“Do not try to lean
on a wall that is not near you.”
Ghanaian Proverb.
Northern
Governors set up a seemingly powerful committee on reconciliation, healing and
security last week, three months into the silence of President Jonathan over
the long list of grievances and demands of presented to him by Northern Elders.
The governors’ committee is meant to liaise with stakeholders in the states
affected by the JASLIWAJ(a.k.a. Boko Haram) insurgency and other security
threats, and get to the root of other security challenges and proffer
solutions. It also has their mandate to negotiate with indentified groups,
liaise with the federal government and agree on best approaches to resolving
security challenges, and work out modalities for reconciling warring parties
and communities in the north. The governors say recurring incidents of violence
in the north have almost crippled the economy and society of the region, and
they represent serious challenges to national stability, unity and development.
Chairman of the Northern Governors’ Forum, Dr. M.B. Aliyu wants the committee
to assist by broadly looking at the issues of religious extremism, intolerance
and mutual disrespect which appear to be creating more ethnic and religious cleavages
that are damaging northern unity. He lamented the inability of a single
northern state to pay one month salary from internally-generated revenue. He hinted
at the resolve to sustain resistance by the northern governors against what
they see as unfair distribution of oil revenues.
It
will be uncharitable to dismiss this latest move by northern governors as a red
herring, but it will be equally hypocritical to applaud it as a statesmanship from
leaders of people with their backs against many walls. The Northern Elders’
Forum which met and presented a litany of requests and demands to President
Jonathan three months ago has to be a backdrop to an assessment of the utility
of this move by the governors. Almost bowing to the ground, the leader of the
elders appealed to the President to demilitarize the north, curb gross abuses
by security agents including extra-judicial killings; discourage official
perception of the insurgency as a northern Muslim resistance against the
President; revisit many of the reports of investigations into ethno-religious
conflicts and implement their recommendations; tackle corruption, address youth
unemployment, stop arbitrary and indiscriminate removal of senior officers from
the public and security services, and many more demands. There were no reports
by the elders that they had approached northern governors earlier to take up
these issues with the President, as people with political and legal obligations
and clout.
The
decision by northern elders to engage Mr President directly on issues that
would have been effectively taken up at numerous levels and occasions by
governors was a serious indictment of the governors. Even if, as was rumoured,
some of the governors had encouraged the elders to go straight to the Villa,
they would only have shot themselves in the foot. The desperate, yet unproductive
sojourn of the elders may also reinforce a widespread perception that they hold
the governors in very low esteem, and would rather appeal to a President seen
in many circles as a co-facilitator of the political and security situation of
the north, than appeal to them to take up its cause. The President’s silence since
their visit also speaks loudly his perception of northern problems.
It
is difficult to avoid the impression that northern governors have set up this
and two other committees as a belated reaction to control major damage. So much
water has passed under the bridge, that you have to wonder whether even members
of the committee will believe that they can do any genuinely productive work. The
insurgency has taken roots in many parts of the north, and all governors say is
that they have no control over security matters. They are substantially its
targets, and their influence over the community which can be mobilized against
it is virtually nil. So they cannot fight it, and they cannot resist it. Their coterie
of the ulaama is politically compromised, and they live behind secure
embankments, too removed from the people. The economy in much of the north is
well and truly wrecked, but neither the lavish lifestyle of governors nor the
army of political hacks paid from public funds is showing evidence of being
affected. Governors cannot call each other to order. They cannot set benchmarks
for Jang in the manner he relates with some ethnic groups in Plateau State, and
they cannot prevail on Yakowa to do something on the consequences of the Zonkwa
massacre. They cannot take on the President on the P.I.B; on the on-shore,
off-shore dichotomy, on the operations of security agencies and their impact on
communities; or on any major policy which affects the north substantially.
For
whatever it is worth, many people of impeccable integrity and undoubted
commitment have accepted to be part of the governors’ committee. They have a
major task ahead of them, particularly given the fact that many of the problems
they are being asked to find solutions for have their roots and locations in
the manner governors run the north. The committee couldn’t have started at a
more inauspicious moment either, with the JASLIWAJ insurgency reportedly
denying reports that it is engaged in negotiations with government, and even
warning Dr Datti Ahmed to stay clear. They will be well advised to take some of
their terms of reference with a pinch of salt. The charge to dialogue with any
or all sources of the violence in the north must sound hollow, coming from
people who cannot facilitate the most elementary of contacts, or exploit the
huge goodwill which exists in their communities towards fighting the
insurgency. The task of identifying the roots of the security challenges should
not be difficult to accomplish: they are the task masters, who have raised bad
governance, corruption and impunity to new levels. Members of the committee
should not bother with the term of reference which says they should liaise with
the federal government and deliberate on the best approach to resolving
security challenges. If the federal government has the slightest clue over how
our numerous challenges can be resolved, why would it wait for a security
committee to come for them?
The
members of the governors’ committee should take their jobs seriously. To do
this, they will need to re-write their terms of reference. The sources and the
results of the security and economic problems of the north are here in the
north. The federal government and the rest of Nigeria are only marginally
responsible, the former as a seemingly-willing accomplice in a tragic
self-mutilation, the latter, beneficiaries of a weakening competition. They can
write their report in a month because combatants, warring communities, JASLIWAJ
insurgents or the federal government will not give them the time of day. If governors
are content with public relations gimmicks, many of the respected members of
this committee should not be. The problems of the north and national security
are too important to be handled by governors hiding behind committees.
No comments:
Post a Comment