Saturday, 9 March 2013

Justin Bieber Lunges At Paparazzi, Has To Be Restrained By His Own Bodyguard (PHOTOS)



Is Justin Bieber unraveling before our eyes?
Just hours after he passed out backstage at his London concert and was rushed to hospital, the teenage pop star almost got violent with the paparazzi. Photos show the 19-year-old lunging at photographers, and he evidently had to be restrained by his own bodyguard.
Video footage of the altercation shows Bieber angrily responding to a photographer's insults, by yelling "I'll f**king beat the f**k out of you."
The pop star almost immediately realized this was not his best move and turned to Twitter to do some preemptive damage control. In a series of tweets he wrote:
Ahhhhh! Rough morning. Trying to feel better for this show tonight but let the paps get the best of me...Sometimes when people r shoving cameras in your face all day and yelling the worst thing possible at u...well I'm human. Rough week. Not gonna let them get the best of me again. Gonna get focused on this show tonight. Adrenaline is high now. Gonna put it on the stage. Only way someone can break u is if u let them.
Rough week, indeed. Ever since Bieber trekked across the pond it's been nothing but problems. First Bieber turned 19 and proclaimed he had the "worst birthday." Then he was told to put his "f**king shirt on" by Olivia Wilde, and angered fans when he showed up late at a London gig. Then on Wednesday, he had a mini-meltdown on Twitter, slamming "fake stories" that are used to sell papers.
Just prior to the singer's collapse on Thursday, came reports that Bieber had been warned by his record label to cut back on the partying:
“After an emergency meeting in the U.S., Justin’s people had him on Skype to bosses and he was given a serious talking-to," a source told the U.K. paper the Mirror. "It was suggested he start staying in more and basically cleaning up his act. He’s kicking off the European leg of his tour next week and has been told to stay in more when he’s not performing. Justin took the news well and has promised to go back to putting his fans first.”
With Bieber displaying such uncharacteristic behavior, some are worried that he's quickly spiraling out of control.
justin bieber lunges paparazzi
justin bieber lunges paparazzi

Elisabeth Hasselbeck Leaving 'The View'? Us Weekly Reports Co-Host Is Being Ousted


The Huffington Post  |  By  

Elisabeth Hasselbeck is being fired from "The View," according to Us Weekly.
Quoting anonymous sources, the magazine reported Friday that the conservative co-host is following Joy Behar out the door after market researchers found that her political views were clashing with the audience. "People did not watch the show because of Elisabeth. So they told her yesterday her contract would not be renewed," a source told Us Weekly.
That report followed a Deadline piece which said that her future on the ABC show was "unclear."
Following Us Weekly's report, TV Newser posted a similar story. The site's Alex Weprin cited two sources who said Hasselbeck was leaving. A spokesman for the show told Weprin that Hasselbeck has a "long-term contract."
If Hasselbeck's conservatism is a problem with audiences, it would appear to be a relatively new one; she has been on the show for nearly ten years, and "The View" has maintained its ratings success.
Hasselbeck's departure would mean that "The View" is suddenly without two of its longest-running hosts. The show has had the same cast since 2007, when it brought in Whoopi Goldberg and Sherri Shepherd to replace Rosie O'Donnell and Star Jones. Hasselbeck's exit would also leave the show without one of its main sources of conflict; her political arguments with Goldberg and Behar — and, before them, O'Donnell — have long been a key feature.
HuffingtonPost

House of Reps member chides Northern elders over Boko Haram amnesty negotiation

By

Mr. Bitrus Kaze, member, representing Jos South/Jos East Federal Constituency in the House of Representatives, is one of those who has condemned the calls by some Northern elders that the dreaded Boko Haram militants be granted amnesty, DailyPost can report.
Mr. Bitrus made his position known in Jos, yesterday when he said that the call by the Sultan of Sokoto, Alhaji Mohammad Sa’ad Abubakar III and other northern Governors, that amnesty be granted to the Boko Haram militants was unconstitutional, hence could not be justified.
“Coming at a time when security reports from terrorists’ training camps in Mali have established links between Boko Haram and Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, the advocacy for amnesty in favour of Boko Haram offends the Nigerian Terrorism (Prevention) Act, 2011 which provides for effective implementation of the several international Conventions on the Prevention, Financing and Combating of Terrorism which Nigeria is a signatory.
“The constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 provides that the security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of government. President Goodluck Jonathan has an obligation to enforce all international conventions on terrorism none of which provides for amnesty to terrorists.
“The Boko Haram Islamic fundamentalists themselves have never sought for amnesty; why should the Sultan and the Northern Governors Forum cry more than the bereaved? Just last week, the Boko Haram leader Shiek Shekau himself claimed responsibility for perpetrating terrorism and staunchly denied any relationship with Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abdulazeez who while claiming to be his second in command, pronounced a ceasefire.
“All this while, both the Sultan and the Northern Governors Forum have consistently maintained that Boko Haram and their sponsors are faceless; how come they are now advocating for amnesty for people they do not know?”, the statement said.
DailyPost

BIZARRE!!! Unborn Baby Showing Face Outside The Mother's Tummy (Photos)

09/03/2013

Mom-to-be Karen McMartin doesn’t have to wait for asonogram to get an idea of what her child is going to look like.

The pregnant woman can see an outline of her baby on her burgeoning belly. She discovered the print on her tummy when she was just 25-weeks pregnant and some colleagues at her hair salon were making jokes about her protruding belly button.

The British citizen explained to The Sun about her unique baby bump:

“I was in the staff room on a break. We were actually having a laugh at my belly button sticking out and checking for baby movement.

“Then Karen who owns the salon came in and said, ‘Oh my God, I can see a face.’ She took a picture and we’ve been showing it to folk ever since.”

Twenty-five year old McMartin, who already has a daughter Chloe, 2, with her husband David, added: “No one can believe how clear it is. You can see a nose, mouth and eyes — even the cheeks.”

Her boss Karen Monan, 45, who is the owner of the Kazmark salon in Irvine, Ayrshire, said: “Karen was lying back and I was having a feel of her bump.

“Then she lifted her head up and all of a sudden the shape of her tummy changed — and this face just appeared.”

What everyone is seeing is not actually the face of McMartin’s unborn child, but an illusion. The Sun spoke to medical expert Dr. Carol Cooper who explained that the “face” was actually a trick that was caused by her swollen belly button, an old bellybutton piercing, veins and stretch marks.

She added: “The paler area that forms the ‘face’ may well be the baby’s back.”

Illusion or not, it still makes for a pretty cool picture.

TalkofNaija

Nobody Is Bigger Than The Law, Obasanjo Says As He Visits FRSC To Collect Driver’s Licence


FORMER PRESIDENT OLUSEGUN OBASANJO, DOING THE BIOMETRIC CAPTURE FOR HIS DRIVERS LICENCE IN  ABUJA ON FRIDAY (NAN)
FORMER PRESIDENT OLUSEGUN OBASANJO, DOING THE BIOMETRIC CAPTURE FOR HIS DRIVERS LICENCE IN
ABUJA ON FRIDAY
Former President, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, has declared that nobody is above the law in the collective drive to ensure compliance with traffic rules and regulations in Nigeria.Speaking after processing his driver’s license at the Abuja national headquarters of the Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC), Obasanjo said, “If I have to drive, I must have a valid driver’s license like others. That informed my visit. We should note that the driver’s licence serves other purposes beyond driving of a vehicle and also useful outside the country such as certification of somebody’s identity.”
He added, “Anybody who wants to be law abiding must go through this process because you cannot be bigger than the law, no matter your political position or social status. You must pass through this process unless you are not ready to be law abiding”
InformationNigeria

The North Does Not Control Nigeria’s Oil Blocks, By Toyin Akinosho


Senator Ita Enang’s spirited claim at the National Assembly Wednesday to the effect that 83% of the country’s oil block is in the hands of northerners appears to be inspired  from assertions contained in an old article by a newspaper commentator, Mr. Ross Alabo-George whose famous essay was titled Poverty And Deprivation: Why The North Is Poor. 
In the excerpted refutation below, Toyin Akinosho, a petroleum geologist with over two decades of work at Chevron and now publisher of the well-regarded Africa Oil and Gas Report, argues angrily that such lines of thought canvassed by the likes of Senator Ita Solomon Enang and indeed Mr. Ross Alabo-George are merely hysterical, and tendentious, designed to mislead the public. Mr. Akinosho characterizes the arguments as crappy and crummy. It is excerpted from the African Oil+Gas Report for the value it brings to the current debate about Nigeria’s oil resources and the National Question.
Alabo-George’s article plays up so well the sentiments that a good number of Nigerians, especially middle class types excluded from the spoils of the petroleum subsidy, and allied deliverables, nurse about the kind of leadership we have suffered since independence.
But it has gone around so far and keeps being forwarded so rampantly, largely because it plays to the ethnic schism; the suspicions that each of us harbours, in our different silos, about “the other”.
It’s largely a response to the disingenuous claim by Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, the Central Bank Governor, that the Boko Haram insurgency is a response to the 13% derivation allocated to the oil producing states from the federation account. “There is clearly a direct link between the very uneven nature of distribution of resources and the rising level of violence”, Sanusi told The Financial Times of London.
Alabo-George’s piece is compelling when he contrasts what non oil-producing Southern states have been able to do with their supposedly meager allowances with what their Northern counterparts have done with their own allocations.
“Ekiti State has about the same revenue as Yobe and Gombe”, he contends, “but only 17 students passed WAEC and NECO in Gombe state last year, while Ekiti State is known for its high literacy level”.
I find two beautiful quotable quotes in the article: (1) “Borno State has a bigger budget than that of Cross River, a Niger Delta State. While the leaders of Cross River over the last decade have transformed it into the nation’s leading tourist destination, those of Borno have transformed it into a Somalia”.
(2) “Gombe State has a bigger budget than Enugu and Anambra, why has MASSOB not bombed anyone”?
But once Alabo- George ventures beyond the political economic analysis and starts to list who owns what oil and gas assets, his article is a litany of inaccuracies and lies. He gets it totally wrong.
He writes about the estate of the late Mai Deribe, the Bornu State born businessman, supposedly owning a huge oil field; Rilwanu Lukman having controlling shares in Afren; Atiku Abubakar being the stupendously rich beneficiary of the profits of Intels, the logistics company; Aminu Dantata’s Express Petroleum. He ties Amni Petroleum to only Sani Bello.
So much conspiracy theory.
Oil acreage ownership in Nigeria does not have ethnic colouration. What’s more important, sustaining production from oil and gas assets, whether or not awarded by the state, is determined by how much of a businessman you are.
When Jibril Aminu handed out oil prospecting blocks, in the first comprehensive effort “to encourage indigenous participation” in 1991, he gave blocks to companies owned by Folawiyo, Abiola, Adenuga, Udoji, Ibru, Igbinedion,(all Southerners) as much as he gave to enterprises set up by people like Saleh Jumbo and Mai Deribe.
Between 1991 and 1993, we suddenly had over 25 companies, that were Nigerian E&P companies and they took themselves so seriously that they set up an association they christened “Nigerian Association of Indigenous Petroleum Exploration Companies”. But what did these people do with the acreages? They were mostly clueless about how to progress things.
Out of that class of awardees, only Mike Adenuga created what you could really call an E&P company. He is the only one producing oil today, from his own block.
It’s bad enough that Nigerian indigenous private acreage holders don’t produce, as a collective, up to 150,000 Barrels per day, or 7% of the national daily production, so why are we fighting ourselves?
And I am less keen on how much you’re getting as rent from the asset you are holding, than the capacity you are building as manager of a Nigerian oil company who is awarded the asset, in trust for the rest of us.
I am for an ongoing, earnest debate on the National Question.  But false information misleads all of us into false conclusions, which reduce the complexity of the solutions we ought to be proffering.
The author cites a number of hydrocarbon acreages belonging to Northern elites, but ignores the fact that holding an acreage is one thing; getting value out of it is another.
That so many people believe the poorly researched article, and so instantly forward it that it becomes one of the most travelled essays on the National Question, is testimony to poor knowledge of how the oil industry works.
The first field the author mentions is Obe field, which, he rightly claims, is held by Cavendish Petroleum, a company set up by Alhaji Mai Deribe. Alabo- George lied by saying that the Obe field, the main hydrocarbon pool in OML 110, contains 500Million barrels of oil reserves.
The Obe field does not have a proven 20 Million barrels. I am not sure it has 10Million barrels. It is not producing as I write. The Obe field has not produced for five years, since 2007, when Tranfigura, the last technical partner engaged by Cavendish, walked out.
I don’t know what discipline Mr Alabo-George belongs to, but this point I am about to make is well known to every junior petroleum geologist with three year experience in the crummiest E&P company: If a field holds 500Million barrels of oil, proven, in shallow water Nigeria, it won’t lie fallow. Investors would rush it.
In countries where you don’t have the complications that the NNPC brings to the table here, fields that haven’t proven much more than 500Million barrels are “rushed” through to development.
Ghana’s Jubilee field didn’t prove a billion barrels before the country’s authorities approved a field development plan. Apart from Nigeria, Angola, Libya, Algeria, Ghana (now, since 2008) and perhaps Equatorial Guinea, no African country has a billion barrels in proven reserves. 500 Million barrels is half of that.
Mr Alabo-George says that Obe has the capacity to produce about 120,000 barrels of crude oil daily from its OBE 4 and OBE 5 wells. What sort of numeracy is this? Or is he dreaming these figures? How can a field with less than twenty million barrels “have the capacity” to produce 120,000 barrels per day?. What’s capacity?
Alabo George’s second example of a wealthy northerner swimming in oil money is Mohammed Indimi, “a Fulani and close friend of General Ibrahim Babangida”. He says “Oriental Energy Resources Limited runs three oil blocks: OML 115, the Okwok field and the Ebok field. OML 115 and Okwok are OML PSC, while Ebok is an OML JV. All of them good yielding offshore oil blocks”.
The author  just  doesn’t care to verify his claims. True, Indimi’s Oriental Resources holds the three assets. OML 115 is not producing as I write. No one has certified that there’s a producible field in the acreage. Ebok is being produced, on Oriental Resources’ behalf, by Afren, a UK listed company. Last year, the field delivered an average of 8,000Barrels of Oil per Day(BOPD), according to Afren’s website.  You can google it. Okwok, as I write, is still in development. Translation: it has produced nary a drop of oil.
Aminu Dantata’s Express Petroleum holds the Oil Mining Lease 108, with technical partners Shebah Petroleum, which bought out Conoco, the original technical partners. Fine.
The Ukpokiti field, the main asset on the acreage, produced for quite a while; and should have made the Dantatas quite rich, over a period of more than seven years. The field died out at some point and is being revived as I write.
“NorthEast Petroleum is owned by another Fulani businessman from the North East, Alhaji Saleh Mohammed Jambo”, Alabo-George testifies. “The license was awarded to him by General Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida”.
Another truth: North East Petroleum has NEVER produced a single drop of oil since that award in the early 90s. There, simply, hasn’t been a discovery worth the while for operator TOTAL.
I agree that Theophilus Danjuma, also a Northerner, is entitled to contest for the award of the man who made the most fortune, at a sitting, on an oil acreage in Nigeria.
Alabo-George’s article, in his rush to conclusions, even understates the significance, by claiming that Danjuma’s company,  South Atlantic Petroleum Limited(SAPETRO),  made $1Billion from the deal.
The truth is that China National Overseas Offshore Company(CNOOC ), signed a definitive agreement with SAPETRO to acquire a 45% working interest in  OML 130 for $2.268 billion cash.
I don’t know how much the broker of the deal took, but I am yet to confirm if the Nigerian government earned any withholding tax from that transaction. In spite of what he has earned “upfront”, Danjuma’s SAPETRO gets 25,600Barrels of Oil per day for its 15% of OML 130 from the Akpo field, which is delivering 175,000BOPD.
But if you complain about Northerner Danjuma, what about the Alakijas, a Yoruba couple whose company, Famfa Oil, is “entitled”, every day, to 25,000BOPD from Chevron operated Agbami Field, located in deepwater OML 127?.
These two companies are two of the four largest producing Nigerian companies today. The other two are Adenuga’s Conoil(25,000BOPD)  and Seplat Petroleum(37,000BOPD, operated, 16,000BOPD, equity).
Only one of those four companies is Northern owned. And it is outright falsehood that “ 80 per cent of crude oil and gas produced by indigenous companies is controlled by the North-East”.
But, as I said again: which technical and managerial capacity are we building on the back of the rent collected from these leases. It’s the real job.
The last example I’d touch, before the concluding commentary, for space purposes, is the case of Rilwan Lukman, who Alabo-Gorge cites as having controlling shares in Afren, the UK listed company. Lukman was there on the ground floor of the construction of Afren, around 2004, no doubt, but the key founders of Afren are Ethelbert Cooper, the Liberian businessman and Osman Shahenshah, who is the current Chief Executive.
What people like Lukman and Egbert Imomoh, the other Nigerian on the company’s board in the founding days, did, is the kind of thing I urge Nigerians in their positions to do.
Use your knowledge to access and create value, not to grab and destroy value. Cooper and Shanenshah knew that Lukman(then out of office both from OPEC and as Nigerian special adviser), and Imomoh(then recently retired as Deputy Managing Director Of Shell Nigeria) knew the Nigerian oil industry deeply and could access oil and gas fields that were lying fallow.
Shanenshah, coming from a financial services background, knew how to raise funds: the most important thing in oilfield exploration and development. Indeed the first piece of news by which most people knew of the existence of Afren was that the IMF had agreed to give a 5Million dollar loan to this company, which was only just about starting. It pays to have Lukman on your board.
Yet, in spite of Lukman’s influence in the Nigerian polity, Afren had never accessed Nigerian acreages via government awards. Afren, cash in hand, running a technically proficient company, approaches Nigerian indigenous owners of assets-like Ndimi’s Oriental Resources, Amni and several marginal field holders, and signs agreements with them to be technical partners.
After Afren has recovered its investment via cost oil, Afren and the company continue to share the proceeds from the field 50:50 for the life of the field. Afren uses Nigerian technical capacity to a large degree and it trains a lot of people. But it can do more.
Afren has never benefitted from bid round or government-sanctioned discretionary awards, so why would anyone link Lukman’s involvement in Afren in a list that has a number of Northerners supposedly benefitting from government largesse? That is part of the trouble I have with Alabo-George’s essay.
I wouldn’t compare Lukman’s relationship with Afren to the benefits that Atiku Abubakar derives from being a part owner of Intels, the logistics company which takes advantage of the free trade zone in Onne, near Port Harcourt.
This particular example helps us to locate “the Nigerian tendency”, beyond  “the Northern tendency”, in this discussion. Because, really, we are just all the same.
A foreign company comes to Nigeria to set up for business. Because of the difficulties we invent as barriers to entry, this company requires the services of some big Nigerian men, preferably those who have worked for government, for access.
What Atiku Abubakar has done with Intels has parallels in other sectors of the economy and is comparable with what Yoruba chieftains, Ijaw leaders, Igbo High Chiefs, Idoma overlords, etc, etc, have done with many other companies operating here.
That’s how people became key shareholders of companies like Julius Berger. As I write, the key sentiment underlining the complaints against the tolling on the Lekki Expressway is that “most of the money will go to Tinubu’s pocket”. That’s the word on the street.
Brokerage is not a bad thing on its own, but what we need to stress is a level playing field, rule of law, security of tenor and equity and fairness as much as possible, for all.
If I really want to be mischievous, I’d focus on the recent deal in which Shell and Agip have had to pay in excess of one billion dollars to Dan Etete, a south-south man, for stakes in Oil Prospecting Lease OPL 245. And I would ask “Is that necessarily right”? Should the president, a south-south Ijaw man, have waded in to ask Shell and Agip to move the deal forward? But that’s a story for another day.
In my book, people from everywhere have taken advantage of the unstructured way we have dispensed with oil and gas acreages. Naming names about which Northerner got what size of the pie is less useful than a focus on how government is insisting on open and transparent bidding, but more importantly, on Nigerian technical know how and management.
You can’t hand over an acreage and walk away. You have to monitor what the holder is doing. How he is ensuring employment.  If we can’t, with all the treasure, build five private E&P companies that have the internal competencies that Shell has and can go out and buy and operate assets the way that UBA and GTB and Ecobank venture into Ghana and The Gambia, then we have wasted all of the 56 years we have spent since the hoorah at Oloibiri.
Akinosho, a petroleum geologist, former news reporter, and one-time community newspaper editor, is now publisher of the well-regarded African Oil+Gas Report
PremiumTimes

Opposition Parties’ Merger And the Danger Of Acute Cynicism


The average Nigerian has the right to be cynical! This is what becomes of a people who have been made to endure years of unfulfilled expectations in governance. We are a people with a brutalised psyche. We have hoped for better days but got disappointment in return so we would rather not hope again. That sounds just all right until we realise that it is the nature of the human spirit to live in hope. To modify the popular title from the literary icon, Wole Soyinka, the man dies in him/her who loses hope! It is hope that makes us get up from the bed in the morning, that makes us try again, that makes us push on with life in spite of the odds. When we stop to live in hope, our mind is automatically reconditioned to a “failure” or “defeat” mode. Then, even though we live, the life we live become like mere shadow.
A mind in defeat mode is a cynical mind. Never believing, ever doubting. A mild cynical mind dismisses any suggested solutions with a wave of the hand. But I like to address the variant I call “acute cynicism”. The acutely cynical mind goes to length in analysing a problem only to show you why the proffered solutions cannot work. Unfortunately, one thing that escapes his radar of intellectual prognostication is finding the solutions that can work. He is therefore, a specialist in pointing out the impossible or implausible but totally helpless in pointing out or attempting to do the necessary. Simply put, the acute cynic lives in the paralysis of analysis.  He has lost hope and his mind has been conditioned to see nothing but obstacles.
I have seen a wind of cynicism both of the mild and the acute types greeting the recent announcement of the major opposition political parties in Nigeria of their merger and formation of the all Progressives Congress, APC. Even those who have been involved in the search for political change in the country seem to have been caught up in this web of cynicism. Many questions have been raised, with accompanying analysis all aimed at just creating a doubt as to the viability of this move as an alternative to the PDP’s legacy of rudderless governance. In as much as I concede that the merger of the parties is not in itself a solution to our political quagmire, I believe that it holds the possibility of throwing up the space for more intense engagement by citizens who have good intentions for the greatness of our nation. I’ll return to this point in my conclusion. Let me try to take some of the issues I have heard people raise.
Some say the new Party is a marriage of strange bed-fellows. People who peddle this view seem to forget that there are good people and bad people everywhere, including the religious orders and houses. The Parties in this merger are coming with all manner of personalities but we seem to forget that the product of the merger is a new Party that will have its constitution, manifesto and methods of doing things. Before the new Party takes a definite shape, there is a window of opportunity for the cynics to jump in and create power blocs through which they can influence the shape of the Party. That is how to play politics, rather than just sitting there and criticising.
Another issue that many critics have raised borders on the Ideology of the new Party. “They don’t have an ideology”, says the critic, “they just want to grab power”.  Unfortunately, people who bandy this “ideology talk” leave one wondering if they understand the meaning of political ideology. I have seen folks use the lack of ideology to write off any political movement without defining what they mean by “ideology”. They usually confine the meaning of political ideology to the American model of democrats and conservatives. What the cynic fails to realise is that an ideology is a value system that develops or coalesces over time. It is not merely a statement or declaration! It is an orientation to solving a perceived social, economic or political problem; hence, you have those whose political ideology is all about protecting the environment, emphasising traditional values (like monarchy), promoting racial, class or ethnic superiority, etc. If you define “ideology” in terms of liberal or conservative, socialist or capitalist, left wing or right wing, etc, with due respect, you have read a lot of books, and I’d counsel that you book the next flight to utopia.  Real life situations are ever dynamic and cannot be fitted into ideological straightjackets. At this level of Nigeria’s development, I’d rather align with the candidate or party who has clear cut solutions to the pressing socio-economic problems of the country, than the one who preaches socialism or capitalism, liberalism or conservativism – all of which could just be high sounding clichés devoid of content. So when I see a person or party set to fight corruption headlong, I’m more inclined to get closer to him than to the one who regales me with empty clichés in the name of ideology. The traditional ideological mould which pitches socialism against capitalism has proven so inadequate in articulating and solving the developmental problems facing mankind hence the western world is becoming more socialist while China has become capitalist! So much for “ideology”
Therefore, when a group of persons, even though some have questionable antecedents, come together to say they are unhappy about the way the country has been run over the years and hold themselves out as capable of providing alternative leadership within the political process, the least anyone can do is to see how their thoughts and intentions develop into a concrete plan of action. Even at that, you are not obliged to agree with them but that must be based on intelligent reasoning. We shouldn’t go looking for “ideology” as if it is one esoteric cure-all portion. Let us rally round the ideology of fighting corruption, enthroning merit in our national life, providing the much needed infrastructure for socio-economic development, etc. Better still, anyone who thinks she/he knows how things ought to be done more properly should develop his/her own political base as a counter balance to perceived lack of “ideology”. The only true alternative to what you are criticising is what you are doing.      
Similarly, I find it difficult to comprehend this talk about the merger being all about grabbing political power. Please, what else do people look for in politics if not to influence the way a society if governed? A political party is either in “power” or aspiring to take control of “power”. This is pretty elementary! Ok, should the merger be about cheering the present leadership? Should it be about settling domestic disputes? Organising owambe? Or sharing subsidy fund? It must necessarily be about “grabbing political power” – whatever that means, because that is the only way to show us what they have to offer in terms of alternative governance. It is either we have fundamentally misunderstood the nature of politics or we have sunk too deep into cynicism.
We are all agreed that there are fundamental problems hindering the progress of our nation, corruption, violence, incompetence in leadership, mediocrity, etc. Except our mind is already working in the defeat mode, otherwise we should be proffering solutions and working towards solutions rather than writing off what another person is doing. Even our friends who are trying to “reform” the PDP are by far more honourable than the person who is paralysed in and by his/her analysis. For the acute cynic who is criticising and doing nothing, please, channel that same energy to productive engagement today. Pick up your broken pieces of hope and become a carrier of the message of a new Nigeria. Tell people around you about the possibility of a new nation and the role they must play in their private lives and little corners. For the persons who are involved in the search for change but who think they derive further legitimacy by writing off what others are doing even before they see the shape of it, I encourage you to conserve that energy and channel it into what you are building. It is the efforts of women and men of goodwill spread over time and space that can bring change in any given social situation.
Finally, a cynical mind is a defeated mind. It is only a helpless man who whines over a problem that demands solution. Perpetual analysis only results in paralysis. Once again, the only true alternative to what you criticise is what you are doing.
Leonard Ugbajah
Lawyer, public policy analyst.
Saharareporters