“Governments Never Learn. Only People Learn.”`
(Milton Friedman, 1912 – 2006).
Students
of politics are often told that democracy is government of the people,
for the people, by the people. Sadly many of them believe it. They also
mouth it so often, that millions of people untutored in the nature and
dynamics of power believe it as well. The tragedy, as billions of people
who live under systems they believe are democratic have found out, is
that democracy is very often just a means of changing leaders who do
more or less the same things to the people. Leaders emerge from
elections which may or may not be credible; and they exercise mandates
within the limitations of their personal capacities, and the demands of
the very few who influence what they do. The only time people are
substantially involved in democracies is during elections, and even
these are so choreographed or fixed that they successively alienate more
of the electorate at every successive election.
President
Goodluck Jonathan is re-writing the basic rules of leadership, such
that established theories, strategies and ideas about governance,
accountability and competence will have to be re-evaluated. On the face
of it, you would think that he has read the late British statesman, C.R
Atlee (1883 – 1967), who said: “Democracy means government by
discussion, but it is only effective if you can stop people talking”. Or
that he has literally taken the view of P.S. Buck (1892 – 1973), the
American writer who said, “People on the whole are very simple-minded,
and in whatever country one finds them. They are so simple as to take
literally, more than not, the things leaders tell them”. Perhaps his
long-term vision on the outcome of his contest with the Nigerian people
over the fuel subsidy is informed by the insight of August Bebel, (1840 –
1913) the German politician who said that “All political questions, all
matters of right, are at the bottom only questions of might.” If he
believes that brawn alone will win him this battle, he clearly has not
read Machiavelli, who said that a good leader should be both a fox and a
lion, because a fox is defenseless against lions, and a lion is
defenseless against traps.
If
President Jonathan has a strategy for victory against all the battles
he is currently engaged in, it is possible that at its heart is the
assumption that the more problems you take on at the same time, the
better your chances of victory. And the bigger the problem, the more you
are likely to succeed against it. Just when he is being swamped by the
insurgency of Boko Haram and a nation demanding that he acts decisively
against security failures all over the nation, President Jonathan lights
another fire around fuel subsidy. He abandons his “consultations with
stakeholders” – please note that these are not defined as the Nigerian
people – on his plans to remove subsidy, and decides to go it alone.
Convinced of the validity of his position, he repudiates the position of
the National Assembly, labour, civil society organizations, mothers,
young people, the unemployed, the wealthy and the urban poor and just
about everyone else. He obviously disagreed with Milton Friedman (1912 –
2006) the American economist who said that “The government solution to a
problem is usually as bad as the problem”. Perhaps he paid little
attention to history, and the experiences of his predecessors, virtually
all of whom burnt their fingers very badly when they tinkered with pump
prices.
Or
perhaps he had read Hegel (1770 – 1831) the German philosopher who
said, “But what experience and history teach is this, that peoples and
government have never learned anything from history”. Alone and
isolated, he stands against a torrent of hostility from a nation which
cannot understand or forgive him for serious miscalculations and serial
ineptitude on vital issues around governance. Perhaps his advisers have
convinced him that Andrew Jackson (1974 – 1826), a former US President
was right when he said, “One man with courage makes a majority”. His
economic advisers who sold him the dummy on subsidy removal as
beneficial in the long run may have ignored John Maynard Keynes (1883 –
1946) who said, “This long run is a misleading guide to current affairs.
In the long run we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy,
too useless a task if in tempestuous seasons they can only tell us that
when the storm is long past the ocean is flat again.”
The
multitudes of challenges which President Jonathan has chosen to deal
with at the same time are making him new enemies by the day. Book Haram
makes Christians and Muslims feel he is not protecting them enough.
Christians particularly feel vulnerable when they are attacked by a
group that says all Nigerian Christians are guilty of the mass murders
of Muslims in Plateau, Kaduna, Bauchi and Lagos, and they and their
churches will be attacked at every opportunity. Muslims are angry that
they are being blamed and made responsible for everything Boko Haram
does by both the government and many other Christians. Security agencies
are stretched and stressed, and it would not help their morale much
when the Commander-In-Chief says they are infiltrated by Boko Haram
sleepers. By his utterances and actions, President Jonathan has united
former foes, adversaries and irritants into a formidable enemy. He has
ignored Machiavelli’s advise, when he said, “All well-governed states
and wise princes have taken care not to reduce the nobility to despair,
nor the people to discontent.”
In
the next few weeks, the nation will know whether President Jonathan has
succeeded in transforming the live of Nigerians by making sure that
everything they buy costs a lot more. Or the nation would be relieved
that it does not have to go through this type of transformation. Either
way, there will be a loser. Jonathan will do well to learn the lessons
of dealing with enemies which Machiavelli put forward: “Men are either
crushed, or pampered. They can get revenge for minor injuries, but not
for fatal ones.” If he yields ground on the subsidy issue, his
adversaries will punish him over and over for his weakness. If he sticks
his ground, he may break the back of the popular resistance, but his
opposition will warn Nigerians about their lives in the same manner Neil
Kinnock, the former labour opposition leader in Britain warned his
countrymen over Margaret Thatcher: “If Margaret Thatcher wins – I warn
you not to be ordinary. I warn you not to be young. I warn you not to
fall ill. I warn you not to get old,”
Students
of power have great opportunities to re-visit conventional wisdom under
current developments. They may reach the same conclusions about the PDP
and did Baron de Montesquieu (1689 – 1755) who said, “when a government
lasts a long time, it deteriorates by insensible degrees.” If they seek
to find an answer to the riddle that Jonathan says he is removing
subsidy because of corruption, they will be further confounded by
Jonathan Swift (1667 – 1745) the British writer who said, “Politics, as
the word is understood, are nothing but corruptions.” When we are faced
with a choice of supporting the retention of the subsidy (and,
Jonathan’s people will say, supporting the “cabal”) or supporting
Jonathan, we could be further confused by the humor of George Carlin who
said, “Politics is so corrupt, even the dishonest people get screwed.”
Perhaps all Nigerians are coming to terms with the leadership which they
elected to govern them. Henry Youngman, a comedian said, “Personally,
I’m against political jokes. Too often they get elected to office.”
No comments:
Post a Comment