NewsRescue- During Europe’s persecution of the Church and the Dark ages, it is known that the Muslim world saved knowledge and indeed Christianity, that later re-flourished during the renaissance. Research into the genesis of Islamic radicalism, which is a rather recent phenomenon in global political dimensions, and as is commonly known, takes root from Afghanistan in the cold-war era, leads to a most surprising find at the root of so-called Islamic fundamentalism,- School books. Perhaps radicalism is neither native nor accidental.
Al Qaeda remains at the forefront of the known axis of Islamic terror. Today, this has spread its tentacles to almost all nations of the world. Its source and the epicenter of this corrosive monster, that now includes AQIM(Al Qaeda in the Maghreb) of Northern Africa, Boko Haram in northern Nigeria, Al Shabaab of Somalia, LIFG (Libyan Islamic Fighting Group) of Libya, the Syrian terror insurgency, Jundullah of Iran, to mention a few dendrites, is Afghanistan and the Taliban/al Qaeda terror nidus.
What converted the Afghanistan into this terror radiating machine? Perhaps the answer lies in a 53 million dollar project conducted from 1980-1994 from the US University of Nebraska, Pakistan campus. A US funded project that printed textbooks to teach Afghanistan children in school the art or war and terror. Millions of books were made and printed in Pakistan under this project and disbursed to Afghanistan schools to teach the kids to love war and so-called Jihad. Dead Russians and guns and other weaponry were the material in these books made for the young readers, to imprint a culture of violence in their infantile minds.
These books are yet to be replaced in Afghanistan and were the focus of several articles in papers like the Washington post, UK Telegraph etc after the fall of Afghanistan.
From U.S. the ABC’s of Jihad
Violent Soviet-Era Textbooks Complicate Afghan Education Efforts
By Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway
Washington Post Staff Writers
In the twilight of the Cold War, the United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings, part of covert attempts to spur resistance to the Soviet occupation.
Saturday, March 23, 2002; Page A01
The primers, which were filled with talk of jihad and featured drawings of guns, bullets, soldiers and mines, have served since then as the Afghan school system’s core curriculum. Even the Taliban used the American-produced books, though the radical movement scratched out human faces in keeping with its strict fundamentalist code.
As Afghan schools reopen today, the United States is back in the business of providing schoolbooks. But now it is wrestling with the unintended consequences of its successful strategy of stirring Islamic fervor to fight communism. What seemed like a good idea in the context of the Cold War is being criticized by humanitarian workers as a crude tool that steeped a generation in violence.
–
“The pictures [in] the texts are horrendous to school students, but the texts are even much worse,” said Ahmad Fahim Hakim, an Afghan educator who is a program coordinator for Cooperation for Peace and Unity, a Pakistan-based nonprofit.
An aid worker in the region reviewed an unrevised 100-page book and counted 43 pages containing violent images or passages.
The military content was included to “stimulate resistance against invasion,” explained Yaquib Roshan of Nebraska’s Afghanistan center. “Even in January, the books were absolutely the same . . . pictures of bullets and Kalashnikovs and you name it.”
During the Taliban era, censors purged human images from the books. One page from the texts of that period shows a resistance fighter with a bandolier and a Kalashnikov slung from his shoulder. The soldier’s head is missing.
—
….In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the
Education Center for Afghanistan, located in Peshawar, Pakistan, and
operated by the Afghan mujahidin (holy warriors), published a series of
primary education textbooks replete with images of Islamic militancy.
These schoolbooks provided the mujahidin (who, after a ten-year
struggle, drove the Soviet occupying forces from Afghanistan in 1989)
with a medium for promoting political propaganda and inculcating values
of Islamic militancy into a new generation of holy warriors prepared to
conduct jihad against the enemies of Islam. Consider the following
introduction to the Persian alphabet in a first-grade language arts
book:
“A” is for Allah, “J” is for jihad
Pages from US-published textbooks for Afghanistan pupils
Alif [is for] Allah.
Allah is one.
Allah is one.
Bi [is for] Father (baba).
Father goes to the mosque…
Father goes to the mosque…
Pi [is for] Five (panj).
Islam has five pillars…
Islam has five pillars…
Ti [is for] Rifle (tufang).
Javad obtains rifles for the Mujahidin…
Javad obtains rifles for the Mujahidin…
Jim [is for] Jihad.
Jihad is an obligation. My mom went to the jihad. Our brother gave water to the Mujahidin…
Jihad is an obligation. My mom went to the jihad. Our brother gave water to the Mujahidin…
Dal [is for] Religion (din).
Our religion is Islam. The Russians are the enemies of the religion of Islam…
Our religion is Islam. The Russians are the enemies of the religion of Islam…
—
The books written with the purpose of ideological propaganda….We come across the following examples in math book:
- If out of 10 atheists, 5 are killed by 1 Muslim, 5 would be left.
- 5 guns + 5 guns = 10 guns
- 15 bullets – 10 bullets = 5 bullets, etc.
- 5 guns + 5 guns = 10 guns
- 15 bullets – 10 bullets = 5 bullets, etc.
—
The title of this story from a Dari language textbook is “Jihad.” An
excerpt from the book’s next page reads, “Jihad is the kind of war that
Muslims fight in the name of God to free Muslims and Muslim lands from
the enemies of Islam. If infidels invade, jihad is the obligation of
every Muslim.”
Fifth-grade Afghan refugees once learned the Pashto language from characters named Maqbool and Basheer.
Dick and Jane, this duo was not.
In one story, the fictional friends see a
group of Afghan mujahedeen cleaning their weapons as they prepare to
fight the Soviet army.
Maqbool tells Basheer they should help
the rebel fighters ready their machine guns. Basheer concurs. Soon they
are meeting with a mujahedeen commander.
“We want you to help clean the weapons and fight the Russians in jihad,” he tells Maqbool and Basheer.
The youngsters agree. Now, presumably, they are soldiers themselves.
The story, and many like it, appear in
the millions of textbooks written, printed and distributed during the
Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. The books taught reading and math and
sought to turn children against the Red Army and the Afghan communist
government.
The textbooks’ publisher: The University
of Nebraska at Omaha’s Center for Afghanistan Studies, operating inside
Pakistan on a U.S. government grant.
To the center’s longtime director, the
textbooks are byproducts of a dark era when Russian bombs killed Afghan
schoolchildren and rebel forces fought to save their country.
Exiled Afghan education officials, not UNO officials, wrote the books, Thomas Gouttierre says.
The center’s sole interest, according to him, was to deliver education to children who weren’t getting any.
—-
Jihad and Jihadism
by Abid Ullah Jan
(Monday, July 5, 2004)
“In short, Jihadism have two variant
meanings in the contemporary world. It is a label for the enemies of the
US occupations in its imperial quest for global domination. Jihadism
could suddenly change from a demonizing label to become a “holy war”
sponsored by the US in case, say France occupies Saudi Arabia or Kuwait
tomorrow. It would become a legal, compulsory, communal effort to redeem
the territories occupied by France.”
Jihad in its various forms and stages is
obligatory upon Muslims. Jihadism is a product of US opportunism. Jihad
is always for self-actualisation, eradication of mischief and
eliminating oppression with a focus on spiritual aspect at all levels.
Jihadism is a double edge sword used for self aggrandisement and
expansion of the American rule through the use of lies and
indiscriminate force with a narrow focus on worldly gains only.
For Muslims, it was a Jihad in
Afghanistan. However, for the US, with no relation to Islam and sympathy
for Muslims whatsoever, it was simply promotion of violence to weaken
an arch enemy, the Soviet Union. It was pure Jihadism, a selective
practice and policy without any concern for the people under occupation.
Today, Jihadism and Jihadists are mere
labels that the US uses as a bogyman to criminalise resistance to its
illegitimate occupations and to justify the policy of total domination
through its “war on terrorism.”
The purpose of sponsoring Jihadism in
Afghanistan was not to spread Islamic faith, defend Muslims or reap
rewards in the hereafter. If it were Jihad based on the Islamic concept,
it should have been launched and sponsored by the US simultaneously in
Kashmir, Palestine and Afghanistan. Relying on Jihadism then and now is
simply to extend sovereign American power.
There is no concept of Jihadism in Islam.
In the strict dictionary sense, as a suffix, -ism means “action,
process; practice”. As a noun, “ism” means a “doctrine; theory; system
of principles”. In the real world the meaning of -ism is not as simple.
There is a concept of oppression associated with -ism. It needs a
thorough examination to understand how -ism related oppression affects
oppressed people and if there is any place for it in Islam. There is a
concept of power — power-over and power-with — associated with “ism.”
When a person or a group of people has power over another person or group, the person or group with power-over
a) can control or make the other group do something, whether that group wants to or not
b) have more privilege ¾ status, social recognition, and freedom to do what they want than the other group
c) have more resources or wealth and receive better treatment than the other group
d) have the authority to define or describe the other group.
Here comes the concept of oppression: the
“ism.” The “power-over” that one group uses against another is
oppression, equivalent to “ism,” as in “racism,” “sexism,” or
“adultism.” Oppression, or “ism,” is a name for how the powerful use
that power to control the weak ¾ hurt them, make them feel bad, or get
something from them ¾ or receive better treatment and more resources
than them; all for the worldly objectives.
Of course any group or nation can hurt or
mistreat the other. Any people can be prejudiced about the other,
making stereotypical assumptions about each other. What makes
mistreatment into oppression is prejudice plus power. Prejudice is one
of the products of Nationalism and Patriotism. The reason there is no
place for any ism in Islam is that there is no place for prejudice in
Islam.
The Qur’an describes origin of prejudice
(15:33, 15:39-40, 2:34); warns of division on the basis of prejudice
(3:103, 42:13, 6:159, 8:46, 21:93, 35:28, 49:10 ); forbids not to mock,
judge or hurt another because you think you are better than the other
(49:11, 31:18) and advises to discern people by piety, not prejudice
(49:13).
Since prejudice plus power is considered
equal to an “ism,” Jihadism is considered Muslims’ prejudice against
non-Muslims combined with the military power-over non-Muslims. It is
considered just like prejudice against young people plus power-over that
makes adultism, or prejudice against people of color plus power-over
that makes racism. The same negative simplicity is applied to the term
Islamism which means Islam’s inherent prejudice against non-Muslims
which is combined with the religious and military power-over to oppress
and dominate all others.
The US apparently supported the Islamic
concept of Jihad against the Soviet Occupation of Afghanistan. Yet very
few know that it was simply the US sponsorship of Jihadism (American
prejudice against communism combined with military and economic muscle
to over-power the Soviet Union) that started long before there was a
need for Muslims to join Jihad.
In
an interview with the French magazine Le Nouvel Observateur, the former
national security adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, made a stunning
confession:
“According to the official version of
history, CIA aid to the Mujahideen began during 1980, that is to say,
after the Soviet Army invaded Afghanistan, December 24, 1979. But the
reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise. Indeed, it
was July 3, 1979, that President Carter signed the first directive for
secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that
very day, I wrote a note to the President in which I explained to him
that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military
intervention… We didn’t push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly
increased the probability that they would.” [1]
Earlier, the former director of the CIA,
Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs, From the Shadows, that American
intelligence services began to aid the Mujahideen in Afghanistan six
months before the Soviet intervention. The question is: From where did
come these Mujahideen when there was no time for Jihad indeed?
Having encouraged the Soviets to invade
Afghanistan — just like luring Saddam into Kuwait — the US armed itself
with a pretext for motivating, mobilizing and arming a population for
Jihadism against the occupation forces, which they rightly considered as
Jihad.
An aspect of the US Jihadism was to
produce — which are now called — Jihadists through extensive dozes of
Jihad to children under the guise of education. The Washington Post’s
Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway report about this process of
spreading, what the US now labels as “Jihadism”:
“In the twilight of the Cold War, the
United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren
with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic
teachings, part of covert attempts to spur resistance to the Soviet
occupation. The “Primers”, which were filled with talk of jihad and
featured drawings of guns, bullets, soldiers and mines, have served
since then as the Afghan school system’s core curriculum. Even the
Taliban used the American-produced books…” [2]
Unlike the ongoing efforts to eliminate
the Islamic concept of Jihad from school curriculum around the Muslim
world, Stephens and Ottaway identify how the US governmental and
educational organizations were involved in actually developing
Jihad-focused textbooks. They write:
“Published in the dominant Afghan
languages of Dari and Pashtu, the textbooks were developed in the early
1980s under an AID [Agency for International Development] grant to the
University of Nebraska-Omaha and its Center for Afghanistan Studies. The
agency spent $51 million on the university’s education programs in
Afghanistan from 1984 to 1994.”
Under this Jihadism project, the images and talk of resistance to occupation were craftily intermingled with regular education:
“Children were taught to count with
illustrations showing tanks, missiles and land mines, agency officials
said. They acknowledged that at the time it also suited US interests to
stoke hatred of foreign invaders.”
An examination of a textbook produced shocking results:
“An aid-worker in the region reviewed an unrevised 100-page book and counted 43 pages containing violent images or passages.”
The writers of the Washington Post story go on to provide an appalling example of the material:
“One page from the texts of that period
shows a resistance fighter with a bandolier and a Kalashnikov slung from
his shoulder. The soldier’s head is missing. Above the soldier is a
verse from the Koran. Below is a Pashtu tribute to the mujaheddin [sic],
who are described as obedient to Allah. Such men will sacrifice their
wealth and life itself to impose Islamic law on the government, the text
says.”
US books teach Afghan pupils to count with rifles
The United States’ Jihadism successfully
transformed Afghan children into true freedom fighters. None of the
present analyst, obsessed with using the word Jihadism and Jihadists,
wrote a single word to condemn the US ways to promoting violence. Many
of the presently labeled “Jihadists” live on from that period to join or
morally support the resistance against new occupations.
When it was Jihadism on the part of the
US, almost all Muslims accepted it as the US role in Islamic Jihad. Now,
that the US considers Muslims Jihad as Jihadism and terrorism, no one
is ready to point out that it is the extension of the same Afghan
resistance which the US is reaping at a much higher cost than its cost
of cultivation.
In the Muslim world, resistance to the US
occupation is as much Jihad today as it was in the 80s. The same
requests for God to avenge the occupiers’ actions pour down from mosque
minarets, and according to Neil MacFarquhar of the New York Times (April
24, 2004), “some women university students wear Osama bin Laden
T-shirts under their enveloping robes” — not for what the US blames him,
but for his logic of calling the oppressed into action: to resist
occupations. The calls to resist oppression are based in Islamic
teachings, which the US sponsored Jihadism inculcated in Muslim mind for
so long to its own disadvantage.
Now that the US comes to reap the
whirlwind, many Americans consider attacks on US occupation forces a
shocking and unsettling crime. Many thousand civilians were killed in
Mujahideen attacks on Kabul and other cities where people chose not to
leave their homes. The Saudi Interior Ministry then chose not to issue
statements like these: “May God curse you, you vermin, you people of
filth and not Jihad.”
Muslims could never launch such an
effective campaign for Jihad as the US did for Jihadism. Most of those
who resist the Anglo-American occupations today rely on the same
momentum of 1980s and the same theological underpinnings to justify
their actions against occupation.
At the government levels, Muslim
countries have quickly shifted from American Jihadism to American
anti-Jihad mode for their own sustainability. Saudi Arabia was one of
the Chief financer of Jihad in Afghanistan. Now, for the advisor to the
Saudi ambassador to Britain Mujahideen are mere “jihadis.” Musharraf
claims to be fighting Jihadists for the interest of Pakistan.
Pakistan has not only sealed its border
but is also acting like an occupying force in its own land to subdue any
assistance to the freedom fighters in Afghanistan. On the other hand,
Saudi officials say they are ensuring that the border with Iraq is
sealed. They have installed heat sensors to detect movement.
The US and its allies in Jihad against
the Soviet Union have a troubled history with preaching Jihad in the
past and facing Jihad in the present. Actually, Jihad was officially
sanctioned by almost all governments around the world against the Soviet
occupation in Afghanistan. They thought they could rid themselves of
the Red Menace, but instead their sponsorship of some basic principles
of resisting injustice and oppression has now started to haunt them.
To discredit resistance in Iraq and turn
it into a global threat, American analysts don’t hesitate to call it a
movement for establishing Khilafah. Robert Spencer writes: “Iraq is just
one battlefield of many: Muslim militants all over the world are moved
today to murder and mayhem for the sake of the caliphate.” [3]
In his latest column, Spencer argues: “If
he [Bush] began to use the word ‘jihad’ the way those he identifies as
terrorists and evildoers do, he could in one stroke remove charges of
opportunism and lack of focus from the Democrats’ arsenal. For this is
in fact the war we’re in: a war against people who identify themselves
as jihadis, not as terrorists.” [4]
In other words, freedom fighters’ war to
end Soviet Union’s occupation in Afghanistan was Jihad and the US war
against the same freedom fighters is a “war on terror… a defensive
action against global jihadists.” [5]
Identifying Jihadists and terrorists is
further simplified in the light of Ronald Reagan’s definition of
communists. Spencer believes, a Jihadist is “someone who reads the
Qur’an and Sunnah” and anti-Jihadist is “someone who understands how
these Islamic texts are used to recruit and motivate terrorists.” [6]
Going by the same definition, the US officials were the greatest
Jihadists — immersed in Jihadism — who used Islamic text better than
anyone else to motivate and recruit what the Soviet Union considered as
terrorists.
In short, Mujahideen, greeted in the
White House, were the force to achieve freedom in Afghanistan. Now, a
180-degree turn shows “freedom is under attack by the warriors of
jihad.”
Jihadism and Islamism are the weapons for
what the US analysts are bent on proving as the US war with Islam. They
proudly quote former Muslims, such as Ibn Warraq: “There are very
useful analogies to be drawn between communism and Islam,” says Ibn
Warraq. “Communism has been defeated, at least for the moment; Islamism
has not, and unless a reformed, tolerant, liberal kind of Islam emerges
soon, perhaps the final battle will be between Islam and Western
democracy.”
It is encouraging that Ibn Warraq didn’t
use any prefix with Islam, such as “fundamentalist,” “extremist,” or
“radical” Islam. It is a straight forward war with Islam and those
Muslims “who read the Qur’an and Sunnah.” This must be enough to give an
idea that Jihadism was used as an ideological tool to intensify war
against the Soviet Union. It is now used as a demonising label to
consolidate occupation and eliminate any resistance.
In short, Jihadism have two variant
meanings in the contemporary world. It is a label for the enemies of the
US occupations in its imperial quest for global domination. Jihadism
could suddenly change from a demonizing label to become a “holy war”
sponsored by the US in case, say France occupies Saudi Arabia or Kuwait
tomorrow. It would become a legal, compulsory, communal effort to redeem
the territories occupied by France.
The path away from state-terrorism,
conquest and enslavement lies in the US government forthrightly
acknowledging the historic role of its Jihadism, followed by apologies
to Jihadism’s victims, developing a base for nonviolent resolution of
the global issues with justice and (the hardest part) actually ceasing
to wage wars, which are no more than Jihadism through GIs and allies — a
struggle in the cause of worldly gains at the expense of innocent
lives.
Unfortunately, such a process of
redemption is not now under way; the US Jihadism will probably continue
until the war lords in Washington are defeated by the superior wisdom of
the American public. Only when the US Jihadism is defeated will
ordinary Americans finally find their voice and truly begin the hard
work of moderating America.
