run against President Jonathan. Shortly after that episode, she was appointed as Nigeria’s Finance Minister. No sooner did she have this post however, than she was scheming to be President of the World Bank, expending Nigeria’s financial and political capital for her own personal gains.
Effectively therefore, being Nigeria’s CME is second choice, reaffirming her superiority to ordinary Nigerians and her Ministerial colleagues. Her next move is rumoured to be a bid for the Presidency of the African Development Bank, a position also being eyed by outgoing Governor of the Central Bank, Sanusi Lamido with some believing the ongoing altercation between the two is a proxy war for this upcoming contest.
CONCLUSION
I have found myself frequently asking if this is the same Ngozi we admired on the pages of newspapers between 2004 and 2007 or whether all along the power-hungry, egoistic and vindictive Nigerian politician she tries so hard to distance herself from is her true self. In searching for answers I picked up the Minister’s latest book on her experiences during the Obasanjo years titled “Reforming the Unreformable”- ignoring that the title itself reeked of arrogant self-promotion. Reading through, I realised the preponderance of the word “I”. A word search astonishingly showed over 5,000 mentions of the word “I” in the book. It’s amazing that anyone who led an economic “team” could be so self-absorbed. I also recalled that Ngozi’s one condition for joining the Obasanjo government was how to maintain her World Bank salary to which subsequently her Nigerian salaries were dollarized, and that of joining President Goodluck’s cabinet was that she would be “Coordinating Minister.” I wondered why her condition would not be a tolerance for zero corruption, or that as mandated by the constitution, all revenues must be paid to federation account. As President Jonathan’s first term, comes to an end, and possibly the end of his administration as well, this will hopefully be Minister Ngozi’s last ditch attempt at using Nigeria to build her international profile. We will wish her good luck in her departure and what will surely be the title of her next book; “Coordinating the Uncoordinate-able”
NewsRescue

Interesting times

Interesting times
Lamido Sanusi & Okonjo Iweala

 by: GBENGA OMOTOSO

MANY were caught unawares by the President’s whistle-stop tour of palaces in the Southwest last weekend. I wasn’t. The only problem was the oversight – I don’t want to believe it is a deliberate slight – of leaving my beautiful town out of the presidential itinerary. Serene and seductive, Ada in the state of Osun offers a refreshing balm against the chaos of the city.
Dr Goodluck Jonathan said the visits were private. Not quite, many said. Some swore they were a prelude to his soon – to –be – announced plan to run in the 2015 election. The traditional rulers too have kept their discussions with the President as secret as possible. But, dear reader, today’s column is not about the presidential sorties to palaces. No. There are more urgent matters that are in no way secret but in all ways critical. Grave.
As Dr Jonathan sought royal endorsements in the politically savvy Southwest – its leading lights could sometimes be naive – the deadly Boko Haram sect was busy in Konduga, a hitherto unknown Borno State village that is now a testimony to the devastating blow that Boko Haram has dealt our military muscle, killing residents and razing homes. No fewer than 106 died. I don’t remember a presidential condemnation of the dastardly act. I guess the President is tired of issuing those statements of consolation- that our hearts are with those who lost their loved ones – and defiance – that we won’t surrender to the Boko Haram terror machine. The sect struck again yesterday in Bama, Borno State. Needless to say, it was bloody. Whichever way we look at it, it is sad that blood, human blood keeps flowing and we all are helpless. So sad.
Who are Boko Haram’s sponsors? Where are their weapons coming from? What are Nigeria’s neighbours doing to help? Are they collaborators in this long festival of horror? How effective has been the Air Force in this war? Can we in all sincerity claim that our soldiers are well equipped and well motivated? How did it happen that Boko Haram trampled on Konduga for five hours and no help came to the beleaguered village? The insurgents use unconventional tactics, but is that enough to justify the horrific harvest of deaths and broken limbs? We may never find answers to these questions.
But, it has not all been a bloody affair. Those pushing for the sack of Ms Stella Oduah as Aviation minister carried the day. She got the boot. Now, the woman of exquisite taste has the chance to lash her traducers, those censorious champions of morality who felt N255m was too much to spend on bulletproof cars for the protection of a woman who is not just a minister but a princess. Ms Oduah will now, a source who admires her monstrous but highly maligned airports transformation project said, ride in more expensive cars – to the shame of all those who called her a spendthrift.
Besides, our amiable lady will have time to think about her memoirs. The work, those who know her closely have said, will be an invaluable companion of first class managers, including those who must learn how to survive in a hopelessly stifling corporate environment that is immersed in both national and domestic politics. A likely title? Well, The odyssey of a Princess.
Now that President Jonathan has named Brig.-Gen Jones Oladehinde Arogbofa as his Chief of Staff, Chief E. K. Clark and Raypower proprietor Raymond Alegho Dokpesi can catch their breath. Just because some newspapers speculated that Dokpesi was among those being considered for the job, Clark launched into a rage, vowing to ensure that Dokpesi did not get it. Dokpesi fought back, pouring invectives on the old man. It was messy. But then, what else do you get when a high chief is battling to become a chief of staff and a chief is dying to stop him. So much for cheap chiefs.
The battle of chiefs isn’t the only show in Abuja. Until last week, many thought the national conference was a mere joke. Some, including the sagacious Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, saw it as pure subterfuge in the 2015 battle. To others, it was another chance to get on board the cruise ship for a jamboree. Then, the government announced the financial package for the talk shop –N7billion – and everybody is now struggling to be a delegate. No doubt this will rank among the world’s most expensive talk shows. Long after the delegates must have gone to celebrate their fortune –pot bellies, chubby cheeks and all – Nigerians and their friends will still be talking about the cash that got sunk into this revelry that is expected to resolve this country’s problems once and for all. But then, is talk –any talk – cheap? Ask the mobile telephone firms and their clients.
Unknown to many, also in Abuja, the centenary anniversary celebration has been on. Not much attention has been paid to this show, perhaps because delegates are not being selected and the per diem not announced as it was clearly proclaimed for national conference attendees. The cash, we have been told, will come from the private sector. Good. Nigerians love shows. A private sector struggling to create jobs and crying like a baby because of the huge cost of doing business – diesel, haulage, duties and others – has suddenly found the cash for Nigeria’s biggest party this year. Secretary to the Government of the Federation Anyim Pius Anyim announced gleefully yesterday that 28 world leaders would join the celebration. What a feat.
So much for jamborees. Some serious business. Is $20billion oil money missing? Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) says the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) should explain where the cash is gone. Besides, he alleges that NNPC has been hurling cash into kerosene subsidy when there is a presidential directive that it shouldn’t do so. Finance Minister Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala – many wonder if she is actually ministering onto the economy – says forensic auditors should be called in. NNPC says because the presidential order was not in a gazette, it carried on subsidising kerosene, even as queues for the commodity lengthen at filling stations and prices keep soaring. If at the level of the Finance Ministry we can’t find somebody to do the arithmetic, then we are in real trouble. Besides, the kerosene thing smells like a scam, a highly combustible scam scrounged off the public till. Whichever way the matter goes, Sanusi doesn’t deserve the blows he is getting; he has raised issues of probity. We demand answers. Simple.
Poor David Mark. The Senate President seems to be confused on the matter of the senators who dumped the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) for the opposition All Progressives Congress (APC). The PDP insists that he should declare the senators’ seats vacant. The senators demand that their letter to the Senate be read out, loud and clear, to seal their defection. Mark says the matter is sub judice. Clever guy. There is no way the PDP can force these fellows to stay with it. They are gone – body and soul. A man should be allowed to keep the company he likes. Isn’t this a basic principle of human right? Besides, what is democracy all about if not the right to have a choice and to exercise such a choice anywhere, anytime, so long as the exercise of such a choice does not impugn other people’s rights? A battered wife should get a divorce. More so as there is no demand for alimony.
It is just about two weeks since Police Commissioner Mbu Joseph Mbu left Rivers State. And the expeditious effect has been so soothing. Not a single shot has been fired at innocent people gathering for peaceful purposes. Projects are being commissioned and governance is back in full swing. Mbu, a garrulous officer who brooks no criticism, became part of the crises of power and suspicion in Rivers. The more he proclaimed his professionalism, the deeper he got immersed in the murky waters of politics.
Now that those who wanted him out have their prize, Mbu should spare a thought for his future. I assure him Abuja is easier to police. There is little politics. The Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) will find Mbu useful in enforcing the much abused Abuja master plan. He will also be busy chasing vendors off the street in the day and laying ambush for women of easy virtue in the night.
From the Boko Haram madness, unnecessary revelries and hazardous economics to political complexities, one fact is clear: we are in interesting times.
TheNation

Monday 3 February 2014

Nigeria2015: I don’t mind sacrificing my ambition for APC’s growth – Atiku


Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar
Atiku says Nigeria is in dire need of change.
A former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, said on Monday in Sokoto that he would sacrifice his ambition for the growth of his new party, the All Progressives Congress, APC.
Mr. Abubakar made the declaration when he paid a courtesy call on the governor of Sokoto State, Aliyu Wamakko.
“All of us are now willing to set aside our individual ambitions so as to build a formidable APC,” he said. “So, for now, we are not talking about how to pursuing our selfish political aspirations. We are collectively working to ensure the growth of the APC.”
Mr. Abubakar announced on Sunday that he dumped Nigeria’s ruling Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, for the opposition party.
He said he defected to the APC after nationwide consultations with his political associates.
“Over 80 per cent of my political supporters are in support of my defection to the APC,” he added.
The former vice president said that Nigeria was in dire need of change, and commended the people of Sokoto State for rallying behind him always. He stated that he got the highest number of votes from the state delegates during the 2011 PDP presidential primaries, when he challenged and lost the party’s ticket to President Goodluck Jonathan.
The former vice president, 1999- 2007, said the APC leadership was committed to building a strong and united party.
Responding, Mr. Wamakko said that the APC’s struggle was aimed at salvaging the North and Nigeria in general. The governor urged leaders of the party to put Nigeria first and not their individual ambitions.
“I am appealing to you not to repeat the costly blunders of 2011 in order to achieve our vision and mission of salvaging Nigeria,” he added. Mr. Wamakko said that such patriotism and political sagacity were required to build a stronger APC that would emerge victorious in 2015. He said that Nigerians needed a united country where the citizens are equal stakeholders.
“Good governance cannot thrive where there is no social justice and respect for the rule of law. Nobody should be seen to be above the law, and corruption must be squarely tackled without minding whose ox is gored,” he said.
Mr. Wamakko said that God did not make a mistake by creating Nigerians with diverse religious and ethnic differences.
Although he is yet to announce his ambition, Mr. Abubakar is expected to challenge other potential aspirants for the presidential ticket of the APC in 2015. Apart from challenging President Jonathan for the PDP ticket in 2011, Mr. Abubakar had in 2007 contested for president on the platform of the defunct Action Congress, after leaving the PDP a year earlier. He lost the election to the PDP’s candidate, late President Umaru Yar’Adua. He later rejoined the PDP in 2009.

PremiumTimes

A MUST READ: Aliyu Gusau and other Untouchables ♦ by Rudolf Okonkwo

gusau-parliament



  • 16
     
    Share



rescuedBehind every throne, the philosopher says, there is something bigger than the King. The Nigerian presidency is a throne presently occupied by Olusegun Obasanjo. But behind that throne are people who are bigger than the King. None of them has been on the spotlight lately as Lt.-General Aliyu Mohammed Gusau. He belongs to the exclusive club of the Nigerian untouchables. Currently, he is under attack by a section of the Nigerian media and he is fighting back with great fury. And when an untouchable fights back, it is not a pretty sight.
Mohammed Gusau is Nigeria’s National Security Adviser. He was the Chief of Army Staff during Shonekan’s Interim National Government of 1993. Just like many people around Obasanjo, he has been on Nigeria’s political scene for a while. He was a royal friend of Babangida who was retired by Abacha. He is credited to be the man who “sold” Obasanjo to the north. Before Gen. Babangida paid the famous courtesy call to Otah farm, General Gusau was the forerunner.
As the National Security Adviser, General Gusau is one of the most powerful people in Nigeria. He knows what ordinary Nigerians do not know. He is in control of both the military and civilian intelligence network, so he can make things happen. And he does with impunity. He knows who is writing fake checks and who is wearing dirty underwear. He knows who is sleeping with another man’s wife and who is stealing Nigeria’s money. He knows a lot. Obviously, more than the King, Obasanjo knows. That is why he is something behind the throne that is bigger than the King.
A foreign Spy in Nigeria, NSA Gusau plotted for the US against the serving Nigerian president
A foreign Spy in Nigeria, NSA Gusau plotted for the US against the serving Nigerian president
One of his special assignments in this current administration is the recovery of public funds stolen from Nigeria’s treasury by past governments. Whether that assignment includes looking at the activities of his friend Babangida from 1983 – 1993, we may never know. By all indication, Gusau is on the heals of the Abachas. Like everything Nigeria, Gusau’s problems seem to be coming from all the complications that follows anyone who ever dined with the devil. And in his case, he dined with a short spoon.
As Nigeria’s security agencies uncover loots and fingerprints, the Nigerian press uncovers footprints. Sometimes, the footprints of the untouchable are seen in areas where the devil stepped on. Which is not totally unexpected considering the fact that the untouchables have the habit of hanging around the devils. In defense of the Nigerian press, the press like the police does little profiling. It also believes that birds of the same feather flock together. The press thinks there is no smoke without fire. That is the premise from which the press begins to work until stories are confirmed and published or unconfirmed and discarded. So it is not difficult to understand why a sector of the Nigerian press will begin by labeling Gusau as the ring leader of the cabal trying to impose Obasanjo on Nigeria and ended up calling him the principal actor trying to destabilize Obasanjo’s administration.
As time goes on, Nigerians are beginning to discover that the man Babangida embraced is more dangerous than the man Abacha did. I would first have as heroes, men Babangida rejected before I accept those Abacha rejected. Abacha was crude, evil and insane. He surrounded himself with sycophantic fools who displayed their pathetic ignorance. The same could not be said of Babangida. He was tactical, evil and cancerous. He surrounded himself with intelligent idiots who displayed their criminal foolishness. In the long run, it would be proved that friends of Babangida did more damage to Nigeria than friends of Abacha. Abacha’s men took away our cash but Babangida’s men took away our cash and something more expensive- our soul.
So the tragedy of General Gusau goes back to the tragedy of his master, Babangida. Like most men around Obasanjo, he came in with heavy luggage and it is beginning to wear him down. Surrounding himself with a legion of untouchables was Obasanjo’s first mistake. Those Warren Christophers of Nigeria, those Henry Kissingers of Nigeria who ought to have retired into private life are busy parading themselves along Nigeria’s corridors of power with all their luggage as the untouchables. The Asiodus, the Ciromas, the Ogbemudias. Men, whose names I learnt in Social Studies classes in primary school are the same names that my children would be learning. And it wasn’t that they did such a wonderful job in the past to warrant a return journey. When Babangida brought in Philip Asiodu to serve in his Interim Government, the press asked Asiodu how he felt about the enormous task facing him. Asiodu told the press it was just a routine assignment.
gusau-kano2To the untouchables, the Nigeria project is just a routine assignment. They have been there, and they have done that. On pieces of papers where Nigeria’s money were signed away, their signatures abound. They know the system very well. They have traveled the road many times. They are well connected. They were there when it all began. There is nothing really that anybody can do to them. They can blackmail. They can open a can of worm nobody wants to open. They can pull the right strings and people will start falling down. Yes, they can. They have all the apparatus of state power in their hand. Each day the untouchables spend around the corridors of power, they are busy covering their footprints.
Mr. Nduka Obaigbena, publisher of ThisDay newspaper now knows what it means to look for and discover the footprint of an untouchable along the unholy path of Nigeria’s public life. The paper has the audacity to pursue stories about possible links between Aliyu Mohammed Gusau’s Paris account and the loots recovered from the Sani Abacha family. They were looking at possible kick-backs in the 12 billion naira paid to Julius Berger before Obasanjo visited Germany and if it is responsible for the current in-fighting between government officials. The paper was also looking at Vice-president Atiku’s claim that retired Generals were behind Sharia crises.
How dare you ask questions about the untouchables? For that reason, Obaigbena has to explain to the State security Service (SSS) the circumstances behind an unsettled bill of $23, 407.39 owed to Marriott Wardman park Hotel, in Washington DC during IMF/World Bank meeting with Nigerian officials in DC. Mr. Obaigbena has since stepped aside as the publisher and Editor-in-Chief of ThisDay while he fights to clear his name. He would be fighting amongst others, the National Council on Privatization (NCP) who he claimed owe his company, Leaders and Company Limited $150,000 for co-ordinating dinner/briefing of the 1999 World bank/IMF annual meeting held at Marriott Wardman park House.
If there is a non-criminal way of qualifying Abacha’s name with the word credit, it is in relation to the untouchables. Abacha, in his brutal nature, showed no respect for the untouchable. He dethroned Alhaji Ibrahim Dasuki. He put Obasanjo in jail- something Babangida only dreamt of. He also put Yaradua in jail. A move that even shocked Yaradua himself. And he succeeded in replacing the old untouchables with his cronies whom he devoured, as he seemed fit.
The first goal of any Nigerian that hopes to contribute to Nigeria’s development is to get ready for a battle with the untouchables. These symbols of Nigerian entrenched power must be demystified if the new breed will have any chance. Until we sweep them all out of power, into retirement, there would not be any change in attitude. The greatest danger the untouchables pose to the Nigerian nation is that they are contaminating another generation of Nigerians who are struggling to find their way into positions of responsibility. That is the deepest cuts of them all.

NewsRescue

Nigeria: Preparing To Be Left Behind? – Tolu Ogunlesi



Nigeria: Preparing To Be Left Behind? – Tolu Ogunlesi
Last week, I watched a CNN feature on the new railway freight service from Chongqing in China to Duisburg, Germany. Spanning 11,000km, across six countries – China, Kazakhstan, Russia, Belarus, Poland and Germany – the service allows manufacturers in China to move their products to Europe in 15 days, half the time it takes by sea, and at a fraction of the cost of air freight.
Not unexpectedly, my mind went to Nigeria, and our tyranny of low expectations and high mediocrity. We are cavemen with eyes on the ground, dancing around small fires, while the rest of the world is laying claim to real estate on the sun.
Things have become so bad that we’re forced to celebrate the resuscitation of a railway line that the British first completed a hundred years ago (Ignore for a moment the fact that the President has just appointed, to oversee it, a man who’s almost as old as the railway line itself). And no, we’re not celebrating its upgrade to high-speed status. We’re deeply satisfied that it’s still running – that’s the standard by which we measure “transformation” these days.
And then to crown it all, we’re forced to endure petulant lectures from the President’s spokespersons, about how we should bow down and praise his name to the highest heavens for reviving the line. As though he’s elected to do us all a favour.
I recently came across the Vision 2020 document. Here’s what it envisions, in road transport: “For land transport, the government will construct eight major roads (6-lane at the minimum) to link the extreme ends of the country e.g. two (2) diagonally: Maiduguri-Lagos and Sokoto-Calabar, two (2) across the country: Kano-Port Harcourt and Ilorin-Yola and four (4) spanning the borders of the country: Sokoto-Maiduguri; Sokoto-Lagos; Lagos-Calabar; Calabar-Maiduguri; and also Lagos-Benin-Onitsha-Enugu-Port Harcourt.”
Isn’t that interesting? Just imagine if, after 15 years of democracy, we could boast having accomplished the road vision outlined above. By my estimates, the total length of those eight roads comes to less than 10,000km. Is that too much to accomplish in 15 years?
Yes, by Nigerian standards. Expecting 10,000km of new highway in 16 years would be asking for too much in a country that in 15 years has not quite managed to fix the less-than-150km Lagos-Ibadan Expressway.
But by Chinese, or even Indian standards, certainly not. Between 2006 and 2010, China is reported to have built 639,000km of roads (28,700km of which is expressway).
As of 2010, India was building 9km of roads per day (3,000km per annum; 12,000km in four years), with a target of 20km/day. I need someone from the Federal Ministry of Works headed by Mike Onolememen to tell us how many new kilometers of highway Nigeria has added in the four years since Mr. Jonathan became President. Let’s start the 2015 election conversation from that point.
Ditto housing. Let the President come and tell us how many houses have been built in the last four years, considering a national housing deficit of 16 million units.
Whatever happened to big ambitions, and to the big will needed to stand by those ambitions, against all odds and vested interests?
I imagine one key question around the issue of ambitious infrastructure will be funding. How will Nigeria fund the construction of 10,000km of roads and one million low-cost housing units, over, say, the next 24 months?
My answer would be a peculiarly Nigerian one: How are the other emerging economies funding theirs? Why can’t we do whatever it is they’re doing? How is Brazil managing to build more than a million new homes per annum? Do its leaders have two heads?
Let’s not forget that we’re a major oil producing country, awash with petrodollars. A country that can spend as much as we’re spending on militants shouldn’t be complaining about funds for big road or housing projects. I’m convinced that the money Nigeria is currently leaking – from fuel subsidy scams, oil theft, and NNPC brigandage – is more than enough to pull off a good number of construction miracles.
At the weekend, I attended a meet-the-candidate session with Sam Nda-Isaiah, Publisher of LeadershipNewspapers, and the first person to declare his 2015 presidential ambition (on the platform of the All Progressives Congress). He touched on an important theme: The concept of ambitious thinking; the sort that transformed Dubai and Singapore from backwater lands into what they are today.
“This is a time for big ideas and history-changing endeavours,” Nda-Isaiah said. He convincingly argued that Nigeria’s Presidency is powerful enough to accomplish anything it sets out to do, as long as the occupier of that office “really (means) it…”
One major problem with the current occupier of that office, however, is that beyond vague references to “transformation”, one never gets a sense of what his personal vision for Nigeria is.
His commitment to that invisible vision is even more invisible. Just like during the Umaru Yar’Adua days, it sadly seems like President Jonathan is just one of the several people running Nigeria. If the buck stops anywhere it doesn’t seem to be anywhere near his table.
Instead of the Presidency to take the steps to convince us otherwise, it is resorting to the classic game of distraction. The Board of the National Distraction Commission has been reconstituted, and it is working assiduously to fulfill its mandate, the linchpin of which is this so-called “National Conference”.
I find it absurd that the government is showing seriousness in the matter at this time, barely one year to general elections. This is something that should have happened two years ago (with the same presidential commitment that was wasted on the ill-advised fuel subsidy removal).
The President and his people are probably counting on the fact that this N9bn Jamboree (“Big Brother Nigeria – the Government Edition”) will keep us all sufficiently entertained/distracted until the middle of the year, when the World Cup will take over.
Since it doesn’t seem like there’s anything we can do at this time to shoot down the conference idea, the best we might be able to do is refuse to be distracted by it, and insist on keeping alive the conversations about the things that really matter at this time: The parlous state of transport infrastructure, the power sector reforms, housing issues, unemployment, etc.
Why, you might ask, am I focusing exclusively on the Federal Government? One, because it gets the biggest chunk of Nigeria’s resources (52 per cent of the Federation Account goes to Abuja, leaving 36 states and 774 local governments to share the rest). Two, because, as the highest level of government, it has a moral responsibility to set a good example for the rest to follow. When Abuja is behaving irresponsibly, or like a Federal Government trapped in a Local Government mindset, why should we be surprised when the states follow suit?
Nigeria is not going to magically become a country where things work. We will have to make it happen by the choices we make and the seriousness we show. For now, we are busy celebrating the fact that the world thinks we are MINT-hot. But we can’t live off “potential” indefinitely.
I met a Rwandan journalist in Lagos at the weekend. He told of how Nigerians are now flocking to Rwanda, to invest in agriculture (coffee farms), attracted by the ease of doing business there. It takes 48 hours to register a business. There is none of the obnoxious multiple taxes associated with Nigeria. Corruption is not a beast the President openly feeds. And the visa-on-arrival policy actually works.
A few years ago, Nigeria announced a visa-on-arrival policy for business visitors. If you’re a visiting businessperson and you believe that you can show up at the Murtala Muhammed International Airport, Ikeja and expect to get a visa, just because the government has said so, I’ve got a small ocean I’d like to sell to you.
Things like this explain why Nigeria is ranked 120th out of 148 countries, in the World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness Index 2013-2014; interestingly, 54 places behind Rwanda.
At the moment, there isn’t much compelling evidence that we are a serious country. If we find ourselves irredeemably left behind by the rest of the world (starting with Ghana three doors away), we shouldn’t be surprised.
It will be a well-deserved fate, no doubt.

Omojuwa.com

The Silent Killer In Your Veins



Tennis star Serena Williams battled it and it was the cause of the untimely death of Heavy D, as well as countless Americans every single day. What exactly are blog clots, how can you prevent them, and what are the risk factors?
Currently, it is estimated that 25,000 people who are admitted to hospital die from preventable venous thromboembolism (blood clots in the leg and potentially fatal clots which travel to the lung) each year. This has led the Department of Health to make the prevention of this “silent killer” across the NHS a priority for the forthcoming years.
Preventing Blood Clots

BlackDoctor+Org

National confab, not solution to Nigeria’s problem – Bishop Kukah


National confab, not solution to Nigeria’s problem – Bishop Kukah
Bishop Hassan Matthew Kukah is the Catholic Bishop of Sokoto Diocese. In this interview with journalists including TUNDE OMOLEHIN in Sokoto, Kukah bares his mind on national confab, the potential of Nigeria as a great nation and the recent law banning same-sex marriage in the country, among other national issues. Excerpts:
What is your take on the proposed national confab?
I have always been a critic of any national conference. My reason was based on the fact that I participated in the last political reform conference and tragically, the politicians sank the findings of that committee. Subsequently, I was also convinced that the problems of Nigerians cannot to be resolved by the constitution, dialogue and so on, because we are dealing with issues of electricity, power, good roads, quality education and so on. Aside that, my own personal conviction is that Nigeria does not even need new laws for now. What we need is a review of existing laws, which covers virtually everything we are yearning for. But all those reports or laws have not been implemented.
On the recent confab, my own worry is that if the politicians are going to hand-pick the delegation, then, what we are going to have is a gathering of politicians. That has been the greatest undoing of all the similar initiatives we have had in the area of constitution making in the past. In fact, that was how my experience has been. If you have read some of the reports, you would understand my point now. Let me give an instance way back in 1976 when Nigeria was planning to return to democratic rule.  At the end of the day, a lot of prominent politicians and some of the noisiest members of the National Assembly always end up being the key people in politics. It is largely because they have seen the platform as an opportunity for grandstanding and that was why religion and regionalism suddenly became important issues in such discussion. Another worry is that, I do not see the national dialogue to be concluded in time before elections or within a short time frame for the contents to become a policy that could guide us. But, I will adopt the wait and see attitude on this issue.

Is the unity of this country being threatened in any way by politicians?
The unity of Nigeria is in the hands of Nigerians. It is not something that anybody is going to do for us. I think that one of the saddest things that has happened to us is that the over 30 years of military rule, even the experience we had with democracy, doesn’t seem to be the case that ordinary Nigerians have got the good value of governance. And these are some of the issues we are still battling with. The discussion of nation’s unity would not stop unless Nigerians see a qualitative change in leadership, in their lives. Nigerians want to see something positive about their security, standard of living and in their personal lives. Nigerians want to be sure that our country is safe, that there is job security. These are the issues that are so dear in the heart of every Nigerian. And the solution to all these would no longer let Nigerians ask questions about the unity of this country. Also, the continuous discussion of our religious and regional identity has continued to pull us back from the sense of nationhood. Nations are united not by constitution or political declarations but largely on infrastructure. The day a Nigerian can go from Sokoto to Aba on a decent railway lane or less threatening road, the day Nigerians can move in different directions, and the day we cease to take electricity for granted, then I can assure you that Nigeria must have achieved 80 to 90 per cent of unity.
At present, is Nigeria at a crossroads?
Well, the good thing about crossroads is that it tells you whether you are going to turn left, right or move forward. I guess the crossroad is a good way to explain our situations. But it is also important to say the choice about which direction we go is in our hands.

What about using regionalism and religion, as tools to win elections in Nigeria?
The issue is that, there is nothing you can say about politics and politicians, politicians would always appease to things that give them attention. It could be religion, ethnicity, and gender, whatever it could be. But as a Nigerian, our own responsibility is to be able to see beyond the grandstanding. This is where we who are not in politics must be very conscious. Politics is like a marriage, because if a married man is quarrelling with his wife, it does not mean they will separate tomorrow. A lot of public discourse or arguments in Nigeria today are as a result of the selfish reason of our greedy politicians. It is considerable now that people in PDP would still probably go to APC and those in APC would probably cross over to PDP and so on. For Nigerian politicians, it only depends on where food is easy to get. This is the reality when talking politics in Nigeria. That is why their grandstandings are always heating the polity. The issue of whether the President should have come from the North, whether Jonathan should go or stay, are all about personal interest and they use media to achieve such aim. Though, there may be nothing wrong with such opinions, the most important thing is to know who and who represent our aspirations. For us who are spectators, we need to learn not to cry more than the bereaved because when the politicians will solve their differences, you might still be in the dark.

What is your take on some religious leaders who are fond of making unguarded utterances?
I think there should be a law in the land to tackle that. This is not the question of what you are wearing. It is not by the size of your cross or turban. If you say things that the law considers not in keeping with the right of ordinary citizens or saying things that can wreak havoc, disturbance or disunity, I think the law of the land should always take its full course.

What is your view on political parties labelling one another a party of a particular religion?
As far as am concerned, the people in APC are more than able to defend themselves. On papers, you cannot stop politicians making such utterances. Let us take Sokoto for instance, if you are campaigning in the state, what you say about the religion of Islam is very important. It is not supposed to be the same if you are campaigning to become the President of Nigeria because at that level, you are not just talking about the religions. So, if APC, PDP want to have majority of women, men or a particular religion in their fold, let it be. There is strength in diversity. I think the people in such party should know enough to take note of that criticism or not as to adjust appropriately, otherwise Nigerians may vote based on what they consider to be things of great interest to them. It is all about calculation to win election by the politicians.

President Jonathan recently assented to the bill, outlawing same sex marriage. How do you see the development, especially the uproar from the international community?
We commended President Goodluck Jonathan for that but my worry is that, I wish the way the National Assembly passed this law quickly, such effort should be applied to pass the law against unemployment so quickly. Can you imagine that it took all better part of six months just to negotiate ASUU demands? But to say the least is that this is not a big issue as far as Gay business is concerned. But again, the most dangerous part of it is to make sure that this does not lead to homophobia. As far as am concerned, anybody who lives in Nigeria and most part of Africa knows that culturally, religiously and morally, it is not our life and culture.

What is your advice to both Christians and Muslims in Nigeria?
My advice is that people should be able to differentiate between a glorious religion of Christianity and Islam and what we as Christians and Muslims are struggling with. We are politicians, businessmen seeking promotion and so on but we should let the purity of our religions to always remain. And I think this is what we must try and uphold. And again, I always say that I do not buy the idea of Muslim and Christian prayers in an event because very soon, we will have women and men prayers, a prayer by tall people and another prayer for short people and so on. The more we continue talking like this, the more we recognize our differences. If a Christian prays, does that mean that such prayer is only for the Christians that are present at such an event? The same thing goes to Muslim prayer. Is it for only Muslim Ummah in the gathering?

What would you say about the relative peace being enjoyed in Sokoto State?
Two months ago, I was at the Vatican because I am a member of Political Council for Inter-Religious Dialogue, the highest decision making body regarding matters on how the church wants to relate with Muslims across the world. So, coming from Nigeria, everybody would turn to hear from me. They want to know why our Christians are always fighting. They also want to know whether I am in danger or not. But people remained shocked when I tell them, ‘no, we do not have problem between Christians and Muslims in Nigeria.’ Because if there is a problem between us, in Sokoto State for instance, it would not take about two hours before they will kill we the Christians in Sokoto.



Strange as it may sound, I am more secured in Sokoto than when I am outside Sokoto State. I cannot say what I did not experience. In Kebbi and Katsina, we have had no incident and in Zamfara State, we have had other incidents that have something to do with criminality but not religion. All these states are under my diocese. In Sokoto particularly, we have enjoyed the warmth of the good people. There are good men and women in Sokoto State.

Does Nigeria, as a nation, have the potential to be great?
Yes, of course. I just came back from a conference held in London. The organisers brought 65 scholars together around the world and I felt honoured to be invited. It is about what the world would be in 2040. That was what the round-table was about. And I felt embarrassed as a Nigerian because what the Nigerian government is still discussing and thinking of, is the year 2015.
The topic of the fora was related to who is having power today, which will have power tomorrow and by the year 2040, who will also have power? But jokingly, I said to them that as a Nigerian, if you ask me who will have power, I wouldn’t know because power is electricity in Nigeria and not the kind of thing you are talking about. But really, it was interesting to hear that constantly Nigeria keeps coming to the table. Not as a country with potential greatness but as a great country. Nigeria is constantly placed on the table. Most of the discussion about South Africa was centred on Mandela. Now, Mandela is gone. What will happen is that whether Nigeria likes it or not, the focus on our country would inevitably be much more. The international communities recognise our position as a powerful country on her own. They recognise that this is not just a country that has an enormous natural and human resources. It is a country that clearly should know where it is going. But we are constantly pulling ourselves back as Muslims, as Christians, as Northerners and Southerners, while the rest of the world is seeing us as one unified country.

What will be your appeal to the Nigerian media?
I just want to appeal to you that politics is here again. The joyful thing is that military rule has ended. And as I said at the Governors’ Forum retreat in Sokoto recently, that it is an interesting thing that in all things that happened- political crisis in the last four years or so when the military could have taken over, we never heard anything. Imagine the uncertainty and debate on whether Yar’Adua was alive or dead. There couldn’t have been a better opportunity to hijack power. Also, imagine all the discussion on whether Goodluck Jonathan should take over or not? All that vacuum, nothing happened and the recent insecurity issue like Boko Haram. But strange enough, not a single Nigerian newspaper or in a discussion on television or radio stations, mentioned anything about soldier. What this means for us is that our people are firmly committed to democracy. With all these problems, this is the way we have chosen to go. And it is like a man in marriage, you may fight or quarrel, but if you decide you are going to stay married, no matter what happened, then the problems that arrive, will only strengthen your union. I want to appeal to the Nigerian media that we should re-affirm our commitment to the unity of our dear country. It is not all about whether President Goodluck Jonathan is the President of Nigeria today. It is actually possible that I can be a better President than President Jonathan. It is also possible that any other person could be a better president. But for now, I have not been offered the President of Nigeria. And these things are beyond just an individual. We believe in the will of God, when it is convenient for us, and we question the will of God when it is not convenient for us. Beyond politics and individual, there have to be a Nigeria first, before people’s ambition can be realised. I am just calling on you in the media, especially those of you that have great influence on the public because you shape public opinions in the polity, let us not focus on the quarrels among the politicians. And like I often tell the politicians too, it is their responsibility to make politics noble. The media should focus on the bad behaviours of some politicians, especially those who are bringing politics to disrepute. Our responsibility is to dish out correct and accurate information for ordinary citizens to make up their minds.

TheSun